| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"AnotherDeanRampage" |
| Date: |
20 Jan 2004 09:16:41 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
"Republican Double Standard" <bio_dudeNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9476653558173biodudeNOSPAMhotmail@130.133.1.4...
"Winston Smith, American Patriot" <FranzKafka@Oceania.WhiteHouse.GOV>
wrote in news:Xns9475D39E8D777WSAP1962@64.164.98.50:
"topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in inimitable style:
Klinton's 8 years gave us multiple terrorist attacks on US interests
and NO credible response. That's what emboldened the terrorists to
commit 9/11.
No, what emboldened the terrorists is that George W. Bush was on duty,
and it was on his watch that the terrorists committed this atrocity,
despite the 11 September Commission's findings that the Clinton admin
had warned the Bush admin of this very possibility.
Actually, what emboldened them is that Bush was *NOT* on duty. He was on
his annual, predictable, regular-as-metamucil, August month-long vacation
on the ranch.
So you Democrats actually feel that unless the president is physically IN
the Oval Office itself he is "not on duty"?
Do you Democrats actually not wish to be taken seriously by us?
.
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
20 Jan 2004 07:27:00 PM |
|
|
Democrats do actually feel that unless the president is physically IN
the Oval Office porking White House Interns, he is "not on duty"?
They've had a lot of experience in these matters.
Surely you all remember Whatsisname?
.
|
|
|
| User: "In The Darkness" |
|
| Title: Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
20 Jan 2004 08:33:27 PM |
|
|
Docky Wocky wrote:
Democrats do actually feel that unless the president is physically IN
the Oval Office porking White House Interns, he is "not on duty"?
They've had a lot of experience in these matters.
Surely you all remember Whatsisname?
Gee... My President Fucked an Intern,
Yours Fucked the Free World.
I wonder who is _really_ on moral high ground ?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
20 Jan 2004 09:34:39 PM |
|
|
in the darkness sez:
" Gee... My President Fucked an Intern,
Yours Fucked the Free World.
I wonder who is _really_ on moral high ground ?..."
__________________________________
Well, since you'll never see anything like a moral high ground, just
continue your delusions.
You might mistakenly think I want to change your solid little mind, but I
believe in leaving supercilious folk like you to your own ends
.
|
|
|
| User: "NAPALM" |
|
| Title: Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
20 Jan 2004 10:41:26 PM |
|
|
Docky Wocky <mrchuck@lst.net> wrote in article
<jrmPb.22727$MV4.18769@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>...
in the darkness sez:
" Gee... My President Fucked an Intern,
Yours Fucked the Free World.
I wonder who is _really_ on moral high ground ?..."
__________________________________
Well, since you'll never see anything like a moral high ground, just
continue your delusions.
You might mistakenly think I want to change your solid little mind, but I
believe in leaving supercilious folk like you to your own ends
$$$ Given your responses I have concluded that, all Americans are unfit
to be president...... The 9-11 attacks were brought on by several US
regimes dating back to the Afghan, Soviet conflict, the Mujahadeen were
betrayed by the Americans,
they were mis-informed intentionally, from the CIA, about the severity of
hostile forces remaining against them and were slaughtered, Bin Laden held
the CIA responsible, for the thousands of casualties suffered from the
Mujahadeen.This is what gave birth to the Taliban.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "In The Darkness" |
|
| Title: Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
20 Jan 2004 11:04:14 PM |
|
|
Actually, you sound about right.
You may consider me closed minded, but your
analysis, as far as it goes, sounds correct.
BTW, now, who exactly in the CIA did they
hate SO BAD for deceiving them ?
Yup, the very same family.
Goes a long way to support the theories
that 911 wouldn't have happened had it
NOT been "VV" that was elected.
The question is, did they prod the tiger on purpose,
or was it just feeling hurt... and if so, how come
it fit their plans, so well ?
And, don't forget, the money that financed 911,
is traceable to the very same person that funded
several other CIA coups... close friends of the
Bush family.
NAPALM wrote:
Docky Wocky <mrchuck@lst.net> wrote in article
<jrmPb.22727$MV4.18769@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>...
in the darkness sez:
" Gee... My President Fucked an Intern,
Yours Fucked the Free World.
I wonder who is _really_ on moral high ground ?..."
__________________________________
Well, since you'll never see anything like a moral high ground, just
continue your delusions.
You might mistakenly think I want to change your solid little mind, but I
believe in leaving supercilious folk like you to your own ends
$$$ Given your responses I have concluded that, all Americans are unfit
to be president...... The 9-11 attacks were brought on by several US
regimes dating back to the Afghan, Soviet conflict, the Mujahadeen were
betrayed by the Americans,
they were mis-informed intentionally, from the CIA, about the severity of
hostile forces remaining against them and were slaughtered, Bin Laden held
the CIA responsible, for the thousands of casualties suffered from the
Mujahadeen.This is what gave birth to the Taliban.....
.
|
|
|
| User: "NAPALM" |
|
| Title: Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
21 Jan 2004 12:00:33 AM |
|
|
In The Darkness <north@onecall.net> wrote in article
<bul19k$j3f$1@news.onecall.net>...
Actually, you sound about right.
You may consider me closed minded, but your
analysis, as far as it goes, sounds correct.
BTW, now, who exactly in the CIA did they
hate SO BAD for deceiving them ?
Yup, the very same family.
Goes a long way to support the theories
that 911 wouldn't have happened had it
NOT been "VV" that was elected.
Yes, it makes sense in the capacity that bushy senior,
was a key player in the first Gulf war, very, very interesting....
The question is, did they prod the tiger on purpose,
or was it just feeling hurt... and if so, how come
it fit their plans, so well ?
$$$ The question of, prod the tiger intentionally, is an interesting
concept. Thank you, That actually makes allot of
sense. That would indeed explain allot of strange behavior
of the US i.e. invade Kuwait and stay in the Muslim Holy Land
and give Israel anything they want, while the Israelites oppress and
slaughters Palestinians. Then the US leads the most crippling and cruel
sanctions in human history, against the people of Iraq which lead to the
death of 500,000 children ...
safe to assume that someone in the Middle East is not going to be very
pleased, ah, would you believe millions, how about the
entire region ???....
And, don't forget, the money that financed 911,
is traceable to the very same person that funded
several other CIA coups... close friends of the
Bush family.
NAPALM wrote:
Docky Wocky <mrchuck@lst.net> wrote in article
<jrmPb.22727$MV4.18769@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>...
in the darkness sez:
" Gee... My President Fucked an Intern,
Yours Fucked the Free World.
I wonder who is _really_ on moral high ground ?..."
__________________________________
Well, since you'll never see anything like a moral high ground, just
continue your delusions.
You might mistakenly think I want to change your solid little mind, but
I
believe in leaving supercilious folk like you to your own ends
$$$ Given your responses I have concluded that, all Americans are unfit
to be president...... The 9-11 attacks were brought on by several US
regimes dating back to the Afghan, Soviet conflict, the Mujahadeen were
betrayed by the Americans,
they were mis-informed intentionally, from the CIA, about the severity
of
hostile forces remaining against them and were slaughtered, Bin Laden
held
the CIA responsible, for the thousands of casualties suffered from the
Mujahadeen.This is what gave birth to the Taliban.....
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
20 Jan 2004 11:32:32 PM |
|
|
mr napalm sez:
<Amongst other useless things>
...."The 9-11 attacks were brought on by several US
regimes dating back to the Afghan, Soviet conflict, the Mujahadeen were
betrayed by the Americans..."
_________________________________
Forward thinking individuals, weren't they?
In a few years, there won't be nothin' finer than betraying some
Mujahadeens.
It will become more difficult as the wacko islamist population gets
diminished, but eventually, even the gun-shy Russians will want to join in
again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "NAPALM" |
|
| Title: Re: Why any liberal is UNFIT to Be President |
21 Jan 2004 12:32:19 AM |
|
|
Docky Wocky <mrchuck@lst.net> wrote in article
<Q9oPb.23304$MV4.19862@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>...
mr napalm sez:
<Amongst other useless things>
..."The 9-11 attacks were brought on by several US
regimes dating back to the Afghan, Soviet conflict, the Mujahadeen were
betrayed by the Americans..."
_________________________________
Forward thinking individuals, weren't they?
In a few years, there won't be nothin' finer than betraying some
Mujahadeens.
It will become more difficult as the wacko islamist population gets
diminished, but eventually, even the gun-shy Russians will want to join
in
again.
$$$ Wacko America has arrived !! Now come on their boy
you don't mean them people are wacko do you ?? Ever been
to L.A. or seen inborn good old boys from the deep south,
SOUND FAMILIAR !!! Gun shy !! since when is Russia Gun shy, hey, why don't
you go for A burger in the Republic of Georgia...
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
