AnotherDeanRampage <DemmiesLoveThatStuff@HateCentral.com> wrote in article
<tDbPb.106273$I06.592430@attbi_s01>...
"Republican Double Standard" <bio_dudeNOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:Xns947664EBC82D3biodudeNOSPAMhotmail@130.133.1.4...
"topcat" <topcat@aboy.com> wrote in
news:buhrlb$qnj$1@news.monmouth.com:
Klinton's 8 years gave us multiple terrorist attacks on US interests
and NO credible response. That's what emboldened the terrorists to
commit 9/11.
You forgot to blame Clinton for the November 2001 bombing of the US
embassy
in Pakistan
Excuse us for asking, Mr. Democrat Thinker, but how does the terrorist
attack of 9/11 "prove" that Clinton "responded appropriately and
vigorously"
to the terrorist attacks which were REPEATEDLY made upon America during
the
8 years of Clinton??
$$$ That's right why was nothing done ?? Because the attacks were not
substantial enough to get public, or hope of
any global support, for the acting out of their manifesto, they needed
Pearl Harbor like conditions, it is similar to the Gulf of Tonkin, where
the American Government falsified an attack claiming they had been attacked
by a North Vietnamese gunship, a later investigation revealed the North
Vietnamese didn't even have a Navy of any sort, but the B52's went sailing
on HALLELUJAH !!! Why wasn't there heightened security
after they found enough explosives in Mr. Rassam's
trunk to level the LA X Airport, while attempting to cross the US and
Canadian border ?? Their was ample warnings and the
Bush man was very aware of it, you can find it everywhere in
pre 9-11 literature, Try reading Yossef Bodansky's Bio on
Bin Laden, titled THE MAN WHO DECLARED WAR ON
AMERICA, written well, well before the 9-11 attacks, full of
ominous warnings the whole bit sold everywhere, regardless
who was in office, PIG ameriKKKa was on the war path.........
'S
.
