| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"richard schumacher" |
| Date: |
12 Feb 2006 04:33:07 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Why do we fund the International Space Station? |
Now I understand how you think... you think ISS should be a welfare
program.
That's exactly how the US designed it. Now we get to live with it.
It would be just like a Neocon Repugnican to unilaterally abandon a
commitment when it becomes inconvenient.
.
|
|
| User: "Jorge R. Frank" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do we fund the International Space Station? |
12 Feb 2006 08:33:54 PM |
|
|
richard schumacher <no-spam@invalid.net> wrote in news:no-spam-
D37A15.16330712022006@news.isp.giganews.com:
Now I understand how you think... you think ISS should be a welfare
program.
That's exactly how the US designed it. Now we get to live with it.
s/US/Clinton/g
--
JRF
Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
think one step ahead of IBM.
.
|
|
|
| User: "richard schumacher" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do we fund the International Space Station? |
13 Feb 2006 09:10:01 PM |
|
|
In article <Xns9768D132D248Bjrfrank@216.196.97.131>,
"Jorge R. Frank" <jrfrank@ibm-pc.borg> wrote:
Now I understand how you think... you think ISS should be a welfare
program.
That's exactly how the US designed it. Now we get to live with it.
s/US/Clinton/g
You mis-spelled "Ronald Wilson Reagan". You're welcome. (What are you,
a neocon repugnican who blames Clinton for your heroes *****-ups?)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Chomko" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do we fund the International Space Station? |
21 Feb 2006 02:49:30 PM |
|
|
Jorge R. Frank (jrfrank@ibm-pc.borg) wrote:
: richard schumacher <no-spam@invalid.net> wrote in news:no-spam-
: D37A15.16330712022006@news.isp.giganews.com:
: >
: >> Now I understand how you think... you think ISS should be a welfare
: >> program.
: >
: > That's exactly how the US designed it. Now we get to live with it.
: s/US/Clinton/g
Yes, we never should have let Clinton design the ISS. We should have
stayed on the Reagan track of never getting anything done.
Eric
: --
: JRF
: Reply-to address spam-proofed - to reply by E-mail,
: check "Organization" (I am not assimilated) and
: think one step ahead of IBM.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Chomko" |
|
| Title: Re: Why do we fund the International Space Station? |
21 Feb 2006 02:48:09 PM |
|
|
richard schumacher (no-spam@invalid.net) wrote:
: > Now I understand how you think... you think ISS should be a welfare
: > program.
: That's exactly how the US designed it. Now we get to live with it.
: It would be just like a Neocon Repugnican to unilaterally abandon a
: commitment when it becomes inconvenient.
Yes, it will be a Democratic administration that saves Bush's "Moon, Mars
and Beyond" space initiative.
Eric
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
