"Johnny Trails Bighten" <KerriesAjoke@dumbDems.net> wrote in
news:s9zCc.24871$Y3.10859@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net:
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns951231DF72EB7ta2eenew@204.127.199.17...
"Team Caldwell" <Cal45rt@home.net> wrote in
news:2jv020F16afkrU1@uni-berlin.de:
"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9511E2C7B30F9ta2eenew@204.127.199.17...
"taurine" <acid@home.net> wrote in news:yboCc.11688$w07.4572
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:
Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9511B945F4CF3ta2eenew@216.148.227.77...
(Harry) wrote in
news:ee68a82.0406231145.5792a885@posting.google.com:
Mitchell Holman <ta2eeneNoEmail@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns95115F3068973ta2eenew@63.240.76.16>...
"alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in
news:HGcCc.120258$Gx4.43225@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
"Tim Crowley" <google@seattlemusicweb.com> wrote in message
news:f6a06663.0406221803.16191fe8@posting.google.com...
"alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in message
news:<qh2Cc.17539$OB3.2302@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
"Tim Crowley" <google@seattlemusicweb.com> wrote in
message
news:f6a06663.0406221318.5fae5f00@posting.google.com...
"alohacyberian" <alohacyberian@att.net> wrote in message
news:<H5TBc.113817$Gx4.106792@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
"Clave" <ClaviusFairAndBalanced@cablespeed.com> wrote
in
message news:10dfdlnfpicul8b@corp.supernews.com...
"OrionCA" <orionca@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:j0dfd0pp2fvd55a7j6t6bt45tv3c5maaae@4ax.com...
On 21 Jun 2004 08:36:34 -0700,
(Harry)
wrote:
I'm sorry, maybe I missed it, but the argument
has
been
made
that
everything the Cheney-Lay administration has done
internationally
has
had the effect of strengthening Al Qaida
specifically
and
increasing
the danger to Americans at home and abroad of
being
attacked,
and
I'm
not seeing your response to this argument.
90% of Al Qaeda's leadership is dead, imprisoned,
or
in hiding...
Cite?
Jim
Got Google? KM
YUP. IT DOESN'T SUPPORT YOUR CLAIM.
So, you've learned to just pick the unofficial sources
that
support your preconceived notions. So what else is new? I
still think it's safer to
join
the French Foreign Legion than enlist in Al Qaeda. ;-) KM
Well seeing that 100% of Al Qaeda are in hiding, I doubt
you
have
found a source that supports your claim.
I never made a claim, I just asked, "Got Google?"
"Well over half of the membership of Al Qaeda has
been killed or imprisoned since 9-11". KM
Keith Martin, AKA "alohacyberian", 3/16/04
I know some of you dittoheads are pretty out of it, but we just
ran the most expensive (5 billion/mo) and most successful
recruitment campaign in the history of Al Qaida, with hundreds
of
thousands of young people flocking to join and repay the great
satan for the invasion of Iraq.
You kill half their "membership", they recruit more members. I
don't really know how stupid you have to be not to realize this.
That is the tragedy of the war and the rightwingers
who support it.
why must you make it a partisan issue?
what about the leftwingers who support it?
is chris hitchens a rightwinger? how about elie weisel? alan
dershowitz?
how about all the rightwingers who DON'T support it?
pat buchanan?
iow, it is not as simple as you intend to portray it
The US has replaced Israel as the most
hated country by those living in the middle east. If America
was invaded by a foreign country with plans to replace our
government with theirs, how would WE react?
that's a stupid question because we are not a dictatorship, run by
a
murderous tortorous madman, that has invaded his neighbors, gassed
them, murdered 10's of thousands (note i said murdered, not killed)
of our own citizens, and that signed a ceasefire after the gulf
war.
You didn't answer the question. If the US was
invaded by a hostile foreign power bent on imposing
it's own brand of government, how would we react?
nor have you addressed my issues with your post;
however, in response to your question - violently, i would hope.
however, i don't think we would saw off innocent people's heads on
video, nor would we use churches and mosques as firebases, nor would
we
threaten people's families with rape and torture if they did not fight
for our cause. all of which SH's minions and other terrorists have
done
in iraq.
furthermore, invasion of us would not be justified.
invasion of iraq WAS justified.
Why? Because of the WMD's it didn't have?
No, because of the WMDs it DID have, as the recent WMD finds have proven.
But we also need to keep in mind that the WMDs were only one of many
reasons, all spelled out by the President, why we went to war.
Wrong. The WMD's were "What this war
was about and is about", remember?
Mitchell Holman
"But make no mistake -- as I said earlier --
we have high confidence that they have weapons
of mass destruction. That is what this war was
about and it is about."
White House Press Briefing
April 10, 2003
.
