| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Nate" |
| Date: |
14 Feb 2004 11:03:25 PM |
| Object: |
Re: Worst President in history ? NOT |
"Horatio Fudruckerton" <NoSpam@Hotmail> wrote in message
news:ofos20h2tukgdcbtfhrfv6jqoc0cq0i6n8@4ax.com...
Something the left always seems to leave unsaid.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They
complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush
was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point: We
didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by
terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and
mismanagement
claims.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us; Japan did. From
1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never
attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost,an average of 18,333
per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never
attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975,
58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia
never
attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three
times
by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated
two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida. Put nuclear
inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and
captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this abroad
while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Liberal speak.
Defending Hitler is what I would expect from a right winger. Germany
declared war on us, not us on them. You would take over Iraq but not defend
the Koreans? Well, I wouldn't do either. Actually, it was Eisenhower
(Truman if you go back far enough) who got us into Vietnam. Bush crushed
the Taliban, but Reagan put them in power to begin with, and now there is a
resurgence. He's not the worst anyway. That honor goes to Grant (you know
who he is?)
--
Tired of the same rhetoric of lies and deceit?
http://www.gentlemanjim.net/
"It aint what you don't know that'll hurt ya, it's what you "know" that aint
so." -- Will Rogers
.
|
|
| User: "Alan McIntire" |
|
| Title: Re: Worst President in history ? NOT |
15 Feb 2004 07:19:07 PM |
|
|
"Nate" <DrummKat54@cox.net> wrote in message news:<u4DXb.69741$F15.69606@fed1read06>...
"Horatio Fudruckerton" <NoSpam@Hotmail> wrote in message
news:ofos20h2tukgdcbtfhrfv6jqoc0cq0i6n8@4ax.com...
Something the left always seems to leave unsaid.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They
complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush
was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point: We
didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by
terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and
mismanagement
claims.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us; Japan did. From
1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never
attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost,an average of 18,333
per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never
attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975,
58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia
never
attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three
times
by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated
two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida. Put nuclear
inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and
captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this abroad
while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Liberal speak.
Defending Hitler is what I would expect from a right winger. Germany
declared war on us, not us on them.
We were supplying the United Kingdom with "Lend Lease" weaponry
prior to our officially entering the war. Those "lend lease"
supplies were an act of war on our part. - A. McIntire
(cut)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Alan McIntire" |
|
| Title: Re: Worst President in history ? NOT |
15 Feb 2004 07:19:08 PM |
|
|
"Nate" <DrummKat54@cox.net> wrote in message news:<u4DXb.69741$F15.69606@fed1read06>...
"Horatio Fudruckerton" <NoSpam@Hotmail> wrote in message
news:ofos20h2tukgdcbtfhrfv6jqoc0cq0i6n8@4ax.com...
Something the left always seems to leave unsaid.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They
complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed Bush
was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point: We
didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by
terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and
mismanagement
claims.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us; Japan did. From
1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never
attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost,an average of 18,333
per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never
attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975,
58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia
never
attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three
times
by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated
two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida. Put nuclear
inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and
captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this abroad
while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Liberal speak.
Defending Hitler is what I would expect from a right winger. Germany
declared war on us, not us on them.
We were supplying the United Kingdom with "Lend Lease" weaponry
prior to our officially entering the war. Those "lend lease"
supplies were an act of war on our part. - A. McIntire
(cut)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Worst President in history ? NOT |
15 Feb 2004 11:12:01 AM |
|
|
Nate; Let's just deal in a few facts.
(1) We are under attack, right now, by Islamic fanatics. We have been for
over a decade, and many Americans have died as a direct result.
(2) It's an undeniable fact the your sick President Clinton did absolutely
nothing
of signifinance to protect America as these Americans were murdered.
(3) President Bush has taken bold, honorable, and wise actions to
aggressively
engage and defeat this serious threat.
(4) President Bush had absolutely nothing to do with 911. This is a silly,
paranoid, psycho theory developed by you leftists. I hope this and all your
other psycho fantasies stick around, so people will see what you people
really are.
Nitwits.Eventually, you will scare the hell out of reasonable people.
The left in this country today is simply made up of old communists, hippies,
and their spoiled brat kids who attract all the lazy bums and freeloaders
with promises of government handouts to support them unto the grave. This
last paragraph, addmittedly is MY opinion, not a fact that could be proven,
but
simple observation and common sense prove the point to any reasonable
observer.
"Nate" <DrummKat54@cox.net> wrote in message
news:u4DXb.69741$F15.69606@fed1read06...
"Horatio Fudruckerton" <NoSpam@Hotmail> wrote in message
news:ofos20h2tukgdcbtfhrfv6jqoc0cq0i6n8@4ax.com...
Something the left always seems to leave unsaid.
Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They
complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed
Bush
was the worst president in U.S. history. Let's clear up one point: We
didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember, it was started by
terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and
mismanagement
claims.
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us; Japan did.
From
1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never
attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost,an average of
18,333
per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never
attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975,
58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia
never
attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three
times
by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple
occasions.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has
liberated
two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida. Put nuclear
inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and
captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.
We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this
abroad
while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Liberal speak.
Defending Hitler is what I would expect from a right winger. Germany
declared war on us, not us on them. You would take over Iraq but not
defend
the Koreans? Well, I wouldn't do either. Actually, it was Eisenhower
(Truman if you go back far enough) who got us into Vietnam. Bush crushed
the Taliban, but Reagan put them in power to begin with, and now there is
a
resurgence. He's not the worst anyway. That honor goes to Grant (you
know
who he is?)
--
Tired of the same rhetoric of lies and deceit?
http://www.gentlemanjim.net/
"It aint what you don't know that'll hurt ya, it's what you "know" that
aint
so." -- Will Rogers
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wyle Coyote" |
|
| Title: Re: Worst President in history ? |
15 Feb 2004 01:58:28 AM |
|
|
x-no-archive:yes
He's the worst damn man to exist on the face of the earth...and his daddy's
worse!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nate" |
|
| Title: Re: Worst President in history ? |
15 Feb 2004 02:33:42 AM |
|
|
"Wyle Coyote" <T@NSF.com> wrote in message
news:EEFXb.4513$tL3.501@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
x-no-archive:yes
He's the worst damn man to exist on the face of the earth...and his
daddy's
worse!
His daddy is pretty bad if he's worse than the worst man on earth... ;P
--
Tired of the same rhetoric of lies and deceit?
http://www.gentlemanjim.net/
"It aint what you don't know that'll hurt ya, it's what you "know" that aint
so." -- Will Rogers
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
