| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
| Date: |
06 Oct 2005 11:11:35 AM |
| Object: |
Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
Nick wrote:
Ken Littleton was the odd man out in the closeknit, Belle Haven
community that was suspicious of outsiders. In retrospect, it is
difficult to understand why a psychological basketcase like Ken
Littleton was never prosecuted for the murder of Martha Moxley. It is
simply not possible to understand the murder of Martha outside of the
context that Ken Littleton did it, and using the Skakel golf glog to
divert suspicion away from himself was simply a master stroke that
betrayed his involvement.
When the Skakels moved out of Belle Haven, a piece of the Golf Club
that Ken Littleton used to blackmail the Skakels was found in the
attic, proving once again that Llittleton's capacity to get away with
murder was the work of obsessive manipulation. To be sure, the media
prefers to promote the bizarre claim that the Skakel machine is
responsible for the fact that Michael skakel averted criminal
prosecution all these years, but if that were true, one would also have
to accept the bizarre proposition that the Skakels used their own golf
club to frame themselves. Clearly, it is not the Skakels who got away
with the murder of Martha Moxley, it is Ken Littleton himself, and in
retrospect, there is not a single shred of doubt about that. Hindesight
is 20/20, and in the case of the murder of Martha Moxley, Ken
Littleton's absolute involvement is not subject to any doubt at all.
Consider the alternative.
Did the Skakels use their own golf club to direct attention to a member
of their own family? Did they plant a piece of the evidence in the
attic, just so that they could use it, if ever anybody needed evidence
against them?
http://www.geocities.com/askwebprowler/dunne.htm
The bankers that really rule the world have for the last 40 years
ordered the media to go after the kennedys. The bankers have never
forgiven JFK for trying to simply print money as opposed to borrowing
money (with interest) from the banks.
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
13 Oct 2005 07:11:15 PM |
|
|
Skakel would have been in jail from Day One awaiting trial had he
not been a Kennedy. Look at how O.J. Simpson was jailed for over a
year until his trial was over - even though he was eventually
acquitted. And - for true "nobodies" - they get charged in murders and
held without bond without a second thought.
Save on gas! Shop the http://stores.ebay.com/INTERNET-GUN-SHOW
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
13 Oct 2005 08:19:09 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Skakel would have been in jail from Day One awaiting trial had he
not been a Kennedy. Look at how O.J. Simpson was jailed for over a
year until his trial was over - even though he was eventually
acquitted. And - for true "nobodies" - they get charged in murders and
held without bond without a second thought.
Save on gas! Shop the http://stores.ebay.com/INTERNET-GUN-SHOW
NOT QUITE.
It is commonly understood that Skakel tutor, Kenneth Littleton is the
most bizarre character in the Moxley murder case. A winning young man
with a promising future before the murder, Littleton crumbled in the
wake of the crime. The evidence clearly proves that his first day on
the job was the beginning of his ruination, but we typically ignore the
question "why?"
Why did a young guy with an apparently bright future ahead of himself,
decent into a life of alcoholism and crime? The answer is really very
simple -it's called mental illness.
On the surface, Littleton had a bright future ahead of him. On october
30, 1975, when Martha Moxley was brutally murdered, Ken Littleton was a
23 years old, recent graduate of the prestigious Williams College in
Massachusetts. He had been a strong student and gifted rugby player who
easily landed a post at the Brunswick School, a private Greenwich
academy which several of the Skakel boys attended.
He was a large man, the football coach at Brunswick, and his athletic
build invariably attracted Rushton Skakel, who hired him as a live-in
tutor. clearly, it would take a strong man like Ken to tame the wild
Skakel brothers, but mental illness is tragic, unfulfilled promise.
The phrase that best describes Ken Littleton on October 30, 1075, is,
"He was never the same man after that night." The phrase that best
describes skinny, 15 year old Michael Skakel on October 30, 1975 is,
"He got so drunk he could not even stand on his own feet." Clearly,
"blind drunk and stumbling" is not the character sketch of the person
who murdered Martha Moxley on October 30, 1975, but it was certainly a
clear sign that Ken Littleton, who was supposed to be in charge, had
lost control. The Skakel brothers were merely being themselves.
Anybody familiar with the autopsy and the crime scene evidence of the
Martha Moxley murder knows that a strong man like Ken Littleton was
clearly responsible for her death. The golf club was merely used to pin
the blame on those who were too drunk to be able to defend themselves.
In February 1992, Littleton admited that he may have confessed to
killing Moxley with a golf club, but he later claimed that his
confession was due to "intense psychological pressure."
"I had been drinking heavily and was psychotic ... it was kind of
frightening," Littleton is heard saying on a recording where he
attempted to retract his confession. "This was when I said I did it. I
was in the bottom of a bottle looking around imagining what happened
and placed myself in the spot."
Ironic, isn't it? Michael Skakel was in fact the one who was too drunk
to walk on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered, yet Ken Littleton
blames a 15 year old for a sophisticated crime that has been
successfully covered up for the past 30 years?
Now that's what you call a real lunatic.
When the Skakels moved out of Belle Haven, a piece of the Golf Club
that Ken Littleton had kept to remind the Skakels that their property
was the ostensible murder weapon, was mysteriously found in the attic.
On November 2, 1975, Greenwich detectives removed a set of golf clubs
matching the murder weapon from the Skakel home and put out a
nationwide APB for a missing portion of the golf club.
The fact that the police never found the missing piece is as relevant
today, as it was on November 2, 1975.
If Ken Littleton is not a suspect, we have to assume that the Skakels
used their own golf club to direct attention to a member of their own
family? Did they plant a piece of the evidence in the attic, just so
they could use it, if ever anybody needed evidence against them? In the
final analysis, the evidence fits like a glove, and Ken Littleton
pretends that it is too tight because Michael Skakel was too drunk to
notice.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Aunt Judy likes it in the rear" |
|
| Title: How are things at the bath house, ***** sucker? |
06 Oct 2005 08:02:49 PM |
|
|
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
<snip>
The bankers that really rule the world have for the last 40 years
ordered the media to go after the kennedys. The bankers have never
forgiven JFK for trying to simply print money as opposed to borrowing
money (with interest) from the banks.
That's because simply printing money is an extremely moronic idea,
*****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
06 Oct 2005 12:17:56 PM |
|
|
silly distractions are irritating.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Aunt Judy likes it in the rear" |
|
| Title: Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
06 Oct 2005 08:03:29 PM |
|
|
Nick wrote:
silly distractions are irritating.
One of the best things about being deluded is you don't have to worry
about silly distractions.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
07 Oct 2005 09:08:02 AM |
|
|
Aunt Judy likes it in the rear wrote:
Nick wrote:
silly distractions are irritating.
One of the best things about being deluded is you don't have to worry
about silly distractions.
NOTHING SILLY HERE:
http://www.geocities.com/askwebprowler/sutton.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
11 Oct 2005 09:07:48 AM |
|
|
great info
.
|
|
|
| User: "Nick" |
|
| Title: Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
13 Oct 2005 06:47:28 AM |
|
|
It is commonly understood that Skakel tutor, Kenneth Littleton is the
most bizarre character in the Moxley murder case. A winning young man
with a promising future before the murder, Littleton crumbled in the
wake of the crime. The evidence clearly proves that his first day on
the job was the beginning of his ruination, but we typically ignore the
question "why?"
Why did a young guy with an apparently bright future ahead of himself,
decent into a life of alcoholism and crime? The answer is really very
simple -it's called mental illness.
On the surface, Littleton had a bright future ahead of him. on october
30, 1975, when Martha Moxley was brutally murdered, Ken Littleton was a
23 years old, recent graduate of the prestigious Williams College in
Massachusetts.
On Oct. 30, 1975, Littleton was 23 and a recent graduate of prestigious
Williams He had been a strong student and gifted rugby player who
easily landed post at the Brunswick School, a private Greenwich academy
which several of the Skakel boys attended.
He was a large man, the football coach at Brunswick, and his athletic
build invariably attracted Rushton Skakel, who hired him as a live-in
tutor. clearly, it would take a strong man like Ken to tame the wild
Skakel brothers, but mental illness is tragic, unfulfilled promise.
The phrase that best describes Ken Littleton on October 30, 1075, is,
"He was never the same man after that night." The phrase that best
describes skinny, 15 year old Michael Skakel on October 30, 1975 is,
"He was so drunk he could not even stand on his own feet." Clearly,
"blind drunk and stumbling" is not the character sketch of the person
who murdered Martha Moxley on October 30, 1975, but it was certainly a
clear sign that Ken Littleton, who was supposed to be in charge, had
lost control. The Skakels were merely being themselves.
Anybody familiar with the autopsy and the crime scene evidence of the
Martha Moxley murder knows that a strong man like Ken Littleton was
clearly responsible for her death. The golf club was merely used to pin
the blame on those who were too drunk to be able to defend themselves.
In February 1992, Littleton admited that he may have confessed to
killing Moxley with a golf club, but he claimed that his confession was
due to "intense psychological pressure."
"I had been drinking heavily and was psychotic ... it was kind of
frightening," Littleton is heard saying on the recording. "This was
when I said I did it. I was in the bottom of a bottle looking around
imagining what happened and placed myself in the spot."
Isn't it ironic? Michael Skakel was in fact the one who was too drunk
to walk on the night that Martha Moxley was murdered, yet Ken Littleton
blames a 15 year old for a sophisticated crime that has been
successfully covered up for the past 30 years?
Now that's what you call a real lunatic.
When the Skakels moved out of Belle Haven, a piece of the Golf Club
that Ken Littleton had kept to remind the Skakels that their property
was the ostensible murder weapon, was mysteriously found in the attic.
On November 2, 1975, Greenwich detectives removed a set of golf clubs
matching the murder weapon from the Skakel home and put out a
nationwide APB for a missing portion of the golf club.
The fact that the police never found the missing piece is as relevant
today, as it was on November 2, 1975.
If Ken Littleton is not a suspect, we have to assume that the Skakels
used their own golf club to direct attention to a member of their own
family? Did they plant a piece of the evidence in the attic, just so
they could use it, if ever anybody needed evidence against them? In the
final analysis, the evidence fits like a glove, and Ken Littleton
pretends that it is too tight because Michael Skakel was too drunk to
notice.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Would Michael Skakel be in prison if the Kennedys were not hated? |
13 Oct 2005 06:36:39 PM |
|
|
Ken Littleton is a sophisticated OJ.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
