| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
21 Jun 2006 08:17:22 PM |
| Object: |
Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/21/santorum-wmd/
June 21, 2006
Santorum: We Found the WMD
Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) took to the microphone today to announce a
shocking discovery -- that WMD have been found in Iraq:
Congressman Hoekstra and I are here today to say that we have found
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons.
.... Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500
weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent.
Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq’s pre-Gulf War
chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical
munitions are assessed to still exist.
The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to
determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq.
After a year and half of meticulously combing through the country,
here’s what the administration’s own inspectors reported:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol3_cw_key-findings.htm
While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been
discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared
chemical weapons stockpile in 1991.
There are no credible Indications that Baghdad resumed production of
chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s
desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear
of force against it should WMD be discovered.
The White House should immediately announce whether it stands with
Santorum or whether it stands behind the review conducted by Charles
Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group.
Recall, in October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer’s analysis:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14897-2004Oct7?language=printer
The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a
comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay
that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were
there.
Fox News isn’t waiting for an administration statement.
Their right wing pundits are already peddling the story as truth.
Host John Gibson: "Sen. Rick Santorum announcing a startling find --
In fact, WMDs were found in Iraq."
_________________________________________________________
Give the kid his pacifier and tuck him in.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
22 Jun 2006 08:17:01 PM |
|
|
Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) took to the microphone today to announce a
shocking discovery -- that WMD have been found in Iraq:
It's amusing. These were shells that were already cataloged as
being part of the destroyed and trashed munitions prior to 1991.
Yet FOX "News" run it as if it was a story, including a "BREAKING NEWS!"
banner -- like any propaganda fascist State.
---
http://www.skeptictank.org/mine006.jpg
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Amy Likes Pot!" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
22 Jun 2006 12:03:06 PM |
|
|
Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/21/santorum-wmd/
June 21, 2006
Santorum: We Found the WMD
Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) took to the microphone today to announce a
shocking discovery -- that WMD have been found in Iraq:
Congressman Hoekstra and I are here today to say that we have found
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons.
... Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500
weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent.
Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq’s pre-Gulf War
chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical
munitions are assessed to still exist.
The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to
determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq.
After a year and half of meticulously combing through the country,
here’s what the administration’s own inspectors reported:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/is
g-final-report_vol3_cw_key-findings.htm
While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been
discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared
chemical weapons stockpile in 1991.
There are no credible Indications that Baghdad resumed production of
chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s
desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear
of force against it should WMD be discovered.
The White House should immediately announce whether it stands with
Santorum or whether it stands behind the review conducted by Charles
Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group.
Recall, in October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer’s analysis:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14897-2004Oct7?language=printer
The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a
comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay
that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were
there.
Fox News isn’t waiting for an administration statement.
Their right wing pundits are already peddling the story as truth.
Host John Gibson: "Sen. Rick Santorum announcing a startling find --
In fact, WMDs were found in Iraq."
_________________________________________________________
Give the kid his pacifier and tuck him in.
Harry
I don't know who is more stupid: Rick "Man-on-Dog" Santorum, FOX News, or
the retarded population who are going to beleive this crap. Lets see - if
there were WMDs why didn't Saddam use them when we invaded? WHY aren't
they being used now, three years after the invation??? WHY IS
RICK-THE-***** STILL A SENATOR???
.
|
|
|
| User: "JustLooking" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
22 Jun 2006 12:17:20 PM |
|
|
I don't know who is more stupid: Rick "Man-on-Dog" Santorum, FOX News, or
the retarded population who are going to beleive this crap.
BAD NEWS, PAL!
Population IS retarded!
"Amy Likes Pot!" <im420amy@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:20060622130306.927$zH@newsreader.com...
Harry Hope <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/21/santorum-wmd/
June 21, 2006
Santorum: We Found the WMD
Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) took to the microphone today to announce a
shocking discovery -- that WMD have been found in Iraq:
Congressman Hoekstra and I are here today to say that we have found
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons.
... Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500
weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent.
Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War
chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical
munitions are assessed to still exist.
The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to
determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq.
After a year and half of meticulously combing through the country,
here's what the administration's own inspectors reported:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/is
g-final-report_vol3_cw_key-findings.htm
While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been
discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared
chemical weapons stockpile in 1991.
There are no credible Indications that Baghdad resumed production of
chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad's
desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear
of force against it should WMD be discovered.
The White House should immediately announce whether it stands with
Santorum or whether it stands behind the review conducted by Charles
Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group.
Recall, in October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer's analysis:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14897-2004Oct7?language=printer
The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a
comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay
that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were
there.
Fox News isn't waiting for an administration statement.
Their right wing pundits are already peddling the story as truth.
Host John Gibson: "Sen. Rick Santorum announcing a startling find --
In fact, WMDs were found in Iraq."
_________________________________________________________
Give the kid his pacifier and tuck him in.
Harry
I don't know who is more stupid: Rick "Man-on-Dog" Santorum, FOX News, or
the retarded population who are going to beleive this crap. Lets see - if
there were WMDs why didn't Saddam use them when we invaded? WHY aren't
they being used now, three years after the invation??? WHY IS
RICK-THE-***** STILL A SENATOR???
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
21 Jun 2006 08:31:23 PM |
|
|
What they "found" were pre-first Gulf War munitions the U.N. had known
about and had cataloged.
They were harmless. One group of insurgents exploded one and no one was
affected.
Harry Hope wrote:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/06/21/santorum-wmd/
June 21, 2006
Santorum: We Found the WMD
Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) took to the microphone today to announce a
shocking discovery -- that WMD have been found in Iraq:
Congressman Hoekstra and I are here today to say that we have found
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons.
... Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500
weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent.
Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq’s pre-Gulf War
chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical
munitions are assessed to still exist.
The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to
determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq.
After a year and half of meticulously combing through the country,
here’s what the administration’s own inspectors reported:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol3_cw_key-findings.htm
While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been
discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared
chemical weapons stockpile in 1991.
There are no credible Indications that Baghdad resumed production of
chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s
desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear
of force against it should WMD be discovered.
The White House should immediately announce whether it stands with
Santorum or whether it stands behind the review conducted by Charles
Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group.
Recall, in October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer’s analysis:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A14897-2004Oct7?language=printer
The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a
comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay
that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were
there.
Fox News isn’t waiting for an administration statement.
Their right wing pundits are already peddling the story as truth.
Host John Gibson: "Sen. Rick Santorum announcing a startling find --
In fact, WMDs were found in Iraq."
_________________________________________________________
Give the kid his pacifier and tuck him in.
Harry
--
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do,
because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."
- Susan B. Anthony, 1896
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bothriopsis Medusa" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
22 Jun 2006 05:35:11 AM |
|
|
Your are hereby under arrest for treason.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be
used against you in a court of law. You have the right to be speak to an
attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If you
cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government
expense. Do you understand?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Political Pagan" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
21 Jun 2006 11:31:15 PM |
|
|
Bothriopsis Medusa <beekeeper@hero.org> wrote in
news:e7cru6$nrc$1@news.datemas.de:
Your are hereby under arrest for treason.
You are hereby reported to the Department of Defense ViperShit. Why? For
claiming to be an officer in the military, which carries a bit of jail
time.
--
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we
are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and
servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public." - Theodore Roosevelt
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jmcgill" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
21 Jun 2006 11:06:36 PM |
|
|
Bothriopsis Medusa wrote:
Do you understand?
Of course, the only correct answer to the Miranda question is "No."
Even law professors have differing understandings of the rights as they
are read.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
21 Jun 2006 08:39:30 PM |
|
|
DiaperShit wrote:
This is not the first time that such chemical shells have been found in
Iraq. Fox News announced in May 2004 that a sarin gas shell had been
detonated near Fallujah, dispersing a small amount of agent. It was not
evident that the insurgents using the shell understood what they were using.
The discovery of poorly accounted for stocks of WMD is not unheard of
around the world. Researcher Jonathan Tucker detailed in 2001 for the
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists the discovery of a significant number
of chemical weapons shells in Northwest DC.
Think Progress counters Santorum's announcement with the words of
President Bush backing up reports by his own WMD inspectors which said
that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.
"While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been
discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared
chemical weapons stockpile in 1991," the Iraq Survey Group reported in
2004. "There are no credible Indications that Baghdad resumed production
of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to
Baghdad's desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or
its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered."
"The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a
comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay
that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were
there," said President Bush in October of 2004, as cited at Think Progress.
http://tinyurl.com/j69ql
The Bush administration commissioned the Iraq Survey Group to determine
whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq. After a year and half of
meticulously combing through the country, here’s what the
administration’s own inspectors reported:
While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been
discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared
chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible Indications
that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a
policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or
rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be
discovered.
The White House should immediately announce whether it stands with
Santorum or whether it stands behind the review conducted by Charles
Duelfer and the Iraq Survey Group. Recall, in October 2004, Bush said of
Duelfer’s analysis:
The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a
comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of David Kay
that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were
there.
www.thinkprogress.org
--
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do,
because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."
- Susan B. Anthony, 1896
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "The PretZel" |
|
| Title: Re: Rectum Santorum sez -- Whoopee, we...uh...found some...um...WMDs |
21 Jun 2006 09:22:46 PM |
|
|
On 2006-06-22 03:35:11 -0700, Bothriopsis Medusa <beekeeper@hero.org> said:
Your are hereby under arrest for treason.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be
used against you in a court of law. You have the right to be speak to
an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. If
you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government
expense. Do you understand?
How's the Wife, DiaperShit?
--
The PREMIER of "An Evening With a Rightard" Part one!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp4o_eHOKF8
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
