"Dale Eastman" <dalereastman@sprintmail.com>
rarebit@slipgate.com wrote:
"Dale Eastman" <dalereastman@sprintmail.com>
Dale Eastman wrote:
cpt banjo wrote:
Dale Eastman wrote:
The sovereign citizen REFUSES to hand over the gold coin. What do
you statist federal agents do now?
Why not ask Larken Rose?
Because I'd rather ask you why you planted that kiddie porn on his
computer in the first place. Well? Why did you?
June 17, 2004
A Montgomery County man who has publicly dared the Internal Revenue
Service to arrest him for not paying federal income taxes was charged
yesterday in federal court in Philadelphia with possession of child
pornography.
Publicly dared... IRS... income taxes...
charged... with.. [planted] child pornography.
Hmm?
Philidelphia Daily News
Posted on Thu, Jun. 17, 2004
Tax protester faces kiddie-porn charges
A Montgomery County man who has publicly dared the Internal Revenue
Service to arrest him for not paying federal income taxes was charged
yesterday in federal court in Philadelphia with possession of child
pornography.
IRS agents seized 10 computers from the Hollywood home of Larken Rose
more than a year ago, but have yet to charge the tax protester with any tax
crimes. The child pornography was "inadvertently discovered" by an IRS agent
who
was examining one of the computer's hard drives, an FBI agent alleged.
FBI agent Beatrice A. DeFazio said the computer images contained explicit
sexual situations involving underage girls.
The agent said there is "probable cause" to believe that Rose downloaded
the kiddie porn from the Internet because the pictures were stored in the
same
computer file "where partially nude images of his wife" were also stored."
Neither Rose nor his wife could be reached last night.
Jim Smith
red pill:
http://www.861.info.tax.scams <--- "They" don't want you to look
http://www.quatlosers.com
Larken Rose
When a scam gets rolling, all sorts of human cockroaches come out of the
woodwork to try to cash in. This is the perfect description of Larken Rose,
a scammer come lately to the world of tax protesting Not being smart enough
to come up with any unique theory of his own, Larken has simply latched on
to the "861" or "Income Can't Be Defined" arguments that end up with the
conclusion that only foreigners are required to pay income tax.
taxableincome.net 861.info
http://evans-legal.com/dan/tpfaq.html
The claim is that the Internal Revenue Code does not apply to most of the
income of citizens of the United States because the only definitions of
"sources of income" apply only to nonresident aliens and foreign
corporations. (See I.R.C. section 861 and its regulations.) This argument is
completely contrary to the express language of the Internal Revenue Code and
its regulations.
http://www.fraudsandscams.com
.
|
