| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
12 Aug 2006 08:30:23 AM |
| Object: |
Republicans hide behind terror |
From The Chicago Tribune, 8/11/06:
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/gop_ready_to_be.html
GOP: Ready to 'benefit' from terror
For an idea of how the Republican Party will approach the averted
terrorist assault on trans-Atlantic airliners this week, how that
might play into the fall election cycle in the United States, the
depth of research that Republicans are ready to bring to bear on their
races and the attacks that the GOP plans on its "cut-and-run''
opposition in the Democratic Party, the best place to go is the
Republican Party.
Here's a memo circulated by the National Republican Congressional
Committee today.
Read and see:
MEMO
To: GOP Campaigns
From: NRCC Communications
Re: Vigilance in the Global War on Terror
Date: August 11, 2006
__________________________________________________________________________
Recent events have reminded us that we continue to operate in a
pivotal phase in the Global War on Terror.
In the days to come, you should move to question your opponent's
commitment to the defeat of terror, and in turn, create a definitive
contrast on the issue.
You will certainly benefit from bringing into stark focus the
cut-and-run, surrender message that Democrats coast to coast are
currently -- and foolishly -- embracing.
To aid you in this effort, we are including three key votes related to
the War on Terror as well as materials provided by the RNC.
As always, please feel free to contact the NRCC Communications
Division at (202) 479-7070 if you have any questions.
* * *
__________________________________________________________
Those li'l wimpy Repugs sure are cute, ain't they.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Bob Eld" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans hide behind terror |
12 Aug 2006 09:59:41 AM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:a6mrd2d14k1tvelum0o1hh832jgpgsqkqi@4ax.com...
From The Chicago Tribune, 8/11/06:
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/gop_ready_to_be.ht
ml
GOP: Ready to 'benefit' from terror
For an idea of how the Republican Party will approach the averted
terrorist assault on trans-Atlantic airliners this week, how that
might play into the fall election cycle in the United States, the
depth of research that Republicans are ready to bring to bear on their
races and the attacks that the GOP plans on its "cut-and-run''
opposition in the Democratic Party, the best place to go is the
Republican Party.
Here's a memo circulated by the National Republican Congressional
Committee today.
Read and see:
MEMO
To: GOP Campaigns
From: NRCC Communications
Re: Vigilance in the Global War on Terror
Date: August 11, 2006
__________________________________________________________________________
Recent events have reminded us that we continue to operate in a
pivotal phase in the Global War on Terror.
In the days to come, you should move to question your opponent's
commitment to the defeat of terror, and in turn, create a definitive
contrast on the issue.
You will certainly benefit from bringing into stark focus the
cut-and-run, surrender message that Democrats coast to coast are
currently -- and foolishly -- embracing.
To aid you in this effort, we are including three key votes related to
the War on Terror as well as materials provided by the RNC.
As always, please feel free to contact the NRCC Communications
Division at (202) 479-7070 if you have any questions.
* * *
__________________________________________________________
Those li'l wimpy Repugs sure are cute, ain't they.
Harry
Do you suppose Americans are stupid enough to buy into it yet
again...probably, given how dumb and uniformed we are. Where the hell are
the Democrats pointing out that four years of war, 2600 dead Americans, over
$300billion spent, the jihadis are just as strong as ever plotting away? The
fact that these terrorists got as far as they did should illustrate to all
but the most ignorant that the "war on terror" has been less than effective.
Shouldn't the Dems be stating that a little more forcefully? They seem to be
playing dead once again. One definition of insanity is doing the same thing
over and over and expecting a different result. It is time for a change.
Bob
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bruce Olin" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans hide behind terror |
12 Aug 2006 10:20:02 AM |
|
|
"Bob Eld" <nsmontassoc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:x1mDg.6003$o27.4752@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
|
| "Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
| news:a6mrd2d14k1tvelum0o1hh832jgpgsqkqi@4ax.com...
| >
| > From The Chicago Tribune, 8/11/06:
| >
|
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/gop_ready_to_be.ht
| ml
| >
| > GOP: Ready to 'benefit' from terror
| >
| > For an idea of how the Republican Party will approach the averted
| > terrorist assault on trans-Atlantic airliners this week, how that
| > might play into the fall election cycle in the United States, the
| > depth of research that Republicans are ready to bring to bear on their
| > races and the attacks that the GOP plans on its "cut-and-run''
| > opposition in the Democratic Party, the best place to go is the
| > Republican Party.
| >
| > Here's a memo circulated by the National Republican Congressional
| > Committee today.
| >
| > Read and see:
| >
| > MEMO
| >
| >
| > To: GOP Campaigns
| >
| >
| > From: NRCC Communications
| >
| >
| > Re: Vigilance in the Global War on Terror
| >
| >
| > Date: August 11, 2006
| >
| >
__________________________________________________________________________
| >
| >
| > Recent events have reminded us that we continue to operate in a
| > pivotal phase in the Global War on Terror.
| >
| > In the days to come, you should move to question your opponent's
| > commitment to the defeat of terror, and in turn, create a definitive
| > contrast on the issue.
| >
| > You will certainly benefit from bringing into stark focus the
| > cut-and-run, surrender message that Democrats coast to coast are
| > currently -- and foolishly -- embracing.
| >
| > To aid you in this effort, we are including three key votes related to
| > the War on Terror as well as materials provided by the RNC.
| >
| > As always, please feel free to contact the NRCC Communications
| > Division at (202) 479-7070 if you have any questions.
| >
| > * * *
| >
| > __________________________________________________________
| >
| > Those li'l wimpy Repugs sure are cute, ain't they.
| >
| > Harry
|
| Do you suppose Americans are stupid enough to buy into it yet
| again...probably, given how dumb and uniformed we are. Where the hell are
| the Democrats pointing out that four years of war, 2600 dead Americans,
over
| $300billion spent, the jihadis are just as strong as ever plotting away?
The
| fact that these terrorists got as far as they did should illustrate to all
| but the most ignorant that the "war on terror" has been less than
effective.
| Shouldn't the Dems be stating that a little more forcefully? They seem to
be
| playing dead once again. One definition of insanity is doing the same
thing
| over and over and expecting a different result. It is time for a change.
| Bob
|
|
Speaking of insanity... It reminds me of the old joke... Question: Does
your aunt Ida still think she is a chicken?
Answer: Yes.
Question: Why don't you put her through therapy?
Answer: We need the eggs.
New translation:
Question: Does the US still believe it is fighting a "War on Terror"?
Answer: Yes.
Question: Why doesn't it face reality?
Answer: We need the oil.
Bruce Olin
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans hide behind terror |
12 Aug 2006 11:01:29 PM |
|
|
Bruce Olin wrote:
"Bob Eld" <nsmontassoc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:x1mDg.6003$o27.4752@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
|
| "Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
| news:a6mrd2d14k1tvelum0o1hh832jgpgsqkqi@4ax.com...
| >
| > From The Chicago Tribune, 8/11/06:
|
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/gop_ready_to_be.ht
| ml
| >
| > GOP: Ready to 'benefit' from terror
| >
| > For an idea of how the Republican Party will approach the averted
| > terrorist assault on trans-Atlantic airliners this week, how that
| > might play into the fall election cycle in the United States, the
| > depth of research that Republicans are ready to bring to bear on their
| > races and the attacks that the GOP plans on its "cut-and-run''
| > opposition in the Democratic Party, the best place to go is the
| > Republican Party.
| >
| > Here's a memo circulated by the National Republican Congressional
| > Committee today.
| >
| > Read and see:
| >
| > MEMO
| >
| > To: GOP Campaigns
| >
| > From: NRCC Communications
| >
| > Re: Vigilance in the Global War on Terror
| >
| > Date: August 11, 2006
| >
| > Recent events have reminded us that we continue to operate in a
| > pivotal phase in the Global War on Terror.
| >
| > In the days to come, you should move to question your opponent's
| > commitment to the defeat of terror, and in turn, create a definitive
| > contrast on the issue.
| >
| > You will certainly benefit from bringing into stark focus the
| > cut-and-run, surrender message that Democrats coast to coast are
| > currently -- and foolishly -- embracing.
| >
| > To aid you in this effort, we are including three key votes related to
| > the War on Terror as well as materials provided by the RNC.
| >
| > As always, please feel free to contact the NRCC Communications
| > Division at (202) 479-7070 if you have any questions.
| >
| > __________________________________________________________
| >
| > Those li'l wimpy Repugs sure are cute, ain't they.
| >
| > Harry
|
| Do you suppose Americans are stupid enough to buy into it yet
| again...probably, given how dumb and uniformed we are. Where the hell are
| the Democrats pointing out that four years of war, 2600 dead Americans,
over
| $300billion spent, the jihadis are just as strong as ever plotting away?
The
| fact that these terrorists got as far as they did should illustrate to all
| but the most ignorant that the "war on terror" has been less than
effective.
| Shouldn't the Dems be stating that a little more forcefully? They seem to
be
| playing dead once again. One definition of insanity is doing the same
thing
| over and over and expecting a different result. It is time for a change.
Speaking of insanity... It reminds me of the old joke... Question: Does
your aunt Ida still think she is a chicken?
Answer: Yes.
Question: Why don't you put her through therapy?
Answer: We need the eggs.
New translation:
Question: Does the US still believe it is fighting a "War on Terror"?
Answer: Yes.
Question: Why doesn't it face reality?
Answer: We need the oil.
Heh - perhaps that should be "We need the votes"
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans hide behind terror |
12 Aug 2006 03:49:00 PM |
|
|
Bob Eld wrote:
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:a6mrd2d14k1tvelum0o1hh832jgpgsqkqi@4ax.com...
From The Chicago Tribune, 8/11/06:
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/gop_ready_to
_be.ht ml
GOP: Ready to 'benefit' from terror
For an idea of how the Republican Party will approach the averted
terrorist assault on trans-Atlantic airliners this week, how that
might play into the fall election cycle in the United States, the
depth of research that Republicans are ready to bring to bear on
their races and the attacks that the GOP plans on its "cut-and-run''
opposition in the Democratic Party, the best place to go is the
Republican Party.
Here's a memo circulated by the National Republican Congressional
Committee today.
Read and see:
MEMO
To: GOP Campaigns
From: NRCC Communications
Re: Vigilance in the Global War on Terror
Date: August 11, 2006
____________________________________________________________________
______
Recent events have reminded us that we continue to operate in a
pivotal phase in the Global War on Terror.
In the days to come, you should move to question your opponent's
commitment to the defeat of terror, and in turn, create a definitive
contrast on the issue.
You will certainly benefit from bringing into stark focus the
cut-and-run, surrender message that Democrats coast to coast are
currently -- and foolishly -- embracing.
To aid you in this effort, we are including three key votes related
to the War on Terror as well as materials provided by the RNC.
As always, please feel free to contact the NRCC Communications
Division at (202) 479-7070 if you have any questions.
* * *
__________________________________________________________
Those li'l wimpy Repugs sure are cute, ain't they.
Harry
Do you suppose Americans are stupid enough to buy into it yet
again...probably, given how dumb and uniformed we are. Where the hell
are the Democrats pointing out that four years of war, 2600 dead
Americans, over $300billion spent, the jihadis are just as strong as
ever plotting away?
don't link Iraq with the WoT - that is the Reichbugs game.
The fact that these terrorists got as far as they
did should illustrate to all but the most ignorant that the "war on
terror" has been less than effective.
I dissagree, they didn't "get far" because we didn't know about them.
They were ALLOWED to "get far", so as to cast a net of evidence which
will be used in the British Courts to put away these Alledged
Terrorists for a VERY LONG TIME.
They were monitored and had an undercover agent in their group for over
a year.
this was a proffesional bust - I a commend all involved in saving the
lives of so many.
Dems need to jump on this NOW! Commend the agents involved and HAMMER
AWAY THAT THE WAR WILL BE FOUGHT AND WON THROUGH LAW ENFORCEMENT,
They need to HAMMER AWAY THAT IT WILL ALSO BE LOST USING THE MILITARY,
who's track record remains zero.
Armies are great at invading and taking land - they SUCK at tracking
down terrorists.
Dems NEED TO GET A FUCKING CLUE........or they will LOSE AGAIN IN NOV.
Shouldn't the Dems be stating
that a little more forcefully?
They need to separate Iraqnam out from the WoT - AND they need to
endorse the Law Enforcement model and condemn the military model WRT to
the WoT.
They are doing NEITHER!
fools.
They seem to be playing dead once
again. One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and
over and expecting a different result. It is time for a change. Bob
dems will get what they deserve in the end.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans hide behind terror |
12 Aug 2006 09:24:50 AM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:a6mrd2d14k1tvelum0o1hh832jgpgsqkqi@4ax.com...
From The Chicago Tribune, 8/11/06:
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/gop_ready_to_be.html
GOP: Ready to 'benefit' from terror
For an idea of how the Republican Party will approach the averted
terrorist assault on trans-Atlantic airliners this week, how that
might play into the fall election cycle in the United States, the
depth of research that Republicans are ready to bring to bear on their
races and the attacks that the GOP plans on its "cut-and-run''
opposition in the Democratic Party, the best place to go is the
Republican Party.
Here's a memo circulated by the National Republican Congressional
Committee today.
Read and see:
MEMO
To: GOP Campaigns
From: NRCC Communications
Re: Vigilance in the Global War on Terror
Date: August 11, 2006
__________________________________________________________________________
Recent events have reminded us that we continue to operate in a
pivotal phase in the Global War on Terror.
Exactly what constitutes a "pivitol point" in a corrupt, misname, imaginary
war?
In the days to come, you should move to question your opponent's
commitment to the defeat of terror, and in turn, create a definitive
contrast on the issue.
You will certainly benefit from bringing into stark focus the
cut-and-run, surrender message that Democrats coast to coast are
currently -- and foolishly -- embracing.
Of course, Democrats are embracing no such thing ....that's only yet another
republican lie/PR ploy!
To aid you in this effort, we are including three key votes related to
the War on Terror as well as materials provided by the RNC.
As always, please feel free to contact the NRCC Communications
Division at (202) 479-7070 if you have any questions.
Yes - one ...... do you guys EVER tell the truth?
* * *
__________________________________________________________
Those li'l wimpy Repugs sure are cute, ain't they.
Harry
.
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans hide behind terror |
12 Aug 2006 10:13:24 AM |
|
|
ZenIsWhen wrote:
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:a6mrd2d14k1tvelum0o1hh832jgpgsqkqi@4ax.com...
From The Chicago Tribune, 8/11/06:
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/gop_ready_
to_be.html
GOP: Ready to 'benefit' from terror
For an idea of how the Republican Party will approach the averted
terrorist assault on trans-Atlantic airliners this week, how that
might play into the fall election cycle in the United States, the
depth of research that Republicans are ready to bring to bear on
their races and the attacks that the GOP plans on its "cut-and-run''
opposition in the Democratic Party, the best place to go is the
Republican Party.
Here's a memo circulated by the National Republican Congressional
Committee today.
Read and see:
MEMO
To: GOP Campaigns
From: NRCC Communications
Re: Vigilance in the Global War on Terror
Date: August 11, 2006
____________________________________________________________________
______
Recent events have reminded us that we continue to operate in a
pivotal phase in the Global War on Terror.
Exactly what constitutes a "pivitol point" in a corrupt, misname,
imaginary war?
denying the WoT will not get the Democracts elected.
if you want them to remove the Reichbugs you will have to come up with
a much better plan than that.
In the days to come, you should move to question your opponent's
commitment to the defeat of terror, and in turn, create a definitive
contrast on the issue.
You will certainly benefit from bringing into stark focus the
cut-and-run, surrender message that Democrats coast to coast are
currently -- and foolishly -- embracing.
Of course, Democrats are embracing no such thing ....that's only yet
another republican lie/PR ploy!
Dems need to hammer home that Iraq is not and has nothing to do with
the WoT - and in fact henders that War by pulling blood and treasure
out of the WoT effort.
need to hammer home the Law Enforcement works Armies don't them also.
Dumb dems are doing neither!!
To aid you in this effort, we are including three key votes related
to the War on Terror as well as materials provided by the RNC.
As always, please feel free to contact the NRCC Communications
Division at (202) 479-7070 if you have any questions.
Yes - one ...... do you guys EVER tell the truth?
* * *
__________________________________________________________
Those li'l wimpy Repugs sure are cute, ain't they.
Harry
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "gaffo" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans hide behind terror |
12 Aug 2006 10:08:24 AM |
|
|
Harry Hope wrote:
From The Chicago Tribune, 8/11/06:
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/news_theswamp/2006/08/gop_ready_to
_be.html
GOP: Ready to 'benefit' from terror
For an idea of how the Republican Party will approach the averted
terrorist assault on trans-Atlantic airliners this week, how that
might play into the fall election cycle in the United States, the
depth of research that Republicans are ready to bring to bear on their
races and the attacks that the GOP plans on its "cut-and-run''
opposition in the Democratic Party, the best place to go is the
Republican Party.
Here's a memo circulated by the National Republican Congressional
Committee today.
Read and see:
MEMO
To: GOP Campaigns
From: NRCC Communications
Re: Vigilance in the Global War on Terror
Date: August 11, 2006
______________________________________________________________________
____
Recent events have reminded us that we continue to operate in a
pivotal phase in the Global War on Terror.
In the days to come, you should move to question your opponent's
commitment to the defeat of terror, and in turn, create a definitive
contrast on the issue.
You will certainly benefit from bringing into stark focus the
cut-and-run, surrender message that Democrats coast to coast are
currently -- and foolishly -- embracing.
To aid you in this effort, we are including three key votes related to
the War on Terror as well as materials provided by the RNC.
As always, please feel free to contact the NRCC Communications
Division at (202) 479-7070 if you have any questions.
* * *
__________________________________________________________
Those li'l wimpy Repugs sure are cute, ain't they.
Harry
yep.
simple way to defeat this stance - if the dems were smart - which they
still seem to NOT be.
Simply state that the WoT was/is and always shall be one of Law
Enforcment - as the dems have always stated.
Unlike the GOP which thinks the WoT is about using Armies, which only
results in getting bogged down in civil wars instead of dealing with
the terrorists.
GOP is against the Law Enforcement model, even when it has shown to
work over and over and over in busting terrorist cells.
--
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
