| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
05 Aug 2006 09:53:36 AM |
| Object: |
Republicans run for their political lives from their glorious leader. |
From The Washingington Post, 8/5/06:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/04/AR2006080401807.html?nav=rss_email/components
GOP Candidates Claim Degrees Of Separation From President
By Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, August 5, 2006; Page A01
On Capitol Hill, Rep. Mark Kennedy (Minn.) and Sen. James M. Talent
(Mo.) are known as loyal Republican soldiers, reliable votes for
President Bush on tax cuts and the Iraq war.
In elections past, they have aired advertisements featuring the
president and have stumped with him at public rallies.
This year, both are running for Senate seats, but their television ads
have made no mention of Bush -- and have been conspicuous in
distancing the candidates from their partisan affiliation.
"Most people don't care if you're red or blue, Republican or
Democrat," Talent's ad states. A recent ad from Kennedy says,
"He doesn't do what the party says to."
For months, political analysts have waited to see how GOP candidates
would navigate the challenge of running in the face of what polls show
are dismal approval ratings for Bush and the Republican-led Congress.
The ads give an answer:
Endangered candidates are presenting themselves as independent-minded
problem solvers who are not part of Washington's partisan wars.
Even Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds, who heads the National Republican
Congressional Committee, has run TV ads in his Buffalo area district
that do not identify his party affiliation.
These Republicans have hardly broken with Bush.
Talent and Kennedy, after all, have invited him into their states this
year to help raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for their
campaigns.
But their tactics are representative of the diverse ways, large and
small, that Republican candidates are trying to put distance between
themselves and the president and his most unpopular policies.
Last week, Maryland GOP Senate candidate Michael S. Steele caused a
tempest with his comments knocking Bush for the Iraq war and the
administration's handling of Hurricane Katrina.
The contrast could hardly be sharper from the last two election
cycles, when most Republican candidates were happy to be identified
with Bush, confident that his popularity with conservatives would
boost their own prospects.
This year more closely resembles 1994, the last time a party's
president and congressional leadership were simultaneously held in
such low regard.
Voters that year evicted Democrats from their 40-year control of the
House.
Steven S. Smith, a political scientist and congressional expert at
Washington University in St. Louis, said he believes that the new
Kennedy and Talent ads are harbingers of what to expect from other GOP
incumbents in tough races, such as Sens. Mike DeWine (Ohio) and Conrad
Burns (Mont.).
Their strategy, he said, is "to try to inoculate themselves against
the inevitable series of ads from their opponent charging them with
being Bushies."
"All these guys are trying to seem like reasonable, moderate guys who
are not the scary conservatives who their opponents will make them out
to be," Smith added.
"But they all have very conservative records and support for the
president that will make it difficult for them to duck this."
An adviser to Talent dismissed the idea that his candidate is trying
to distance himself from Bush, saying his strategy is different now
that he is the incumbent rather than the challenger trying to unseat a
senator, as he was four years ago.
"The president's not on the ballot, and the race is going to be
decided on Jim Talent's record in the U.S. Senate," said John Hancock,
a former executive director of the Missouri Republican Party.
GOP strategists, however, say there is little question that candidates
are looking to draw distinctions between themselves and Bush,
emphasizing their independence on issues such as embryonic stem cell
research and immigration.
"In the last two elections, you were able to run under President Bush
and that was an advantage," said one top GOP strategist, who insisted
on anonymity so as not to be seen as critical of the president.
"It's clear today that's unlikely to be the advantage that it was in
the past. A lot of candidates are trying to figure out how to deal
with that."
Thus, Rep. Heather A. Wilson (R), in a tough race in Albuquerque, is
positioning herself as an independent fighter for New Mexico, while
Rep. E. Clay Shaw Jr. (R) in Florida is casting himself as an
environmentalist who takes an independent stand in Congress.
Rep. Jim Gerlach (R), facing a strong challenge in his district near
Philadelphia, has run ads stating:
"When I believe President Bush is right, I'm behind him. But when I
think he is wrong, I let him know that."
All three have supported the president's positions in Congress less
often over the past three years, according to analyses of voting
records by Congressional Quarterly.
For now, a White House that once brooked little dissent from
Republicans appears to be taking a pragmatic approach to new
freelancing from GOP candidates.
Its attitude, GOP strategists say, is that candidates need to do what
is necessary to get reelected given the huge stakes involved -- though
there are limits to its tolerance.
White House aides did little to disguise their distress over Steele --
senior adviser Karl Rove called Steele to find out what happened,
sources said -- or recent critical comments by Sen. John Thune
(R-S.D.).
Vin Weber, a former congressman from Minnesota who remains active in
Republican Party affairs and close to the Bush administration, said he
thinks the White House is anxious that such comments could demoralize
conservative Republicans, voters he says the party must energize to
keep the elections close this fall.
"As much as this White House puts a premium on loyalty, I don't think
there would be a problem with a strategy that distances a candidate
from the president if it would result in winning an election that they
would otherwise lose," Weber said.
"The frustration is that they know this is a strategy that is not
going to work."
Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman, disputed the
notion that there is much room between candidates and the president,
noting the large number of fundraising events Bush, Laura Bush and
Vice President Cheney have been asked to attend for GOP candidates.
By the RNC's latest count, Bush has done 50 events for Republicans
this cycle, raising more than $160 million.
"What is unique about this cycle is not candidates distancing
themselves from the president but the unprecedented number of
Republicans who have asked this president to come in and campaign for
them," Mehlman said.
Many of Bush's events have been closed-door fundraisers rather than
rallies designed to garner publicity.
Meanwhile, Democrats are lining up to challenge those Republicans who
seek to play down their support for the president.
In Minnesota, the issue of presidential allegiance is already roiling
the race to succeed retiring Democratic Sen. Mark Dayton.
The race had been seen as a potential Republican pickup, but Rep.
Kennedy is trailing Democratic prosecutor Amy Klobuchar.
Kennedy has been considered a strong Bush ally since joining the House
in 2000, according to Minnesota political analysts, who say they are
surprised by his ads playing down party affiliation and making no
mention of the president.
A Minneapolis Star Tribune analysis this week found that Kennedy "has
seldom disagreed with Bush or voted against the Republican Party
line."
"This is a party guy," said political scientist Lawrence R. Jacobs of
the University of Minnesota.
"He ran in a district that leaned pretty heavily Republican, and the
way to win in that district is to run as a loyal Republican. Now he's
running in a statewide race where the president's approval ratings are
poor. . . . It's an attempt to reinvent himself."
Mehlman scoffed at that appraisal.
"I don't think what Mark Kennedy is doing is anything but being a
smart candidate," he said.
"Kennedy is talking about who he is -- he's an independent-minded
Republican."
___________________________________________________________
Help!! Outa our way!! Can't get too close to Georgie's *****!! He's one
o' yer baaaad Republicans.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "Bush, Wheres My SON?" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans run for their political lives from their glorious leader. |
06 Aug 2006 05:00:13 AM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:1ec9d2lhhqnupbkuif56rn3epa4mg00ji0@4ax.com...
From The Washingington Post, 8/5/06:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/04/AR2006080401807.html?nav=rss_email/components
GOP Candidates Claim Degrees Of Separation From President
By Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, August 5, 2006; Page A01
On Capitol Hill, Rep. Mark Kennedy (Minn.) and Sen. James M. Talent
(Mo.) are known as loyal Republican soldiers, reliable votes for
President Bush on tax cuts and the Iraq war.
In elections past, they have aired advertisements featuring the
president and have stumped with him at public rallies.
This year, both are running for Senate seats, but their television ads
have made no mention of Bush -- and have been conspicuous in
distancing the candidates from their partisan affiliation.
"Most people don't care if you're red or blue, Republican or
Democrat," Talent's ad states. A recent ad from Kennedy says,
"He doesn't do what the party says to."
For months, political analysts have waited to see how GOP candidates
would navigate the challenge of running in the face of what polls show
are dismal approval ratings for Bush and the Republican-led Congress.
The ads give an answer:
Endangered candidates are presenting themselves as independent-minded
problem solvers who are not part of Washington's partisan wars.
Even Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds, who heads the National Republican
Congressional Committee, has run TV ads in his Buffalo area district
that do not identify his party affiliation.
These Republicans have hardly broken with Bush.
Talent and Kennedy, after all, have invited him into their states this
year to help raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for their
campaigns.
But their tactics are representative of the diverse ways, large and
small, that Republican candidates are trying to put distance between
themselves and the president and his most unpopular policies.
Last week, Maryland GOP Senate candidate Michael S. Steele caused a
tempest with his comments knocking Bush for the Iraq war and the
administration's handling of Hurricane Katrina.
The contrast could hardly be sharper from the last two election
cycles, when most Republican candidates were happy to be identified
with Bush, confident that his popularity with conservatives would
boost their own prospects.
This year more closely resembles 1994, the last time a party's
president and congressional leadership were simultaneously held in
such low regard.
Voters that year evicted Democrats from their 40-year control of the
House.
Steven S. Smith, a political scientist and congressional expert at
Washington University in St. Louis, said he believes that the new
Kennedy and Talent ads are harbingers of what to expect from other GOP
incumbents in tough races, such as Sens. Mike DeWine (Ohio) and Conrad
Burns (Mont.).
Their strategy, he said, is "to try to inoculate themselves against
the inevitable series of ads from their opponent charging them with
being Bushies."
"All these guys are trying to seem like reasonable, moderate guys who
are not the scary conservatives who their opponents will make them out
to be," Smith added.
"But they all have very conservative records and support for the
president that will make it difficult for them to duck this."
An adviser to Talent dismissed the idea that his candidate is trying
to distance himself from Bush, saying his strategy is different now
that he is the incumbent rather than the challenger trying to unseat a
senator, as he was four years ago.
"The president's not on the ballot, and the race is going to be
decided on Jim Talent's record in the U.S. Senate," said John Hancock,
a former executive director of the Missouri Republican Party.
GOP strategists, however, say there is little question that candidates
are looking to draw distinctions between themselves and Bush,
emphasizing their independence on issues such as embryonic stem cell
research and immigration.
"In the last two elections, you were able to run under President Bush
and that was an advantage," said one top GOP strategist, who insisted
on anonymity so as not to be seen as critical of the president.
"It's clear today that's unlikely to be the advantage that it was in
the past. A lot of candidates are trying to figure out how to deal
with that."
Thus, Rep. Heather A. Wilson (R), in a tough race in Albuquerque, is
positioning herself as an independent fighter for New Mexico, while
Rep. E. Clay Shaw Jr. (R) in Florida is casting himself as an
environmentalist who takes an independent stand in Congress.
Rep. Jim Gerlach (R), facing a strong challenge in his district near
Philadelphia, has run ads stating:
"When I believe President Bush is right, I'm behind him. But when I
think he is wrong, I let him know that."
All three have supported the president's positions in Congress less
often over the past three years, according to analyses of voting
records by Congressional Quarterly.
For now, a White House that once brooked little dissent from
Republicans appears to be taking a pragmatic approach to new
freelancing from GOP candidates.
Its attitude, GOP strategists say, is that candidates need to do what
is necessary to get reelected given the huge stakes involved -- though
there are limits to its tolerance.
White House aides did little to disguise their distress over Steele --
senior adviser Karl Rove called Steele to find out what happened,
sources said -- or recent critical comments by Sen. John Thune
(R-S.D.).
Vin Weber, a former congressman from Minnesota who remains active in
Republican Party affairs and close to the Bush administration, said he
thinks the White House is anxious that such comments could demoralize
conservative Republicans, voters he says the party must energize to
keep the elections close this fall.
"As much as this White House puts a premium on loyalty, I don't think
there would be a problem with a strategy that distances a candidate
from the president if it would result in winning an election that they
would otherwise lose," Weber said.
"The frustration is that they know this is a strategy that is not
going to work."
Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman, disputed the
notion that there is much room between candidates and the president,
noting the large number of fundraising events Bush, Laura Bush and
Vice President Cheney have been asked to attend for GOP candidates.
By the RNC's latest count, Bush has done 50 events for Republicans
this cycle, raising more than $160 million.
"What is unique about this cycle is not candidates distancing
themselves from the president but the unprecedented number of
Republicans who have asked this president to come in and campaign for
them," Mehlman said.
Many of Bush's events have been closed-door fundraisers rather than
rallies designed to garner publicity.
Meanwhile, Democrats are lining up to challenge those Republicans who
seek to play down their support for the president.
In Minnesota, the issue of presidential allegiance is already roiling
the race to succeed retiring Democratic Sen. Mark Dayton.
The race had been seen as a potential Republican pickup, but Rep.
Kennedy is trailing Democratic prosecutor Amy Klobuchar.
Kennedy has been considered a strong Bush ally since joining the House
in 2000, according to Minnesota political analysts, who say they are
surprised by his ads playing down party affiliation and making no
mention of the president.
A Minneapolis Star Tribune analysis this week found that Kennedy "has
seldom disagreed with Bush or voted against the Republican Party
line."
"This is a party guy," said political scientist Lawrence R. Jacobs of
the University of Minnesota.
"He ran in a district that leaned pretty heavily Republican, and the
way to win in that district is to run as a loyal Republican. Now he's
running in a statewide race where the president's approval ratings are
poor. . . . It's an attempt to reinvent himself."
Mehlman scoffed at that appraisal.
"I don't think what Mark Kennedy is doing is anything but being a
smart candidate," he said.
"Kennedy is talking about who he is -- he's an independent-minded
Republican."
___________________________________________________________
Help!! Outa our way!! Can't get too close to Georgie's *****!! He's one
o' yer baaaad Republicans.
Harry
The advance of the Bush Cult must be stopped and end soon. What started as
a simple anti-American revolution by uninformed Clinton haters has now
become a threat to our well being due to Bush's mismanaged and ill informed
mediocre minority.
The stupidity and thugery and narrow-mindedness of the Bush Cult leads me to
thoroughly believe Bush and his followers want nothing less than the
destruction of our dearly beloved nation for selfish desires, where money
and power replace common sense and patriotism.
Bush should be arrested.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Republicans run for their political lives from their glorious leader. |
05 Aug 2006 10:46:58 AM |
|
|
Harry Hope wrote:
From The Washingington Post, 8/5/06:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/04/AR2006080401807.html?nav=rss_email/components
GOP Candidates Claim Degrees Of Separation From President
Yeah..
But can they run away from their own rubberstampin voting records?
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|