| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
21 Aug 2006 09:01:36 PM |
| Object: |
Right Wing lunatics swiftboat Judge Anna Diggs Taylor |
http://houseoflabor.tpmcafe.com/blog/rockthrower/2006/aug/21/judge_taylor_gets_fringed
Aug 21, 2006
Judge Taylor Gets Fringed
By RockThrower
No, Judge Anna Diggs Taylor did not vote for Ned Lamont.
Apparently she has done something even worse.
She had the audacity to defend the Constitution of the United States
of America, ruling that President Bush’s "terrorist surveillance
programs" were illegal and a direct violation of the first and fourth
amendment, not to mention the FISA legislation passed by Congress.
But rather than challenge her ruling on the law, in a tone similar to
that used by the President in describing "islamo-facists," the
Republican Party immediately labeled her a "liberal Democrat judge."
Trying to make political hay, the RNC website screamed the headline
"Liberal Judge Backs Dem Agenda To Weaken National Security."
Conservative bloggers were quick to call her an "Icon of the Lamont
Party" and we soon learned that Judge Taylor had been appointed by
that liberal "nut-ball" Jimmy Carter.
The administration’ mouthpiece Rush Limbaugh weighed in saying she was
"as dangerous as the enemy," accusing her and Carter of "traitorous"
behavior.
Immediately, the dirt began to fly with a report zooming across the
Internet that Taylor’s former husband, a congressman name Charles C.
Diggs had been indicted and convicted on charges of taking kickbacks
from his staff.
Worse, it seems that Taylor had been a supporter of the civil rights
movement and Martin Luther King.
No doubt about it, she was a member of the liberal fringe, and
probably a "commie" to boot.
All this ire is aimed at a 73-year-old woman who has been a respected
federal judge for nearly 20 years.
One of the first female African American graduates from Yale Law
school, (as many thoughtful conservative websites point out -- "a
two-fer") she has had a distinguished legal career serving as a county
prosecutor, assistant US attorney, and as an attorney in other
government agencies and private practice, eventually rising to become
Michigan’s first Black Female Federal Judge.
As to her involvement in the civil rights movement, she is apparently
guilty as charged.
It seems she participated in such nefarious activities as registering
voters in Mississippi.
But in ruling against what she called the administration’s assertion
that the president "has been granted the inherent power to violate not
only the laws of the Congress but the First and Fourth Amendments of
the Constitution itself " Judge Taylor, "Terrorist Sympathizer" that
she is, has apparently crossed the line.
She has joined the fringe.
As one conservative blogger wrote, her ruling is "a shocking reminder
of why Democrats must never be entrusted with power at any level."
Apparently, he has a different interpretation of the Constitution as
well.
But it gets worse.
The conservative blog-way spewed forth to call her an "Unpatriotic,"
"America Hating," "Crazy *****," "Jihad Judge," who should be
"immediately impeached."
She is "insane" and must be a "black" or "fucking a sand *****."
Judge Taylor deserves, as one blogger writes, "to have the first bomb
that comes here dropped on her head."
And from the outlying edges of the real fringe comes this, as reported
by the Huges for America Blog citing comments from Free Republic:
"This traitor should be taken out back and SHOT. Period. Not a joke,
not sarcasm. I'm tired of this terrorist-allied judicial legislators."
(Note: That’s not in the Constitution either.)
As for the President Bush, he says "Those who herald this decision
simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live."
He is right about that.
________________________________________________________
Another example of the poisonous vomit that these anti-American creeps
are capable of spewing.
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "mike" |
|
| Title: Re: Right Wing lunatics swiftboat Judge Anna Diggs Taylor |
21 Aug 2006 09:29:38 PM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ejpke2t3ko67sligsupjvc4i39ng2ak2k7@4ax.com...
http://houseoflabor.tpmcafe.com/blog/rockthrower/2006/aug/21/judge_taylor_gets_fringed
Aug 21, 2006
Judge Taylor Gets Fringed
By RockThrower
No, Judge Anna Diggs Taylor did not vote for Ned Lamont.
Apparently she has done something even worse.
She had the audacity to defend the Constitution of the United States
of America, ruling that President Bush's "terrorist surveillance
programs" were illegal and a direct violation of the first and fourth
amendment, not to mention the FISA legislation passed by Congress.
But rather than challenge her ruling on the law, in a tone similar to
that used by the President in describing "islamo-facists," the
Republican Party immediately labeled her a "liberal Democrat judge."
Trying to make political hay, the RNC website screamed the headline
"Liberal Judge Backs Dem Agenda To Weaken National Security."
Conservative bloggers were quick to call her an "Icon of the Lamont
Party" and we soon learned that Judge Taylor had been appointed by
that liberal "nut-ball" Jimmy Carter.
The administration' mouthpiece Rush Limbaugh weighed in saying she was
"as dangerous as the enemy," accusing her and Carter of "traitorous"
behavior.
Immediately, the dirt began to fly with a report zooming across the
Internet that Taylor's former husband, a congressman name Charles C.
Diggs had been indicted and convicted on charges of taking kickbacks
from his staff.
Worse, it seems that Taylor had been a supporter of the civil rights
movement and Martin Luther King.
No doubt about it, she was a member of the liberal fringe, and
probably a "commie" to boot.
All this ire is aimed at a 73-year-old woman who has been a respected
federal judge for nearly 20 years.
One of the first female African American graduates from Yale Law
school, (as many thoughtful conservative websites point out -- "a
two-fer") she has had a distinguished legal career serving as a county
prosecutor, assistant US attorney, and as an attorney in other
government agencies and private practice, eventually rising to become
Michigan's first Black Female Federal Judge.
As to her involvement in the civil rights movement, she is apparently
guilty as charged.
It seems she participated in such nefarious activities as registering
voters in Mississippi.
But in ruling against what she called the administration's assertion
that the president "has been granted the inherent power to violate not
only the laws of the Congress but the First and Fourth Amendments of
the Constitution itself " Judge Taylor, "Terrorist Sympathizer" that
she is, has apparently crossed the line.
She has joined the fringe.
As one conservative blogger wrote, her ruling is "a shocking reminder
of why Democrats must never be entrusted with power at any level."
Apparently, he has a different interpretation of the Constitution as
well.
But it gets worse.
The conservative blog-way spewed forth to call her an "Unpatriotic,"
"America Hating," "Crazy *****," "Jihad Judge," who should be
"immediately impeached."
She is "insane" and must be a "black" or "fucking a sand *****."
Judge Taylor deserves, as one blogger writes, "to have the first bomb
that comes here dropped on her head."
And from the outlying edges of the real fringe comes this, as reported
by the Huges for America Blog citing comments from Free Republic:
"This traitor should be taken out back and SHOT. Period. Not a joke,
not sarcasm. I'm tired of this terrorist-allied judicial legislators."
(Note: That's not in the Constitution either.)
As for the President Bush, he says "Those who herald this decision
simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live."
He is right about that.
________________________________________________________
Another example of the poisonous vomit that these anti-American creeps
are capable of spewing.
Harry
That report from CNN seems more left leaning than their usual unbiased tone,
strange.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Joseph Welch" |
|
| Title: Re: Right Wing lunatics swiftboat Judge Anna Diggs Taylor |
22 Aug 2006 01:06:46 AM |
|
|
"mike" <m2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i_tGg.468315$1Q1.51376@fe03.news.easynews.com...
That report from CNN seems more left leaning than their usual unbiased
tone,
How so?
Explain.
--
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by underminig American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
***************
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "me" |
|
| Title: Re: Right Wing lunatics swiftboat Judge Anna Diggs Taylor |
22 Aug 2006 07:52:20 AM |
|
|
Is it true that her husband was a bribe-taking criminal?
Did she spread her legs for a Congressman? Gross!!
Immediately, the dirt began to fly with a report zooming across the
Internet that Taylor's former husband, a congressman name Charles C.
Diggs had been indicted and convicted on charges of taking kickbacks
from his staff.
"mike" <m2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i_tGg.468315$1Q1.51376@fe03.news.easynews.com...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ejpke2t3ko67sligsupjvc4i39ng2ak2k7@4ax.com...
http://houseoflabor.tpmcafe.com/blog/rockthrower/2006/aug/21/judge_taylor_gets_fringed
Aug 21, 2006
Judge Taylor Gets Fringed
By RockThrower
No, Judge Anna Diggs Taylor did not vote for Ned Lamont.
Apparently she has done something even worse.
She had the audacity to defend the Constitution of the United States
of America, ruling that President Bush's "terrorist surveillance
programs" were illegal and a direct violation of the first and fourth
amendment, not to mention the FISA legislation passed by Congress.
But rather than challenge her ruling on the law, in a tone similar to
that used by the President in describing "islamo-facists," the
Republican Party immediately labeled her a "liberal Democrat judge."
Trying to make political hay, the RNC website screamed the headline
"Liberal Judge Backs Dem Agenda To Weaken National Security."
Conservative bloggers were quick to call her an "Icon of the Lamont
Party" and we soon learned that Judge Taylor had been appointed by
that liberal "nut-ball" Jimmy Carter.
The administration' mouthpiece Rush Limbaugh weighed in saying she was
"as dangerous as the enemy," accusing her and Carter of "traitorous"
behavior.
Immediately, the dirt began to fly with a report zooming across the
Internet that Taylor's former husband, a congressman name Charles C.
Diggs had been indicted and convicted on charges of taking kickbacks
from his staff.
Worse, it seems that Taylor had been a supporter of the civil rights
movement and Martin Luther King.
No doubt about it, she was a member of the liberal fringe, and
probably a "commie" to boot.
All this ire is aimed at a 73-year-old woman who has been a respected
federal judge for nearly 20 years.
One of the first female African American graduates from Yale Law
school, (as many thoughtful conservative websites point out -- "a
two-fer") she has had a distinguished legal career serving as a county
prosecutor, assistant US attorney, and as an attorney in other
government agencies and private practice, eventually rising to become
Michigan's first Black Female Federal Judge.
As to her involvement in the civil rights movement, she is apparently
guilty as charged.
It seems she participated in such nefarious activities as registering
voters in Mississippi.
But in ruling against what she called the administration's assertion
that the president "has been granted the inherent power to violate not
only the laws of the Congress but the First and Fourth Amendments of
the Constitution itself " Judge Taylor, "Terrorist Sympathizer" that
she is, has apparently crossed the line.
She has joined the fringe.
As one conservative blogger wrote, her ruling is "a shocking reminder
of why Democrats must never be entrusted with power at any level."
Apparently, he has a different interpretation of the Constitution as
well.
But it gets worse.
The conservative blog-way spewed forth to call her an "Unpatriotic,"
"America Hating," "Crazy *****," "Jihad Judge," who should be
"immediately impeached."
She is "insane" and must be a "black" or "fucking a sand *****."
Judge Taylor deserves, as one blogger writes, "to have the first bomb
that comes here dropped on her head."
And from the outlying edges of the real fringe comes this, as reported
by the Huges for America Blog citing comments from Free Republic:
"This traitor should be taken out back and SHOT. Period. Not a joke,
not sarcasm. I'm tired of this terrorist-allied judicial legislators."
(Note: That's not in the Constitution either.)
As for the President Bush, he says "Those who herald this decision
simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live."
He is right about that.
________________________________________________________
Another example of the poisonous vomit that these anti-American creeps
are capable of spewing.
Harry
That report from CNN seems more left leaning than their usual unbiased
tone, strange.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: Right Wing lunatics swiftboat Judge Anna Diggs Taylor |
23 Aug 2006 08:13:33 AM |
|
|
"me" <spam@spam.net> wrote in message news:d6DGg.1$g_4.0@newsfe08.lga...
Is it true that her husband was a bribe-taking criminal?
Did she spread her legs for a Congressman? Gross!!
If the judge commited a crime, indict her, send her to trial and then put
her in jail.
However, in the real world, the above is just typical right speak. Stupid,
off topic and posted by an *****.
Immediately, the dirt began to fly with a report zooming across the
Internet that Taylor's former husband, a congressman name Charles C.
Diggs had been indicted and convicted on charges of taking kickbacks
from his staff.
"mike" <m2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:i_tGg.468315$1Q1.51376@fe03.news.easynews.com...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ejpke2t3ko67sligsupjvc4i39ng2ak2k7@4ax.com...
http://houseoflabor.tpmcafe.com/blog/rockthrower/2006/aug/21/judge_taylor_gets_fringed
Aug 21, 2006
Judge Taylor Gets Fringed
By RockThrower
No, Judge Anna Diggs Taylor did not vote for Ned Lamont.
Apparently she has done something even worse.
She had the audacity to defend the Constitution of the United States
of America, ruling that President Bush's "terrorist surveillance
programs" were illegal and a direct violation of the first and fourth
amendment, not to mention the FISA legislation passed by Congress.
But rather than challenge her ruling on the law, in a tone similar to
that used by the President in describing "islamo-facists," the
Republican Party immediately labeled her a "liberal Democrat judge."
Trying to make political hay, the RNC website screamed the headline
"Liberal Judge Backs Dem Agenda To Weaken National Security."
Conservative bloggers were quick to call her an "Icon of the Lamont
Party" and we soon learned that Judge Taylor had been appointed by
that liberal "nut-ball" Jimmy Carter.
The administration' mouthpiece Rush Limbaugh weighed in saying she was
"as dangerous as the enemy," accusing her and Carter of "traitorous"
behavior.
Immediately, the dirt began to fly with a report zooming across the
Internet that Taylor's former husband, a congressman name Charles C.
Diggs had been indicted and convicted on charges of taking kickbacks
from his staff.
Worse, it seems that Taylor had been a supporter of the civil rights
movement and Martin Luther King.
No doubt about it, she was a member of the liberal fringe, and
probably a "commie" to boot.
All this ire is aimed at a 73-year-old woman who has been a respected
federal judge for nearly 20 years.
One of the first female African American graduates from Yale Law
school, (as many thoughtful conservative websites point out -- "a
two-fer") she has had a distinguished legal career serving as a county
prosecutor, assistant US attorney, and as an attorney in other
government agencies and private practice, eventually rising to become
Michigan's first Black Female Federal Judge.
As to her involvement in the civil rights movement, she is apparently
guilty as charged.
It seems she participated in such nefarious activities as registering
voters in Mississippi.
But in ruling against what she called the administration's assertion
that the president "has been granted the inherent power to violate not
only the laws of the Congress but the First and Fourth Amendments of
the Constitution itself " Judge Taylor, "Terrorist Sympathizer" that
she is, has apparently crossed the line.
She has joined the fringe.
As one conservative blogger wrote, her ruling is "a shocking reminder
of why Democrats must never be entrusted with power at any level."
Apparently, he has a different interpretation of the Constitution as
well.
But it gets worse.
The conservative blog-way spewed forth to call her an "Unpatriotic,"
"America Hating," "Crazy *****," "Jihad Judge," who should be
"immediately impeached."
She is "insane" and must be a "black" or "fucking a sand *****."
Judge Taylor deserves, as one blogger writes, "to have the first bomb
that comes here dropped on her head."
And from the outlying edges of the real fringe comes this, as reported
by the Huges for America Blog citing comments from Free Republic:
"This traitor should be taken out back and SHOT. Period. Not a joke,
not sarcasm. I'm tired of this terrorist-allied judicial legislators."
(Note: That's not in the Constitution either.)
As for the President Bush, he says "Those who herald this decision
simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live."
He is right about that.
________________________________________________________
Another example of the poisonous vomit that these anti-American creeps
are capable of spewing.
Harry
That report from CNN seems more left leaning than their usual unbiased
tone, strange.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: Right Wing lunatics swiftboat Judge Anna Diggs Taylor |
23 Aug 2006 08:31:58 AM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:ejpke2t3ko67sligsupjvc4i39ng2ak2k7@4ax.com...
http://houseoflabor.tpmcafe.com/blog/rockthrower/2006/aug/21/judge_taylor_gets_fringed
Aug 21, 2006
Judge Taylor Gets Fringed
By RockThrower
No, Judge Anna Diggs Taylor did not vote for Ned Lamont.
Apparently she has done something even worse.
She had the audacity to defend the Constitution of the United States
of America, ruling that President Bush's "terrorist surveillance
programs" were illegal and a direct violation of the first and fourth
amendment, not to mention the FISA legislation passed by Congress.
But rather than challenge her ruling on the law, in a tone similar to
that used by the President in describing "islamo-facists," the
Republican Party immediately labeled her a "liberal Democrat judge."
That's all they have is attack and smear.
Trying to make political hay, the RNC website screamed the headline
"Liberal Judge Backs Dem Agenda To Weaken National Security."
Oh? I guess even the conservative republicans are acknowledging that the
Contitution of the United States of America is "Liberal".
Conservative bloggers were quick to call her an "Icon of the Lamont
Party" and we soon learned that Judge Taylor had been appointed by
that liberal "nut-ball" Jimmy Carter.
Hell - why stop there?
Why not ***** moan blame and smear every "democrat" that came after Ike?
The administration' mouthpiece Rush Limbaugh weighed in saying she was
"as dangerous as the enemy," accusing her and Carter of "traitorous"
behavior.
Oh? Is that ***** still alive? I thought they declared him "brain-dead"
years ago.
Immediately, the dirt began to fly with a report zooming across the
Internet that Taylor's former husband, a congressman name Charles C.
Diggs had been indicted and convicted on charges of taking kickbacks
from his staff.
Worse, it seems that Taylor had been a supporter of the civil rights
movement and Martin Luther King.
No doubt about it, she was a member of the liberal fringe, and
probably a "commie" to boot.
All this ire is aimed at a 73-year-old woman who has been a respected
federal judge for nearly 20 years.
One of the first female African American graduates from Yale Law
school, (as many thoughtful conservative websites point out -- "a
two-fer") she has had a distinguished legal career serving as a county
prosecutor, assistant US attorney, and as an attorney in other
government agencies and private practice, eventually rising to become
Michigan's first Black Female Federal Judge.
WHOA!!!!!
Where are those fucking "reichtards" who bellow about RACISM any time a
inept or undeserving, ultra-fanatical, conservative black republican is
suggested by Bush, and stopped by liberals?
As to her involvement in the civil rights movement, she is apparently
guilty as charged.
It seems she participated in such nefarious activities as registering
voters in Mississippi.
But in ruling against what she called the administration's assertion
that the president "has been granted the inherent power to violate not
only the laws of the Congress but the First and Fourth Amendments of
the Constitution itself " Judge Taylor, "Terrorist Sympathizer" that
she is, has apparently crossed the line.
She has joined the fringe.
Considering the Nazi-esque actions of the Bush administration, following the
Constitution IS "fringe".
As one conservative blogger wrote, her ruling is "a shocking reminder
of why Democrats must never be entrusted with power at any level."
Apparently, he has a different interpretation of the Constitution as
well.
But it gets worse.
The conservative blog-way spewed forth to call her an "Unpatriotic,"
"America Hating," "Crazy *****," "Jihad Judge," who should be
"immediately impeached."
She is "insane" and must be a "black" or "fucking a sand *****."
Judge Taylor deserves, as one blogger writes, "to have the first bomb
that comes here dropped on her head."
And from the outlying edges of the real fringe comes this, as reported
by the Huges for America Blog citing comments from Free Republic:
"This traitor should be taken out back and SHOT. Period. Not a joke,
not sarcasm. I'm tired of this terrorist-allied judicial legislators."
(Note: That's not in the Constitution either.)
As for the President Bush, he says "Those who herald this decision
simply do not understand the nature of the world in which we live."
Bwahahaaaaa..... the S.O.B. egomaniac has a lower rating than ever- and he
says OTHERS don't understand?
He is right about that.
________________________________________________________
Another example of the poisonous vomit that these anti-American creeps
are capable of spewing.
Harry
That report from CNN seems more left leaning than their usual unbiased
tone, strange.
Again, telling the truth is "left leaning"!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
