| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Bill Rood" |
| Date: |
05 Jun 2007 11:47:30 PM |
| Object: |
Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
I'm surprised Ron Paul got so much attention from Wolf Blitzer and the
audience. Kucinich and Gravel didn't get anywhere near this kind of
play. I don't agree with Paul on everything. I think libertarians fail
to understand that corporations are creations of the State. But he's
the real deal on militarism, empire and aggressive war. He's right when
he says that's the most important moral issue facing this nation. He's
also big on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and consistency on the
rule of law. The left wing peace movement needs to reach out to
conservatives like Ron Paul. If the Republicans were to nominate Paul
to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote for Ron Paul.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/06/05/ron-paul-at-the-june-5-republican-debate/
.
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
06 Jun 2007 07:52:26 AM |
|
|
"Bill Rood" <wjrood@magnaspeed.net> wrote in message
news:46663C62.3040703@magnaspeed.net...
I'm surprised Ron Paul got so much attention from Wolf Blitzer and the
audience. Kucinich and Gravel didn't get anywhere near this kind of play.
If you consider CNNs subtle agenda, I think
the reason would be clear.
I don't agree with Paul on everything. I think libertarians fail to
understand that corporations are creations of the State. But he's the
real deal on militarism, empire and aggressive war. He's right when he
says that's the most important moral issue facing this nation. He's also
big on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and consistency on the rule of
law. The left wing peace movement needs to reach out to conservatives
like Ron Paul. If the Republicans were to nominate Paul to run against
Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote for Ron Paul.
Ron Paul certainly makes some good points.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/06/05/ron-paul-at-the-june-5-republican-debate/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter B. P." |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
09 Jun 2007 08:12:42 AM |
|
|
Bill Rood <wjrood@magnaspeed.net> wrote:
I'm surprised Ron Paul got so much attention from Wolf Blitzer and the
audience. Kucinich and Gravel didn't get anywhere near this kind of play.
I don't agree with Paul on everything. I think libertarians fail to
understand that corporations are creations of the State.
Libertarians in my circles have no problems understanding that.
But he's the real deal on militarism, empire and aggressive war. He's
right when he says that's the most important moral issue facing this
nation. He's also big on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and
consistency on the rule of law. The left wing peace movement needs to
reach out to conservatives like Ron Paul. If the Republicans were to
nominate Paul to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote
for Ron Paul.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/06/05/ron-paul-at-the-june-5-republican-d
ebate/
Agreed.
-- regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
"We don't dial 911 - we dial .357".
.
|
|
|
| User: "udarrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
09 Jun 2007 05:03:48 PM |
|
|
Peter B. P. wrote:
Bill Rood <wjrood@magnaspeed.net> wrote:
I'm surprised Ron Paul got so much attention from Wolf Blitzer and the
audience. Kucinich and Gravel didn't get anywhere near this kind of play.
I don't agree with Paul on everything. I think libertarians fail to
understand that corporations are creations of the State.
Libertarians in my circles have no problems understanding that.
But he's the real deal on militarism, empire and aggressive war. He's
right when he says that's the most important moral issue facing this
nation. He's also big on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and
consistency on the rule of law. The left wing peace movement needs to
reach out to conservatives like Ron Paul. If the Republicans were to
nominate Paul to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote
for Ron Paul.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/06/05/ron-paul-at-the-june-5-republican-d
ebate/
Agreed.
-- regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
"We don't dial 911 - we dial .357".
The Republican Party will never allow Ron Paul to win the nomination!
Ron Paul has the rest of the Repub candidates beat 40 ways to Sunday.
Dr. Ron Paul is the only genuine Republican Conservative and ought to be
the pick of the party.
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks chasing
votes.
I support Rep Ron Paul on my website.
http://blog.ronpaul2008.com/ His Blog
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/ * HOPE FOR AMERICA *
I am an Independent Progressive. - udarrell
--
WISDOM PRINCIPLE DIRECTED EMPOWERMENT COMMUNICATIONS -
THE REAL POLITICAL ISSUES and WISDOM BASED PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT
http://www.udarrell.com/
http://www.udarrell.com/my_pages2.htm
http://www.udarrell.com/recognizing_real_enemies.html ***
http://jesuschristsavior.net/Beatitudes.html
http://www.antiwar.com/ ***
Reality Is Not An Easy Thing To Be Confronted With, or to Accept!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Gibbons" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
11 Jun 2007 12:44:20 AM |
|
|
In article <8tFai.35408$G23.26171@newsreading01.news.tds.net>,
udarrell <anonymousl@anonymous.com> wrote:
The Republican Party will never allow Ron Paul to win the nomination!
Ron Paul has the rest of the Repub candidates beat 40 ways to Sunday.
Dr. Ron Paul is the only genuine Republican Conservative and ought to be
the pick of the party.
He's the only real conservative, but that doesn't matter, because the
Republican party is only about militarism, fearmongering and gay bashing
now.
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks chasing
votes.
Of course. And most of them will lie, cheat and steal to get power,
which suggests they'll most likely misuse it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Governor Swill" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
11 Jun 2007 11:13:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:44:20 -0600, Hugh Gibbons
<hugh_gibbons@dontsendmeemail.net> wrote:
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks chasing
votes.
Of course. And most of them will lie, cheat and steal to get power,
which suggests they'll most likely misuse it.
Wait, are we still talking about Democrats?
Swill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Gibbons" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
12 Jun 2007 12:14:57 AM |
|
|
In article <nb7s631fgp54s82q57tchl199sbs5s17mu@4ax.com>,
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:44:20 -0600, Hugh Gibbons
<hugh_gibbons@dontsendmeemail.net> wrote:
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks chasing
votes.
Of course. And most of them will lie, cheat and steal to get power,
which suggests they'll most likely misuse it.
Wait, are we still talking about Democrats?
Ron Paul wasn't at their debate, was he?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Governor Swill" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
12 Jun 2007 08:38:56 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:14:57 -0600, Hugh Gibbons
<hugh_gibbons@dontsendmeemail.net> wrote:
In article <nb7s631fgp54s82q57tchl199sbs5s17mu@4ax.com>,
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:44:20 -0600, Hugh Gibbons
<hugh_gibbons@dontsendmeemail.net> wrote:
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks chasing
votes.
Of course. And most of them will lie, cheat and steal to get power,
which suggests they'll most likely misuse it.
Wait, are we still talking about Democrats?
Ron Paul wasn't at their debate, was he?
My intent was to sarcastically point out that those criticizing
Republicans might as well be speaking about Democrats as there's
little difference between the two.
Noticed the other day that Jefferson finally got indicted. I'll be
happy to see him in that orange jumpsuit sharing a cell with Bubba.
Swill
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Gibbons" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
12 Jun 2007 11:13:00 PM |
|
|
In article <9hiu635hjiek7dtoocuv5ujjq2lo4aavae@4ax.com>,
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:14:57 -0600, Hugh Gibbons
<hugh_gibbons@dontsendmeemail.net> wrote:
In article <nb7s631fgp54s82q57tchl199sbs5s17mu@4ax.com>,
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:44:20 -0600, Hugh Gibbons
<hugh_gibbons@dontsendmeemail.net> wrote:
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks
chasing
votes.
Of course. And most of them will lie, cheat and steal to get power,
which suggests they'll most likely misuse it.
Wait, are we still talking about Democrats?
Ron Paul wasn't at their debate, was he?
My intent was to sarcastically point out that those criticizing
Republicans might as well be speaking about Democrats as there's
little difference between the two.
I think there are differences between them, but not in their level
of ambition.
Noticed the other day that Jefferson finally got indicted. I'll be
happy to see him in that orange jumpsuit sharing a cell with Bubba.
Me too.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Governor Swill" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
13 Jun 2007 04:51:15 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:13:00 -0600, Hugh Gibbons
<hugh_gibbons@dontsendmeemail.net> wrote:
My intent was to sarcastically point out that those criticizing
Republicans might as well be speaking about Democrats as there's
little difference between the two.
I think there are differences between them, but not in their level
of ambition.
Or their methods of achieving it.
Swill
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peter B. P." |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
09 Jun 2007 05:13:43 PM |
|
|
udarrell <anonymousl@anonymous.com> wrote:
Peter B. P. wrote:
Bill Rood <wjrood@magnaspeed.net> wrote:
I'm surprised Ron Paul got so much attention from Wolf Blitzer and the
audience. Kucinich and Gravel didn't get anywhere near this kind of play.
I don't agree with Paul on everything. I think libertarians fail to
understand that corporations are creations of the State.
Libertarians in my circles have no problems understanding that.
But he's the real deal on militarism, empire and aggressive war. He's
right when he says that's the most important moral issue facing this
nation. He's also big on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and
consistency on the rule of law. The left wing peace movement needs to
reach out to conservatives like Ron Paul. If the Republicans were to
nominate Paul to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote
for Ron Paul.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/06/05/ron-paul-at-the-june-5-republican-d
ebate/
Agreed.
-- regards , Peter B. P. http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
"We don't dial 911 - we dial .357".
The Republican Party will never allow Ron Paul to win the nomination!
Ron Paul has the rest of the Repub candidates beat 40 ways to Sunday.
Dr. Ron Paul is the only genuine Republican Conservative and ought to be
the pick of the party.
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks chasing
votes.
I support Rep Ron Paul on my website.
http://blog.ronpaul2008.com/ His Blog
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/ * HOPE FOR AMERICA *
I am an Independent Progressive. - udarrell
I agree, but I'd like to correct an error you made - there isn't much
conservatism left in the Republican party anymore.
--
regards , Peter B. P.
http://titancity.com/blog , http://macplanet.dk
"We don't dial 911 - we dial .357".
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Graeme" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
09 Jun 2007 09:46:23 PM |
|
|
On Jun 9, 6:13 pm, (Peter B. P.) wrote:
udarrell <anonymo...@anonymous.com> wrote:
Peter B. P. wrote:
Bill Rood <wjr...@magnaspeed.net> wrote:
I'm surprised Ron Paul got so much attention from Wolf Blitzer and the
audience. Kucinich and Gravel didn't get anywhere near this kind of play.
I don't agree with Paul on everything. I think libertarians fail to
understand that corporations are creations of the State.
Libertarians in my circles have no problems understanding that.
But he's the real deal on militarism, empire and aggressive war. He's
right when he says that's the most important moral issue facing this
nation. He's also big on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and
consistency on the rule of law. The left wing peace movement needs to
reach out to conservatives like Ron Paul. If the Republicans were to
nominate Paul to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote
for Ron Paul.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/06/05/ron-paul-at-the-june-5-republi...
ebate/
Agreed.
-- regards , Peter B. P.http://titancity.com/blog,http://macplanet.dk
"We don't dial 911 - we dial .357".
The Republican Party will never allow Ron Paul to win the nomination!
Ron Paul has the rest of the Repub candidates beat 40 ways to Sunday.
Dr. Ron Paul is the only genuine Republican Conservative and ought to be
the pick of the party.
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks chasing
votes.
I support Rep Ron Paul on my website.
http://blog.ronpaul2008.com/ His Blog
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/ * HOPE FOR AMERICA *
I am an Independent Progressive. - udarrell
I agree, but I'd like to correct an error you made - there isn't much
conservatism left in the Republican party anymore.
True. That's not necessarily a bad thing in itself, but there's not
much sense of any kind left in the Republican party anymore. Then
again, the same could be said of the Democrats.
--
regards , Peter B. P.http://titancity.com/blog,http://macplanet.dk
"We don't dial 911 - we dial .357".
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "A Veteran" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
06 Jun 2007 11:15:34 AM |
|
|
In article <46663C62.3040703@magnaspeed.net>,
Bill Rood <wjrood@magnaspeed.net> wrote:
I'm surprised Ron Paul got so much attention from Wolf Blitzer and the
audience. Kucinich and Gravel didn't get anywhere near this kind of
play. I don't agree with Paul on everything. I think libertarians fail
to understand that corporations are creations of the State. But he's
the real deal on militarism, empire and aggressive war. He's right when
he says that's the most important moral issue facing this nation. He's
also big on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and consistency on the
rule of law. The left wing peace movement needs to reach out to
conservatives like Ron Paul. If the Republicans were to nominate Paul
to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote for Ron Paul.
http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2007/06/05/ron-paul-at-the-june-5-republican-debat
e/
Ron is sure ruffling a few feathers.
A breath of fresh air and the RNC was hi-jacked by the Neo-Cons.
Now , turning up just plain "Cons" like "scooter"
Scoot, scoot and don't bend over to pick up the soap.
--
when you believe the only tool you have is a hammer.
All problems look like nails.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
06 Jun 2007 11:46:17 AM |
|
|
In message news:46663C62.3040703@magnaspeed.net, Bill Rood sprach forth the
following:
If the Republicans were to nominate Paul
to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote for Ron Paul.
Paul would definitely scoop antiwar votes away from John Rodham Obama.
Conceivably a Lamont/Lieberman situation, except that no rank-and-file
Republican would vote for John Rodham Obama - only the uber-Rockefellers
and the Israel-first faction.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Peitsche" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
08 Jun 2007 09:47:09 PM |
|
|
Ron Paul is the only constituonalist running for the presidence ,the rest of
them are just puppets of Israel.
"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" <nospam@whitehouse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns994781D8C61E3FredGarvin@66.250.146.128...
In message news:46663C62.3040703@magnaspeed.net, Bill Rood sprach forth
the
following:
If the Republicans were to nominate Paul
to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote for Ron Paul.
Paul would definitely scoop antiwar votes away from John Rodham Obama.
Conceivably a Lamont/Lieberman situation, except that no rank-and-file
Republican would vote for John Rodham Obama - only the uber-Rockefellers
and the Israel-first faction.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Spaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
09 Jun 2007 01:36:04 PM |
|
|
"Peitsche" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:ON-dndDRZ4znjvfbnZ2dnUVZ_uejnZ2d@comcast.com...
Ron Paul is the only constituonalist running for the presidence ,the rest
of them are just puppets of Israel.
Ron Paul is a joke who will get LAUGHED out of the election.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugh Gibbons" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
11 Jun 2007 12:40:54 AM |
|
|
In article <HcidnTq7Iru1bvfbnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"Spaz" <yea@right.com> wrote:
"Peitsche" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:ON-dndDRZ4znjvfbnZ2dnUVZ_uejnZ2d@comcast.com...
Ron Paul is the only constituonalist running for the presidence ,the rest
of them are just puppets of Israel.
Ron Paul is a joke who will get LAUGHED out of the election.
He's also the only Republican candidate who disavows the policy
of preemptive war.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Peitsche" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
10 Jun 2007 09:13:32 PM |
|
|
We know you jew-supremacists control the Media but the Web is still beyond
you control,that`s where the movement for Ron Paul is.
"Spaz" <yea@right.com> wrote in message
news:HcidnTq7Iru1bvfbnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@comcast.com...
"Peitsche" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:ON-dndDRZ4znjvfbnZ2dnUVZ_uejnZ2d@comcast.com...
Ron Paul is the only constituonalist running for the presidence ,the rest
of them are just puppets of Israel.
Ron Paul is a joke who will get LAUGHED out of the election.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "udarrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Ron Paul at CNN debate in New Hampshire |
09 Jun 2007 07:20:34 AM |
|
|
Peitsche wrote:
Ron Paul is the only constituonalist running for the presidency ,the rest of
them are just puppets of Israel.
"Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute" <nospam@whitehouse.gov> wrote in message
news:Xns994781D8C61E3FredGarvin@66.250.146.128...
In message news:46663C62.3040703@magnaspeed.net, Bill Rood sprach forth
the
following:
If the Republicans were to nominate Paul
to run against Clinton, Obama or Edwards, I'd have to vote for Ron Paul.
Paul would definitely scoop antiwar votes away from John Rodham Obama.
Conceivably a Lamont/Lieberman situation, except that no rank-and-file
Republican would vote for John Rodham Obama - only the uber-Rockefellers
and the Israel-first faction.
Dr. Ron Paul is he only genuine Republican Conservative and ought to be
the pick of the party.
The rest of the Republican candidates are merely political hacks chasing
votes.
I support Rep Ron Paul on my website.
http://blog.ronpaul2008.com/ His Blog
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/ * HOPE FOR AMERICA * - udarrell
--
WISDOM PRINCIPLE DIRECTED EMPOWERMENT COMMUNICATIONS -
THE REAL POLITICAL ISSUES and WISDOM BASED PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT
http://www.udarrell.com/
http://www.udarrell.com/my_pages2.htm
http://www.udarrell.com/recognizing_real_enemies.html ***
http://jesuschristsavior.net/Beatitudes.html
http://www.antiwar.com/ ***
Reality Is Not An Easy Thing To Be Confronted With, or to Accept!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
