http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13702.html

November 24th, 2007

Paul says he won't support GOP nominee


Last month, during a Republican debate, Ron Paul was asked whether he
promised to support the GOP nominee next year, no matter who emerges
from the primary process.

"Not right now I don't," Paul said, "not unless they're willing to end
the war and bring our troops home."
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13189.html

Apparently, in the ensuing weeks, "not right now" has become "no."
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=axM7t8OfWxFg&refer=politics

Paul called his Republican presidential rivals, including frontrunner
Rudy Giuliani, "neo-conservatives" whom he couldn't support in the
general election should his own bid fail.

"They think we're supposed to spread our goodness through force," Paul
said.

For example, none will pledge not to wage war on Iran, he said.

"How could I support something like that?"


Apparently, he can't.

But it means that of the top seven candidates in the Republican field,
Paul is the only one who isn't prepared to support the party's
eventual nominee.

It's not the kind of thing that will go over well within the party,
but then again, Paul's interest in the Republican Party appears
nominal - it's a venue for him to advance his ideas and agenda, not
necessarily an opportunity for him to lead the party.

It's interesting to note the contrast between Paul's comments and John
Edwards'.

A couple of weeks ago, Edwards hedged when asked if he would support
the eventual Democratic nominee, no matter who it is.
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13577.html

When he initially hesitated, it caused a minor stir in Democratic
circles - how can Edwards expect to be the party's nominee if he's not
willing to commit to honoring the party's nominating process?

No one seems to be saying that about Paul, in large part because no
one seems to consider Paul part of the Republican mainstream.

For that matter, it also once again raises the specter of an
independent Paul bid.

During an MSNBC interview earlier this month, Norah O'Donnell followed
up on this point:


O'DONNELL:

Congressman, as you know, most of the other Republicans running for
president that you have stood onstage with during the debates, they
support a continuation of the war in Iraq. You want to end the war in
Iraq. If one of them is awarded the Republican nomination, will you
choose a third party? Will you not back that nominee?

PAUL:

No, I don't plan to run in a third party. That's not my goal. But if
we have a candidate that loves the war and loves the neo-con position
of promoting our-


At that point in the interview, O'Donnell interrupted, and the
interview didn't return to the subject.

But the "I don't plan to run" language, coupled by this week's remarks
about not supporting the eventual GOP nominee, should continue to
raise eyebrows when it comes to Paul's intentions.

____________________________________________________

Harry

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/13702.html

November 24th, 2007

snip

No one seems to be saying that about Paul, in large part because no
one seems to consider Paul part of the Republican mainstream.

For that matter, it also once again raises the specter of an
independent Paul bid.