Last night, ABC News broadcasted secret video tape of Saddam in a
cabinet meeting before the invasion in 2001. Saddam, in his own words,
stated that there would be terrorist attacks in the U.S. but he clearly
stated to his cabinet members that Iraq would not involve in these
attacks.

Putting thousands or millions to death just because a leader thought
that these people were dangerous without concrete edvidence were
serious crimes against humanity. Hitler, Satlin, Mao, Kim Sung had done
that.

The U.S. once believed that Ho was a threat to America and thus helped
the French to colonize Vietnam and escalated the war in Vietnam. Three
million Vietnamese died along with 58,000 U.S. soldiers among millions
suffered affects of AO and PTSD.

Thirty years have passed since the withdrawal of U.S. and it is now
clear that Vietnam was and is no threat to America. While communist is
a bad form of governmentto the people, American's perception that
communist Vietnamese were dangerous to America is similar to the
Germans once viewed Jews were dangerous to Germany.
Now Americans again viewed Islamic Iraqis were dangerous to America and
thousands or millions people would be killed by this never-ending war.
Again this is similar to Nazis Germany once viewed Jews were dangerous
to German's national security.

Have we ever learned that we made a mistake in Vietnam by viewing
Communist Vietnam a danger to America? The lie "if we don''t fight them
in Vietnam, we will have to fight them in America" now is modified into
"If we don't fight them in Iraq, we will have to fight against them in
America."

Last night, ABC News broadcasted secret video tape of Saddam in a
cabinet meeting before the invasion in 2001. Saddam, in his own words,
stated that there would be terrorist attacks in the U.S. but he clearly
stated to his cabinet members that Iraq would not involve in these
attacks.

Putting thousands or millions to death just because a leader thought
that these people were dangerous without concrete edvidence were
serious crimes against humanity. Hitler, Satlin, Mao, Kim Sung had done
that.

The U.S. once believed that Ho was a threat to America and thus helped
the French to colonize Vietnam and escalated the war in Vietnam. Three
million Vietnamese died along with 58,000 U.S. soldiers among millions
suffered affects of AO and PTSD.

Thirty years have passed since the withdrawal of U.S. and it is now
clear that Vietnam was and is no threat to America. While communist is
a bad form of governmentto the people, American's perception that
communist Vietnamese were dangerous to America is similar to the
Germans once viewed Jews were dangerous to Germany.
Now Americans again viewed Islamic Iraqis were dangerous to America and
thousands or millions people would be killed by this never-ending war.
Again this is similar to Nazis Germany once viewed Jews were dangerous
to German's national security.

Have we ever learned that we made a mistake in Vietnam by viewing
Communist Vietnam a danger to America? The lie "if we don''t fight them
in Vietnam, we will have to fight them in America" now is modified into
"If we don't fight them in Iraq, we will have to fight against them in
America."

Last night, ABC News broadcasted secret video tape of Saddam in a
cabinet meeting before the invasion in 2001. Saddam, in his own words,
stated that there would be terrorist attacks in the U.S. but he clearly
stated to his cabinet members that Iraq would not involve in these
attacks.

Putting thousands or millions to death just because a leader thought
that these people were dangerous without concrete edvidence were
serious crimes against humanity. Hitler, Satlin, Mao, Kim Sung had done
that.

The U.S. once believed that Ho was a threat to America and thus helped
the French to colonize Vietnam and escalated the war in Vietnam. Three
million Vietnamese died along with 58,000 U.S. soldiers among millions
suffered affects of AO and PTSD.

Thirty years have passed since the withdrawal of U.S. and it is now
clear that Vietnam was and is no threat to America. While communist is
a bad form of governmentto the people, American's perception that
communist Vietnamese were dangerous to America is similar to the
Germans once viewed Jews were dangerous to Germany.
Now Americans again viewed Islamic Iraqis were dangerous to America and
thousands or millions people would be killed by this never-ending war.
Again this is similar to Nazis Germany once viewed Jews were dangerous
to German's national security.

Have we ever learned that we made a mistake in Vietnam by viewing
Communist Vietnam a danger to America? The lie "if we don''t fight them
in Vietnam, we will have to fight them in America" now is modified into
"If we don't fight them in Iraq, we will have to fight against them in
America."

Were those people conspiring with Saddam Hussein CANADIAN Muslim
terrorists?

I can just see them now with their beedy little eyes trying to smuggle
Korans and other WMDs into the United States in crates disguised as maple
syrup.

(Mrs.) Sheila Broflovski
Broflovski Accounting

DGVREIMAN wrote:

I told you so. All the "Bush Bashers" and "Hate America"
types need to belly up to the boiled Crow buffet on this one.
Somehow, however, they will still find a way to blame
President Bush for allowing Saddam to move his WMD into Syria
and Lebanon before the liberation invasion. There will be no
mention of "we were wrong about no WMD in Iraq" it will all
come out as "its all Bush's fault. Somehow, they will blame
him for not revealing what he knew earlier - right before all
the Dimmys made complete and utter fools out of themselves for
claiming Saddam "never had WMD."

I have been telling everyone for years (1) there were WMD in
Iraq, and (2) Saddam was involved with radical Muslim
terrorism - now his own tapes and documents will prove those
two facts completely.

So how do you hate America types like your Crow? Boiled,
baked, or raw like Michael Moore?

If the Dimmy's don't back down on this one then I just hope
they get invited to a Quail hunt by VP Cheney.
Doug Grant (Tm)

You're stoned out of your mind and completely unworthy of a
response.

Tim

"Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:B42dnRNozbrK-m7eRVn-uA@comcast.com...

Secret audiotapes of Saddam Hussein discussing ways to attack
America
with weapons of mass destruction will be the subject of an ABC
"Nightline" program Wednesday night, a former federal
prosecutor told
Cybercast News Service.

The tapes are being called the "smoking gun" of weapons of
mass
destruction (WMD) in Iraq. The New York Sun reported that the
tapes have
been authenticated and currently are being reviewed by the
U.S. House
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

The panel's chairman, Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.), declined
to give the
Sun details of the content or context of the recordings,
saying only that
they were provided to his committee by former federal
prosecutor John
Loftus.

Loftus has been tight-lipped about the tapes, telling the Sun
only that
he received them from a "former American military intelligence
analyst."
However, on Wednesday he told Cybercast News Service,
"Saddam's tapes
confirm he had active CW [chemical weapons] and BW [biological
weapons]
programs that were hidden from the UN."

On Tuesday night, Loftus told Cybercast News Service that
ABC's
"Nightline" would air an "extensive report" on the tapes
Wednesday night.
Loftus also described an ABC News "teaser," which reportedly
contains
audio of Saddam Hussein discussing ways to attack America with
WMD.
"Nightline will have a lot more," said Loftus.

The tapes are scheduled to be revealed to the public Saturday
morning at
the opening session of The Intelligence Summit, a conference
which brings
together intelligence professionals from around the world.

Loftus is president of The Intelligence Summit. Its advisory
council
includes generals, a former F.B.I. official, a former senior
Israeli
Mossad officer and the former chair of the British Joint
Intelligence
Committee, according to information posted on the summit
website.
Currently a private attorney, Loftus says he works pro bono to
help
intelligence agents obtain lawful permission to declassify and
publish
the "hidden secrets of our times."

He purportedly has held some of the highest security
clearances in the
world with special access to NATO Cosmic, CIA codeword and Top
Secret
nuclear files.

This year's Intelligence Summit will bring together top
terrorism experts
including Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, author of "Funding Evil," 9/11
investigator Jean-Charles Brisard, author of "Zarqawi: the New
Face of
Al-Qaeda;" former CIA agent Michael Scheurer, author of
"Imperial
Hubris," and Richard Marcinko, former head of SEAL Team Six,
and author
of "Rogue Warrior."

The Intelligence Summit will be featured not only in the
Wednesday
Nightline report but also on ABC World News Tonight.

In a March 2005 addendum to the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) report
on Iraq's
alleged weapons of mass destruction, ISG head Charles Duelfer
wrote that
while there continue to be reports of WMD in Iraq, the ISG
found "such
reports are usually scams or misidentification of materials or
activities."

A limited number of cases involved the discovery of old
chemical
munitions produced before 1990, Duelfer wrote. He also
reported in the
addendum that a large collection of audiotapes from Iraq's
Revolutionary
Command Council meetings chaired by Saddam was in the process
of
translation. While he conceded there were "remaining
uncertainties," the
chief weapons hunter said it was "not likely" the
documentation would
provide "significant surprises" regarding WMD.

Loftus told Cybercast News Service that the documentation
referenced by
Duelfer ended in 1991, and was not related to the new
audiotapes.

"[T]here were no weapons," Sen. Hillary Clinton, (D-N.Y.)
recently
commented, "or if there were, they certainly weren't used or
they were in
some way disposed of or taken out of the country." Her
comments were
reported in The New York Sun.

On Tuesday night, Loftus praised a Cybercast News Service
article
published on Oct. 4, 2004, entitled Saddam Possessed WMD, Had
Extensive
Terror Ties.

The exclusive report featured documents showing numerous
efforts by
Saddam Hussein's regime to work with some of the world's most
notorious
terror organizations, including al Qaeda, to target Americans.

The documents also demonstrate that Saddam's government
possessed mustard
gas and anthrax, both considered weapons of mass destruction,
in the
summer of 2000, during the period in which United Nations
weapons
inspectors were not present in Iraq. The papers showed that
Iraq trained
dozens of terrorists inside its borders.

--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with
which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to
turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire.
Too bad
for them, it's failing.

--
ÐÏࡱá

DGVREIMAN wrote:

I told you so. All the "Bush Bashers" and "Hate America" types
need to belly up to the boiled Crow buffet on this one. Somehow,
however, they will still find a way to blame President Bush for
allowing Saddam to move his WMD into Syria and Lebanon before the
liberation invasion. There will be no mention of "we were wrong
about no WMD in Iraq" it will all come out as "its all Bush's
fault. Somehow, they will blame him for not revealing what he
knew earlier - right before all the Dimmys made complete and
utter fools out of themselves for claiming Saddam "never had
WMD."

You're stoned out of your mind and completely unworthy of a response.