From The Washington Post, 8/17/04:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6375-2004Aug16.html

Reprising a War With Words

By Dana Milbank

Tuesday, August 17, 2004; Page A13

Earlier this month, President Bush was almost done with a speech to a
group of minority journalists when he dropped a rather startling
proposal.

"We actually misnamed the war on terror," he said.

"It ought to be the Struggle Against Ideological Extremists Who Do Not
Believe in Free Societies Who Happen to Use Terror as a Weapon to Try
to Shake the Conscience of the Free World."

Or, if you prefer to abbreviate, SAIEWDNBIFSWHTUTAAWTTTSTCOTFW.

Ladies and gentlemen, the Bushism has returned.

The malapropisms that adorned Bush's 2000 campaign before going into
remission during much of his presidency have reemerged to garnish his
reelection bid.

In that same speech to the minority journalists this month, Bush
offered this definition of policy toward Native Americans:

"Tribal sovereignty means that, it's sovereign. I mean, you're a --
you're a -- you've been given sovereignty and you're viewed as a
sovereign entity. And therefore the relationship between the federal
government and tribes is one between sovereign entities."

The day before, when signing a Pentagon spending bill, Bush delighted
late-night comics when he said that our enemies "never stop thinking
about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

While Democrats rushed to agree with that accidental Bush admission,
they couldn't compete with the brief but forceful way he summed up his
candidacy the previous day in Davenport, Iowa:

"We stand for things."

As in 2000, the president seems to enjoy his linguistic miscues.

Appearing last week with Arnold Schwarzenegger, Bush said he and the
Austrian-born California governor "share a lot in common" -- good
wives, big biceps and "trouble with the English language."

The next day, he offered a curious wish for his audience in Oregon:

"I hope you leave here and walk out and say, 'What did he say?' "

The question was rhetorical, but it is possible a listener would at
times be truly befuddled about Bush's meaning.

There was this discussion of Iran policy last week:

"As you know, we don't have relationships with Iran," Bush said.

"I mean, that's -- ever since the late '70s, we have no contacts with
them, and we've totally sanctioned them. In other words, there's no
sanctions -- you can't -- we're out of sanctions."

In that same session, Bush might have listeners worried about their
civil liberties when he ran into plural trouble.

"Let me put it to you bluntly," he ventured.

"In a changing world, we want more people to have control over your
own life."

As if rerunning the 2000 campaign, the national and international
media are again examining Bush's syntax.

"Tongue-Twisted Bush Is Bent on Self-Harm," announced the Independent
newspaper of London.

"Dubya's New Word Blunder" was an Australian newspaper's take.
National Public Radio wondered if Bush's gaffes "might influence the
coming election."

Jacob Weisberg, editor of the online publication Slate and author of
four volumes of Bushisms, said his theory is that Bushisms subsided
after Bush took office "because the opportunities for him to go off
script became more limited."

Now, with Bush again campaigning, there are opportunities for verbal
mishaps almost daily.

At a campaign event in Florida last week, Bush could be heard joking
about an attempted ax murder of Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and
his wife.

"He wakes up one night and an ax-wielding group of men tried to
hatchet him to death, or ax him to death. I guess, you don't hatchet
somebody with an ax. And you don't ax them with a hatchet. He wakes
up, the glint of the blade coming at him, and he gets cut badly,
escapes. The guy hit his wife, who never recovered, really."

This year's standard for Bushisms was the Aug. 6 meeting of minority
journalists, where Bush offered a range of creative phrases.

Taxes?

"I cut the taxes on everybody. I didn't cut them. The Congress cut
them. I asked them to cut them."

Discrimination?

"I knew this was going to be an issue in our country, that there would
be people that say, 'There goes a Muslim-looking person.' "

Immigration reform?

"I have talked about it lately. I talked about it this winter."

War?

"I wish I wasn't the war president. Who in the heck wants to be a war
president? I don't."

Maybe that's why he calls it the Struggle Against Ideological
Extremists Who Do Not Believe in Free Societies Who Happen to Use
Terror as a Weapon to Try to Shake the Conscience of the Free World.

_____________________________________________________________

As the presidunce said in Davenport, Iowa;

"We stand for things."

Yup. And this cretin thinks he's being cute. Ah well.

Harry