| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Tom Jefferson" |
| Date: |
18 Nov 2003 03:50:43 PM |
| Object: |
SCO's greedy attempt to plunder Linux. |
SCO is a company that excels at buying software that it hasn't developed and
then suing those who have productively advanced the software. Linux is an
open source software that depends in large part on thousands if not millions
of volunteers to improve its software. SCO is little more than a parasite
feeding off others' work.
------------------------------------------------------
SCO Seeks to Block Novell-SUSE Deal
SCO May Start Targeting BSD Unixes
By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
November 18, 2003
SCO is planning to block Novell's acquisition of SUSE Linux on the grounds
that it has a non-compete agreement with Novell dating back to its purchase
of Unix.
The SCO Group has announced it plans to take legal action to block Novell
Inc.'s proposed purchase of SUSE Linux AG. The company claims that it has
inherited a non-compete agreement, which was part of a broader agreement
signed between Novell and one of SCO's ancestors, The Santa Cruz Operation
Inc., when Novell sold Unix's intellectual property rights.
In addition, Lindon, Utah-based SCO announced that it will broaden its code
copyright fight beyond IBM. In a press release, SCO stated that it is now
including "copyrighted code included in the 1994 settlement between Unix
Systems Laboratories, Inc. and Berkeley Software Design, Inc. in the
expanded scope protection of and defense against unauthorized use and
exploitation of SCO's intellectual property. SCO acquired this code and
associated copyrights in 1995 from Novell."
This means that SCO is opening the gates to possibly take action against the
open-source organizations behind such BSD-based operating systems as
FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD. In addition, since Apple Computer Inc.'s Mac OS
X is based on BSD Unix, Apple too could be targeted.
Want the story behind SCO's struggle for control of the Linux market? Check
out eWEEK.com's special report, "The Battle Over Unix."
Novell denies SCO's claims. According to Kevan Barney, Novell's Linux senior
manager of public relations, "There is no non-compete provision in those
contracts, and the pending acquisition of SUSE Linux does not violate any
agreement between Novell and SCO." In any case, he said, "Novell has
received no formal communication from SCO and ... Novell will respond in due
course should SCO choose to formally pursue this issue."
SCO has also announced that it has agreed to pay Boies, Schiller & Flexner
LLP and other law firms representing the company $1 million in cash and will
issue 400,000 shares of its common stock. "As a result of the issuance of
this consideration, SCO anticipates recording a charge to earnings of
approximately $8,956,000 in its fourth quarter that ended October 31, 2003.
This $8,956,000 charge to earnings is comprised of non-cash expense of
$7,956,000 related to the issuance of the 400,000 shares of common stock and
$1,000,000 in cash expense," the company announced.
Looking at this newest turn of events, Dan Kusnetzky, vice president of
system software research for analyst company International Data Corp., said,
"These are more litigation bills that The SCO Group will have to pay for.
Maybe they can find some more investors."
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1387528,00.asp
.
|
|
| User: "Rico" |
|
| Title: Re: SCO's greedy attempt to plunder Linux. |
19 Nov 2003 04:06:25 PM |
|
|
In article <3fba9437$0$91682$a32e20b9@news.nntpservers.com>, "Tom Jefferson" <tomj@democracy.org> wrote:
SCO is a company that excels at buying software that it hasn't developed and
then suing those who have productively advanced the software. Linux is an
open source software that depends in large part on thousands if not millions
of volunteers to improve its software. SCO is little more than a parasite
feeding off others' work.
------------------------------------------------------
SCO Seeks to Block Novell-SUSE Deal
SCO May Start Targeting BSD Unixes
By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Yawn. War amoung the clueless, these people have no idea why they can't
give Linux away on a world that pay$ for Windows. Total package, Complete
product. To phrases no one connected with linux and free software
understands.
November 18, 2003
SCO is planning to block Novell's acquisition of SUSE Linux on the grounds
that it has a non-compete agreement with Novell dating back to its purchase
of Unix.
The SCO Group has announced it plans to take legal action to block Novell
Inc.'s proposed purchase of SUSE Linux AG. The company claims that it has
inherited a non-compete agreement, which was part of a broader agreement
signed between Novell and one of SCO's ancestors, The Santa Cruz Operation
Inc., when Novell sold Unix's intellectual property rights.
In addition, Lindon, Utah-based SCO announced that it will broaden its code
copyright fight beyond IBM. In a press release, SCO stated that it is now
including "copyrighted code included in the 1994 settlement between Unix
Systems Laboratories, Inc. and Berkeley Software Design, Inc. in the
expanded scope protection of and defense against unauthorized use and
exploitation of SCO's intellectual property. SCO acquired this code and
associated copyrights in 1995 from Novell."
This means that SCO is opening the gates to possibly take action against the
open-source organizations behind such BSD-based operating systems as
FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD. In addition, since Apple Computer Inc.'s Mac OS
X is based on BSD Unix, Apple too could be targeted.
Want the story behind SCO's struggle for control of the Linux market? Check
out eWEEK.com's special report, "The Battle Over Unix."
Novell denies SCO's claims. According to Kevan Barney, Novell's Linux senior
manager of public relations, "There is no non-compete provision in those
contracts, and the pending acquisition of SUSE Linux does not violate any
agreement between Novell and SCO." In any case, he said, "Novell has
received no formal communication from SCO and ... Novell will respond in due
course should SCO choose to formally pursue this issue."
SCO has also announced that it has agreed to pay Boies, Schiller & Flexner
LLP and other law firms representing the company $1 million in cash and will
issue 400,000 shares of its common stock. "As a result of the issuance of
this consideration, SCO anticipates recording a charge to earnings of
approximately $8,956,000 in its fourth quarter that ended October 31, 2003.
This $8,956,000 charge to earnings is comprised of non-cash expense of
$7,956,000 related to the issuance of the 400,000 shares of common stock and
$1,000,000 in cash expense," the company announced.
Looking at this newest turn of events, Dan Kusnetzky, vice president of
system software research for analyst company International Data Corp., said,
"These are more litigation bills that The SCO Group will have to pay for.
Maybe they can find some more investors."
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1387528,00.asp
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PagCal" |
|
| Title: Re: SCO's greedy attempt to plunder Linux. |
19 Nov 2003 12:17:27 AM |
|
|
It's just a old fashoned stick-up.
Novell's (and IBM's) lawyers will take care of it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cameron L. Spitzer" |
|
| Title: Re: SCO's greedy attempt to plunder Linux. |
19 Nov 2003 02:12:25 AM |
|
|
In article <vrm2nnpnoj9lbe@corp.supernews.com>, PagCal wrote:
It's just a old fashoned stick-up.
Novell's (and IBM's) lawyers will take care of it.
It's a crap shoot. Microsoft could shop them a
right wing judge who buys into their open source
equals communism crap, won't admit that he doesn't
understand the case at all, and rules against the
GNU/Linux users purely on ideological grounds.
Open source equals communism isn't just Microsoft's
thing. Oracle, Adobe, and Macromedia are just as
strident in their own ways. Adobe killed its
own best product (Frame Maker) on its best
platform (Linux) just to hurt the open source movement.
They're scared. Software as a manufactured product
can't compete with software as a service, and they
know it. So they have to use men with guns.
It's a lot like what's happening to the recorded
music business. CDs in shrinkwrapped jewel boxes
can't compete with file sharing. The industry has
to change, and hasn't figured out how.
Any time there's a real technological revolution
the established players lose the value of their
incumbency. That's why the RIAA is suing little kids
for downloading files, it's why the oil companies
bought up all the photovoltaic manufacturers they could,
and it's why Microsoft and SCO are lashing out
hysterically against free software users.
Kinda like King Kanute ordering the tide not to come in.
Cameron
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|