Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation


 Politics > Politics-USA > Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 2

1
 

2
 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Krusty"
Date: 21 Oct 2004 08:56:21 PM
Object: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation
FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.
Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.
"It appears Ms. Mackris was living way beyond her means," a source close to
the situation told DRUDGE late Thursday. "She's up to her eyeballs in debt."
A spokeswoman for Mackris' attorneys, Morelli & Associates, said the firm
was unaware of their client's heavy load and laughed off any suggestion her
financial burden was a motivation for a cash demand from FOX.
Mackris, 33, and her attorney have been ordered to appear for a hearing in
New York State Supreme Court next week to divulge whether sex phone tapes
exist and "show cause" why they should not be opened to examination by
lawyers for O'Reilly and FOXNEWS.
.

User: "Jerry"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 03:01:28 AM
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net:


FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar
sexual harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month,
has I.O.U's scatted throughout the financial world, records show.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004
[she earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she
holds more than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.

"It appears Ms. Mackris was living way beyond her means," a source
close to the situation told DRUDGE late Thursday. "She's up to her
eyeballs in debt."

A spokeswoman for Mackris' attorneys, Morelli & Associates, said the
firm was unaware of their client's heavy load and laughed off any
suggestion her financial burden was a motivation for a cash demand
from FOX.

So what.


Mackris, 33, and her attorney have been ordered to appear for a
hearing in New York State Supreme Court next week to divulge whether
sex phone tapes exist and "show cause" why they should not be opened
to examination by lawyers for O'Reilly and FOXNEWS.

You know the sexual harrassment laws are only made for the little people.
The rich don't have to follow them.
If it were me or anybody else that doesn't have a TV show, we'd be moved to
another job or fired. But what does FOX do? They go after the woman
making a complaint. Shame on you FOX and shame on you Bill O'Reilly. I
hope this woman takes you both to the cleaners, you deserve it.
.
User: "Larry R Harrison Jr"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 25 Oct 2004 02:53:01 PM
Jerry <Nospam@here.com> wrote in message news:<Xns958A29BEEDB00Nospamherecom@216.168.3.50>...

You know the sexual harrassment laws are only made for the little people.
The rich don't have to follow them.

If it were me or anybody else that doesn't have a TV show, we'd be moved to
another job or fired. But what does FOX do? They go after the woman
making a complaint. Shame on you FOX and shame on you Bill O'Reilly. I
hope this woman takes you both to the cleaners, you deserve it.

Here we go again with this class envy nonsense. The rich are crooks,
the rest of us are poor little victims, wah wah wah.
It is totally lacking in any common sense to think an employer is
going to retain an employee who's suing it. If I were someone running
a company and someone working for me was suing me for whatever, I'd
fire them on the spot. If the law didn't allow me, I'd do it
anyway--even if it meant closing down the business just to spite them.
Maybe it should be shame on this little ***** who claims sexual
harassment but then RETURNS TO THE SAME JOB at the same company. Who
does that? And who can believe her after she does such a thing? It
gives her ZERO creditability.
The fact is, the environment has changed to where it's ridiculous how
easy it is to claim sexual harassment and have someone fired over it.
It's WAY too easy and the accused has way too difficult a time
defending themselves. I congratulate Bill O' Reilly for standing up
for himself and for Fox having the moxy to back him. Good for both of
them.
LRH
.
User: "Jerry"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 25 Oct 2004 07:50:09 PM
(Larry R Harrison Jr) wrote in
news:8a4fe96a.0410251153.20701f37@posting.google.com:

Jerry <Nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns958A29BEEDB00Nospamherecom@216.168.3.50>...

You know the sexual harrassment laws are only made for the little
people. The rich don't have to follow them.

If it were me or anybody else that doesn't have a TV show, we'd be
moved to another job or fired. But what does FOX do? They go after
the woman making a complaint. Shame on you FOX and shame on you Bill
O'Reilly. I hope this woman takes you both to the cleaners, you
deserve it.


Here we go again with this class envy nonsense. The rich are crooks,
the rest of us are poor little victims, wah wah wah.

It is totally lacking in any common sense to think an employer is
going to retain an employee who's suing it. If I were someone running

Thanks for proving my point. You'd be breaking the law.

a company and someone working for me was suing me for whatever, I'd
fire them on the spot. If the law didn't allow me, I'd do it
anyway--even if it meant closing down the business just to spite them.
Maybe it should be shame on this little ***** who claims sexual
harassment but then RETURNS TO THE SAME JOB at the same company. Who
does that? And who can believe her after she does such a thing? It
gives her ZERO creditability.

The fact is, the environment has changed to where it's ridiculous how
easy it is to claim sexual harassment and have someone fired over it.

Usually firings are avoided. You have a situation where two productive
employees have a problem with each other. One may well have done
something wrong. Or one may just be hypersensitive. You don't just
choose to fire the one thats not making you as much money. That's not
right. Quite often the compaintant just want the harrassment to stop.
It compounds things when the perpetrater is the boss and won't stop. In
any case you don't attack the complainer, you are just asking for more
trouble. FOX got what they deserve, it seems.

It's WAY too easy and the accused has way too difficult a time
defending themselves. I congratulate Bill O' Reilly for standing up
for himself and for Fox having the moxy to back him. Good for both of
them.

People aren't just playthings for dolts like you and O'Reilly. I know
you want to be rid of it, but the constitution isn't gone yet. People
have rights. And you would deserve to be taken to the cleaners as well.
Why? Because you didn't do the right thing.
.
User: "Larry R Harrison Jr"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 26 Oct 2004 12:32:04 PM
Jerry <Nospam@here.com> wrote in message news:<Xns958DD4C3F9F25Nospamherecom@216.168.3.50>...

You don't just choose to fire the one thats not making you as much money.

It's not about that, it's about throwing a trouble-maker out the door
where she belongs.

Quite often the compaintant just want the harrassment to stop.

Quite often the complaintant sees harassment where there IS none, or
brings it on herself for dressing like a hoochy-mama. In which case
she's equally culpuable along with the harasser. And no--that is NOT
the same thing as saying that someone who dresses in shorty-shorts etc
and gets raped 'asked for it.' By the same token, though, if you want
to be taken seriously as a professional, then act like one
yourself--and that starts with how you dress.
No one knows how Andrea dressed at work, but IF she was prone to
dressing like she was advertising her body for sale, she had no
business expecting to be looked at as anything other than a play doll
ready for fondling. (Not that it would make unwanted advanced okay,
but it would make her equally culpicable along with the aggressor.)

People aren't just playthings for dolts like you and O'Reilly.

Who said they were? Besides, by the same token, companies aren't just
play-things for opportunists looking for a way to line their pockets.

I know you want to be rid of it, but the constitution isn't gone yet.

When did I say I wanted to be rid of the constitution? And what does
this have to do with the constitution anyway? It's about false claims
of harassment for lining your pockets and smearing a right-wing
personality right smack in the middle of election-time, which last
time I looked has no constitutional basis in fact pro or con.

People have rights.

Of course they do. Companies have the right to fire troublemakers.
Women & men have the right to redress when they've been victimized,
and they have the right to work somewhere else when things aren't
going the way they'd like at their present place of employment--a
right Andrea exercised only to be foolhearty enough to return to the
very place she was at before where supposedly she had been mistreated.
Who does that--except for someone either stupid enough to have no
common sense or smart enough to see an opportunity for lining their
pockets under specious circumstances.
Fox News is taking a stand--they're saying loud & clear we're not
going to tolerate you using O' Reilly's celebrity status and the
current overboard sexual harassment laws to smear his name and
threaten to steal money from us. We're fighting the nonsense that has
become sexual harassment laws gone overboard and the obvious
transparency of your stealing from us under such a pretense.
Good for them. If I were rich I'd donate to their legal fund to show
my support.
LRH
.
User: "Jerry"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 26 Oct 2004 12:54:25 PM
(Larry R Harrison Jr) wrote in
news:8a4fe96a.0410260932.46406919@posting.google.com:

Jerry <Nospam@here.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns958DD4C3F9F25Nospamherecom@216.168.3.50>...

You don't just choose to fire the one thats not making you as much
money.


It's not about that, it's about throwing a trouble-maker out the door
where she belongs.

Even if she's right? Because if she is, then it is O'Reilly who is the
troublemaker.


Quite often the compaintant just want the harrassment to stop.


Quite often the complaintant sees harassment where there IS none, or
brings it on herself for dressing like a hoochy-mama. In which case
she's equally culpuable along with the harasser. And no--that is NOT
the same thing as saying that someone who dresses in shorty-shorts etc
and gets raped 'asked for it.' By the same token, though, if you want
to be taken seriously as a professional, then act like one
yourself--and that starts with how you dress.

No one knows how Andrea dressed at work, but IF she was prone to
dressing like she was advertising her body for sale, she had no
business expecting to be looked at as anything other than a play doll
ready for fondling. (Not that it would make unwanted advanced okay,
but it would make her equally culpicable along with the aggressor.)

Most can discern when a line is crossed. Rarely, some ignore the line
even when it has been pointed out to them.


People aren't just playthings for dolts like you and O'Reilly.


Who said they were? Besides, by the same token, companies aren't just
play-things for opportunists looking for a way to line their pockets.

The company should not take sides. It is clear to me they chose sides.
And are trying to protect O'Reilly and their ratings.


I know you want to be rid of it, but the constitution isn't gone
yet.


When did I say I wanted to be rid of the constitution? And what does
this have to do with the constitution anyway? It's about false claims
of harassment for lining your pockets and smearing a right-wing
personality right smack in the middle of election-time, which last
time I looked has no constitutional basis in fact pro or con.

People have rights.


Of course they do. Companies have the right to fire troublemakers.

The troublemakers, if illegally fired, have the right there also to take
the company to the cleaners.

Women & men have the right to redress when they've been victimized,
and they have the right to work somewhere else when things aren't
going the way they'd like at their present place of employment--a
right Andrea exercised only to be foolhearty enough to return to the
very place she was at before where supposedly she had been mistreated.
Who does that--except for someone either stupid enough to have no
common sense or smart enough to see an opportunity for lining their
pockets under specious circumstances.

Could be she saw no other avenue as she knew what O'Reilly and FOX would
do. It is a case of sexual harrassment - not merely a troublemaker.


Fox News is taking a stand--they're saying loud & clear we're not
going to tolerate you using O' Reilly's celebrity status and the
current overboard sexual harassment laws to smear his name and
threaten to steal money from us. We're fighting the nonsense that has
become sexual harassment laws gone overboard and the obvious
transparency of your stealing from us under such a pretense.

LOL Wait to see what happens after the election. FOX will back off,
O'Reilly will be history, and Ms. Mackris will be considerably richer.


Good for them. If I were rich I'd donate to their legal fund to show
my support.

You'd be throwing good money after bad.
.

User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 26 Oct 2004 02:46:41 PM
On 26 Oct 2004 10:32:04 -0700,
(Larry R Harrison
Jr) wrote:

Jerry <Nospam@here.com> wrote in message news:<Xns958DD4C3F9F25Nospamherecom@216.168.3.50>...

You don't just choose to fire the one thats not making you as much money.


It's not about that, it's about throwing a trouble-maker out the door
where she belongs.

By trouble maker you mean a bright young woman who preferred that Bill
O'Reilly not call here up and sexually harass her while sticking a
vibrator up his *****?
That sort of trouble-maker, Larry?

Quite often the compaintant just want the harrassment to stop.


Quite often the complaintant sees harassment where there IS none, or
brings it on herself for dressing like a hoochy-mama. In which case
she's equally culpuable along with the harasser. And no--that is NOT
the same thing as saying that someone who dresses in shorty-shorts etc
and gets raped 'asked for it.' By the same token, though, if you want
to be taken seriously as a professional, then act like one
yourself--and that starts with how you dress.

So if I should see you on the street wearing a nice suit it is OK if I
rob you?

No one knows how Andrea dressed at work, but IF she was prone to
dressing like she was advertising her body for sale, she had no
business expecting to be looked at as anything other than a play doll
ready for fondling. (Not that it would make unwanted advanced okay,
but it would make her equally culpicable along with the aggressor.)

Please promise us that O'Reilly is going to try that defense in open
court, Larry.
Yet more proof that people who watch Faux News are the dumbest
assholes on the planet.
Jingo
***
"GOP officials who talked to Bush-Cheney campaign leaders said the leaders have grown more worried about Ohio, Florida and other key states where Bush
lacks a lead with just 10 days until the election. A poll by Ohio University's Scripps Survey Research Center, completed Thursday night, found Kerry
leading 49 percent to 43 percent among registered voters, with a margin of error of five percentage points.
One Republican official described the mood at the top of the campaign as apprehensive. 'Grim' is too strong," the official said. "If we feel this way
a week from now, that will be grim."
--The Washington Post, October 24, 2004
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A57458-2004Oct23.html
.





User: "CHUCK MARTIN"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 28 Nov 2004 09:49:28 AM
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.

WHAT YOU ARE SEEING IS THE TYPICAL REPUBLI CON ACTION WHENEVER SOMEONE
EXPOSES REPUKES. THEY WILL IMMEDIATLY TURN THE TABLES AND TRY TO SLANDER
ANYONE WHO TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT A REPUKE WAYWARD PERSON. THIS IS REPUBLI
CON FILTH AS IT'S FINEST


Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.

I GUESS THAT MAKES HER A LIAR AND A CRIMINAL HUH. I GUESS THAT WAS HER
MOTIVE THEN HUH REPUKE BOY. ALL THIS ***** WRITTING THIS IS PROVING IS
THAT HE IS FRAUD AND A DISTORTER OF TRUTH TO SAVE THE PERVERT LOUDMOUTH O
LIELLY


"It appears Ms. Mackris was living way beyond her means," a source close
to
the situation told DRUDGE late Thursday. "She's up to her eyeballs in
debt."

OH, DRUDGE, THE OTHER REPUBLI CON CLOWN FOR THE REPUKE LOW LIFES. THATS
CRDIBLE THEN COMMING FROM DRUDGE AND ANOTHER ONE OF HIS CLANDESTINE PAID
LIARS


A spokeswoman for Mackris' attorneys, Morelli & Associates, said the firm
was unaware of their client's heavy load and laughed off any suggestion
her
financial burden was a motivation for a cash demand from FOX.

Mackris, 33, and her attorney have been ordered to appear for a hearing in
New York State Supreme Court next week to divulge whether sex phone tapes
exist and "show cause" why they should not be opened to examination by
lawyers for O'Reilly and FOXNEWS.

WELL LIAR BOY, I GUESS THEY MUST HAVE EXSISTED BECAUSE FOX AND VIBRATOR
BILLY PAID HER A FORTUNE TO QUAH THE TAPES FROM BEING HEARD. TYPICAL REPUBLI
CON SLANDER. THATS WHAT REPUBLI CONS DO BEAT



.

User: "Michael Lockhart"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 12:35:02 AM
"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.

Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.

Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740 per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750 per
month!
How could she *live*?!!?

"It appears Ms. Mackris was living way beyond her means," a source close
to
the situation told DRUDGE late Thursday. "She's up to her eyeballs in
debt."

Wow, yeah, sounds pretty horrific. 3 credit cards maxed and some school
loans. Yeah, that's "IOUs scattered throughout the financial world" and "up
to her eyeballs in debt".
What a piece of unmitigated crap.
Michael
.
User: "lee"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 08:33:37 AM
"Michael Lockhart" <ml1000@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net...


What a piece of unmitigated crap.

Michael


That shouldn't be a surpise. Krusty is what is called a *troll* in usenet
terminology. Feeding trolls is not recommended. It keeps 'em comin' back for
more.
.
User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 01:20:59 PM
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:33:37 -0500, "lee" <lee@invalid.net> wrote:

"Michael Lockhart" <ml1000@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net...


What a piece of unmitigated crap.

Michael

That shouldn't be a surpise. Krusty is what is called a *troll* in usenet
terminology. Feeding trolls is not recommended. It keeps 'em comin' back for
more.

O'Reilly Outsources Phone Sex to India
--Heavy Call Volume Cited
The Borowitz Report, October 18, 2004
http://www.borowitzreport.com/archive_rpt.asp?rec=987
Fox News personality Bill O’Reilly announced today that he has
outsourced all of his phone sex activities to India, citing “heavy
call volume” as the reason behind the move.
Starting this week, all phone sex normally handled by Mr. O’Reilly
will instead originate from a calling center in Bangalore, the
television host confirmed.
“There’s a time and a place for everything, and when it comes to phone
sex, the time is any time and the place is Bangalore,” Mr. O’Reilly
told his television audience.
At the Bangalore calling center, Surjit Khera, 31, was one of many
employees undergoing a three-week training program to help him
approximate Mr. O’Reilly’s phone-sex technique: “It is very hard to be
as sexy as Bill O’Reilly, but I am endeavoring to do so.”
Additionally, an automated “sexbot” will start calling random U.S.
phone numbers from Bangalore, using Mr. O’Reilly’s recorded voice to
guide the listener through a series of automated prompts.
“Press 1 if you would like to hear how I fast I’ll get a couple of
glasses of wine into you,” the sexbot purrs.
“Press 2 if you would like to hear about the naughty fun we’ll have in
the tub.”
Partially in response to the heavier-than-usual call volume, the
Federal Communications Commission announced today that it would
establish a new “do not call list” specifically for consumers who are
grossed out by the idea of Mr. O’Reilly calling them.
Elsewhere, independent candidate Ralph Nader said today that he was
considering dropping out of the presidential race to focus on wrecking
Christmas instead.
***
And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's called 'karma.'"
-- Bill "Talk Dirty to Me Baby" O'Reilly, "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060544244/qid=1098375644/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/002-7172694-9304017
"On or about May 2003 defendant BILL O"REILLY took defendant ANDREA MACKRIS and her college friend to dinner at
Da Silvanos. During the course of dinner, O"REILLY repeatedly propositioned the women, singing the praises of telephone sex,
offering to telephone them both, and suggesting that the three of them go to a hotel together and have the time of [their] lives.
.... O'REILLY further suggested that they use their sexuality to their own advantage so they'd have power over men, otherwise men
would have power over them."
--Suit filed October 13, 2004
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris9.html
.


User: "Larry R Harrison Jr"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 09:24:57 AM
Fox News fired her. In a word--good.
Anti-retaliation laws are wrong. Preventing revenge and preventing the
punishing of upstanding whistle blowers is one thing. But to
blanket-protect all such acts even when they're malicious opens
companies up to huge and ridiculous liabilities like this one. It puts
all the power in bitchy-aggressors like Andrea and leaves companies
with no way to defend themselves from false allegations.
How can you legitimately work for a company you're suing? You can't.
You move on, work somewhere else. Period. I hear CCN is probably
hiring.
Besides, who can believe someone who goes back to work for the very
person she claims harrassed her? That makes her creditability
absolutely ZERO.
Quite frankly, at times, I have considered starting my own small
business. If I ever do, cases like this illustrate why I may very well
never hire a woman to work for me. If she turns on the *****-mode and
pulls an Andrea Mackris, that's the end of me--even if I totally did
nothing wrong. Who needs it?
And that's too bad--not just for me, but for the 95% of all other
women who could potentially work for me or some other equally nervous
would-be entrepreneur (sp?). They become denied opportunities because
would-be entrepreneurs like myself or whoever don't want to open
ourselves up to potentially bankrupting situtations like this--brought
on by a post-Anita Hill environment that has clearly gone way out of
control to the point of assuming all men to be pigs and all women to
be victims, period.
Clearly, this case is nothing more than an opportunist-***** milking a
system run amok for her own financial benefit. Kudos to Fox for firing
her, and here's to hoping she wins nothing.
LRH
.
User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 01:23:04 PM
On 22 Oct 2004 07:24:57 -0700,
(Larry R Harrison
Jr) wrote:

Fox News fired her. In a word--good.

Anti-retaliation laws are wrong. Preventing revenge and preventing the
punishing of upstanding whistle blowers is one thing. But to
blanket-protect all such acts even when they're malicious opens
companies up to huge and ridiculous liabilities like this one. It puts
all the power in bitchy-aggressors like Andrea and leaves companies
with no way to defend themselves from false allegations.

Other than a team of corporate lawyers and unlimited resources
O'Reilly is the underdog here?
What color is the sky on your planet?
These Faux News groupies truly are a bunch of mud dumb fascists.
Jingo
***
And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's called 'karma.'"
-- Bill "Talk Dirty to Me Baby" O'Reilly, "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060544244/qid=1098375644/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/002-7172694-9304017
"On or about May 2003 defendant BILL O"REILLY took defendant ANDREA MACKRIS and her college friend to dinner at
Da Silvanos. During the course of dinner, O"REILLY repeatedly propositioned the women, singing the praises of telephone sex,
offering to telephone them both, and suggesting that the three of them go to a hotel together and have the time of [their] lives.
.... O'REILLY further suggested that they use their sexuality to their own advantage so they'd have power over men, otherwise men
would have power over them."
--Suit filed October 13, 2004
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris9.html
.


User: "Gogarty"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 07:17:28 AM
In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,

says...



"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740 per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750 per
month!

Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month. What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal. You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy to get
very deeply in debt.
.
User: "Michael Lockhart"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 07:08:54 PM
"Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote in message
news:YqOdnZf-F7nOZ-XcRVn-gQ@bway.net...

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net
says...

"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial
world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds
more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740
per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750
per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month.

Possibly, but I hugely overestimated her payments. We should hardly
overestimate her tax burden. Let's say she pays 40% taxes. That leaves her
$4660 per month. Subtract off the (inflated) expenses of $1360 and we get
$3300 net every month.

What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal.

That leaves her $1800 per month spending money. That's hardly "drowning in
debt".

You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy
to get
very deeply in debt.

Sure--but she *isn't* deeply in debt.
Michael
.
User: "Gogarty"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 23 Oct 2004 09:21:33 AM
In article <Fghed.189595$as2.89641@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net says...



"Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote in message
news:YqOdnZf-F7nOZ-XcRVn-gQ@bway.net...

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net
says...

"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial
world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds
more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740
per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750
per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month.


Possibly, but I hugely overestimated her payments. We should hardly
overestimate her tax burden. Let's say she pays 40% taxes. That leaves her
$4660 per month. Subtract off the (inflated) expenses of $1360 and we get
$3300 net every month.

What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal.


That leaves her $1800 per month spending money. That's hardly "drowning in
debt".

You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy
to get
very deeply in debt.


Sure--but she *isn't* deeply in debt.

Well, you just don't know and neither do I. Your 40% tax burden is too low.
Fifty percent is closer to the mark. Has she a car? That's $300 to $500 a month
in payments. About $400 a month to garage it. Maybe $200 to $300 a month to run
it. Does she dine out, go to the movies or the theater? Or, God help her, does
she own a boat, as we do? I am here to tell you as a Manhattan dweller in a
rent-stabilized apartment that you can go broke on $100,000 a year while
enjoying a far from lavish lifestyle.
.
User: "Michael Lockhart"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 23 Oct 2004 05:22:30 PM
"Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote in message
news:6fSdnYc1A5t49efcRVn-gg@bway.net...

In article <Fghed.189595$as2.89641@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net says...

"Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote in message
news:YqOdnZf-F7nOZ-XcRVn-gQ@bway.net...

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net
says...

"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar
sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial
world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004
[she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds
more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student
loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740
per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750
per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month.


Possibly, but I hugely overestimated her payments. We should hardly
overestimate her tax burden. Let's say she pays 40% taxes. That leaves
her
$4660 per month. Subtract off the (inflated) expenses of $1360 and we get
$3300 net every month.

What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal.


That leaves her $1800 per month spending money. That's hardly "drowning
in
debt".

You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy
to get
very deeply in debt.


Sure--but she *isn't* deeply in debt.


Well, you just don't know and neither do I.

?? We're discussing her finances as they have been leaked. We are
perfectly capable of making a decision on the matter with the given data.

Your 40% tax burden is too low.
Fifty percent is closer to the mark.

What are you talking about? 50% tax? She's not even making $100,000 a
year.

Has she a car? That's $300 to $500 a month
in payments. About $400 a month to garage it. Maybe $200 to $300 a month
to run
it.

She's in New York City. Of course she doesn't have a car. No one does.

Does she dine out, go to the movies or the theater? Or, God help her, does
she own a boat, as we do? I am here to tell you as a Manhattan dweller in
a
rent-stabilized apartment that you can go broke on $100,000 a year while
enjoying a far from lavish lifestyle.

That's completely irrelevant, isn't it? You could easily spend $1,000,000 a
year in New York City. So what? We're discussing her finances *as they
are*. As they are, she has plenty of money to live off, yet the article
lyingly said that she had "IOUs scattered all around the financial world" (3
credit cards, maybe) and was "up to her eyeballs in debt". That's not true.
Your point--that she couldn't live very comfortably in NYC off $100,000 a
year--is true but completely irrelevant. The point is, the article was a
total piece of crap. Even if she had *no* debt, $93,000 a year isn't a lot
of money in NYC. So what? They wanted to paint her as so desperate
monetarily that she'd try extortion to get money, when in fact she was doing
fine.
Michael
.
User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 23 Oct 2004 07:32:49 PM
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:22:30 -0400, "Michael Lockhart"
<ml1000@bellsouth.net> wrote:

"Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote in message
news:6fSdnYc1A5t49efcRVn-gg@bway.net...

In article <Fghed.189595$as2.89641@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net says...

"Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote in message
news:YqOdnZf-F7nOZ-XcRVn-gQ@bway.net...

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net
says...

"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar
sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial
world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004
[she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds
more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student
loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740
per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750
per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month.


Possibly, but I hugely overestimated her payments. We should hardly
overestimate her tax burden. Let's say she pays 40% taxes. That leaves
her
$4660 per month. Subtract off the (inflated) expenses of $1360 and we get
$3300 net every month.

What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal.


That leaves her $1800 per month spending money. That's hardly "drowning
in
debt".

You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy
to get
very deeply in debt.


Sure--but she *isn't* deeply in debt.


Well, you just don't know and neither do I.


?? We're discussing her finances as they have been leaked. We are
perfectly capable of making a decision on the matter with the given data.

Your 40% tax burden is too low.
Fifty percent is closer to the mark.


What are you talking about? 50% tax? She's not even making $100,000 a
year.

Has she a car? That's $300 to $500 a month
in payments. About $400 a month to garage it. Maybe $200 to $300 a month
to run
it.


She's in New York City. Of course she doesn't have a car. No one does.

Does she dine out, go to the movies or the theater? Or, God help her, does
she own a boat, as we do? I am here to tell you as a Manhattan dweller in
a
rent-stabilized apartment that you can go broke on $100,000 a year while
enjoying a far from lavish lifestyle.


That's completely irrelevant, isn't it? You could easily spend $1,000,000 a
year in New York City. So what? We're discussing her finances *as they
are*. As they are, she has plenty of money to live off, yet the article
lyingly said that she had "IOUs scattered all around the financial world" (3
credit cards, maybe) and was "up to her eyeballs in debt". That's not true.
Your point--that she couldn't live very comfortably in NYC off $100,000 a
year--is true but completely irrelevant. The point is, the article was a
total piece of crap. Even if she had *no* debt, $93,000 a year isn't a lot
of money in NYC. So what? They wanted to paint her as so desperate
monetarily that she'd try extortion to get money, when in fact she was doing
fine.

And here all of you are arguing over a Faux News smokescreen which has
been thrown up to take the heat off Bill 'Vibrator' O'Reilly.
He told her that this would happen to anyone who stood up to him.
Jingo
***
"Roger Ailes is who will go after you. I'm the street guy out front making loud noises about the issues,
but Ailes operates behind the scenes, strategizes and makes things happen so that one day BAM! The person
gets what's coming to them but never sees it coming."
--Bill " Name Your Vibrator" O'Reilly
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris12.html
.


User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 23 Oct 2004 10:41:36 AM
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:21:33 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu>
wrote:

In article <Fghed.189595$as2.89641@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net says...



"Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote in message
news:YqOdnZf-F7nOZ-XcRVn-gQ@bway.net...

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net
says...

"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial
world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds
more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740
per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750
per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month.


Possibly, but I hugely overestimated her payments. We should hardly
overestimate her tax burden. Let's say she pays 40% taxes. That leaves her
$4660 per month. Subtract off the (inflated) expenses of $1360 and we get
$3300 net every month.

What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal.


That leaves her $1800 per month spending money. That's hardly "drowning in
debt".

You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy
to get
very deeply in debt.


Sure--but she *isn't* deeply in debt.


Well, you just don't know and neither do I. Your 40% tax burden is too low.
Fifty percent is closer to the mark. Has she a car? That's $300 to $500 a month
in payments. About $400 a month to garage it. Maybe $200 to $300 a month to run
it. Does she dine out, go to the movies or the theater? Or, God help her, does
she own a boat, as we do? I am here to tell you as a Manhattan dweller in a
rent-stabilized apartment that you can go broke on $100,000 a year while
enjoying a far from lavish lifestyle.

Meanwhile Bill O'Reilly's lawyers are feverishly trying to settle this
case before the O'Reilly Sex Tapes come out on CD and DVD.
All these attacks on this young woman are just an affirmation of what
O'Reilly told here would happen if she reported him.
Jingo
***
"Roger Ailes is who will go after you. I'm the street guy out front making loud noises about the issues,
but Ailes operates behind the scenes, strategizes and makes things happen so that one day BAM! The person
gets what's coming to them but never sees it coming."
--Bill " Name Your Vibrator" O'Reilly
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris12.html
.


User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 07:16:48 PM
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 20:08:54 -0400, "Michael Lockhart"
<ml1000@bellsouth.net> wrote:

"Gogarty" <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu> wrote in message
news:YqOdnZf-F7nOZ-XcRVn-gQ@bway.net...

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net
says...

"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial
world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds
more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740
per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750
per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month.


Possibly, but I hugely overestimated her payments. We should hardly
overestimate her tax burden. Let's say she pays 40% taxes. That leaves her
$4660 per month. Subtract off the (inflated) expenses of $1360 and we get
$3300 net every month.

What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal.


That leaves her $1800 per month spending money. That's hardly "drowning in
debt".

You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy
to get
very deeply in debt.


Sure--but she *isn't* deeply in debt.

Compared to the Bush Administration she is a fiscal conservative.
Jingo
***
"Roger Ailes is who will go after you. I'm the street guy out front making loud noises about the issues,
but Ailes operates behind the scenes, strategizes and makes things happen so that one day BAM! The person
gets what's coming to them but never sees it coming."
--Bill " Name Your Vibrator" O'Reilly
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris12.html
.


User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 01:18:58 PM
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:17:28 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu>
wrote:

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,


says...



"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740 per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750 per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month. What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal. You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy to get
very deeply in debt.

What does all this have to do with the fact that O'Reilly is a serial
sexual harasser?
Jingo
***
And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's called 'karma.'"
-- Bill "Talk Dirty to Me Baby" O'Reilly, "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060544244/qid=1098375644/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/002-7172694-9304017
"On or about May 2003 defendant BILL O"REILLY took defendant ANDREA MACKRIS and her college friend to dinner at
Da Silvanos. During the course of dinner, O"REILLY repeatedly propositioned the women, singing the praises of telephone sex,
offering to telephone them both, and suggesting that the three of them go to a hotel together and have the time of [their] lives.
.... O'REILLY further suggested that they use their sexuality to their own advantage so they'd have power over men, otherwise men
would have power over them."
--Suit filed October 13, 2004
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris9.html
.
User: "CHUCK MARTIN"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 28 Nov 2004 10:00:12 AM
"Jingo" <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in message
news:9njin0pmpn9e03162gvqjpepfm3pltuh7c@4ax.com...

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:17:28 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu>
wrote:

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,
ml1000@bellsouth.net
says...



"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial
world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004
[she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds
more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740
per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750
per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month. What's her rent? If
she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal. You live
well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy
to get
very deeply in debt.


What does all this have to do with the fact that O'Reilly is a serial
sexual harasser?

Jingo
ILL TELL YOU WHAT IT MEANS, IT MEANS THAT THE REPUBLI CON SLANDER MACHINE
HAS TO MAKE HER LOOK BAD SO THAT REPUKE VIBRATOR BOY GETS A CLEAN BILL OF
MORALS. REPUBLI CON FILTH IN FULL PLAY HERE PEOPLE.
***
And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's
called 'karma.'"

-- Bill "Talk Dirty to Me Baby" O'Reilly, "The O'Reilly Factor
for Kids"

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060544244/qid=1098375644/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/002-7172694-9304017


"On or about May 2003 defendant BILL O"REILLY took defendant ANDREA
MACKRIS and her college friend to dinner at
Da Silvanos. During the course of dinner, O"REILLY repeatedly
propositioned the women, singing the praises of telephone sex,
offering to telephone them both, and suggesting that the three of them go
to a hotel together and have the time of [their] lives.
... O'REILLY further suggested that they use their sexuality to their own
advantage so they'd have power over men, otherwise men
would have power over them."

--Suit filed October 13, 2004
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris9.html

.

User: "Gogarty"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 04:47:25 PM
In article <9njin0pmpn9e03162gvqjpepfm3pltuh7c@4ax.com>,

says...



On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:17:28 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu>
wrote:

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,

ml1000@bellsouth.net

says...



"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740 per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750 per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month. What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal. You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy to

get

very deeply in debt.


What does all this have to do with the fact that O'Reilly is a serial
sexual harasser?

Nothing. But you know the drill by now, no?
.
User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 06:47:25 PM
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:47:25 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu>
wrote:

In article <9njin0pmpn9e03162gvqjpepfm3pltuh7c@4ax.com>,


says...



On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:17:28 -0400, Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu>
wrote:

In article <kZ0ed.39418$pi7.8123@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,

ml1000@bellsouth.net

says...



"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740 per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750 per
month!


Her take home pay would be more like $3,800 a month. What's her rent? If she
has a studio apartment for less thasn $1,500 she has a steal. You live well
enough but not lavishly in this city on $100,000 a year. It is very easy to

get

very deeply in debt.


What does all this have to do with the fact that O'Reilly is a serial
sexual harasser?


Nothing. But you know the drill by now, no?

I know that O'Reilly warned Mackris that it would do no good for her
to complain and would end up hurting her.
"Roger Ailes is who will go after you. I'm the street guy out front
making loud noises about the issues, but Ailes operates behind the
scenes, strategizes and makes things happen so that one day BAM! The
person gets what's coming to them but never sees it coming."
--Bill " Name Your Vibrator" O'Reilly
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris12.html
***
"Roger Ailes is who will go after you. I'm the street guy out front making loud noises about the issues,
but Ailes operates behind the scenes, strategizes and makes things happen so that one day BAM! The person
gets what's coming to them but never sees it coming."
--Bill " Name Your Vibrator" O'Reilly
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris12.html
.




User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 22 Oct 2004 01:17:37 PM
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 01:35:02 -0400, "Michael Lockhart"
<ml1000@bellsouth.net> wrote:

"Krusty" <Krusty@KissMyFuckinAss.fool> wrote in message
news:zMZdd.88159$yp.49293@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

FOXNEWS producer Andrea Mackris, who filed a multimillion dollar sexual
harassment suit against top talker O'Reilly earlier this month, has
I.O.U's
scatted throughout the financial world, records show.


Ooh, scattered (not scatted, I should hope!) throughout the financial world,
eh? Let's see if that's just *possibly* an exaggeration.

Mackris was making $93K a year when she returned to FOXNEWS in 2004 [she
earned $69,088 in 2003], but records dated October 18 show she holds more
than $37k in credit card debt, and $62k in student loans.


Oh, my God. She has $37,000 in credit card debt and some student loans?!
And she was only making $100,000 a year?! Let's see. The credit card
payments on the interest on $37,000 are, at most, 2% per month, or $740 per
month. Let's be *very* generous and say she pays off 1% of her student
loans per month (which is ridiculous). That's another $620. So she had
$1360 per month of payments on her debt. And she was only making $7750 per
month!

How could she *live*?!!?

"It appears Ms. Mackris was living way beyond her means," a source close
to
the situation told DRUDGE late Thursday. "She's up to her eyeballs in
debt."


Wow, yeah, sounds pretty horrific. 3 credit cards maxed and some school
loans. Yeah, that's "IOUs scattered throughout the financial world" and "up
to her eyeballs in debt".

What a piece of unmitigated crap.

"Roger Ailes is who will go after you. I'm the street guy out front
making loud noises about the issues, but Ailes operates behind the
scenes, strategizes and makes things happen so that one day BAM! The
person gets what's coming to them but never sees it coming."
--Bill " Name Your Vibrator" O'Reilly
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris12.html
***
And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's called 'karma.'"
-- Bill "Talk Dirty to Me Baby" O'Reilly, "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060544244/qid=1098375644/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/002-7172694-9304017
"On or about May 2003 defendant BILL O"REILLY took defendant ANDREA MACKRIS and her college friend to dinner at
Da Silvanos. During the course of dinner, O"REILLY repeatedly propositioned the women, singing the praises of telephone sex,
offering to telephone them both, and suggesting that the three of them go to a hotel together and have the time of [their] lives.
.... O'REILLY further suggested that they use their sexuality to their own advantage so they'd have power over men, otherwise men
would have power over them."
--Suit filed October 13, 2004
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris9.html
.
User: "Michael Lockhart"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 24 Oct 2004 08:52:02 PM
"Johnny Bravo" <tullum@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:0vSed.31043$yP2.4967@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...

Internal polling from the democrats are showing bad news for Kerry so he
is
diverting advertising to Pennsylvania and pullling out of Ohio and
Florida!!

False. Now, how's the price of rice in China these days?
Michael
.



User: "cLIeNUX user"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 21 Oct 2004 10:00:31 PM
Ann, doesn't anyone make rude remarks to you about loofahs and big boobs?
--
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
write-in candidate, President of the United States of America
platform ftp://linux01.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim/platform2
personal webpage http://linux01.gwdg.de/~rhohen
active in Usenet alt.politics colorg on IRC
humbubba@smart.net Maryland, USA
Ground troops out of Iraq Put the CIA under INS Save Darfur
Semi-legalize drugs Prosecute Bush Tighten the borders
Isolate Israel Tax churches halve military aquisitions
government jobs for Iraq-wounded soldiers and 9-11 survivors
please email my platform to friends, blogs and countrymen
-------------------------------------------------------------
.
User: "Jingo"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 21 Oct 2004 10:52:45 PM
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:00:31 -0000, r@cLIeNUX. (cLIeNUX user) wrote:

Ann, doesn't anyone make rude remarks to you about loofahs and big boobs?

Mackris Defends Herself Against the Faux News Smear Machine
--Says Her Dad is Mad as Hell, Out to Whup O'Reilly
Adam Nichols, The New York Daily News, October 21, 2004
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/244541p-209555c.html
Television producer Andrea Mackris speaks to the Daily News yesterday
about her sexual harassment lawsuit against Fox News' Bill O'Reilly.
Bill O'Reilly's accuser blasted him for pursuing a campaign of sleaze
against her - and warned that her 74-year-old dad is out for blood.
Andrea Mackris told the Daily News yesterday that the Fox talk-show
host had "a lot to answer for, to his wife and to his God."
In her first extensive newspaper interview, Mackris talked about how
hard the last two weeks have been on her and her dad.
"Like any father, he can't stand the idea that this happened to his
daughter," Mackris said with her lawyer, Benedict Morelli, at her
side. "If he had his way, he'd challenge Bill O'Reilly to a duel."
Her dad, Constantine, who lives in St. Louis, and the rest of her
family has known about the sex-harassment accusations from the start,
she said. "I can only imagine what my mom thinks."
Her mother Marilyn, 65, has multiple sclerosis and walks with two
canes.
Mackris, 33, said, "What's been going on, no human being could have
anticipated.
"Bill O'Reilly promised me that he would destroy any woman who accused
him of anything like this, and he's proving that. They've been telling
reporters stories about me having crushes on people, including
O'Reilly. That I get drunk in restaurants, that I have fights in
hotels, that I wrote a book to bring down Fox and O'Reilly. It's all
garbage.
"We tried to negotiate this in private and they've blown that. There
have been no negotiations since the night before they filed their
lawsuit."
Mackris, an associate producer with "The O'Reilly Factor," said her
boss started making improper comments in 2002; they escalated after
she returned to Fox following a stint at CNN this year, she said.
In three phone calls since August, he described his fantasies
involving her, talked of his sexual escapades and even told her to buy
a vibrator, she said.
O'Reilly filed a lawsuit hours before Mackris' suit, claiming that she
and Morelli demanded $60 million to buy her silence.
O'Reilly's camp pointed out in their lawsuit that Mackris made no
complaints to Fox News about the alleged harassment, and suggested
that she simply could have hung up on O'Reilly, had she wanted.
"This is not just my boss, this is an incredibly powerful man,"
Mackris explained. "When he asks me to jump, I say 'How high?' He'd
already said that if anybody threatened him in this way, he would drag
them through the mud.
"When he calls me and makes these comments, I'm supposed to say, 'Mr.
O'Reilly, that's immoral'? I'm supposed to complain to human resources
about this man, and then walk into work the next day to certain
retaliation? What is happening to me now would have happened then,
except I wouldn't have had a lawyer by my side."
O'Reilly's lawyers have asked a judge to force Mackris to turn over
any evidence, such as tape recordings, of O'Reilly's alleged
inappropriate comments.
"Why should we tell what evidence we have?" Morelli said. "They've
forced our hand enough. Now they're going on my timetable, and we want
this trial to be in court."
O'Reilly, a married father of two from Plandome, L.I., told The News
he has been told not to talk about the case.
"I feel badly for his family," Mackris said. "But I do not feel
guilty. How is it my fault, what has happened here? I could have stood
naked in front of him and there was still no way he should be allowed
to get away with what he did.
"I put my faith, my ambition, my trust into the people at [Fox] and
these people are now trying to destroy me."
***
And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's called 'karma.'"
-- Bill "Talk Dirty to Me Baby" O'Reilly, "The O'Reilly Factor for Kids"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060544244/qid=1098375644/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/002-7172694-9304017
"On or about May 2003 defendant BILL O"REILLY took defendant ANDREA MACKRIS and her college friend to dinner at
Da Silvanos. During the course of dinner, O"REILLY repeatedly propositioned the women, singing the praises of telephone sex,
offering to telephone them both, and suggesting that the three of them go to a hotel together and have the time of [their] lives.
.... O'REILLY further suggested that they use their sexuality to their own advantage so they'd have power over men, otherwise men
would have power over them."
--Suit filed October 13, 2004
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris9.html
.
User: "CHUCK MARTIN"

Title: Re: Scumbag Skank Andrea Mackris Trying A Shakedown Operation 28 Nov 2004 09:57:30 AM
BUT THE MORAL REPUBLI CONS WHO THINK THEY OWN GOD WILL SPIN THIS STORY INTO
THAT SHE IS A ***** OUT FOR MONEY AND BILLY O LIELLY THEIR VIBRATOR BOY IS A
GOOD MORAL GOD FEARING MAN. REPUKES ARE SO FUCKING PREDICTABLE
"Jingo" <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in message
news:qu0hn09k8t41qveh8csukehchnbjrvcpkp@4ax.com...

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:00:31 -0000, r@cLIeNUX. (cLIeNUX user) wrote:

Ann, doesn't anyone make rude remarks to you about loofahs and big boobs?


Mackris Defends Herself Against the Faux News Smear Machine

--Says Her Dad is Mad as Hell, Out to Whup O'Reilly

Adam Nichols, The New York Daily News, October 21, 2004

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/244541p-209555c.html

Television producer Andrea Mackris speaks to the Daily News yesterday
about her sexual harassment lawsuit against Fox News' Bill O'Reilly.

Bill O'Reilly's accuser blasted him for pursuing a campaign of sleaze
against her - and warned that her 74-year-old dad is out for blood.

Andrea Mackris told the Daily News yesterday that the Fox talk-show
host had "a lot to answer for, to his wife and to his God."

In her first extensive newspaper interview, Mackris talked about how
hard the last two weeks have been on her and her dad.

"Like any father, he can't stand the idea that this happened to his
daughter," Mackris said with her lawyer, Benedict Morelli, at her
side. "If he had his way, he'd challenge Bill O'Reilly to a duel."

Her dad, Constantine, who lives in St. Louis, and the rest of her
family has known about the sex-harassment accusations from the start,
she said. "I can only imagine what my mom thinks."

Her mother Marilyn, 65, has multiple sclerosis and walks with two
canes.

Mackris, 33, said, "What's been going on, no human being could have
anticipated.

"Bill O'Reilly promised me that he would destroy any woman who accused
him of anything like this, and he's proving that. They've been telling
reporters stories about me having crushes on people, including
O'Reilly. That I get drunk in restaurants, that I have fights in
hotels, that I wrote a book to bring down Fox and O'Reilly. It's all
garbage.

"We tried to negotiate this in private and they've blown that. There
have been no negotiations since the night before they filed their
lawsuit."

Mackris, an associate producer with "The O'Reilly Factor," said her
boss started making improper comments in 2002; they escalated after
she returned to Fox following a stint at CNN this year, she said.

In three phone calls since August, he described his fantasies
involving her, talked of his sexual escapades and even told her to buy
a vibrator, she said.

O'Reilly filed a lawsuit hours before Mackris' suit, claiming that she
and Morelli demanded $60 million to buy her silence.

O'Reilly's camp pointed out in their lawsuit that Mackris made no
complaints to Fox News about the alleged harassment, and suggested
that she simply could have hung up on O'Reilly, had she wanted.

"This is not just my boss, this is an incredibly powerful man,"
Mackris explained. "When he asks me to jump, I say 'How high?' He'd
already said that if anybody threatened him in this way, he would drag
them through the mud.

"When he calls me and makes these comments, I'm supposed to say, 'Mr.
O'Reilly, that's immoral'? I'm supposed to complain to human resources
about this man, and then walk into work the next day to certain
retaliation? What is happening to me now would have happened then,
except I wouldn't have had a lawyer by my side."

O'Reilly's lawyers have asked a judge to force Mackris to turn over
any evidence, such as tape recordings, of O'Reilly's alleged
inappropriate comments.

"Why should we tell what evidence we have?" Morelli said. "They've
forced our hand enough. Now they're going on my timetable, and we want
this trial to be in court."

O'Reilly, a married father of two from Plandome, L.I., told The News
he has been told not to talk about the case.

"I feel badly for his family," Mackris said. "But I do not feel
guilty. How is it my fault, what has happened here? I could have stood
naked in front of him and there was still no way he should be allowed
to get away with what he did.

"I put my faith, my ambition, my trust into the people at [Fox] and
these people are now trying to destroy me."



***
And guys, if you exploit a girl, it will come back to get you. That's
called 'karma.'"

-- Bill "Talk Dirty to Me Baby" O'Reilly, "The O'Reilly Factor
for Kids"

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060544244/qid=1098375644/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/002-7172694-9304017


"On or about May 2003 defendant BILL O"REILLY took defendant ANDREA
MACKRIS and her college friend to dinner at
Da Silvanos. During the course of dinner, O"REILLY repeatedly
propositioned the women, singing the praises of telephone sex,
offering to telephone them both, and suggesting that the three of them go
to a hotel together and have the time of [their] lives.
... O'REILLY further suggested that they use their sexuality to their own
advantage so they'd have power over men, otherwise men
would have power over them."

--Suit filed October 13, 2004
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1013043mackris9.html

.