Sen. Feinstein Resigns Military Appropriations Post



 Politics > Politics-USA > Sen. Feinstein Resigns Military Appropriations Post

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "THX1138"
Date: 02 Apr 2007 11:59:34 AM
Object: Sen. Feinstein Resigns Military Appropriations Post
WOW! would you look at that? A liberal senator caught in a scandal
with defense contracts! I guess this will get passed over while Cheney
and Haliburton will get raked over the coals!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was written by Fred Lucas, CNSNews.com Staff Writer
Government watchdog groups want more answers as to why Sen. Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., stepped down from a military appropriations
subcommittee at a time questions were being asked billions of dollars
in federal defense contracts going to her husband's companies.
Feinstein resigned her post as chairwoman of the Senate Subcommittee
on Military Construction Appropriations last week.
The decision came less than two months after Metro Newspapers, a group
of alternative weekly papers in northern California, detailed the
number of defense contracts awarded to Perini Corp. and URS Corp.,
both of which her husband, Richard C. Blum, has ownership, according
to the newspapers.
The investigation was partially funded by the Investigative Fund of
The Nation Institute, a non-profit organization affiliated with the
liberal magazine The Nation.
"This was a critique from the left," Tom Fitton, president of Judicial
Watch, a conservative public interest group, told Cybercast News
Service. "These were left-leaning papers. The fact that she stepped
down from the committee lends credibility to the charges."
Fitton said this is something Judicial Watch wanted to further
investigate, possibly by seeking public documents on the matter and by
asking the Senate Ethics Committee to look into the matter for a
possible conflict of interest on Feinstein's part.
"On the face of it, it seems she at least had influence on how
contracts were awarded," Fitton said. "There should be an
investigation."
Feinstein's press office was contacted several times Friday by
Cybercast News Service, but her office did not provide a statement on
the matter at the end of the day.
The California weeklies detailed examples that included a subcommittee
hearing in which Feinstein asked Pentagon officials about increasing
anti-terrorism protection for Army bases.
The next year, in March 2003, Feinstein asked why the funds for anti-
terror protection had not been spent. Just over a month later, URS
announced a $600 million contract to provide services for U.S. Army
bases that included anti-terrorism force protection.
In another instance, Feinstein asked another military official when
money would be spent on a maintenance facility for the C-17 Hickam Air
Base in Hawaii. URS later announced a $42 million contract to build
it.
Also, Feinstein's subcommittee in mid-2005 approved funds to reinforce
roofs at military stations in Iraq, and in October of that year,
Perini got a $185 million federal contract for that purpose, the
papers reported.
The matter should be probed further, said Kenneth Boehm, chairman of
the National Legal and Policy Center, a conservative government
watchdog group. However, he isn't that confident in the Senate's
ability to police itself.
"The real problem is there is too little objectivity," Boehm told
Cybercast News Service. "Congress needs an independent watchdog. The
ethics committees are partisan. They have an equal number of
Republicans and Democrats, but the reality is that things don't get
looked at that should get looked at."
Meanwhile, Melanie Sloan, executive director of the liberal watchdog
group Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington, reportedly said
the Feinstein matter could eclipse other congressional scandals.
"There are a number of members of Congress with conflicts of
interest," Sloan told Metro Newspapers. "But because of the amount of
money involved, Feinstein's conflict of interest is an order of
magnitude greater than those conflicts."
The paper proudly reported Feinstein's exit from the Senate panel on
its website last week, as reporter Peter Byrne stressed that
Feinstein's subcommittee had jurisdiction over medical treatment for
veterans long before the poor conditions were exposed at the Walter
Reed Army Hospital.
"You would think that, considering all the money Feinstein's family
has pocketed by waging global warfare while ignoring the plight of
wounded American soldiers, she would show a smidgeon of shame and
resign from the entire Senate, not just a subcommittee," Byrne wrote.
"Conversely, you'd think she might stick around (the subcommittee) to
try to fix the medical-care disaster she helped engineer for the vets
who were suckered into fighting her and (President) Bush's panoply of
unjust wars," Byrne added
.

User: "Red"

Title: Re: Sen. Feinstein Resigns Military Appropriations Post 02 Apr 2007 02:08:33 PM
On Apr 2, 12:59?pm, "THX1138" <xxxTHX1138...@yahoo.com> wrote:

WOW! would you look at that? A liberal senator caught in a scandal
with defense contracts! I guess this will get passed over while Cheney
and Haliburton will get raked over the coals!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This article was written by Fred Lucas, CNSNews.com Staff Writer

Government watchdog groups want more answers as to why Sen. Dianne
Feinstein, D-Calif., stepped down from a military appropriations
subcommittee at a time questions were being asked billions of dollars
in federal defense contracts going to her husband's companies.

Feinstein resigned her post as chairwoman of the Senate Subcommittee
on Military Construction Appropriations last week.

The decision came less than two months after Metro Newspapers, a group
of alternative weekly papers in northern California, detailed the
number of defense contracts awarded to Perini Corp. and URS Corp.,
both of which her husband, Richard C. Blum, has ownership, according
to the newspapers.

The investigation was partially funded by the Investigative Fund of
The Nation Institute, a non-profit organization affiliated with the
liberal magazine The Nation.

"This was a critique from the left," Tom Fitton, president of Judicial
Watch, a conservative public interest group, told Cybercast News
Service. "These were left-leaning papers. The fact that she stepped
down from the committee lends credibility to the charges."

Fitton said this is something Judicial Watch wanted to further
investigate, possibly by seeking public documents on the matter and by
asking the Senate Ethics Committee to look into the matter for a
possible conflict of interest on Feinstein's part.

"On the face of it, it seems she at least had influence on how
contracts were awarded," Fitton said. "There should be an
investigation."

Feinstein's press office was contacted several times Friday by
Cybercast News Service, but her office did not provide a statement on
the matter at the end of the day.

The California weeklies detailed examples that included a subcommittee
hearing in which Feinstein asked Pentagon officials about increasing
anti-terrorism protection for Army bases.

The next year, in March 2003, Feinstein asked why the funds for anti-
terror protection had not been spent. Just over a month later, URS
announced a $600 million contract to provide services for U.S. Army
bases that included anti-terrorism force protection.

In another instance, Feinstein asked another military official when
money would be spent on a maintenance facility for the C-17 Hickam Air
Base in Hawaii. URS later announced a $42 million contract to build
it.

Also, Feinstein's subcommittee in mid-2005 approved funds to reinforce
roofs at military stations in Iraq, and in October of that year,
Perini got a $185 million federal contract for that purpose, the
papers reported.

The matter should be probed further, said Kenneth Boehm, chairman of
the National Legal and Policy Center, a conservative government
watchdog group. However, he isn't that confident in the Senate's
ability to police itself.

"The real problem is there is too little objectivity," Boehm told
Cybercast News Service. "Congress needs an independent watchdog. The
ethics committees are partisan. They have an equal number of
Republicans and Democrats, but the reality is that things don't get
looked at that should get looked at."

Meanwhile, Melanie Sloan, executive director of the liberal watchdog
group Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington, reportedly said
the Feinstein matter could eclipse other congressional scandals.

"There are a number of members of Congress with conflicts of
interest," Sloan told Metro Newspapers. "But because of the amount of
money involved, Feinstein's conflict of interest is an order of
magnitude greater than those conflicts."

The paper proudly reported Feinstein's exit from the Senate panel on
its website last week, as reporter Peter Byrne stressed that
Feinstein's subcommittee had jurisdiction over medical treatment for
veterans long before the poor conditions were exposed at the Walter
Reed Army Hospital.

"You would think that, considering all the money Feinstein's family
has pocketed by waging global warfare while ignoring the plight of
wounded American soldiers, she would show a smidgeon of shame and
resign from the entire Senate, not just a subcommittee," Byrne wrote.

"Conversely, you'd think she might stick around (the subcommittee) to
try to fix the medical-care disaster she helped engineer for the vets
who were suckered into fighting her and (President) Bush's panoply of
unjust wars," Byrne added

How dare you. Don't you know liberal Dummycrats get free passes on
breaking the law. Only Republicans get prosecuted.
.

User: "George Leroy Tyrebiter Jr"

Title: Re: Sen. Feinstein Resigns Military Appropriations Post 04 Apr 2007 06:23:30 AM
THX1138 wrote:

WOW! would you look at that? A liberal senator caught in a scandal
with defense contracts! I guess this will get passed over while Cheney
and Haliburton will get raked over the coals!

Neither Feinstein nor Cheney acted improperly. In both cases
arrangements were created to preclude either from self-enrichment.
The arrangement concerning Feinstein was approved by the Senate Ethics
Committee - with the Republicans agreeing it was ethically sound.
And though I think Cheney should be arrested and tried for war crimes, I
have read the terms of his Halliburton stock options and I agree that he
can not profit from them - any increase in value goes to charity.
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Report: Husband of Sen. Feinstein (D) Made $Killing$ Via Appropriations of Wife's Committee
FBI probes personal finances of Republican House Appropriations chair
DemocRATS TRASHING EACH OTHER (ARE YOU ENJOYING THIS TOO?) - House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-Wis.) berated a woman who approached him in a Congressional corridor, claiming that "idiot liberals" don't understand the war supplemen
GOP House Appropriations Committee chairman under corruption investigation
DCF's notorious failures are outpacing even the big increases inits appropriations because family disintegration itself is outpacing thoseappropriations.
Calls for resignation of pork-filled Republican Senate Appropriations chairman.
Sen. Feinstein approved billions in no-bid military contracts for her husband's businesses
US Navy secretary - alleged military code violations in Sen. John Kerry's Silver Star award.
Re: Sen. Kerry's wife has Enron's Ken Lay on her payroll
GOP Sen. McCain says Bush needs to level with the American people about Iraq.
IF SEN. LIEBERMAN HAS ISRAELI CITIZENSHIP, SHOULD HE TELL US?
Sen. Hillary Clinton to spend Thanksgiving with troops in Afghanistan, visit Iraq
Desperate Bu$h Mails Ricin to Sen. Bill Frist
Sen Dashole new "nice"
Sen McCain OK with War without Imminent threat to US (will substitute possible threats to Israel)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER