| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" |
| Date: |
25 Mar 2006 02:24:32 PM |
| Object: |
Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
Those opposed to truth will stop reading here...
1. Those opposed to Christianity (literally anti-christ-ian) state
that they are not opposed to religion, per se, but only to religion in
the state.
2. What is the state? Is it only the branches of government mentioned
in the Constitution (Executive, Congress, and the courts)? If so, why
are we using the church-state issue to talk about schools? Those
opposed to faith say that the chruch-state restriction, that they say
exists, extends to groups that receive government funds, as well.
Take note that the VERY SAME groups that are calling for the separation
of church and state (socialists) are the VERY SAME ones calling for
more and more things to be regulated and run by the government.
End Goal: When religion is banned from the state and everything is
funded by the state, religion is effectively shut down.
Do you receive federal funds? Think about it (EIC, Tax Credits,
Government Grants, etc). What stops them from claiming you are an
extension of the government that cannot be religious?
Kenny Clifton
-author of the Red Letter Stories
http://www.christianjedi.com/redletterstories.html
.
|
|
| User: "Dominic Torrazzi" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
25 Mar 2006 05:07:20 PM |
|
|
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <kands00@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143318272.682772.95700@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Those opposed to truth will stop reading here...
1. Those opposed to Christianity (literally anti-christ-ian) state
that they are not opposed to religion, per se, but only to religion in
the state.
Is your religion so sensitive and weak that it must categorize any non
christian or secular adherent as an attacker?
2. What is the state? Is it only the branches of government mentioned
in the Constitution (Executive, Congress, and the courts)? If so, why
are we using the church-state issue to talk about schools?
Because public schools are part of the bureaucracy, and the burocracy is
part of government.
Those
opposed to faith say that the chruch-state restriction, that they say
exists, extends to groups that receive government funds, as well.
If they use taxpayer dollars, they should.
Take note that the VERY SAME groups that are calling for the separation
of church and state (socialists)
Socialists? So were the Baptists, who were the driving force behind church
state separation in the colonies, socialists?
Are these religious groups that publicly support church state separation
socialists as well?
American Baptist Churches USA
Church of the Brethren
Episcopal Church in America
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
Mennonite Central Committee
Presbyterian Church (USA)
Has published policy statement in support of religious liberty: God Alone is
Lord of the Conscience.
Historically strong supporters of religious liberty and the principle of
church-state separation.
Soka Gakkai International - USA
Union of American Hebrew Congregations
United Church of Christ
Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations
United Methodist Church
are the VERY SAME ones calling for
more and more things to be regulated and run by the government.
So if the establishment clause were weakened, what do you think would happen
to religion? It would be regulated and run by the government.
End Goal: When religion is banned from the state and everything is
funded by the state, religion is effectively shut down.
Ummmm, that was quite a leap, Kenny.
The establishment clause as it works has protected your church from being
interfered with by the government. Tell me exactly how your church, right
now, is being shut down. Remember, churches are tax exempt. Do you really
want government taking away the tax exemption, regulating your religion, and
shutting it down?
Do you receive federal funds? Think about it (EIC, Tax Credits,
Government Grants, etc). What stops them from claiming you are an
extension of the government that cannot be religious?
Common sense. Of which you lack.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Wide Eyed in Wonder" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
25 Mar 2006 05:52:37 PM |
|
|
Dominic Torrazzi wrote:
End Goal: When religion is banned from the state and everything is
funded by the state, religion is effectively shut down.
Ummmm, that was quite a leap, Kenny.
The establishment clause as it works has protected your church from being
interfered with by the government.
So, the fact that the AU and other groups want to use courts to silence
churches are what if not interferance?
Kenny Clifton
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dominic Torrazzi" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
26 Mar 2006 10:36:27 AM |
|
|
"Wide Eyed in Wonder" <kands00@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1143330757.537472.96580@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Dominic Torrazzi wrote:
End Goal: When religion is banned from the state and everything is
funded by the state, religion is effectively shut down.
Ummmm, that was quite a leap, Kenny.
The establishment clause as it works has protected your church from being
interfered with by the government.
So, the fact that the AU and other groups want to use courts to silence
churches are what if not interferance?
Please provide even one instance of this.
Just one.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JC" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
26 Mar 2006 12:27:34 PM |
|
|
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
Dominic Torrazzi wrote:
End Goal: When religion is banned from the state and everything is
funded by the state, religion is effectively shut down.
Ummmm, that was quite a leap, Kenny.
The establishment clause as it works has protected your church from being
interfered with by the government.
So, the fact that the AU and other groups want to use courts to silence
churches are what if not interferance?
Kenny Clifton
The AU wants churches to stay out of government, just like people want
government to stay out of the church.
I think too many people forget that it is a two way street.
The government has NO right to tell anyone how they should worship and
churches should not force the government to teach *their* version of
whatever religious doctrine they follow.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Midjis" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
26 Mar 2006 12:55:19 AM |
|
|
Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
So, the fact that the AU and other groups want to use courts to silence
churches are what if not interferance?
Churches that attempt to impose their own religious opinions and rules on
those who do not elect to follow that particular religion should be
silenced in that sense. Religion is a personal matter and should not be
forced on anyone.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Midjis" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
04 Apr 2006 03:01:31 PM |
|
|
Anno Domini wrote:
Fine. Ok. If sodomy and lesbianism is ok with you...
Pretty much. I cannot say sodomy is my own personal cup of tea, but I
see no reason to object to consensual intimate activity between adults.
And I have no particular problem with lesbianism. So yes, they are both
'ok with me', in their place, if consensual, legal, and if they are
harming no-one else.
you shouldn't
mind atall or object if I were to tell a little white lie or two to
Bob and Cary who are trying to kill me and wipe my voice from the face
of the earth and the internet.
You see, you set as a premise my lack of objection to certain sexual
activities, and upon that premise you base an assumption that I should
therefore approve of dishonesty on your part.
This reasoning is invalid, though I can imagine the artificial pseudo-
logic that brought you to the conclusion (if I do not object to one 'evil
sin' then I cannot object to another). This is - I think - the first
time I have seen you openly admit to dishonesty, though, so perhaps there
is progress there, of a sort. But it does not follow that I approve of
dishonesty - and I do not. 'Little white lies' have no place here. I
cannot say I am entirely open on Usenet - I do not wish to place all my
personal details on the Internet for everyone to see - but in cases where
I do not wish to reveal something I prefer to simply say so.
As to the notion that Bob and Cary are trying to kill you and wipe you
from the Net and the world, this strikes me as nothing less than
unmitigated paranoia. Not to mention being rather self-absorbed. If you
imagine that you are important enough to warrant any other poster
committing murder to get rid of you, then I wonder why you are still
here? I personally do not wish to kill you. I do not wish to kill
anyone. As a matter of fact, I take no particular pleasure from our
constant opposition on this group. But if I were wanting to remove you
in such a way (and lest your paranoia fire up again, no, this is NOT a
threat - merely an observation), I cannot imagine that I would waste time
debating religion with you on a newsgroup beforehand. So what precisely
makes you imagine that these two fellows would?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
06 Apr 2006 08:28:25 PM |
|
|
Midjis wrote:
Anno Domini wrote:
Fine. Ok. If sodomy and lesbianism is ok with you...
Pretty much. I cannot say sodomy is my own personal cup of tea, but I
see no reason to object to consensual intimate activity between adults.
And I have no particular problem with lesbianism. So yes, they are both
'ok with me', in their place, if consensual, legal, and if they are
harming no-one else.
Fine. Ok. I've done my job by telling you it is against the Law of
God. The rest is up to you. Almost. It actually isn't all up to you in
that the conviction of the Spirit of God comes into play within this
equation. However, that's not up to me but to God himself.
I lie not.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Midjis" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
07 Apr 2006 06:44:27 AM |
|
|
Anno Domini wrote:
Fine. Ok. I've done my job by telling you it is against the Law of
God. The rest is up to you.
Good! Yes. You are correct. This is such a simple concept, yet so many
who think of themselves as preachers, pastors, and others of the like
either cannot grasp it or choose to ignore it. Yes, you are entitled to
tell me what your God wants of me. I would have no objection to you doing
so - I simply recognise it as a necessary part of your faith.
Where it crosses the line is when you start to take on God's own mantle -
where you try to dictate what He will do and what He will not, based on the
human-written words of a book as you interpret them. It is not your place
to speak God's mind, any more than it is your place to tell Cary that he
has offended me.
Almost. It actually isn't all up to you in
that the conviction of the Spirit of God comes into play within this
equation. However, that's not up to me but to God himself.
Indeed. I agree so strongly that I will say it myself: It is NOT up to
YOU, but to GOD HIMSELF.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
08 Apr 2006 08:46:16 PM |
|
|
Midjis wrote:
Anno Domini wrote:
Fine. Ok. I've done my job by telling you it is against the Law of
God. The rest is up to you.
Good! Yes. You are correct. This is such a simple concept, yet so many
who think of themselves as preachers, pastors, and others of the like
either cannot grasp it or choose to ignore it. Yes, you are entitled to
tell me what your God wants of me. I would have no objection to you doing
so - I simply recognise it as a necessary part of your faith.
Where it crosses the line is when you start to take on God's own mantle -
where you try to dictate what He will do and what He will not, based on the
human-written words of a book as you interpret them. It is not your place
to speak God's mind, any more than it is your place to tell Cary that he
has offended me.
Yes it is. Cary offends everyone by not only despising the Word of God
found in the Holy Bible, but also by deception trying to trick folks
out of their Constitutional rights.
You see, leftists hate the FREEDOM of anything. But they pretend to be
nice guys by promoting the freedom to sin, and not telling anyone that
sinners become slaves (and therefore not FREE).
John 8:34 "Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin
is the servant of sin." - Jesus
Example:
Once you commit adultry, it's easier to do it again and again. Then
you become enslaved by sex.
Thus, Jesus came and made Levitical Law even tougher....
Matthew 5:27-28 "Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time,
'Thou shalt not commit adultery': But I say unto you, That
whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery
with her already in his heart." - Jesus
in "tough love",
Jd, A.D. 2006
.
|
|
|
| User: "Midjis" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
09 Apr 2006 09:20:38 AM |
|
|
Anno Domini wrote:
It is not your place to speak God's mind, any more than it is your
place to tell Cary that he has offended me.
Yes it is. Cary offends everyone by not only despising the Word of God
found in the Holy Bible, but also by deception trying to trick folks
out of their Constitutional rights.
God has the power to speak for Himself. You imagine yourself specially
chosen, perhaps - but you are merely the created, like the rest of us.
He does not need your help - and you are spectacularly self-obsessed if
you believe that He does.
As for me, *I* will decide when I am offended and when I am not.
However important you might imagine you are, I think others will
recognise that you do not speak for me, and that any declaration you
might make on my behalf is irrelevant.
You see, leftists hate the FREEDOM of anything. But they pretend to be
nice guys by promoting the freedom to sin, and not telling anyone that
sinners become slaves (and therefore not FREE).
I do not presume to imagine that the world falls neatly into pigeonholes
of right and left. As I have said before, I am not convinced that
anyone really knows what either term means any more. Most people here
seem to just pick one of the two and throw it at anyone they disagree
with every chance they get.
Example:
Once you commit adultry, it's easier to do it again and again. Then
you become enslaved by sex.
So sex equates to adultery for you? That might explain a thing or two,
if I were prone to psychoanalysis.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
11 Apr 2006 09:00:32 PM |
|
|
Midjis wrote:
Anno Domini wrote:
It is not your place to speak God's mind, any more than it is your
place to tell Cary that he has offended me.
Yes it is. Cary offends everyone by not only despising the Word of God
found in the Holy Bible, but also by deception trying to trick folks
out of their Constitutional rights.
God has the power to speak for Himself.
From the getgo, God showed that he sent men to save other men....
Acts 11:12-14 "And the spirit bade me go with them, nothing
doubting. Moreover these six brethren accompanied me, and we entered
into the man's house: And he shewed us how he had seen an angel in his
house, which stood and said unto him, 'Send men to Joppa, and call for
Simon, whose surname is Peter; Who shall tell thee words, whereby thou
and all thy house shall be saved'."
BTW, how do you reckon evolution when it comes to the angels of God?
From what did they evolve?
As for me, *I* will decide when I am offended and when I am not.
However important you might imagine you are, I think others will
recognise that you do not speak for me, and that any declaration you
might make on my behalf is irrelevant.
Not true. Nothing I say is irrelevant.
Jd (witness of God)
"I have declared, and have saved, and I have shewed, when there was no
strange god among you: therefore ye are my witnesses, saith the Lord,
that I am God." (Isaiah 43:12)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Midjis" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
12 Apr 2006 04:51:25 AM |
|
|
Anno Domini wrote:
From the getgo, God showed that he sent men to save other men....
Even assuming that you are one of these men, you cannot save man or woman
who does not wish to be saved. I do not wish to be saved by any God such
as you describe.
BTW, how do you reckon evolution when it comes to the angels of God?
From what did they evolve?
There is no rational reason to believe such beings exist. There is only
Biblical insistence that they did, which for you is unassailable truth, and
which for me is myth.
Not true. Nothing I say is irrelevant.
Jd (witness of God)
Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall. -
Proverbs 16:18
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
12 Apr 2006 09:11:53 PM |
|
|
Midjis wrote:
Anno Domini wrote:
From the getgo, God showed that he sent men to save other men....
Even assuming that you are one of these men, you cannot save man or woman
who does not wish to be saved. I do not wish to be saved by any God such
as you describe.
Why not? Why be so negative? The "Gospel" is by definition "Good
News".
Jd
tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito (Latin for: "you should not
give in to evils, but proceed ever more boldly against them"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
13 Apr 2006 11:17:36 AM |
|
|
In article <l3hr32tnub7ldhgj0fuc2p61t2iih74eeb@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
Midjis wrote:
Anno Domini wrote:
From the getgo, God showed that he sent men to save other men....
Even assuming that you are one of these men, you cannot save man or woman
who does not wish to be saved. I do not wish to be saved by any God such
as you describe.
Why not? Why be so negative? The "Gospel" is by definition "Good
News".
Sort of like the Catholic Church is by definition "Universal".
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
15 Apr 2006 08:54:22 PM |
|
|
Cary Kittrell wrote:
In article <l3hr32tnub7ldhgj0fuc2p61t2iih74eeb@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
Midjis wrote:
Anno Domini wrote:
From the getgo, God showed that he sent men to save other men....
Even assuming that you are one of these men, you cannot save man or woman
who does not wish to be saved. I do not wish to be saved by any God such
as you describe.
Why not? Why be so negative? The "Gospel" is by definition "Good
News".
Sort of like the Catholic Church is by definition "Universal".
-- cary
Well, sorta.
Great post BTW. One of your best of late.
Jd
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
10 Apr 2006 12:29:59 PM |
|
|
In article <4aog325halv75d167hvs7j45md8eurd9q7@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
{...}
Yes it is. Cary offends everyone by not only despising the Word of God
found in the Holy Bible, but also by deception trying to trick folks
out of their Constitutional rights.
You see, leftists hate the FREEDOM of anything. But they pretend to be
nice guys by promoting the freedom to sin, and not telling anyone that
sinners become slaves (and therefore not FREE).
John 8:34 "Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin
is the servant of sin." - Jesus
Example:
Once you commit adultry, it's easier to do it again and again. Then
you become enslaved by sex.
Thus, Jesus came and made Levitical Law even tougher....
Matthew 5:27-28 "Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time,
'Thou shalt not commit adultery': But I say unto you, That
whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery
with her already in his heart." - Jesus
in "tough love",
Ah, so I'M the one tricking males into looking lustfully at hot young
chickie-poos?
If so, I seem to be having a 95-plus precent success rate.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
11 Apr 2006 03:17:13 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:29:59 -0500, Cary Kittrell wrote
(in article <e1e4mn$9dc$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>):
In article <4aog325halv75d167hvs7j45md8eurd9q7@4ax.com> Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
{...}
Yes it is. Cary offends everyone by not only despising the Word of God
found in the Holy Bible, but also by deception trying to trick folks
out of their Constitutional rights.
You see, leftists hate the FREEDOM of anything. But they pretend to be
nice guys by promoting the freedom to sin, and not telling anyone that
sinners become slaves (and therefore not FREE).
John 8:34 "Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin
is the servant of sin." - Jesus
Example:
Once you commit adultry, it's easier to do it again and again. Then
you become enslaved by sex.
Thus, Jesus came and made Levitical Law even tougher....
Matthew 5:27-28 "Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time,
'Thou shalt not commit adultery': But I say unto you, That
whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery
with her already in his heart." - Jesus
in "tough love",
Ah, so I'M the one tricking males into looking lustfully at hot young
chickie-poos?
Okay, I lust continually after The Anthropologist. So I've committed adultery
in my heart and intercourse in the bed?
This religious biz is /so/ confusing.
If so, I seem to be having a 95-plus precent success rate.
Ah! Not married, then?
++ gray
-- cary
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
11 Apr 2006 10:45:09 AM |
|
|
In article <0001HW.C060D039000807BFF0284530@news.giganews.com> writes:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:29:59 -0500, Cary Kittrell wrote
(in article <e1e4mn$9dc$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>):
In article <4aog325halv75d167hvs7j45md8eurd9q7@4ax.com> Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
{...}
Yes it is. Cary offends everyone by not only despising the Word of God
found in the Holy Bible, but also by deception trying to trick folks
out of their Constitutional rights.
You see, leftists hate the FREEDOM of anything. But they pretend to be
nice guys by promoting the freedom to sin, and not telling anyone that
sinners become slaves (and therefore not FREE).
John 8:34 "Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin
is the servant of sin." - Jesus
Example:
Once you commit adultry, it's easier to do it again and again. Then
you become enslaved by sex.
Thus, Jesus came and made Levitical Law even tougher....
Matthew 5:27-28 "Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time,
'Thou shalt not commit adultery': But I say unto you, That
whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery
with her already in his heart." - Jesus
in "tough love",
Ah, so I'M the one tricking males into looking lustfully at hot young
chickie-poos?
Okay, I lust continually after The Anthropologist. So I've committed adultery
in my heart and intercourse in the bed?
This religious biz is /so/ confusing.
If so, I seem to be having a 95-plus precent success rate.
Ah! Not married, then?
What? Why do you want me to destroy a wonderful thing?
But actually, I had Secret Squirrel and company in mind when
I wrote that line.
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gray Shockley" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
07 Apr 2006 01:34:42 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 06:44:27 -0500, Midjis wrote
(in article <Xns979E8257DA401axrmxkertsjlpjivdf@216.196.109.145>):
Anno Domini wrote:
Fine. Ok. I've done my job by telling you it is against the Law of
God. The rest is up to you.
Good! Yes. You are correct. This is such a simple concept, yet so many
who think of themselves as preachers, pastors, and others of the like
either cannot grasp it or choose to ignore it. Yes, you are entitled to
tell me what your God wants of me. I would have no objection to you doing
so - I simply recognise it as a necessary part of your faith.
Where it crosses the line is when you start to take on God's own mantle -
where you try to dictate what He will do and what He will not, based on the
human-written words of a book as you interpret them. It is not your place
to speak God's mind, any more than it is your place to tell Cary that he
has offended me.
Almost. It actually isn't all up to you in
that the conviction of the Spirit of God comes into play within this
equation. However, that's not up to me but to God himself.
Indeed. I agree so strongly that I will say it myself: It is NOT up to
YOU, but to GOD HIMSELF.
sexist
.
|
|
|
| User: "Midjis" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
07 Apr 2006 02:05:16 PM |
|
|
Gray Shockley wrote:
Almost. It actually isn't all up to you in
that the conviction of the Spirit of God comes into play within this
equation. However, that's not up to me but to God himself.
Indeed. I agree so strongly that I will say it myself: It is NOT up
to YOU, but to GOD HIMSELF.
sexist
Nor is it my place to tell someone else what God they worship. If JD
worships a male God then that is his business.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Feminazi Cuntkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
04 Apr 2006 04:31:46 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 06:21:23 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Fine. Ok. If sodomy and lesbianism is ok with you... you shouldn't
mind atall or object if I were to tell a little white lie or two to
Bob and Cary who are trying to kill me and wipe my voice from the face
of the earth and the internet.
Those VILLAINS!!!!
FNC, why I oughta...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
06 Apr 2006 08:28:26 PM |
|
|
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 06:21:23 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Fine. Ok. If sodomy and lesbianism is ok with you... you shouldn't
mind atall or object if I were to tell a little white lie or two to
Bob and Cary who are trying to kill me and wipe my voice from the face
of the earth and the internet.
Those VILLAINS!!!!
FNC, why I oughta...
Outa what? Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
07 Apr 2006 10:20:36 AM |
|
|
In article <m8lb32lmnt8601895631iikgg4mclfrl3n@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 06:21:23 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Fine. Ok. If sodomy and lesbianism is ok with you... you shouldn't
mind atall or object if I were to tell a little white lie or two to
Bob and Cary who are trying to kill me and wipe my voice from the face
of the earth and the internet.
Those VILLAINS!!!!
FNC, why I oughta...
Outa what? Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Um, Bob? Is there something you need to tell me?
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Feminazi Cuntkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
07 Apr 2006 05:01:54 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:28:26 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 06:21:23 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Fine. Ok. If sodomy and lesbianism is ok with you... you shouldn't
mind atall or object if I were to tell a little white lie or two to
Bob and Cary who are trying to kill me and wipe my voice from the face
of the earth and the internet.
Those VILLAINS!!!!
FNC, why I oughta...
Outa what?
Decide if this is a deal-breaker or a deserving-of-more-sex thing.
Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Nah, I figure you'll take care of that yourself the next time
something needs to be sawed or nailed or stapled.
FNC, occupational hazards.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
08 Apr 2006 08:46:17 PM |
|
|
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:28:26 GMT, Anno Domini
ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Nah, I figure you'll take care of that yourself the next time
something needs to be sawed or nailed or stapled.
FNC, occupational hazards.
That really wasn't very nice.
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
10 Apr 2006 12:15:55 PM |
|
|
In article <9aog325ps8s64h0v44fjdmhme015i8ltfb@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:28:26 GMT, Anno Domini
ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Nah, I figure you'll take care of that yourself the next time
something needs to be sawed or nailed or stapled.
FNC, occupational hazards.
That really wasn't very nice.
Jd
Or complete, either.
She forgot "installing a new chain".
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Feminazi Cuntkins" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
09 Apr 2006 08:53:43 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:46:17 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:28:26 GMT, Anno Domini
ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Nah, I figure you'll take care of that yourself the next time
something needs to be sawed or nailed or stapled.
FNC, occupational hazards.
That really wasn't very nice.
I'll take that as an apology.
That said, the weather's warming up and many people are starting to
think about yard clean-up and various DIY projects around and about
the house. Many of these projects will involve tool use.
Please everyone, follow my example, and use these items carefully and
competently, without serious personal injury. This is generally not a
particularly difficult task, assuming a one has a grasp of basic life
skills.
FNC, timberrrrrrr!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Anno Domini" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
11 Apr 2006 09:00:32 PM |
|
|
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:46:17 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:28:26 GMT, Anno Domini
ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Nah, I figure you'll take care of that yourself the next time
something needs to be sawed or nailed or stapled.
FNC, occupational hazards.
That really wasn't very nice.
I'll take that as an apology.
That's because you're reading comprehesion is unAmerican.
In fact, I doubt if you've ever actually operated a chainsaw in Canada
because you are probably a pretender from France. Or from some other
place where they don't speak English.
Your verbs are usually in the wrong place.
turn out the lights the parties over,
Jd
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
12 Apr 2006 04:49:49 PM |
|
|
In article <njso32dvqikuka9j8frisl44oa3k3rtfoh@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:46:17 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:28:26 GMT, Anno Domini
ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Nah, I figure you'll take care of that yourself the next time
something needs to be sawed or nailed or stapled.
FNC, occupational hazards.
That really wasn't very nice.
I'll take that as an apology.
That's because you're reading comprehesion is unAmerican.
In fact, I doubt if you've ever actually operated a chainsaw in Canada
because you are probably a pretender from France.
She's a pretender from France? A porpoise to the throne?
That might well explain those voices you hear.
-- wc"fetch some fardels!"k
.
|
|
|
| User: "Cary Kittrell" |
|
| Title: Re: Separation of Christ and ... Everyone (atheist crusade at work) |
12 Apr 2006 04:55:56 PM |
|
|
In article <e1jslt$nhd$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu> (Cary Kittrell) writes:
In article <njso32dvqikuka9j8frisl44oa3k3rtfoh@4ax.com> Anno Domini <ZionsFire@att.net> writes:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 01:46:17 GMT, Anno Domini
<ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Feminazi Cuntkins wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 01:28:26 GMT, Anno Domini
ZionsFire@att.net>wrote:
Kill me for telling lies to you boyfriends?
Nah, I figure you'll take care of that yourself the next time
something needs to be sawed or nailed or stapled.
FNC, occupational hazards.
That really wasn't very nice.
I'll take that as an apology.
That's because you're reading comprehesion is unAmerican.
In fact, I doubt if you've ever actually operated a chainsaw in Canada
because you are probably a pretender from France.
She's a pretender from France? A porpoise to the throne?
That might well explain those voices you hear.
-- wc"fetch some fardels!"k
Oops! That should have been -- aptly enough -- "fetch some faggots!"
-- cary
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
