| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Zizek, Angry Man!" |
| Date: |
01 Sep 2006 10:06:35 PM |
| Object: |
Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President Bush's next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as those in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate that the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a purpose if not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City, Bush said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq is a joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he hurts
himself.
.
|
|
| User: "ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
01 Sep 2006 10:15:56 PM |
|
|
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President Bush's next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as those in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate that the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a purpose if not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City, Bush said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq is a joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zizek, Angry Man!" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
01 Sep 2006 11:54:28 PM |
|
|
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a purpose if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City, Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq is a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 09:47:35 AM |
|
|
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a purpose if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City, Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq is a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zizek, Angry Man!" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 12:43:42 PM |
|
|
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-0AAC92.10473502092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President
Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as
those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate
that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a purpose
if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City, Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the
rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq is
a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 12:58:12 PM |
|
|
In article <ipjKg.13940$%j7.1212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-0AAC92.10473502092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President
Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as
those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate
that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a purpose
if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City, Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the
rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq is
a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we have
a great economy. What more do you want?
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zizek, Angry Man!" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 01:46:29 PM |
|
|
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-BDC35B.13581202092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <ipjKg.13940$%j7.1212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-0AAC92.10473502092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that
have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President
Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as
those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate
that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a
purpose
if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City,
Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the
rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view
of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against
Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq
is
a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he
hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
.
|
|
|
| User: "2643 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 02:17:14 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:46:29 GMT, "Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net>
wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-BDC35B.13581202092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <ipjKg.13940$%j7.1212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-0AAC92.10473502092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that
have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President
Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as
those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate
that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a
purpose
if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City,
Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the
rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view
of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against
Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq
is
a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he
hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
--
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 05:24:52 PM |
|
|
In article <o4mjf29c4m3l9fdprpo96vopn4l9guu21u@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:46:29 GMT, "Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net>
wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-BDC35B.13581202092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <ipjKg.13940$%j7.1212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-0AAC92.10473502092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that
have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President
Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as
those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate
that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a
purpose
if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City,
Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the
rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view
of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against
Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq
is
a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he
hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's not
running for anything.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
.
|
|
|
| User: "2643 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 08:36:16 PM |
|
|
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:24:52 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <o4mjf29c4m3l9fdprpo96vopn4l9guu21u@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:46:29 GMT, "Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net>
wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-BDC35B.13581202092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <ipjKg.13940$%j7.1212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-0AAC92.10473502092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that
have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President
Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as
those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate
that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a
purpose
if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City,
Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the
rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view
of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against
Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq
is
a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he
hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
--
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 08:55:17 PM |
|
|
In article <1ackf2h4o8eql1lm937mvetfcbki50tus4@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:24:52 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <o4mjf29c4m3l9fdprpo96vopn4l9guu21u@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:46:29 GMT, "Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net>
wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-BDC35B.13581202092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <ipjKg.13940$%j7.1212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-0AAC92.10473502092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that
have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President
Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the
enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such
as
those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to
demonstrate
that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a
purpose
if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City,
Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share
"the
rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted
view
of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against
Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows.
Iraq
is
a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and
40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he
hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is
you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we
have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
Of course I didn't. But to be honest, many Conservatives had problems
with GW as well. But that doesn't mean GW is the epitome of the
Republican party. Al Gore on the other hand should have won his
election hands down with no questions at all. It should have been a
landslide, but, somewhere beyond the popularity of Clinton, he lost.
And to be honest, I don't remember any Republicans stating that Clinton
should resign simply over ratings, they did however state that he should
leave office over the Monica scandal.
Predicting elections using polls is like predicting the weather. It
changes day to day. In fact, after the last Presidential election, the
Dems were complaining that Kerry was the real winner since the exit
polls stated that the majority voted for him. The exit polls are
supposed to be the most accurate, but they failed Kerry this last
election. I don't take polls seriously because of they way they are
conducted. How can you conclude that the entire country is for this or
for that simply because you polled 100, 1000 or even 10,000 people?
There is really no scientific value to polls whatsoever.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
.
|
|
|
| User: "2643 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
03 Sep 2006 12:29:19 AM |
|
|
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 21:55:17 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <1ackf2h4o8eql1lm937mvetfcbki50tus4@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:24:52 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <o4mjf29c4m3l9fdprpo96vopn4l9guu21u@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 18:46:29 GMT, "Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net>
wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-BDC35B.13581202092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <ipjKg.13940$%j7.1212@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-0AAC92.10473502092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <888Kg.4797$tU.1085@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
"ray" <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote in message
news:xxxrayted-8BAE72.23155601092006@news.newsguy.com...
In article <%y6Kg.13827$%j7.8948@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net>,
"Zizek, Angry Man!" <gore@bush.net> wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that
have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President
Bush's
next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the
enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such
as
those
in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to
demonstrate
that
the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a
purpose
if
not
a common network.
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City,
Bush
said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share
"the
rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted
view
of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against
Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows.
Iraq
is
a
joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and
40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he
hurts
himself.
Sounds like he's hurting you more than anybody.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is
you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we
have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
Of course I didn't. But to be honest, many Conservatives had problems
with GW as well. But that doesn't mean GW is the epitome of the
Republican party.
Of COURSE he's the epitome of the GOP. Panders to the worst in
America: the greedheads, the haters, and the religious crazies. Has a
deep antipathy toward freedom and individual rights, leans strongly
toward a police state run by corporations and churches. GOP all the
way.
Al Gore on the other hand should have won his
election hands down with no questions at all. It should have been a
landslide, but, somewhere beyond the popularity of Clinton, he lost.
He DID win the election. You forgot that, didn't you?
And to be honest, I don't remember any Republicans stating that Clinton
should resign simply over ratings, they did however state that he should
leave office over the Monica scandal.
You don't remember the big push to name Newt as a kind of a
co-president? It fell apart after OKC, when Newt tried playing the
presidential role of comforter to the country and fell flat on his
face. Everyone knew whose job that was, and Clinton performed it
marvelously.
Predicting elections using polls is like predicting the weather. It
changes day to day. In fact, after the last Presidential election, the
Dems were complaining that Kerry was the real winner since the exit
polls stated that the majority voted for him. The exit polls are
supposed to be the most accurate, but they failed Kerry this last
election. I don't take polls seriously because of they way they are
conducted. How can you conclude that the entire country is for this or
for that simply because you polled 100, 1000 or even 10,000 people?
There is really no scientific value to polls whatsoever.
--
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
03 Sep 2006 10:04:44 AM |
|
|
In article <5spkf25dv4tivu29gnsk3bfflbson9sdal@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
<snip>
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is
you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we
have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
Of course I didn't. But to be honest, many Conservatives had problems
with GW as well. But that doesn't mean GW is the epitome of the
Republican party.
Of COURSE he's the epitome of the GOP. Panders to the worst in
America: the greedheads, the haters, and the religious crazies. Has a
deep antipathy toward freedom and individual rights, leans strongly
toward a police state run by corporations and churches. GOP all the
way.
My what an imagination. My rights have not once been violated nor am I
experiencing any loss of freedom. Now if you want to see haters,
perhaps you should try the website Moveon.org or get a DVD of the Mike
Moorecrap movie. Or, you can probably find plenty of websites that have
the anti-Bush crowd destroying businesses and attacking police officers
outside the Republican National Conference. For more humorous hatred,
you can watch these clowns march down the street with Hitler/Bush signs
or even get a copy of Ann Coulter being attacked on stage.
You see, GW never supported any of these people--the Democrats do.
By your comment, you must believe that Bush is the first politician to
side with his supporters. SURPRISE! He isn't. The Democrats did it
too and we are still paying the price.
Al Gore on the other hand should have won his
election hands down with no questions at all. It should have been a
landslide, but, somewhere beyond the popularity of Clinton, he lost.
He DID win the election. You forgot that, didn't you?
If he won, then he would be president and you would have nothing to
complain about.
<snip>
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
.
|
|
|
| User: "2643 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
03 Sep 2006 03:24:17 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:04:44 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <5spkf25dv4tivu29gnsk3bfflbson9sdal@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
<snip>
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It is
you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and we
have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
Of course I didn't. But to be honest, many Conservatives had problems
with GW as well. But that doesn't mean GW is the epitome of the
Republican party.
Of COURSE he's the epitome of the GOP. Panders to the worst in
America: the greedheads, the haters, and the religious crazies. Has a
deep antipathy toward freedom and individual rights, leans strongly
toward a police state run by corporations and churches. GOP all the
way.
My what an imagination. My rights have not once been violated nor am I
experiencing any loss of freedom.
You won't, until you need them. That's the way it works, chuckles.
Now if you want to see haters,
perhaps you should try the website Moveon.org or get a DVD of the Mike
Moorecrap movie.
I'm willing to bet you've never visited MoveOn, or seen any of Moore's
movies (note the plural; he has four movies out, plus a comedy with
Alan Alda), seen either of his TV shows, or read any of his books.
Or, you can probably find plenty of websites that have
the anti-Bush crowd destroying businesses and attacking police officers
outside the Republican National Conference. For more humorous hatred,
you can watch these clowns march down the street with Hitler/Bush signs
or even get a copy of Ann Coulter being attacked on stage.
Wow. You really drink DEEP from the koolaid, don't you?
You see, GW never supported any of these people--the Democrats do.
The Democrats supported Ann Coulter and the RNC, but Putsch doesn't?
Wow, is THAT ever gonna be news to the folks back home!
By your comment, you must believe that Bush is the first politician to
side with his supporters. SURPRISE! He isn't. The Democrats did it
too and we are still paying the price.
Putsch didn't side with his supporters? Well, I guess that might
explain his 36% approval rating...
Al Gore on the other hand should have won his
election hands down with no questions at all. It should have been a
landslide, but, somewhere beyond the popularity of Clinton, he lost.
He DID win the election. You forgot that, didn't you?
If he won, then he would be president and you would have nothing to
complain about.
<snip>
--
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
03 Sep 2006 04:21:00 PM |
|
|
In article <6k1mf2pf20c7kmfi5o221hivs8b1b5nmmf@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:04:44 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <5spkf25dv4tivu29gnsk3bfflbson9sdal@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
<snip>
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It
is
you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and
we
have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
Of course I didn't. But to be honest, many Conservatives had problems
with GW as well. But that doesn't mean GW is the epitome of the
Republican party.
Of COURSE he's the epitome of the GOP. Panders to the worst in
America: the greedheads, the haters, and the religious crazies. Has a
deep antipathy toward freedom and individual rights, leans strongly
toward a police state run by corporations and churches. GOP all the
way.
My what an imagination. My rights have not once been violated nor am I
experiencing any loss of freedom.
You won't, until you need them. That's the way it works, chuckles.
And just what "rights" are you talking about? Bush has been in office
for six years, the Republicans have controlled Congress for over 10. If
I didn't experience any loss of rights by now, it will probably never
happen.
Now if you want to see haters,
perhaps you should try the website Moveon.org or get a DVD of the Mike
Moorecrap movie.
I'm willing to bet you've never visited MoveOn, or seen any of Moore's
movies (note the plural; he has four movies out, plus a comedy with
Alan Alda), seen either of his TV shows, or read any of his books.
Well I did visit Moveon.org and what I saw was scary. As for Moorecrap
movies, I wouldn't waste a dime on one of them, but did see (and hear)
bits and parts of them. But Moore has no integrity which is why he's
being sued for 80 million dollars by a war veteran who was behind the
Iraq war and GW. Moore cut up a interview of his to make it look like
he was against Iraq and GW. Moore is about as honest as Dan Ratherlie.
Or, you can probably find plenty of websites that have
the anti-Bush crowd destroying businesses and attacking police officers
outside the Republican National Conference. For more humorous hatred,
you can watch these clowns march down the street with Hitler/Bush signs
or even get a copy of Ann Coulter being attacked on stage.
Wow. You really drink DEEP from the koolaid, don't you?
Nothing koolaid about it. It happened, it was on the news and you can't
refute that. Liberals are angry people. You don't see Republicans
causing this kind of trouble.
You see, GW never supported any of these people--the Democrats do.
The Democrats supported Ann Coulter and the RNC, but Putsch doesn't?
Wow, is THAT ever gonna be news to the folks back home!
I think you're confused. THE LIBERALS supported all of this hatred,
just check out some of the Blogs. They loved this stuff.
By your comment, you must believe that Bush is the first politician to
side with his supporters. SURPRISE! He isn't. The Democrats did it
too and we are still paying the price.
Putsch didn't side with his supporters? Well, I guess that might
explain his 36% approval rating...
You must learn to read slower. I said that Bush isn't the only
politician who stood behind his supporters. They all do, that's part of
politics.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
.
|
|
|
| User: "2643 Dead" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
03 Sep 2006 11:33:55 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:21:00 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <6k1mf2pf20c7kmfi5o221hivs8b1b5nmmf@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:04:44 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <5spkf25dv4tivu29gnsk3bfflbson9sdal@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
<snip>
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice. It
is
you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising and
we
have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
Of course I didn't. But to be honest, many Conservatives had problems
with GW as well. But that doesn't mean GW is the epitome of the
Republican party.
Of COURSE he's the epitome of the GOP. Panders to the worst in
America: the greedheads, the haters, and the religious crazies. Has a
deep antipathy toward freedom and individual rights, leans strongly
toward a police state run by corporations and churches. GOP all the
way.
My what an imagination. My rights have not once been violated nor am I
experiencing any loss of freedom.
You won't, until you need them. That's the way it works, chuckles.
And just what "rights" are you talking about? Bush has been in office
for six years, the Republicans have controlled Congress for over 10. If
I didn't experience any loss of rights by now, it will probably never
happen.
The rights that won't be there when you need them.
And don't think that just because you support the vicious little son
of a ***** that makes you safe.
Revolutions always eat their young.
Now if you want to see haters,
perhaps you should try the website Moveon.org or get a DVD of the Mike
Moorecrap movie.
I'm willing to bet you've never visited MoveOn, or seen any of Moore's
movies (note the plural; he has four movies out, plus a comedy with
Alan Alda), seen either of his TV shows, or read any of his books.
Well I did visit Moveon.org and what I saw was scary.
Horse *****, buddy. Pure-d horseshit.
As for Moorecrap
movies, I wouldn't waste a dime on one of them, but did see (and hear)
bits and parts of them.
Wow. An informed opinion!
I is suitable impressed!
But Moore has no integrity which is why he's
being sued for 80 million dollars by a war veteran who was behind the
Iraq war and GW. Moore cut up a interview of his to make it look like
he was against Iraq and GW. Moore is about as honest as Dan Ratherlie.
Any ***** can file a suit, and most will. Let's see if it even gets
to court. The guy signed a release form, you know.
Or, you can probably find plenty of websites that have
the anti-Bush crowd destroying businesses and attacking police officers
outside the Republican National Conference. For more humorous hatred,
you can watch these clowns march down the street with Hitler/Bush signs
or even get a copy of Ann Coulter being attacked on stage.
Wow. You really drink DEEP from the koolaid, don't you?
Nothing koolaid about it. It happened, it was on the news and you can't
refute that. Liberals are angry people. You don't see Republicans
causing this kind of trouble.
You see, GW never supported any of these people--the Democrats do.
The Democrats supported Ann Coulter and the RNC, but Putsch doesn't?
Wow, is THAT ever gonna be news to the folks back home!
I think you're confused. THE LIBERALS supported all of this hatred,
just check out some of the Blogs. They loved this stuff.
By your comment, you must believe that Bush is the first politician to
side with his supporters. SURPRISE! He isn't. The Democrats did it
too and we are still paying the price.
Putsch didn't side with his supporters? Well, I guess that might
explain his 36% approval rating...
You must learn to read slower. I said that Bush isn't the only
politician who stood behind his supporters. They all do, that's part of
politics.
--
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Zizek, Angry Man!" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
04 Sep 2006 11:52:42 AM |
|
|
"2643 Dead" <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote in message
news:a0bnf2tk5s6161f19e1hps9leq8php8use@4ax.com...
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:21:00 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <6k1mf2pf20c7kmfi5o221hivs8b1b5nmmf@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:04:44 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <5spkf25dv4tivu29gnsk3bfflbson9sdal@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
<snip>
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in
twice. It
is
you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with
emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising
and
we
have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox
News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's
not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton
sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and
let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
Of course I didn't. But to be honest, many Conservatives had
problems
with GW as well. But that doesn't mean GW is the epitome of the
Republican party.
Of COURSE he's the epitome of the GOP. Panders to the worst in
America: the greedheads, the haters, and the religious crazies. Has
a
deep antipathy toward freedom and individual rights, leans strongly
toward a police state run by corporations and churches. GOP all the
way.
My what an imagination. My rights have not once been violated nor am I
experiencing any loss of freedom.
You won't, until you need them. That's the way it works, chuckles.
And just what "rights" are you talking about? Bush has been in office
for six years, the Republicans have controlled Congress for over 10. If
I didn't experience any loss of rights by now, it will probably never
happen.
The rights that won't be there when you need them.
And don't think that just because you support the vicious little son
of a ***** that makes you safe.
Revolutions always eat their young.
Now if you want to see haters,
perhaps you should try the website Moveon.org or get a DVD of the Mike
Moorecrap movie.
I'm willing to bet you've never visited MoveOn, or seen any of Moore's
movies (note the plural; he has four movies out, plus a comedy with
Alan Alda), seen either of his TV shows, or read any of his books.
Well I did visit Moveon.org and what I saw was scary.
Horse *****, buddy. Pure-d horseshit.
As for Moorecrap
movies, I wouldn't waste a dime on one of them, but did see (and hear)
bits and parts of them.
Wow. An informed opinion!
I is suitable impressed!
But Moore has no integrity which is why he's
being sued for 80 million dollars by a war veteran who was behind the
Iraq war and GW. Moore cut up a interview of his to make it look like
he was against Iraq and GW. Moore is about as honest as Dan Ratherlie.
Any ***** can file a suit, and most will. Let's see if it even gets
to court. The guy signed a release form, you know.
Or, you can probably find plenty of websites that have
the anti-Bush crowd destroying businesses and attacking police officers
outside the Republican National Conference. For more humorous hatred,
you can watch these clowns march down the street with Hitler/Bush signs
or even get a copy of Ann Coulter being attacked on stage.
Wow. You really drink DEEP from the koolaid, don't you?
Nothing koolaid about it. It happened, it was on the news and you can't
refute that. Liberals are angry people. You don't see Republicans
causing this kind of trouble.
You see, GW never supported any of these people--the Democrats do.
The Democrats supported Ann Coulter and the RNC, but Putsch doesn't?
Wow, is THAT ever gonna be news to the folks back home!
I think you're confused. THE LIBERALS supported all of this hatred,
just check out some of the Blogs. They loved this stuff.
By your comment, you must believe that Bush is the first politician to
side with his supporters. SURPRISE! He isn't. The Democrats did it
too and we are still paying the price.
Putsch didn't side with his supporters? Well, I guess that might
explain his 36% approval rating...
You must learn to read slower. I said that Bush isn't the only
politician who stood behind his supporters. They all do, that's part of
politics.
--
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
If moveon.org scares him, wait until CondiRice gets nominated with JebBush.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ray" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
04 Sep 2006 12:14:15 PM |
|
|
In article <a0bnf2tk5s6161f19e1hps9leq8php8use@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:21:00 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <6k1mf2pf20c7kmfi5o221hivs8b1b5nmmf@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:04:44 -0400, ray <xxxrayted@aol.com> wrote:
In article <5spkf25dv4tivu29gnsk3bfflbson9sdal@4ax.com>,
2643 Dead <zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
<snip>
Brushboy has been hurting America for years.
America is fine with Bush, it's why we voted him in twice.
It
is
you
that is ailing.
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with
emotion--
You are naive.
How so? He was voted in twice, his opinion polls are rising
and
we
have
a great economy. What more do you want?
The real truth, not some tax-dodging fogey's opine at Fox News'.
Last time I looked, his polls had "risen" to 36% approval.
He rises much more like that, and we won't need to bury him.
46% is the last I heard. And don't worry about burying GW, he's
not
running for anything.
36%. Not that 46% would be anything to brag about. When Clinton
sank
that low in his first term, Pubs were saying he should resign and
let
New Gingrich take over.
GW isn't running for anything, but his party is. I bet you forgot
that.
Of course I didn't. But to be honest, many Conservatives had problems
with GW as well. But that doesn't mean GW is the epitome of the
Republican party.
Of COURSE he's the epitome of the GOP. Panders to the worst in
America: the greedheads, the haters, and the religious crazies. Has a
deep antipathy toward freedom and individual rights, leans strongly
toward a police state run by corporations and churches. GOP all the
way.
My what an imagination. My rights have not once been violated nor am I
experiencing any loss of freedom.
You won't, until you need them. That's the way it works, chuckles.
And just what "rights" are you talking about? Bush has been in office
for six years, the Republicans have controlled Congress for over 10. If
I didn't experience any loss of rights by now, it will probably never
happen.
The rights that won't be there when you need them.
And don't think that just because you support the vicious little son
of a ***** that makes you safe.
Revolutions always eat their young.
So do lies. So in other words, you can't provide me with these
so-called loss of rights.
Now if you want to see haters,
perhaps you should try the website Moveon.org or get a DVD of the Mike
Moorecrap movie.
I'm willing to bet you've never visited MoveOn, or seen any of Moore's
movies (note the plural; he has four movies out, plus a comedy with
Alan Alda), seen either of his TV shows, or read any of his books.
Well I did visit Moveon.org and what I saw was scary.
Horse *****, buddy. Pure-d horseshit.
Really? I guess you didn't see the one about how Bush is taxing our
children, did you?
As for Moorecrap
movies, I wouldn't waste a dime on one of them, but did see (and hear)
bits and parts of them.
Wow. An informed opinion!
I is suitable impressed!
But Moore has no integrity which is why he's
being sued for 80 million dollars by a war veteran who was behind the
Iraq war and GW. Moore cut up a interview of his to make it look like
he was against Iraq and GW. Moore is about as honest as Dan Ratherlie.
Any ***** can file a suit, and most will. Let's see if it even gets
to court. The guy signed a release form, you know.
How is he going to sign anything with his arms blown off? And yes, I
anxiously await the outcome of that suit. Even if the solder gets 1
million, it will show just how dishonest Moorecrap is. Not that the
liberal media will won't bury the story on page D8 somewhere. But even
with a release, defamation of character is still liable.
Or, you can probably find plenty of websites that have
the anti-Bush crowd destroying businesses and attacking police officers
outside the Republican National Conference. For more humorous hatred,
you can watch these clowns march down the street with Hitler/Bush signs
or even get a copy of Ann Coulter being attacked on stage.
Wow. You really drink DEEP from the koolaid, don't you?
Nothing koolaid about it. It happened, it was on the news and you can't
refute that. Liberals are angry people. You don't see Republicans
causing this kind of trouble.
You see, GW never supported any of these people--the Democrats do.
The Democrats supported Ann Coulter and the RNC, but Putsch doesn't?
Wow, is THAT ever gonna be news to the folks back home!
I think you're confused. THE LIBERALS supported all of this hatred,
just check out some of the Blogs. They loved this stuff.
By your comment, you must believe that Bush is the first politician to
side with his supporters. SURPRISE! He isn't. The Democrats did it
too and we are still paying the price.
Putsch didn't side with his supporters? Well, I guess that might
explain his 36% approval rating...
You must learn to read slower. I said that Bush isn't the only
politician who stood behind his supporters. They all do, that's part of
politics.
--
Putsch: leading America to asymetric warfare since 2001
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
--
--Conservatives deal with facts, liberals deal with emotion--
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "nevermore" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
03 Sep 2006 03:52:50 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 13:24:17 -0700, 2643 Dead
<zepp22112643@finestplanet.com> wrote:
I'm willing to bet you've never visited MoveOn, or seen any of Moore's
movies (note the plural; he has four movies out, plus a comedy with
<ROTFLMAO> I'm willing to bet that would be true of most of the
people of the country.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "otto" |
|
| Title: Re: Shrubya's Next "terrist" Speech |
02 Sep 2006 06:30:11 AM |
|
|
Zizek, Angry Man! wrote:
The White House is bringing representatives from countries that have
suffered terrorist attacks to populate the audience at President Bush's next
war-on-terror speech, to emphasize the global nature of the enemy.
Bush often ticks off a list of attacks from recent years, such as those in
London, Madrid, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, to demonstrate that the
world should be united against Islamic militants who share a purpose if not
a common network.
Will there be attendees from Lebanon or Fallujah?
Bush committed terrorism in both places (though no one
should infer that I am limiting Bush's terrorism to those
two locales).
Hey, just remembered we installed Ayad Allawi as
interim PM of Iraq a year after "Mission Accomplished".
This was a guy that, during the 90's, under the direction of the CIA,
blew up a school bus and set off a bomb in a cinema.
President Bush, Speaking before the UN General Assembly,
November 10, 2001:
"
For every regime that sponsors terror, there is a price to be paid.
And it will be paid. The allies of terror are equally guilty of
murder and equally accountable to justice.
....
We're asking for a comprehensive commitment to this fight. We must
unite in opposing all terrorists, not just some of them. In this
world there are good causes and bad causes, and we may disagree on
where the line is drawn. Yet, there is no such thing as a good
terrorist. No national aspiration, no remembered wrong can ever
justify the deliberate murder of the innocent. Any government that
rejects this principle, trying to pick and choose its terrorist
friends, will know the consequences.
"
Maybe some of the survivors of the school bus can be
found to attend Bush's speech, or if there were no survivors
maybe someone from the cinema Allawi bombed.
While refreshing my memory about Allawi, a Google search
came up with a piece from The Economist. The piece is from
February 2004, just three months before we vested Allawi with
the position of PM of Iraq (I include a second paragraph, beyond
the one about Allawi as it gives an interesting incite into
'democracy as power grab':
"
The councillors' nepotism rankles, too. Sons, nephews and cousins
abound in ministries and on committees. And there are growing signs of
authoritarianism. As before the war, senior officials honk furiously
through the traffic jams of Baghdad, their convoys bristling with gun
muzzles like hedgehogs. The chairman of the council's security
committee, Ayad Allawi, has begun creating a new version of the feared
secret police. Iraq may well need a counter-insurgency force, but Mr
Allawi's rivals accuse him of recruiting former torturers to man a new
apparatus of oppression.
Some council members are now calling for elections as soon as possible,
starting in the more stable north and south, including ten mainly Shia
provinces and three mainly Kurdish ones, but excluding the five
provinces of Baghdad and the "Sunni triangle" where violence is
concentrated. It may be that a proper democratic spirit animates such
calls. But, this being Iraq, there are those who see the councillors'
haste as a complex ruse to stymie any alternative to their own
continuation in office.
"
- The Economist, Feb 19th 2004
http://www.economist.com/research/backgrounders/displaystory.cfm?story_id=2442073
Oh yeah !! Ayad Allawi is said to have bombed, in the 90's,
an office of his rival, Ahmed Chalabi. Remember him? He
sat behind Mrs. "Don't Let Her Behind The Wheel" Bush
in the gallery during Bush's 2004 State of the Union Address.
So, will we see Ahmed Chalabi in the audience of Bush's next
war-on-terror speech as well?
otto
"Because of American leadership and resolve, the world is changing for
the better,"
....
"For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible and no one can
now doubt the word of America,"
- Bush, 2004 State of the Union Address
Speaking before an American Legion convention in Salt Lake City, Bush said
the global war against these terrorists - whom he said share "the rigid
conviction that free societies are a threat to their twisted view of
Islam" - is today's successor to last century's fights against Nazism,
fascism and communism.
BwaHaHaHaHaHaHa. When Bush speaks his nose grows and grows. Iraq is a joke
compared to what FDR's America went through in the 30's and 40's..
Give Bush a bottle of whiskey and send him on his way before he hurts
himself.
ca.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism,
talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
