"ArKLyte_" <ArkLyte_@Now.Net> wrote in message
news:gd7aa097ktp4h15bmqmpcarl8m4jho10ra@4ax.com...

http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html

SORRY, MR.. BERG. BUT YOU'RE OUT OF LINE

Well, well. I wondered how long the democrazis could hold off going

dad. Guess this answers that question.

In those immortal words from the McCarthy hearings in the '50s - "Sir,

no shame?".

5/14/04

Neal Boortz

There is just no imaginable way to understand the grief of Michael
Berg. His 26-year-old son was brutally murdered -- his head sawed off
-- by Islamic monsters, and the whole thing was videotaped and not
appears on the internet for all the world to see. Michael Berg is and
was against the war in Iraq, and, by all accounts, has never been a
fan of George Bush. Nick Berg, on the other hand, was a supporter of
George Bush and the war effort.

From the very time Nick Berg's body was found on a roadside in Iraq,
Michael Berg has been making statements blaming the Bush
administration for his son's fate. Now Michael Berg is telling the
world that his son "died for the sins of George Bush and Donald
Rumsfeld."

...

"ArKLyte_" <ArkLyte_@Now.Net> wrote in message
news:gd7aa097ktp4h15bmqmpcarl8m4jho10ra@4ax.com...

http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html

SORRY, MR.. BERG. BUT YOU'RE OUT OF LINE

Well, well. I wondered how long the democrazis could hold off going after the
dad. Guess this answers that question.

In those immortal words from the McCarthy hearings in the '50s - "Sir, have you
no shame?".

5/14/04

Neal Boortz

There is just no imaginable way to understand the grief of Michael
Berg. His 26-year-old son was brutally murdered -- his head sawed off
-- by Islamic monsters, and the whole thing was videotaped and not
appears on the internet for all the world to see. Michael Berg is and
was against the war in Iraq, and, by all accounts, has never been a
fan of George Bush. Nick Berg, on the other hand, was a supporter of
George Bush and the war effort.

From the very time Nick Berg's body was found on a roadside in Iraq,
Michael Berg has been making statements blaming the Bush
administration for his son's fate. Now Michael Berg is telling the
world that his son "died for the sins of George Bush and Donald
Rumsfeld."

...

All I know is he just lost his son. Maybe you dont have kids. I do.

I would
lash out at anyone or anything that I could in this instance and so would
most.

"ArKLyte_" <ArkLyte_@Now.Net> wrote in message
news:gd7aa097ktp4h15bmqmpcarl8m4jho10ra@4ax.com...

http://boortz.com/nuze/index.html

SORRY, MR.. BERG. BUT YOU'RE OUT OF LINE

5/14/04

Neal Boortz

There is just no imaginable way to understand the grief of Michael
Berg. His 26-year-old son was brutally murdered -- his head sawed off
-- by Islamic monsters, and the whole thing was videotaped and not
appears on the internet for all the world to see. Michael Berg is and
was against the war in Iraq, and, by all accounts, has never been a
fan of George Bush. Nick Berg, on the other hand, was a supporter of
George Bush and the war effort.

From the very time Nick Berg's body was found on a roadside in Iraq,
Michael Berg has been making statements blaming the Bush
administration for his son's fate. Now Michael Berg is telling the
world that his son "died for the sins of George Bush and Donald
Rumsfeld."

Sins? Does Michael Berg mean the sin of liberating over 10 million
Iraqis from the brutality of Saddam Hussein? Saddam had rape rooms. In
these rooms people weren't stripped naked and arranged in piles. They
were raped, they were electrocuted, and they were murdered .. and no
small number of them suffered deaths unlike that suffered by Nick
Berg. Or maybe Michael Berg is talking about the sin of making sure
that Saddam would never again use biological or chemical weapons
against his own people, Iranians or anyone else, and that he would
never succeed in his long-term goal of developing nuclear weapons.
Perhaps Berg is referring to the sin of making sure that Saddam is
never again capable of launching missiles into civilian areas Tel
Aviv.

Quite a sinful guy, this George Bush. He stepped in where much of the
rest of the world would not. He stepped in where the much-vaunted
United Nations would not. He removed one of history's bloodiest
dictators from power, and quite possibly saved the lives of untold
thousands of people -- maybe tens of thousands of Americans or
Israelis -- who were destined to become the victims of a terrorist
attack with weapons too horrible to imagine; weapons supplied by
Saddam Hussein.

After a decade of inaction by the United Nations ... which actually
par for the course for the United Nations ... and in the face of the
reluctance of our European "allies" to do anything (after all, they
were getting big bucks from Saddam), George Bush acted. After 9/11 he
was determined that no rogue nation, no nation that cooperated with
terrorists, was going to be permitted to produce chemical, biological
or nuclear weapons that could make their way into the hands of Islamic
Jihadists. A bold policy? You bet. And thank God we had a president
who was strong enough to take that stand.

Look ... there were only two ways to go here. Ignore Saddam, and let
him continue with whatever his plans were. Maybe he would behave. But,
again, maybe not. We would be taking that chance. We would be betting
the lives of tens of thousands of Americans on the idea that Saddam
wasn't going to proceed with his weapons plans, and wasn't going to
continue his flirtation and cooperation with terrorists. Or .. the
second choice .. we could remove the potential threat by removing
Saddam from power. The world community gave him every opportunity to
cooperate -- to play nice. He refused. Now he's gone. It took guts.
Bush had guts.

As for Michael Berg. The last time I checked, Mr. Berg, the evidence
was that your son traveled to Iraq on his one ... looking for work. He
wasn't drafted. He wasn't conscripted. He wasn't forced. He made the
decision, and unfortunately paid with his life. There are Islamic
terrorists throughout the world, Mr. Berg. Your son could have gone to
the Philippines instead of Iraq. Islamic terrorists have decapitated
Americans there, too. Would you have also blamed that on Bush and
Rumsfeld?

Wouldn't it be a travesty if Michael Berg were using the death of his
son as an excuse to assign blame to a president he hasn't liked from
the beginning? For now, we'll just chalk it up to grief. A few more
words out of Michael Berg and we're going to start thinking otherwise.


--
"The al Qaeda that killed my son didn't know what they were doing.
They killed their best friend" - Michael Berg

http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/05/14/iraq.berg/index.html