Tell Congress to protect Social Security



 Politics > Politics-USA > Tell Congress to protect Social Security

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "HHIssues"
Date: 23 Jan 2005 07:41:20 AM
Object: Tell Congress to protect Social Security
Dear friend:
George Bush and Republican leaders have made phasing out Social Security
through privatization and massive benefit cuts their top priority for 2005.
Members of Congress are choosing sides over the next couple of weeks.
We need to make sure they choose correctly now—before a massive
election-style campaign by George Bush and the Wall Street interests gets to
them including what might be a $100 million TV ad campaign.
MoveOn’s trying to gather 200,000 signatures to present to lawmakers when
they return after the inauguration. You can sign the petition now at:
http://www.moveon.org/socialsecurity/
Social Security is a complicated issue, but the basics are really pretty
simple:
° Social Security provides monthly benefits to some 44 million Americans who
are retired, disabled or the survivor of a deceased parent. It provides most of
the income for older Americans--some 64 percent of their support. It has lifted
generations of seniors out of poverty.
° Social Security is not in crisis. That is an outright lie perpetrated in
order to create the urgency for radical changes. Under conservative forecasts,
the long-term challenges in Social Security do not manifest themselves until
2042. Even then Social Security has 70 percent of needed funds. That shortfall
is smaller than the amount needed in 1983, the last time we overhauled Social
Security. George Bush's Social Security crisis-talk is an effort to create a
specter of doom -- just like the weapons of mass destruction claim in Iraq.
° Phasing out Social Security and replacing it with privatized accounts means
one thing: massive cuts in monthly benefits for everybody. Social Security
privatization requires diverting taxes used to pay current benefits into
privatized accounts invested in risky stocks. Without that money Social
Security benefits will inevitably be cut -- some proposals even cut benefits of
current retirees. These benefit cuts are inevitable, since diverting Social
Security money into privatized accounts means less money to pay current and
future benefits.
° Every serious privatization proposal raises the Social Security retirement
age to 70. That might be fine if you're a Washington special interest lobbyist
but it is incredibly unfair to blue-collar Americans with tough, physical jobs,
or for African Americans and Latinos with lower life expectancies.
° Privatization means gambling with your retirement security. There is
probably an appropriate place for a little stock market risk in retirement
planning -- but it isn't Social Security. Privatization exposes your entire
retirement portfolio to stock market risks -- and the risk that you'll outlive
any of your savings at retirement. You can't outlive your Social Security
benefit.
° So who does benefit? Wall Street. Giant financial services firms have been
salivating for decades over the prospect of taking over Social Security. Wall
Street would make billions of dollars in profit by managing the privatized
accounts -- money that would come directly from your benefits.
° Action is urgently needed today. President Bush and Republican leaders in
Congress are joining forces with the financial services industry for a major
campaign to convince the public there is a major crisis and pressure members of
Congress to vote for privatization. Action is needed now before it is too late.
Please sign MoveOn’s petition to protect Social Security at the link below.
http://www.moveon.org/socialsecurity/
Thanks for doing this.
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Pelosi vows to protect her cash cow - Social Security
Bush's Fatherland Security Dept. can't protect its own facilities from terrorists
[osama bin union]24-Hour Security Detail Hired to Protect Thomas Built Bus Worker's Family Against UAW Union Reprisal
Dept. Homeland Security: protect yourselves
"Operation Voter Security" Will Use Alpha Agressive Dogs To Protect Polling Places
Re: Which Dem Pres Candidate will protect marriage?
Bush Has Failed to Adequately Protect U.S. Against Another Terrorist Attack.
Shortages in protective eqipment to protect our troops and Bush insists on $tar War$
Bush has failed to protect our nation.
Re: Can Kerry protect America... NO!
WHY SHOULD WE TRUST BUSH TO PROTECT US IN THE FUTURE, WHEN HE HAS ALREADY FAILED TO PROTECT US TWO TIMES IN THE PAST?
how can Cheney be Pro-family, protect marriage, and stand for liberty, and the persuit of happiness at the same time ??
MoveOn moves to protect votes
Bush Refuses to Protect Our Border...Why?
US troops refused requests to protect explosives site
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER