| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"ArKLyte_" |
| Date: |
23 Jul 2004 01:04:54 AM |
| Object: |
Terrorists attempt *fresh* wave of US hijackings - MUST READ |
http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=842422004
Terrorists attempt fresh wave of US hijackings
Scotsman
July 23, 2004
JAMES HALL
Key points • Terrorists thought to have targeted at least two US
flights in dry-run attacks • 9/11 Commission warns attack worse than
Twin Towers 'probable' • Cameras caught 9/11 terrorists setting off
security alarms prior to hijacking
Key quote "Every expert with whom we spoke told us an attack of even
greater magnitude is now possible and even probable. We do not have
the luxury of time" - Tom Kean, chairman 9/11 commission
Story in full DEVASTATING new evidence has emerged that terrorists are
preparing another attack on the United States, with air marshals and
flight crews reporting a series of dry runs for attacks on aircraft in
mid-air.
At least two flights are thought to have been targeted so far by
groups of Middle Eastern men who appear to be forming a plan of
attack.
On one flight an air marshal reportedly broke into an onboard toilet
to find that a mirror had been removed and that a Middle Eastern man
was trying to break through a wall to the cockpit.
One air marshal told the Washington Times newspaper yesterday: "No
doubt these are dry runs for a terrorist attack."
The revelation came on the day a major US report into the 11 September
attacks warned that another attack was likely.
The commission recommended an overhaul of the country’s intelligence
services to prevent al-Qaeda launching more deadly plots against
America.
Warning that an attack "of even greater magnitude" than the one that
killed almost 3,000 people in 2001 was "probable", the commission
accused the Clinton and Bush administrations of failing to have
sufficient imagination to have envisaged al-Qaeda’s lethal plot.
Tom Kean, the chairman of the commission, said: "Every expert with
whom we spoke told us an attack of even greater magnitude is now
possible and even probable. We do not have the luxury of time.
"We must prepare and we must act. The al-Qaeda network and its
affiliates are sophisticated, patient, disciplined and lethal."
Airline staff and passengers have catalogued repeated incidents that
suggest new attacks are in preparation.
"It’s happening and it’s a sad state of affairs," one pilot said.
On one flight last month, 14 Syrian men on a flight between Detroit
and Los Angeles boarded the flight, sitting apart. They pretended to
be strangers, according to those on board, but once airborne they
started filing in and out of the plane’s toilets. When the plane was
about to land, the men shot up to different toilets, arousing the
suspicions of air crew, passengers and air marshals.
However, air marshals who monitored the incident said there was no
"legal basis on which to take enforcement action".
In another incident, the Washington Times revealed, a flight attendant
reported a passenger using a long lens to take photographs of the
cockpit door.
Earlier this year, it was revealed that Islamic militants had found a
new way to circumvent security systems at airports. Instead of trying
to take bombs onto aircraft, they would place the components on board,
which they can then assemble in mid-flight.
Security sources told newspapers that the tactic had already been
tried out, again in dry-run form, on flights between the Middle East,
North Africa and western Europe.
As early as November, the FBI was warning that "terrorists are
considering the use of improvised explosive devices assembled on board
to hijack an aircraft".
Security agencies around the globe are now trying to track down the
militants that have been trained to carry out such attacks.
The activities are a terrifying echo of the meticulous planning of the
hijackers involved in the 11 September plot, which was comprehensively
detailed in yesterday’s report by the National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks Upon the United States
The 567-page final report issued by the ten-member commission pointed
to "deep institutional failings" and missed opportunities to thwart
the hijackings carried out by al-Qaeda operatives.
"Terrorism was not the overriding national-security concern for the US
government under either the Clinton or the pre-9/11 Bush
administrations," the report said.
It said that on at least nine occasions, chances were missed that
might have led to the uncovering of the plot.
Overnight, US television networks broadcast a newly released
surveillance video from Washington’s Dulles International Airport on
the morning of the attacks that investigators view as one of the
missed opportunities.
The video shows five hijackers passing through security checkpoints.
Four of them repeatedly set off alarms but were quickly cleared to
board the flight that later crashed into the Pentagon. It was not
clear what set the alarms off.
The commission was sweeping in its recommendations for change.
It proposed the appointment of a national intelligence director and
the creation of a national counter-terrorism centre to better
co-ordinate and share information about future terrorist threats.
"The national intelligence director should oversee national
intelligence centres to provide all-source analysis and plan
intelligence operations for the whole government on major problems,"
the report said.
The commission also said the US government must do more domestically
to guard against future terrorist attacks, including measures such as
setting national standards for issuing drivers’ licences and other
identification, improving "no-fly" and other terrorist-watch lists and
using more biometric identifiers to screen travellers at ports and
borders.
Other recommendations included declassifying intelligence spending,
upgrading the computer technology used by US intelligence and
reorganising congressional oversight.
Given new warnings about al-Qaeda’s desire to strike again on a mass
scale, James Thompson, commission member, said all US leaders would be
wise to take the commission’s findings to heart.
"If it happens and we haven’t moved, then the American people are
entitled to make very fundamental judgments about that," he said.
The commission’s vice-chairman, Lee Hamilton, a former Democratic
congressman, appealed for political unity at the heights of America’s
power. A "shift in mindset and organisation" within the US
intelligence apparatus and a smoother transition between presidencies
were also necessary, he said, to ensure "that this nation does not
lower its guard every four or eight years".
"The US government has access to vast amounts of information but it
has a weak process, a weak system of processing and using that
information," Mr Hamilton said. "Need to share must replace need to
know."
However, it will be months if not years before such recommendations
can be implemented. Yet many terrorism experts fear that al-Qaeda is
planning a terrorist attack in the next four months, in the run-up to
the November presidential elections.
"They [the 11 September hijackers] penetrated the defences of the most
powerful nation in the world," Mr Kean said. "They inflicted
unbearable trauma on our people, and at the same time they turned
international order upsidedown."
Mr Kean said the US was "faced with one of the greatest security
challenges in our long history".
===========================================================
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
.
|
|
| User: "Frankie Lee" |
|
| Title: Re: Terrorists attempt *fresh* wave of US hijackings - MUST READ |
23 Jul 2004 04:13:40 AM |
|
|
9/11 Commission are really incompetence.
They themselves are the Institutionalised Failures to begin with.
With the major developments that USA is now undertaking to fight the War on
Terror,and huge resources and funds and manpower and many countries are
rallied to root out terrorists today,so that another major events something
like 9/11 would not occur again....YOU SAW A COMPLETE NUMBNESS TO THE
REALITY OF AMERICANS.
Bush admin is now trying to prevent another 9/11;and you have traitors in
the states,giving aid to the enemy,sleeping with the enemy,hurting US
interest;and you allowed Micheal Moore and those nuts to to slander the
noble efforts of those who tried to prevent another 9/11,then in itself the
9/11 commission is a hypocritical Commission set out to please the
Terrorists,could not stand up for National Interest,and right before the
face of irratic questioning of reporters about Micheal Moore,and Iraq and Al
Qaeda's connections,those softening replies,and those lack of zeal
replies,it will show how the Commission fails ,and true to their
prophecies,a sheer waste of time.
The Commissions could not distinguish itself with rights and wrongs,how on
earth are their recommendation be ever accepted?
The deep failings of Institutionalised beauraucratics,are now in the display
within the Commissions itself.
Look at the CNN,the BBC icons in the news that read>>>no connections of Iraq
and Al Qaeda in the Commission findings...What on Earth are all these Nuts
so sure that there is no connection Iraq and Alqaeda?Aren't those words not
shoot out from Terrorits themselves to defend that they are not in Ties with
AlQaedas?
Despiet the fact that the Commission found relationship and the deep
worrying trend that Alqaeda and Iraq had had in the past,the embolden words
repeat again and again...NO CONNECTION IRAQ AND ALQAEDA.
With all these nuts questionings and barking at the wrong Trees,as noted by
the Commissions,for years reporters took no serious views on Terrorists,as
they do now.Evene more so,a haven is created for Terrorists,embolden their
efforts,the News net works inadvertently aids them,by airing their
Threats,spoke on their behalf...even the Terrorists who rape and murder
Americans are giving so much funds and food and shelter and even the best
Attorneys are there to help them for human rights..the Guantanamo Bay
prisoners.No wonder USA is encouraging another attacks on US soils,and
despite the outstanding efforts of Bush admin in war on Terrors and great
wisdom so far in preventing another 9/11,there was no recognition by the
9/11 commission at all.What a joke!
The Patriot Acts that is so wonderfully in place,and it works
marvellously,yet 9/11 Nuts inadvertently left out the major thing,and went
to insignificance matters again.What Institutionalise Failures!
Save yourself 9/11 commissions.What has been a very simple matters is now
being complicated by Intellectual Nuts.
"ArKLyte_" <ArkLyte_@Now.Net> wrote in message
news:e2b1g0p5r8a8d1km8bslpii9oai9dm9e83@4ax.com...
http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=842422004
Terrorists attempt fresh wave of US hijackings
Scotsman
July 23, 2004
JAMES HALL
Key points . Terrorists thought to have targeted at least two US
flights in dry-run attacks . 9/11 Commission warns attack worse than
Twin Towers 'probable' . Cameras caught 9/11 terrorists setting off
security alarms prior to hijacking
Key quote "Every expert with whom we spoke told us an attack of even
greater magnitude is now possible and even probable. We do not have
the luxury of time" - Tom Kean, chairman 9/11 commission
Story in full DEVASTATING new evidence has emerged that terrorists are
preparing another attack on the United States, with air marshals and
flight crews reporting a series of dry runs for attacks on aircraft in
mid-air.
At least two flights are thought to have been targeted so far by
groups of Middle Eastern men who appear to be forming a plan of
attack.
On one flight an air marshal reportedly broke into an onboard toilet
to find that a mirror had been removed and that a Middle Eastern man
was trying to break through a wall to the cockpit.
One air marshal told the Washington Times newspaper yesterday: "No
doubt these are dry runs for a terrorist attack."
The revelation came on the day a major US report into the 11 September
attacks warned that another attack was likely.
The commission recommended an overhaul of the country's intelligence
services to prevent al-Qaeda launching more deadly plots against
America.
Warning that an attack "of even greater magnitude" than the one that
killed almost 3,000 people in 2001 was "probable", the commission
accused the Clinton and Bush administrations of failing to have
sufficient imagination to have envisaged al-Qaeda's lethal plot.
Tom Kean, the chairman of the commission, said: "Every expert with
whom we spoke told us an attack of even greater magnitude is now
possible and even probable. We do not have the luxury of time.
"We must prepare and we must act. The al-Qaeda network and its
affiliates are sophisticated, patient, disciplined and lethal."
Airline staff and passengers have catalogued repeated incidents that
suggest new attacks are in preparation.
"It's happening and it's a sad state of affairs," one pilot said.
On one flight last month, 14 Syrian men on a flight between Detroit
and Los Angeles boarded the flight, sitting apart. They pretended to
be strangers, according to those on board, but once airborne they
started filing in and out of the plane's toilets. When the plane was
about to land, the men shot up to different toilets, arousing the
suspicions of air crew, passengers and air marshals.
However, air marshals who monitored the incident said there was no
"legal basis on which to take enforcement action".
In another incident, the Washington Times revealed, a flight attendant
reported a passenger using a long lens to take photographs of the
cockpit door.
Earlier this year, it was revealed that Islamic militants had found a
new way to circumvent security systems at airports. Instead of trying
to take bombs onto aircraft, they would place the components on board,
which they can then assemble in mid-flight.
Security sources told newspapers that the tactic had already been
tried out, again in dry-run form, on flights between the Middle East,
North Africa and western Europe.
As early as November, the FBI was warning that "terrorists are
considering the use of improvised explosive devices assembled on board
to hijack an aircraft".
Security agencies around the globe are now trying to track down the
militants that have been trained to carry out such attacks.
The activities are a terrifying echo of the meticulous planning of the
hijackers involved in the 11 September plot, which was comprehensively
detailed in yesterday's report by the National Commission on Terrorist
Attacks Upon the United States
The 567-page final report issued by the ten-member commission pointed
to "deep institutional failings" and missed opportunities to thwart
the hijackings carried out by al-Qaeda operatives.
"Terrorism was not the overriding national-security concern for the US
government under either the Clinton or the pre-9/11 Bush
administrations," the report said.
It said that on at least nine occasions, chances were missed that
might have led to the uncovering of the plot.
Overnight, US television networks broadcast a newly released
surveillance video from Washington's Dulles International Airport on
the morning of the attacks that investigators view as one of the
missed opportunities.
The video shows five hijackers passing through security checkpoints.
Four of them repeatedly set off alarms but were quickly cleared to
board the flight that later crashed into the Pentagon. It was not
clear what set the alarms off.
The commission was sweeping in its recommendations for change.
It proposed the appointment of a national intelligence director and
the creation of a national counter-terrorism centre to better
co-ordinate and share information about future terrorist threats.
"The national intelligence director should oversee national
intelligence centres to provide all-source analysis and plan
intelligence operations for the whole government on major problems,"
the report said.
The commission also said the US government must do more domestically
to guard against future terrorist attacks, including measures such as
setting national standards for issuing drivers' licences and other
identification, improving "no-fly" and other terrorist-watch lists and
using more biometric identifiers to screen travellers at ports and
borders.
Other recommendations included declassifying intelligence spending,
upgrading the computer technology used by US intelligence and
reorganising congressional oversight.
Given new warnings about al-Qaeda's desire to strike again on a mass
scale, James Thompson, commission member, said all US leaders would be
wise to take the commission's findings to heart.
"If it happens and we haven't moved, then the American people are
entitled to make very fundamental judgments about that," he said.
The commission's vice-chairman, Lee Hamilton, a former Democratic
congressman, appealed for political unity at the heights of America's
power. A "shift in mindset and organisation" within the US
intelligence apparatus and a smoother transition between presidencies
were also necessary, he said, to ensure "that this nation does not
lower its guard every four or eight years".
"The US government has access to vast amounts of information but it
has a weak process, a weak system of processing and using that
information," Mr Hamilton said. "Need to share must replace need to
know."
However, it will be months if not years before such recommendations
can be implemented. Yet many terrorism experts fear that al-Qaeda is
planning a terrorist attack in the next four months, in the run-up to
the November presidential elections.
"They [the 11 September hijackers] penetrated the defences of the most
powerful nation in the world," Mr Kean said. "They inflicted
unbearable trauma on our people, and at the same time they turned
international order upsidedown."
Mr Kean said the US was "faced with one of the greatest security
challenges in our long history".
===========================================================
"Ah yes, we must mollify angry fanatics who seek our destruction
because otherwise .. they might get mad and seek our destruction."
- Ann Coulter 9/26/2002
.
|
|
|
| User: "rstuart" |
|
| Title: Re: Terrorists attempt *fresh* wave of US hijackings - MUST READ |
30 Jul 2004 06:33:32 AM |
|
|
Frankie, I take it you're no Democrat.
I just finished watching highlights of the Boston convention, just to hear
their spin. Fortunately, the TV is in the other room. I'm just glad I
broke my neck in a car accident not long ago and have more access to
narcotics than a Columbian and lots of valium for the neck spasms right now.
I even stockpiled on Mylanta extra strength, Imodium, and antinauseaunts.
I thought Clinton was a world class liar, but Kerry takes the cake when he
talks about being a better leader against Terrorism after I look at his
voting record. I guess he picked Edwards for his Dale Carnegie approach to
winning votes. But when I saw him shooting skeet to try and fool the 2nd
Ammendment supporters, I nearly busted a nut!
I just wish the Republicans would come out with a commercial saying we
aren't going to ask permission from the UN or the French before we go after
Terrorist thugs like Saddam Hussein. Anyone who believes the WMDs weren't
there is just plain stupid. Anyone with remote intelligence would know
those would be the first weapons Saddam would export to other countries to
prove to the world he didn't have them after the war build-up started.
Time will tell we were right all along. Hopefully, enough of the truth will
come to light before November.
"Frankie Lee" <s9641351@singnet.com.sg> wrote in message
news:cdr3mf$grt$1@mawar.singnet.com.sg...
9/11 Commission are really incompetence.
They themselves are the Institutionalised Failures to begin with.
With the major developments that USA is now undertaking to fight the War
on
Terror,and huge resources and funds and manpower and many countries are
rallied to root out terrorists today,so that another major events
something
like 9/11 would not occur again....YOU SAW A COMPLETE NUMBNESS TO THE
REALITY OF AMERICANS.
Bush admin is now trying to prevent another 9/11;and you have traitors in
the states,giving aid to the enemy,sleeping with the enemy,hurting US
interest;and you allowed Micheal Moore and those nuts to to slander the
noble efforts of those who tried to prevent another 9/11,then in itself
the
9/11 commission is a hypocritical Commission set out to please the
Terrorists,could not stand up for National Interest,and right before the
face of irratic questioning of reporters about Micheal Moore,and Iraq and
Al
Qaeda's connections,those softening replies,and those lack of zeal
replies,it will show how the Commission fails ,and true to their
prophecies,a sheer waste of time.
The Commissions could not distinguish itself with rights and wrongs,how on
earth are their recommendation be ever accepted?
The deep failings of Institutionalised beauraucratics,are now in the
display
within the Commissions itself.
Look at the CNN,the BBC icons in the news that read>>>no connections of
Iraq
and Al Qaeda in the Commission findings...What on Earth are all these Nuts
so sure that there is no connection Iraq and Alqaeda?Aren't those words
not
shoot out from Terrorits themselves to defend that they are not in Ties
with
AlQaedas?
Despiet the fact that the Commission found relationship and the deep
worrying trend that Alqaeda and Iraq had had in the past,the embolden
words
repeat again and again...NO CONNECTION IRAQ AND ALQAEDA.
With all these nuts questionings and barking at the wrong Trees,as noted
by
the Commissions,for years reporters took no serious views on Terrorists,as
they do now.Evene more so,a haven is created for Terrorists,embolden their
efforts,the News net works inadvertently aids them,by airing their
Threats,spoke on their behalf...even the Terrorists who rape and murder
Americans are giving so much funds and food and shelter and even the best
Attorneys are there to help them for human rights..the Guantanamo Bay
prisoners.No wonder USA is encouraging another attacks on US soils,and
despite the outstanding efforts of Bush admin in war on Terrors and great
wisdom so far in preventing another 9/11,there was no recognition by the
9/11 commission at all.What a joke!
The Patriot Acts that is so wonderfully in place,and it works
marvellously,yet 9/11 Nuts inadvertently left out the major thing,and went
to insignificance matters again.What Institutionalise Failures!
Save yourself 9/11 commissions.What has been a very simple matters is now
being complicated by Intellectual Nuts.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Henru! Rustic" |
|
| Title: Re: Terrorists attempt *fresh* wave of US hijackings - MUST READ |
23 Jul 2004 11:20:47 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:13:40 +0800, "Frankie Lee" <s9641351@singnet.com.sg>
blurted:
On one flight an air marshal reportedly broke into an onboard toilet
to find that a mirror had been removed and that a Middle Eastern man
was trying to break through a wall to the cockpit.
I would like to know what we did with this nutcase.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "L Smithson" |
|
| Title: Re: Terrorists attempt *fresh* wave of US hijackings - MUST READ |
23 Jul 2004 02:24:29 PM |
|
|
ArKLyte_ <ArkLyte_@Now.Net> wrote in message news:<e2b1g0p5r8a8d1km8bslpii9oai9dm9e83@4ax.com>...
http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=842422004
Terrorists attempt fresh wave of US hijackings
Scotsman
And if Bush and his parasitic foreign guided Junta of USA media endorsed
con-artist is lucky this this might just happen right before the elections.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mack North" |
|
| Title: Re: Terrorists attempt *fresh* wave of US hijackings - MUST READ |
23 Jul 2004 08:35:00 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:04:54 GMT, ArKLyte_ <ArkLyte_@Now.Net> wrote:
http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=842422004
Terrorists attempt fresh wave of US hijackings
Scotsman
Stop being such a girlie man.
---Mack
.
|
|
|
| User: "rstuart" |
|
| Title: More American Airplaine Hijackings? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT |
30 Jul 2004 06:50:05 AM |
|
|
I said after 9/11 that we have seen the last of Airplane Hijackings.
There is no way Americans will tolerate another hijacking. Todd Beamer put
an end to any of their hopes ever again. Once a group of American men know
something like another hijacking is going down in the airplane they are
riding in, they're not going to stand for it. Period. Any American who
knows he's probably going to die in a hijacking will stop at nothing to foil
their plot. There is no way American Passenger Jets will ever be used as
missles against high profile targets again.
Even most of the hijackers did not know the full scope of their plot. Only
the ring leaders knew they were going to die by plowing planes into
buildings. They were lied to as well.
We need to start thinking of where all the chemical and biological weapons
Saddam had went and follow that trail.
Any Democrats think Kerry has the right idea?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Aulds" |
|
| Title: Re: More American Airplaine Hijackings? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT |
30 Jul 2004 07:16:36 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:50:05 GMT, "rstuart" <rstuart@swfla.rr.com>
wrote:
Any Democrats think Kerry has the right idea?
I'm a Republican voter (for the past 28 years) but I will say this, I
KNOW the Bush Administration has the wrong idea. The administration
led us into the wrong war, against the wrong enemy, without examining
carefully the evidence they used to justify it, without listening to
the best military advice they were given, and without adequately
planning for the continency that they were wrong about the WMDs, the
Hussein/al Qaeda link and a nuclear development program.
In matters of national security and war, it is inexcusable to be so
completely wrong.
American voters (and I hope you ARE registered to vote) ... We
cannot permit these "leaders" to remain in office. We have no choice
at this point in time ... but don't yield to the cynicism that says
the choice is NOT OURS to make ... it is. Vote.
Charles
Alabama, USA
.
|
|
|
| User: "William Daffer" |
|
| Title: Re: More American Airplaine Hijackings? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT |
30 Jul 2004 09:05:21 AM |
|
|
Charles Aulds <caulds@hiwaayX.net> writes:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:50:05 GMT, "rstuart" <rstuart@swfla.rr.com>
wrote:
Any Democrats think Kerry has the right idea?
I leave this in, it bears repeating.
I'm a Republican voter (for the past 28 years) but I will say this, I
KNOW the Bush Administration has the wrong idea. The administration
led us into the wrong war, against the wrong enemy, without examining
carefully the evidence they used to justify it, without listening to
the best military advice they were given, and without adequately
planning for the continency that they were wrong about the WMDs, the
Hussein/al Qaeda link and a nuclear development program.
In matters of national security and war, it is inexcusable to be so
completely wrong.
American voters (and I hope you ARE registered to vote) ... We
cannot permit these "leaders" to remain in office. We have no choice
at this point in time ... but don't yield to the cynicism that says
the choice is NOT OURS to make ... it is. Vote.
Charles
Alabama, USA
Very well spoken.
whd
--
REPROBATION, n. In theology, the state of a luckless mortal
prenatally damned. The doctrine of reprobation was taught by Calvin,
whose joy in it was somewhat marred by the sad sincerity of his
conviction that although some are foredoomed to perdition, others are
predestined to salvation.
-- Ambrose Bierce: _The Devil's Dictionary_
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "rstuart" |
|
| Title: Re: More American Airplaine Hijackings? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT |
30 Jul 2004 07:29:35 AM |
|
|
Charles, I wish you knew one word what you were talking about. Obviously
you rely on the New York Times and Network News for your information. I
could embarrass you with paragraph after paragraph and link after link to
disprove EVERYTHING you said. I never thought anyone could be so stupid,
but I see there are plenty of people out there who take the Dem propaganda
and swallow it hook, line and sinker.
"Charles Aulds" <caulds@hiwaayX.net> wrote in message
news:dkekg01f4ki163ec27v6u2mfdr222qmhth@4ax.com...
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:50:05 GMT, "rstuart" <rstuart@swfla.rr.com>
wrote:
Any Democrats think Kerry has the right idea?
I'm a Republican voter (for the past 28 years) but I will say this, I
KNOW the Bush Administration has the wrong idea. The administration
led us into the wrong war, against the wrong enemy, without examining
carefully the evidence they used to justify it, without listening to
the best military advice they were given, and without adequately
planning for the continency that they were wrong about the WMDs, the
Hussein/al Qaeda link and a nuclear development program.
In matters of national security and war, it is inexcusable to be so
completely wrong.
American voters (and I hope you ARE registered to vote) ... We
cannot permit these "leaders" to remain in office. We have no choice
at this point in time ... but don't yield to the cynicism that says
the choice is NOT OURS to make ... it is. Vote.
Charles
Alabama, USA
.
|
|
|
| User: "William Daffer" |
|
| Title: Re: More American Airplaine Hijackings? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT |
30 Jul 2004 09:06:24 AM |
|
|
"rstuart" <rstuart@swfla.rr.com> writes:
Charles, I wish you knew one word what you were talking about. Obviously
you rely on the New York Times and Network News for your information. I
could embarrass you with paragraph after paragraph and link after link to
disprove EVERYTHING you said. I never thought anyone could be so stupid,
but I see there are plenty of people out there who take the Dem propaganda
and swallow it hook, line and sinker.
I'd like to see that evidence.
whd
--
LAP, n. One of the most important organs of the female system -- an
admirable provision of nature for the repose of infancy, but chiefly
useful in rural festivities to support plates of cold chicken and
heads of adult males. The male of our species has a rudimentary lap,
imperfectly developed and in no way contributing to the animal's
substantial welfare.
-- Ambrose Bierce: _The Devil's Dictionary_
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Charles Aulds" |
|
| Title: Re: More American Airplaine Hijackings? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT |
30 Jul 2004 08:05:56 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:29:35 GMT, "rstuart" <rstuart@swfla.rr.com>
wrote:
Charles, I wish you knew one word what you were talking about. Obviously
you rely on the New York Times and Network News for your information. I
could embarrass you with paragraph after paragraph and link after link to
disprove EVERYTHING you said. .
I do appreciate the offer, but that's ok ... you won't change my mind,
and I won't yours. It's time to let the ballot decide ... that's the
American way.
Unregistered voters: you can download the voter registration form from
the Federal Election Commission web site (Tambien disponible en
Español), fill it out and mail it in:
http://www.fec.gov/votregis/vr.htm
I'm sure all the readers of this newsgroup are probably registered to
vote, but maybe you know someone who is not?
Charles
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Malev" |
|
| Title: Re: More American Airplaine Hijackings? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT |
30 Jul 2004 09:00:48 AM |
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:29:35 GMT, "rstuart" <rstuart@swfla.rr.com> wrote:
Charles, I wish you knew one word what you were talking about. Obviously
you rely on the New York Times and Network News for your information. I
could embarrass you with paragraph after paragraph and link after link to
disprove EVERYTHING you said. I never thought anyone could be so stupid,
but I see there are plenty of people out there who take the Dem propaganda
and swallow it hook, line and sinker.
Unfortunately there are people like you who take the Republican propaganda
and swallow it hook, line and sinker.
Please don't top post, it's clueless like your unelected leader
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|