| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"fasgnadh" |
| Date: |
25 Sep 2003 12:49:47 AM |
| Object: |
TexIraqi poll: Worse off under Bush than Saddam. |
"Iraqi's are divided on whether the country is
worse or better off than before the US Invasion"
"47% said the country was worse off than before the invasion
and 33% said it was better off."
http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/cakewalk.html
http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/bodysearch.html
.
|
|
| User: "fasgnadh" |
|
| Title: Re: TexIraqi poll: Worse off under Bush than Saddam. |
25 Sep 2003 10:00:40 AM |
|
|
"tipper" <tipper007@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f72fd7b@news.alphalink.com.au...
"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bktvhk$skq$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au...
"Iraqi's are divided on whether the country is
worse or better off than before the US Invasion"
"47% said the country was worse off than before the invasion
and 33% said it was better off."
http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/cakewalk.html
http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/bodysearch.html
As usual, wrong.
Nope, as usual you rely on the spin placed, rather than the actual results;
"Two-thirds, 67 per cent, say they think that Iraq will be in better
condition
five years from now than it was before the US-led invasion.
Only 8 per cent say they think it will be worse off."
Your 'two thirds' refers to how they THINK they will be faring
in FIVE YEARS TIME (after the invaders have fucked off ;-)
Hope springs eternal, eh?
Whereas their CURRENT REALITY is bleaker;
"But they're not convinced that Iraq is better off now"
Oh dear, tripper, you really must reduce your intake of hallucinogens!
B^)
"- 47 per cent said the country is worse off than before the
invasion and 33 per cent said it is better off."
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_51942.asp
.
|
|
|
| User: "tipper" |
|
| Title: Re: TexIraqi poll: Worse off under Bush than Saddam. |
27 Sep 2003 09:06:42 AM |
|
|
"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bkuvqi$1ihq$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au...
"tipper" <tipper007@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f72fd7b@news.alphalink.com.au...
"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bktvhk$skq$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au...
"Iraqi's are divided on whether the country is
worse or better off than before the US Invasion"
"47% said the country was worse off than before the invasion
and 33% said it was better off."
http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/cakewalk.html
http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/bodysearch.html
As usual, wrong.
Nope, as usual you rely on the spin placed, rather than the actual
results;
"Two-thirds, 67 per cent, say they think that Iraq will be in better
condition
five years from now than it was before the US-led invasion.
Only 8 per cent say they think it will be worse off."
Your 'two thirds' refers to how they THINK they will be faring
in FIVE YEARS TIME (after the invaders have fucked off ;-)
Hope springs eternal, eh?
Whereas their CURRENT REALITY is bleaker;
"But they're not convinced that Iraq is better off now"
Oh dear, tripper, you really must reduce your intake of
hallucinogens!
B^)
"- 47 per cent said the country is worse off than before the
invasion and 33 per cent said it is better off."
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_51942.asp
Maybe they are a bunch of hysterical moaners like you.
Come to think of it, they used to love dictators just like you do.
What backing, did sadsack get?
100% IIRC
.
|
|
|
| User: "fasgnadh" |
|
| Title: Re: TexIraqi poll: Worse off under Bush than Saddam. |
27 Sep 2003 12:23:38 AM |
|
|
"tipper" <tipper007@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f750d5e@news.alphalink.com.au...
"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bkuvqi$1ihq$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au...
"tipper" <tipper007@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f72fd7b@news.alphalink.com.au...
"fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:bktvhk$skq$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au...
"Iraqi's are divided on whether the country is
worse or better off than before the US Invasion"
"47% said the country was worse off than before the invasion
and 33% said it was better off."
http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/cakewalk.html
http://www.geocities.com/mild_colonial_boy/bodysearch.html
As usual, wrong.
Nope, as usual you rely on the spin placed, rather than the actual
results;
"Two-thirds, 67 per cent, say they think that Iraq will be in better
condition
five years from now than it was before the US-led invasion.
Only 8 per cent say they think it will be worse off."
Your 'two thirds' refers to how they THINK they will be faring
in FIVE YEARS TIME (after the invaders have fucked off ;-)
Hope springs eternal, eh?
Whereas their CURRENT REALITY is bleaker;
"But they're not convinced that Iraq is better off now"
Oh dear, tripper, you really must reduce your intake of
hallucinogens! B^)
"- 47 per cent said the country is worse off than before the
invasion and 33 per cent said it is better off."
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_51942.asp
Maybe they are a bunch of hysterical moaners like you.
Nothing left from you but personal attacks?
The only suprise this time is that you are doing it yourself! B^D
Heres the triple bottom line;
You were happy to misquote them, then they were 'a survey'.
When their real opinions are presented, you slag them.
Once your spin was unspun, all you can do is mere abuse.
Come to think of it, they used to love dictators just like you do.
You are a feeble party hack, who lives by deception.
Last week you were primping and strutting, claiming that
it didn't matter that thousands were killed, and anarchy
unleashed, in an oil war of deception, because it got rid
if Saddam and 'liberated' Iraq (or at least it's resources! B^p )
Now the Iraqi's clear desire to be free leads you to abuse them.
You are like Bush, Blair and Howard, you have no coherent
position, just a box of smoke, mirrors and spin.
What backing, did sadsack get?
It's Sergeant Bilko, not sadsack, you have the wrong American
role model, and he got total control over the entire export/import
kickback take.
Subject: Sheepish Ship of Shame meets Sgt Bilko
Message-ID: <bl32gl$1dgp$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au>
100% IIRC
Yep, you can't even get a jolly jumbuk into TexIraq unless you
grease some corrupt USSA apparatchiks palm.. Just the way
tories like it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "El Bastardo" |
|
| Title: Re: TexIraqi poll: Worse off under Bush than Saddam. |
25 Sep 2003 12:59:45 AM |
|
|
G'day,
fasgnadh wrote:
"Iraqi's are divided on whether the country is worse or better off
than before the US Invasion"
"47% said the country was worse off than before the invasion and
33% said it was better off."
To be fair, the same poll (I assume) also mentions that:
"Most residents of Baghdad say that ousting Saddam Hussein was worth
the hardships they've endured since then, says a Gallup poll that
shows they are divided on whether the country is worse off or
better off than before the US invasion."
"Two-thirds, 67 per cent, say they think that Iraq will be in better
condition five years from now than it was before the US-led
invasion.Only 8 per cent say they think it will be worse off."
"But they're not convinced that Iraq is better off now - 47 per cent
said the country is worse off than before the invasion and 33 per
cent said it is better off."
Source: http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_51942.asp
-- Geoff
.
|
|
|
| User: "fasgnadh" |
|
| Title: Re: TexIraqi poll: Worse off under Bush than Saddam. |
25 Sep 2003 02:11:23 AM |
|
|
"El Bastardo" <ewww@dogwater.com> wrote in message
news:lvvcb.1626$U74.91018@news.optus.net.au...
G'day,
fasgnadh wrote:
"Iraqi's are divided on whether the country is worse or better off
than before the US Invasion"
"47% said the country was worse off than before the invasion and
33% said it was better off."
To be fair, the same poll (I assume) also mentions that:
Same poll, perhaps, but without the MSN spin:
"Most residents of Baghdad say that ousting Saddam Hussein was worth
the hardships they've endured since then, says a Gallup poll that
shows they are divided on whether the country is worse off or
better off than before the US invasion."
"Two-thirds, 67 per cent, say they think that Iraq will be in better
condition five years from now than it was before the US-led
invasion.Only 8 per cent say they think it will be worse off."
That's not a finding on the reality of their CURRENT situation, but
a HOPE for their future! If you compare that to their view of the
shitty condition they are in now, you will see they are HOPING
that in five years time the Americans will be gone! You left out this bit;
"In the five months since coalition forces defeated Saddam and his armies,
Iraq has faced continuing violence, electrical outages, job shortages and
civil unrest."
"But they're not convinced that Iraq is better off now -
How could they be. All human beings HOPE for the future
to be better, when the invaders leave, when the Iraqi's again control
their own destiny and oil, when the anarchy and chaos end;
47 per cent said the country is worse off than before the invasion
and 33 per cent said it is better off."
How can the Americans pretend they have improved the lot of Iraqi's
when clearly they have made it worse?
And now the Americans are buying stooges in a propoganda war to
manufacture TexIraqi 'opinion';
______
From: "fasgnadh" <fasgnadh@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.europe,aus.politics,can.politics,uk.politics.misc,us.politics,a
us.culture.true-blue
Subject: Fake religious leaders created by USA
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 23:37:23 +1000
Message-ID: <bkpi6n$ltn$1@arachne.labyrinth.net.au>
"Fake religious leaders created by USA"
- Reuters 23/9/2003
Settle down.. they are not referring to Jim and Tammy Bakker,
and all the other fundie televangelists that are part of the neo-con
right,
or about the Bare Faced Messiah, LRon Hubbard, founder of
American Corporate Satanism... no.. they are talking about
the USSA role in Making Mad Mullahs, not just ARMING them! B^D
"The CIA paid Mullahs and created fake Islamic religious
leaders to preach a moderate message and counter
anti-American sentiment in the Arab world after the
September 11 attacks, a new book said today."
BWAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA!
Then the USSA, it's lapdog media, and it's stooges, lackies and
mouthpieces, point to these fakes and say "See, these people like us!"
"They want us to be here, pillaging their assets and calling it
privatization"
....
"In Islam, as in many other religions, anyone can call himself
a religious leader," he said in the book.
"So, besides paying Mullahs, the CIA created fake Mullahs
- recruited agents who would proclaim themselves clerics
and take a more moderate position about nonbelievers."
"We are taking over radio stations and supporting clerics,"
a CIA source was quoted as saying. "It's back to propaganda.
We are creating moderate Muslims."
Kessler said the CIA also paid for Mullahs to issue fatwas,
or religious edicts, urging Iraqis not to resist American forces.
He did not specify the countries this took place in."
- Reuters
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/09/23/1064082975769.html?from=storyrh
s
Source: http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_51942.asp
-- Geoff
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark K" |
|
| Title: Re: TexIraqi poll: Worse off under Bush than Saddam. |
25 Sep 2003 01:33:53 AM |
|
|
"El Bastardo" <ewww@dogwater.com> wrote in message
news:lvvcb.1626$U74.91018@news.optus.net.au...
G'day,
"Iraqi's are divided on whether the country is worse or better off
than before the US Invasion"
"47% said the country was worse off than before the invasion and
33% said it was better off."
To be fair, the same poll (I assume) also mentions that:
"Most residents of Baghdad say that ousting Saddam Hussein was worth
the hardships they've endured since then, says a Gallup poll that
shows they are divided on whether the country is worse off or
better off than before the US invasion."
"Two-thirds, 67 per cent, say they think that Iraq will be in better
condition five years from now than it was before the US-led
invasion.Only 8 per cent say they think it will be worse off."
"But they're not convinced that Iraq is better off now - 47 per cent
said the country is worse off than before the invasion and 33 per
cent said it is better off."
Source: http://news.ninemsn.com.au/World/story_51942.asp
Does it matter what American people think,
if they are being continually brain-washed by a
Jewish-controlled media?
.
|
|
|
| User: "randum_proser" |
|
| Title: Re: TexIraqi poll: Worse off under Bush than Saddam. |
25 Sep 2003 07:31:06 AM |
|
|
"Mark K" <self@server.net> wrote in message
news:l%vcb.427103$Oz4.226182@rwcrnsc54...
Does it matter what American people think,
if they are being continually brain-washed by a
Jewish-controlled media?
*nauseated*
-
http://randomprose.journalspace.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
