| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"us" |
| Date: |
10 Jul 2007 12:15:32 PM |
| Object: |
The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
http://www.iamthewitness.com/New-about-Bollyn-9July2007.html
Why are we so concerned?
by Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith
July 9, 2007
Our previous messages on this issue:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Linda-Shelton-and-Bollyn.html
http://www.iamthewitness.com/July-2007-note-from-Hufschmid.html
A message from Christopher Bollyn was posted today, 9 July 2007 at
Bollyn's web site:
www.bollyn.com/index/
Since he claims to be alive and doing fine, why are Hufschmid and
Smith so concerned?
1) The Bollyns are still in hiding
Any family that is in hiding is going to cause concern. If the
family is safe, why are they hiding? Nobody remains in hiding for weeks if
they are safe, especially not when they have two young children. His hiding
is a sign that he does not feel safe. Since he does not feel safe, why
should we feel that everything is okay with him?
His children have not had a normal life ever since he began writing
about the September 11 attack, and living in fear is going to make it even
worse for them.
It's possible that his shocking experience with the corrupt Chicago
police, the corrupt Chicago court system, and the lack of support from the
American people has caused him to become overly afraid of the police and the
ordinary citizens. It's possible that as time goes on he will relax, but
until he comes forward and lets us know that his family is back to a
somewhat normal life, a lot of people are going to worry about them.
2) Our first contact with him was through other people
When we started to wonder about his safety, both Smith and Hufschmid
received e-mail messages from people that Bollyn is okay. Why didn't Bollyn
just contact one of us?
He knows that we are concerned about him, and we have been working
with him for many years. Why wouldn't he have the courtesy to let us know
directly that he is okay?
3) None of the truth seekers care
Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, the 9/11 "truth groups", and virtually
everybody else is completely ignoring the Bollyn issue. They would probably
respond that they don't see any problem; that the Bollyn family appears to
be safe and, therefore, there is no reason to worry. They might refer to us
as "conspiracy nuts", or "delusional paranoids".
However, their lack of concern could be interpreted as a deliberate
attempt to fool people into ignoring the issue. If people forget about
Bollyn, they may arrange for his family to be killed.
Perhaps he is still in hiding because he senses that the ADL or some
other group is still after him, in which case, he is not safe, and we are
justified in wondering about his safety.
Nila Sagadevan complained to us that we were wrong to suspect him as
a Zionist agent, but today 9 July 2007, he sent out a message to everybody
on his e-mail list that the Bollyns are safe:
I was recently informed, by a usually reliable source, that
Bollyn had been 'taken out' (because of his position re Israeli involvement
in the 9/11 attacks). I'm pleased to hear he is alive and well...
Bollyn and Family Safe and Well
Christopher Bollyn
via Rumor Mill News
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6833
What would Sagadevan do if he received a message that Osama bin
Laden is alive and well? Is this really a 9/11 investigator?
If you make the wrong decision about who to trust, you will promote
and assist your enemies.
4) There is no evidence yet that he is safe or alive
So far we have not spoken with any of the Bollyn family by
telephone. The only evidence that he is alive are a couple of e-mail
messages, and a couple of articles posted at his website.
However, an e-mail message from Christopher Bollyn does not mean
that he is safe or alive. As Eric Hufschmid mentioned here,
http://www.iamthewitness.com/July-2007-note-from-Hufschmid.html
more than a
thousand e-mail messages went out under his e-mail address during Sunday
night, but he never sent them. This is proof that somebody else can send
e-mail messages under somebody else's address. Therefore, somebody could be
sending e-mail messages using Christopher's e-mail address.
Christopher and his wife did not maintain their own websites.
Rather, they paid somebody to do it for them. If the webmaster were to
receive an article from Christopher, he might post it, but that doesn't mean
the article came from Christopher. We don't even know if their webmaster can
be trusted!
5) Helje Bollyn was also hated by the Zionists
Most people in America know Christopher Bollyn for his work in
exposing 9/11 and Zionism. However, many years before 9/11, his wife, Helje,
was trying to expose the sinking of the ship, the Estonia. Her web site is:
www.elaestonia.org/eng/index.php?module=lingid&link=161
The sinking of this ship is another strange crime that involves
Zionism. The point is that both Christopher and Helje have been targets of
the Zionist movement for many, many years.
6) Why is Linda Shelton behaving like a guard dog?
The level of anger in Shelton's email messages to people who ask
about the Bollyns makes it appear as if she is a guard dog that chases
everybody away from the Bollyns.
As Smith wrote here,
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Linda-Shelton-and-Bollyn.html
instead of understanding why we are concerned
about the Bollyns, she tried to frighten Smith with such remarks as:
I will strongly consider filing a suit against both of you for
defamation of character and ask the FBI to investigate your threats (through
your audience) against me personally...
What threats have we made towards her? How have we defamed her
character?
In another e-mail message she wrote:
I will be writing more on Rumor Mill News to inform the world
about corruption in Cook County and Illinois. Their web site is not the only
way that my information can be disseminated.
The Rumor Mill News website is not open to the public for posting.
You have to be accepted by the woman, Rayelan Allan, who runs it. Almost
everybody on that site posts Zionist propaganda under pseudonyms.
Christopher Bollyn posts with his real name because he believes it's full of
Zionist agents, and he wants them to read his articles. Which articles has
Linda Shelton posted on that site? Has she posted anything under Christopher
Bollyn's name?
7) Other people seem to be missing, also
Daryl Smith has tried to talk with Peter Kawaja and Carol Valentine,
but Peter Kawaja behaves in a very strange manner, and Carol Valentine is
supposedly in hiding. Why should we believe she is in hiding? Both of them
may have been murdered, and somebody else may be answering their e-mail
messages, as mentioned here:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Hufschmid-30June2007.html
8) Why would Linda Shelton want to help with a pro-Goy, anti-Zionist?
Linda Shelton says that she does "not agree with all of his
writings":
www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=105561
What exactly does she disagree with? She argued with Hufschmid on
the phone that Zionists are not responsible for 9/11, and she told him a sad
story about how she knows many people who died in the Holocaust. She also
insisted that Apollo astronauts landed on the moon. Why is she "helping"
Christopher Bollyn, who has opposite attitudes?
Conclusion
When people that the Zionists hate as much as Christopher and Helje
Bollyn disappear in a strange manner and remain in hiding for many weeks, we
have a legitimate reason to question their safety.
The Chicago police should investigate the people who arranged for
Christopher's arrest, and they should drop all charges so that Christopher
has no reason to worry about the police. His only concern should be the
Zionists assassins, as it was in the "good old days", before his illegal
arrest.
We will not rest unless and until one of us has direct verbal
communication with either Christopher or Helje.
.
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
10 Jul 2007 12:46:11 PM |
|
|
us wrote:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/New-about-Bollyn-9July2007.html
Why are we so concerned?
by Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith
July 9, 2007
Our previous messages on this issue:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Linda-Shelton-and-Bollyn.html
http://www.iamthewitness.com/July-2007-note-from-Hufschmid.html
A message from Christopher Bollyn was posted today, 9 July
2007 at
Bollyn's web site:
www.bollyn.com/index/
Since he claims to be alive and doing fine, why are Hufschmid and
Smith so concerned?
Because everything's a conspiracy to them.
1) The Bollyns are still in hiding
Any family that is in hiding is going to cause concern. If the
family is safe, why are they hiding?
Because he doesn't want to face the punishment for his criminal conviction.
Nobody remains in hiding for weeks if
they are safe, especially not when they have two young children. His
hiding
is a sign that he does not feel safe. Since he does not feel safe, why
should we feel that everything is okay with him?
His children have not had a normal life ever since he began
writing
about the September 11 attack, and living in fear is going to make it
even
worse for them.
No one's fault but their father's.
It's possible that his shocking experience with the corrupt
Chicago
police, the corrupt Chicago court system, and the lack of support
from the
American people has caused him to become overly afraid of the police
and the
ordinary citizens.
Have you considered his paranoid delusions as a possible cause?
It's possible that as time goes on he will relax, but
until he comes forward and lets us know that his family is back to a
somewhat normal life, a lot of people are going to worry about them.
A lot of paranoid, deluded people.
2) Our first contact with him was through other people
When we started to wonder about his safety, both Smith and
Hufschmid
received e-mail messages from people that Bollyn is okay. Why didn't
Bollyn
just contact one of us?
He knows that we are concerned about him, and we have been
working
with him for many years. Why wouldn't he have the courtesy to let us know
directly that he is okay?
Because he's paranoid and delusional.
3) None of the truth seekers care
Pretty much nobody does.
Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, the 9/11 "truth groups", and
virtually
everybody else is completely ignoring the Bollyn issue. They would
probably
respond that they don't see any problem; that the Bollyn family
appears to
be safe and, therefore, there is no reason to worry. They might refer
to us
as "conspiracy nuts", or "delusional paranoids".
What a coincidence.
However, their lack of concern could be interpreted as a
deliberate
attempt to fool people into ignoring the issue. If people forget about
Bollyn, they may arrange for his family to be killed.
Thus demonstrating that you are "delusional paranoids".
Perhaps he is still in hiding because he senses that the ADL
or some
other group is still after him, in which case, he is not safe, and we are
justified in wondering about his safety.
Nila Sagadevan complained to us that we were wrong to suspect
him as
a Zionist agent, but today 9 July 2007, he sent out a message to
everybody
on his e-mail list that the Bollyns are safe:
I was recently informed, by a usually reliable source, that
Bollyn had been 'taken out' (because of his position re Israeli
involvement
in the 9/11 attacks). I'm pleased to hear he is alive and well...
Bollyn and Family Safe and Well
Christopher Bollyn
via Rumor Mill News
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6833
What would Sagadevan do if he received a message that Osama bin
Laden is alive and well? Is this really a 9/11 investigator?
If you make the wrong decision about who to trust, you will
promote
and assist your enemies.
4) There is no evidence yet that he is safe or alive
Yet with even less evidence, they don't hesitate to claim 7 of the 19
hijackers are still alive.
So far we have not spoken with any of the Bollyn family by
telephone. The only evidence that he is alive are a couple of e-mail
messages, and a couple of articles posted at his website.
However, an e-mail message from Christopher Bollyn does not mean
that he is safe or alive. As Eric Hufschmid mentioned here,
http://www.iamthewitness.com/July-2007-note-from-Hufschmid.html
more than a
thousand e-mail messages went out under his e-mail address during Sunday
night, but he never sent them. This is proof that somebody else can send
e-mail messages under somebody else's address. Therefore, somebody
could be
sending e-mail messages using Christopher's e-mail address.
Christopher and his wife did not maintain their own websites.
Rather, they paid somebody to do it for them. If the webmaster were to
receive an article from Christopher, he might post it, but that
doesn't mean
the article came from Christopher. We don't even know if their
webmaster can
be trusted!
Delusional paranoia.
5) Helje Bollyn was also hated by the Zionists
Most people in America know Christopher Bollyn for his work in
exposing 9/11 and Zionism.
Most people in America have never heard of him. Those who have heard of
him know him for his delusional paranoia concerning 9/11 and Zionism.
However, many years before 9/11, his wife, Helje,
was trying to expose the sinking of the ship, the Estonia. Her web
site is:
www.elaestonia.org/eng/index.php?module=lingid&link=161
The sinking of this ship is another strange crime that involves
Zionism. The point is that both Christopher and Helje have been
targets of
the Zionist movement for many, many years.
6) Why is Linda Shelton behaving like a guard dog?
The level of anger in Shelton's email messages to people who ask
about the Bollyns makes it appear as if she is a guard dog that chases
everybody away from the Bollyns.
As Smith wrote here,
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Linda-Shelton-and-Bollyn.html
instead of understanding why we are concerned
about the Bollyns, she tried to frighten Smith with such remarks as:
I will strongly consider filing a suit against both of you for
defamation of character and ask the FBI to investigate your threats
(through
your audience) against me personally...
What threats have we made towards her? How have we defamed her
character?
In another e-mail message she wrote:
I will be writing more on Rumor Mill News to inform the world
about corruption in Cook County and Illinois. Their web site is not
the only
way that my information can be disseminated.
The Rumor Mill News website is not open to the public for
posting.
You have to be accepted by the woman, Rayelan Allan, who runs it. Almost
everybody on that site posts Zionist propaganda under pseudonyms.
Christopher Bollyn posts with his real name because he believes it's
full of
Zionist agents, and he wants them to read his articles. Which
articles has
Linda Shelton posted on that site? Has she posted anything under
Christopher
Bollyn's name?
7) Other people seem to be missing, also
Daryl Smith has tried to talk with Peter Kawaja and Carol
Valentine,
but Peter Kawaja behaves in a very strange manner, and Carol Valentine is
supposedly in hiding. Why should we believe she is in hiding? Both of
them
may have been murdered, and somebody else may be answering their e-mail
messages, as mentioned here:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Hufschmid-30June2007.html
8) Why would Linda Shelton want to help with a pro-Goy,
anti-Zionist?
Linda Shelton says that she does "not agree with all of his
writings":
www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=105561
What exactly does she disagree with? She argued with Hufschmid on
the phone that Zionists are not responsible for 9/11, and she told
him a sad
story about how she knows many people who died in the Holocaust. She also
insisted that Apollo astronauts landed on the moon. Why is she "helping"
Christopher Bollyn, who has opposite attitudes?
Conclusion
When people that the Zionists hate as much as Christopher and Helje
Bollyn disappear in a strange manner and remain in hiding for many
weeks, we
have a legitimate reason to question their safety.
The Chicago police should investigate the people who arranged for
Christopher's arrest, and they should drop all charges so that
Christopher
has no reason to worry about the police. His only concern should be the
Zionists assassins, as it was in the "good old days", before his illegal
arrest.
We will not rest unless and until one of us has direct verbal
communication with either Christopher or Helje.
How do we know this was written by Hufschmid and Smith? THey could have
been murdered by the evil Zionists.
Paranoid, delusional dumbasses.
And stop redirecting followups, *****.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
11 Jul 2007 01:31:49 PM |
|
|
us wrote:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/New-about-Bollyn-9July2007.html
Why are we so concerned?
by Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith
July 9, 2007
Our previous messages on this issue:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Linda-Shelton-and-Bollyn.html
http://www.iamthewitness.com/July-2007-note-from-Hufschmid.html
It is absolutely clear that Christopher is a victim of political
persecution. All the flag-waving pseudo-patriots make me want to vomit
when I see them turn a bind eye to this kind of blatant violation of 1st
Amendment Rights.
A message from Christopher Bollyn was posted today, 9 July 2007 at
Bollyn's web site:
www.bollyn.com/index/
Since he claims to be alive and doing fine, why are Hufschmid and
Smith so concerned?
1) The Bollyns are still in hiding
Any family that is in hiding is going to cause concern. If the
family is safe, why are they hiding? Nobody remains in hiding for weeks if
they are safe, especially not when they have two young children. His
hiding is a sign that he does not feel safe. Since he does not feel safe,
why should we feel that everything is okay with him?
His children have not had a normal life ever since he began
writing
about the September 11 attack, and living in fear is going to make it even
worse for them.
It's possible that his shocking experience with the corrupt
Chicago
police, the corrupt Chicago court system, and the lack of support from the
American people has caused him to become overly afraid of the police and
the ordinary citizens. It's possible that as time goes on he will relax,
but until he comes forward and lets us know that his family is back to a
somewhat normal life, a lot of people are going to worry about them.
2) Our first contact with him was through other people
When we started to wonder about his safety, both Smith and
Hufschmid
received e-mail messages from people that Bollyn is okay. Why didn't
Bollyn just contact one of us?
He knows that we are concerned about him, and we have been working
with him for many years. Why wouldn't he have the courtesy to let us know
directly that he is okay?
3) None of the truth seekers care
Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, the 9/11 "truth groups", and
virtually
everybody else is completely ignoring the Bollyn issue. They would
probably respond that they don't see any problem; that the Bollyn family
appears to be safe and, therefore, there is no reason to worry. They might
refer to us as "conspiracy nuts", or "delusional paranoids".
However, their lack of concern could be interpreted as a
deliberate
attempt to fool people into ignoring the issue. If people forget about
Bollyn, they may arrange for his family to be killed.
Perhaps he is still in hiding because he senses that the ADL or
some
other group is still after him, in which case, he is not safe, and we are
justified in wondering about his safety.
Nila Sagadevan complained to us that we were wrong to suspect him
as
a Zionist agent, but today 9 July 2007, he sent out a message to everybody
on his e-mail list that the Bollyns are safe:
I was recently informed, by a usually reliable source, that
Bollyn had been 'taken out' (because of his position re Israeli
involvement in the 9/11 attacks). I'm pleased to hear he is alive and
well...
Bollyn and Family Safe and Well
Christopher Bollyn
via Rumor Mill News
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6833
What would Sagadevan do if he received a message that Osama bin
Laden is alive and well? Is this really a 9/11 investigator?
If you make the wrong decision about who to trust, you will
promote
and assist your enemies.
4) There is no evidence yet that he is safe or alive
So far we have not spoken with any of the Bollyn family by
telephone. The only evidence that he is alive are a couple of e-mail
messages, and a couple of articles posted at his website.
However, an e-mail message from Christopher Bollyn does not mean
that he is safe or alive. As Eric Hufschmid mentioned here,
http://www.iamthewitness.com/July-2007-note-from-Hufschmid.html
more than a
thousand e-mail messages went out under his e-mail address during Sunday
night, but he never sent them. This is proof that somebody else can send
e-mail messages under somebody else's address. Therefore, somebody could
be sending e-mail messages using Christopher's e-mail address.
Christopher and his wife did not maintain their own websites.
Rather, they paid somebody to do it for them. If the webmaster were to
receive an article from Christopher, he might post it, but that doesn't
mean the article came from Christopher. We don't even know if their
webmaster can be trusted!
5) Helje Bollyn was also hated by the Zionists
Most people in America know Christopher Bollyn for his work in
exposing 9/11 and Zionism. However, many years before 9/11, his wife,
Helje, was trying to expose the sinking of the ship, the Estonia. Her web
site is:
www.elaestonia.org/eng/index.php?module=lingid&link=161
The sinking of this ship is another strange crime that involves
Zionism. The point is that both Christopher and Helje have been targets of
the Zionist movement for many, many years.
6) Why is Linda Shelton behaving like a guard dog?
The level of anger in Shelton's email messages to people who ask
about the Bollyns makes it appear as if she is a guard dog that chases
everybody away from the Bollyns.
As Smith wrote here,
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Linda-Shelton-and-Bollyn.html
instead of understanding why we are concerned
about the Bollyns, she tried to frighten Smith with such remarks as:
I will strongly consider filing a suit against both of you for
defamation of character and ask the FBI to investigate your threats
(through your audience) against me personally...
What threats have we made towards her? How have we defamed her
character?
In another e-mail message she wrote:
I will be writing more on Rumor Mill News to inform the world
about corruption in Cook County and Illinois. Their web site is not the
only way that my information can be disseminated.
The Rumor Mill News website is not open to the public for posting.
You have to be accepted by the woman, Rayelan Allan, who runs it. Almost
everybody on that site posts Zionist propaganda under pseudonyms.
Christopher Bollyn posts with his real name because he believes it's full
of Zionist agents, and he wants them to read his articles. Which articles
has Linda Shelton posted on that site? Has she posted anything under
Christopher Bollyn's name?
7) Other people seem to be missing, also
Daryl Smith has tried to talk with Peter Kawaja and Carol
Valentine,
but Peter Kawaja behaves in a very strange manner, and Carol Valentine is
supposedly in hiding. Why should we believe she is in hiding? Both of them
may have been murdered, and somebody else may be answering their e-mail
messages, as mentioned here:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Hufschmid-30June2007.html
8) Why would Linda Shelton want to help with a pro-Goy,
anti-Zionist?
Linda Shelton says that she does "not agree with all of his
writings":
www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=105561
What exactly does she disagree with? She argued with Hufschmid on
the phone that Zionists are not responsible for 9/11, and she told him a
sad story about how she knows many people who died in the Holocaust. She
also insisted that Apollo astronauts landed on the moon. Why is she
"helping" Christopher Bollyn, who has opposite attitudes?
Conclusion
When people that the Zionists hate as much as Christopher and Helje
Bollyn disappear in a strange manner and remain in hiding for many weeks,
we have a legitimate reason to question their safety.
The Chicago police should investigate the people who arranged for
Christopher's arrest, and they should drop all charges so that Christopher
has no reason to worry about the police. His only concern should be the
Zionists assassins, as it was in the "good old days", before his illegal
arrest.
We will not rest unless and until one of us has direct verbal
communication with either Christopher or Helje.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P." |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
11 Jul 2007 10:21:55 PM |
|
|
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
It is absolutely clear that Christopher is a victim of political
persecution.
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is really
talking to him".
.
|
|
|
| User: "BDK" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
12 Jul 2007 12:20:30 PM |
|
|
In article <P4mdna-gm_HUAwjbnZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@comcast.com>,
JohnP_Da_Evil_Joo@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com says...
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
It is absolutely clear that Christopher is a victim of political
persecution.
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is really
talking to him".
You made me shoot tea out my nose with that one!
So what was his cereal saying to him?
BDK
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P." |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
12 Jul 2007 09:44:36 PM |
|
|
"BDK" <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote in a message
Sure, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
You made me shoot tea out my nose with that one!
So what was his cereal saying to him?
"Snap, Crackle, Pop a cap in those fascist pig cops who are watching your
every move and communicating with the aliens to conspire against you!"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
13 Jul 2007 04:19:56 AM |
|
|
John P. wrote:
"BDK" <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote in a message
Sure, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
You made me shoot tea out my nose with that one!
So what was his cereal saying to him?
"Snap, Crackle, Pop a cap in those fascist pig cops who are watching your
every move and communicating with the aliens to conspire against you!"
Christopher has not advocated any violence, nor even hostility toward law
enforcement other than those whom he believes (with good reason) to be
corrupt. There's a difference between John Ashcroft and Gary Caradori.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P." |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
14 Jul 2007 03:36:21 PM |
|
|
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
So what was his cereal saying to him?
"Snap, Crackle, Pop a cap in those fascist pig cops who are watching your
every move and communicating with the aliens to conspire against you!"
Christopher has not advocated any violence, nor even hostility toward law
enforcement other than those whom he believes (with good reason) to be
corrupt.
That's right Hatto, he hasn't. We're all lucky he has been able to resist
the message from his cereal.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
14 Jul 2007 06:36:55 PM |
|
|
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
So what was his cereal saying to him?
"Snap, Crackle, Pop a cap in those fascist pig cops who are watching
your every move and communicating with the aliens to conspire against
you!"
Christopher has not advocated any violence, nor even hostility toward law
enforcement other than those whom he believes (with good reason) to be
corrupt.
That's right Hatto, he hasn't. We're all lucky he has been able to resist
the message from his cereal.
What's it say? "Zapata, Zapruder, de Mohrenschildt, Lansky...Poppy was
there"?
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "BDK" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
13 Jul 2007 08:04:36 AM |
|
|
In article <cqedncLMJ50j3grbnZ2dnUVZ_q2pnZ2d@speakeasy.net>,
abbot@AugiaDives.hre says...
John P. wrote:
"BDK" <BDK@shillsrus.com> wrote in a message
Sure, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
You made me shoot tea out my nose with that one!
So what was his cereal saying to him?
"Snap, Crackle, Pop a cap in those fascist pig cops who are watching your
every move and communicating with the aliens to conspire against you!"
Christopher has not advocated any violence, nor even hostility toward law
enforcement other than those whom he believes (with good reason) to be
corrupt. There's a difference between John Ashcroft and Gary Caradori.
How about, "Snap, Crackle, Pop-Pop Christopher, it's the last sound you
will hear, as the CFR, ZOG, Bilderburger, CIA, and, of course, chemtrail
fueled lizardmen pump bullets into your crazed *****, then Larry
Silverstein, Henry Kissinger, and Michael Chertoff will pick them up and
disappear into the night!"
Oh the humanity! Henry's too damn old to drive at night!
BDK
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
12 Jul 2007 03:41:49 PM |
|
|
BDK wrote:
In article <P4mdna-gm_HUAwjbnZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@comcast.com>,
JohnP_Da_Evil_Joo@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com says...
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
It is absolutely clear that Christopher is a victim of political
persecution.
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is really
talking to him".
You made me shoot tea out my nose with that one!
So what was his cereal saying to him?
"Snap, Crackle, Illuminati lizard men are trying to enslave the world"
.
|
|
|
| User: "BDK" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
12 Jul 2007 09:21:02 PM |
|
|
In article <hmwli.11978$ya1.951@news02.roc.ny>,
says...
BDK wrote:
In article <P4mdna-gm_HUAwjbnZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@comcast.com>,
JohnP_Da_Evil_Joo@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com says...
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
It is absolutely clear that Christopher is a victim of political
persecution.
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is really
talking to him".
You made me shoot tea out my nose with that one!
So what was his cereal saying to him?
"Snap, Crackle, Illuminati lizard men are trying to enslave the world"
Nice.
BDK
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
12 Jul 2007 04:53:26 PM |
|
|
Vandar wrote:
BDK wrote:
In article <P4mdna-gm_HUAwjbnZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@comcast.com>,
JohnP_Da_Evil_Joo@WhyAreMoronsAttractedToMe.com says...
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
It is absolutely clear that Christopher is a victim of political
persecution.
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really talking to him".
You made me shoot tea out my nose with that one!
So what was his cereal saying to him?
"Snap, Crackle, Illuminati lizard men are trying to enslave the world"
"Yahiye Gadahn, Abu Suhayb Al-Amriki, Abu Suhayb, Yihya Majadin, Yayah"
perhaps?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBLrtmvpRUc&mode=related&search=
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
12 Jul 2007 12:49:39 AM |
|
|
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
It is absolutely clear that Christopher is a victim of political
persecution.
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is really
talking to him".
Uh, that is not what happened to Christopher. There seems to be no question
as to there being 3 heavily armed men in an unmarked car loitering around
his residence. He called 911 to have the situation checked out. The
egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements should
have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told it.
Christopher's only offense is speaking truth to power.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P." |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
12 Jul 2007 09:43:08 PM |
|
|
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
Uh, that is not what happened to Christopher. There seems to be no
question
as to there being 3 heavily armed men in an unmarked car loitering around
his residence.
Those are "Law Enforcement Officers" to people who aren't whacked out loons
who think everyone is out to get them.
He called 911 to have the situation checked out.
And was informed that they were law enforcement officers.
The egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements
should
have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told it.
Is that how you recall the incident as you witnessed it, or are you
imagining a 'truth' that fits with your beliefs?
Christopher's only offense is speaking truth to power.
.... and being a drunk, whacked out loon, unable to hold a normal
conversation with law enforcement officers asking him why he's acting like a
drunk whacked out loon.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
13 Jul 2007 04:12:22 AM |
|
|
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
Uh, that is not what happened to Christopher. There seems to be no
question
as to there being 3 heavily armed men in an unmarked car loitering around
his residence.
Those are "Law Enforcement Officers" to people who aren't whacked out
loons who think everyone is out to get them.
So he's not supposed to be concerned about 3 heavily armed "Law Enforcement
Officers" in an unmarked car loitering around his residence in a low crime
neighborhood.
He called 911 to have the situation checked out.
And was informed that they were law enforcement officers.
These guys have night sticks, side arms, pepper spray, armed backup, flack
jackets and handcuffs. Up against one unarmed man in sandals and a
Hawaiian shirt they found it necessary to taser him, after physically
restraining him?
The egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements
should
have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told it.
Is that how you recall the incident as you witnessed it, or are you
imagining a 'truth' that fits with your beliefs?
That's what was said at the trial.
Christopher's only offense is speaking truth to power.
... and being a drunk, whacked out loon, unable to hold a normal
conversation with law enforcement officers asking him why he's acting like
a drunk whacked out loon.
They never provided any evidence that he was drunk. Nor did they describe
any behavior indicative of drunkenness on his part.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P." |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
14 Jul 2007 03:40:48 PM |
|
|
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
Those are "Law Enforcement Officers" to people who aren't whacked out
loons who think everyone is out to get them.
So he's not supposed to be concerned about 3 heavily armed "Law
Enforcement
Officers" in an unmarked car loitering around his residence in a low crime
neighborhood.
Concerned? Sure, he can be concerned. Maybe the guy across the street or
next door to him is dealing drugs or making kiddie porn movies, or maybe
he's a wanted fugitive they've been attempting to track down.
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some cops in
your neighborhood.
He called 911 to have the situation checked out.
And was informed that they were law enforcement officers.
These guys have night sticks, side arms, pepper spray, armed backup, flack
jackets and handcuffs. Up against one unarmed man in sandals and a
Hawaiian shirt they found it necessary to taser him, after physically
restraining him?
When he started his drunken tirade, he wasn't up against" anything or
anyone.
The egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements
should have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told
it.
Is that how you recall the incident as you witnessed it, or are you
imagining a 'truth' that fits with your beliefs?
That's what was said at the trial.
Yeah, most criminals claim they didn't do anything. What's your point? You
have no clue what actually happened.
Christopher's only offense is speaking truth to power.
... and being a drunk, whacked out loon, unable to hold a normal
conversation with law enforcement officers asking him why he's acting
like
a drunk whacked out loon.
They never provided any evidence that he was drunk. Nor did they describe
any behavior indicative of drunkenness on his part.
That's right... he just went to the liquor store, on his bike, to use the
phone.
<wink>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
14 Jul 2007 05:50:37 PM |
|
|
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
Those are "Law Enforcement Officers" to people who aren't whacked out
loons who think everyone is out to get them.
So he's not supposed to be concerned about 3 heavily armed "Law
Enforcement
Officers" in an unmarked car loitering around his residence in a low
crime neighborhood.
Concerned? Sure, he can be concerned. Maybe the guy across the street or
next door to him is dealing drugs or making kiddie porn movies, or maybe
he's a wanted fugitive they've been attempting to track down.
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some cops
in your neighborhood.
Kind of like Bill Buford at Mt. Carmel, eh?
He called 911 to have the situation checked out.
And was informed that they were law enforcement officers.
These guys have night sticks, side arms, pepper spray, armed backup,
flack
jackets and handcuffs. Up against one unarmed man in sandals and a
Hawaiian shirt they found it necessary to taser him, after physically
restraining him?
When he started his drunken tirade, he wasn't up against" anything or
anyone.
Weaving fiction just as fast as you can,eh?
The egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements
should have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told
it.
Is that how you recall the incident as you witnessed it, or are you
imagining a 'truth' that fits with your beliefs?
That's what was said at the trial.
Yeah, most criminals claim they didn't do anything. What's your point? You
have no clue what actually happened.
Not the case. There is a clear pattern. In the past two years I have seen
several writers whose works I read arrested in the US of A. The all have
one thing in common. The ***** Abe Foxman.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P." |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
15 Jul 2007 12:41:32 AM |
|
|
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some cops
in your neighborhood.
Kind of like Bill Buford at Mt. Carmel, eh?
More like Chris Bollyn in Hoffman Estates.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
15 Jul 2007 06:25:02 AM |
|
|
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some cops
in your neighborhood.
Kind of like Bill Buford at Mt. Carmel, eh?
More like Chris Bollyn in Hoffman Estates.
So why had they already reported a fight at Bollyn's residence before any of
this went down? The only "fight" was when Fuxmen's Shabbos Goy goon-squad
assaulted Bollyn.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P." |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
15 Jul 2007 08:51:46 PM |
|
|
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
So why had they already reported a fight at Bollyn's residence before any
of
this went down?
Who reported a fight at Bollyn's residence?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
15 Jul 2007 11:41:00 AM |
|
|
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some cops
in your neighborhood.
Kind of like Bill Buford at Mt. Carmel, eh?
More like Chris Bollyn in Hoffman Estates.
So why had they already reported a fight at Bollyn's residence before any of
this went down? The only "fight" was when Fuxmen's Shabbos Goy goon-squad
assaulted Bollyn.
Your first mistake is believing Bollyn is telling the truth... about
anything.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
15 Jul 2007 11:50:07 AM |
|
|
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some
cops in your neighborhood.
Kind of like Bill Buford at Mt. Carmel, eh?
More like Chris Bollyn in Hoffman Estates.
So why had they already reported a fight at Bollyn's residence before any
of
this went down? The only "fight" was when Fuxmen's Shabbos Goy
goon-squad assaulted Bollyn.
Your first mistake is believing Bollyn is telling the truth... about
anything.
He provides exact references to the public record.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
15 Jul 2007 12:56:27 PM |
|
|
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some
cops in your neighborhood.
Kind of like Bill Buford at Mt. Carmel, eh?
More like Chris Bollyn in Hoffman Estates.
So why had they already reported a fight at Bollyn's residence before any
of
this went down? The only "fight" was when Fuxmen's Shabbos Goy
goon-squad assaulted Bollyn.
Your first mistake is believing Bollyn is telling the truth... about
anything.
He provides exact references to the public record.
Where?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
15 Jul 2007 01:24:31 PM |
|
|
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some
cops in your neighborhood.
Kind of like Bill Buford at Mt. Carmel, eh?
More like Chris Bollyn in Hoffman Estates.
So why had they already reported a fight at Bollyn's residence before
any of
this went down? The only "fight" was when Fuxmen's Shabbos Goy
goon-squad assaulted Bollyn.
Your first mistake is believing Bollyn is telling the truth... about
anything.
He provides exact references to the public record.
Where?
Why don't you try his web site?
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
15 Jul 2007 03:24:32 PM |
|
|
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
One need not get retarded and go whacko just because there are some
cops in your neighborhood.
Kind of like Bill Buford at Mt. Carmel, eh?
More like Chris Bollyn in Hoffman Estates.
So why had they already reported a fight at Bollyn's residence before
any of
this went down? The only "fight" was when Fuxmen's Shabbos Goy
goon-squad assaulted Bollyn.
Your first mistake is believing Bollyn is telling the truth... about
anything.
He provides exact references to the public record.
Where?
Why don't you try his web site?
I did. As I said, where?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
13 Jul 2007 10:11:59 AM |
|
|
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
Uh, that is not what happened to Christopher. There seems to be no
question
as to there being 3 heavily armed men in an unmarked car loitering around
his residence.
Those are "Law Enforcement Officers" to people who aren't whacked out
loons who think everyone is out to get them.
So he's not supposed to be concerned about 3 heavily armed "Law Enforcement
Officers" in an unmarked car loitering around his residence in a low crime
neighborhood.
They weren't loitering around his residence. They were driving on the
street.
He called 911 to have the situation checked out.
And was informed that they were law enforcement officers.
These guys have night sticks, side arms, pepper spray, armed backup, flack
jackets and handcuffs. Up against one unarmed man in sandals and a
Hawaiian shirt they found it necessary to taser him, after physically
restraining him?
And faced with men carrying those things and who have identified
themselves as law enforcement, he tells them he's going inside his house
"to get reinforcements".
He's a dumbass.
The egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements
should
have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told it.
Is that how you recall the incident as you witnessed it, or are you
imagining a 'truth' that fits with your beliefs?
That's what was said at the trial.
*****. That he said he was going for reinforcements was never
disputed by anyone at the trial. His own wife contradicted at least one
of his claims.
Christopher's only offense is speaking truth to power.
... and being a drunk, whacked out loon, unable to hold a normal
conversation with law enforcement officers asking him why he's acting like
a drunk whacked out loon.
They never provided any evidence that he was drunk.
He admits it.
Nor did they describe
any behavior indicative of drunkenness on his part.
Yes they did.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
13 Jul 2007 06:47:05 PM |
|
|
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
Uh, that is not what happened to Christopher. There seems to be no
question
as to there being 3 heavily armed men in an unmarked car loitering
around his residence.
Those are "Law Enforcement Officers" to people who aren't whacked out
loons who think everyone is out to get them.
So he's not supposed to be concerned about 3 heavily armed "Law
Enforcement Officers" in an unmarked car loitering around his residence
in a low crime neighborhood.
They weren't loitering around his residence. They were driving on the
street.
He called 911 to have the situation checked out.
And was informed that they were law enforcement officers.
These guys have night sticks, side arms, pepper spray, armed backup,
flack
jackets and handcuffs. Up against one unarmed man in sandals and a
Hawaiian shirt they found it necessary to taser him, after physically
restraining him?
And faced with men carrying those things and who have identified
themselves as law enforcement, he tells them he's going inside his house
"to get reinforcements".
He's a dumbass.
Do you actually believe he said that?
The egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements
should
have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told it.
Is that how you recall the incident as you witnessed it, or are you
imagining a 'truth' that fits with your beliefs?
That's what was said at the trial.
*****. That he said he was going for reinforcements was never
disputed by anyone at the trial. His own wife contradicted at least one
of his claims.
Something about her having seem some small metallic thing that looked like
some kind of badge when he as them to identify themselves. What he
actually said is that he was going to get his brother.
Christopher's only offense is speaking truth to power.
... and being a drunk, whacked out loon, unable to hold a normal
conversation with law enforcement officers asking him why he's acting
like a drunk whacked out loon.
They never provided any evidence that he was drunk.
He admits it.
Really? I haven't seen that. Where?
Nor did they describe
any behavior indicative of drunkenness on his part.
Yes they did.
Not according to the report from the trial.
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vandar" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
13 Jul 2007 09:27:26 PM |
|
|
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out loon
who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
Uh, that is not what happened to Christopher. There seems to be no
question
as to there being 3 heavily armed men in an unmarked car loitering
around his residence.
Those are "Law Enforcement Officers" to people who aren't whacked out
loons who think everyone is out to get them.
So he's not supposed to be concerned about 3 heavily armed "Law
Enforcement Officers" in an unmarked car loitering around his residence
in a low crime neighborhood.
They weren't loitering around his residence. They were driving on the
street.
He called 911 to have the situation checked out.
And was informed that they were law enforcement officers.
These guys have night sticks, side arms, pepper spray, armed backup,
flack
jackets and handcuffs. Up against one unarmed man in sandals and a
Hawaiian shirt they found it necessary to taser him, after physically
restraining him?
And faced with men carrying those things and who have identified
themselves as law enforcement, he tells them he's going inside his house
"to get reinforcements".
He's a dumbass.
Do you actually believe he said that?
The prosecution said he did and he never said he didn't.
Read what he wrote before he sobered up
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=91920
A couple of points about it:
The statement "They were not at all willing to identify themselves" was
directly contradicted by his wife during the trial. She said they showed
their badge.
Further, the statement "I ran to my front door...". He RAN from the
cops. Everyone knows that's a guaranteed way to spend a few hours in jail.
Since it's undisputed that he ran after saying he was going "to get
reinforcements", ZAP! Tasered, cuffed, arrested, tried, and convicted.
He also says that the police drive him 3 miles to the station, but he
had to walk 2 miles to his home when he was bailed out.
Then in this, which he wrote,
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn/Timeline_of_Events-arrest.html
He says he had to to walk 4 miles home. The distance has DOUBLED?
The egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements
should
have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told it.
Is that how you recall the incident as you witnessed it, or are you
imagining a 'truth' that fits with your beliefs?
That's what was said at the trial.
*****. That he said he was going for reinforcements was never
disputed by anyone at the trial. His own wife contradicted at least one
of his claims.
Something about her having seem some small metallic thing that looked like
some kind of badge when he as them to identify themselves. What he
actually said is that he was going to get his brother.
He said he was going to "get reinforcements". Whether he intended to
call his brother or get a weapon was unknown. He never said before he
RAN toward his house.
Christopher's only offense is speaking truth to power.
... and being a drunk, whacked out loon, unable to hold a normal
conversation with law enforcement officers asking him why he's acting
like a drunk whacked out loon.
They never provided any evidence that he was drunk.
He admits it.
Really? I haven't seen that. Where?
I'll rephrase: He didn't dispute it.
Nor did they describe
any behavior indicative of drunkenness on his part.
Yes they did.
Not according to the report from the trial.
Whose report?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hatto von Aquitanien" |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
13 Jul 2007 10:25:32 PM |
|
|
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
Vandar wrote:
Hatto von Aquitanien wrote:
John P. wrote:
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
Sire, if you define political persecution as "being a whacked out
loon who
sees shadows around every corner and thinks his breakfast cereal is
really
talking to him".
Uh, that is not what happened to Christopher. There seems to be no
question
as to there being 3 heavily armed men in an unmarked car loitering
around his residence.
Those are "Law Enforcement Officers" to people who aren't whacked out
loons who think everyone is out to get them.
So he's not supposed to be concerned about 3 heavily armed "Law
Enforcement Officers" in an unmarked car loitering around his residence
in a low crime neighborhood.
They weren't loitering around his residence. They were driving on the
street.
He called 911 to have the situation checked out.
And was informed that they were law enforcement officers.
These guys have night sticks, side arms, pepper spray, armed backup,
flack
jackets and handcuffs. Up against one unarmed man in sandals and a
Hawaiian shirt they found it necessary to taser him, after physically
restraining him?
And faced with men carrying those things and who have identified
themselves as law enforcement, he tells them he's going inside his house
"to get reinforcements".
He's a dumbass.
Do you actually believe he said that?
The prosecution said he did and he never said he didn't.
Read what he wrote before he sobered up
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=91920
<quote>
I was just in my house a few minutes when the very same suspicious car
stopped in front of my house and three armor-clad men stood on my driveway.
I had just been calling the police department and put down the phone. I was
more than a little surprised to see these armor-clad thugs on my driveway.
My wife and 8-year old daughter were already there and I asked these men who
they were and why they were harassing my street. Why are you driving around
with this unmarked car around my house, I asked? Who are you, anyway? They
were not at all willing to identify themselves and were very
confrontational, to say the least.
I ran to my front door to call my brother when the three of them tackled me
and shocked me with some sort of stun-gun. The three men then sat on me and
pushed my face in the dirt, handcuffed me and put me in their car.
Remember, I had called 911 because of a suspicious car in my neighborhood, a
neighborhood I have known since 1957, when my parents helped found this
town.
I have two small children, after all, and this car looked very threatening
to me. This is what I call my normal neighborhood obligations, but I
discovered that they are actually watching us. They even joked about it at
the station later. "We are watching you," they said.
</quote>
A couple of points about it:
The statement "They were not at all willing to identify themselves" was
directly contradicted by his wife during the trial. She said they showed
their badge.
I note the singular. I also recall more detail of what she said.
Further, the statement "I ran to my front door...". He RAN from the
cops. Everyone knows that's a guaranteed way to spend a few hours in jail.
Since it's undisputed that he ran after saying he was going "to get
reinforcements", ZAP! Tasered, cuffed, arrested, tried, and convicted.
He was on his property, as were they. They did not properly identify
themselves. He had committed no crime. What were they doing there in the
first place?
He also says that the police drive him 3 miles to the station, but he
had to walk 2 miles to his home when he was bailed out.
Then in this, which he wrote,
http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn/Timeline_of_Events-arrest.html
He says he had to to walk 4 miles home. The distance has DOUBLED?
Yawn.
The egregious lie about him going to call for militia reinforcements
should
have resulted in a charge of perjury against the liar who told it.
Is that how you recall the incident as you witnessed it, or are you
imagining a 'truth' that fits with your beliefs?
That's what was said at the trial.
*****. That he said he was going for reinforcements was never
disputed by anyone at the trial. His own wife contradicted at least one
of his claims.
Something about her having seem some small metallic thing that looked
like
some kind of badge when he as them to identify themselves. What he
actually said is that he was going to get his brother.
He said he was going to "get reinforcements".
He said he was going to get his brother.
Whether he intended to
call his brother or get a weapon was unknown. He never said before he
RAN toward his house.
What the hell was Fuxmen's goon-squad doing there in the first place?
Christopher's only offense is speaking truth to power.
... and being a drunk, whacked out loon, unable to hold a normal
conversation with law enforcement officers asking him why he's acting
like a drunk whacked out loon.
They never provided any evidence that he was drunk.
He admits it.
Really? I haven't seen that. Where?
I'll rephrase: He didn't dispute it.
He didn't dignify it.
Nor did they describe
any behavior indicative of drunkenness on his part.
Yes they did.
Not according to the report from the trial.
Whose report?
--
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-updated
http://911research.wtc7.net
http://vehme.blogspot.com
Virtus Tutissima Cassis
.
|
|
|
| User: "John P." |
|
| Title: Re: The disappearance of Christopher Bollyn and his family |
14 Jul 2007 03:47:50 PM |
|
|
"Hatto von Aquitanien" <abbot@AugiaDives.hre> wrote in a message
He was on his property, as were they. They did not properly identify
themselves. He had committed no crime. What were they doing there in the
first place?
It would seem that, after having been told they were cops, he still somehow,
in his drunken stupor, figure out who these people were (but he knew they
were in an "unmarked" car). It would seem these cops were asked, by the
dispatcher, to stop by this drunken loons house to explain who they were.
Since he obviously knew they were cops from the very beginning, his *****
about them not identifying themselves is just more drunken idiocy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
