| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
21 Jun 2006 05:58:28 PM |
| Object: |
The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any questions?
LN
.
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 10:42:35 PM |
|
|
wrote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any questions?
Yes - what was your point? Are those buildings in the background part of the base?
I doubt it. Where was this taken? Why are they wearing yellow instead of orange?
http://poorwilliam.net/pix/gitmo-prisoner.jpg
Why do those yellow uniforms have pockets?
Why are you so gullible?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
23 Jun 2006 03:56:00 AM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:449B632B.7AEEA40D@hotmMOVEail.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any questions?
Yes - what was your point? Are those buildings in the background part of
the base?
I doubt it. Where was this taken? Why are they wearing yellow instead of
orange?
http://poorwilliam.net/pix/gitmo-prisoner.jpg
Why do those yellow uniforms have pockets?
Why are you so gullible?
Why are you so stupid that you can't figure out from where this picture
originates, nor that it's left's Fascist in the garbed robes?
Here, I can make it elementary for you retards who want to joint the
conversation.....
http://www.guardian.co.uk/eu/story/0,,1802742,00.html
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
25 Jun 2006 09:56:34 PM |
|
|
wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:449B632B.7AEEA40D@hotmMOVEail.com...
wrote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any questions?
Yes - what was your point? Are those buildings in the background part of
the base?
I doubt it. Where was this taken? Why are they wearing yellow instead of
orange?
http://poorwilliam.net/pix/gitmo-prisoner.jpg
Why do those yellow uniforms have pockets?
Why are you so gullible?
Why are you so stupid that you can't figure out from where this picture
Not in Gitmo. That was the point. Caught you trying to pass it off as
Gitmo...
originates, nor that it's left's Fascist in the garbed robes?
Could you repeat that in English please?
Here, I can make it elementary for you retards who want to joint the
conversation.....
http://www.guardian.co.uk/eu/story/0,,1802742,00.html
LN
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "rts" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
21 Jun 2006 07:53:45 PM |
|
|
wrote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any questions?
LN
"Fascist Left" is an oxymoron, moron.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 07:40:34 PM |
|
|
Moral law examples -- outlaw heroin, outlaw prostitution, outlaw
abortion
Economic law examples-- have a minimum wage, have laws regarding
retirement and overtime
Conservative - For Moral Laws, Against Economic laws
Liberal - Against Moral Laws, For Economic Laws
Libertarian - Against Moral Laws, Against Economic Laws
Fascist - For Moral Laws, For Economic Laws
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 11:51:27 AM |
|
|
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the fact
remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much similar
to the Fascist of last century.
LN
"rts" <senninha@ziplip.com> wrote in message
news:1150937625.628901.201920@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
needham@syix.com wrote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any questions?
LN
"Fascist Left" is an oxymoron, moron.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Agosta" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 12:16:54 PM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:jUzmg.48867$fb2.6924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the fact
remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much similar
to the Fascist of last century.
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos behavior
and tactics are close to that definition.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 02:45:34 PM |
|
|
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:rsCdndzKwaEUTQfZnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:jUzmg.48867$fb2.6924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the fact
remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much
similar to the Fascist of last century.
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
I really don't give a rats-***** what you believe or what you have deluded
yourself into believing. After all you're NOT the carte-Blanche
authoritarian. Additionally, that old tired rant that only the right can be
Fascist is *****. Any political persuasion can employ such draconian
principles as Fascism. To argue otherwise would be like arguing the Prince
of Wales could not be seduced by drugs or other human frailties. Fascism is
NOT a party dependent behavior. It is however, political ideology which can
be co-opted by those with the best or worse of intentions.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos
behavior and tactics are close to that definition.
Here you go moron Merriam-Webster Online, so shove it up your ***** and choke
on it!
LN
http://m-w.com/dictionary/fascist
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that
of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and
that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial
leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression
of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial
control <early instances of army fascism and brutality -- J. W. Aldridge>
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 08:14:40 PM |
|
|
National Socialist Germany was not different from other countries
in regard to free speech laws. The only difference was the right was
in power instead of the left. Before Hitler was in power he had a lot
of his papers banned. Hitler said:
"You talk about persecution!" (to an address by the Social Democratic
speaker) "I think that there are only a few of us [in our party] here
who did not have to suffer persecutions in prison from your side ...
You seem to have totally forgotten that for years our shirts were
ripped off our backs because you did not like the color . . . In those
days, our newspapers were banned and banned and again banned, our
meetings were forbidden, and we were forbidden to speak, I was
forbidden to speak, for years on. And now you say that criticism is
salutary!"
Even today most countries do not have free speech. In leftist
Germany today people get arrested for doubting the holo story and
other things. People in Britain get arrested for politically incorrect
speech or writing. Saying that the races are not all equal in
intelligence is against the law there.
The United States has the most free speech but even here it has
banned things. At one time the play "Merchant of Venice" was banned in
New York because it offended the Jews. People in America were arrested
for their beliefs during WWII. All countries did that.
But the United States does have the most free speech and this was a
great idea. Hitler also had a great idea of removing the Jews from
controlling the media. If we could combine these two ideas we could
have a winning combination. Allowing free speech is not the same as
allowing one unelected group to virtually control all of the media.
The media is the real power, and a minor post such as President of the
United States is like nothing by comparison. Why are we voting for
President and not voting for who will control the media? When it comes
to owning TV stations it is only money that talks, not morality or
virtue.
In the Jews country, which Americans are giving billions of
dollars to, they don't allow non-Jews to own certain media.
National Socialism was mainly about things like making Germany for
the Germans, and rejecting both Communism and Capitalism. But Free
Speech is also a great idea. National Socialists today should make it
clear that Free Speech is sacred and that no party should be allowed
to change that.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 04:34:10 PM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:yrCmg.101646$H71.20285@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:rsCdndzKwaEUTQfZnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:jUzmg.48867$fb2.6924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the fact
remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much
similar to the Fascist of last century.
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
I really don't give a rats-***** what you believe or what you have deluded
yourself into believing. After all you're NOT the carte-Blanche
authoritarian. Additionally, that old tired rant that only the right can
be Fascist is *****. Any political persuasion can employ such draconian
principles as Fascism. To argue otherwise would be like arguing the Prince
of Wales could not be seduced by drugs or other human frailties. Fascism
is NOT a party dependent behavior. It is however, political ideology which
can be co-opted by those with the best or worse of intentions.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos
behavior and tactics are close to that definition.
Here you go moron Merriam-Webster Online, so shove it up your ***** and
choke on it!
LN
http://m-w.com/dictionary/fascist
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that
of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual
and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a
dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible
suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or
dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality -- J.
W. Aldridge>
Hummm, that doesn't sound liberal to me sounds kinda...well...conservative.
Thanks for that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 08:17:37 PM |
|
|
Many people think they arrive at their own ideas all by themselves,
when in fact their ideas are usually made for them by Hollywood. Take
two movies that are anti-leadership propaganda, Gladiator, and
Braveheart.
In Gladiator they show a corrupt leader of Rome, but would it be
corrupt if Maximus was the leader? That would be much better than
having the lame senators running Rome. And of course in Braveheart the
Scots should have made William their leader. If he was the leader he
could have put the corrupt nobles in their place.
The purpose of the propaganda is to stop good people from wanting
power. The people who have the real power now, the bankers and the
media, are not threatened in the least by libertarians. But if there
was a leader that was really for the people they know they would be
put in their place.
In democracies money talks and those who can buy TV stations are
the rulers. These rulers don't even claim to be for anything but their
own profits and interests. People are much better off with a good
leader who has power above the money power.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 05:10:24 PM |
|
|
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:m1Emg.9617$lf4.1459@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:yrCmg.101646$H71.20285@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:rsCdndzKwaEUTQfZnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:jUzmg.48867$fb2.6924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the
fact remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much
similar to the Fascist of last century.
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
I really don't give a rats-***** what you believe or what you have deluded
yourself into believing. After all you're NOT the carte-Blanche
authoritarian. Additionally, that old tired rant that only the right can
be Fascist is *****. Any political persuasion can employ such
draconian principles as Fascism. To argue otherwise would be like arguing
the Prince of Wales could not be seduced by drugs or other human
frailties. Fascism is NOT a party dependent behavior. It is however,
political ideology which can be co-opted by those with the best or worse
of intentions.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos
behavior and tactics are close to that definition.
Here you go moron Merriam-Webster Online, so shove it up your ***** and
choke on it!
LN
http://m-w.com/dictionary/fascist
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as
that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the
individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed
by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and
forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or
dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality -- J.
W. Aldridge>
Hummm, that doesn't sound liberal to me sounds
kinda...well...conservative. Thanks for that.
Hmmm... I'm not one bit surprised that you process the world in which you
live on the basis of feelings, emotions & melody instead of employing logic
and reasoning!
You're welcome lib....
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 05:35:13 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:10:24 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
"Kevin Cunningham" <smskjd@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:m1Emg.9617$lf4.1459@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:yrCmg.101646$H71.20285@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:rsCdndzKwaEUTQfZnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:jUzmg.48867$fb2.6924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the
fact remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much
similar to the Fascist of last century.
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
I really don't give a rats-***** what you believe or what you have deluded
yourself into believing. After all you're NOT the carte-Blanche
authoritarian. Additionally, that old tired rant that only the right can
be Fascist is *****. Any political persuasion can employ such
draconian principles as Fascism. To argue otherwise would be like arguing
the Prince of Wales could not be seduced by drugs or other human
frailties. Fascism is NOT a party dependent behavior. It is however,
political ideology which can be co-opted by those with the best or worse
of intentions.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos
behavior and tactics are close to that definition.
Here you go moron Merriam-Webster Online, so shove it up your ***** and
choke on it!
LN
http://m-w.com/dictionary/fascist
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as
that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the
individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed
by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and
forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or
dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality -- J.
W. Aldridge>
Hummm, that doesn't sound liberal to me sounds
kinda...well...conservative. Thanks for that.
Hmmm... I'm not one bit surprised that you process the world in which you
live on the basis of feelings, emotions & melody instead of employing logic
and reasoning!
You're welcome lib....
LN
You know what they say... Those who rely absolutely on what their gut
tells them, usually have their heads so far up their ***** to hear that
gut that they have never seen the sunshine.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Agosta" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 10:36:45 PM |
|
|
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:yrCmg.101646$H71.20285@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:rsCdndzKwaEUTQfZnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:jUzmg.48867$fb2.6924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the fact
remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much
similar to the Fascist of last century.
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
I really don't give a rats-***** what you believe or what you have deluded
yourself into believing. After all you're NOT the carte-Blanche
authoritarian. Additionally, that old tired rant that only the right can
be Fascist is *****. Any political persuasion can employ such draconian
principles as Fascism. To argue otherwise would be like arguing the Prince
of Wales could not be seduced by drugs or other human frailties. Fascism
is NOT a party dependent behavior. It is however, political ideology which
can be co-opted by those with the best or worse of intentions.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos
behavior and tactics are close to that definition.
Here you go moron Merriam-Webster Online, so shove it up your ***** and
choke on it!
LN
http://m-w.com/dictionary/fascist
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that
of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual
and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a
dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible
suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or
dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality -- J.
W. Aldridge>
I know full and well what "fascist" means. Appearently, you do not.
Because if you did know what the word means, you would recognize that it
is the Republican power base that personifies this definition.
The definition in the dictionary suits the BUSH regime, not any past regime
in the history of the United States, Republican, nor Democratic.
No sir, it is the BUSH regime that fits this definition, and no other.
You're trying to connect the "left's" priciples to fascism.
When in reality, (read your own dictionary's definition.) it is the BUSH
regime
that fits your complaint more so than any other.
That's the fact. Accept it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
23 Jun 2006 03:52:25 AM |
|
|
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:SrudnSJwP5BM_AbZnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:yrCmg.101646$H71.20285@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:rsCdndzKwaEUTQfZnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:jUzmg.48867$fb2.6924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the
fact remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much
similar to the Fascist of last century.
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
I really don't give a rats-***** what you believe or what you have deluded
yourself into believing. After all you're NOT the carte-Blanche
authoritarian. Additionally, that old tired rant that only the right can
be Fascist is *****. Any political persuasion can employ such
draconian principles as Fascism. To argue otherwise would be like arguing
the Prince of Wales could not be seduced by drugs or other human
frailties. Fascism is NOT a party dependent behavior. It is however,
political ideology which can be co-opted by those with the best or worse
of intentions.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos
behavior and tactics are close to that definition.
Here you go moron Merriam-Webster Online, so shove it up your ***** and
choke on it!
LN
http://m-w.com/dictionary/fascist
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as
that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the
individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed
by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and
forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or
dictatorial control <early instances of army fascism and brutality -- J.
W. Aldridge>
I know full and well what "fascist" means. Appearently, you do not.
Setting yourself up as some the strawman authority on this point is quite
childish. But go ahead; it seems liberals always play this silly game in
order to avoid explaining why the political ideology which best explains
democrat behavior is Fascism....
Because if you did know what the word means, you would recognize that it
is the Republican power base that personifies this definition.
Now you're just lying, plain & simple!
The definition in the dictionary suits the BUSH regime, not any past
regime
in the history of the United States, Republican, nor Democratic.
Not true at all. For one, Dems promote group rights over individual
rights.... ALWAYS...
The left's tired old argument that Bush is a dictatorial is nothing more
than a baseless diatribe, but that's usually their main theme & I suispect
yours here.....
Sorry kid, but you're out of your league here...
No sir, it is the BUSH regime that fits this definition, and no other.
Liar....
You're trying to connect the "left's" priciples to fascism.
Duh.... when a party propensity lends toward a certain ideological
principle, it's entirely fair to identify that political ideology which best
suits them. Here, it's clearly the dems that best suits Fascist principles.
The fact that I recognize this & throw it in your face merely irritates
you....
BFD!
When in reality, (read your own dictionary's definition.) it is the BUSH
regime
that fits your complaint more so than any other.
That's Merriam-Webster's definition. The fact that you would attempt to
promote otherwise is quite disenginuious and exposes you for one who
employes propaganda, another tool of Fascist!
That's the fact. Accept it.
The fact that the left continues to promote this ***** while practicing
Fascism themselves is the BIG LIE which not only they want others to
believe, but also the one they have delude themselves into believing in the
face of all evidence to the contrary!
Seek that truth & you'll sleep better...
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
23 Jun 2006 10:06:50 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 08:52:25 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Setting yourself up as some the strawman authority on this point is quite
childish. But go ahead; it seems liberals always play this silly game in
order to avoid explaining why the political ideology which best explains
democrat behavior is Fascism....
This web site explains what is going on with the "left" and the
"right" in the modern economic sense.
http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm
The meaning of "right" and "left" has changed. I stay with the
original meaning for the same reason I refuse to call homosexual
perverts "gay". The word "gay" was originally a good thing.
The right is for outlawing homosexual perversion,
prostitution, abortions, heroin, and other bad things. It puts the
good of the nation first and ahead of the freedom of individuals to
corrupt the culture of the nation.
Leftists believe in the Rede of Witchcraft which states-- If it
harm none, do what will you will. This sounds nice, but like the apple
that the witch gave to Snow White it has poison within. The Rede of
Witchcraft is the Bible of liberalism. It would legalize homosexual
perversion, prostitution, drugs, etc.
The right is for building a great nation. Leftists care only
about individual freedom and are opposed to any laws that would make
the nation better. There are beaches where normal families will not go
because homosexual perverts practice their perversion on the beach.
When the liberals say they are for freedom this is kind of thing they
are talking about. Of course people should be free to do what they
want most of the time. There is no argument there. Liberals are
talking about being free to do things that many people object to and
want outlawed. Their philosophy, taken to its logical conclusion,
would not allow the law that says drivers have to stop at the red
lights. Their philosophy would allow heroin to be sold on grocery
store shelves and allow ads promoting heroin on TV. Their philosophy
would result in chaos and degeneracy.
Libertarians are liberals who want freedom for the Ebenezer
Scrooges to be as greedy as they want. They have the same philosophy
as other leftist who want to legalize heroin and prostitution, namely
that the state can't tell them what they can't do. People don't like
laws stopping them from doing things, and we should sympathize with
that, but sometimes that is not the most important thing. Capitalists
want freedom for greed, other liberals want freedom for degeneracy,
but good laws would make a nation good.
The Communists were leftist and they said they were fighting for
freedom. In Spain they sided with the anarchists. The Communists and
the anarchists were the same people or the same type of people. The
Communists were for having government but only temporarily. They said
that their government was necessary only until the whole world was
Communist. After the world was Communist they wanted to dissolve the
government and have an anarchy.
The right wing cares about the future. Leftists only care about the
present. If their philosophy results in a nightmare future like in
Soylent Green or some other futuristic nightmare they are not
interested and insist that nothing could be more important than the
freedom of individuals to be as decadent as they want. To see the kind
of society
libertarians are fighting for see the movie "8MM", they aren't for the
snuff part, but
other than that it shows liberalism in action.
The fact that the left continues to promote this ***** while practicing
Fascism themselves is the BIG LIE
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
context:
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity
for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than
any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their
very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a
race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has
branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of
Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not
wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth
to prevail."
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
23 Jun 2006 07:47:53 AM |
|
|
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:SrudnSJwP5BM_AbZnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:yrCmg.101646$H71.20285@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:rsCdndzKwaEUTQfZnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
<needham@syix.com> wrote in message
news:jUzmg.48867$fb2.6924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the fact
remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much similar
to the Fascist of last century.
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
I really don't give a rats-***** what you believe or what you have deluded
yourself into believing. After all you're NOT the carte-Blanche
authoritarian. Additionally, that old tired rant that only the right can be
Fascist is *****. Any political persuasion can employ such draconian
principles as Fascism. To argue otherwise would be like arguing the Prince of
Wales could not be seduced by drugs or other human frailties. Fascism is NOT
a party dependent behavior. It is however, political ideology which can be
co-opted by those with the best or worse of intentions.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos behavior
and tactics are close to that definition.
Here you go moron Merriam-Webster Online, so shove it up your ***** and choke
on it!
LN
http://m-w.com/dictionary/fascist
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of
the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that
stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial
leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of
opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial
control <early instances of army fascism and brutality -- J. W. Aldridge>
I know full and well what "fascist" means. Appearently, you do not.
Because if you did know what the word means, you would recognize that it
is the Republican power base that personifies this definition.
The definition in the dictionary suits the BUSH regime, not any past regime
in the history of the United States, Republican, nor Democratic.
No sir, it is the BUSH regime that fits this definition, and no other.
You're trying to connect the "left's" priciples to fascism.
And he is correct. The "left's principles" are
the essence of fascism.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
23 Jun 2006 10:08:44 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:47:53 -0500, "Bob" <no@email.address> wrote:
And he is correct. The "left's principles" are
the essence of fascism.
"Fascism now throws the noxious theories of so-called Liberalism upon
the rubbish heap.
Fascism...does not hesitate to call itself illiberal and
anti-liberal." - Benito Mussolini
In 1923 Mussolini was asked by an Italian encyclopedia person to
define and explain the word "Fascism" for their new edition. He said
the key concepts of fascism were overt nationalism, and repudiation of
liberalism in all its forms.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
23 Jun 2006 10:03:12 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:36:45 -0500, "John Agosta"
<j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote:
I know full and well what "fascist" means. Appearently, you do not.
Because if you did know what the word means, you would recognize that it
is the Republican power base that personifies this definition.
In March 1937 Mussolini made a spectacular state visit to Libya, where
he opened a new military highway running the entire length of the
colon., He had himself declared protector of Islam and was presented
with a symbolic sword.
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Libya/History
the Italian dictator Benito Mussolini arranged for Muslim notables
from Italian-ruled Libya to gird him with the "sword of Islam" during
a visit to Tripoli. "Muslims may rest assured," Mussolini intoned on
that occasion, "that Italy will always be the friend and protector of
Islam throughout the world." His foreign minister declared Muslim
values perfectly compatible with fascism: "The Islamic world, in
accordance with its traditions, loves in the Duce the wisdom of the
statesman united to the action of the warrior."74
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/90
Mussolini vows to help the Palestinian cause against the Jews.
http://www.stern.de/community/forum/thread.jsp?forum=35&thread=57402&message=840948
The definition in the dictionary suits the BUSH regime, not any past regime
in the history of the United States, Republican, nor Democratic.
Would the dictionaries be the same if the good side won WWII. Here is
a quote from Mein Kampf:
"The fight which Fascist Italy waged against Jewry's three
principal weapons, the profound reasons for which may not of been
consciously understood (though I do not believe this myself) furnishes
the best proof that the poison fangs of that Power which transcends
all State boundaries are being drawn, even though in an indirect way.
The prohibition of Freemasonry and secret societies, the suppression
of the supranational Press and the definite abolition of Marxism,
together with the steadily increasing consolidation of the Fascist
concept of the State--all this will enable the Italian Government, in
the course of some years, to advance more and more the interests of
the Italian people without paying any attention to the hissing of the
Jewish world-hydra.
"The English situation is not so favorable. In that country
which has 'the freest democracy' the Jew dictates his will, almost
unrestrained but indirectly, through his influence on public opinion."
No sir, it is the BUSH regime that fits this definition, and no other.
"Bush stated that we must "ensure that anti-Semitism" - that is,
any writings that Jews don't like - "is excluded from school
text books, official statements, official television programming
and official publications...." Thanks, G.W. It's good to know
what your priorities are. Can you imagine Bush or Powell or
Giuliani, as much as they hate free speech, ever calling for laws
to suppress criticism of White people or even of America? It's
not going to happen. Forget it. Yet, in the hushed tones usually
reserved for sacred words spoken in church, they piously intone
that words critical of Jews be eliminated or made illegal. They
intone these words at international conferences, paid for by you
the taxpayers, called into session specifically for the purpose
of ending criticism of Jews. How much more obvious does it have
to be, dear listeners? Powell and Bush and Giuliani have given us
such a crystal clear example of Jewish power over our "leaders"
that even the most dense should be able to 'get it.'
Do you think that the OSCE delegates were mainly concerned with
stopping physical attacks on Jews and not on suppressing freedom
of speech? Think again. The Dutch delegate to the conference,
Daan Everts, specifically cited "[racist] music [and] racist
slogans" -- slogans! -- as 'problems' to be addressed by new
laws.
And Israel's chief representative at the conference, Avraham
Toledo, specifically called on member governments to make
'anti-Semitism' a criminal offense. That's where they are going
with this. It can't possibly be any more obvious. A more chilling
nightmare scenario could not have been penned by a science
fiction author characterizing the Jews as a parasitic alien
species who have invaded us and taken over the ruling class in
our societies, and who are slowly programming us to kill or
imprison any 'rebels' who question the new ruling class, worship
of which is gradually being introduced in our schools and
churches as a pseudo-religion to cement their power over us.
[ <http://tinyurl.com/etzr> ]
It's interesting that the Bush administration withdrew its
delegates from the UN-sponsored 'World Conference Against Racism'
held in South Africa in 2001 when it was discovered that Jews
would be criticized for their treatment of Palestinians there.
But they enthusiastically endorse -- with the participation of
Powell, Giuliani, and even Bush himself -- this conference in
Vienna in which the entire focus is criminalizing criticism of
Jews and Jews alone. Clearly, our captured rulers have no problem
with the concept of conferences on racism. But conferences that
criticize Jews, however mildly, are verboten. And conferences
that denounce critics of Jews and Israel are national and
international priorities. It's Jewish interests that are their
driving force at all places and at all times. Jewish interests.
Not American interests. Not White interests. Any people so
betrayed by its own alleged leaders will not long survive on
Earth.
On June 18th, Giuliani stated that when people characterize Jews
"in inhumane ways, and make salacious statements in parliaments
or the press" about Jews, they are "attacking the defining values
of our societies and our international institutions."
Just as he did in the United States a few years ago, Giuliani
went on to call for special punishment for anyone in Europe found
to have violated his proposed 'hate crime' laws, punishment far
more severe than for similar offenses when the motivation was not
found to be dislike of Jews. He specifically justified this
unequal punishment of those who criticize Jews on the basis that
crimes against Jews are "particularly heinous." Crimes against
Englishmen, crimes against Italians, crimes against Frenchmen,
crimes against Americans -- well, they're just crimes. Crimes
against Jews require special punishment. They're "particularly
heinous." Conferences must be held and new laws must be passed.
Giuliani ...continues
as he tells us what the real function of law should be in a
'good' society of obedient goyim: "Yes, some will argue that hate
crimes need not be punished more harshly than similar crimes
committed for different reasons. But the fact is that extra
penalties are used throughout civilized legal systems - in Europe
as well as America - as a way to distinguish acts that are
particularly heinous. One of the functions of the law is to
teach, to draw lines between what's permissible and what's
forbidden."
[ <http://tinyurl.com/f7j3> ]
More chills for your spine, ladies and gentlemen. "...what's
permissible and what's forbidden" as defined by Rudy Giuliani and
his Jewish masters. We don't need Alfred Hitchcock or Stephen
King anymore, now that we've got Rudy and the Jews. Yes,
"...what's permissible and what's forbidden" -- truth about the
Jewish criminal conspiracy that is destroying our race and
nations is forbidden. Freedom is forbidden. A free press is
forbidden. Jewish ascendancy in a society often ends this way...
Giuliani continues his sermon, letting us know that there can
only be one point of view and one sacred victim group in World
War II history: "Making sure their citizens have an honest
understanding of the Holocaust is vital, as revisionist
viewpoints put us at risk of a repetition of race-based genocide.
Schools must look at how they educate children regarding
tolerance and fairness. Universities, public officials,
advertisers and the news media should publicize the tremendous
contributions that Jews have made to European societies through
the years."
Giuliani states that his purpose with regard to the rising
awareness of Jewish power and Jewish crimes in Europe is to see
that this increased consciousness is 'turned around.' I quote
from his June 13 address at the State department after accepting
the OSCE 'commission': "Coming from New York City and having had
the experience of being mayor of the world's most diverse city,
you learn... the value of having a focus on hate crimes and hate
incidents.... And then focusing your attention on those places in
which you have to educate people or you have to deal with people
who are wrongdoers. And the fact that this organization is giving
attention to this at this level, I think is a very positive sign
that we will be able to deal with it at this stage and start to
turn it in the right direction."
[ <http://tinyurl.com/f7lu> ]
It's clear that Rudy Giuliani's political ambitions are far from
over. His brown-nosing of the Jews has reached a fever pitch. We
can expect the same from ambitious politicians like Hilary
Clinton and many others as 2004 approaches. Elections in the
United States have become more and more contests between cynical
lying hacks who compete for favorable media coverage by trying to
be more subservient to the Jews and to Israel than the next
cynical lying hack. This guarantees them good coverage and more
votes from the unthinking victims of media manipulation. The
Semitically Sycophantic rhetoric will be more heated than ever in
future elections, as it takes extreme statements to compete for
the Jews' favor with George W., who was willing to slaughter
Arabs and Americans by the thousands for them.
But, as the ambitions and the actions of the Jews become more
extreme, the awareness they are trying to suppress will start to
bloom all over Europe, all over North America, and everywhere
where they have set up their criminal conspiracy to harness our
people for their evil ends and to eventually eradicate our race
from the face of the Earth. That's the historical pattern. Jews
gain power in a society, abuse that power through arrogance and
hate, and eventually the oppressed people expel their oppressors.
But this time, the process is not limited to one country like
20th century Germany or 15th century Spain. The process is now
global. And, as we and the other peoples of the Earth realize
that our mutual needs for self-determination and for freedom from
Jewish domination coincide, the days of the Jewish cryptocracy
will be numbered.
Instead of a government that serves Jewish interests above all,
and serves other minority interests as long as they don't
conflict with Jewish interests, we must have a government that
serves White interests. Under such a government, our labor and
our tax dollars and our blood would be expended only when they
served future generations of Whites, not squandered on the
megalomaniac dreams of the self-Chosen or on breeding the biomass
that threatens to engulf us. The conferences we will convene will
hold lying White politicians like Rudy Giuliani to account, and
will focus on such issues as the genocides against Whites
committed by Jews in Europe during the last century, and on
righting wrongs like the sexual slavery of young White women and
girls being practiced now by Jewish criminal gangs in Israel and
elsewhere.
When we have a government which pursues White interests instead
of Jewish interests, we will be incomparably richer, incomparably
more secure, incomparably more technically advanced and powerful
-- and, in terms of Nature's highest commandment, the protection
of our children and our posterity, incomparably more moral than
we are today.
That is the task of the National Alliance. Join us today; write
to PO Box 90, Hillsboro WV 24946 USA, or apply online at"
<http://www.natvan.com> .
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of
ADV-list.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
==> To subscribe send an e-mail message to:
adv-list-request@NatVan.com
The subject of the message should be: Subscribe
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 08:13:21 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:16:54 -0500, "John Agosta"
<j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote:
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos behavior
and tactics are close to that definition.
Would the dictionaries be the same if the good side won WWII?
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Agosta" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 10:44:40 PM |
|
|
"Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40gm925bj33s4qhsljmrhau6l43qjus9ea@4ax.com...
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 12:16:54 -0500, "John Agosta"
<j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote:
I don't beleive you know what the word fascist means.
Why don't you look it up int the disctionary, and then tell us whos
behavior
and tactics are close to that definition.
Would the dictionaries be the same if the good side won WWII?
Don't live in the past.
Some guy is trying to say that the "left" is facist, when in reality - when
the facts show -
that the Bush regime fits the current definition of the word more so than
any other administration in US history.
People like to throw sensitive words around. But people need to know what
they mean.
And the moron who suggests that the "left" are fascists, is just that - a
moron.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
23 Jun 2006 10:12:23 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:44:40 -0500, "John Agosta"
<j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote:
Don't live in the past.
The villain of 1984 proclaims, "The whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow
the range of thought." He concludes, "The Revolution will be complete
when the language is perfect."
Some guy is trying to say that the "left" is facist, when in reality - when
the facts show -
that the Bush regime fits the current definition of the word more so than
any other administration in US history.
The Bush regime fits the opposite of fascism more so than any in
history.
In March 1937 Mussolini made a spectacular state visit to Libya, where
he opened a new military highway running the entire length of the
colon., He had himself declared protector of Islam and was presented
with a symbolic sword.
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Libya/History
the Italian dictator Benito Mussolini arranged for Muslim notables
from Italian-ruled Libya to gird him with the "sword of Islam" during
a visit to Tripoli. "Muslims may rest assured," Mussolini intoned on
that occasion, "that Italy will always be the friend and protector of
Islam throughout the world." His foreign minister declared Muslim
values perfectly compatible with fascism: "The Islamic world, in
accordance with its traditions, loves in the Duce the wisdom of the
statesman united to the action of the warrior."74
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/90
Mussolini vows to help the Palestinian cause against the Jews.
http://www.stern.de/community/forum/thread.jsp?forum=35&thread=57402&message=840948
People like to throw sensitive words around. But people need to know what
they mean.
And the moron who suggests that the "left" are fascists, is just that - a
moron.
Moral law examples -- outlaw heroin, outlaw prostitution, outlaw
abortion
Economic law examples-- have a minimum wage, have laws regarding
retirement and overtime
Conservative - For Moral Laws, Against Economic laws
Liberal - Against Moral Laws, For Economic Laws
Libertarian - Against Moral Laws, Against Economic Laws
Fascist - For Moral Laws, For Economic Laws
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 08:12:24 PM |
|
|
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:51:27 GMT, <needham@syix.com> wrote:
Maybe in your upside-down surreality. Deny it all you want, but the fact
remains is the left's principles, behavior & tactics are very much similar
to the Fascist of last century.
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down Müllerstraße it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platorm I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where there
were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised by
what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
21 Jun 2006 08:05:40 PM |
|
|
rts wrote:
needham@syix.com wrote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any questions?
LN
"Fascist Left" is an oxymoron, moron.
That's needleloon for you.
Historically challenged as well as mentally challenged.
--
"I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do,
because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."
- Susan B. Anthony, 1896
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 11:57:19 AM |
|
|
"Tempest" <tempest@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4499ECA1.4070709@hotmail.com...
rts wrote:
needham@syix.com wrote:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any questions?
LN
"Fascist Left" is an oxymoron, moron.
That's needleloon for you.
Historically challenged as well as mentally challenged.
I'm surprised you have the moxie to veer your ugly head in this discussion
teapot. After all, every time you deny my undeniable evidence how the left
have morphed into Fascist, you can only appeal to some ad hominem attack
instead of addressing the facts presented head-on.
Your cowardice and propensity to run from damning arguments which expose the
hypocrisy of you & your party are well documented here on Usenet, just as is
your preference to substitute insults and personal attacks instead of
respectable debate...
Although typical, but just another day on the propaganda circuit for you
teapot!
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "Topaz" |
|
| Title: Re: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 08:00:26 PM |
|
|
"Fascism now throws the noxious theories of so-called Liberalism upon
the rubbish heap.
Fascism...does not hesitate to call itself illiberal and
anti-liberal." - Benito Mussolini
In 1923 Mussolini was asked by an Italian encyclopedia person to
define and explain the word "Fascism" for their new edition. He said
the key concepts of fascism were overt nationalism, and repudiation of
liberalism in all its forms.
This web site explains what is going on with the "left" and the
"right" in the modern economic sense.
http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm
The meaning of "right" and "left" has changed. I stay with the
original meaning for the same reason I refuse to call homosexual
perverts "gay". The word "gay" was originally a good thing.
The right is for outlawing homosexual perversion,
prostitution, abortions, heroin, and other bad things. It puts the
good of the nation first and ahead of the freedom of individuals to
corrupt the culture of the nation.
Leftists believe in the Rede of Witchcraft which states-- If it
harm none, do what will you will. This sounds nice, but like the apple
that the witch gave to Snow White it has poison within. The Rede of
Witchcraft is the Bible of liberalism. It would legalize homosexual
perversion, prostitution, drugs, etc.
The right is for building a great nation. Leftists care only
about individual freedom and are opposed to any laws that would make
the nation better. There are beaches where normal families will not go
because homosexual perverts practice their perversion on the beach.
When the liberals say they are for freedom this is kind of thing they
are talking about. Of course people should be free to do what they
want most of the time. There is no argument there. Liberals are
talking about being free to do things that many people object to and
want outlawed. Their philosophy, taken to its logical conclusion,
would not allow the law that says drivers have to stop at the red
lights. Their philosophy would allow heroin to be sold on grocery
store shelves and allow ads promoting heroin on TV. Their philosophy
would result in chaos and degeneracy.
Libertarians are liberals who want freedom for the Ebenezer
Scrooges to be as greedy as they want. They have the same philosophy
as other leftist who want to legalize heroin and prostitution, namely
that the state can't tell them what they can't do. People don't like
laws stopping them from doing things, and we should sympathize with
that, but sometimes that is not the most important thing. Capitalists
want freedom for greed, other liberals want freedom for degeneracy,
but good laws would make a nation good.
The Communists were leftist and they said they were fighting for
freedom. In Spain they sided with the anarchists. The Communists and
the anarchists were the same people or the same type of people. The
Communists were for having government but only temporarily. They said
that their government was necessary only until the whole world was
Communist. After the world was Communist they wanted to dissolve the
government and have an anarchy.
The right wing cares about the future. Leftists only care about the
present. If their philosophy results in a nightmare future like in
Soylent Green or some other futuristic nightmare they are not
interested and insist that nothing could be more important than the
freedom of individuals to be as decadent as they want. To see the kind
of society
libertarians are fighting for see the movie "8MM", they aren't for the
snuff part, but
other than that it shows liberalism in action.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The PretZel" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 01:40:02 PM |
|
|
On 2006-06-21 15:58:28 -0700, <needham@syix.com> said:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any
questions?
LN
Is that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld?
--
The PREMIER of "An Evening With a Rightard" Part one!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp4o_eHOKF8
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
22 Jun 2006 02:49:57 PM |
|
|
"The PretZel" <sourdough@saltwithmustard.com> wrote in message
news:200606221140028930-sourdough@saltwithmustardcom...
On 2006-06-21 15:58:28 -0700, <needham@syix.com> said:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any
questions?
LN
Is that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld?
Surprising surprise, it's your leftist (Fascist) comrades in the Vienna who
were recently protesting Bush. One can only wonder why they were too ashamed
to reveal their true identities. Oh well, that's typical for the Fascist
left!
Here's the article for your pleasure:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/eu/story/0,,1802742,00.html
LN
.
|
|
|
| User: "The PretZel" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
24 Jun 2006 01:31:13 AM |
|
|
On 2006-06-22 12:49:57 -0700, <needham@syix.com> said:
"The PretZel" <sourdough@saltwithmustard.com> wrote in message
news:200606221140028930-sourdough@saltwithmustardcom...
On 2006-06-21 15:58:28 -0700, <needham@syix.com> said:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any
questions?
LN
Is
that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld?
Surprising surprise, it's your leftist (Fascist) comrades in the Vienna
who were recently protesting Bush. One can only wonder why they were
too ashamed to reveal their true identities.
....Like that guy with electrodes alligator-clipped to his balls in Abu
Ghraib and prisoners whom have not been charged for 5 years at GITMO?
Oh well, that's typical for the Fascist left!
Oh my GOD! How DARE they protest? They don't have the RIGHT to protest!
Not against our Royal pain in the ***** king georgie iv!!!!!!!
Here's the article for your pleasure:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/eu/story/0,,1802742,00.html
LN
Sorry to disappoint you but I'm not into jerking off to Rightarded BS.
--
The PREMIER of "An Evening With a Rightard" Part one!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp4o_eHOKF8
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The Fascist Left Hound Bush for Defending America |
24 Jun 2006 02:18:17 PM |
|
|
"The PretZel" <sourdough@saltwithmustard.com> wrote in message
news:2006062323311443658-sourdough@saltwithmustardcom...
On 2006-06-22 12:49:57 -0700, <needham@syix.com> said:
"The PretZel" <sourdough@saltwithmustard.com> wrote in message
news:200606221140028930-sourdough@saltwithmustardcom...
On 2006-06-21 15:58:28 -0700, <needham@syix.com> said:
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2006/06/21/gitmo372.jpg
Any
questions?
LN
Is
that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld?
Surprising surprise, it's your leftist (Fascist) comrades in the Vienna
who were recently protesting Bush. One can only wonder why they were too
ashamed to reveal their true identities.
...Like that guy with electrodes alligator-clipped to his balls in Abu
Ghraib and prisoners whom have not been charged for 5 years at GITMO?
The very few low level personnel at Abu Ghrail (like England) are being
dealt with via the USMCJ. Furthermore, I notice how you liberals always
forget to include that it was the US military which initilized any
investigation there into prisoner treatment at Abu Ghrail. Why is that?
Also, I don't feel a bit sorry for murderous combatants wasting away at
GITMO consider the following undenibale facts:
-They ALL were caught while trying to kill Americans/Coilition forces IN
VIOLATION OF THE GENEVA CONVENTION.
-To this day, many of them attempt are still murderous thugs, some of
which were released and then returned to the battle to kill Americans, ONCE
AGAIN IN VIOLATION OF THE GENEVA CONVENTION!
Now can you be intellectually honest and admist these two UNDENIABLE FACTS?
I doubt it!
Oh well, that's typical for the Fascist left!
Oh my GOD! How DARE they protest? They don't have the RIGHT to protest!
Not against our Royal pain in the ***** king georgie iv!!!!!!!
Here's the article for your pleasure:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/eu/story/0,,1802742,00.html
LN
Sorry to disappoint you but I'm not into jerking off to Rightarded BS.
I understand that your daily mikey-moore suck job fills your cheeks!
LN
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
