| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Laura Bush murdered her boy friend" |
| Date: |
12 Jul 2004 05:36:08 PM |
| Object: |
The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
.
|
|
| User: "cLIeNUX user" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
12 Jul 2004 11:15:51 PM |
|
|
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
You're talking about what's legal, which is irrelevant to the Bushes. When
the elections are postponed, that is when the Bushes will have
successfully killed the USA.
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
The Responsible Party
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jingo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 09:32:06 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 04:15:51 -0000, r@cLIeNUX. (cLIeNUX user) wrote:
humbubba@smart.net
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
You're talking about what's legal, which is irrelevant to the Bushes. When
the elections are postponed, that is when the Bushes will have
successfully killed the USA.
***
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html
"Today, the day of choosing the electors is set at the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in November, and the date the Electors meet is
set at the first Monday following the second Wednesday in December...
These dates are set in the US Code, at 3 USC 7."
***
The GOP controlled Congress could change the dates if they so desired.
Jingo
***
"You guys want to hear this speech or not?"
--***** "Mr. Positive" Cheney when interupted by applause in Altoon, Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08DOWD.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 10:01:00 PM |
|
|
"Jingo" <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in message
news:0l69f0l286qcdtkj1iq3b85r7allacn3qs@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 04:15:51 -0000, r@cLIeNUX. (cLIeNUX user) wrote:
humbubba@smart.net
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
You're talking about what's legal, which is irrelevant to the Bushes.
When
the elections are postponed, that is when the Bushes will have
successfully killed the USA.
***
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html
"Today, the day of choosing the electors is set at the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in November, and the date the Electors meet is
set at the first Monday following the second Wednesday in December...
These dates are set in the US Code, at 3 USC 7."
***
The GOP controlled Congress could change the dates if they so desired.
There are still problems with the twelfth amendment, which sets the drop
dead condition to be if a president has not been elected either by the
electors or by congress by March 4 the vice president becomes president. It
would not take much in the way of election delays and suts before SCOTUS to
delay things that long.
Larry
Jingo
***
"You guys want to hear this speech or not?"
--***** "Mr. Positive" Cheney when interupted by applause in Altoon,
Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08DOWD.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 10:11:00 PM |
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cd276k$d63r$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jingo" <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in message
news:0l69f0l286qcdtkj1iq3b85r7allacn3qs@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 04:15:51 -0000, r@cLIeNUX. (cLIeNUX user) wrote:
humbubba@smart.net
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
You're talking about what's legal, which is irrelevant to the Bushes.
When
the elections are postponed, that is when the Bushes will have
successfully killed the USA.
***
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html
"Today, the day of choosing the electors is set at the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in November, and the date the Electors meet is
set at the first Monday following the second Wednesday in December...
These dates are set in the US Code, at 3 USC 7."
***
The GOP controlled Congress could change the dates if they so desired.
There are still problems with the twelfth amendment, which sets the drop
dead condition to be if a president has not been elected either by the
electors or by congress by March 4 the vice president becomes president.
It
would not take much in the way of election delays and suts before SCOTUS
to
delay things that long.
Larry
Another problem that slipped my mind. Many state constituions have dates for
the elections in them - Florida's date for certifying the electors was used
by SCOTUS to stop the recount. Since it is really an election of the states
there will be considerable difficulty gettng all of the kinks worked out.
Larry
Jingo
***
"You guys want to hear this speech or not?"
--***** "Mr. Positive" Cheney when interupted by applause in
Altoon,
Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08DOWD.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jingo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 10:56:40 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:01:00 -0400, "Larry Hewitt"
<larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote:
"Jingo" <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in message
news:0l69f0l286qcdtkj1iq3b85r7allacn3qs@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 04:15:51 -0000, r@cLIeNUX. (cLIeNUX user) wrote:
humbubba@smart.net
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
You're talking about what's legal, which is irrelevant to the Bushes.
When
the elections are postponed, that is when the Bushes will have
successfully killed the USA.
***
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html
"Today, the day of choosing the electors is set at the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in November, and the date the Electors meet is
set at the first Monday following the second Wednesday in December...
These dates are set in the US Code, at 3 USC 7."
***
The GOP controlled Congress could change the dates if they so desired.
There are still problems with the twelfth amendment, which sets the drop
dead condition to be if a president has not been elected either by the
electors or by congress by March 4 the vice president becomes president. It
would not take much in the way of election delays and suts before SCOTUS to
delay things that long.
So ***** Cheney then gets to really play President.
Do you see that as an improvement?
Jingo
***
"You guys want to hear this speech or not?"
--***** "Mr. Positive" Cheney when interupted by applause in Altoon, Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08DOWD.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 11:22:40 PM |
|
|
"Jingo" <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in message
news:amb9f0diuc6ep5qrfuok99ov656sfuh2e5@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:01:00 -0400, "Larry Hewitt"
<larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote:
"Jingo" <Jingo@AFreeAmerica.com> wrote in message
news:0l69f0l286qcdtkj1iq3b85r7allacn3qs@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 04:15:51 -0000, r@cLIeNUX. (cLIeNUX user) wrote:
humbubba@smart.net
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that.
There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential
election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
You're talking about what's legal, which is irrelevant to the Bushes.
When
the elections are postponed, that is when the Bushes will have
successfully killed the USA.
***
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html
"Today, the day of choosing the electors is set at the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in November, and the date the Electors meet is
set at the first Monday following the second Wednesday in December...
These dates are set in the US Code, at 3 USC 7."
***
The GOP controlled Congress could change the dates if they so desired.
There are still problems with the twelfth amendment, which sets the drop
dead condition to be if a president has not been elected either by the
electors or by congress by March 4 the vice president becomes president.
It
would not take much in the way of election delays and suts before SCOTUS
to
delay things that long.
So ***** Cheney then gets to really play President.
Do you see that as an improvement?
It is the worst possible outcome.
Larry
Jingo
***
"You guys want to hear this speech or not?"
--***** "Mr. Positive" Cheney when interupted by applause in Altoon,
Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08DOWD.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "McNeil" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 01:38:13 AM |
|
|
(Laura Bush murdered her boy friend) wrote in message news:<780ea958.0407121436.18f92d39@posting.google.com>...
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
This topic is long overdue, as controversial as it is.
People from the mideast that I worked with over twenty years ago
warned us that terrorism would eventually hit on our soil, and because
our country is so open, that it would be a major shock to the us...all
things would change.
And it did.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jay King" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 03:47:24 PM |
|
|
Actually when you vote in the preidential election you do NOT VOTE FOR
the electors in the elctoral college. The electors are chosen by
other means, usually not a vote, but appointed.
On 12 Jul 2004 15:36:08 -0700, (Laura Bush
murdered her boy friend) wrote:
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jingo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 09:36:29 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:47:24 GMT, Jay King <mrpolitics@cinci.rr.com>
wrote:
Actually when you vote in the preidential election you do NOT VOTE FOR
the electors in the elctoral college. The electors are chosen by
other means, usually not a vote, but appointed.
Wrong on all counts.
On 12 Jul 2004 15:36:08 -0700, (Laura Bush
murdered her boy friend) wrote:
And you can thank the much-maligned Electoral College for that. There
is no federal election for president. All you do is vote for your
state's electors to the electoral college. The presidential election
is entirely a state matter and barring a constitutional amendment,
Bushie cannot cancel or postpone the elections though he could, of
course, ask each state individually to do so.
***
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html
"Today, the day of choosing the electors is set at the first Tuesday
after the first Monday in November, and the date the Electors meet is
set at the first Monday following the second Wednesday in December...
These dates are set in the US Code, at 3 USC 7."
***
The GOP controlled Congress could change the dates if they so desired.
Jingo
***
"You guys want to hear this speech or not?"
--***** "Mr. Positive" Cheney when interupted by applause in Altoon, Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08DOWD.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PagCal" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 02:56:19 AM |
|
|
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
.
|
|
|
| User: "sparrow" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 11:17:02 AM |
|
|
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com...
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
Semiautos against Apaches. That oughta be fun. lol
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 11:20:11 AM |
|
|
"sparrow" <c-bee1@uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:cd12i3$scf$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com...
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
Semiautos against Apaches. That oughta be fun. lol
At about a thousand to one ratio :) Plus many
in the military would be sympathetic to the
cause.
.
|
|
|
| User: "sparrow" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 01:41:07 PM |
|
|
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:cYUIc.857$uU4.419@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"sparrow" <c-bee1@uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:cd12i3$scf$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com...
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in
America.
Semiautos against Apaches. That oughta be fun. lol
At about a thousand to one ratio :) Plus many
in the military would be sympathetic to the
cause.
Good point.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 01:54:36 PM |
|
|
"sparrow" <c-bee1@uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:cd1b0b$usb$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"Bob" <no@email.address> wrote in message
news:cYUIc.857$uU4.419@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
"sparrow" <c-bee1@uiuc.edu> wrote in message
news:cd12i3$scf$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu...
"PagCal" <pagcal@runbox.com> wrote in message
news:10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com...
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in
America.
Semiautos against Apaches. That oughta be fun. lol
At about a thousand to one ratio :) Plus many
in the military would be sympathetic to the
cause.
Good point.
Thank God for the 2nd Amendment :)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Qinff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 03:05:44 AM |
|
|
*****!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "cLIeNUX user" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 03:05:25 AM |
|
|
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
Hopefully starting with the Secret Service.
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
The Responsible Party
.
|
|
|
| User: "Qinff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 03:08:29 AM |
|
|
Secret Service Is A Bunch Of FAGGOTS!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lars Eighner" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 03:02:48 AM |
|
|
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
--
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/
"With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for projects,
I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them"
-- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 12:46:08 PM |
|
|
"Lars Eighner" <> wrote in message
news:slrncf75jq.hls.eighner@goodwill.io.com...
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in
America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
I wouldn;t quite say nothing. Tens (hundreds?) of thousands of us lined the
inaugural parade parade route, letting Bush know he was illegitimate. And we
were making his life miserable the first few months, until 9/11 happened and
we started getting death threats.
Larry
--
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code-
http://www.io.com/~eighner/
"With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for
projects,
I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them"
-- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman
.
|
|
|
| User: "My Pet Goat" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
21 Jul 2004 12:29:36 AM |
|
|
In article <cd16m8$cnco$1@news3.infoave.net>, says.=
...
=20
"Lars Eighner" < > wrote in message
news:slrncf75jq.hls.eighner@goodwill.io.com...
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in
America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
I wouldn;t quite say nothing. Tens (hundreds?) of thousands of us lined t=
he
inaugural parade parade route, letting Bush know he was illegitimate. And=
we
were making his life miserable the first few months, until 9/11 happened =
and
we started getting death threats.
=20
Larry
=20
--=20
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code-
http://www.io.com/~eighner/
"With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for
projects,
I think we can convince these people that we are here to help the=
m"
-- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman
=20
=20
=20
The Neocons would support the Bush coup d'=E9tat and rally
around the president. The media would parrot the spin of
the day. Neocons would say get over it. Bush would be=20
portrayed as a heroic leader who "temporarily" took=20
control in a time of crisis.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 01:08:47 PM |
|
|
Larry Hewitt wrote:
"Lars Eighner" < > wrote in message
news:slrncf75jq.hls.eighner@goodwill.io.com...
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in
America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
I wouldn;t quite say nothing. Tens (hundreds?) of thousands of us lined the
inaugural parade parade route, letting Bush know he was illegitimate. And we
were making his life miserable the first few months, until 9/11 happened and
we started getting death threats.
Bush won. Gore lost. Independent recounts back it up. Get over it
already.
Larry
--
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code-
http://www.io.com/~eighner/
"With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for
projects,
I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them"
-- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 01:35:41 PM |
|
|
"Geo" <geo@sdf.com> wrote in message news:40F4252F.10201@sdf.com...
Larry Hewitt wrote:
"Lars Eighner" < > wrote in message
news:slrncf75jq.hls.eighner@goodwill.io.com...
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in
America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
I wouldn;t quite say nothing. Tens (hundreds?) of thousands of us lined
the
inaugural parade parade route, letting Bush know he was illegitimate.
And we
were making his life miserable the first few months, until 9/11 happened
and
we started getting death threats.
Bush won. Gore lost. Independent recounts back it up. Get over it
already.
Bush didn;t win, he was appointed by SCOTUS. he lost Florida, he lost the
US. AS my nephew says, he is a squatter in the WH.
Larry
Larry
--
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code-
http://www.io.com/~eighner/
"With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for
projects,
I think we can convince these people that we are here to help
them"
-- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jingo" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 09:34:59 PM |
|
|
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:08:47 -0400, Geo <geo@sdf.com> wrote:
Larry Hewitt wrote:
"Lars Eighner" <eighner@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrncf75jq.hls.eighner@goodwill.io.com...
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in
America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
I wouldn;t quite say nothing. Tens (hundreds?) of thousands of us lined the
inaugural parade parade route, letting Bush know he was illegitimate. And we
were making his life miserable the first few months, until 9/11 happened and
we started getting death threats.
Bush won. Gore lost. Independent recounts back it up. Get over it
already.
Because well know net-kook Geo says so.
Jingo
***
"You guys want to hear this speech or not?"
--***** "Mr. Positive" Cheney when interupted by applause in Altoon, Pennsylvania
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/08/opinion/08DOWD.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fOp%2dEd%2fColumnists
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 09:39:51 AM |
|
|
"Lars Eighner" <eighner@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrncf75jq.hls.eighner@goodwill.io.com...
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
Why should they?
.
|
|
|
| User: "My Pet Goat" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
21 Jul 2004 12:23:55 AM |
|
|
In article <0vSIc.89$xH1.8@bignews1.bellsouth.net>, no@email.address says...
"Lars Eighner" <eighner@io.com> wrote in message
news:slrncf75jq.hls.eighner@goodwill.io.com...
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
Why should they?
In the old days, the honorable thing to do would be to
allow a recount so that the will of the people prevailed.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Docky Wocky" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
21 Jul 2004 07:29:12 AM |
|
|
goat sez:
"In the old days, the honorable thing to do would be to
allow a recount so that the will of the people prevailed..."
_________________________________________
(Yawn!)
Just how many recounts do you figure it would have taken to get Algore a
job?
Since the Berger revelation exposed another well-used Democrat method, how
many Bush ballots would you estimate your Demmy poll pals slipped into their
pants?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Qinff" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 03:06:00 AM |
|
|
*****!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "cLIeNUX user" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 03:10:44 AM |
|
|
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
That was a close call. Completely killing democracy won't be, nor will the
backlash.
Bush can't admit the truth. He can't even stick to a promise not to post
in alt.politics. He is the stupidest member of a family of murderous
thugs. He's probably going to insist on going down hard. He doesn't have
military support except for a handful of Pentagon butt-boys. Pass the
popcorn.
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee
The Responsible Party
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- http://www.io.com/~eighner/
"With a heavy dose of fear and violence, and a lot of money for projects,
I think we can convince these people that we are here to help them"
-- Lt. Col. Nathan Sassaman
.
|
|
|
| User: "aha c" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 04:32:05 AM |
|
|
"Qinff" <Qinff@@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:HOMIc.56460$qw1.46826@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
*****!
well,neanderthals are still alive i see....
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chris the Liberal" |
|
| Title: Re: The Federal govt CANNOT cancel the elections |
13 Jul 2004 08:29:25 PM |
|
|
Lars Eighner <eighner@io.com> wrote in message news:<slrncf75jq.hls.eighner@goodwill.io.com>...
In our last episode,
<10f75d3cidcgg70@corp.supernews.com>,
the lovely and talented PagCal
broadcast on alt.politics:
If Bush tried to seize power in a coup, there'd be open revolt in America.
I don't know. He managed to get in office with the help of the
Supreme Court and no one did anything about that.
Yeah, I thought with all their talk of overthrowing a tyrant
as justification for keeping their guns that the National Rifle
Association would present arms and run to Washington after the
Supreme Court decision. But they turned out to be wusses.
I predict, given the slightest excuse, the Bush administation
will delay elections for 6 months. At that time, Republicans
will say -- what the Hell, he's already in the White House, why
bother with elections?? Rush Limbaugh will second the motion
and it will be a done deal.
Who knows WHEN we would have another election; at my age, I may
have voted for the last time.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
