Politics > Politics-USA > The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative!
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
18 Mar 2007 01:09:26 PM |
| Object: |
The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
Yes, my friends, be very wary when dealing with him. Sure, he might
be offering your country some money. But at what price? The loss of
your sovereignity, your way of life, your politics? That would be a
very, very high cost to pay (his blood money) just so he can get a
foothold into your country.
He will also try to squash the legal crops of marijuana and the coca
plant when his scavengers come into your country, further squashing
your sovreignity and right to determine the type of life best for your
countrymen and women.
Also, you have to think about what it will mean to your neighbors in
the continent as well. As has been shown by the Bush regimes sinful
and unjust forays into Iraq and Afghanistan, he is always up to no
good.
So, be very careful of his true intentions for your country. He is
surely up to no good.
Sincerely, your brother in arms,
.
|
|
| User: "Evil" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
18 Mar 2007 10:22:23 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 1:09 pm, wrote:
Yes, my friends, be very wary when dealing with him. Sure, he might
be offering your country some money. But at what price? The loss of
your sovereignity, your way of life, your politics? That would be a
very, very high cost to pay (his blood money) just so he can get a
foothold into your country.
He will also try to squash the legal crops of marijuana and the coca
plant when his scavengers come into your country, further squashing
your sovreignity and right to determine the type of life best for your
countrymen and women.
Also, you have to think about what it will mean to your neighbors in
the continent as well. As has been shown by the Bush regimes sinful
and unjust forays into Iraq and Afghanistan, he is always up to no
good.
So, be very careful of his true intentions for your country. He is
surely up to no good.
Sincerely, your brother in arms,
Por que es columbia la tierra de columna? No es Colombia la tierra de
Colon y la capital es Santa Fe de Bogota. Si quiere dicir algo de
Colombia escriba bien el nombre del pais.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
20 Mar 2007 03:42:35 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 11:22 pm, "Evil" <enki...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 1:09 pm, wrote:
Yes, my friends, be very wary when dealing with him. Sure, he might
be offering your country some money. But at what price? The loss of
your sovereignity, your way of life, your politics? That would be a
very, very high cost to pay (his blood money) just so he can get a
foothold into your country.
He will also try to squash the legal crops of marijuana and the coca
plant when his scavengers come into your country, further squashing
your sovreignity and right to determine the type of life best for your
countrymen and women.
Also, you have to think about what it will mean to your neighbors in
the continent as well. As has been shown by the Bush regimes sinful
and unjust forays into Iraq and Afghanistan, he is always up to no
good.
So, be very careful of his true intentions for your country. He is
surely up to no good.
Sincerely, your brother in arms,
Por que es columbia la tierra de columna? No es Colombia la tierra de
Colon y la capital es Santa Fe de Bogota. Si quiere dicir algo de
Colombia escriba bien el nombre del pais.
=A1Largo vive un Colombia libre de los dictados del demented a
presidente de los E.E.U.U. - GW Bush!
=A1Desea vivo el pa=EDs noble de Colombia! =A1Mate a cualquier interlopers
americano que no sea turistas!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Goldstein" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
18 Mar 2007 01:51:49 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 1:09 pm, wrote:
Yes, my friends, be very wary when dealing with him. Sure, he might
be offering your country some money. But at what price? The loss of
your sovereignity, your way of life, your politics? That would be a
very, very high cost to pay (his blood money) just so he can get a
foothold into your country.
He will also try to squash the legal crops of marijuana and the coca
plant when his scavengers come into your country, further squashing
your sovreignity and right to determine the type of life best for your
countrymen and women.
Also, you have to think about what it will mean to your neighbors in
the continent as well. As has been shown by the Bush regimes sinful
and unjust forays into Iraq and Afghanistan, he is always up to no
good.
So, be very careful of his true intentions for your country. He is
surely up to no good.
Sincerely, your brother in arms,
You are making the assumption that the US is worse than the FARC, ELN
and AUC which are serious threats to the sovereignty of Colombia.
These groups are responsible for chaos and death that displace a large
percent of the population. The people of Colombia want all the help
they can get so they can have their country back and go back to their
homes and farms.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugo S. Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
18 Mar 2007 04:28:36 PM |
|
|
On 18 Mar 2007 11:51:49 -0700, "Goldstein" <enki034@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 1:09 pm, wrote:
Yes, my friends, be very wary when dealing with him. Sure, he might
be offering your country some money. But at what price? The loss of
your sovereignity, your way of life, your politics? That would be a
very, very high cost to pay (his blood money) just so he can get a
foothold into your country.
He will also try to squash the legal crops of marijuana and the coca
plant when his scavengers come into your country, further squashing
your sovreignity and right to determine the type of life best for your
countrymen and women.
[...]
You are making the assumption that the US is worse than the FARC, ELN
and AUC which are serious threats to the sovereignty of Colombia.
These groups are responsible for chaos and death that displace a large
percent of the population. The people of Colombia want all the help
they can get so they can have their country back and go back to their
homes and farms.
Although FARC is as evil as you say, setting up kidnapping as a
full-scale industry, they have been empowered by US Drug Warriors, who
pump billions of dollars of black-market super-profits each year into
the most vicious elements of Colombian society.
After the USA repealed Alcohol Prohibition in 1933, the homicide rate
fell by 40%.
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/homrate1.htm
Although our current President seems to be unteachable, perhaps the
next one might be willing to learn from past national successes.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
.
|
|
|
| User: "Goldstein" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
18 Mar 2007 06:03:49 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 4:28 pm, Hugo S. Cunningham <checkwebs...@cyberussr.com>
wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 11:51:49 -0700, "Goldstein" <enki...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 1:09 pm, wrote:
Yes, my friends, be very wary when dealing with him. Sure, he might
be offering your country some money. But at what price? The loss of
your sovereignity, your way of life, your politics? That would be a
very, very high cost to pay (his blood money) just so he can get a
foothold into your country.
He will also try to squash the legal crops of marijuana and the coca
plant when his scavengers come into your country, further squashing
your sovreignity and right to determine the type of life best for your
countrymen and women.
[...]
You are making the assumption that the US is worse than the FARC, ELN
and AUC which are serious threats to the sovereignty of Colombia.
These groups are responsible for chaos and death that displace a large
percent of the population. The people of Colombia want all the help
they can get so they can have their country back and go back to their
homes and farms.
Although FARC is as evil as you say, setting up kidnapping as a
full-scale industry, they have been empowered by US Drug Warriors, who
pump billions of dollars of black-market super-profits each year into
the most vicious elements of Colombian society.
After the USA repealed Alcohol Prohibition in 1933, the homicide rate
fell by 40%.http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/homrate1.htm
Although our current President seems to be unteachable, perhaps the
next one might be willing to learn from past national successes.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
Yes, the cocaine trade has give the FARC and AUC a large source of
revenue. I have never used cocaine nor plan to. I am not giving them
money. Our country has not made the choice to legalize dangerous
drugs and if we did it would not be the end of the insurgency. It
started in 1966 and survived the cold war and did not get heavily into
Cocaine until the mid 90s. The criminalization of drugs is a
spurious argument, the will fund their war with any means at their
disposal. Still Dole and Chiquita cut their ties with the AUC who
sold them bananas. They come in with force and make all businesses
bay a tax to operate weather it be coffee, bananas or Coca paste. You
can't discount the help they get Venezuela because they have similar
objectives. The fighting and the war in Colombia is over much more
than cocaine and has much deeper roots.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugo S. Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
18 Mar 2007 10:48:10 PM |
|
|
On 18 Mar 2007 16:03:49 -0700, "Goldstein" <enki034@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 4:28 pm, Hugo S. Cunningham <checkwebs...@cyberussr.com>
wrote:
[...]
Although FARC is as evil as you say, setting up kidnapping as a
full-scale industry, they have been empowered by US Drug Warriors, who
pump billions of dollars of black-market super-profits each year into
the most vicious elements of Colombian society.
After the USA repealed Alcohol Prohibition in 1933, the homicide rate
fell by 40%.http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/homrate1.htm
Although our current President seems to be unteachable, perhaps the
next one might be willing to learn from past national successes.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
Yes, the cocaine trade has give the FARC and AUC a large source of
revenue. I have never used cocaine nor plan to. I am not giving them
money. Our country has not made the choice to legalize dangerous
drugs
Wrong. We legalized alcohol in 1933, even though it is as dangerous
(or more so) than most of the ones still illegal. We decided,
correctly, that the Prohibitionist cure was worse than the alcohol
disease.
and if we did it would not be the end of the insurgency. It
started in 1966 and survived the cold war
mostly on black-market drug super-profits
and did not get heavily into
Cocaine until the mid 90s.
ie after the end of the Cold War closed Fidel's bank account.
The criminalization of drugs is a
spurious argument, the will fund their war with any means at their
disposal.
Similar arguments were made against repeal of Alcohol Prohibition --
that gangsters would go into new lines of business. They did, but the
damage (shown by the homicide rate) still fell sharply.
Still Dole and Chiquita cut their ties with the AUC who
sold them bananas. They come in with force and make all businesses
bay a tax to operate weather it be coffee, bananas or Coca paste. You
can't discount the help they get Venezuela because they have similar
objectives.
True. One thing they have *stopped* doing since Hugo Chavez became a
factor is blowing up oil pipelines. The obvious way for Colombia to
retaliate would not be to the Comandante's taste.
The fighting and the war in Colombia is over much more
than cocaine and has much deeper roots.
Nevertheless, cutting out the single most poisonous root is a good way
to start.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
.
|
|
|
| User: "JoeC" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
19 Mar 2007 11:51:21 AM |
|
|
--Hugo S. Cunningham
Yes, the cocaine trade has give the FARC and AUC a large source of
revenue. I have never used cocaine nor plan to. I am not giving them
money. Our country has not made the choice to legalize dangerous
drugs
Wrong. We legalized alcohol in 1933, even though it is as dangerous
(or more so) than most of the ones still illegal. We decided,
correctly, that the Prohibitionist cure was worse than the alcohol
disease.
Still because prohibition was happened organized crime got a big boot
from the laws of the time. The mob didn't go away when prohibition
ended. It used the time to grow and become more powerfu when alcohol
became legal organized crime found other sources of revenue. We have
not made the decision as a society to allow dangerous substances to be
consumed unchecked. We have regulations on the safety and
healthfulness of products. Lawsuits would quickly take such drugs off
the market because of deaths and overdose.
We are far from a Libertarian society and we have a long way to go and
too may financial incentives to keep if it from going that way. If
cocaine and heroin were legalized then we would have to end all public
funding for medicine and allow hospitals to turn away patients who
could not pay. Our health is our responsibility and why should others
pay of us not taking care of ourselves.
and if we did it would not be the end of the insurgency. It
started in 1966 and survived the cold war
mostly on black-market drug super-profits
There are other factors in Colombia such as government oppression and
lawlessness. Crime did become big on cocaine but there are also
cartels of coffee and ranching as well as other industries.
and did not get heavily into
Cocaine until the mid 90s.
ie after the end of the Cold War closed Fidel's bank account.
Today we have Hugo Chavez and his oil money propping up Cuba and
giving undetermined support to the FARC.
The criminalization of drugs is a
spurious argument, the will fund their war with any means at their
disposal.
Similar arguments were made against repeal of Alcohol Prohibition --
that gangsters would go into new lines of business. They did, but the
damage (shown by the homicide rate) still fell sharply.
Again we have not made the choice to allow these dangerous and
destructive drugs to be openly used in our country.
Still Dole and Chiquita cut their ties with the AUC who
sold them bananas. They come in with force and make all businesses
pay a tax to operate weather it be coffee, bananas or Coca paste. You
can't discount the help they get Venezuela because they have similar
objectives.
True. One thing they have *stopped* doing since Hugo Chavez became a
factor is blowing up oil pipelines. The obvious way for Colombia to
retaliate would not be to the Comandante's taste.
You loose me here. The AUC is being demobilized by force and the ELN
is in peace negotiations with the government. The FARC is on the
defensive since the offensives in the Departments of Putumayo Caqueta
and Meta as well as the Macarena regions of Colombia. Another major
factor in the decline of the FARC was taking back as the "distencion
zone" and San Vicente de Caiguan. That took away an Ireland sized
base of operations as well. The FARC is still large and powerful with
more that 12,000 fighters and other personnel.
They existed before cocaine was a large sources of income and it will
find other sources of income if Cocaine is ever legal. They will just
legally control the production that already exists and force out any
competitors.
The fighting and the war in Colombia is over much more
than cocaine and has much deeper roots.
Nevertheless, cutting out the single most poisonous root is a good way
to start.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
We will never know the military offensives and the peace offerings are
having an effect. Many high level FARC leaders and associates have
been captured and killed over the past few years. Negotiations and
appeasement has only allowed it to grow only force and confrontation
has had any affect against the insurgency. The FARC is very unpopular
and the President Uribe is very popular because of their actions. The
people of Colombia want their country back and the FARC is the main
force taking it from them.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Hugo S. Cunningham" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
24 Mar 2007 11:07:47 PM |
|
|
On 19 Mar 2007 09:51:21 -0700, "JoeC" <enki034@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes, the cocaine trade has give the FARC and AUC a large source of
revenue. I have never used cocaine nor plan to. I am not giving them
money. Our country has not made the choice to legalize dangerous
drugs
Wrong. We legalized alcohol in 1933, even though it is as dangerous
(or more so) than most of the ones still illegal. We decided,
correctly, that the Prohibitionist cure was worse than the alcohol
disease.
Still because prohibition was happened organized crime got a big boot
"boot" or "boost"?
from the laws of the time. The mob didn't go away when prohibition
ended. It used the time to grow and become more powerfu when alcohol
became legal organized crime found other sources of revenue.
True, but, as I mentioned before, the homicide rate fell by 40%. The
mob's reach was reduced.
We have
not made the decision as a society to allow dangerous substances to be
consumed unchecked.
There are intermediate stages between total bans (that empower
gangsters) and total legalization. Legal alcohol sellers, for
example, have an incentive to obey laws against selling to children;
the alternative is losing lucrative licences to sell to adults. In
contrast, there are no special disintives to shield children from
sales of illegal drugs.
We have regulations on the safety and
healthfulness of products. Lawsuits would quickly take such drugs off
the market because of deaths and overdose.
Overdose deaths from taking illegal drugs are overwhelmingly, caused
by their illegal status -- no standardization or oversight. Alcohol,
as dangerous as any illegal drug, has not been driven off the market
by lawsuits.
We are far from a Libertarian society
I am not a libertarian myself (eg I hold centrist views on tax policy,
and the mixed economy in general).
Nevertheless, our steps back from libertarian reasoning under G.W.
Bush's "Big government conservatism" coincide with the most dizzying
decline in US security since the 1930s.
Our fathers and grandfathers fought and died against big government
conservatism for good reason.
and we have a long way to go and
too may financial incentives to keep if it from going that way. If
cocaine and heroin were legalized then we would have to end all public
funding for medicine and allow hospitals to turn away patients who
could not pay.
Huh? Please explain.
Our health is our responsibility and why should others
pay of us not taking care of ourselves.
Crime fostered by Prohibition is a leading cause of the collapse of
neighborhoods. Switzerland has experimented with heroin maintenance
and found that among those enrolled, gainful employment goes up while
crime and dependency go down.
and if we did it would not be the end of the insurgency. It
started in 1966 and survived the cold war
mostly on black-market drug super-profits
There are other factors in Colombia such as government oppression and
lawlessness. Crime did become big on cocaine but there are also
cartels of coffee and ranching as well as other industries.
Black-market drug super-profits are by far the biggest source. The
poison supports not just left-wing insurgents, but also apolitical
criminals, eg the "Medellin cartel."
and did not get heavily into
Cocaine until the mid 90s.
ie after the end of the Cold War closed Fidel's bank account.
Today we have Hugo Chavez and his oil money propping up Cuba and
giving undetermined support to the FARC.
Agreed.
[...]
Still Dole and Chiquita cut their ties with the AUC who
sold them bananas. They come in with force and make all businesses
pay a tax to operate weather it be coffee, bananas or Coca paste. You
can't discount the help they get Venezuela because they have similar
objectives.
True. One thing they have *stopped* doing since Hugo Chavez became a
factor is blowing up oil pipelines. The obvious way for Colombia to
retaliate would not be to the Comandante's taste.
You loose me here.
Why? Are you denying that they blew up Colombian oil pipelines in the
past? Or do you claim they are still blowing up Colombian oil
pipelines?
The AUC is being demobilized by force and the ELN
is in peace negotiations with the government. The FARC is on the
defensive since the offensives in the Departments of Putumayo Caqueta
and Meta as well as the Macarena regions of Colombia. Another major
factor in the decline of the FARC was taking back as the "distencion
zone" and San Vicente de Caiguan. That took away an Ireland sized
base of operations as well. The FARC is still large and powerful with
more that 12,000 fighters and other personnel.
They existed before cocaine was a large sources of income
But there was a period between the Soviet collapse in 1992 and
Chavez's accession in 1998 when a sensible US drug policy would have
damaged them permanently.
and it will
find other sources of income if Cocaine is ever legal. They will just
legally control the production that already exists and force out any
competitors.
Nonsense. If they jack up the price of a legal substance, it can be
imported from elsewhere. World supplies are not inelastic like oil.
[...]
We will never know the military offensives and the peace offerings are
having an effect. Many high level FARC leaders and associates have
been captured and killed over the past few years. Negotiations and
appeasement has only allowed it to grow only force and confrontation
has had any affect against the insurgency. The FARC is very unpopular
and the President Uribe is very popular because of their actions. The
people of Colombia want their country back and the FARC is the main
force taking it from them.
I agree with you here. The single most useful contribution we could
make to Colombia, however, is to cut off drug superprofits.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
20 Mar 2007 03:46:30 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 11:48 pm, Hugo S. Cunningham <checkwebs...@cyberussr.com>
wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 16:03:49 -0700, "Goldstein" <enki...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 4:28 pm, Hugo S. Cunningham <checkwebs...@cyberussr.com>
wrote:
[...]
Although FARC is as evil as you say, setting up kidnapping as a
full-scale industry, they have been empowered by US Drug Warriors, who
pump billions of dollars of black-market super-profits each year into
the most vicious elements of Colombian society.
After the USA repealed Alcohol Prohibition in 1933, the homicide rate
fell by 40%.http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/homrate1.htm
Although our current President seems to be unteachable, perhaps the
next one might be willing to learn from past national successes.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
Yes, the cocaine trade has give the FARC and AUC a large source of
revenue. I have never used cocaine nor plan to. I am not giving them
money. Our country has not made the choice to legalize dangerous
drugs
Wrong. We legalized alcohol in 1933, even though it is as dangerous
(or more so) than most of the ones still illegal. We decided,
correctly, that the Prohibitionist cure was worse than the alcohol
disease.
and if we did it would not be the end of the insurgency. It
started in 1966 and survived the cold war
mostly on black-market drug super-profits
and did not get heavily into
Cocaine until the mid 90s.
ie after the end of the Cold War closed Fidel's bank account.
The criminalization of drugs is a
spurious argument, the will fund their war with any means at their
disposal.
Similar arguments were made against repeal of Alcohol Prohibition --
that gangsters would go into new lines of business. They did, but the
damage (shown by the homicide rate) still fell sharply.
Still Dole and Chiquita cut their ties with the AUC who
sold them bananas. They come in with force and make all businesses
bay a tax to operate weather it be coffee, bananas or Coca paste. You
can't discount the help they get Venezuela because they have similar
objectives.
True. One thing they have *stopped* doing since Hugo Chavez became a
factor is blowing up oil pipelines. The obvious way for Colombia to
retaliate would not be to the Comandante's taste.
The fighting and the war in Colombia is over much more
than cocaine and has much deeper roots.
Nevertheless, cutting out the single most poisonous root is a good way
to start.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
the United States of AmeriKKKKa is not supposed to be involved in ANY
coups. We all saw that to be untrue though, with the expansionist and
imperialist moves into Iraq and Afghanistan - all to install Bush's
brand of 'demoKKKKracy'.
And, just as many call for 'destablizing' (another word for 'murder')
Chavez, there are quite a few people in Venezuela who feel it would
not be such a bad thing were GWBush neutralized. In such a game,
those who play it on one side may well become victims of it
themselves..........
=A1Desea vivo el pa=EDs noble de Colombia! =A1Mate a cualquier interlopers
americano que no sea turistas!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
20 Mar 2007 03:37:38 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 7:03 pm, "Goldstein" <enki...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 4:28 pm, Hugo S. Cunningham <checkwebs...@cyberussr.com>
wrote:
On 18 Mar 2007 11:51:49 -0700, "Goldstein" <enki...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 1:09 pm, wrote:
Yes, my friends, be very wary when dealing with him. Sure, he might
be offering your country some money. But at what price? The loss of
your sovereignity, your way of life, your politics? That would be a
very, very high cost to pay (his blood money) just so he can get a
foothold into your country.
He will also try to squash the legal crops of marijuana and the coca
plant when his scavengers come into your country, further squashing
your sovreignity and right to determine the type of life best for your
countrymen and women.
[...]
You are making the assumption that the US is worse than the FARC, ELN
and AUC which are serious threats to the sovereignty of Colombia.
These groups are responsible for chaos and death that displace a large
percent of the population. The people of Colombia want all the help
they can get so they can have their country back and go back to their
homes and farms.
Although FARC is as evil as you say, setting up kidnapping as a
full-scale industry, they have been empowered by US Drug Warriors, who
pump billions of dollars of black-market super-profits each year into
the most vicious elements of Colombian society.
After the USA repealed Alcohol Prohibition in 1933, the homicide rate
fell by 40%.http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Library/homrate1.htm
Although our current President seems to be unteachable, perhaps the
next one might be willing to learn from past national successes.
--Hugo S. Cunningham
Yes, the cocaine trade has give the FARC and AUC a large source of
revenue. I have never used cocaine nor plan to.
goldstein...you are just a momma's boy, although she has been dead and
cold for many years. now you worship false idols.....the evil Bush
administration. That would make 3 evil empires we have had and that
you have sinfully worshipped - Ronald Reagan's, George HW Bush's and
now GW Bush!
I am not giving them
money. Our country has not made the choice to legalize dangerous
drugs and if we did it would not be the end of the insurgency. It
started in 1966 and survived the cold war and did not get heavily into
Cocaine until the mid 90s. The criminalization of drugs is a
spurious argument, the will fund their war with any means at their
disposal. Still Dole and Chiquita cut their ties with the AUC who
sold them bananas. They come in with force and make all businesses
bay a tax to operate weather it be coffee, bananas or Coca paste. You
can't discount the help they get Venezuela because they have similar
objectives. The fighting and the war in Colombia is over much more
than cocaine and has much deeper roots.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The fine people of Columbia should be very careful of the most recent GW Bush initiative! |
20 Mar 2007 03:35:11 PM |
|
|
On Mar 18, 2:51 pm, "Goldstein" <enki...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Mar 18, 1:09 pm, wrote:
Yes, my friends, be very wary when dealing with him. Sure, he might
be offering your country some money. But at what price? The loss of
your sovereignity, your way of life, your politics? That would be a
very, very high cost to pay (his blood money) just so he can get a
foothold into your country.
He will also try to squash the legal crops of marijuana and the coca
plant when his scavengers come into your country, further squashing
your sovreignity and right to determine the type of life best for your
countrymen and women.
Also, you have to think about what it will mean to your neighbors in
the continent as well. As has been shown by the Bush regimes sinful
and unjust forays into Iraq and Afghanistan, he is always up to no
good.
So, be very careful of his true intentions for your country. He is
surely up to no good.
Sincerely, your brother in arms,
You are making the assumption that the US is worse than the FARC, ELN
and AUC which are serious threats to the sovereignty of Colombia.
These groups are responsible for chaos and death that displace a large
percent of the population. The people of Colombia want all the help
they can get so they can have their country back and go back to their
homes and farms.
I am not making any kind of assumption at all, my good friend. No
matter what goes on in those countries (and there is ALWAYS some sort
of upheaval in ANY country) - as witness AG Gonzale's woes and Harriet
Miers offer to be 'interviewed' but not under oath...wonder what SHE
has to hide in all this, nothing could be worse for those countries
south of the United States to allow GW Bush's brand of AmeriKKKKan
'demoKKKKacy' to taint those wonderful nations.
Yeah...Bush is a loser. I am just telling those people to be very,
very, VERY wary of him and his entourage!
Che Guevera (the coup junta performed by those who ruled AmeriKKKKa at
that time, and any Western nation that was their 'partner in
crime').....never let that lesson be lost on the inhabitants of those
countries.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
