The Nameless War - Epilogue



 Politics > Politics-USA > The Nameless War - Epilogue

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Mr. Lionel P. Da Silva"
Date: 03 Nov 2007 10:55:13 PM
Object: The Nameless War - Epilogue
[Illuminati, Freemason, Zionism, nazi, racism, fascism, Lucifer, satan, 666, NWO, Skull and Bones]
I shall always be grateful to the many Members who made my return
to the House very much easier than it might have been, by their
immediate greetings and friendly attitude.
Many, I fear, whose actions in the Chamber itself and outside were
detected or reported to the press representatives, found themselves the
victims of a vendetta inside their constituencies and in the Press on
that specific account.
When we reflect upon these bloody happenings from the time of King
Charles I to our own day, we can at long last find only one cause for
satisfaction, if such a word can be in any way appropriate. It is that
for the first time we can now trace the underlying influences, which
explain these hideous disfigurations in European history.
In the light of present-day knowledge, we can now recognise and
understand the true significance of these terrible happenings. Instead
of mere disconnected occurrences, we can now discern the merciless
working of a satanic plan; and seeing and understanding, we are in a
position to take steps in the future to safeguard all those values,
which we love and stand for; and which that plan clearly seeks to destroy.
We can at last begin to oppose the planners and operators of that
plan, knowing about it and their technique, which till now have been
known to them alone. In other words, being fore-warned, it is our fault
if we are not fore-armed.
Let us not forget such words as those of the Jew Marcus Eli Ravage,
who wrote in the /*Century Magazine*/ U.S.A. in January 1928:
"We have stood back of, not only the last war, but all your wars;
and not only the Russian, but all of your revolutions worthy of
mention in your history."
Nor should we forget those of Professor Harold Laski, writing in
the */New Statesman and Nation /*on 11th January, 1942:
"For this war is in its essence merely an immense revolution in
which the war of 1914, the Russian Revolution, and the counter
revolutions on the Continent are earlier phases."
Nor the warning from that eminent Jewish American Attorney,
publisher and reporter, Henry Klein, issued only last year:
" The Protocols is the plan by which a handful of Jews, who compose
the Sanhedrin, aim to rule the world by first destroying Christian
civilisation."
"Not only are the Protocols genuine, in my opinion, but they have
been almost entirely fulfilled."
They have indeed been largely fulfilled; no small measure of Jewish
thanks being due to Mr. Roosevelt and his "ardent lieutenant," the
self-styled "architect of the Jewish future."
In the process, however, Britain and her Empire and, worse still,
her good name and honour have been brought down to the dust. As
Professor Beard wrote:
"The noble principles of the Four Freedoms and the Atlantic Charter
were for practical purposes discarded in the settlements which
accompanied the progress and followed the conclusion of the war. In
the validity of this statement the treatment of the people of
Esthonia, Lithuania, Poland, Roumania, Yugoslavia, China,
Indo-China, Indonesia, Italy, Germany and other places of the earth
bear witness."
There appeared recently in the press the cry of Mrs. chiang Kai
Shek calling Britain a "moral weakling" (in reference to China). She is
reported as saying:
"Britain has bartered the soul of a nation for a few pieces of
silver. . . One day these pieces of silver will bear interest in
British blood, toil, sweat and tears on the battleground of freedom."
It might be General Sikorski himself speaking, might it not? In the same
paper I saw that Mr. Jackson Martindell, president of the American
Institute of Management, has declared that,
"an Englishman's word is no longer his bond".
How often have I heard this from Arab sources since 1939? Mr.
Martindell continued,
"I hate to say this, but Britain is becoming poor morally as well as
economically."
From Poland to Palestine and to China these words are re-echoed,
and be it said, reiterated by the Jew-wise section of this country for
many years.
The reason is not far to seek. No man can serve two masters, more
especially when the principles and interests of these two masters are as
widely divergent as are those of Britain and her Empire, and Jewry and
their Empire, the U.S.S.R.
Ever since the fall of Mr. Chamberlain's Government, the interests
of the Jewish Empire have been advanced as prodigiously as those of
Britain and her Empire have been eclipsed.
Stranger than all this -- should any dare to state the truth in
plain terms-the only response is an accusation of anti-Semitism. As Mr.
Douglas Reed has clearly shown, the term "anti-Semitism" is meaningless
rubbish -- and as he suggests it might as well be called "anti-Semolina."
The Arabs are Semites, and no so-called "anti-Semite" is anti-Arab.
It is not even correct to say that he is anti-Jew. On the contrary,
he knows better than the uninformed that a fair proportion of Jews are
not engaged in this conspiracy.
The only correct term for the mis-called "anti-Semitic" is
"Jew-wise". It is indeed the only fair and honest term.
The phrase "anti-Semite" is merely a propaganda word used to
stampede the unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from
their minds without examination: so long as that is tolerated these
evils will not only continue, but grow worse.
The "Jew-wise" know that we have in Britain a Jewish "Imperium in
Imperio," which, in spite of all protestations and camouflage, is Jewish
first and foremost, and in complete unison with the remainder of World
Jewry. If any doubt this they need only read */Unity in Dispersion/*,
issued in 1948 by the World Jewish Congress, which proclaims Jewry to be
one nation.
Not all Jews here wish to be railroaded into this narrow social
tyranny; but unless this country affords them some way of escape they
dare not take the risks -- very grave risks -- of defying it: and so
they perforce co-operate to some degree.
Even worse, certain Gentiles with no good excuse support this
united force, which is in turn used to influence or control our
political parties, home and foreign policies, press and public life.
This unholy united front must be exposed and frustrated. One step
towards this objective would seem to be firstly an enactment to prevent
Gentile Esaus from lending their hands for the carrying out of orders
uttered by the voice of Jewish Jacobs.
Another: the detachment from the Jewish United Front of Jews, who
do not wish to subscribe to the dictates of the World Jewish Congress.
First and foremost however is the need to inform people of good will as
to the truth of this matter, particularly in regard to the real anatomy,
aims, and methods of the Marxist enemy.
It is to that end, that I humbly offer the contents of this book to
all, who are determined to fight Communism.
http://iamthewitness.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Upper-class skinny-dips freely (Bohemian Grove; Kennedys,
Rockefellers, CCNS Supt. L. Hadley, G. Schultz,
Edwin Meese III et al),
http://www.naturist.com/N/cws2.htm
The Bohemian Grove is a 2700 acre redwood forest,
located in Monte Rio, CA.
It contains accommodation for 2000 people to "camp"
in luxury. It is owned by the Bohemian Club.
SEMINAR TOPICS Major issues on the world scene, "opportunities"
upcoming, presentations by the most influential members of
government, the presidents, the supreme court justices, the
congressmen, an other top brass worldwide, regarding the
newly developed strategies and world events to unfold in the
nearest future.
Basically, all major world events including the issues of Iraq,
the Middle East, "New World Order", "War on terrorism",
world energy supply, "revolution" in military technology,
and, basically, all the world events as they unfold right now,
were already presented YEARS ahead of events.
July 11, 1997 Speaker: Ambassador James Woolsey
former CIA Director.
"Rogues, Terrorists and Two Weimars Redux:
National Security in the Next Century"
July 25, 1997 Speaker: Antonin Scalia, Justice
Supreme Court
July 26, 1997 Speaker: Donald Rumsfeld
Some talks in 1991, the time of NWO proclamation
by Bush:
Elliot Richardson, Nixon & Reagan Administrations
Subject: "Defining a New World Order"
John Lehman, Secretary of the Navy,
Reagan Administration
Subject: "Smart Weapons"
So, this "terrorism" thing was already being planned
back in at least 1997 in the Illuminati and Freemason
circles in their Bohemian Grove estate.
"The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media."
--- Former CIA Director William Colby
When asked in a 1976 interview whether the CIA had ever told its
media agents what to write, William Colby replied,
"Oh, sure, all the time."
[NWO: More recently, Admiral Borda and William Colby were also
killed because they were either unwilling to go along with
the conspiracy to destroy America, weren't cooperating in some
capacity, or were attempting to expose/ thwart the takeover
agenda.]
.

 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER