[Illuminati, Freemason, Zionism, nazi, racism, fascism, Lucifer, satan, 666, NWO, Skull and Bones]
In my Statement to the Speaker and Members of the House of Commons
concerning my detention (see Appendix 1) I summed up at the end of Part
1, the considerations which led me to inspect the secret U.S. Embassy
papers at Mr. Tyler Kent's flat in the last weeks of Mr. Chamberlain's
Premiership.
The first two of these six considerations were as follows:
Together with many members of both Houses of Parliament, I was
fully aware that among the agencies both here and abroad, which had been
actively engaged in promoting bad feeling between Great Britain and
Germany, organised Jewry, for obvious reasons, had played a leading part.
I knew the U.S.A. to be the headquarters of Jewry, and therefore
the real, though not apparent, centre of their activities. It was not
until 1948 that corroborative evidence of the foregoing from
unimpeachable American sources came into my hands; but when it did come,
however, the authentic and fully documented character of the work left
nothing to be desired.
I refer to the book by Professor Charles Beard entitled */President
Roosevelt and the Coming of the War 1941/*, which was published by the
Yale University Press in April 1948. This book, which comes with all the
authority of its eminent author, is nothing less than a tremendous
indictment of President Roosevelt on three main issues.
Firstly, that he got himself elected on the strength of repeated
promises, to the effect that he would keep the U.S.A. out of any
European war; secondly, that he incessantly and flagrantly disregarded
not only his promises to the American people, but all the laws of
neutrality <http://www.sweetliberty.org//issues/wars/book.htm>; thirdly,
that at a predetermined moment he deliberately converted this cold war,
which he had been conducting, into a shooting war, by sending the
Japanese an ultimatum
<http://www.sweetliberty.org//issues/wars/hull.htm>, which no one could
imagine could result in anything but immediate war.
From many instances given relating to the first issue, I quote one:
"At Boston on October 30th, 1940, he (F.D.R.) was even more
emphatic, for there he declared:
'I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and
again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars';
and on December 29th:
'You can therefore nail any talk about sending armies to Europe
as deliberate untruth'."
Professor Beard goes on to prove that while Mr. Roosevelt was
making these speeches, he was treating international laws of neutrality
with total disregard, and in the interests only of those who were
fighting the Jews' battles. The two main forms of non-shooting
intervention were the convoying of U.S. ships of ammunition and supplies
for the allies, and the Lend Lease Act.
Whatever be our sentiments in appreciating the help of the U.S.
arsenals and navy under these two cold war decisions of Mr. Roosevelt,
no one can pretend that they were either in accordance with his pledges
to the American people, or the fundamentals of international law
regarding neutrality.
Some very plain speaking went on in Congress over these acts of the
President's. Representative U. Burdick, of North Dakota, said:
"All our aid to Britain may mean anything . . . To sell her supplies
is one thing . . . to sell her supplies and convoy them is another
thing, to have actual war is the last thing -- the last thing is
inevitable from the first thing!"
Representative Hugh Paterson, of Georgia, said:
"It is a measure of aggressive war."
Representative Dewey Short, of Missouri, said:
"You cannot be half-way in war, and half-way out of war . . . You
can dress this measure up all you please (Lend-Lease), you can
sprinkle it with perfume and pour powder on it . . . but it is still
foul and stinks to high heaven."
Representative Philip Bennett, of Missouri, declared:
"This conclusion is inescapable, that the President is reconciled to
active military intervention if such intervention is needed to
defeat the Axis in this war.
But our boys are not going to be sent abroad, says the President.
Nonsense, Mr Chairman; even now their berths are being built in our
transport ships. Even now the tags for identification of the dead
and wounded are being printed by the firm of William C. Ballantyne
and Co., of Washington."
Professor Beard proves the third point at great length, showing how
at the appropriate moment President Roosevelt forced the Japanese into
war by an ultimatum demanding instant compliance with terms, which could
never have been accepted by any country.
"The memorandum which Senator Hull, with the approval of President
Roosevelt, handed to Japan on 26th November, 1941 . . . amounted to
the maximum terms of an American policy for the whole Orient."
writes Professor Beard, and goes on to say:
"It required no profound knowledge of Japanese history,
institutions, and psychology to warrant . . . first that no Japanese
Cabinet 'liberal or reactionary,' could have accepted the provisions."
and again later:
"The Japanese agent regarded the American memorandum as a kind of
ultimatum. This much at least Secretary Hull knew on November 26th."
Thus was the period of maximum intervention short of a shooting war
terminated, and a save-face forged for Roosevelt to ship U.S. boys
overseas without apparently breaking the spirit of his many promises.
As the war proceeded the real policy and sympathies of the
President became more and more apparent. His deception of the British
and their Allies was no less flagrant than his deception of the American
people.
As Professor Beard points out on page 576:-
"The noble principles of the Four Freedoms, and the Atlantic Charter
were for practical purposes discarded in the settlements, which
accompanied the progress and followed the conclusion of the war.
To the validity of this statement the treatment of the people of
Esthonia, Lithuania, Poland, Roumania, Yugoslavia, China,
Indo-China, Indonesia, Italy, Germany and other places of the earth
bear witness."
Some great driving force was clearly at work to induce a President
of the United States so to act.
We have seen from a previous chapter that it was not the
preservation of the British Empire, nor the French Empire, nor the
Dutch, that swayed the President. On the contrary, he had advised his
ardent lieutenant, Mr. Churchill, at an early stage in the cold war that
these must be liquidated.
It was not Europe, nor the countries of Europe, nor their
liberties, nor rights under the Atlantic Charter of Four Freedoms which
weighed with him.
We know now that the British and American armies were actually
halted by General Ike Eisenhower under Mr. Roosevelt's rulings at the
Yalta Conference, so that the Red Army of Jewish Bolshevism might
overflow half Europe and occupy Berlin.
To quote again from Professor Beard:
"As a consequence of the war called necessary to overthrow Hitler's
despotism,' another despotism was raised to a higher pitch of power."
In conclusion, Professor Beard condenses the many indictments of
the President set forth in his book, into 12 major counts, and declares:
"If these precedents are to stand unimpeached, and to provide
sanctions for the continued conduct of America affairs -- the
Constitution may be nullified by the President and officers who have
taken the oath and are under moral obligation to uphold it.
For limited Government under supreme law they may substitute
personal and arbitrary government -- the first principle of the
totalitarian system against which it has been alleged that World War
II was waged-while giving lip service to the principle of
constitutional government."
When we reflect upon the astounding contents of Professor Beard's
book, and consider them in conjunction with the revelations in Colonel
Roosevelt's */As He Saw It/*, the question arises: whom, and which
interests did President Roosevelt not betray.
To this query I can only see one answer, namely, those people and
their interests who planned from the start the use of United States
arsenals and Forces to prosecute a war which would annihilate a Europe
which had *freed itself from Jewish gold* and revolutionary control:
people who planned to dissolve the British Empire, to forge chains of
unrepayable debt, wherewith to coerce Britain to this end; and to enable
the Soviets to "bestride Europe like a colossus,"** *in other words,
International Jewry.
***These very words were used by General Smuts, who added words to the
effect that he welcomed such a prospect. It should be remembered that
General Smuts was formerly chief legal adviser to the Zionist
Organisation in S. Africa.
http://iamthewitness.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"If I'm the president, we're going to have emergency-room care,
we're going to have gag orders."
--- Adolph Bush
.
|
