| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"rms" |
| Date: |
17 Dec 2005 11:24:39 PM |
| Object: |
The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
"President Bush defended the program yesterday, saying it was saving lives,
hotly insisting that he was working within the Constitution and the law, and
denouncing The Times for disclosing the program's existence. We don't know
if he was right on the first count; this White House has cried wolf so many
times on the urgency of national security threats that it has lost all
credibility. But we have learned the hard way that Mr. Bush's team cannot be
trusted to find the boundaries of the law, much less respect them.
Mr. Bush said he would not retract his secret directive or halt the illegal
spying, so Congress should find a way to force him to do it. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/18/opinion/18sun1.html?hp
rms
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times IS ALLIED WITH AL QUEDA |
18 Dec 2005 11:43:36 AM |
|
|
i would shut down this western version of al jazeera.....they are left
wing criminals over there.
Boycott Aruba !
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Fredric L. Rice" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 01:30:31 PM |
|
|
"rms" <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net> wrote:
Mr. Bush said he would not retract his secret directive or halt the illegal
spying, so Congress should find a way to force him to do it. "
Yes, by trying and executing him for treason against America.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/18/opinion/18sun1.html?hp
---
http://www.ElmerFudd.US/ http://www.rightard.org/ http://www.thedarkwind.org/
"SUVs don't burn down by themselves." -- Some elf in a bunny suit
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rick Hohensee" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 07:57:04 AM |
|
|
In article <ro6pf.4017$rq3.2208@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>,
rms <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net> wrote:
"President Bush defended the program yesterday, saying it was saving lives,
hotly insisting that he was working within the Constitution and the law, and
denouncing The Times for disclosing the program's existence. We don't know
if he was right on the first count; this White House has cried wolf so many
times on the urgency of national security threats that it has lost all
credibility. But we have learned the hard way that Mr. Bush's team cannot be
trusted to find the boundaries of the law, much less respect them.
Mr. Bush said he would not retract his secret directive or halt the illegal
spying, so Congress should find a way to force him to do it. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/18/opinion/18sun1.html?hp
rms
Such a deal.
Bush can be impeached, ousted by an Amendment such as Hohensee-Feingold,
or the country can simply continue to tend more and more to follow my lead
rather than Dubya's, as Dubya himself does on occaision such as with 'his'
tax simplification proposal, which idea he got from me. Of course, no-one
trusts a Bush with a tax system overhaul.
--
Rick (Richard Allen) Hohensee Party of one
candidate, President of the United States of America
humbubba@smart.net Maryland, USA
Ground troops out of Iraq Put the CIA under INS
Semi-legalize drugs Prosecute Bush Tighten the borders
Isolate Israel Tax churches halve military aquisitions
platform http://www.smart.net/~humbubba/platform
Hohensee-Feingold Amendment http://www.smart.net/~humbubba
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Minerva" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
17 Dec 2005 11:43:31 PM |
|
|
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
I do not yet have a copy of his speech, but I will post it when I get it.
Truly a magnificent speech, one of his best and one of the best on the
Senate floor in many a year. Amid the Bush sychophants who cannot think on
their own, he and many Democrats stand out as beacons in a dismal
Washington. He is stronger than ever and puts many a younger Senator to
shame. God Bless him and I wish him and his family well. We need more like
him. He answers Bush very well. I wish they could appear together in
debate in front of the public. Byrd would cut him down to size.
"rms" <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net> wrote in message
news:ro6pf.4017$rq3.2208@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com...
"President Bush defended the program yesterday, saying it was saving
lives,
hotly insisting that he was working within the Constitution and the law,
and
denouncing The Times for disclosing the program's existence. We don't know
if he was right on the first count; this White House has cried wolf so
many
times on the urgency of national security threats that it has lost all
credibility. But we have learned the hard way that Mr. Bush's team cannot
be
trusted to find the boundaries of the law, much less respect them.
Mr. Bush said he would not retract his secret directive or halt the
illegal
spying, so Congress should find a way to force him to do it. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/18/opinion/18sun1.html?hp
rms
.
|
|
|
| User: "rms" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 12:24:26 AM |
|
|
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
If there is one thing that is clear after 5 years of Bush in power, it
is that he simply has no respect, no respect for anything, no respect for
anyone. No respect for tradition, no respect for the Constitution, no
respect for the value of a human life, American or otherwise.
He has to be slapped down, repeatedly and publically, over and over
again, time after time, like a little boy with matches who likes to start
fires, before he will finally get to the stage where he stops picking up the
FUCKING matches.
rms
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "jimpgh2002" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 12:16:25 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 12:53:58 AM |
|
|
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than that.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimpgh2002" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 09:45:26 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:53:58 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than that.
And I would expect more intelligent responses from
politicians. I would expect them to care more about the safety of
Americans than gaining political power.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 05:39:40 PM |
|
|
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7t0bq1l221ur20010sh0s7io64mdnktit8@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:53:58 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions
that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than that.
And I would expect more intelligent responses from
politicians. I would expect them to care more about the safety of
Americans than gaining political power.
Interesting you interpret it that way, Bush is the one trying to gain more
power, but you point the finger at Byrd. Byrd is already respected, Bush is
the one who is losing ground.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimpgh2002" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 06:57:58 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:39:40 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7t0bq1l221ur20010sh0s7io64mdnktit8@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:53:58 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions
that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than that.
And I would expect more intelligent responses from
politicians. I would expect them to care more about the safety of
Americans than gaining political power.
Interesting you interpret it that way, Bush is the one trying to gain more
power, but you point the finger at Byrd. Byrd is already respected, Bush is
the one who is losing ground.
It's not just Byrd. It's most of the democrats with the
notable exception of Lieberman.
Bush doesn't need to gain more power...he's the President of
the USA. The dems want to get that office back, along with the Senate
& HOR. They want it so badly, they will endanger American lives to
get it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 10:56:30 PM |
|
|
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:771cq156nil67fgeqqiq424t5limovvveb@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:39:40 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7t0bq1l221ur20010sh0s7io64mdnktit8@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:53:58 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the
provisions
that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than that.
And I would expect more intelligent responses from
politicians. I would expect them to care more about the safety of
Americans than gaining political power.
Interesting you interpret it that way, Bush is the one trying to gain
more
power, but you point the finger at Byrd. Byrd is already respected, Bush
is
the one who is losing ground.
It's not just Byrd. It's most of the democrats with the
notable exception of Lieberman.
Bush doesn't need to gain more power...he's the President of
the USA. The dems want to get that office back, along with the Senate
& HOR. They want it so badly, they will endanger American lives to
get it.
Interesting assumption on your part. I see Bush as crying "Wolf" a lot, and
you are buying it. I DON'T see Bush as doing anything REAL to make us
"safer", just sending out the scare warnings. If the Democrats were IN
POWER, maybe we WOULD see something happening.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimpgh2002" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
19 Dec 2005 12:06:40 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:56:30 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:771cq156nil67fgeqqiq424t5limovvveb@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:39:40 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7t0bq1l221ur20010sh0s7io64mdnktit8@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:53:58 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the
provisions
that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than that.
And I would expect more intelligent responses from
politicians. I would expect them to care more about the safety of
Americans than gaining political power.
Interesting you interpret it that way, Bush is the one trying to gain
more
power, but you point the finger at Byrd. Byrd is already respected, Bush
is
the one who is losing ground.
It's not just Byrd. It's most of the democrats with the
notable exception of Lieberman.
Bush doesn't need to gain more power...he's the President of
the USA. The dems want to get that office back, along with the Senate
& HOR. They want it so badly, they will endanger American lives to
get it.
Interesting assumption on your part. I see Bush as crying "Wolf" a lot, and
you are buying it. I DON'T see Bush as doing anything REAL to make us
"safer", just sending out the scare warnings. If the Democrats were IN
POWER, maybe we WOULD see something happening.
But since nothing has happened since 9/11/2001, something must
be going right, correct?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Roy Blankenship" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
19 Dec 2005 01:53:56 AM |
|
|
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aejcq1tkhg4b0elu0j4vat9i0jedlgst7l@4ax.com...
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:56:30 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:771cq156nil67fgeqqiq424t5limovvveb@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:39:40 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7t0bq1l221ur20010sh0s7io64mdnktit8@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:53:58 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the
provisions
that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted
down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than
that.
And I would expect more intelligent responses from
politicians. I would expect them to care more about the safety of
Americans than gaining political power.
Interesting you interpret it that way, Bush is the one trying to gain
more
power, but you point the finger at Byrd. Byrd is already respected,
Bush
is
the one who is losing ground.
It's not just Byrd. It's most of the democrats with the
notable exception of Lieberman.
Bush doesn't need to gain more power...he's the President of
the USA. The dems want to get that office back, along with the Senate
& HOR. They want it so badly, they will endanger American lives to
get it.
Interesting assumption on your part. I see Bush as crying "Wolf" a lot,
and
you are buying it. I DON'T see Bush as doing anything REAL to make us
"safer", just sending out the scare warnings. If the Democrats were IN
POWER, maybe we WOULD see something happening.
But since nothing has happened since 9/11/2001, something must
be going right, correct?
I think your cause and effect are backward. I think there is a bigger
picture here. How perfect that 9-11 happened in time to keep the populous
shaking in their boots and looking toward the President to "protect" them.
We send $300,000,000,000 to another country while we don't have enough
border guards for our own borders. Is this good management? Is this
protecting the US from terror? I think nothing else has happened because
there is a bigger force controlling world events, and the US population is
right where they want them. Am I saying our government had something to do
with 9-11? I believe yes, I don't know on what level, but there is too much
bizarre stuff to ignore the possibility. The most telling to me was when
they brought down Building 7 and it was a controlled demolition, and they
even used demolition terms to describe it. When would they have had the time
to set the charges?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "ouroboros rex" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
19 Dec 2005 11:53:18 AM |
|
|
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aejcq1tkhg4b0elu0j4vat9i0jedlgst7l@4ax.com...
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:56:30 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:771cq156nil67fgeqqiq424t5limovvveb@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:39:40 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7t0bq1l221ur20010sh0s7io64mdnktit8@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:53:58 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the
provisions
that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than
that.
And I would expect more intelligent responses from
politicians. I would expect them to care more about the safety of
Americans than gaining political power.
Interesting you interpret it that way, Bush is the one trying to gain
more
power, but you point the finger at Byrd. Byrd is already respected,
Bush
is
the one who is losing ground.
It's not just Byrd. It's most of the democrats with the
notable exception of Lieberman.
Bush doesn't need to gain more power...he's the President of
the USA. The dems want to get that office back, along with the Senate
& HOR. They want it so badly, they will endanger American lives to
get it.
Interesting assumption on your part. I see Bush as crying "Wolf" a lot,
and
you are buying it. I DON'T see Bush as doing anything REAL to make us
"safer", just sending out the scare warnings. If the Democrats were IN
POWER, maybe we WOULD see something happening.
But since nothing has happened since 9/11/2001, something must
be going right, correct?
Yep, and since I haven't had a car wreck this year, I'm now car wreck
proof!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lamont Cranston" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
19 Dec 2005 01:31:48 PM |
|
|
ouroboros rex wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aejcq1tkhg4b0elu0j4vat9i0jedlgst7l@4ax.com...
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:56:30 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:771cq156nil67fgeqqiq424t5limovvveb@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 23:39:40 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:7t0bq1l221ur20010sh0s7io64mdnktit8@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 06:53:58 GMT, "Roy Blankenship"
<pointblank@earthlink.net> wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the
provisions
that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
I would have expected a more intelligent response from you than
that.
And I would expect more intelligent responses from
politicians. I would expect them to care more about the safety of
Americans than gaining political power.
Interesting you interpret it that way, Bush is the one trying to gain
more
power, but you point the finger at Byrd. Byrd is already respected,
Bush
is
the one who is losing ground.
It's not just Byrd. It's most of the democrats with the
notable exception of Lieberman.
Bush doesn't need to gain more power...he's the President of
the USA. The dems want to get that office back, along with the Senate
& HOR. They want it so badly, they will endanger American lives to
get it.
Interesting assumption on your part. I see Bush as crying "Wolf" a lot,
and
you are buying it. I DON'T see Bush as doing anything REAL to make us
"safer", just sending out the scare warnings. If the Democrats were IN
POWER, maybe we WOULD see something happening.
But since nothing has happened since 9/11/2001, something must
be going right, correct?
Yep, and since I haven't had a car wreck this year, I'm now car wreck
proof!
Actually, much has happened since 9/11/2001. Worldwide terrorist
attacks and related deaths have risen dramatically since 9/11/2001.
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5889435/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dennis M" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
19 Dec 2005 03:28:14 PM |
|
|
In article <771cq156nil67fgeqqiq424t5limovvveb@4ax.com>, jimpgh2002
<pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote:
Bush doesn't need to gain more power...he's the President of the USA.
So what, Napoleon, Hitler and countless other despots throughout history
weren't satisfied to be merely the heads of state of their respective
countries. And Bush isn't content to be just the president. He wants to be
the absolute ruler and all existing laws passed by Congress be damned.
The dems want to get that office back, along with the Senate & HOR.
They want it so badly, they will endanger American lives to get it.
When the Dems start an elective war that causes the deaths of some 2,154
American lives and the permanent maiming of tens of thousands more get back
to us.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Submariner" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 12:06:02 PM |
|
|
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
Off. But his ***** was in your mother's mouth at the time.
.
|
|
|
| User: "jimpgh2002" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 04:05:07 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 13:06:02 -0500, "Submariner" <Oby@hellnumber.net>
wrote:
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
Off. But his ***** was in your mother's mouth at the time.
That figures, since she is deceased.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Minerva" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 12:40:07 AM |
|
|
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right wing
militiarist bullies have their swastikas and they are with us today and in
power. If you cross them, they will come.
Here is a little quote of a short message attributed to Pastor Martin
Niemoller:
"First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out because I was
not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not
speak out because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews,
and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me, and
there was no one left to speak for me."
"jimpgh2002" <pmojh1@xxnospamxxhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0lv9q1h8b67relfvu2rtodj6snu1mjita3@4ax.com...
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:43:31 -0500, "Minerva"
<publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote:
Senator Robert Byrd gave the best presentation of why the provisions that
extend unconstitutional spying on Americans should be voted down.
Did he do that with or without his hood on?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 01:04:06 AM |
|
|
"Minerva" <publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote in message
news:f-ydnfexOtjGnzjeRVn-og@rcn.net...
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right wing
militiarist bullies have their swastikas
The hood was real, the swastikas are a wishful fantasy of the batshit left.
A bit of a difference there.
Reality eludes you.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "sleeper" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 01:58:40 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kfv3F17v08sU1@individual.net:
"Minerva" <publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote in message
news:f-ydnfexOtjGnzjeRVn-og@rcn.net...
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right wing
militiarist bullies have their swastikas
The hood was real, the swastikas are a wishful fantasy of the batshit
left. A bit of a difference there.
the only difference is that the yellow ribbon has replaced the swastika.
Reality eludes you.
support the troops or be subjected to surveillance.
--
http://www.kexp.org
listener-powered and commercial-free.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 02:03:46 AM |
|
|
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns9730703A90Csleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kfv3F17v08sU1@individual.net:
"Minerva" <publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote in message
news:f-ydnfexOtjGnzjeRVn-og@rcn.net...
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right wing
militiarist bullies have their swastikas
The hood was real, the swastikas are a wishful fantasy of the batshit
left. A bit of a difference there.
the only difference is that the yellow ribbon has replaced the swastika.
Reality eludes you.
support the troops or be subjected to surveillance.
No, just support the troops or be ingrate.
They are protecting your undeserving worthless *****.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "sleeper" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 02:20:44 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kjeuF1ab4jaU1@individual.net:
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns9730703A90Csleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kfv3F17v08sU1@individual.net:
"Minerva" <publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote in message
news:f-ydnfexOtjGnzjeRVn-og@rcn.net...
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right wing
militiarist bullies have their swastikas
The hood was real, the swastikas are a wishful fantasy of the batshit
left. A bit of a difference there.
the only difference is that the yellow ribbon has replaced the swastika.
Reality eludes you.
support the troops or be subjected to surveillance.
No, just support the troops or be ingrate.
They are protecting your undeserving worthless *****.
it's what i pay them for.
oops. i mean it's what china pays them for.
--
http://www.kexp.org
listener-powered and commercial-free.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 02:25:38 AM |
|
|
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns973042DEAA5Dsleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kjeuF1ab4jaU1@individual.net:
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns9730703A90Csleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kfv3F17v08sU1@individual.net:
"Minerva" <publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote in message
news:f-ydnfexOtjGnzjeRVn-og@rcn.net...
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right wing
militiarist bullies have their swastikas
The hood was real, the swastikas are a wishful fantasy of the batshit
left. A bit of a difference there.
the only difference is that the yellow ribbon has replaced the swastika.
Reality eludes you.
support the troops or be subjected to surveillance.
No, just support the troops or be ingrate.
They are protecting your undeserving worthless *****.
it's what i pay them for.
oops. i mean it's what china pays them for.
I new you were to cheap.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "sleeper" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 02:33:26 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kknvF1al95aU1@individual.net:
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns973042DEAA5Dsleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kjeuF1ab4jaU1@individual.net:
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns9730703A90Csleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kfv3F17v08sU1@individual.net:
"Minerva" <publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote in message
news:f-ydnfexOtjGnzjeRVn-og@rcn.net...
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right
wing militiarist bullies have their swastikas
The hood was real, the swastikas are a wishful fantasy of the
batshit left. A bit of a difference there.
the only difference is that the yellow ribbon has replaced the
swastika.
Reality eludes you.
support the troops or be subjected to surveillance.
No, just support the troops or be ingrate.
They are protecting your undeserving worthless *****.
it's what i pay them for.
oops. i mean it's what china pays them for.
I new you were to cheap.
i might have paid them when we had a budget surplus. now we're a debtor
nation.
again.
we could have paid for the war had the republicans not driven the plane
into the fucking mountain.
again.
--
http://www.kexp.org
listener-powered and commercial-free.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 02:41:07 AM |
|
|
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns9730654DD1ABsleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kknvF1al95aU1@individual.net:
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns973042DEAA5Dsleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kjeuF1ab4jaU1@individual.net:
"sleeper" <moc.sseldnim@repeels> wrote in message
news:Xns9730703A90Csleeper@216.168.3.50...
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kfv3F17v08sU1@individual.net:
"Minerva" <publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote in message
news:f-ydnfexOtjGnzjeRVn-og@rcn.net...
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right
wing militiarist bullies have their swastikas
The hood was real, the swastikas are a wishful fantasy of the
batshit left. A bit of a difference there.
the only difference is that the yellow ribbon has replaced the
swastika.
Reality eludes you.
support the troops or be subjected to surveillance.
No, just support the troops or be ingrate.
They are protecting your undeserving worthless *****.
it's what i pay them for.
oops. i mean it's what china pays them for.
I new you were to cheap.
i might have paid them when we had a budget surplus. now we're a debtor
nation.
again.
we could have paid for the war had the republicans not driven the plane
into the fucking mountain.
I'll continue to vote my pocket book
(an old dem slogan I think)
My income has jumped 30K in the last two years.
Not bad for a working stiff.
Go Republicans.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "enialle" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
18 Dec 2005 10:18:08 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 18 Dec 2005 07:58:40 -0000, sleeper <moc.sseldnim@repeels>
wrote:
"Jim E" <YD641387@SEA.net> waxed rhapsodic in
news:40kfv3F17v08sU1@individual.net:
"Minerva" <publicforum.mag@erols.com> wrote in message
news:f-ydnfexOtjGnzjeRVn-og@rcn.net...
He took his off more than 50yrs ago, but Georgie and his right wing
militiarist bullies have their swastikas
The hood was real, the swastikas are a wishful fantasy of the batshit
left. A bit of a difference there.
typical right wing idiocy. Attack the messenger. Gosh it's all they
have left and even that is pretty pathetic.
the only difference is that the yellow ribbon has replaced the swastika.
Reality eludes you.
support the troops or be subjected to surveillance.
how much you want to bet bush tapped the phone lines of Fitzgerald
the prosecutor for the Plame affair?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Captain Cab" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
19 Dec 2005 11:29:15 AM |
|
|
But they are only spying on the ter'rists and we have no reason to
believe they would lie to us.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Captain Cab" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
19 Dec 2005 11:35:37 AM |
|
|
But they are only spying on the ter'rists and we have no reason to
believe they would lie to us.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Acknee Wombuster" |
|
| Title: Re: The New York Times: "Screw You, George W. Bush!" |
19 Dec 2005 11:46:02 AM |
|
|
Reason to lie? How about ... dumbya and dickie on the LIARS' CIRCUIT
this week?
These compulsive, pathological liars are feverishly trying to lie their
way out of their original lies about WMD, Hussein-Twin Towers bombing
connection, Patriot Act civil liberties protection, secret CIA prisons
abroad, and the latest secret - illegal authorization of spying in the
U.S.
You can tell when bushie's lying because his beady eyes get more
flittery, he stammers more, he becomes physically more shifty behind
the mike, and his "uhs" dominate his invitation-only "news
conferences." He definitely needs more pep talks from his female
Rasputin, Karen Hughes.
*****, formerly "Greet Me As A Liberator," formerly "Go ***** Yourself,"
now "We've Turned the Corner" Cheney, speaking as usual from the left
side of his mouth, is more adept in keeping a steady gaze and
controlled tone of voice. But like Josef Goebbels, Dickie harps on a
few repetitive BIG LIES, in the hope that sooner or later American
fundamentalists and red-staters - his main, dup'd, hypocritical
supporters, will accept
his baldfaced prevaricative statements.
And did you catch Condi Rice's interviews, post-dumbya's speech this
weekend? She absolutely seemed to be trembling as, lips and chin
quavering, she spewed lies in support of her president's lies.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
