| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"JP" |
| Date: |
08 Apr 2006 09:09:00 PM |
| Object: |
THE SECRET AGENDA - Parts 1 & 2 |
http://newswithviews.com/Monteith/stanley2.htm
http://newswithviews.com/Monteith/stanley3.htm
THE SECRET AGENDA - 1
PART 1 of 2
By Dr. Stanley Monteith
March 17, 2006
NewsWithViews.com
Most Americans believe the U.S. won the Cold War, yet Russia is deploying a
new generation of rockets "designed . . . to bypass western anti-missile
defense," China is modernizing its nuclear warheads, Peru has declared a
"state of emergency" in the south where Maoist revolutionaries (Shining Path
rebels) seized a town and Sri Lanka is fighting Maoist rebels who control a
large part of that country. India, Britain, and the U.S. have embargoed arms
shipments to the King of Nepal who is fighting Maoist rebels who are trying
to overthrow his government. If the U.S.-backed embargo is successful, the
democratically elected government of Nepal will fall. [1] Why are these
things happening? The situation is confusing unless you are old enough to
remember the tragic events that took place during the twentieth century.
Following World War II the U.S. embargoed arms shipments to the Nationalist
Chinese, and brought Chairman Mao's regime to power [2] The U.S. embargoed
arms shipments to Cuba, ordered President Batista to leave, and brought
Fidel Castro to power [3] The U.S. embargoed arms shipments to Nicaragua,
told President Somoza to leave, and brought the Sandinista to power.[4] CIA
officials met with the Ayatollah Khomeini before the Iranian revolution. The
U.S. undermined the Iranian government, told the Shah to leave, and brought
the Ayatollah Khomeini to power [5] The U.S. embargoed arms shipments and
essential supplies to Rhodesia, and brought Robert Mugabe's Maoist
government to power. [6] Why did the U.S. destabilize many pro-western
governments, and bring Marxist governments to power? Why is the U.S.
undermining the democratically elected government of Nepal today?
General Gamal Abdel Nasser faced that dilemma when he ruled Egypt
(1953-1970). He wrote a letter to President Kennedy that asked:
"Why does the United States, a country established on foundations of freedom
and by means of a revolution, oppose the call of freedom and revolutionary
movements, and line up with reactionary forces and enemies of progress?" [7]
Elsewhere, General Nasser wrote:
"The genius of you Americans is that you never make clear cut stupid moves,
only complicated stupid moves which make us wonder at the possibility that
there may be something we are missing." [8]
I believe U.S. foreign policy is designed to confuse the American people and
national leaders who are unaware of the Spiritual Hierarchy's plan to
"establish an enlightened democracy among the nations of the world."[9] The
tragic situation in the Middle East is an excellent example of that
strategy. If you analyze the events taking place, they defy logic. Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, the newly elected President of Iran, has announced his country
will continue enriching uranium despite the objections of the International
Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC), the UN, the U.S., Israel, and many other
nations.[10]
President Ahmadinejad could have agreed to negotiate the issue, and covertly
continued Iran's nuclear program, but he didn't. He spurned Russia's offer
to provide enriched uranium, he rejected the UN's offer to negotiate the
dispute, he "called for Israel to be 'wiped off the map,'" he denied the
Holocaust took place, and suggested "the Jewish state should be moved to
Europe." [11]President Ahmadinejad seems to be trying to inflame the passion
of the Israelis, and their allies in the United States. Why would a rational
man risk imposition of UN sanctions on his country? Why would a logical man
encourage a pre-emptive attack on his nation? Is Mahmoud Ahmadinejad insane?
Is he demented? Is he affiliated with the Spiritual Hierarchy that controls
most governments?
Last month's Radio Liberty letter discussed Congressman John Murtha's
November 17, 2005, address to Congress which revealed:
"The war in Iraq is not going as advertised. . . . Our military is
suffering. The future of our country is at risk. . . . The main reason for
going to war has been discredited. . . . The intelligence concerning Iraq
was wrong. . . . I have been visiting our wounded troops at Bethesda and
Walter Reed hospitals. . . . What demoralizes them is going to war with not
enough troops and equipment to make the transition to peace. . . . The
future of our military is at risk. . . . Many say that the Army is broken.
Some of our troops are on their third deployment. . . . Much of our ground
equipment is worn out and in need of either serious overhaul or replacement.
.. . . We must rebuild our Army. . . . Deaths and injuries are growing, with
over 2,079 confirmed American deaths. Over 15,500 have been seriously
injured and it is estimated that over 50,000 will suffer from battle
fatigue. There have been reports of at least 30,000 Iraqi civilian deaths. .
.. . Oil production and energy production are below pre-war levels. . . .
Unemployment remains at about 60 percent. Clean water is scarce. . . .
Insurgent incidents have increased from about 150 per week to over 700 in
the last year. . . . Our troops have become the primary target of the
insurgency. . . . We have become a catalyst for violence. . . . A poll . . .
shows that over 80% of Iraqis are strongly opposed to the presence of
coalition troops, and about 45% of the Iraqi population believe attacks
against American troops are justified."[12]
President Bush responded to Congressman Murtha's remarks on December 18,
2005. Speaking from the Oval Office, President Bush proclaimed:
"Three days ago . . . Iraqis went to the polls to choose their own leaders.
.. . . This election will not mean the end of violence. But it is the
beginning of something new: constitutional democracy at the heart of the
Middle East. And this vote . . . means that America has an ally of growing
strength in the fight against terror. . . . Yet our work is not done. There
is more testing and sacrifice before us."[13]
If you analyze President Bush's opening statement, and understand the
Spiritual Hierarchy wants to expand the war in the Middle East, you can
anticipate what lies ahead. The U.S. will remain in Iraq because "our work
is not done. There is more testing and sacrifice before us." The fighting
will continue, many more young Americans (and Iraqis) will die, but their
deaths are justified because the Iraqi election "is the beginning of
something new: constitutional democracy at the heart of the Middle East."
Does the creation of a "constitutional democracy" justify the U.S. attack on
Iraq? Will a "constitutional democracy" in the Middle East restore the lives
of the young Americans and the Iraqi civilians who have died?
President Bush claims he ordered the attack on Iraq because he was misled by
faulty intelligence:
"It is true that Saddam Hussein had a history of pursuing and using weapons
of mass destruction. It is true that he systematically concealed those
programs, and blocked the work of U.N. weapons inspectors. It is true that
many nations believed that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. But much
of the intelligence turned out to be wrong."[14]
In actuality, the intelligence reports President Bush received were correct.
Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and used them on several
occasions. The American people have been deceived by media pundits and
politicians who debate the wrong issues. The question is not whether Saddam
Hussein had WMDs. The proper questions are:
1. Where did Saddam Hussein get the materials required to build his WMDs?
2. Was Saddam Hussein's regime a threat to the U.S.?
3. What happened to Saddam's WMDs?
4. Why wasn't Saddam Hussein sent to Europe, and tried by a UN court?
You can't understand the events taking place in the Middle East today unless
you understand the answers to those questions.
1. Where did Saddam Hussein get the materials required to build his WMDs?
An article in the January 6-12, 2003, National Weekly Edition of The
Washington Post answers that question. During the 1980s:
"The United States 'actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying
the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing military
intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring
third-country arms sales to Iraq to make sure Iraq had the military weaponry
required'. . . .
A 1994 investigation by the Senate Banking Committee turned up dozens of
biological agents shipped to Iraq during the mid-'80s under license from the
Commerce Department, including various strains of anthrax, subsequently
identified by the Pentagon as a key component of the Iraqi biological
warfare program. The Commerce Department also approved the export of
insecticides to Iraq, despite widespread suspicions that they were being
used for chemical warfare.
The fact that Iraq was using chemical weapons was hardly a secret. In
February 1984. . . . The Iraqis continued to use chemical weapons against
the Iranians until the end of the Iran - Iraq war. . . .
Although U.S. export controls to Iraq were tightened in the late 1980s . .
.. Dow Chemical sold $1.5 million of pesticides to Iraq, despite U.S.
government concerns that they could be used as chemical warfare agents."[15]
The U.S. funded Saddam Hussein's war with Iran, and provided the materials
used to produce Saddam's WMDs. Was anyone in the U.S. Commerce Department
fired or censured for supplying the lethal material? If not, we can assume
the officials did what they were told to do.
2. Was Saddam Hussein's regime a threat to the U.S.?
Before he retired from the U.S. military, four-star Marine General Anthony
Zinni was Commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, and special envoy to
the Middle East. When Steve Kroft interviewed General Zinni on CBS's 60
Minutes on May 23, 2004, Kroft quoted General Zinni's statement:
"Iraq was the wrong war at the wrong time with the wrong strategy. And he
was saying it before the US invasion. In the months leading up to the war,
while still Middle East envoy, Zinni carried the message to Congress."
When General Zinni addressed Congress, he stated:
"This is, in my view, the worst time to take this on, and I don't feel it
needs to be done now."
Steve Kroft named several generals who opposed the war:
"You said that this is really a war that the generals didn't want."
General Zinni agreed, and said:
"I believe that. . . . We felt that this situation was contained. Saddam was
effectively contained. The no-fly, no-drive zones, the sanctions that were
imposed on him. Now, at the same time, we had this war on terrorism. We were
fighting al-Qaeda, we were engaged in Afghanistan. . . . And I think most of
the generals felt, 'Let's deal with this one at a time, let's . . . deal
with this threat from terrorism, from al-Qaeda.'"[16]
If Saddam Hussein was "effectively contained," and his regime wasn't a
threat to the United States, why did the Bush administration attack Iraq?
3. What happened to Saddam's WMDs?
Joel Skousen, Avi Lipkin, and Dore Gold, the former Israeli Ambassador to
the UN, claim that most of Saddam's WMDs were transferred to Syria, some may
have been sent to Iran. Lieutenant General Moshe Yaalon, the former Chief of
Staff of the Israeli army, verified that fact during a recent interview.[17]
You can confirm their information by going to Google and typing in "Iraq WMD
Syria." There are 1,640,000 references on the site. How could that be?
Why does the Bush administration claim there were no WMDs in Iraq? I suspect
the weapons will be found when the U.S. invades Syria, or topples that
government.
4. Why wasn't Saddam Hussein sent to Europe, and tried by a UN court?
U.S. officials had to control the judicial process, and prevent mention of
the fact that Saddam worked for the CIA in the late 1950s, was financed by
the U.S. in the 1980s, and received most of the materials used to produce
Iraq's WMDs from U.S. companies.[18]
Why did the U.S. undermine pro-Western governments and replace them with
Marxist dictatorships during the latter half of the twentieth century? Why
did the CIA undermine the Shaw of Iran and help bring the Ayatolla Khomeini
to power in 1979? Why did the U.S. support Saddam Hussein during the 1980s?
Why is the U.S. trying to topple the government of Nepal today? The Secret
Agenda: Part II explains what is taking place. For part 2 click below.
Footnotes:
1, [Read] [Read] [Read] [Read]
2, Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, Eighty-second Congress, Second
Session, S Res. 366: July 25, 1951 - June 20, 1952: Institute of Pacific
Relations, pp. 204-205.
3, Earl E. T. Smith, The Fourth Floor, Random House, New York, 1962, p. 82:
See Also: Cuba: The Untold Story video: Available from Radio Liberty.
4, Anastasio Somoza, Nicaragua Betrayed, Western Islands, 1980, p. 353. See
Also: John Rees, "Anastasio Somoza and Jack Cox," The Review of the News,
Oct. 1, 1980, p. 45.
5, Fereydoun Hoveyda, The Fall of The Shah, Wyndham Books, New York, 1979,
pp. 198-200.See Also: [Read]
6, Radio Liberty interview with Peter Hammond. Available from Radio Liberty.
7, Robert Dreyfuss, Devil's Game, Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt and
Company, New York, 2005, pp. 139-140.
8, Ibid., p. 120.
9, Manly P. Hall, The Secret Destiny of America, The Philosophical Research
Society Inc., Los Angeles, p. 80.
10, [Read]
11, Ibid.
12, [Read]
13, [Read]
14, Ibid.
15, Michael Dobbs, "When an Ally Becomes the Enemy," The Washington Post,
National Weekly Edition, January 6-12, 2003, p. 9.
16, Transcript, General Anthony Zinni interview, 60 Minutes, May 23, 2004,
p.2.
17, Ira Stoll, "Saddam's WMD Moved to Syria, An Israeli Says," The New York
Sun, December 15, 2005,
18, [Read]
© 2005 Stanley Monteith - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Stanley Monteith has been studying the movement to create a world
government for almost 40 years. During his 35-year career as an orthopedic
surgeon he traveled to Europe, lived in South Africa, and researched the
records of the men and the organizations that are working to bring our
nation under the control of a corporate elite.
Dr. Monteith currently spends five hours daily on talk radio across the
nation. He writes extensively, and lectures on geopolitics. He is the author
of AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic and his most recent book Brotherhood of
Darkness is in its 8th printing.
RADIO LIBERTY, P.O. BOX 969, SOQUEL, CA. 95073 -- 800-544-8927
Web-Site: www.radioliberty.com
E-Mail:
====================================================
THE SECRET AGENDA - 2
PART 2 of 2
By Dr. Stanley Monteith
March 17, 2006
NewsWithViews.com
In part one I discussed President Bush's response to Congressman Murtha's
request for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Instead of addressing that
issue, President Bush announced the U.S. would remain in Iraq because "our
work is not done. There is more testing and sacrifice before us," and said
the recent election "is the beginning of something new: constitutional
democracy at the heart of the Middle East."
Is the U.S. fighting terrorism in Iraq, or is President Bush trying to
establish "constitutional democracy at the heart of the Middle East" and
restructure the world.
President Bush continued his December 18, 2005, address:
"America, our coalition, and Iraqi leaders are working toward the same
goal - a democratic Iraq . . . that will serve as a model of freedom for the
Middle East. . . . We're helping the Iraqi government establish the
institutions of a unified and lasting democracy . . . after a number of
setbacks, our coalition is moving forward with a reconstruction plan to
revive Iraq's economy and infrastructure. . . . Despite the violence, Iraqis
are optimistic. . . . It is . . . important for every American to understand
the consequences of pulling out of Iraq before our work is done. We would
abandon our Iraqi friends and signal to the world that America cannot be
trusted to keep its word. We would undermine the morale of our troops by
betraying the cause for which they have sacrificed. We would cause the
tyrants in the Middle East to laugh at our failed resolve, and tighten their
repressive grip. . . . There are only two options before our country -
victory or defeat." (italics added) [1]
Who is responsible for the death and injury of over 25,000 American troops,
and over 100,000 Iraqis? How many more Americans will die trying to
establish "democracy in the Middle East?" During his interview on 60
Minutes, General Anthony Zinni stated:
"There has been poor strategic thinking in this, there has been poor
operational planning and execution on the ground. And to think that we are
going to, quote, 'stay the course,' this course is headed over Niagara
Falls. I think it's time to change course . . . or at least hold somebody
responsible for putting you on this course, because it's been a failure."[2]
If our intelligence agencies provided President Bush with faulty
information, was anyone punished, was anyone suspended, was anyone fired?
What is "the cause for which they (our soldiers) have sacrificed?" President
Bush addressed that question as he concluded his December 18 address:
"My most solemn responsibility is to protect our nation. . . . I know that
some of my decisions have led to terrible loss - and not one of those
decisions has been taken lightly. . . . And I have never been more certain
that America's actions in Iraq are essential to the security of our
citizens, and will lay the foundation of peace for our children and
grandchildren."[3]
How will victory in Iraq "lay the foundation of peace for our children and
grandchildren?" I believe the Iraq war is part of the Spiritual Hierarchy's
plan to establish "universal democracy and a cooperation of all nations in a
commonwealth of States." Manly P. Hall, who was often called "Masonry's
greatest philosopher," explained their goal in his book, The Secret Destiny
of America:
"World democracy was the secret dream of the great classical philosophers.
Toward the accomplishment of this greatest of all human ends they outlined
programs of education, religion, and social conduct directed to the ultimate
achievement of a practical and universal brotherhood. . . . One of the most
ancient of man's constructive ideals is the dream of a universal democracy
and a cooperation of all nations in a commonwealth of States. The mechanism
for the accomplishment of this ideal was set in motion in the ancient
temples of Greece, Egypt, and India. So brilliant was the plan and so well
was it administrated that it has survived to our time. . . ."[4]
I believe President Bush, and the men who control him, are carrying out the
ancient plan. They are trying to establish "world democracy," but can't
reveal their agenda because most Americans want to stop the senseless
killing in the Middle East, end the war, rebuild our army, stabilize our
economy, and bring our soldiers home.
When President Bush addressed the National Endowment for Democracy on
November 6, 2003, he discussed his covert agenda:
"As the 20th century ended, there were around 120 democracies in the
world - and I can assure you more are on the way. . . . We've witnessed . .
.. the swiftest advance of freedom in the 2,500 year story of democracy.
Historians in the future will offer their own explanations for why this
happened. Yet we already know some of the reasons they will cite. It is no
accident that the rise of so many democracies took place in a time when the
world's most influential nation was itself a democracy."[5]
Why does President Bush refer to our country as "a democracy?" If you read
the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights,
The Federalist Papers, and the Constitutions of the 50 states, you will not
find a single reference to the U.S. being a democracy. The United States,
and all 50 states, are republics, but Adepts of the secret societies want
the American people to believe the U.S. is a "democracy." If you don't
understand the difference between a democracy and a republic, order a copy
of my pamphlet, "We Are a Republic."
Manly P. Hall explained the Hierarchy's hidden agenda:
"For more than three thousand years, secret societies have labored to
create the background of knowledge necessary to the establishment of an
enlightened democracy among the nations of the world."[6]
I began this letter by noting that Russia and China are building new
weapons, revolutionary movements are mounting attacks on existing
governments, and U.S. officials often help them. Why are those things taking
place? The World Revolution began in 1776 when a group of Evangelical
Christians joined forces with members of secret societies and fought the
Revolutionary War.
Most of our Founding Fathers wanted to establish a sovereign nation and
individual freedom, but the secret societies wanted to use the military and
financial power of the United States to establish "world democracy," and
confederate the world. Christian leaders controlled the United States until
the advent of the twentieth century, but were gradually replaced by Adepts
of the secret societies. We must never forget that Hitler and Mussolini were
democratically elected, and in 2004 both U.S. presidential candidates were
members of the same secret society.
The culture and values of our nation are failing, the sovereignty of our
nation is being progressively destroyed. What can we do? I will continue my
analysis of the situation in Part III of The Secret Agenda. For part 1 click
below.
Footnotes:
1, [Read]
2, Transcript, General Anthony Zinni interview, 60 Minutes, May 23, 2004,
p.2
3, www.whitehouse.gov/news. . . . op. cit.
4, Manly P. Hall, The Secret Destiny of America, The Philosophical Research
Society, Inc., Los Angeles, 1944, pp. 24-45.
5, [Read]
6, Manly P. Hall, op. cit., p. 72.
© 2005 Stanley Monteith - All Rights Reserved
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Stanley Monteith has been studying the movement to create a world
government for almost 40 years. During his 35-year career as an orthopedic
surgeon he traveled to Europe, lived in South Africa, and researched the
records of the men and the organizations that are working to bring our
nation under the control of a corporate elite.
Dr. Monteith currently spends five hours daily on talk radio across the
nation. He writes extensively, and lectures on geopolitics. He is the author
of AIDS: The Unnecessary Epidemic and his most recent book Brotherhood of
Darkness is in its 8th printing.
RADIO LIBERTY, P.O. BOX 969, SOQUEL, CA. 95073 -- 800-544-8927
Web-Site: www.radioliberty.com
E-Mail:
.
|
|
| User: "Yod Vau" |
|
| Title: Re: THE SECRET AGENDA - Parts 1 & 2 |
08 Apr 2006 11:37:54 PM |
|
|
JP wrote:
I believe the Iraq war is part of the Spiritual Hierarchy's
plan to establish "universal democracy and a cooperation of all nations in a
commonwealth of States." Manly P. Hall, who was often called "Masonry's
greatest philosopher," explained their goal in his book, The Secret Destiny
of America:
After the scandal over the murder of David Morgan around 1816, the
Masonic lodges lost credibility. President John Quincy Adams said that
they were a bunch of "devil worshippers". A short-lived Anti-Mason
party was founded to oppose the Masonic network in America.
But, it's ba-a-a-ck!
A master mason in a Blue Lodge could reach the third level and never
realize that one of the aims of Freemasonry is to destroy the Christian
church. Other aims of Masonry were to overthrow hereditary nobility and
that was done in America and France at the end of the 18th century.
Skull & Bones is an elite Masonic lodge for training the future
leadership of America to destroy organized religion by promoting "the
Fatherhood of God, the Brotherhood of Man."
God becomes a loving father, replacing the vengeful Yahweh of the Old
Testament who wants to punish sinners and destroy the world everytime
he gets *****.
The infamous coffin symbolizes the 3rd initiation step of Blue Lodge
Freemasonry, where Hiram Abiff is "resurrected" from the dead after the
three apprentice masons symbolically kill him.
There are only 29 degrees to go through after that to get to the Mystic
Shrine where you learn that god is actually a moon rock in a tent in
Mecca and that the moon fills up with souls every month and then the
souls are pumped over to the sun at full moon.
Once you've finally figured out that the ancient god of the Hebrews was
just an Egyptian *sun god* named Yao, there's no judgement day to worry
about, so you can get on with making as much money as you want by
exploiting people. There's no heaven above and no hell below.
Unless you really *want* there to be a heaven and a hell and a god and
a devil and all the other polar opposites.
Freemasonry offers all the rituals any Pharisee or Puritan could ever
want. It offers acesticism, if that's your bag, but being a libertine
is OK too, once you realize that some of the pantheon of Egyptian gods
were fertility gods like Atum who created the world by masturbating.
And what exactly is in the golden cup of abominations referred to in
Revelation 17:4?
Freemasons and Gnostics would know. Yuck!
There are icthyphallic representations of the Egyptian fertility god
Amun at the temple of Karnak, too. Akhenaten and Tutunkhamen both got
killed over the theological wars between advocates of Ra, the sun god,
and Amun, the fertiility god.
And what the heck does an obelisk or the Washington monument represent,
anyway, if not an erect penis?
But, how could the ancient Hebrew priests tell the young Israelite
bachelors about
Egyptian theology and still keep their tribe together when there were
the Earth worship rituals every spring. They had to keep their young
men out of the woods during the first full moon of springtime to keep
the tribes together.
That hasn't stopped George W. Bush from going into the woods though.
Bohemian Grove is another mystery cult where the political elite
supposedly wander around amongst the trees like druids, wearing robes
and pissing on the trees and the club brings in fags from San Francisco
to service the members' members. There are pictures of Ronald Reagan
and Arnold Schwarzenegger and George W. Bush and Richard Nixon at the
Bohemian Grove. Nixon said that it was the "faggiest thing you can
imagine."
.
|
|
|
| User: "David Morgan \MAMS" |
|
| Title: Re: THE SECRET AGENDA - Parts 1 & 2 |
09 Apr 2006 02:23:18 AM |
|
|
"Yod Vau" <flying_booger@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1144557474.561559.64860@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
JP wrote:
I believe the Iraq war is part of the Spiritual Hierarchy's
plan to establish "universal democracy and a cooperation of all nations in a
commonwealth of States." Manly P. Hall, who was often called "Masonry's
greatest philosopher," explained their goal in his book, The Secret Destiny
of America:
After the scandal over the murder of David Morgan around 1816, the
Masonic lodges lost credibility. President John Quincy Adams said that
they were a bunch of "devil worshippers". A short-lived Anti-Mason
party was founded to oppose the Masonic network in America.
But, it's ba-a-a-ck!
It's been back for some time. Just because they ride cute little motorcycles
in local parades and do some charitable things for their communities, doesn't
vindicate the missions of their elders and historical order.
A master mason in a Blue Lodge could reach the third level and never
realize that one of the aims of Freemasonry is to destroy the Christian
church. Other aims of Masonry were to overthrow hereditary nobility and
that was done in America and France at the end of the 18th century.
Skull & Bones is an elite Masonic lodge for training the future
leadership of America to destroy organized religion by promoting "the
Fatherhood of God, the Brotherhood of Man."
I got a real 'hoot' from the Alex Jones DVD of his sneaking into Bohemian
Grove and filming the "Creamation Of Care" ceremony... wherein a child
is (mock?) sacrificed to the pagan god Molech and which supposedly releases
the attendees from any guilt as a result of their life's actions. Of course, Google
search brings up one of Alex's websites first, but there is extensive historical
data on the ritual and cult http://www.infowars.com/exclusive_new_bg.htm.
http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/bohemian_grove.html
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi/newstart/bohemian-grove/
http://www.rotten.com/library/conspiracy/bohemian-grove/
http://www.sonomacountyfreepress.com/bohos/bohofact.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cremation_of_Care
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Grove
Old history:
http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/bestvintage/photogallery_02.html
Needless to say, there is plenty to be found on the subject for digestion.
Molech:
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=718&letter=M
http://www.themystica.com/mythical-folk/articles/molech.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molech
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/Moloch
http://www.crossroad.to/glossary/rpg/molech.htm
http://www.answers.com/topic/moloch
I have avoided referencing the hundreds of Christian affiliated web sites
that refer to Molech, as many have widely differing interpretations of and
references to the subject... many seem distorted to particular religions.
God becomes a loving father, replacing the vengeful Yahweh of the Old
Testament who wants to punish sinners and destroy the world everytime
he gets *****.
Yahweh is Jesus Christ (Jeshua bin Joseph)... and if anyone actually
reads the older Bibles, there is no stronger teacher of peace and love.
There is simply nothing taught by Jesus Christ that smacks of anger,
hate or revenge.
It is the later *interpreters* of the various versions of the bible who
feel that instilling FEAR is the only way to control their congregations
and have them become subservient enough to go to was and kill for
the cause of their so-called 'religion'.
The infamous coffin symbolizes the 3rd initiation step of Blue Lodge
Freemasonry, where Hiram Abiff is "resurrected" from the dead after the
three apprentice masons symbolically kill him.
There are only 29 degrees to go through after that to get to the Mystic
Shrine where you learn that god is actually a moon rock in a tent in
Mecca and that the moon fills up with souls every month and then the
souls are pumped over to the sun at full moon.
Once you've finally figured out that the ancient god of the Hebrews was
just an Egyptian *sun god* named Yao, there's no judgement day to worry
about, so you can get on with making as much money as you want by
exploiting people. There's no heaven above and no hell below.
This seems to be exactly where out leaders are sitting... But isn't it an
extremely difficult concept to grasp? Almost impossible for the average,
innocent-thinking human being. One could never imagine, sane world
leaders, engaging in rituals... the the proof is there.
Unless you really *want* there to be a heaven and a hell and a god and
a devil and all the other polar opposites.
Freemasonry offers all the rituals any Pharisee or Puritan could ever
want. It offers acesticism, if that's your bag, but being a libertine
is OK too, once you realize that some of the pantheon of Egyptian gods
were fertility gods like Atum who created the world by masturbating.
And what exactly is in the golden cup of abominations referred to in
Revelation 17:4?
Freemasons and Gnostics would know. Yuck!
There are icthyphallic representations of the Egyptian fertility god
Amun at the temple of Karnak, too. Akhenaten and Tutunkhamen both
got killed over the theological wars between advocates of Ra, the sun
god, and Amun, the fertility god.
And what the heck does an obelisk or the Washington monument
represent, anyway, if not an erect penis?
But, how could the ancient Hebrew priests tell the young Israelite
bachelors about Egyptian theology and still keep their tribe together
when there were the Earth worship rituals every spring. They had to
keep their young men out of the woods during the first full moon of
springtime to keep the tribes together.
That hasn't stopped George W. Bush from going into the woods though.
Bohemian Grove is another mystery cult where the political elite
supposedly wander around amongst the trees like druids, wearing robes
and pissing on the trees and the club brings in fags from San Francisco
to service the members' members. There are pictures of Ronald Reagan
and Arnold Schwarzenegger and George W. Bush and Richard Nixon at the
Bohemian Grove. Nixon said that it was the "faggiest thing you can
imagine."
It's damned difficult to believe....
.
|
|
|
| User: "Yod Vau" |
|
| Title: Re: THE SECRET AGENDA - Parts 1 & 2 |
09 Apr 2006 12:35:49 PM |
|
|
David Morgan (MAMS) wrote:
"Yod Vau" <flying_booger@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1144557474.561559.64860@t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
After the scandal over the murder of David Morgan around 1816, the
Masonic lodges lost credibility. President John Quincy Adams said that
they were a bunch of "devil worshippers". A short-lived Anti-Mason
party was founded to oppose the Masonic network in America.
But, it's ba-a-a-ck!
It's been back for some time. Just because they ride cute little motorcycles
in local parades and do some charitable things for their communities, doesn't
vindicate the missions of their elders and historical order.
There's a website somewhere that explains that the origin of the term
"mason" comes from a
German word that means "table".Everybody knows about King Arthur and
the Knights of the Round Table. A group of just men was supposed to
meet and solve the problems of England in the feudal period.
"Free Thinkers" in Germany would meet in secret and discuss political
or theological issues in secret because the Roman Catholic Church was
so controlling of what people believed. A "Free Thinker" wasn't just a
liberal, he was an atheist. Masonry is aimed at ending the initiates
belief in any god whatever.
Financial round tables met in England in 1929 to discuss the economic
situation in Europe. It was determined that Europe needed the gold
reserves of the United States to support their currency. So Americans
could no longer own gold, $500 million in gold was sent to Europe, and
the Great depression started.
The idea of a round table discussion held publically to find a
concensus amongst intelligent people is a worthy idea. But secret round
tables hatch conspiracies. There are more round tables in existence
than just the Masons or the Bohemian Grove clubs. There's also the
Council on Foreign Relations and the Tri-Lateral Commission and the
Bilderbergers plotting the course of our future.
I first began to realize that there was something really *wrong* with
our forign policy when Richard Nixon met with the communist Chinese and
the Russians in 1971 to end the war in Viet Nam. After all the Cold War
rhetoric and arms race that the Republicons had promoted, there was
Nixon going over there with his hat in his hand and sucking up to them.
There was a program on the History Channel about all the presidents
yesterday. They said that Nixon was playing the Chinese and the
Russians off against each other.
The most noticeable feature of that era for the American working class
was the de-valuation of US money as Nixon decided to "float" the dollar
against foreign currencies previously regulated by the Breton Woods
Agreement (another secret round table). Suddenly the price of a
Volkwagen doubled, and the British auto manufacturing industry was
ruined, but Japanese cars began to flood the market.
Then there was the matter of figuring out how to fund the Iranian
military arms buildup in 1973 so Iran could be the United States'
military surrogate in the region. The Shah told Kissinger that Iran
couldn't avoid to buy jet fighters. Kissinger said that the American
public would pay for the jets as the price of oil was manipulated.
God becomes a loving father, replacing the vengeful Yahweh of the Old
Testament who wants to punish sinners and destroy the world everytime
he gets *****.
and if anyone actually
reads the older Bibles, there is no stronger teacher of peace and love.
There is simply nothing taught by Jesus Christ that smacks of anger,
hate or revenge.
The Jews did not accept Jesus as the promised Messiah because the
Messiah was supposed to be a "priestly warrior king" according to
prophecy. When the disciples believed that they might be arrested for
following Jesus they acquired swords. But Jesus told Peter to put
downhis sword in the garden of Gethsemane.
However, there is an apochyphal story where Jesus is suposed to have
told his apostles to practice sticking their sword into a wall before
sticking it into a man.
Yahweh is Jesus Christ (Jeshua bin Joseph)...
Sorry. That theory degrades Jesus Christ, who, if you believe in the
Holy Trinity is part of a much more powerful god than the Yahweh of
Mystery.
Yahweh was created, along with other gods by The Word of God, which
means that creation was accomplished by force of Will alone.
Yahweh is "The Being" who is also called "Samael" or "Sanklas".
Yahweh is not a nice Being, he has fits of anger and torments the
lesser creatures which he blindly created. Yahweh is an artisan, a
craftsman who only works with material things. Yahweh is not brilliant,
he cannot perceive the other gods around him and they poke fun at him.
They call Yahweh "the fool".
If you don't find that in whatever version of the Bible you have
available, it's because the elders of the early Christian church
censored the Bible, burning texts that they didn't want priests to
read.
Although Bereshith ("In The Beginning" or "Genesis") appears first in
the Torah or the various versions of the Bible, there are ideas and
legends that explain Genesis and the meaning of the story of the Tree
of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
There was *no apple*. Eve was not seduced by a "serpent" she was
introduced to Bi-Polar Philosphy by a shaman of the Ophidians. They
worshipped snakes. The shaman might have been named Nacaash.
There used to be thirteen constellation in the zodiac. The
constellation which doesn't appear anymore is Ophicius the Serpent. The
ancient astrologers didn't like snake worship.
The tree wasn't a literal tree, it symbolized religious philosophy that
was being criticized as not leading directly back to The Light of God.
The debate was about Monism versus Bi-Polar philosphy. Adam's shame was
not that God saw his weiner. After all, God created Adam's weiner,
didn't he?
Well, no. Adam didn't *need* a weiner. Adam was sexless and so was Eve,
his companion. Adam just needed Eve to keep from being lonesome, they
didn't have sex in the garden of Eden.
Adam's real shame was that he had been *incarnated* by adopting
Bi-Polar Philosophy and was trapped within his own flesh. Adam now had
to live with his own bodily waste inside of him and Eve had to deliver
her children out of her own disgusting body, instead of creating them
by force of her own will.
Yeshua bin Yussuf was named after Yeshua (Joshua) who was called the
"savior" of the Israelites. Mose died before entering Canaan, so Yeshua
led the people, saving them.
Interestingly, Yussuf was a builder, not a carpenter. He was a stone
worker, as were the Operative Masons who began the guild of stone
masons. What occult secrets did Yussuf know, to impart to Yeshua?
The Hebrews were originally a wandering tribe of nomads. The term
"hebrew" seems to mean "pariah" or "outcast". They lurked at the edges
of camps of other nomads, stealing or trading as it was advantageous
and their shamans sold magical spells and charms and laid curses upon
enemies.
It's uncertain as to exactly *why* the Hebrews were in Egypt, whether
they were really slaves or if they were mercenaries, in the pay of the
pharoah.
There is a stele in Thebes (modern Luxor) that has an inscription
referring to "Jeu, god of the Sashans."
The "Sashans" were probably the Hebrews. They were a nomad tribe,
essentially undifferentiated from the other nomadic tribes. Many tribes
in the region referred to their invisible god as "Yah" or "Yao" or as
"El".
Since there are consonantal vowels in Hebrew, "Yao" would be spelled as
"Yod Vau". "Yao" would basically mean "The Being"
Everybody knows the story in Exodus about how Moses went up on the
mountain in Sinai, and encountered the burning bush and a voice spoke
to him from the bush and said, "I am that I am", which is interpreted
as "I am what I am" or "I exist eternally" or that "I am existing and
will always exist", or whatever.
You may remember that Abram became sanctified when he made his
convenant of circumcision with God in exchnage for being the father of
a great nation. So an "H" or "Heh" was added to his name and he became
Abraham instead. Since Sarai was the mother of Isaac, she became
"Sarah".
So, when you look at Hebrew texts where you would expect to see the
letters "Yod Vau", you see "Yod Heh Vau Heh" or JHVH instead. "Yod Vau"
is sanctified and mystified by the addition of the two "Heh" letters.
But a Jew would read those letters as "ehyeh asher ehyeh", instead of
saying "Yao". It's forbidden for Jews to "take the name of the lord thy
God in vain", so observant Jews haven't been allowed to say "Yao" since
the days that Boaz married Ruth, when it was still being used in
ordinary conversation.
The letters "Yod Heh Vau Heh" are called the Tetragrammaton, which
sounds better than "The Four Letter Word" which was once used. Or the
Jews will say "Ha Shem", meaning "The Name", or any number of other
euphemisms to avoid invoking The Being.
Christian researchers offered impoverished but literate Jews large sum
of money to get them to read JHVH out loud.
But they would refuse, saying that they simply couldn't pronounce the
letters "Yod He Vau Heh" correctly. And ancient Masoretic scribes added
markings below the letters which indicated that the vowels of "Elohim"
(the plural singular Being) or "Adonais" (the Lord) instead of just
saying "Yao".
Christian scholars puzzled upon the vowel markings and they mistakenly
came up with "Yehovah" or "Jehovah" which classic students of Greek and
Roman texts associated with "Iove" (Iovis, the singular possessive case
of Iupiter or Jupiter, the king of the Roman gods).
And then, the business aspect of using the name "Yao" must be
considered. After Moses brought the second set of tablets of the Ten
Commandments down from the mountain, they were placed in the charge of
the Levites, who were the holiest of the shamans of the tribe of
Israel.
The Levites carried the ark of the covenant wherever the tribe went.
The Levites conducted all of the blood sacrifices of the Israelites.
They had *almost*, but not quite, ceased sacrificing human beings in
the time of Abraham. The few drops of blood from a baby's boy's
circumscized penis were now enough to satisfy The Being.
Now the Levites sacrificed lambs brought to them by the faithful. They
were paid to slash the lamb's throat with a sharp knife with a perfect
edge and they collected the blood and they burned the lamb.
Afterwards, the priests were allowed to eat the holocaust (burnt
offering).
The modern kosher slaughtering of animals comes from the Levite ritual
slaughter of lambs.
When David's son Solomon built the temple on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem,
he placed the Levites in charge of the temple where the ark was now
kept. The Levites no longer had to carry the ark around, but they
guarded it in the sanctuary behind the veil.
Solomon summoned Zadok, the chief priest to organize the watches on the
temple and the ark. Zadok took charge of The Name, and kept it secret.
The Name was only spoken a few times a year, and always behind the veil
in the temple sanctuary, and only in a low voice so no one could hear.
Zadok passed The Name of the being to his son or to his protege. The
Name was not totally unknown to other priests though. St. John seems to
have been a son (or son in law) of the house of Zadok (aka the
Sadducees) who controlled the temple in Jerusalem.
How else would John know so much about the affairs of the Sanhedrin
which tried Yeshua bin Yussuf for heresy, if he wasn't a priest
himself?
The Jews caused trouble in Canaan for various different empires that
ruled it. They were deported from Israel by the Assyrians. The were
deported from Judea by the Babylonians. Finally, the Romans got tired
of the rebellious Jews and deported them from Jerusalem for the last
time.
The Romans burned the Temple of Herod and knocked down the walls. The
Sadducees lost their gig.
The Temple of herod was the only theater where Judaism was being
played.
But, could St. John allow The Name to be lost to all the new Christians
in the churches in Asia Minor, Greece and Rome?
No, John wrote "The Unveiling" (Revelation) after having a dream in a
cave on the island of Patmos, just off of Turkey. I have stood in the
church that was built over the cave and I have placed my own hand where
John laid his head to have the strange dream known as Revelation.
If it was a sin for Adam and Eve to eat of the fruit of the Tree of
Life and of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, why does John say this?
Revelation 2:7. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith
unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the
tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
Were there more philosophical trees in the garden of Eden than one? The
Apochryphal books that were not canonized by early church elders speak
of *five* trees.
Revelation 2:14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast
there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a
stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed
unto idols, and to commit fornication.
Believe it or not, there were *Buddhists* preaching in Judea and Israel
and Egypt, and the tale of Balaam and Josaphat in the Apochrypha are
about two Buddhist missionaries who were canonized as saints by the
early church before it was pointed out to them that they weren't
preaching Christianity.
Revelation 2:17. He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit
saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of
the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a
new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it.
Here, John is telling the reader of Revelation that he is going to
unveil The Name.
Revelation 3:12. Him that overcometh will I make a *pillar* in the
temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon
him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is
new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will
write upon him my new name.
Here, John is offering anybody who knows the scriptures to become a
priest, and perform
rituals in The Name of God.
When Solomon built his temple to house the ark of the covenant, he
named one pillar in front of the door "Boaz", who, as I have mentioned
previously *knew* The Name and used in in ordinary conversation. The
*other* pillar was named after a priest named Jachin.
If Boaz and Jachin are archetypal pillars of the temple, Boaz is the
"pillar of mercy" because he took pity upon the widowed Ruth and gave
his kinsman an heir through her.
Jachin is a pillar of strength or steadfastness. Jachin went into
foreign lands and brought back his knowledge of foreign religions which
were incorporated into the Jewish belief system.
Here, John fulfills his promise and symbolically reveals The Name to
anybody who can
read. The beasts describe the *shape* of the letters of the name.
Revelation 4:7. And the first beast was like a lion, and the second
beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the
fourth beast was like a flying eagle.
Revelation 4:8. And the four beasts had each of them six wings about
him; and they were full of eyes within: and they rest not day and
night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is,
and is to come.
Revelation 6:5. And when he had opened the third seal, I heard the
third beast say, Come and see. And I beheld, and lo a black horse; and
he that sat on him had a pair of balances in his hand.
Revelation 6:6. And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts
say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a
penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
King Hiram's construction crew were paid in in grain, oil, and wine,
when they built the temple of Solomon.
Revelation 22:16. I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you
these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David,
and the bright and morning star.
The morning star (Venus) is sometimes called Lucifer, bearer of the
light. Or is John saying that Jesus and Lucifer, the chief of the
fallen angels were one and the same? That verse seems to need to be
read in the original to be understood.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
