The World We Know Is Ending



 Politics > Politics-USA > The World We Know Is Ending

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 7

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

7

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Captain Compassion"
Date: 24 Oct 2006 10:54:36 AM
Object: The World We Know Is Ending
The World We Know Is Ending
Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006
It's the end of the world!! Head for the hills!!!
No, wait. Don't head for the hills—they're full of Islamist terrorist
camps. Let me put it in a slightly bigger nutshell: much of what we
loosely call the Western world will not survive the twenty-first
century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our
lifetimes, including many if not most European countries. There'll
probably still be a geographical area on the map marked as Italy or
the Netherlands—probably—just as in Istanbul there's still a building
known as Hagia Sophia, or St. Sophia's Cathedral. But it's not a
cathedral; it's merely a designation for a piece of real estate.
Likewise, Italy and the Netherlands will merely be designations for
real estate.
With respect to Francis Fukuyama, it's not the end of history; it's
the end of the world as we know it. Whether we like what replaces it
depends on whether America can summon the will to shape at least part
of the emerging world. If not, then it's also the end of the American
moment, and the dawn of the new Dark Ages (if darkness can dawn): a
planet on which much of the map is re-primitivized.
People Power
If your school has two hundred guys and you're playing a school with
two thousand pupils, it doesn't mean your baseball team is definitely
going to lose, but it certainly gives the other fellows a big starting
advantage.
Likewise, if you want to launch a revolution, it's not very likely if
you've only got seven revolutionaries. And they're all over eighty.
But if you've got two million and seven revolutionaries and they're
all under thirty, you're in business.
I wonder how many pontificators on the "Middle East peace process"
ever run this number: the median age in the Gaza Strip is 15.8 years.
Once you know that, all the rest is details. If you were a "moderate
Palestinian" leader, would you want to try to persuade a nation—or
pseudo-nation—of unemployed poorly educated teenage boys raised in a
UN-supervised European-funded death cult to see sense? Any analysis of
the "Palestinian problem" that doesn't take into account the most
important determinant on the ground is a waste of time.
Likewise, the salient feature of Europe, Canada, Japan, and Russia is
that they're running out of babies. What's happening in the developed
world is one of the fastest demographic evolutions in history. Most of
us have seen a gazillion heartwarming ethnic comedies—"My Big Fat
Greek Wedding" and its ilk—in which some uptight WASPy type starts
dating a gal from a vast, loving, fecund Mediterranean family, so
abundantly endowed with sisters and cousins and uncles that you can
barely get in the room.
It is, in fact, the inversion of the truth. Greece has a fertility
rate hovering just below 1.3 births per couple, which is what
demographers call the point of "lowest-low" fertility from which no
human society has ever recovered. And Greece's fertility is the
healthiest in Mediterranean Europe: Italy has a fertility rate of 1.2,
Spain, 1.1.
Insofar as any citizens of the developed world have "big" families
these days, it's the Anglo democracies: America's fertility rate is
2.1, New Zealand's a little below. Hollywood should be making "My Big
Fat Uptight Protestant Wedding," in which some sad Greek only-child
marries into a big heartwarming New Zealand family where the spouse
actually has a sibling.
As I say, this isn't a projection—it's happening now. There's no need
to extrapolate, and if you do it gets a little freaky, but, just for
fun, here goes: by 2050, 60 percent of Italians will have no brothers,
no sisters, no cousins, no aunts, no uncles. The big Italian family,
with papa pouring the vino and mama spooning out the pasta down an
endless table of grandparents and nieces and nephews, will be gone, no
more, dead as the dinosaurs.
Experts talk about root causes. But demography is the most basic root
of all. Many of the developed world's citizens gave no conscious
thought to Islam before September 11. Now we switch on the news every
evening and, though there are many trouble spots around the world, as
a general rule it's easy to make an educated guess at one of the
participants: Muslims vs. Jews in "Palestine," Muslims vs. Hindus in
Kashmir, Muslims vs. Christians in Africa, Muslims vs. Buddhists in
Thailand, Muslims vs. Russians in the Caucasus, Muslims vs.
backpacking tourists in Bali, Muslims vs. Danish cartoonists in
Scandinavia.
The environmentalists may claim to think globally but act locally, but
these guys live it. They open up a new front somewhere on the planet
with nary a thought.
Why? Because they've got the manpower.
Russia's collapsing and it's nothing to do with deforestation. It's
not the tree, it's the family tree. It's the babes in the wood. A
people that won't multiply can't go forth or go anywhere. Those who do
will shape the age we live in. Because, when history comes a-calling,
it starts with the most basic question of all: Knock-knock. Who's
there?
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.

User: "Jeffrey Turner"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 24 Oct 2006 03:34:13 PM
Captain Compassion wrote:

The World We Know Is Ending
Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006

Run away, Chicken Little!
--Jeff
--
Not ignorance, but ignorance of ignorance,
is the death of knowledge.
-Alfred North Whitehead
.
User: "PerfectlyAble"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 25 Oct 2006 12:09:56 PM
Jeffrey Turner wrote:

Captain Compassion wrote:

The World We Know Is Ending
Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006


Run away, Chicken Little!

Yeah, too Mars. Why the hell aren't we there already.
We should be building nasty nuclear reactors, and
all types of low g fusion test engines. All with
small highly intelligent robots, remotely ordered
from Earth. Why aren't we considering creating
a huge carpet of reflecting material placed in
front of Venus to cool it down and reflect the light
on Mar giving it a second sun. Atleast get up there
and experience the problems so that one day
a new generation can solve it.
No, in our world today we just have a head in the
sand Republicianism. They laid a huge cowpat
and then went into total denial burying their head
up there arse under the sand where nobody could see.


--Jeff

--
Not ignorance, but ignorance of ignorance,
is the death of knowledge.
-Alfred North Whitehead

.


User: "POIUYT"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 07 Nov 2006 01:59:08 PM
I REALLY HATE to agree with you, but you are, indeed, right.
Unless we as a nation WAKE UP and see the threat for what it is, everything
you suggest will happen.
"Captain Compassion" <daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote in message
news:i2dsj25sn10qho8sqclbgo056cs8e4tb5o@4ax.com...

The World We Know Is Ending
Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006

It's the end of the world!! Head for the hills!!!

No, wait. Don't head for the hills-they're full of Islamist terrorist
camps. Let me put it in a slightly bigger nutshell: much of what we
loosely call the Western world will not survive the twenty-first
century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our
lifetimes, including many if not most European countries. There'll
probably still be a geographical area on the map marked as Italy or
the Netherlands-probably-just as in Istanbul there's still a building
known as Hagia Sophia, or St. Sophia's Cathedral. But it's not a
cathedral; it's merely a designation for a piece of real estate.
Likewise, Italy and the Netherlands will merely be designations for
real estate.

With respect to Francis Fukuyama, it's not the end of history; it's
the end of the world as we know it. Whether we like what replaces it
depends on whether America can summon the will to shape at least part
of the emerging world. If not, then it's also the end of the American
moment, and the dawn of the new Dark Ages (if darkness can dawn): a
planet on which much of the map is re-primitivized.

People Power

If your school has two hundred guys and you're playing a school with
two thousand pupils, it doesn't mean your baseball team is definitely
going to lose, but it certainly gives the other fellows a big starting
advantage.

Likewise, if you want to launch a revolution, it's not very likely if
you've only got seven revolutionaries. And they're all over eighty.
But if you've got two million and seven revolutionaries and they're
all under thirty, you're in business.

I wonder how many pontificators on the "Middle East peace process"
ever run this number: the median age in the Gaza Strip is 15.8 years.

Once you know that, all the rest is details. If you were a "moderate
Palestinian" leader, would you want to try to persuade a nation-or
pseudo-nation-of unemployed poorly educated teenage boys raised in a
UN-supervised European-funded death cult to see sense? Any analysis of
the "Palestinian problem" that doesn't take into account the most
important determinant on the ground is a waste of time.

Likewise, the salient feature of Europe, Canada, Japan, and Russia is
that they're running out of babies. What's happening in the developed
world is one of the fastest demographic evolutions in history. Most of
us have seen a gazillion heartwarming ethnic comedies-"My Big Fat
Greek Wedding" and its ilk-in which some uptight WASPy type starts
dating a gal from a vast, loving, fecund Mediterranean family, so
abundantly endowed with sisters and cousins and uncles that you can
barely get in the room.

It is, in fact, the inversion of the truth. Greece has a fertility
rate hovering just below 1.3 births per couple, which is what
demographers call the point of "lowest-low" fertility from which no
human society has ever recovered. And Greece's fertility is the
healthiest in Mediterranean Europe: Italy has a fertility rate of 1.2,
Spain, 1.1.

Insofar as any citizens of the developed world have "big" families
these days, it's the Anglo democracies: America's fertility rate is
2.1, New Zealand's a little below. Hollywood should be making "My Big
Fat Uptight Protestant Wedding," in which some sad Greek only-child
marries into a big heartwarming New Zealand family where the spouse
actually has a sibling.

As I say, this isn't a projection-it's happening now. There's no need
to extrapolate, and if you do it gets a little freaky, but, just for
fun, here goes: by 2050, 60 percent of Italians will have no brothers,
no sisters, no cousins, no aunts, no uncles. The big Italian family,
with papa pouring the vino and mama spooning out the pasta down an
endless table of grandparents and nieces and nephews, will be gone, no
more, dead as the dinosaurs.

Experts talk about root causes. But demography is the most basic root
of all. Many of the developed world's citizens gave no conscious
thought to Islam before September 11. Now we switch on the news every
evening and, though there are many trouble spots around the world, as
a general rule it's easy to make an educated guess at one of the
participants: Muslims vs. Jews in "Palestine," Muslims vs. Hindus in
Kashmir, Muslims vs. Christians in Africa, Muslims vs. Buddhists in
Thailand, Muslims vs. Russians in the Caucasus, Muslims vs.
backpacking tourists in Bali, Muslims vs. Danish cartoonists in
Scandinavia.

The environmentalists may claim to think globally but act locally, but
these guys live it. They open up a new front somewhere on the planet
with nary a thought.

Why? Because they've got the manpower.

Russia's collapsing and it's nothing to do with deforestation. It's
not the tree, it's the family tree. It's the babes in the wood. A
people that won't multiply can't go forth or go anywhere. Those who do
will shape the age we live in. Because, when history comes a-calling,
it starts with the most basic question of all: Knock-knock. Who's
there?

--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance

"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.


"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant

Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net

.
User: "Bob uecker"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 07 Nov 2006 02:03:25 PM
"POIUYT" <poiuyt@papernapkin.net> wrote in message
news:fA54h.106264$eE7.14249@newsfe19.lga...

I REALLY HATE to agree with you, but you are, indeed, right.

Unless we as a nation WAKE UP and see the threat for what it is,
everything you suggest will happen.


"Captain Compassion" <daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote in message
news:i2dsj25sn10qho8sqclbgo056cs8e4tb5o@4ax.com...

The World We Know Is Ending
Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006

It's the end of the world!! Head for the hills!!!

No, wait. Don't head for the hills-they're full of Islamist terrorist
camps. Let me put it in a slightly bigger nutshell: much of what we
loosely call the Western world will not survive the twenty-first
century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our
lifetimes, including many if not most European countries. There'll
probably still be a geographical area on the map marked as Italy or
the Netherlands-probably-just as in Istanbul there's still a building
known as Hagia Sophia, or St. Sophia's Cathedral. But it's not a
cathedral; it's merely a designation for a piece of real estate.
Likewise, Italy and the Netherlands will merely be designations for
real estate.

With respect to Francis Fukuyama, it's not the end of history; it's
the end of the world as we know it. Whether we like what replaces it
depends on whether America can summon the will to shape at least part
of the emerging world. If not, then it's also the end of the American
moment, and the dawn of the new Dark Ages (if darkness can dawn): a
planet on which much of the map is re-primitivized.

People Power

If your school has two hundred guys and you're playing a school with
two thousand pupils, it doesn't mean your baseball team is definitely
going to lose, but it certainly gives the other fellows a big starting
advantage.

Likewise, if you want to launch a revolution, it's not very likely if
you've only got seven revolutionaries. And they're all over eighty.
But if you've got two million and seven revolutionaries and they're
all under thirty, you're in business.

I wonder how many pontificators on the "Middle East peace process"
ever run this number: the median age in the Gaza Strip is 15.8 years.

Once you know that, all the rest is details. If you were a "moderate
Palestinian" leader, would you want to try to persuade a nation-or
pseudo-nation-of unemployed poorly educated teenage boys raised in a
UN-supervised European-funded death cult to see sense? Any analysis of
the "Palestinian problem" that doesn't take into account the most
important determinant on the ground is a waste of time.

Likewise, the salient feature of Europe, Canada, Japan, and Russia is
that they're running out of babies. What's happening in the developed
world is one of the fastest demographic evolutions in history. Most of
us have seen a gazillion heartwarming ethnic comedies-"My Big Fat
Greek Wedding" and its ilk-in which some uptight WASPy type starts
dating a gal from a vast, loving, fecund Mediterranean family, so
abundantly endowed with sisters and cousins and uncles that you can
barely get in the room.

It is, in fact, the inversion of the truth. Greece has a fertility
rate hovering just below 1.3 births per couple, which is what
demographers call the point of "lowest-low" fertility from which no
human society has ever recovered. And Greece's fertility is the
healthiest in Mediterranean Europe: Italy has a fertility rate of 1.2,
Spain, 1.1.

Insofar as any citizens of the developed world have "big" families
these days, it's the Anglo democracies: America's fertility rate is
2.1, New Zealand's a little below. Hollywood should be making "My Big
Fat Uptight Protestant Wedding," in which some sad Greek only-child
marries into a big heartwarming New Zealand family where the spouse
actually has a sibling.

As I say, this isn't a projection-it's happening now. There's no need
to extrapolate, and if you do it gets a little freaky, but, just for
fun, here goes: by 2050, 60 percent of Italians will have no brothers,
no sisters, no cousins, no aunts, no uncles. The big Italian family,
with papa pouring the vino and mama spooning out the pasta down an
endless table of grandparents and nieces and nephews, will be gone, no
more, dead as the dinosaurs.

Experts talk about root causes. But demography is the most basic root
of all. Many of the developed world's citizens gave no conscious
thought to Islam before September 11. Now we switch on the news every
evening and, though there are many trouble spots around the world, as
a general rule it's easy to make an educated guess at one of the
participants: Muslims vs. Jews in "Palestine," Muslims vs. Hindus in
Kashmir, Muslims vs. Christians in Africa, Muslims vs. Buddhists in
Thailand, Muslims vs. Russians in the Caucasus, Muslims vs.
backpacking tourists in Bali, Muslims vs. Danish cartoonists in
Scandinavia.

The environmentalists may claim to think globally but act locally, but
these guys live it. They open up a new front somewhere on the planet
with nary a thought.

Why? Because they've got the manpower.

Russia's collapsing and it's nothing to do with deforestation. It's
not the tree, it's the family tree. It's the babes in the wood. A
people that won't multiply can't go forth or go anywhere. Those who do
will shape the age we live in. Because, when history comes a-calling,
it starts with the most basic question of all: Knock-knock. Who's
there?

--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS

"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance

"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.

A bunch of pussyb ***** rambling nonesnece. Typical Americna cowardice. Just
kill yourselves off then. You people are disgusting. Cowards, fat slobs,
racists, retards. Thats about the size of all you. Highly agressive
criminaly stupid and to lazy a change a TV channel. Pathetic fucking slime.
.


User: "B1ackwater"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 24 Oct 2006 04:32:00 PM
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:54:36 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

The World We Know Is Ending

"The world we know" ends every day ... replaced by
a fresh one the next morning.

Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006

It's the end of the world!! Head for the hills!!!

No, wait. Don't head for the hills—they're full of Islamist terrorist
camps. Let me put it in a slightly bigger nutshell: much of what we
loosely call the Western world will not survive the twenty-first
century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our
lifetimes, including many if not most European countries.

The biggest change will be cause by China - sucking up jobs
and money like a black hole. It can already match western
nations in many endeavours. Our only remaining advantage
lies in bleeding-edge technology - and that's not enough
to float entire countries. What all this means is that
the west will become noticibly poorer - and with less
money comes less confidence, less ability to resist foes,
less period.
Islam WILL make inroads in europe. It already has the
French eating out of its bloody hand. Through intimidation
the Islamic fraction will gain disproportional influence
in european politics. While I doubt we'll see europe as
one big islamic state, it will have a considerably more
islamic flavor and outlook.
The USA is pretty safe from direct islamic influence, but
it will have to DEAL with both the core islamic nations
and the "islam-lite" of europe. As infidels - and poorer
than we used to be - we're gonna have a tougher time
of it. We'll start getting crappier trade deals - and
have to be thankful for what we can get. We won't get
much in the way of moral or physical support from
europe either - NATO will fade away as will many
old 'understandings' between nations. It will be
us, Russia and maybe England ... the rest will orbit
either Mecca or Bejing.
Dunno about Mexico and S.America yet ... they may
form a weaker distinct fourth bloc, come closer to
us or be bought by China.
Later on, MUCH later, China will fall victim to the same
social and economic factors that now weaken us. It will
become jaded, lazy, uncompetitive and apathetic. Islam
will at first become more unified - and then the internal
conflicts will begin. Nothing more dangerous than success.
So, if we just wait a hundred years or so, our time will
come again. A cheerful outlook dontchathink ? :-)
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 24 Oct 2006 07:28:41 PM
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:32:00 GMT,
(B1ackwater) wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:54:36 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

The World We Know Is Ending


"The world we know" ends every day ... replaced by
a fresh one the next morning.

Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006

It's the end of the world!! Head for the hills!!!

No, wait. Don't head for the hills—they're full of Islamist terrorist
camps. Let me put it in a slightly bigger nutshell: much of what we
loosely call the Western world will not survive the twenty-first
century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our
lifetimes, including many if not most European countries.


The biggest change will be cause by China - sucking up jobs
and money like a black hole. It can already match western
nations in many endeavours. Our only remaining advantage
lies in bleeding-edge technology - and that's not enough
to float entire countries. What all this means is that
the west will become noticibly poorer - and with less
money comes less confidence, less ability to resist foes,
less period.

Islam WILL make inroads in europe. It already has the
French eating out of its bloody hand. Through intimidation
the Islamic fraction will gain disproportional influence
in european politics. While I doubt we'll see europe as
one big islamic state, it will have a considerably more
islamic flavor and outlook.

The USA is pretty safe from direct islamic influence, but
it will have to DEAL with both the core islamic nations
and the "islam-lite" of europe. As infidels - and poorer
than we used to be - we're gonna have a tougher time
of it. We'll start getting crappier trade deals - and
have to be thankful for what we can get. We won't get
much in the way of moral or physical support from
europe either - NATO will fade away as will many
old 'understandings' between nations. It will be
us, Russia and maybe England ... the rest will orbit
either Mecca or Bejing.

Dunno about Mexico and S.America yet ... they may
form a weaker distinct fourth bloc, come closer to
us or be bought by China.

Later on, MUCH later, China will fall victim to the same
social and economic factors that now weaken us. It will
become jaded, lazy, uncompetitive and apathetic. Islam
will at first become more unified - and then the internal
conflicts will begin. Nothing more dangerous than success.
So, if we just wait a hundred years or so, our time will
come again. A cheerful outlook dontchathink ? :-)

The problem with China is it produces goods and services that the
majority of it's people can't afford. The GDP - per capita is less
than 66% of that of Mexico. Another problem is that the majority of
stuff they produce can be produced in even cheaper places.
China remains firmly in the third world with a Communist government to
boot. I do expect that China to export more of their excess males to
the west.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
User: "B1ackwater"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 25 Oct 2006 07:02:23 AM
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:28:41 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:32:00 GMT,

(B1ackwater) wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:54:36 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

The World We Know Is Ending


"The world we know" ends every day ... replaced by
a fresh one the next morning.

Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006

It's the end of the world!! Head for the hills!!!

No, wait. Don't head for the hills—they're full of Islamist terrorist
camps. Let me put it in a slightly bigger nutshell: much of what we
loosely call the Western world will not survive the twenty-first
century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our
lifetimes, including many if not most European countries.


The biggest change will be cause by China - sucking up jobs
and money like a black hole. It can already match western
nations in many endeavours. Our only remaining advantage
lies in bleeding-edge technology - and that's not enough
to float entire countries. What all this means is that
the west will become noticibly poorer - and with less
money comes less confidence, less ability to resist foes,
less period.

Islam WILL make inroads in europe. It already has the
French eating out of its bloody hand. Through intimidation
the Islamic fraction will gain disproportional influence
in european politics. While I doubt we'll see europe as
one big islamic state, it will have a considerably more
islamic flavor and outlook.

The USA is pretty safe from direct islamic influence, but
it will have to DEAL with both the core islamic nations
and the "islam-lite" of europe. As infidels - and poorer
than we used to be - we're gonna have a tougher time
of it. We'll start getting crappier trade deals - and
have to be thankful for what we can get. We won't get
much in the way of moral or physical support from
europe either - NATO will fade away as will many
old 'understandings' between nations. It will be
us, Russia and maybe England ... the rest will orbit
either Mecca or Bejing.

Dunno about Mexico and S.America yet ... they may
form a weaker distinct fourth bloc, come closer to
us or be bought by China.

Later on, MUCH later, China will fall victim to the same
social and economic factors that now weaken us. It will
become jaded, lazy, uncompetitive and apathetic. Islam
will at first become more unified - and then the internal
conflicts will begin. Nothing more dangerous than success.
So, if we just wait a hundred years or so, our time will
come again. A cheerful outlook dontchathink ? :-)


The problem with China is it produces goods and services that the
majority of it's people can't afford. The GDP - per capita is less
than 66% of that of Mexico. Another problem is that the majority of
stuff they produce can be produced in even cheaper places.

I see this as a deliberate business strategy - akin to what
we saw from Japan in the 50s and early 60s (and up through
the 80s when it came to automobiles). Underpay your workers
so you can absolutely positively under-sell anyone else in
the world - and drive those competitors out of business.
THEN you can raise prices - and wages at home.

China remains firmly in the third world with a Communist government to
boot. I do expect that China to export more of their excess males to
the west.

They will ... as businessmen though, not refugees. China
will need a lot of people to control its growing business
empire. Won't be long before seeing Chinese names at the
top of managerial charts is common in America.
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 25 Oct 2006 11:01:26 AM
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:02:23 GMT,
(B1ackwater) wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:28:41 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:32:00 GMT,

(B1ackwater) wrote:

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:54:36 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

The World We Know Is Ending


"The world we know" ends every day ... replaced by
a fresh one the next morning.

Mark Steyn
Tuesday, Oct. 24, 2006

It's the end of the world!! Head for the hills!!!

No, wait. Don't head for the hills—they're full of Islamist terrorist
camps. Let me put it in a slightly bigger nutshell: much of what we
loosely call the Western world will not survive the twenty-first
century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our
lifetimes, including many if not most European countries.


The biggest change will be cause by China - sucking up jobs
and money like a black hole. It can already match western
nations in many endeavours. Our only remaining advantage
lies in bleeding-edge technology - and that's not enough
to float entire countries. What all this means is that
the west will become noticibly poorer - and with less
money comes less confidence, less ability to resist foes,
less period.

Islam WILL make inroads in europe. It already has the
French eating out of its bloody hand. Through intimidation
the Islamic fraction will gain disproportional influence
in european politics. While I doubt we'll see europe as
one big islamic state, it will have a considerably more
islamic flavor and outlook.

The USA is pretty safe from direct islamic influence, but
it will have to DEAL with both the core islamic nations
and the "islam-lite" of europe. As infidels - and poorer
than we used to be - we're gonna have a tougher time
of it. We'll start getting crappier trade deals - and
have to be thankful for what we can get. We won't get
much in the way of moral or physical support from
europe either - NATO will fade away as will many
old 'understandings' between nations. It will be
us, Russia and maybe England ... the rest will orbit
either Mecca or Bejing.

Dunno about Mexico and S.America yet ... they may
form a weaker distinct fourth bloc, come closer to
us or be bought by China.

Later on, MUCH later, China will fall victim to the same
social and economic factors that now weaken us. It will
become jaded, lazy, uncompetitive and apathetic. Islam
will at first become more unified - and then the internal
conflicts will begin. Nothing more dangerous than success.
So, if we just wait a hundred years or so, our time will
come again. A cheerful outlook dontchathink ? :-)


The problem with China is it produces goods and services that the
majority of it's people can't afford. The GDP - per capita is less
than 66% of that of Mexico. Another problem is that the majority of
stuff they produce can be produced in even cheaper places.


I see this as a deliberate business strategy - akin to what
we saw from Japan in the 50s and early 60s (and up through
the 80s when it came to automobiles). Underpay your workers
so you can absolutely positively under-sell anyone else in
the world - and drive those competitors out of business.
THEN you can raise prices - and wages at home.

China remains firmly in the third world with a Communist government to
boot. I do expect that China to export more of their excess males to
the west.


They will ... as businessmen though, not refugees. China
will need a lot of people to control its growing business
empire. Won't be long before seeing Chinese names at the
top of managerial charts is common in America.

In the Chinese population 0-64 there are an excess of 43.5 million
males. This is mostly in the younger ages. China'a policy of one child
was adopted in 1979. At some point in time China will either become
the gayest country in the world or many excess males will have to seek
families elsewhere.
I don't see China becoming a any kind of threat to the US
economically. They are too people rich and resource poor. This is a
hallmark or most third world nations.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
User: ""

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 25 Oct 2006 11:41:19 AM
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:01:26 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

I don't see China becoming a any kind of threat to the US
economically.

Take your thumbs out of your eye sockets. China already is a power
player in the US economy.

They are too people rich and resource poor. This is a
hallmark or most third world nations.

Before they become first order powers.
Swill
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 25 Oct 2006 02:36:12 PM
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:41:19 -0400,
wrote:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:01:26 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

I don't see China becoming a any kind of threat to the US
economically.


Take your thumbs out of your eye sockets. China already is a power
player in the US economy.

What does China supply that can't be provided from other places?

They are too people rich and resource poor. This is a
hallmark or most third world nations.


Before they become first order powers.

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
User: "Hugh Gibbons"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 26 Oct 2006 10:47:52 PM
In article <3oevj25qbo78k8idj50gon7hcr5h5oivch@4ax.com>,
Captain Compassion <daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.

The United States?
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 27 Oct 2006 10:39:33 AM
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:47:52 -0600, Hugh Gibbons <party@myhouse.com>
wrote:

In article <3oevj25qbo78k8idj50gon7hcr5h5oivch@4ax.com>,
Captain Compassion <daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.


The United States?

The USA has never had the burden of a high population. This may
change.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
User: ""

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 28 Oct 2006 12:57:49 AM
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:39:33 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.


The United States?

The USA has never had the burden of a high population. This may
change.

I think it's imperative it change. Look what static and shrinking
population is doing to the economies of Europe and Russia.
If nothing else, swelling the workforce with young immigrants who have
lots of babies will sure help out with entitlements.
Swill
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 28 Oct 2006 11:07:46 PM
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 01:57:49 -0400,
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:39:33 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.


The United States?

The USA has never had the burden of a high population. This may
change.


I think it's imperative it change. Look what static and shrinking
population is doing to the economies of Europe and Russia.

If nothing else, swelling the workforce with young immigrants who have
lots of babies will sure help out with entitlements.

And some wonder why the US government drags it's feet on this illegal
immigrant thing. The upscale populations of first world economies have
become too sophisticated to breed.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
User: ""

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 29 Oct 2006 04:26:02 PM
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 21:07:46 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

If nothing else, swelling the workforce with young immigrants who have
lots of babies will sure help out with entitlements.

And some wonder why the US government drags it's feet on this illegal
immigrant thing. The upscale populations of first world economies have
become too sophisticated to breed.

Exactly! That's why we need to vastly increase legal immigration
_and_ secure the borders. Legalize the immigration and return us to
that production curve we enjoyed through the sixties.
Swill
--
It's about the oil, stupid.
.





User: "B1ackwater"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 25 Oct 2006 03:18:50 PM
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:36:12 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:41:19 -0400,

wrote:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:01:26 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

I don't see China becoming a any kind of threat to the US
economically.


Take your thumbs out of your eye sockets. China already is a power
player in the US economy.

What does China supply that can't be provided from other places?

Nothing - but China can provide it much CHEAPER.

They are too people rich and resource poor. This is a
hallmark or most third world nations.


Before they become first order powers.

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.

We pretty much owe the US to China right now, the amount
of money we've been borrowing. China IS a first-order
country in every respect - they just don't stand up and
crow about it. I'd rank its overall condition as 2nd
world, with pockets of 1st and 3rd. Anyway, China is
definitely worth paying attention to. Hell, they may
own yer ***** already ...
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 25 Oct 2006 07:42:00 PM
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:18:50 GMT,
(B1ackwater) wrote:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:36:12 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:41:19 -0400,

wrote:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:01:26 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

I don't see China becoming a any kind of threat to the US
economically.


Take your thumbs out of your eye sockets. China already is a power
player in the US economy.

What does China supply that can't be provided from other places?


Nothing - but China can provide it much CHEAPER.

They are too people rich and resource poor. This is a
hallmark or most third world nations.


Before they become first order powers.

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.


We pretty much owe the US to China right now, the amount
of money we've been borrowing. China IS a first-order
country in every respect - they just don't stand up and
crow about it. I'd rank its overall condition as 2nd
world, with pockets of 1st and 3rd. Anyway, China is
definitely worth paying attention to. Hell, they may
own yer ***** already ...

This is superstition. Using your theory Canada has owned the US for
many years. I remember this same BS about Japan 20 or so years ago.
China has a GDP that is 1/4 that of the US with over 4 times the
population. The Chinese GDP - per capita is less than that of the
world average.
FYI First world countries are highly developed industrial economies
such as the US, Canada, Japan and the EU countries. Second world
countries are planned socialist countries such as Cuba, North Korea
and coming soon Venezuela. Third world countries are the so called
developing countries such as South Korea, Mexico and Brazil that have
resources that give them a shot at developing themselves. Fourth world
countries are those countries that have little resources beyond a
starving population such as much of central Africa, Central America
and much of the Moslem world.
20 million man armies are no longer scary when that army only has the
ability to attack their poorer neighbors. It is more a drain on a
country than an asset.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
User: ""

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 26 Oct 2006 02:29:17 AM
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:42:00 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

We pretty much owe the US to China right now, the amount
of money we've been borrowing. China IS a first-order
country in every respect - they just don't stand up and
crow about it. I'd rank its overall condition as 2nd
world, with pockets of 1st and 3rd. Anyway, China is
definitely worth paying attention to. Hell, they may
own yer ***** already ...


This is superstition. Using your theory Canada has owned the US for
many years. I remember this same BS about Japan 20 or so years ago.
China has a GDP that is 1/4 that of the US with over 4 times the
population. The Chinese GDP - per capita is less than that of the
world average.

It's not superstition, it's exaggeration. Japan completely destroyed
America's home electronics industry. You can't buy a TV or DVD made
in this country. They don't exist. Japan has reduced Detroit's share
of the American auto market to less than GM's was in the sixties. What
do you think is going to happen to GM, Ford, Daimler-Chrysler, Toyota,
Nissan, et al when China enters the US car market in the next decade?
How is belittling or marginalizing China going to stop their growth
and presence in the world?
China's GDP may be smaller than ours today, but it's growing at four
times the rate ours is. This btw, is why we must make massive
immigration legal in this country. We need workers and consumers to
create more wealth in order to keep up.
What you seem to be missing is that what is true today isn't what is
going to be true tomorrow. China's GDP isn't always going to be a
quarter of ours or smaller than the global average. While we struggle
to keep our growth rate near a supposed ideal of 3%, China is
struggling to keep their growth rate under a mind boggling 8%.

FYI First world countries are highly developed industrial economies
such as the US, Canada, Japan and the EU countries. Second world
countries are planned socialist countries such as Cuba, North Korea
and coming soon Venezuela. Third world countries are the so called
developing countries such as South Korea, Mexico and Brazil that have
resources that give them a shot at developing themselves. Fourth world
countries are those countries that have little resources beyond a
starving population such as much of central Africa, Central America
and much of the Moslem world.

I would disagree with your ordering and your order parameters. Post
war, ordering was politically based. First world countries were once
defined as non communist, highly developed industrial nations,
particularly the non Iron Curtain participants in WWII. Second world
nations were Soviet Bloc nations. Third world nations were everybody
else.
This ordering is obsolete. These days such categories can no longer
be defined by political systems. Economic development, growth,
internal stability and religion are more important. Bush 41 spoke of
the New World Order without defining it. Growth rates, global
political clout, international networking have all replaced the old
bipolar capitalist-communist basis. In the new world order the US,
Japan and western Europe continue economic dominance but are slipping
politically as China signs contracts, invests hard currency and makes
friends among poorer nations who once looked to the US as the best or
only chance for improving their condition but now see China as a
viable partner in achieving what might be best described as the
American Dream.
I'd posit a tiered system with the G-8, EU and their closest allies at
the top and the impoverished nations of Africa at the bottom. The oil
rich Muslims states occupy their own tier. South America is doing
better than ever and Brazil leads them. It's clearly the most
prosperous and stable state in the western hemisphere excepting only
the US and Canada and they along with China are investing heavily in
South American identity and prosperity. Another tier.
The US best interests are served by ceasing our constant attempts to
control the rest of this hemisphere and focusing our attention on
close relations and mutually beneficial relationships.

20 million man armies are no longer scary when that army only has the
ability to attack their poorer neighbors. It is more a drain on a
country than an asset.

Weapons have become too efficient and destructive to allow war to
continue to be an option in disputes. The world has moved beyond 19th
century imperialism and 20th century nationalism. The tools of war
alone will guarantee the end of warfare as we've known it at least
among the powerful. If we don't recognize those changes and work to
make our place in a future unlike anything humans have ever faced,
we'll extinguish ourselves and our most precious institutions.
Swill
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 26 Oct 2006 12:00:04 PM
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 03:29:17 -0400,
wrote:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:42:00 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

We pretty much owe the US to China right now, the amount
of money we've been borrowing. China IS a first-order
country in every respect - they just don't stand up and
crow about it. I'd rank its overall condition as 2nd
world, with pockets of 1st and 3rd. Anyway, China is
definitely worth paying attention to. Hell, they may
own yer ***** already ...


This is superstition. Using your theory Canada has owned the US for
many years. I remember this same BS about Japan 20 or so years ago.
China has a GDP that is 1/4 that of the US with over 4 times the
population. The Chinese GDP - per capita is less than that of the
world average.


It's not superstition, it's exaggeration. Japan completely destroyed
America's home electronics industry. You can't buy a TV or DVD made
in this country. They don't exist. Japan has reduced Detroit's share
of the American auto market to less than GM's was in the sixties. What
do you think is going to happen to GM, Ford, Daimler-Chrysler, Toyota,
Nissan, et al when China enters the US car market in the next decade?
How is belittling or marginalizing China going to stop their growth
and presence in the world?

China's GDP may be smaller than ours today, but it's growing at four
times the rate ours is. This btw, is why we must make massive
immigration legal in this country. We need workers and consumers to
create more wealth in order to keep up.

What you seem to be missing is that what is true today isn't what is
going to be true tomorrow. China's GDP isn't always going to be a
quarter of ours or smaller than the global average. While we struggle
to keep our growth rate near a supposed ideal of 3%, China is
struggling to keep their growth rate under a mind boggling 8%.

Do you for see a 9% growth rate for China for say the next 20 years?
That would put Chinese GDP per Capita at $31,200. In the same 20 years
at 3.5% growth rate the USA per GDP per Capita to grow to $83,700. I
think the 3.5% yearly growth for the US is a much more realistic
figure than 9% yearly growth rate for China over the next 20 years.

FYI First world countries are highly developed industrial economies
such as the US, Canada, Japan and the EU countries. Second world
countries are planned socialist countries such as Cuba, North Korea
and coming soon Venezuela. Third world countries are the so called
developing countries such as South Korea, Mexico and Brazil that have
resources that give them a shot at developing themselves. Fourth world
countries are those countries that have little resources beyond a
starving population such as much of central Africa, Central America
and much of the Moslem world.


I would disagree with your ordering and your order parameters. Post
war, ordering was politically based. First world countries were once
defined as non communist, highly developed industrial nations,
particularly the non Iron Curtain participants in WWII. Second world
nations were Soviet Bloc nations. Third world nations were everybody
else.

This ordering is obsolete. These days such categories can no longer
be defined by political systems. Economic development, growth,
internal stability and religion are more important. Bush 41 spoke of
the New World Order without defining it. Growth rates, global
political clout, international networking have all replaced the old
bipolar capitalist-communist basis. In the new world order the US,
Japan and western Europe continue economic dominance but are slipping
politically as China signs contracts, invests hard currency and makes
friends among poorer nations who once looked to the US as the best or
only chance for improving their condition but now see China as a
viable partner in achieving what might be best described as the
American Dream.

I'd posit a tiered system with the G-8, EU and their closest allies at
the top and the impoverished nations of Africa at the bottom. The oil
rich Muslims states occupy their own tier. South America is doing
better than ever and Brazil leads them. It's clearly the most
prosperous and stable state in the western hemisphere excepting only
the US and Canada and they along with China are investing heavily in
South American identity and prosperity. Another tier.

The US best interests are served by ceasing our constant attempts to
control the rest of this hemisphere and focusing our attention on
close relations and mutually beneficial relationships.

20 million man armies are no longer scary when that army only has the
ability to attack their poorer neighbors. It is more a drain on a
country than an asset.


Weapons have become too efficient and destructive to allow war to
continue to be an option in disputes. The world has moved beyond 19th
century imperialism and 20th century nationalism. The tools of war
alone will guarantee the end of warfare as we've known it at least
among the powerful. If we don't recognize those changes and work to
make our place in a future unlike anything humans have ever faced,
we'll extinguish ourselves and our most precious institutions.

"The term 4th World was coined by Manuel Castells to refer to black
holes of social exclusion. 4th World is deliberately opposed to 1st
World, 2nd World and 3rd World, all of which imply a certain degree of
connectivity. This connectivity is what is notably absent in the
notion 4th World."
"Examples of places described as 4th World include Sub-Saharan Africa,
rural Latin America and innercity ghettos or banlieues. Because of
their disconnection from the rest of the world these places are
powerless, and thus unable to change. In the case of ghettos or
banlieues this disconnection stands in stark contrast with the city
centres which are the most connected spaces."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4th_World
Do not these definitions still apply to some places?
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.




User: ""

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 26 Oct 2006 01:55:21 AM
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:36:12 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

I don't see China becoming a any kind of threat to the US
economically.


Take your thumbs out of your eye sockets. China already is a power
player in the US economy.

What does China supply that can't be provided from other places?

Equity loans on a nine figure scale.

They are too people rich and resource poor. This is a
hallmark or most third world nations.


Before they become first order powers.

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.

The US was once a third order nation. A barely united conglomerate
immigrant colonists speaking a dozen languages and all scrapping for
their bit of an as yet unbaked pie.
China is a special case that cannot be compared to the banana
republics of SA or the corrupt republics of Africa. Third order
nations traditionally are addicted to revolution. China has managed
to replace revolution with evolution. That alone should be a sharp
warning to you. Evolution is slower but like the tortoise and the
hare, slow but sure wins the race.
China has a third of the world's population. Their philosophic
heritage speaks of patience and perseverance. Their government is
prepared for the modern world, understands it's workings and are
struggling to work with that system rather than destroy or overhaul
it. China enjoys the fastest growing economy in the world and it's
government, if anything, is having to struggle to slow (or pace) that
growth so it's economy doesn't explode and capsize.
China WILL BE the largest national power on the planet by the end of
this century. This is not logically arguable or a river in Egypt. The
21st Century will be China's century much as the 20th Century was
America's. Nothing can stop them short of a cosmic cataclysm of the
sort that well make nations obsolete and pointless.
Our job isn't to prevent or supercede Chinese global supremacy, but to
secure our place in the new world order that 2099 will bring and
assure we don't drown in China's propwash.
Swill
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 26 Oct 2006 11:25:17 AM
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:55:21 -0400,
wrote:

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 12:36:12 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

I don't see China becoming a any kind of threat to the US
economically.


Take your thumbs out of your eye sockets. China already is a power
player in the US economy.

What does China supply that can't be provided from other places?


Equity loans on a nine figure scale.

Equity eh? Do you see China foreclosing any time soon on Wal*Mart?

They are too people rich and resource poor. This is a
hallmark or most third world nations.


Before they become first order powers.

Which third world nation has ever became a first order power? Maybe
Russia for a while but they are back to third world. The only chance
China has is to cut their population by about 2/3.


The US was once a third order nation. A barely united conglomerate
immigrant colonists speaking a dozen languages and all scrapping for
their bit of an as yet unbaked pie.

Yet in less than 200 years the US leads the world. In the 4,000 years
of China's history the only time that they were a world power is when
they were run by a foreign power. The Mongols.

China is a special case that cannot be compared to the banana
republics of SA or the corrupt republics of Africa. Third order
nations traditionally are addicted to revolution. China has managed
to replace revolution with evolution. That alone should be a sharp
warning to you. Evolution is slower but like the tortoise and the
hare, slow but sure wins the race.

The last revolution in the US was the Civil War 145 years ago. The
first half of the 20th century was nothing but revolution in China.
The Communist (Mao) dynasty is one of a string of governments
stretching back into dim history. China takes the slow path because
they have little other choice.

China has a third of the world's population. Their philosophic
heritage speaks of patience and perseverance. Their government is
prepared for the modern world, understands it's workings and are
struggling to work with that system rather than destroy or overhaul
it. China enjoys the fastest growing economy in the world and it's
government, if anything, is having to struggle to slow (or pace) that
growth so it's economy doesn't explode and capsize.

Having 1.3 billion people when 1 billion are non productive is not a
pay window. In 2005 the Chinese GDP grew 9.9% this means that the
average Chinese citizen increased his wealth by around $600 dollars.
In the United states with a growth rate of 3.5% the average American
increased his wealth by around $1,400.
Other countries with high economic growth rates would include India at
7.6%, Afghanistan at 8% and Venezuela at 9.3%. Do you project any of
these countries becoming dominate world economies?

China WILL BE the largest national power on the planet by the end of
this century. This is not logically arguable or a river in Egypt. The
21st Century will be China's century much as the 20th Century was
America's. Nothing can stop them short of a cosmic cataclysm of the
sort that well make nations obsolete and pointless.

Our job isn't to prevent or supercede Chinese global supremacy, but to
secure our place in the new world order that 2099 will bring and
assure we don't drown in China's propwash.

LOL!
"We will bury you!" -- Nikita Khrushchev Chairman of the former USSR.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
User: ""

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 26 Oct 2006 11:42:21 PM
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:25:17 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

What does China supply that can't be provided from other places?


Equity loans on a nine figure scale.

Equity eh? Do you see China foreclosing any time soon on Wal*Mart?

Do you see Wal Mart voluntarily raising it's costs and prices in order
to gain the good will of consumers irrationally threatened by China?

The US was once a third order nation. A barely united conglomerate
immigrant colonists speaking a dozen languages and all scrapping for
their bit of an as yet unbaked pie.

Yet in less than 200 years the US leads the world.

China will do it much sooner.

In the 4,000 years
of China's history the only time that they were a world power is when
they were run by a foreign power. The Mongols.

Sophisticated urban civilization in China predates the Greeks and can
be traced back as far as Egypt's middle kingdom. Until the
Renaissance China was also a leader in technological development.
Chinese medicine was more highly developed than anything Europe knew
before the 18th century. Their astronomical observations exceed in
detail the state of the art in western culture until the renaissance.

The last revolution in the US was the Civil War 145 years ago. The
first half of the 20th century was nothing but revolution in China.
The Communist (Mao) dynasty is one of a string of governments
stretching back into dim history. China takes the slow path because
they have little other choice.

That revolution was a direct result of European conquest. Religious
and philosophical values changed in China prior to the renaissance
causing a retardation in science and technology just as Europe was
beginning to burgeon with scientific discovery and application. The
aftermath of Europe's attempts to colonize in Asia resulted in
instability that lasted for decades. While there were wars as
continually as Europe saw during the same period, Chinese government
only collapsed well into the twentieth century.

Having 1.3 billion people when 1 billion are non productive is not a
pay window. In 2005 the Chinese GDP grew 9.9% this means that the
average Chinese citizen increased his wealth by around $600 dollars.
In the United states with a growth rate of 3.5% the average American
increased his wealth by around $1,400.

Again you ignore the fact that China is changing. Growth is enormous
and rapid. The yuan sucks up every increase in value Beijing will
allow. You can deride China as a backwards nation if you like but it
boasts more cities over a million than any other region in the world.
The largest shopping malls and condo complexes are there and getting
bigger. And how backward, poor and non productive can they be when
they're loaning hundreds of billions to the US and every day brings
more complaints and revelations about the influence China has in the
US economy. You pointed out China's value to Wal Mart, this country's
largest retailer and employer.

Other countries with high economic growth rates would include India at
7.6%, Afghanistan at 8% and Venezuela at 9.3%. Do you project any of
these countries becoming dominate world economies?

They're too small except for India which is giving China a run for
it's money. Even so, it's still Asia and India and China share
border. Asia is rapidly becoming powerful and China will be it's
leading nation.

Our job isn't to prevent or supercede Chinese global supremacy, but to
secure our place in the new world order that 2099 will bring and
assure we don't drown in China's propwash.

LOL!

<g> Laugh now but learn Mandarin.

"We will bury you!" -- Nikita Khrushchev Chairman of the former USSR.

China makes no such threats. China isn't wasting it's resources on
guns and bombs and fomenting international conflict.
Swill
.
User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 27 Oct 2006 10:37:56 AM
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:42:21 -0400,
wrote:

On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:25:17 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

What does China supply that can't be provided from other places?


Equity loans on a nine figure scale.

Equity eh? Do you see China foreclosing any time soon on Wal*Mart?


Do you see Wal Mart voluntarily raising it's costs and prices in order
to gain the good will of consumers irrationally threatened by China?

The US was once a third order nation. A barely united conglomerate
immigrant colonists speaking a dozen languages and all scrapping for
their bit of an as yet unbaked pie.

Yet in less than 200 years the US leads the world.


China will do it much sooner.

In the 4,000 years
of China's history the only time that they were a world power is when
they were run by a foreign power. The Mongols.


Sophisticated urban civilization in China predates the Greeks and can
be traced back as far as Egypt's middle kingdom. Until the
Renaissance China was also a leader in technological development.
Chinese medicine was more highly developed than anything Europe knew
before the 18th century. Their astronomical observations exceed in
detail the state of the art in western culture until the renaissance.

The last revolution in the US was the Civil War 145 years ago. The
first half of the 20th century was nothing but revolution in China.
The Communist (Mao) dynasty is one of a string of governments
stretching back into dim history. China takes the slow path because
they have little other choice.


That revolution was a direct result of European conquest. Religious
and philosophical values changed in China prior to the renaissance
causing a retardation in science and technology just as Europe was
beginning to burgeon with scientific discovery and application. The
aftermath of Europe's attempts to colonize in Asia resulted in
instability that lasted for decades. While there were wars as
continually as Europe saw during the same period, Chinese government
only collapsed well into the twentieth century.

Having 1.3 billion people when 1 billion are non productive is not a
pay window. In 2005 the Chinese GDP grew 9.9% this means that the
average Chinese citizen increased his wealth by around $600 dollars.
In the United states with a growth rate of 3.5% the average American
increased his wealth by around $1,400.


Again you ignore the fact that China is changing. Growth is enormous
and rapid. The yuan sucks up every increase in value Beijing will
allow. You can deride China as a backwards nation if you like but it
boasts more cities over a million than any other region in the world.
The largest shopping malls and condo complexes are there and getting
bigger. And how backward, poor and non productive can they be when
they're loaning hundreds of billions to the US and every day brings
more complaints and revelations about the influence China has in the
US economy. You pointed out China's value to Wal Mart, this country's
largest retailer and employer.

Other countries with high economic growth rates would include India at
7.6%, Afghanistan at 8% and Venezuela at 9.3%. Do you project any of
these countries becoming dominate world economies?


They're too small except for India which is giving China a run for
it's money. Even so, it's still Asia and India and China share
border. Asia is rapidly becoming powerful and China will be it's
leading nation.

Our job isn't to prevent or supercede Chinese global supremacy, but to
secure our place in the new world order that 2099 will bring and
assure we don't drown in China's propwash.

LOL!


<g> Laugh now but learn Mandarin.

"We will bury you!" -- Nikita Khrushchev Chairman of the former USSR.


China makes no such threats. China isn't wasting it's resources on
guns and bombs and fomenting international conflict.

You are kidding right? Military expenditures as a percent of GDP is
higher in China than in the US. 4.3% verses 4.06%.
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html
The economic growth of China touches only a small % of the Chinese
population. Things are good in the largest cities and enterprise zones
yet half the Chinese live much as they have for the last 1,000 years.
A large minority don't even know who the current "emperor" is.
--
Wherever I go it will be well with me, for it was well with me here, not
on account of the place, but of my judgments which I shall carry away
with me, for no one can deprive me of these; on the contrary, they alone
are my property, and cannot be taken away, and to possess them suffices
me wherever I am or whatever I do. -- EPICTETUS
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
User: ""

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 28 Oct 2006 12:55:38 AM
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:37:56 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

You are kidding right? Military expenditures as a percent of GDP is
higher in China than in the US. 4.3% verses 4.06%.
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html

Weren't you the one going on about how insignificant China's economy
is? Didn't you notice that per your own source above, the US spends
more than six times what China does on defense? Being the most
populous nation on earth, I'd expect the Chinese to be armed with more
than three spitball shooters and a baseball bat.

The economic growth of China touches only a small % of the Chinese
population. Things are good in the largest cities and enterprise zones
yet half the Chinese live much as they have for the last 1,000 years.
A large minority don't even know who the current "emperor" is.

Even the poorest backwaters know the Party is in charge. And half the
population has no electricity? No plumbing? No antibiotics?
In any case I'm referring to China's future, not it's past or present.
There are other advantages China will enjoy. It's manufacturing base
could become more modern than ours in part because they are starting
to build it now. We would need heavy investment in infrastructure and
at least strategic manufacturing capability to keep up. They have
three times the human resources we do. That means on average, three
times the mathematicians physicists and engineers. You don't
seriously believe that Asians are somehow less intelligent or less
capable of achieving goals than Americans?
I suspect China has advanced more than you think and perhaps less than
I think but I will stand by my opinion. The 21st century will be
China's. If we don't all die off in the meantime.
Swill
.
User: "Hugh Gibbons"

Title: Re: The World We Know Is Ending 29 Oct 2006 12:54:46 AM
In article <qgq5k2dgvsiqfnn4n51rv88lr47dh1kakk@4ax.com>,
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:37:56 -0700, Captain Compassion
<daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote:

You are kidding right? Military expenditures as a percent of GDP is
higher in China than in the US. 4.3% verses 4.06%.
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ch.html


Weren't you the one going on about how insignificant China's economy
is? Didn't you notice that per your own source above, the US spends
more than six times what China does on defense? Being the most
populous nation on earth, I'd expect the Chinese to be armed with more
than three spitball shooters and a baseball bat.

Since money goes 3 times as far in China than in the USA, does this
imply that China's military spending buys about half the capability
that the US is buying?
.

User: "Captain Compassion"

Title: Re: The World We K