"Genaro" <genaro@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9839BC74A367Bgenaro@216.196.97.142...

"Genaro" <genaro@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9838E2C0F272Dgenaro@216.196.97.142...

ViperSpit wrote:

#1 - the fact that the former Woody administration is screaming
about ABC's mini series is going to bring out
the truth seekers in finding out just what happened during this
mentally incompotent, mentally ill administration (with regards
to terrorism and Bin Laden), on who knew what, who said what,
and who did nothing.

#2 - it shows the American public just how Democrats feel about
"feedom of press". Freedom of Press to Pinkos, means
the press airs only what Pinkos want aired.

Word on the street is that there are high Pinko government
officials "threatening" ABC if they air this mini series
without first editing out the ***** ups.

Stay tuned folks, because I sense a Pandora's Box being pryed
open.

heh heh
Spit

Spit you are such a jackass. What word on the street would anyone
have with
a moron like you? All the garbage you puke up fits your heroes,
not anyone with half a brain and some common sence like the next
guy in charge.

#1-the truth seekers in finding out just what happened during this

mentally incompetent, mentally ill administration (with regards
to terrorism and Bin Laden), on who knew what, who said what,
and who did nothing.

This explains you republicans exactly. Clinton may have been
slicker then
***** but to use words like 'mental ill administration' is exactly
who is running this country now.

Bush was warned about OBL, this is common knowledge. Bush said he
does not
care.

Clinton asked to peruse OBL but was turned down and accused of
'wagging the
dog'.

The best thing about this movie hype is that NOW even more than
ever will
the corrupt and deceitful Bush administration will get more air
time and press about the scale of the lies.

This movie is going to backfire bigtime.

-----------
ViperSpit, although agressive is his/her expression, (sorry Spit, I
don't know you), makes two very good points which you neglected to
address.

Point #1 - Clinton and the people he surrounded himself with could
have remained silent and let this mini-series pass in much the same
way Farenheit 9/11 did. They instead opted to make a stink and call
the attention of the world down upon it reopening the many
questions about "who knew what, who said what, and who did
nothing."

Point #2 - The intimidation and blackmail of ABC by the Democrat
party to pull or at least severely edit the mini-series entitled
"The Path to 9/11" scheduled to air this Sunday and Monday evenings
can easily be construed as an attack on Freedom of the Press. From
what I heard today, democrats are threatening ABC's broadcasting
license unless the mini- series is pulled or edited in a way that
exonerates the Clinton administration prior to 9/11. When the
government uses its power to control the media we become no better
than Stalinists and cease to be the beacon of freedom in the world.
Is that the price you're willing to pay to regain power?
-------------

Point #1: Mr. Moore's film is the best box office ever for a
documentary. Sorry, its true. You on the right won't acknowledge it
but its true.

Point #2: Of all the people you should be disgusted with a
"documentary" that lies. You on the far right talk endlessly about
your religion and what it requires. Doesn't your religion require
truth? Isn't it your duty to say "You lied" to a liar?

The people who made this program lied. You know it, I know it and
all of America knows it.

----------
Well then, won't everybody write it off as a pack of lies like they
did with Farenheit 9/11? And why shouldn't it be our decision whether
it is factual or not?
----------

"Everybody" didn't write of Farenheit 911 as a pack of lies. That
didn't happen and you know it.

So what you are saying is that there is no objective truth. The truth
is what you decide. So if you decide there was no Holocaust, well,
just write it off.

See, here's your problem. This program lies about 9/11, thats wrong.
You and yours protested against "Reagan" and won. Now you are
supporting a program that lies. See the problem?

Genaro wrote:

"Genaro" <genaro@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9838E2C0F272Dgenaro@216.196.97.142...

ViperSpit wrote:

#1 - the fact that the former Woody administration is screaming
about ABC's mini series is going to bring out
the truth seekers in finding out just what happened during this
mentally incompotent, mentally ill administration (with regards
to terrorism and Bin Laden), on who knew what, who said what,
and who did nothing.

#2 - it shows the American public just how Democrats feel about
"feedom of press". Freedom of Press to Pinkos, means
the press airs only what Pinkos want aired.

Word on the street is that there are high Pinko government
officials "threatening" ABC if they air this mini series
without first editing out the ***** ups.

Stay tuned folks, because I sense a Pandora's Box being pryed
open.

heh heh
Spit

Spit you are such a jackass. What word on the street would anyone
have with
a moron like you? All the garbage you puke up fits your heroes,
not anyone with half a brain and some common sence like the next
guy in charge.

#1-the truth seekers in finding out just what happened during this

mentally incompetent, mentally ill administration (with regards
to terrorism and Bin Laden), on who knew what, who said what,
and who did nothing.

This explains you republicans exactly. Clinton may have been
slicker then
***** but to use words like 'mental ill administration' is exactly
who is running this country now.

Bush was warned about OBL, this is common knowledge. Bush said he
does not
care.

Clinton asked to peruse OBL but was turned down and accused of
'wagging the
dog'.

The best thing about this movie hype is that NOW even more than
ever will
the corrupt and deceitful Bush administration will get more air
time and press about the scale of the lies.

This movie is going to backfire bigtime.

-----------
ViperSpit, although agressive is his/her expression, (sorry Spit, I
don't know you), makes two very good points which you neglected to
address.

Point #1 - Clinton and the people he surrounded himself with could
have remained silent and let this mini-series pass in much the same
way Farenheit 9/11 did. They instead opted to make a stink and call
the attention of the world down upon it reopening the many
questions about "who knew what, who said what, and who did
nothing."

Point #2 - The intimidation and blackmail of ABC by the Democrat
party to pull or at least severely edit the mini-series entitled
"The Path to 9/11" scheduled to air this Sunday and Monday evenings
can easily be construed as an attack on Freedom of the Press. From
what I heard today, democrats are threatening ABC's broadcasting
license unless the mini- series is pulled or edited in a way that
exonerates the Clinton administration prior to 9/11. When the
government uses its power to control the media we become no better
than Stalinists and cease to be the beacon of freedom in the world.
Is that the price you're willing to pay to regain power?
-------------

Point #1: Mr. Moore's film is the best box office ever for a
documentary. Sorry, its true. You on the right won't acknowledge it
but its true.

Point #2: Of all the people you should be disgusted with a
"documentary" that lies. You on the far right talk endlessly about
your religion and what it requires. Doesn't your religion require
truth? Isn't it your duty to say "You lied" to a liar?

The people who made this program lied. You know it, I know it and
all of America knows it.

----------
Well then, won't everybody write it off as a pack of lies like they
did with Farenheit 9/11? And why shouldn't it be our decision whether
it is factual or not?
----------

Because it is also meant to be played and portrayed as fact in high
schools
for debate. Would all people accept nothing but the truth if it were
about Hitler or any of Bush's new analogies?

On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 17:33:32 -0500, Genaro <genaro@cablespeed.com>
wrote:

Point #1: Mr. Moore's film is the best box office ever for a
documentary. Sorry, its true. You on the right won't acknowledge it
but its true.

Point #2: Of all the people you should be disgusted with a
"documentary" that lies. You on the far right talk endlessly about
your religion and what it requires. Doesn't your religion require
truth? Isn't it your duty to say "You lied" to a liar?

The people who made this program lied. You know it, I know it and

of America knows it.

----------
Well then, won't everybody write it off as a pack of lies like they did
with Farenheit 9/11? And why shouldn't it be our decision whether it is
factual or not?
----------

Why do you compare Fah 9/11 and the Road to 9/11? One's a movie and
one's a TV show. The standards are vastly different for each medium.
Moore made a movie with the sole purpose of showing what a jackass
Bush is. The ABC drama is supposed to be historically accurate - it
isn't. It's called the ABC history project. It, in fact, began as a
fundie Xtian history project (source - MSNBC). If ABC wishes to
televise it as a historically inaccurate drama which seeks to
discredit the Clinton administration then it should say so and remove
the 'history' tag. If ABC wishes to televise the drama in its present
form then the lawyers will be busy for the foreseeable future as each
"character" who is misquoted sues for defamation etc;

WB Yeats

Why do you compare Fah 9/11 and the Road to 9/11? One's a movie and
one's a TV show. The standards are vastly different for each medium.