JEWISH CULTURAL AIDS: No Free Speech for Historians and Scientists
Revisionist David Irving: Thought Criminal
by Charles Coughlin
David Irving continues to suffer imprisonment in Austria because he
dared to defend the honor of the German people by speaking the truth.
A CBC news article reports "Austrian prosecutors want British
historian David Irving to spend more time in prison, saying his
three-year sentence for denying the Holocaust is too lenient. Irving
could have been sentenced to 10 years in prison after pleading guilty
on Monday to charges of denying the Holocaust. Under Austrian law, it
is a crime to publicly diminish, deny or justify the Holocaust.
Irving, who has written close to 30 books, was arrested in November
1989 after he denied in speeches in Austria that the Nazis killed six
million Jews. He had contended most of the Jews who died during the
war succumbed to diseases such as typhus. Austria's Justice Ministry
says there were 158 convictions between 1999 and 2004..."
Mr. Irving has pursued historical truth all his life. He was written a
series of best-selling books about World War Two. Despite his
long-standing record as a great historical writer, he has been treated
as a common criminal because he chose to examine the Holocaust. Mr.
Irving poses no threat to anyone and locking him up is an outrageous
act of political oppression. Considering that Mr. Irving is 68 years
old, a jail sentence could easily prove fatal. The Austrian
authorities could have deported him to England, but it seems some
hidden hand wanted a more severe punishment. So this idealistic old
man was sent to prison to appease hateful elements who want to
suppress historical truth.
Irving joins a growing list of thought criminals who have been
imprisoned for questioning the Holocaust. Germar Rudolph, who
graduated from the Max Planck Institute with a degree in chemistry,
tested bricks in the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz only to find
that there was no trace of poison gas. Because he published his
findings, which undermined the Holocaust, the government of Germany
declared him a criminal. Rudolph tried to apply for political asylum
in the US, but Zionist pressure prevented this legitimate victim of
persecution from getting sanctuary. Another Revisionist, Ernst Zundel,
who had published literature that questioned the Holocaust, was being
hounded by the Canadian government. Zundel married an American woman
and was in the process of becoming a US citizen when Zionists applied
pressure and got him deported to Germany to be sent to prison for
exercising his free speech.
The government of Austria has decided that the "feelings" of Jewish
citizens are so important that any questioning of the Holocaust, which
might suggest millions of Jews were not murdered by Germans during
World War Two should be outlawed. This raises the question: Why do
Jews want to believe that they were mass-murdered? If there is strong
historical evidence, which has been suppressed for decades, that
suggests there was no organized effort to mass murder Jews, why would
the Jews so stubbornly refuse to consider it? In modern society, there
is a certain "holiness" that derives from victimhood. By claiming that
they are the biggest victims of all time, the Jews bestow upon
themselves an immunity from criticism.
While Jews are protected from criticism by law in some nations,
homosexual "artists" can photograph a crucifix in a tub of urine,
calling that "art." The feelings of Christians are not considered
"important" enough to be protected by law. Why is it OK to accuse
Germans of mass murdering civilians without allowing anyone to defend
the honor of the German people? The Nuremberg "Trial" was nothing more
than a show trial. Defendants were tortured into signing confessions.
Joseph Stalin used the same judge at Nuremberg, who ordered the
executions of countless officials, whom Stalin distrusted, during the
purge trials of the 1930s. The Germans had never been properly
defended against these charges of mass murder until historians like
David Irving came forward to speak the truth.
Prior to the Holocaust, many Western politicians were allowed to talk
freely about the Jews. Many American politicians wanted to strictly
limit the immigration of Jews into America. They considered the Jews
an alien race prone to usury, dishonest business practices, insider
trading and corrupting the political process. (Side note: Orthodox
Jew, Jack Abramoff, has recently been found guilty in possibly the
most widespread political bribery scandal in history and our Congress
has been described as under the thumb of the Israeli Lobby.)
The Holocaust provides blanket protection against criticism for Jews
and the nation of Israel. Anyone who points out the dishonest neocon
Zionist cabal surrounding Bush, who lied us into war, is quickly
called a "Nazi" with the implication that he wants to push Jews into
gas chambers. Meanwhile Zionist liars have murdered innocent people
using the US military. Most recently, the nation of Israel has waged a
war of aggression against Lebanon and Gaza. American politicians have
proven themselves shamefully spineless in the face of this wanton
aggression. Once again, the truth cannot be spoken because of the
Holocaust. It is not just an historical inaccuracy; it is a license to
kill for Zionists. This is why there is such fanatic resistance to any
critical examination of the Holocaust.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.RealNews247.com
.
|
