Politics > Politics-USA > U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"explorerthedog" |
| Date: |
02 Sep 2006 09:31:47 PM |
| Object: |
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
By Rev. Bill McGinnis, Director - LoveAllPeople.org
September 2, 2006
HTML page at http://loveallpeople.org/usforcescanneverdefeat.html
In his latest revised collection of talking points, President Bush
said, "We will not allow the terrorists to dictate the future of this
century -- so we will defeat them in Iraq."
- Source:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/08/20060831-1.html
But in this very same speech, he declares: "The war we fight today is
more than a military conflict; it is the decisive ideological struggle
of the 21st century. (Applause.) On one side are those who believe in
the values of freedom and moderation -- the right of all people to
speak, and worship, and live in liberty. And on the other side are
those driven by the values of tyranny and extremism -- the right of a
self-appointed few to impose their fanatical views on all the rest."
So then we have two things going on at the same time, according to
Bush: a military conflict whose focus is now in Iraq, and the decisive
ideological struggle of the 21st century.
That's a very sad situation for us, under the bumbling delusional
leadership of Bush and the Neo-Conservatives, because: 1) U. S. forces
can never win the military conflict in Iraq; and 2) Bush doesn't have a
clue about how to win the ideological conflict. In fact, he doesn't
even understand the ideological conflict. It is far more complicated
than his simple-minded cartoon picture of a struggle between "freedom"
and "tyranny." Even worse, Bush seems to think that if we kill all the
terrorists in the military conflict, we will have won the ideological
conflict. This ignores the obvious reality that our attempts to kill
all the terrorists are in fact also killing and wounding thousands of
innocent non-terrorists, and pushing untold millions of peaceful
Muslims around the world into a desperate, wild-eyed hatred of the
United States.
So where do we start? How do we begin to get ourselves out of this
self-inflicted disaster in Iraq? For me, the best place to start is to
recognize that U. S. forces can never defeat "the terrorists" in Iraq.
This is not defeatism, as the Bush people think; it is reality, which
they do not understand. And since we can never defeat the terrorists in
Iraq, we should pull out immediately, the sooner the better. The longer
we stay in Iraq, the worse things will be for us and for the Iraqis,
because our continued presence continues to create new terrorist
recruits throughout the Muslim world.
But why not? Why can't we defeat the terrorists in Iraq? Don't we have
the most wonderful military in the world? With the most expensive,
sexiest, high-tech equipment? And the finest medical care, which can
prolong the life of destroyed bodies for years and years? And the
bravest, strongest, best men and women fighters? And the most beautiful
flag, displayed backwards on the right sleeve of our redesigned,
functional-yet-beautiful uniforms? Why can't we defeat the terrorists
in Iraq?
Because they have an infinite supply of replacements, and we do not:
that is the basic reason. And the longer we remain in Iraq as an
occupying army, the more recruits they will gain, from the millions of
newly-enraged Muslims around the world.
Let's do the math. There are something like 1.6 billion Muslims in the
world. (Source: http://www.islamicpopulation.com/ ) Let's suppose half
of them are of fighting age, and half of those are men. That gives 400
million Muslim men of fighting age, world-wide. Now suppose only one
percent of them are highly motivated, willing and able to fight against
us in Iraq. That is a manpower pool of four million potential terrorist
recruits for Iraq. If there are between five thousand and ten thousand
hard-core terrorists in Iraq at any time (nobody really knows), then
four million potential recruits are more than enough to keep them
well-supplied forever, given normal birth rates. Meanwhile, we are
reaching the bottom of the barrel of potential recruits in the USA, and
having to pay out huge bonuses to disadvantaged people to induce them
to volunteer.
Therefore, we cannot possibly win the military conflict in Iraq. We
never will be able to "defeat the terrorists in Iraq," because they
have an infinite supply of replacements, and we do not. (This is
essentially the same problem we had in Viet Nam.) So President Bush's
belief that we can defeat them is delusional nonsense.
Blessings to you. May God help us all.
# # #
http://www.LoveAllPeople.org
.
|
|
| User: "Joe S." |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
02 Sep 2006 09:53:58 PM |
|
|
"explorerthedog" <exp1943@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157250707.838649.135900@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
By Rev. Bill McGinnis, Director - LoveAllPeople.org
September 2, 2006
HTML page at http://loveallpeople.org/usforcescanneverdefeat.html
In his latest revised collection of talking points, President Bush
said, "We will not allow the terrorists to dictate the future of this
century -- so we will defeat them in Iraq."
- Source:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/08/20060831-1.html
But in this very same speech, he declares: "The war we fight today is
more than a military conflict; it is the decisive ideological struggle
of the 21st century. (Applause.) On one side are those who believe in
the values of freedom and moderation -- the right of all people to
speak, and worship, and live in liberty. And on the other side are
those driven by the values of tyranny and extremism -- the right of a
self-appointed few to impose their fanatical views on all the rest."
So then we have two things going on at the same time, according to
Bush: a military conflict whose focus is now in Iraq, and the decisive
ideological struggle of the 21st century.
That's a very sad situation for us, under the bumbling delusional
leadership of Bush and the Neo-Conservatives, because: 1) U. S. forces
can never win the military conflict in Iraq; and 2) Bush doesn't have a
clue about how to win the ideological conflict. In fact, he doesn't
even understand the ideological conflict. It is far more complicated
than his simple-minded cartoon picture of a struggle between "freedom"
and "tyranny." Even worse, Bush seems to think that if we kill all the
terrorists in the military conflict, we will have won the ideological
conflict. This ignores the obvious reality that our attempts to kill
all the terrorists are in fact also killing and wounding thousands of
innocent non-terrorists, and pushing untold millions of peaceful
Muslims around the world into a desperate, wild-eyed hatred of the
United States.
So where do we start? How do we begin to get ourselves out of this
self-inflicted disaster in Iraq? For me, the best place to start is to
recognize that U. S. forces can never defeat "the terrorists" in Iraq.
This is not defeatism, as the Bush people think; it is reality, which
they do not understand. And since we can never defeat the terrorists in
Iraq, we should pull out immediately, the sooner the better. The longer
we stay in Iraq, the worse things will be for us and for the Iraqis,
because our continued presence continues to create new terrorist
recruits throughout the Muslim world.
But why not? Why can't we defeat the terrorists in Iraq? Don't we have
the most wonderful military in the world? With the most expensive,
sexiest, high-tech equipment? And the finest medical care, which can
prolong the life of destroyed bodies for years and years? And the
bravest, strongest, best men and women fighters? And the most beautiful
flag, displayed backwards on the right sleeve of our redesigned,
functional-yet-beautiful uniforms? Why can't we defeat the terrorists
in Iraq?
Because they have an infinite supply of replacements, and we do not:
that is the basic reason. And the longer we remain in Iraq as an
occupying army, the more recruits they will gain, from the millions of
newly-enraged Muslims around the world.
Let's do the math. There are something like 1.6 billion Muslims in the
world. (Source: http://www.islamicpopulation.com/ ) Let's suppose half
of them are of fighting age, and half of those are men. That gives 400
million Muslim men of fighting age, world-wide. Now suppose only one
percent of them are highly motivated, willing and able to fight against
us in Iraq. That is a manpower pool of four million potential terrorist
recruits for Iraq. If there are between five thousand and ten thousand
hard-core terrorists in Iraq at any time (nobody really knows), then
four million potential recruits are more than enough to keep them
well-supplied forever, given normal birth rates. Meanwhile, we are
reaching the bottom of the barrel of potential recruits in the USA, and
having to pay out huge bonuses to disadvantaged people to induce them
to volunteer.
Therefore, we cannot possibly win the military conflict in Iraq. We
never will be able to "defeat the terrorists in Iraq," because they
have an infinite supply of replacements, and we do not. (This is
essentially the same problem we had in Viet Nam.) So President Bush's
belief that we can defeat them is delusional nonsense.
Blessings to you. May God help us all.
# # #
http://www.LoveAllPeople.org
Dear Rev. Bill:
I am confused. I mean, I am confused all to hell.
You tell us that the USofA cannot defeat the terrorists in Iraq because they
have an unending supply of replacements.
BUT
***** Cheney -- whom I trust and whose every word I believe -- tells us the
insurgency in Iraq is "in its last throes."
Because ***** Cheney would never lie to me, I must conclude that you are some
kind of a nut.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Al Smith" |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - becausethey have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
03 Sep 2006 02:31:13 PM |
|
|
Because ***** Cheney would never lie to me, I must conclude that you are some
kind of a nut.
Just watch out that he doesn't shoot you in the face.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Thomas Lee Elifritz" |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - becausethey have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
02 Sep 2006 10:17:23 PM |
|
|
Joe S. wrote:
"explorerthedog" <exp1943@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1157250707.838649.135900@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
By Rev. Bill McGinnis, Director - LoveAllPeople.org
September 2, 2006
HTML page at http://loveallpeople.org/usforcescanneverdefeat.html
In his latest revised collection of talking points, President Bush
said, "We will not allow the terrorists to dictate the future of this
century -- so we will defeat them in Iraq."
- Source:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/08/20060831-1.html
But in this very same speech, he declares: "The war we fight today is
more than a military conflict; it is the decisive ideological struggle
of the 21st century. (Applause.) On one side are those who believe in
the values of freedom and moderation -- the right of all people to
speak, and worship, and live in liberty. And on the other side are
those driven by the values of tyranny and extremism -- the right of a
self-appointed few to impose their fanatical views on all the rest."
So then we have two things going on at the same time, according to
Bush: a military conflict whose focus is now in Iraq, and the decisive
ideological struggle of the 21st century.
That's a very sad situation for us, under the bumbling delusional
leadership of Bush and the Neo-Conservatives, because: 1) U. S. forces
can never win the military conflict in Iraq; and 2) Bush doesn't have a
clue about how to win the ideological conflict. In fact, he doesn't
even understand the ideological conflict. It is far more complicated
than his simple-minded cartoon picture of a struggle between "freedom"
and "tyranny." Even worse, Bush seems to think that if we kill all the
terrorists in the military conflict, we will have won the ideological
conflict. This ignores the obvious reality that our attempts to kill
all the terrorists are in fact also killing and wounding thousands of
innocent non-terrorists, and pushing untold millions of peaceful
Muslims around the world into a desperate, wild-eyed hatred of the
United States.
So where do we start? How do we begin to get ourselves out of this
self-inflicted disaster in Iraq? For me, the best place to start is to
recognize that U. S. forces can never defeat "the terrorists" in Iraq.
This is not defeatism, as the Bush people think; it is reality, which
they do not understand. And since we can never defeat the terrorists in
Iraq, we should pull out immediately, the sooner the better. The longer
we stay in Iraq, the worse things will be for us and for the Iraqis,
because our continued presence continues to create new terrorist
recruits throughout the Muslim world.
But why not? Why can't we defeat the terrorists in Iraq? Don't we have
the most wonderful military in the world? With the most expensive,
sexiest, high-tech equipment? And the finest medical care, which can
prolong the life of destroyed bodies for years and years? And the
bravest, strongest, best men and women fighters? And the most beautiful
flag, displayed backwards on the right sleeve of our redesigned,
functional-yet-beautiful uniforms? Why can't we defeat the terrorists
in Iraq?
Because they have an infinite supply of replacements, and we do not:
that is the basic reason. And the longer we remain in Iraq as an
occupying army, the more recruits they will gain, from the millions of
newly-enraged Muslims around the world.
Let's do the math. There are something like 1.6 billion Muslims in the
world. (Source: http://www.islamicpopulation.com/ ) Let's suppose half
of them are of fighting age, and half of those are men. That gives 400
million Muslim men of fighting age, world-wide. Now suppose only one
percent of them are highly motivated, willing and able to fight against
us in Iraq. That is a manpower pool of four million potential terrorist
recruits for Iraq. If there are between five thousand and ten thousand
hard-core terrorists in Iraq at any time (nobody really knows), then
four million potential recruits are more than enough to keep them
well-supplied forever, given normal birth rates. Meanwhile, we are
reaching the bottom of the barrel of potential recruits in the USA, and
having to pay out huge bonuses to disadvantaged people to induce them
to volunteer.
Therefore, we cannot possibly win the military conflict in Iraq. We
never will be able to "defeat the terrorists in Iraq," because they
have an infinite supply of replacements, and we do not. (This is
essentially the same problem we had in Viet Nam.) So President Bush's
belief that we can defeat them is delusional nonsense.
Blessings to you. May God help us all.
# # #
http://www.LoveAllPeople.org
Dear Rev. Bill:
I am confused. I mean, I am confused all to hell.
You tell us that the USofA cannot defeat the terrorists in Iraq because they
have an unending supply of replacements.
We'll have to start hiring Mexicans to fight our wars for us.
BUT
***** Cheney -- whom I trust and whose every word I believe -- tells us the
insurgency in Iraq is "in its last throes."
Because ***** Cheney would never lie to me, I must conclude that you are some
kind of a nut.
I feel a song coming on ...
http://cosmic.lifeform.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Captain Compassion" |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
03 Sep 2006 02:15:22 AM |
|
|
On 2 Sep 2006 19:31:47 -0700, "explorerthedog" <exp1943@yahoo.com>
wrote:
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
Infinite eh? Well we can always use Mexicans.
By Rev. Bill McGinnis, Director - LoveAllPeople.org
September 2, 2006
HTML page at http://loveallpeople.org/usforcescanneverdefeat.html
In his latest revised collection of talking points, President Bush
said, "We will not allow the terrorists to dictate the future of this
century -- so we will defeat them in Iraq."
- Source:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/08/20060831-1.html
But in this very same speech, he declares: "The war we fight today is
more than a military conflict; it is the decisive ideological struggle
of the 21st century. (Applause.) On one side are those who believe in
the values of freedom and moderation -- the right of all people to
speak, and worship, and live in liberty. And on the other side are
those driven by the values of tyranny and extremism -- the right of a
self-appointed few to impose their fanatical views on all the rest."
So then we have two things going on at the same time, according to
Bush: a military conflict whose focus is now in Iraq, and the decisive
ideological struggle of the 21st century.
That's a very sad situation for us, under the bumbling delusional
leadership of Bush and the Neo-Conservatives, because: 1) U. S. forces
can never win the military conflict in Iraq; and 2) Bush doesn't have a
clue about how to win the ideological conflict. In fact, he doesn't
even understand the ideological conflict. It is far more complicated
than his simple-minded cartoon picture of a struggle between "freedom"
and "tyranny." Even worse, Bush seems to think that if we kill all the
terrorists in the military conflict, we will have won the ideological
conflict. This ignores the obvious reality that our attempts to kill
all the terrorists are in fact also killing and wounding thousands of
innocent non-terrorists, and pushing untold millions of peaceful
Muslims around the world into a desperate, wild-eyed hatred of the
United States.
So where do we start? How do we begin to get ourselves out of this
self-inflicted disaster in Iraq? For me, the best place to start is to
recognize that U. S. forces can never defeat "the terrorists" in Iraq.
This is not defeatism, as the Bush people think; it is reality, which
they do not understand. And since we can never defeat the terrorists in
Iraq, we should pull out immediately, the sooner the better. The longer
we stay in Iraq, the worse things will be for us and for the Iraqis,
because our continued presence continues to create new terrorist
recruits throughout the Muslim world.
But why not? Why can't we defeat the terrorists in Iraq? Don't we have
the most wonderful military in the world? With the most expensive,
sexiest, high-tech equipment? And the finest medical care, which can
prolong the life of destroyed bodies for years and years? And the
bravest, strongest, best men and women fighters? And the most beautiful
flag, displayed backwards on the right sleeve of our redesigned,
functional-yet-beautiful uniforms? Why can't we defeat the terrorists
in Iraq?
Because they have an infinite supply of replacements, and we do not:
that is the basic reason. And the longer we remain in Iraq as an
occupying army, the more recruits they will gain, from the millions of
newly-enraged Muslims around the world.
Let's do the math. There are something like 1.6 billion Muslims in the
world. (Source: http://www.islamicpopulation.com/ ) Let's suppose half
of them are of fighting age, and half of those are men. That gives 400
million Muslim men of fighting age, world-wide. Now suppose only one
percent of them are highly motivated, willing and able to fight against
us in Iraq. That is a manpower pool of four million potential terrorist
recruits for Iraq. If there are between five thousand and ten thousand
hard-core terrorists in Iraq at any time (nobody really knows), then
four million potential recruits are more than enough to keep them
well-supplied forever, given normal birth rates. Meanwhile, we are
reaching the bottom of the barrel of potential recruits in the USA, and
having to pay out huge bonuses to disadvantaged people to induce them
to volunteer.
Therefore, we cannot possibly win the military conflict in Iraq. We
never will be able to "defeat the terrorists in Iraq," because they
have an infinite supply of replacements, and we do not. (This is
essentially the same problem we had in Viet Nam.) So President Bush's
belief that we can defeat them is delusional nonsense.
Blessings to you. May God help us all.
# # #
http://www.LoveAllPeople.org
--
"Science is the record of dead religions." -- Oscar Wilde
"There are no absolute certainties in this universe. A man must try to
whip order into a yelping pack of probabilities, and uniform success is
impossible." -- Jack Vance
"Civilization is the interval between Ice Ages." -- Will Durant.
"War is God's way of teaching Americans geography" -- Ambrose Bierce
"Progress is the increasing control of the environment by life.
--Will Durant
Joseph R. Darancette
daranc@NOSPAMverizon.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "snakehawk" |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
03 Sep 2006 06:57:37 AM |
|
|
Captain Compassion wrote:
On 2 Sep 2006 19:31:47 -0700, "explorerthedog" <exp1943@yahoo.com>
wrote:
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
Infinite eh? Well we can always use Mexicans.
You may have stumbled upon the solution: send fighters from a specific
ethnic group. Think about it: the enemy is a specific ethnic and
religious crowd. They are emotionally involved and fanatical in their
fight. The United States should select troops from an ethnic and
religious group that is equally emotional and fanitical in their
opposition to the enemy. A specific ethnic and religious group whose
members are relentlessly demanding war with the Muslims, relentlessly
calling for the death of Muslims, relentlessly expressing hatred for
the Muslims. The solution: send the Jews of the United States to fight
in the Middle East.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "PerfectlyAble" |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
03 Sep 2006 02:27:30 AM |
|
|
Captain Compassion wrote:
On 2 Sep 2006 19:31:47 -0700, "explorerthedog" <exp1943@yahoo.com>
wrote:
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
Infinite eh? Well we can always use Mexicans.
Another example of Bush failer to galvanise the world in
the cause of war against terrorism.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Michael Ejercito" |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
03 Sep 2006 10:30:20 AM |
|
|
explorerthedog wrote:
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
Then the obvious solution is to exterminate the populations from
which enemies recruit from.
Michael
.
|
|
|
| User: "snakehawk" |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
03 Sep 2006 12:20:39 PM |
|
|
Michael Ejercito wrote:
explorerthedog wrote:
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
Then the obvious solution is to exterminate the populations from
which enemies recruit from.
Michael
Much easier: let's exterminate the object of their hatred. Just do the
math. There are billion of Muslims, but only 14 or 15 million Jews in
the whole world. The United States, Europe and Russia could export
all the Jews to Israel and nuke the place. Or, even more economical
for the West, Just let the Muslims have their fun.
The savings would be enormous. The price of oil would plummet. The
United States alone would immediately save $10 billion every year.
Germany could finally stop paying billions in reparations for some
mythical "Holocaust." The international dope trade would be reduced to
something manageable. International prostitution rings would
practically disappear. Those multibillion-dollar wars in the Middle
Ease could end. World travel would be cheaper and safer. The
Christians could start preaching Christianity again instead of the
present corrupt form of Judaism. And people could read about other
things in their media besides warmongering propaganda, how to hate
Muslims, and why the West should attack Islam.
That would be the best solution. We ought to put it to a vote.
.
|
|
|
| User: "docremington" |
|
| Title: Re: U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not |
03 Sep 2006 08:10:48 PM |
|
|
snakehawk wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
explorerthedog wrote:
U. S. Forces Can Never Defeat The Terrorists In Iraq - because they
have an infinite supply of replacements,and we do not.
Then the obvious solution is to exterminate the populations from
which enemies recruit from.
Michael
Let us have a little fun.
Much easier: let's exterminate the object of their hatred. Just do the
math. There are billion of Muslims, but only 14 or 15 million Jews in
the whole world. The United States, Europe and Russia could export
all the Jews to Israel and nuke the place.
And all the arabs around. Oppps, collateral damage.
Or, even more economical
for the West, Just let the Muslims have their fun.
And get nuked.
The savings would be enormous. The price of oil would plummet.
By going right through the roof.
The
United States alone would immediately save $10 billion every year.
In losses? A modest estimate.
Germany could finally stop paying billions in reparations for some
mythical "Holocaust."
And start paying for gas.
The international dope trade would be reduced to
something manageable.
The US deals with the South America, mostly. The afghani heroin will
have its big comeback, russian, paki and other neighboring authorities
will look like the iranian president.
International prostitution rings would
practically disappear.
They would, actually, flourish, with so many arab females, streaming
out of the survived and not-so-survived arab hood, to fill the working
positions, promising to be fiery, releasing, what has been suppressed;
and the prices would drop dramatically, compared to all other things, a
gallon of gas in particular. Mormons will get a harem a gallon each and
convert them too as an added benefit.
Those multibillion-dollar wars in the Middle
Ease could end.
In The End.
World travel would be cheaper and safer.
A renaissance of paddling and [radioactive] windpower. The EU will get
their own "mexicans", holding arabs, poised to invade it en masse from
the North Africa, at gunpoint and shooting them up, occasionally.
France will, finally, use its military to shoot their dumb arab-muslim
solidarity riots up, and its L=E9gion =C9trang=E8re will have its hands
full, shooting arabs up out there in Africa.
The
Christians could start preaching Christianity again instead of the
present corrupt form of Judaism.
Everyone will be praying something, even atheists. Lots of things will
go to allahu akbar.
And people could read about other
things in their media besides warmongering propaganda, how to hate
Muslims, and why the West should attack Islam.
But the actual reading will be gas quotes together with foodstuff
quotes. And the US will be in the position to establish something like
an organisation of food-exporting countries cartel and have a good go
at Chavez.
That would be the best solution. We ought to put it to a vote.
Arabs-muslims will vote allahu akbar, it is JC (jihadically correct).
Full ahead to the past. Camel-humping gangs, roaming
robbing-shooting-raping one another and getting robbed-shot-raped. Are
we having fun yet?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|