| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"smitty" |
| Date: |
12 Mar 2006 11:29:02 AM |
| Object: |
US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
An Iraqi man smoking a cigarette was walking thru the rubble with his dog
minding his business. He comes upon several US troops standing outside a
Humvee. Words are exchanged as the Iraqi is not well spoken in the English
language and appears a bit confused as to what they want so he approaches as
he continues to smoke his ciggarette walking with his dog. All of a sudden
one of the troops open fires on the dog causing the dog to wail finally
dropping to the ground dying slowly. All this shocks the Iraqi who appears
very disgusted and confused at the incident and walks away ***** coming
back seconds later checking on his dog knowing that he is dead. After
confirming he is dead he continues to puff on the cigarette as he walks off
to sit on top of a rock in the rubble upset over the incident. Meanwhile
back at the Humvee the troop realizes that the whole incident was filmed by
the camera on the humvee. The other troops seem ***** about what he
just did. When the dog killing troop realizes he was filmed he tries to
justify the killing by saying the he felt threatened because the dog was
coming at him. When I saw the film my blood boiled, because the dog was
casually strolling 20 or 30 feet away at his masters feet not even looking
in there direction. He was walking just sniffing the ground minding his
business like most dogs do. That film just pissed me off and that troop
whoever he is/was is one lousy assed trigger happy *****, I hope he got
his whatever it may be.
.
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 09:33:33 AM |
|
|
Why didn't you post the film?
.
|
|
|
| User: "smitty" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 05:10:25 PM |
|
|
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:naXQf.12198$Uc2.6457@fed1read04...
Why didn't you post the film?
Dont have the link, saw it on TV.
.
|
|
|
| User: "-=-=-\TÆE-\N\-TÆE\-=-=-" |
|
| Title: From Yesterdays Post |
12 Mar 2006 03:18:04 PM |
|
|
It NEVER takes long for me to prove I was right about the left-wing buttboys
as Smitty just showed us. Here's what I said yesterday.
**** Their addiction to TV, and TV being reality to the left-wing buttboys.
Ever
noticed how the buttboys talk about a movie or a TV show being like a
particular current event? This is a constant and ever present fact when
listening to the squealing of a whining left-wing buttboy.****
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Christian Williamson" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 09:40:28 AM |
|
|
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's
called lying.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dion" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 10:00:57 AM |
|
|
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
Below are some lies by the Republican GWBush Administartion. These are the
lies that harm America. Posts on Usenet have not led to 2,307 deaths of
Americans in Iraq but these lies by the GWBush administration have. You go
right ahead and cheer on the GWBush administartion but you should know more
and more Americans are waking up to the lies.
Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein
now has weapons
of mass destruction.
***** Cheney
Speech to VFW National Convention
August 26, 2002
Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities
that were used for the production of biological
weapons.
George W. Bush
Speech to UN General Assembly
September 12, 2002
If he declares he has none, then we will know that
Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world.
Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
December 2, 2002
We know for a fact that there are weapons there.
Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
January 9, 2003
Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam
Hussein had the aterials to produce as much as 500
tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.
George W. Bush
State of the Union Address
January 28, 2003
We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his
weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make
more.
Colin Powell
Remarks to UN Security Council
February 5, 2003
We have sources that tell us that Saddam Hussein
recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use
chemical weapons -- the very weapons the dictator
tells us he does not have.
George W. Bush
Radio Address
February 8, 2003
If Iraq had disarmed itself, gotten rid of its
weapons of mass destruction over the past 12 years, or
over the last several months since (UN Resolution)
1441 was enacted, we would not be facing the crisis
that we now have before us . . . But the suggestion
that we are doing this because we want to go to every
country in the Middle East and rearrange all of its
pieces is not correct.
Colin Powell
Interview with Radio France International
February 28, 2003
So has the strategic decision been made to disarm
Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction by the
leadership in Baghdad? . . . I think our judgment has
to be clearly not.
Colin Powell
Remarks to UN Security Council
March 7, 2003
Intelligence gathered by this and other governments
leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to
possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons
ever devised.
George W. Bush
Address to the Nation
March 17, 2003
Well, there is no question that we have evidence
and information that Iraq has weapons of mass
destruction, biological and chemical particularly . .
.. all this will be made clear in
the course of the operation, for whatever duration it
takes.
Ari Fleisher
Press Briefing
March 21, 2003
There is no doubt that the regime of Saddam Hussein
possesses weapons of mass destruction. And . . . as
this operation continues, those weapons will be
identified, found, along with the people who have
produced them and who guard them.
Gen. Tommy Franks
Press Conference
March 22, 2003
I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of
weapons of mass destruction.
Defense Policy Board member Kenneth Adelman
Washington Post, p. A27
March 23, 2003
One of our top objectives is to find and destroy
the WMD. There are a number of sites.
Pentagon Spokeswoman Victoria Clark
Press Briefing
March 22, 2003
We know where they are. They're in the area around
Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north
somewhat.
Donald Rumsfeld
ABC Interview
March 30, 2003
Obviously the administration intends to publicize
all the weapons of mass destruction U.S. forces find
--and there will be plenty.
Neocon scholar Robert Kagan
Washington Post op-ed
April 9, 2003
But make no mistake -- as I said earlier -- we have
high confidence that they have weapons of mass
destruction. That is what this war was about and it is
about. And we have high confidence it will be found.
Ari Fleischer
Press Briefing
April 10, 2003
We are learning more as we interrogate or have
discussions with Iraqi scientists and people within
the Iraqi structure, that perhaps he destroyed some,
perhaps he dispersed some. And so we will find them.
George W. Bush
NBC Interview
April 24, 2003
There are people who in large measure have
information that we need . . . so that we can track
down the weapons of mass destruction in that country.
Donald Rumsfeld
Press Briefing
April 25, 2003
We'll find them. It'll be a matter of time to do so.
George W. Bush
Remarks to Reporters
May 3, 2003
I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass
destruction there and the evidence will be
forthcoming. We're just getting it just now.
Colin Powell
Remarks to Reporters
May 4, 2003
We never believed that we'd just tumble over
weapons of mass destruction in that country.
Donald Rumsfeld
Fox News Interview
May 4, 2003
I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons
program of Saddam Hussein -- because he had a weapons
program.
George W. Bush
Remarks to Reporters
May 6, 2003
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 10:30:47 AM |
|
|
"Dion" <dionnoreturn@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ueWdnQLaTckh2InZRVn-tw@comcast.com...
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
Below are some lies by the Republican GWBush Administartion.
Then these liberals lied also
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop
weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our
bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,
1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators
Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi
(D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton
Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: --
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate
of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e
means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd
(D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,
2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass
destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
.... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton
(D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob
Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
.... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mark Donovan" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 11:08:25 AM |
|
|
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
It's not about leftists vs. rightists. It's about morons vs. idiots.
Mark
.
|
|
|
| User: "OrionCA" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 12:26:40 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:08:25 GMT, "Mark Donovan" <md@md.kz> wrote:
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
It's not about leftists vs. rightists. It's about morons vs. idiots.
The Democrats do fight among themselves, yes.
--
"Even as the Times defended Echelon as "a necessity"
in 1999, evidence already existed that the Clintonites
had misused electronic surveillance for political
purposes. Intelligence officials told Insight magazine
in 1997 that they had spied on a 1993 conference of
Asian and Pacific world leaders in Seattle hosted by
Clinton and some of that information was passed on to
big Democratic corporate donors for use against their
competitors."
http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/opedcolumnists/60314.htm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 01:19:21 PM |
|
|
"OrionCA" <OrionCA@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:iup8129uvvtqo8g7cv0s0nn3t0bracp1mt@4ax.com...
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:08:25 GMT, "Mark Donovan" <md@md.kz> wrote:
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's
called
lying.
It's not about leftists vs. rightists. It's about morons vs. idiots.
The Democrats do fight among themselves, yes.
LOL, Good one.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Deaf Power" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 06:01:38 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:26:40 -0800, OrionCA <OrionCA@earthlink.net>
wrote:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:08:25 GMT, "Mark Donovan" <md@md.kz> wrote:
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
It's not about leftists vs. rightists. It's about morons vs. idiots.
The Democrats do fight among themselves, yes.
So do Republicans.
--
Bush = Nixon
https://political.moveon.org/donate/notillegal-QT.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Billy" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 10:27:40 AM |
|
|
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
Wait, I think I found it.
http://www.geocities.com/cecildn/DogAttack.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "xxx\TEE-INN-TEE\xxx" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 10:30:39 AM |
|
|
LOL!!!! Excellent!!
"Billy" <nevermind@cox.net> wrote in message
news:6ZXQf.12202$Uc2.1118@fed1read04...
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
Wait, I think I found it.
http://www.geocities.com/cecildn/DogAttack.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "SheBlewHimDidYouBlowHim" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 01:52:57 PM |
|
|
"Christian Williamson" <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:MhXQf.3571$o41.532@trnddc06...
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
hmmm, they must have gotten that trait from republicscums
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Winston Smith, American Patriot" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 10:30:15 AM |
|
|
Christian Williamson <c.willi@verizon.net> wrote in alt.politics.bush:
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's
called lying.
Abu Ghraib was a figment of leftist imagination...is that right?
--
http://hume.realisticpolitics.com/
Estimate the worth of a man by how sincerely he greets you.
Arrive at the worth of a man by how he opens himself to you.
Know the worth of a man by how conscientiously he listens to you.
Verify the worth of a man by how warmly he takes his leave of you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "JC" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 01:11:52 PM |
|
|
Christian Williamson wrote:
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's
called lying.
http://www.dumpalink.com/post/1111394478/American_Soldiers_Shoot_dogs_out_of_boredom
Some comments indicate that the dog had been hit by a car and was
injured.. others report that the video clip didn't show the first part
where the soldiers first shot the dog.
The *story* is from March 2005?
There *is* a video clip at the link above.
.
|
|
|
| User: "smitty" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 05:18:04 PM |
|
|
"JC" <JakeNichols@punkass.com> wrote in message
news:Xk_Qf.6091$HV2.5641@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Christian Williamson wrote:
Billy wrote:
Why didn't you post the film?
Because leftists regularly accuse without providing evidence. It's called
lying.
http://www.dumpalink.com/post/1111394478/American_Soldiers_Shoot_dogs_out_of_boredom
Some comments indicate that the dog had been hit by a car and was
injured.. others report that the video clip didn't show the first part
where the soldiers first shot the dog.
The *story* is from March 2005?
There *is* a video clip at the link above.
Thats not the same clip I saw. But just goes to show there are some sick *****
MFs wearing the US uniform.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "hob" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 03:06:33 PM |
|
|
nice story, but the story is a fairly tale
1) Iraqi Muslims do not have "pet dogs". The Koran has a problem with that.
2) And is the background in the video even Iraq?
3) Are US soldiers now wandering around the Iraq countryside without armor,
casually "tooling it" in short sleeves?
4) It looks a lot more like a big retriever in the US than any of the
common dogs from that area of the mideast.
Further, the video shows what any responsible person would do if they saw a
sick or injured dog. For all you know, that dog was rabid, injured by a
passing car, or boobytrapped -
Further still, even by some chance it is in Iraq and is an Iraqi dog, since
the only people in Iraq who see dogs as pets and likely would help a sick
"pet" would be the Americans, a hurt dog is perfect bait for the
insurgents - break its back to cripple it and boobytrap the dog with a
grenade.
Despite what you see in the movies, sick unattended animals in war zones
are to be killed from a distance, not coddled.
"smitty" <smit@smitt.com> wrote in message
news:1218fi3om2mcg28@corp.supernews.com...
An Iraqi man smoking a cigarette was walking thru the rubble with his dog
minding his business. He comes upon several US troops standing outside a
Humvee. Words are exchanged as the Iraqi is not well spoken in the English
language and appears a bit confused as to what they want so he approaches
as
he continues to smoke his ciggarette walking with his dog. All of a sudden
one of the troops open fires on the dog causing the dog to wail finally
dropping to the ground dying slowly. All this shocks the Iraqi who appears
very disgusted and confused at the incident and walks away *****
coming
back seconds later checking on his dog knowing that he is dead. After
confirming he is dead he continues to puff on the cigarette as he walks
off
to sit on top of a rock in the rubble upset over the incident. Meanwhile
back at the Humvee the troop realizes that the whole incident was filmed
by
the camera on the humvee. The other troops seem ***** about what he
just did. When the dog killing troop realizes he was filmed he tries to
justify the killing by saying the he felt threatened because the dog was
coming at him. When I saw the film my blood boiled, because the dog was
casually strolling 20 or 30 feet away at his masters feet not even looking
in there direction. He was walking just sniffing the ground minding his
business like most dogs do. That film just pissed me off and that troop
whoever he is/was is one lousy assed trigger happy *****, I hope he got
his whatever it may be.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gogarty" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 03:19:07 PM |
|
|
In article <pJidnUZ_AZOiEInZnZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@comcast.com>,
dehoberg@comcast.net says...
nice story, but the story is a fairly tale
1) Iraqi Muslims do not have "pet dogs". The Koran has a problem with that.
2) And is the background in the video even Iraq?
3) Are US soldiers now wandering around the Iraq countryside without armor,
casually "tooling it" in short sleeves?
4) It looks a lot more like a big retriever in the US than any of the
common dogs from that area of the mideast.
Further, the video shows what any responsible person would do if they saw a
sick or injured dog. For all you know, that dog was rabid, injured by a
passing car, or boobytrapped -
Further still, even by some chance it is in Iraq and is an Iraqi dog, since
the only people in Iraq who see dogs as pets and likely would help a sick
"pet" would be the Americans, a hurt dog is perfect bait for the
insurgents - break its back to cripple it and boobytrap the dog with a
grenade.
Despite what you see in the movies, sick unattended animals in war zones
are to be killed from a distance, not coddled.
"smitty" <smit@smitt.com> wrote in message
news:1218fi3om2mcg28@corp.supernews.com...
An Iraqi man smoking a cigarette was walking thru the rubble with his dog
minding his business. He comes upon several US troops standing outside a
Humvee. Words are exchanged as the Iraqi is not well spoken in the English
language and appears a bit confused as to what they want so he approaches
as
he continues to smoke his ciggarette walking with his dog. All of a sudden
one of the troops open fires on the dog causing the dog to wail finally
dropping to the ground dying slowly. All this shocks the Iraqi who appears
very disgusted and confused at the incident and walks away *****
coming
back seconds later checking on his dog knowing that he is dead. After
confirming he is dead he continues to puff on the cigarette as he walks
off
to sit on top of a rock in the rubble upset over the incident. Meanwhile
back at the Humvee the troop realizes that the whole incident was filmed
by
the camera on the humvee. The other troops seem ***** about what he
just did. When the dog killing troop realizes he was filmed he tries to
justify the killing by saying the he felt threatened because the dog was
coming at him. When I saw the film my blood boiled, because the dog was
casually strolling 20 or 30 feet away at his masters feet not even looking
in there direction. He was walking just sniffing the ground minding his
business like most dogs do. That film just pissed me off and that troop
whoever he is/was is one lousy assed trigger happy *****, I hope he got
his whatever it may be.
Not vouching for anything in this story, however:
A. There is a substantial Christian community in Iraq;
B. Christians got nothing against pet dogs.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bushs Failed War" |
|
| Title: Re: US Troop Kills Pet Dog |
12 Mar 2006 01:38:12 PM |
|
|
smitty wrote:
An Iraqi man smoking a cigarette was walking thru the rubble with his dog
minding his business. He comes upon several US troops standing outside a
Humvee. Words are exchanged as the Iraqi is not well spoken in the English
language and appears a bit confused as to what they want so he approaches as
he continues to smoke his ciggarette walking with his dog. All of a sudden
one of the troops open fires on the dog causing the dog to wail finally
dropping to the ground dying slowly. All this shocks the Iraqi who appears
very disgusted and confused at the incident and walks away ***** coming
back seconds later checking on his dog knowing that he is dead. After
confirming he is dead he continues to puff on the cigarette as he walks off
to sit on top of a rock in the rubble upset over the incident. Meanwhile
back at the Humvee the troop realizes that the whole incident was filmed by
the camera on the humvee. The other troops seem ***** about what he
just did. When the dog killing troop realizes he was filmed he tries to
justify the killing by saying the he felt threatened because the dog was
coming at him. When I saw the film my blood boiled, because the dog was
casually strolling 20 or 30 feet away at his masters feet not even looking
in there direction. He was walking just sniffing the ground minding his
business like most dogs do. That film just pissed me off and that troop
whoever he is/was is one lousy assed trigger happy *****, I hope he got
his whatever it may be.
Some soldiers enjoy thrill killings.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
