Politics > Politics-USA > Video Of Torture Master John Yoo, co-author of The Patriot Act, Being Asked To Justify "Crushing children's testicles" policy. YES even raping infants with acid sticks and using pliers to torture infants' genitals in front of their parents USA!#1
| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
05 Apr 2007 12:19:09 PM |
| Object: |
Video Of Torture Master John Yoo, co-author of The Patriot Act, Being Asked To Justify "Crushing children's testicles" policy. YES even raping infants with acid sticks and using pliers to torture infants' genitals in front of their parents USA!#1 |
http://video.google.com/url?docid=-8701740060209973229&esrc=sr1&ev=v&q=%22john+yoo%22&vidurl=http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3Dhz01hN9l-BM&usg=AL29H231srGQLLTnskJpcidWubClr73o7A
The Baker Institute Student Forum (BISF) hosted a discussion involving
three panelists on November 3 2006, one of which was John Yoo, co
author of the PATRIOT ACT and various controversial "torture" memos.
Yoo is asked by an Infowars reader to explain the moral justification
for crushing a child's testicles or raping a child in front of a
parent.
The Baker Institute Student Forum (BISF) hosted a discussion involving
three panelists on November 3 2006, one of which was John Yoo, co
author of the PATRIOT ACT and various controversial memos in which he
advocated the possible legality of torture and that enemy combatants
could be denied protection under the Geneva Conventions. Yoo also
decreed that it was legal to declare war anytime, any where, and on
anyone the President deemed a threat.
Skip forward to 1hr: 39mins: 43seconds: [VIDEO]
Yoo is asked by an Infowars reader to explain the moral justification
for crushing a child's testicles or raping a child in front of a
parent.
Yoo backtracks on previous comments he made during a December 1st
debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human
rights scholar Doug Cassel, John Yoo gave the green light for the
scope of torture to legally include sexual torture of infants.
Cassel: If the president deems that he's got to torture somebody,
including by crushing the testicles of the person's child, there is no
law that can stop him?
Yoo: No treaty.
Cassel: Also no law by Congress - that is what you wrote in the August
2002 memo...
Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do
that.
Video Of Torture Master John Yoo Being Asked To Justify "Crushing
Children's Testicles" Comments
Infowars.net
Thursday, February 1, 2007
The Baker Institute Student Forum (BISF) hosted a discussion involving
three panelists on November 3 2006, one of which was John Yoo, co
author of the PATRIOT ACT and various controversial memos in which he
advocated the possible legality of torture and that enemy combatants
could be denied protection under the Geneva Conventions. Yoo also
decreed that it was legal to declare war anytime, any where, and on
anyone the President deemed a threat.
Skip forward to 1hr: 39mins: 43seconds:
Yoo is asked by an Infowars reader to explain the moral justification
for crushing a child's testicles or raping a child in front of a
parent.
Yoo backtracks on previous comments he made during a December 1st
debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human
rights scholar Doug Cassel, John Yoo gave the green light for the
scope of torture to legally include sexual torture of infants.
Cassel: If the president deems that he's got to torture somebody,
including by crushing the testicles of the person's child, there is no
law that can stop him?
Yoo: No treaty.
Cassel: Also no law by Congress - that is what you wrote in the August
2002 memo...
Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do
that.
Click here for the audio.
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/yoo-1.mp3
Yoo suggests that his comments were taken out of context and blames
the internet suggesting that you "can't believe everything you hear on
the internet".
Yoo cannot deny that there is no moral justification for the actions
he argued were technically legal. Yoo is using the legal argument to
hide behind a clear avocation of genocide.
Yoo argues presidential powers on Constitutional grounds, but where in
the Constitution does it say the President can order the torture of
children? Georgetown Law Professor David Cole wrote, "Yoo reasoned
that because the Constitution makes the President the 'Commander-in-
Chief,' no law can restrict the actions he may take in pursuit of war.
On this reasoning, the President would be entitled by the Constitution
to resort to genocide if he wished."
Last September the Senate officially gave President Bush the legal
authority to abduct and sexually mutilate American citizens and
American children in the name of the war on terror when it passed new
detainee legislation.
http://infowars.net/articles/february2007/010207Yoo.htm
"We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it
in blood as well as in words and money."
-Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in "Foreign Affairs," July/August Issue 1995
http://video.google.com/url?docid=-8701740060209973229&esrc=sr1&ev=v&q=%22john+yoo%22&vidurl=http://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3Dhz01hN9l-BM&usg=AL29H231srGQLLTnskJpcidWubClr73o7A
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
