| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Roedy Green" |
| Date: |
08 Dec 2003 01:06:04 AM |
| Object: |
Waning Bush Support |
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
| User: "######" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 08:02:07 AM |
|
|
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote in
message news:9488tvs0ulfms0hasdcf5k7mudtbujd3l9@4ax.com...
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
However true or untrue your other statements, this one is wrong. The
internet is *not* an indicator of the predominant TRUTH.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Server 13" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 12:26:01 PM |
|
|
###### wrote:
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote in
message news:9488tvs0ulfms0hasdcf5k7mudtbujd3l9@4ax.com...
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
However true or untrue your other statements, this one is wrong. The
internet is *not* an indicator of the predominant TRUTH.
Uh... "predominant truth"..?
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 12:53:17 PM |
|
|
"######" <nu_user@webtv.jiz> wrote in message news:<zv%Ab.4379$7p2.734@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote in
message news:9488tvs0ulfms0hasdcf5k7mudtbujd3l9@4ax.com...
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
However true or untrue your other statements, this one is wrong. The
internet is *not* an indicator of the predominant TRUTH.
It is when compared to the U.S. mass media.
It seems more stories have been broken by Internet based news sources
than by the mass media.
The Drudge Report, for example, is well-known for not only getting it
right, but getting it first. And yes, he's also known for getting it
wrong.
Another example of getting it right and getting it first is Josh
Marshall.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Leland Milton Goldblatt PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
09 Dec 2003 09:34:34 PM |
|
|
you should have heard those idiots from his state saying how they felt
sorry for him. the sucker he manslaughter on the bike may have voted
for him if he was a member of abate.
Republicans want to starve kids, kick old people out on the street,
make poor people have to eat dog food to survive, poison the air, land
and water and kill millions of American kids with your imperialist
wars.
Shalom,
---Prof. Leland Milton Goldblatt, Ph.D. ®
Copyright © 2003
http://www.ivycollege.com
http://www.prof.faithweb.com
http://drgoldblatt.blogspot.com/
HAIL to the THIEF! Not my president. IMPEACH HE SUPREME COURT!
"If the goal of President Bush's foreign policy was to make America
weaker, more vulnerable and more hated, mission accomplished."
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -525 billion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -433 GIs
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 02:03:32 AM |
|
|
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There IS a way that Bush could do himself some real good.
But me telling, would spoil it for the Democrats.
Besides, Republican strategists should have thought of it themselves by now.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "MHirtes" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 02:32:52 AM |
|
|
In article <9488tvs0ulfms0hasdcf5k7mudtbujd3l9@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote:
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
Probably because only the most batshit insane can defend the Bush
Mafia's idiotic, fascist policies.
I mean, trying to send Turks into Iraq? WTF was Bush thinking? WAS Bush
thinking at all? Jeez!
And surrounding Iraqi cities with barbed wire and checkpoints a La
Israel is NOT gonna win any hearts and minds there, I'll tell you.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 02:48:57 AM |
|
|
In article <9488tvs0ulfms0hasdcf5k7mudtbujd3l9@4ax.com>,
Roedy Green <look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote:
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
Probably because only the most batshit insane can defend the Bush
Mafia's idiotic, fascist policies.
I mean, trying to send Turks into Iraq? WTF was Bush thinking? WAS Bush
thinking at all? Jeez!
And surrounding Iraqi cities with barbed wire and checkpoints a La
Israel is NOT gonna win any hearts and minds there, I'll tell you.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It's not going to win any hearts and minds when the Iraqi elections eventually come round.
The people on the wrong side of the barbed wire are going to vote for the anti-Bush candidate.
Like everybody else in the world.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "PagCal" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 05:48:15 AM |
|
|
Never mind the internet, large constituencies have started to turn
against Bush. They include:
1) The military. Once our troops got on the ground, they could see the
truth in Afghanistan and Iraq. And the truth is, Bush's feeble attempts
at nation building are an abject failure. And as a result of extending
stints up to 18 months, many regular and reserve forces will be leaving
at the end of their stint - voting with their feet, as it were.
2) Veterans. Bush has consistently under funded veterans programs.
3) US Steel Workers. Bush backed away from a commitment to them for
protection from unfair foreign imports for 3 years. You think these guys
are going to kiss and make up come next November?
4) True American Patriotic Republicans. There's a lot of these around
who believe that Bush has betrayed them, especially when it comes to a
leaner and meaner government with a balanced budget - two points at
which Bush is even worse than the Democrats.
.
|
|
|
| User: "B. Ranshaw" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 06:40:45 AM |
|
|
Don't forget about seniors who will have figured out what the Medicare bill
was before the election comes around.
And all those Americans of the Islamic faith.
And all the Christians who should soon realize that Bush really doesn't want
Armageddon.
Etc...
--
---------------------
"Congress worked late into the night this past weekend to pass a Medicare
prescription drug bill that represents the single largest expansion of the
federal welfare state since the Great Society programs of the 1960s. The new
Medicare drug plan enriches pharmaceutical companies, fleeces taxpayers, and
forces millions of older Americans to accept inferior drug coverage - while
doing nothing to address the real reasons prescription drugs cost so
much..."
Ron Paul, Republican congressman.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tulips" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
09 Dec 2003 07:06:49 AM |
|
|
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:06:04 GMT, Roedy Green
<look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote:
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
I noticed that too.
I think most of the Bush supporters in these groups are ...hehe...
.....males in puberty. I have a couple of friends who are a few years
younger than me that are flag-waiving Bush supporters only because
their fathers are. When I asked them why we attacked Iraq my friend
said "because they attacked us on 9-11." ...It's just so sad. it is.
--
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Julian D." |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 04:15:16 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:06:04 GMT, Roedy Green
<look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote:
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
You forgot #6, ya crazy lunatic.
6. Bush supporters are sitting back, watching the democrats seethe
and froth at the mouth over their constant, but consistent,
ineffectiveness towards bashing the president. The economy is doing
better all the time, we will not cut and run in Iraq, and the dem
contenders are starting to eat each other alive. In fact, the
Republicans are looking forward to even MORE looniness by the
democrats as they turn off more of the American voting public with
their vitriolic and venomous tirades. The American people do not want
to keep hearing about how terrible Bush is, how wrong America is.
Bush IS being attacked because of attacking the terrorists. Bush's
campaign, championing that idea, has hardly begun.
Democrats are doomed in 2004 for siding with France.
JD
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence
reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his
chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile
delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists,
including Al Qaeda members..."
---- Hillary Clinton, Oct 10, 2002
"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and
tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike?
If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words and all recriminations
would come too late."
-President George W. Bush
January 28, 2003
(Another liberal lie exposed.)
.
|
|
|
| User: "cd" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
09 Dec 2003 06:41:48 AM |
|
|
Bush hasnt "attacked" any terrorists.... anywhere!
Dropping bunker busters on empty caves for photo ops in Afghanistan did
nothing, obviously. Besides, there arent even any arabs IN afghanistan....
hidden consipiracy and failed attempt number 1.
Never in the history of time has there been any Iraqi terrorists. In fact,
peace and soverignty will NEVER be as prominent over there as it was before
Dumbya's small-*****-syndrome campaign. Even the American trained Iraqi
police still have pictures of Saddam in their homes. Bush's hidden
conspiracy and failed attempt number 2.
Do a little research. There are more channels on TV than nascar, wrestling,
and monster truck pulls, conservative simpletons. There's REAL fair and
balanced information out there.... but not by rupert murdoch's fox and
friends.
"Julian D." <jules@ersatz.com> wrote in message
news:dkt9tvk7s0v0g9q3hltdu6v00ok5frufql@4ax.com...
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 07:06:04 GMT, Roedy Green
<look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote:
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
You forgot #6, ya crazy lunatic.
6. Bush supporters are sitting back, watching the democrats seethe
and froth at the mouth over their constant, but consistent,
ineffectiveness towards bashing the president. The economy is doing
better all the time, we will not cut and run in Iraq, and the dem
contenders are starting to eat each other alive. In fact, the
Republicans are looking forward to even MORE looniness by the
democrats as they turn off more of the American voting public with
their vitriolic and venomous tirades. The American people do not want
to keep hearing about how terrible Bush is, how wrong America is.
Bush IS being attacked because of attacking the terrorists. Bush's
campaign, championing that idea, has hardly begun.
Democrats are doomed in 2004 for siding with France.
JD
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence
reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his
chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile
delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists,
including Al Qaeda members..."
---- Hillary Clinton, Oct 10, 2002
"Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when
have terrorists and
tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before
they strike?
If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all
words and all recriminations
would come too late."
-President George W. Bush
January 28, 2003
(Another liberal lie exposed.)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Aldrich" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 02:31:44 AM |
|
|
Roedy Green wrote:
A while back, the posts pro and con on Bush were about 50-50. Now It
seems to be about 5-95. At least on the Internet, the pro-Bush camp
have gone quiet.
This could have many causes:
1. the war is carrying on as before. There are no new issues, so the
pro Bush camp simply have lost interest in the debate.
No new points the Dems have brought up
2. The pro Bush camp are resting up for the coming campaign. Which
Democrat is the contender is not particularly interesting to them, so
their political interests in general are hibernating.
Why say a word, Dean ahead in Dem race, what more can they ask for.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
Nothing new to defend except a dedate about a plastic turkey.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
See how quiet it is in a few months from now
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in.
Your on drugs
The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
If the Dems had a serious candidate, that probadly would be in order.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MHirtes" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 12:14:17 PM |
|
|
In article <3FD436F0.A4659ED0@usenetserver.com>,
Tom Aldrich <TomAlrich@usenetserver.com> wrote:
Why say a word, Dean ahead in Dem race, what more can they ask for.
A: Dean in the Oval Office, asking for a Senate investigation on all the
crimes that Bush and his goons have done.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
Nothing new to defend except a dedate about a plastic turkey.
Ah, Tommie seems to be one of those "batshit insane" types I warned
everyone about.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
See how quiet it is in a few months from now
Oh? And why is that? I bet the TRUTH that leaks out then will even make
the atrocities of right now look nostalgic. As far as the Bush Mafia is
concerned, if they can get away with it, they'll do it. They don't care
if something is "illegal" or not.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in.
Your on drugs
If he was, then at least he can get them cheap in Afghanistsan (thanks,
Bush!).
The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
If the Dems had a serious candidate, that probadly would be in order.
You just don't get it, do you? Bush is the WORST president that EVER
walked the Earth! He barely qualifies as a human! He does not give one
rat's ***** about the welfare or the safety of any man, woman, or child
that is not filthy stinking rich.
And this sniveling little worm should start getting ready for a total
defeat this coming November, because The People won't stand for his
abuse any longer.
And by the way:
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Seems interesting how Canadian wants Bush to remain in power so badly.
What? Are you COUNTING on the USA collapsing into a pile of wreckage so
that Canada can take over as the #1 North American nation?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 06:49:53 PM |
|
|
MHirtes wrote:
In article <3FD436F0.A4659ED0@usenetserver.com>,
Tom Aldrich <TomAlrich@usenetserver.com> wrote:
Why say a word, Dean ahead in Dem race, what more can they ask for.
A: Dean in the Oval Office, asking for a Senate investigation on all the
crimes that Bush and his goons have done.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
Nothing new to defend except a dedate about a plastic turkey.
Ah, Tommie seems to be one of those "batshit insane" types I warned
everyone about.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
See how quiet it is in a few months from now
Oh? And why is that? I bet the TRUTH that leaks out then will even make
the atrocities of right now look nostalgic. As far as the Bush Mafia is
concerned, if they can get away with it, they'll do it. They don't care
if something is "illegal" or not.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in.
Your on drugs
If he was, then at least he can get them cheap in Afghanistsan (thanks,
Bush!).
The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
If the Dems had a serious candidate, that probadly would be in order.
You just don't get it, do you? Bush is the WORST president that EVER
walked the Earth! He barely qualifies as a human! He does not give one
rat's ***** about the welfare or the safety of any man, woman, or child
that is not filthy stinking rich.
And this sniveling little worm should start getting ready for a total
defeat this coming November, because The People won't stand for his
abuse any longer.
And by the way:
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Seems interesting how Canadian wants Bush to remain in power so badly.
What? Are you COUNTING on the USA collapsing into a pile of wreckage so
that Canada can take over as the #1 North American nation?
You're not addressing the correct poster.
Roedy does not support Bush and wants him out as badly as the rest of
us.
--
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act.
- George Orwell
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Aldrich" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 01:47:13 PM |
|
|
MHirtes wrote:
In article <3FD436F0.A4659ED0@usenetserver.com>,
Tom Aldrich <TomAlrich@usenetserver.com> wrote:
Why say a word, Dean ahead in Dem race, what more can they ask for.
A: Dean in the Oval Office, asking for a Senate investigation on all the
crimes that Bush and his goons have done.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't feel
like defending him any more.
Nothing new to defend except a dedate about a plastic turkey.
Ah, Tommie seems to be one of those "batshit insane" types I warned
everyone about.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
See how quiet it is in a few months from now
Oh? And why is that? I bet the TRUTH that leaks out then will even make
the atrocities of right now look nostalgic. As far as the Bush Mafia is
concerned, if they can get away with it, they'll do it. They don't care
if something is "illegal" or not.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in.
Your on drugs
If he was, then at least he can get them cheap in Afghanistsan (thanks,
Bush!).
The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
If the Dems had a serious candidate, that probadly would be in order.
You just don't get it, do you? Bush is the WORST president that EVER
walked the Earth! He barely qualifies as a human!
You won't get an arguement from me there, but the antidote is worse.
He does not give one
rat's ***** about the welfare or the safety of any man, woman, or child
that is not filthy stinking rich.
And this sniveling little worm should start getting ready for a total
defeat this coming November, because The People won't stand for his
abuse any longer.
And by the way:
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Seems interesting how Canadian wants Bush to remain in power so badly.
What? Are you COUNTING on the USA collapsing into a pile of wreckage so
that Canada can take over as the #1 North American nation?
.
|
|
|
| User: "EagleEye" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 02:12:53 PM |
|
|
Bush IS toast. Everyone knows it now. And EVERYONE who's anyone is saying it
now out loud, and whatever two or more agree on is binding.
Even the most staunch Republicans and prior Bush supporters are getting
ready to break ranks just because of this Presidency.
Recents polls are a farce. They are likely more misinformation and
propaganda.
Bush is holding power now solely on the media's seeming unending loyalty,
and other than that, by the very thinest of threads.
It WILL unravel and soon. Can't not. Bush can't use the human will to power
as a counterweight to the universal force of moral gravity. It's just not
possible.
Bush's star rose with 9/11 as a black hole death star unto the nation and
the world, and he will be soundly defeated, in shame I might add, just as
sure as night turns to day, and winter gives way to spring.
Bush has now to contend with the very forces of nature and the will of God
Almighty, and there is simply no way on earth or in heaven above that even
he, and all the darkness which surrounds him, will be able to withstand the
coming enslaught of the LIGHT.
The eye is open, and it has set its sights upon this Presidency as the very
source of everything that is wrong with modern society.
That the evil of the Bush administration is so profoundly evil that it cuts
right to the very core of our own human sinfulness is his only hope, the
only foundation upon which he could possibly win re-election.
But I, being the eternal optimist about the nature of man and of man's
relationship with God, cannot fathom that he will be able to make the
American people, through fear and "terra" shut that eye, and turn out the
light, on this rising tide of civil conscious awareness.
If there is one thing that evil hates, it is the light, and so we will now
begin to bear witness to the attempt by the government of the United States
to do everything within its power, perhaps stopping short of nothing to
blind and to darken, but this will only make that light and enduring spirit
all the stronger in the process.
The lines are being drawn, and Mr. Bush and team are clearly on the wrong
side of history.
Is it true that Ashcroft's father poured oil on his head just before he was
sworn in?
How ironic, given the significance of what that really means in terms of
sheep, and the small flies which can infest their heads and which unoiled,
will cause them to go insane with the infestation, running around and even
smashing their little heads against trees and fenceposts.
"Tom Aldrich" <TomAlrich@usenetserver.com> wrote in message
news:3FD4D541.37F6AAC0@usenetserver.com...
MHirtes wrote:
In article <3FD436F0.A4659ED0@usenetserver.com>,
Tom Aldrich <TomAlrich@usenetserver.com> wrote:
Why say a word, Dean ahead in Dem race, what more can they ask for.
A: Dean in the Oval Office, asking for a Senate investigation on all the
crimes that Bush and his goons have done.
3. They feel ashamed of the commander in chief, and really don't
feel
like defending him any more.
Nothing new to defend except a dedate about a plastic turkey.
Ah, Tommie seems to be one of those "batshit insane" types I warned
everyone about.
4. They are totally disillusioned. They don't want to show their
faces
since they were so obviously wrong about the president and the
Republican administration. There is so much crookedness bubbling up
every day, there is no way to deny it all.
See how quiet it is in a few months from now
Oh? And why is that? I bet the TRUTH that leaks out then will even make
the atrocities of right now look nostalgic. As far as the Bush Mafia is
concerned, if they can get away with it, they'll do it. They don't care
if something is "illegal" or not.
5. It has proved impossible to hide every piece of the president's
wrongdoing. It is impossible not to stumble over some of it, even
with your ears plugged. Perhaps Republicans feel betrayed by the
president and the national party. It is not the party they believe
in.
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in.
Your on drugs
If he was, then at least he can get them cheap in Afghanistsan (thanks,
Bush!).
The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up.
It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
If I were a Republican strategist right now, I would get my Plan B
in
order with a backup candidate to replace Bush, someone with
unassailable integrity with no Bush ties at all.
If the Dems had a serious candidate, that probadly would be in order.
You just don't get it, do you? Bush is the WORST president that EVER
walked the Earth! He barely qualifies as a human!
You won't get an arguement from me there, but the antidote is worse.
He does not give one
rat's ***** about the welfare or the safety of any man, woman, or child
that is not filthy stinking rich.
And this sniveling little worm should start getting ready for a total
defeat this coming November, because The People won't stand for his
abuse any longer.
And by the way:
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Seems interesting how Canadian wants Bush to remain in power so badly.
What? Are you COUNTING on the USA collapsing into a pile of wreckage so
that Canada can take over as the #1 North American nation?
.
|
|
|
| User: "MHirtes" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 11:03:32 PM |
|
|
In article <4X4Bb.9725$3y1.822794@news20.bellglobal.com>,
"EagleEye" <eagleeye@omega.org> wrote:
Bush IS toast. Everyone knows it now. And EVERYONE who's anyone is saying it
now out loud, and whatever two or more agree on is binding.
Even the most staunch Republicans and prior Bush supporters are getting
ready to break ranks just because of this Presidency.
Recents polls are a farce. They are likely more misinformation and
propaganda.
Bush is holding power now solely on the media's seeming unending loyalty,
and other than that, by the very thinest of threads.
And these media overlords better decide soon on which side of the fence
they wanna sit on, because if they continue betraying their duty and
choose to spew out lies & GOP propaganda instead of truth, they are
going to go down in flames as much as the GOP will.
It WILL unravel and soon. Can't not. Bush can't use the human will to power
as a counterweight to the universal force of moral gravity. It's just not
possible.
Never underestimate the bottomless sense of gall Bush has. He has NO
grip on reality.
Bush's star rose with 9/11 as a black hole death star unto the nation and
the world, and he will be soundly defeated, in shame I might add, just as
sure as night turns to day, and winter gives way to spring.
If Bush manages to sleaze another "victory" expect the Winter to be
eternal (and possibly nuclear).
Bush has now to contend with the very forces of nature and the will of God
Almighty,
Bush has been hearing the LIE about him being God's chosen leader so
log, he actually believes it.
and there is simply no way on earth or in heaven above that even
he, and all the darkness which surrounds him, will be able to withstand the
coming enslaught of the LIGHT.
The eye is open, and it has set its sights upon this Presidency as the very
source of everything that is wrong with modern society.
In the past two years, a lot of Americans have managed to "escape the
Matrix" that the Bush Mafia has imposed on us all since 9/11/01.
Hopefully in the next 11 months there will be many more and they will be
eager to join in the fight to free themselves from GOP dominion.
(At this point, most of the frothing repug posters here usually belch
out a comment or two about "those liberal democrat fantasies". These
loons have no minds of their own, so their way of "thinking" is almost
predictable)
That the evil of the Bush administration is so profoundly evil that it cuts
right to the very core of our own human sinfulness is his only hope, the
only foundation upon which he could possibly win re-election.
But I, being the eternal optimist about the nature of man and of man's
relationship with God, cannot fathom that he will be able to make the
American people, through fear and "terra" shut that eye, and turn out the
light, on this rising tide of civil conscious awareness.
If there is one thing that evil hates, it is the light, and so we will now
begin to bear witness to the attempt by the government of the United States
to do everything within its power, perhaps stopping short of nothing to
blind and to darken, but this will only make that light and enduring spirit
all the stronger in the process.
I kind of HOPE some GOP goon tries to intimidate me at the polling place
(like they did all over the country during the 2000 elections). Ohhhhhhh
yeah. THAT suicidal ***** will be in the for worst night of his
fascist life, and quite possibly his last.
The lines are being drawn, and Mr. Bush and team are clearly on the wrong
side of history.
Is it true that Ashcroft's father poured oil on his head just before he was
sworn in?
No, Ashcroft annointed himself. Ashcroft felt that no one else was
worthy to annoint Ashcroft BUT Ashcroft.
How ironic, given the significance of what that really means in terms of
sheep, and the small flies which can infest their heads and which unoiled,
will cause them to go insane with the infestation, running around and even
smashing their little heads against trees and fenceposts.
That's the fate of all Americans if Bush clings onto power after next
year. The ONLY thing keeping that little spoiled brat "civil" is the
fact that there's a reelection to try to monkeywrench.
Once he manages to get past that hurdle and he doesn't have to give a
damn about the American People, may God have mercy on ALL our souls
(repug and Democrat alike). Hell On Earth will truly take place.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MHirtes" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 10:46:35 PM |
|
|
In article <3FD4D541.37F6AAC0@usenetserver.com>,
Tom Aldrich <TomAlrich@usenetserver.com> wrote:
You won't get an arguement from me there, but the antidote is worse.
ANYONE but Bush is a BETTER alternative, period!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Leland Milton Goldblatt PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 07:50:45 PM |
|
|
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -525 billion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -455 GIs
On May 1, 2003, President George W. Bush stood on the deck of the
aircraft carrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln and announced the end of the
Iraq war. However, the ensuing peace has not been kind.
(n "unelected" president because he was "appointed by the United
States Supreme Court)
Bush, the troops are heroes the ones that are not being killedd
daily. Saddam has fallen, But Bush can't find him. Do you really
feel safer that Saddam is out of Power? If the war was about reducing
the threat of terrorism, we've inflamed the resentment in much of the
Arab world. Osama bin Laden is free as a bird.
Three cheers for Dubya's fantastic foreign policy! From breaking off
diplomatic relations with North Korea when his administration began,
to ignoring and/or insulting them for two years (Bush has said
publicly that he "loathes" Kim Jong Il) the Bush administration's
foreign policy seemed to revolve around one simple plan: do the
complete opposite of whatever Bill Clinton did. And Since Bill
Clinton's foreign policy attempted to keep the peace around the world,
it's now no surprise that we're on the brink of Dubya-Dubya-Three.
Unfortunately George and The Gang's plans fell apart at the seams last
week when it was decided that they might in fact help North Korea with
its energy and food problems after all, providing that they stop
developing nuclear weapons. Which was, of course, Bill Clinton's plan
in the first place. But wait, there's a big difference! See, according
to George, inviting North Korea to blackmail the U.S. and then giving
in to them in no way means that we're rewarding "bad behavior." And
just because we're "talking" with North Korea doesn't mean we're
"negotiating." Yeah, way to show that evil dictator who's boss,
George.
Shalom,
---Prof. Leland Milton Goldblatt, Ph.D. ®
Reverend Chancellor Leland Milton Goldblatt Ph.D. ED.D. M.F.A, D.Div.
M.Theo .
Copyright © 2003
http://www.prof.faithweb.com
http://www.ivycollege.com
http://drgoldblatt.blogspot.com/
http://www.voxfux.com
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Aldrich" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 10:30:49 PM |
|
|
Leland Milton Goldblatt PhD wrote:
The Bush 'balanced' budget: -525 billion and worsening
The Bush 'economic' policy: -3 million jobs and counting
The Bush Iraq lie: -455 GIs
On May 1, 2003, President George W. Bush stood on the deck of the
aircraft carrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln and announced the end of the
Iraq war. However, the ensuing peace has not been kind.
(n "unelected" president because he was "appointed by the United
States Supreme Court)
Bush, the troops are heroes the ones that are not being killedd
daily. Saddam has fallen, But Bush can't find him. Do you really
feel safer that Saddam is out of Power?
Ask the Iraqi people that.
If the war was about reducing
the threat of terrorism, we've inflamed the resentment in much of the
Arab world. Osama bin Laden is free as a bird.
One should bear in mind that 9/11 plot was hatched during the Clinton
adminertration. To be blunt there is no way to appease these terrorist
except by surrenduring to their wishs.
Iraq can be seen as a wrong decision on the war on terrorism, but we must
never fail to understand that a war on terrorism should be fought.
Three cheers for Dubya's fantastic foreign policy! From breaking off
diplomatic relations with North Korea when his administration began,
to ignoring and/or insulting them for two years (Bush has said
publicly that he "loathes" Kim Jong Il)
I'm interested in what is to like about Kim Jong II.
Shalom,
---Prof. Leland Milton Goldblatt, Ph.D. ®
Reverend Chancellor Leland Milton Goldblatt Ph.D. ED.D. M.F.A, D.Div.
M.Theo .
Copyright © 2003
http://www.prof.faithweb.com
http://www.ivycollege.com
http://drgoldblatt.blogspot.com/
http://www.voxfux.com
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Leland Milton Goldblatt PhD" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 08:33:36 PM |
|
|
Newt Goes Nuclear on Bush who is wrongly called president ! Bizarre,
Bizarre! Newt Gingrich, a quiet Rumsfeld confidant, thinks the U.S.
went ‘off a cliff' in Iraq.
Bush appears clue-less what to do about the economy. We could inpeach
the theif constitutionally ie, spare the country that experience by
easing Bush out of office, especially given that a plurality of
American voters wanted Al Gore in the White House, not Bush?
During the campaign, Bush touted himself as the MBA candidate who had
spent years in corporate boardrooms, although his success was more in
getting bailed out by his father's friends than in actually turning a
profit.
President Bush, who is wrongly called president held a poorly received
press conference on July 8 as he took on what he called corporate
"malfeeance." He followed that on July 9 with a lackluster speech on
corporate responsibility that drew attention to the hypocrisy of him
condemning insider loans and other practices that he himself enjoyed
during his business career.
Shalom,
---Prof. Leland Milton Goldblatt, Ph.D. ®
Reverend Chancellor Leland Milton Goldblatt Ph.D. ED.D. M.F.A, D.Div.
M.Theo .
Copyright © 2003
http://www.prof.faithweb.com
http://www.ivycollege.com
http://drgoldblatt.blogspot.com/
http://www.voxfux.com
http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/
http://www.bushflash.com/nazi.html
lelandmiltongoldblatt@yahoo.com
HAIL to the THIEF! Not my president. IMPEACH HE SUPREME COURT!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cd" |
|
| Title: Re: Waning Bush Support |
08 Dec 2003 06:34:17 AM |
|
|
Thank you Christian, your every reply to Roedy Green's original msg is the
very definition of 'spin'. You had'nt argued one point made by Roedy. Side
step it all. You're a goooood sock puppet republikkkan.... Murdoch's Fux
and Friends is training you well.
"Christian Williamson" <cdwilli@erols.com> wrote in message
news:3fd439b3$0$7593$afc38c87@...
Christian Williamson wrote:
Roedy Green wrote:
The Internet reflects the opinions of the most clued in. The rest
will become clued in by their friends when the campaign heats up. It
is sort of a bellweather the way the country is going.
Here's a post that demonstrates just how stupid Internet posters can be:
Ha Ha Ha Bush is a Idiot
look at this stupid religion he believes in
Open that book for morons called the Holy
Bible and take a look...
On Friday I, a staunch Repub, had dinner with a Bush-hater, a staunch
Dem and an African-American. After ridiculing Bush for holding a plastic
turkey during his trip to Iraq, she bowed her head to thank the Lord for
her food.
The poster, Bibliomaniac8 (you mean there are at least 7 more just like
you?), has no clue that African Americans are quite religious, while at
the same time AAs are staunch Dem supporters. Rather than recognize the
importance of the Christian religion to a vital constituency of the Dem
party, Bibliomaniac8 simply slaps Bush as an idiot for believing the
Bible.
Where is the "clued in" part of Bibliomaniac8's post?
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
