WAR FABLES
© Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled by
the pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that "march"
to help Saddam and the terrorists, yet ignore the 500,000 people
massacred by radical Muslims in the Sudan, ignore the increasing
amount of Iraqis being murdered by the Iranian backed terrorists,
and ignore the butchery and the murder radical Islam is
perpetrating on the entire world in general. Ignoring the evil
radical Islam is perpetrating on the world while "protesting"
America and Israel's defensive retaliations against the wanton
and murderous attacks by the terrorists is what proves
irrefutably those that "march" and "post" for "peace" are really
clandestinely supporting terrorism and unprovoked religious
genocide. It is high time to expose just some of the ridiculous
lies coming from these pro-terrorists:
The Iraqi People Are Resisting the Coalition Fable
In truth, based upon the last AP poll, 83% of all Iraqis do not
want a theocracy in their country. Considering that is precisely
what the Iranian backed terrorists like Zargowai and his ilk are
trying to shove down the throats of the Iraqi people with wanton
butchery and murder, it is clear the majority of the "Iraqi
People" are supporting their Government and they want the
terrorists out just as much as the US led coalition does. I
should also mention that for every Policeman or Iraqi Solider the
goons murder, ten are standing in line to take their fallen
comrade's place. So are the terrorists going to run out of
supplies and moron suicide bombers before Iraq runs out of loyal
citizens - you bet! It is just a matter of time. Moreover, if the
Shiites gain a majority in the new Iraqi Government that will not
produce a de facto theocracy like some of the TP's are trying to
claim. The reason is the approved Iraqi Constitution requires all
three Iraqi factions (the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds) to agree
before any major legislation can be passed - especially any
modification of the Iraqi Constitution. The terrorists and Bid
Laden are desperate to stop the election as they know once it
occurs the UN and all of its member nations will recognize the
new Iraqi Government. That means support will pour in from all
over the world against the terrorists. So the goons are desperate
to discredit or stop the forthcoming Iraqi elections. No doubt
they will be able to intimidate some Iraqis on election day, but
I am told the election may span months if necessary to allow all
Iraqis the opportunity to vote without any intimidation from any
source, including the US led coalition - and the UN observers
will be in Iraq to make sure that happens.
The War in Iraq is Not Justified Fable
In October 2001, our Congress voted unanimously to wage war on
all international terrorists and all those that aid or support
them. Contrary to what the TP's want people to believe, that
resolution of war was NOT restricted just to Al Qaeda. That
resolution of war included all terrorists and all those that aid
or support them. Saddam was not only aiding and supporting
terrorism outside of Iraq, but he was building his own terrorist
army in Iraq! We all have seen the film of the Saddam Fedayeen,
dressed in white Martyr uniforms replete with ski masks, AK -47's
and suicide belts full of explosives high stepping on parade for
Saddam. Those masked goons were not a "girl scout" troop folks.
The TP's want all to ignore the fact that Saddam was building his
own terrorist army and our resolution of war in October 2001
provided complete and unabridged authority for President Bush to
invade Iraq on that basis alone.
Moreover, UN Resolution 1441 called for any or all member nations
to "use all necessary means" to force Saddam to comply with the
provisions of resolution 1441. Saddam was in violation of
resolution 1441 in at least a dozen different ways even if he had
already sent his WMD out of Iraq.
Although the TP's will tell you "there is no evidence of Saddam
and Al Qaeda cooperatively launching attacks" the TP's like to
ignore the fact that our intelligence community has released
evidence of not less than seven high level meetings between
Saddam's intelligence officers and Al Qaeda operatives. So
although we do not possess any "smoking gun" (yet) connecting
Saddam and Al Qaeda with attacks on the free world, we must
wonder if there were no cooperative operations between Saddam's
regime and Al Qaeda then why did they meet together not less than
seven times? If they were not going to work together one meeting
would have sufficed. So what were they doing together those other
six meetings - baking cookies for Uday?
Saddam Never Possessed WMD
In 1998 the UN inspectors cataloged and tagged tons of WMD in
Iraq, and tagged proscribed missiles and Biological Weapon Labs
as well. So Saddam clearly possessed WMD as late as 1998 and what
he did with them will soon be revealed by some of Saddam's
cabinet. The CIA released hard evidence that right before the war
Saddam moved his WMD into Syria and Lebanon via ambulances and
other vehicles. We shall soon find out if that report is
corroborated by Teric Aziz - who is making a deal for his life
and will (has already) spill the beans on WMD.
President Bush Lied About Saddam's Threat Fable
One of the most hilarious and outright lies coming from the TP's
is the one that claims President Bush said we needed to liberate
Iraq because Saddam represented an imminent threat due to his
WMD. Nothing could be further from the truth. In truth, what
President Bush said precisely in his speech advocating the
removal of Saddam and the liberation of the Iraqi people, was
that "we want to remove Saddam *before* he becomes an imminent
threat." President Bush clearly said that Saddam WAS NOT an
imminent threat, but because of his history, and his building of
a terrorist army, and his support of terrorism outside of Iraq,
he would become an imminent threat to the free world if Saddam
was allowed to continue his normal course of policy. President
Bush did not want to wait for another 911-type attack or Mushroom
clouds to start to appear over US Cities before he removed a
sworn enemy, who, by the way, openly and publicly declared war on
the USA, Britain and Israel on December 27, 2000, just ten short
months prior to the 911 massacres and long before President Bush
finally took Congress's direction to remove Saddam from power.
(Congress originally approved the removal of Saddam by military
force in 1998 under Bill Clinton. The Iraqi Liberation Act was
passed by a Democrat Congress, YEARS before President Bush took
office - so much for those lies that President Bush had ulterior
motives to remove Saddam, or that the removal of Saddam was based
upon faulty intelligence. If the intelligence was faulty on Iraq,
it was faulty initially during the Clinton administration).
Iraq is a Quagmire Fable
Before the liberation of Iraq experts forecasted that we would
lose at least ten thousand dead soldiers just to take Baghdad
(upwards to 100,000 dead if Saddam used Chemical or Biological
weapons) and another 5000 dead soldiers *per month* just to hold
Iraq until new elections could be held. Instead, President Bush
liberated 50 million people, turned two hostile nations into
allies (Afghanistan and Iraq) and he did it all with fewer than
1500 KIA and accident casualties combined. In contrast, when the
Democrats were running the Vietnam war, they managed to lose much
more than 1500 dead *per week!* Not to mention all previous wars
in which such a small amount of expected casualties suffered was
hailed as a great victory. General Eisenhower, as an example, was
expected to lose 70% of his invading force during the Normandy
Invasion, but instead he only lost about 25%. His 25% casualties
were hailed by the allies and the American people as the greatest
victory ever in the history of modern warfare. But that
Eisenhower victory shrinks to mere insignificance compared to the
Bush accomplishments. So far, President Bush has achieved the
greatest military victories with the fewest casualties (both
military and civilian) than any other war, president, or general
in the history of war involving the United Sates. And that is
what the Bush detractors call a "Quagmire?"
Moreover, during each war there are setbacks and enemy victories.
When we were surprised by the Battle of the Bulge, did everyone
call for the resignation of General Eisenhower, or the
impeachment of President Roosevelt? When the Japanese killed
20,000 Americans when we tried to take a single Island, did
anyone say General MacArthur should resign and that our war in
the Pacific was a "Quagmire?" When the Chinese invaded North
Korea and sent our forces in full retreat, did anyone ask for
President Truman's resignation or demand that General MacArthur
be fired? When General Montgomery failed to take Cahn as
promised, or launched his infamous invasion failure in Holland
dubbed "Market Garden," did the Brits call his failures a
"Quagmire?" When President Lincoln suffered the defeat at
Fredericksburg, did the American people call for his resignation
and call the war of the rebellion a "Quagmire?" True American and
Brit patriots already know it is resolve that wins wars, and some
defeats are inevitable regardless of how many capable or
intelligent Generals we might have.
War is a work in progress. Its events are fluid, and the enemy
might do anything and will always attempt to do what is
unexpected. It is impossible to fight a defensive war and win.
When we defend without counter attacking we will automatically
lose the battle and eventually the war - we cannot circle our
HumVees and hide in compounds. There will always be setbacks and
surprises in war especially when we are on the offensive. No
General in history has been able to consult a crystal ball and
thereby know in advance which or what tactics the enemy is going
to use in the future. The TP's demand that Secretary Rumsfield
must know in advance what the enemy might or might not do or
perpetrate is utterly ridiculous. We must realize that all we can
hope to accomplish in war is to win more battles than we lose -
yes we will lose some battles, and losing battles and suffering
casualties is as much a part of war as is the slinking shadow of
utter brutality that follows war closely.
Voting Machines Were Rigged Fable
How do you rig a simple calculator? DUH! Voting machines are
simple calculators, when a red button is pushed as an example, a
vote is cast for the red side. When a blue button is pushed or a
blue lever is pulled, a vote is cast for the blue side. The
calculators are not programable outside of their prime functions,
not connected to the internet, and both Democrats and Republican
representatives collectively inspected each voting machine and
signed off on an inspection document certifying the machine
worked as represented. In many cases' hundreds of trial votes
were tested on each machine, and those that failed to record or
malfunctioned were taken off line and repaired. Moreover, unless
someone had a crystal ball and knew how many votes would be cast
for each candidate, it would be impossible to rig a calculator to
malfunction in anyone's favor. I should also mention that
hundreds of Congresspersons, Governors, and dozens of lesser
politicians were also elected from these very simple machines and
not one loser has contested the results in the entire nation!
Even John Kerry and the Democrats are not claiming any rigged
voting machines! Since none of those that are trying their best
to further the fable the voting machines were rigged can produce
even a single rigged machine, or explain how a simple calculator
can be rigged, only the drooling idiots of the world are stupid
enough to believe such obvious hype coming from the likes of
those that are just trying to find excuses for their failure to
muster enough votes to elect the traitor Hanoi John Kerry.
John Kerry Told the Truth in the Debates Fable
In truth, if you bother to check factscheck.org, *everything*
Kerry claimed and promised was a bald face lie! I cannot find a
single promise or statement made by Hanoi John Kerry that was
true. If you can find *any* truth Kerry told during the recent
campaign, please post it here and I will prove it was a lie.
President Bush is Stupid Fable
President Bush is a graduate from Yale and Harvard, and his
military IQ test produced a much higher score than John Kerry's
IQ score. Moreover, President Bush's IQ results scored in the top
5% of all that ever took those tests IN THE WORLD! Based upon
President Bush's IQ scores, apparently, President Bush is the
smartest President in our history (his test scores far exceed
Bill Clinton's, Carter's, Regan's and especially exceed by far
John Kennedy's). People do have a history of underestimating
President Bush, and that is just one of the reasons he keeps
winning.
Americans are Stupid Fable
Americans possess college degrees at a 3 to 1 margin over
Europeans. I lived in Europe for seven years and I assure you
that in general Americans are far more intelligent, creative,
ambitious and resourceful in comparison to Europeans. In fact
most Americans that have lived in Europe find many Europeans lazy
and quite misinformed about America and Americans. No wonder all
the smart Europeans, Asians and Africans send their sons and
daughters to American universities.
The Entire Muslim World will Rise Up Against America Fable
When President Bush invaded Afghanistan, the radical Muslim
clerics howled and screamed for "martyrs" to come forth and
commit suicide to kill Americans. The same howling occurred when
President Bush liberated Iraq. Yet all terrorists, including the
crazies that are willing to butcher themselves just to murder,
number only about 20,000 - and those numbers are dwindling fast
thanks to the US forces. In addition, radical Muslim clerics are
finally being arrested in their native lands for advocating
murder and sedition, and Madrases that teach "murder all
non-Muslims" are being shut down, and terrorist funding is
disappearing faster than a Palestinian leader's bank account.
What most that spins this fable do not want their readers to know
is even if millions of Muslims did rise up to fight against the
free world, who would feed or arm them? The only two rogue
nations left that are stupid enough to support radical Islam are
Iran and Syria, and they can barely feed their own populations,
not to mention support an army in the field for any length of
time, especially against a modern American Army. North Korea is
another example. North Korea is reported to have the third
largest standing Army in the world, but North Korea does not have
the food nor other supplies to support that Army in the field for
more than one single week! The USA on the other hand, under a
national emergency edict, could muster at least a 30 million man
Army, and not only feed them, but equip each soldier with state
of the art equipment and supplies. Simply put, Radical Islam does
not have a chance. It is just a matter of time before terrorism
as we know it is defeated.
Terrorist Armies Cannot Be Defeated Fable
In truth, history proves just the opposite is true! Even during
the American Revolution our militias lost every battle against
the British until General Von Stuben was hired by General
Washington to turn our rabble into a Regular Army. The Mexican
Bandits/Terrorists never won their revolution, the Bolo Bolo and
Huk terrorists lost their war, the Confederate Guerillas,
Quantrel and his ilk were destroyed or captured, the American
Indians lost all of their wars and they were perhaps the best
raiders or terrorists the world had ever seen at that time, the
Werewolves Nazi terrorists that continued to use Guerrilla
attacks on the allies after Nazi Germany surrendered were all
destroyed or captured, the Basque, IRA, and their ilk have never
accomplished their goals in the past 80 years of murder, the Viet
Cong, although 500,000 strong and supplied by the USSR were all
but annihilated after the 1968 Tet offensive by the US led allied
forces, the Mafia in the USA has been all but turned into the
Girl Scouts, etc . . . etc . . .
Without the complete and total backing of a super power Guerrilla
tactics are doomed to failure, and even with the backing of the
super power the Guerillas are only as successful as the resolve
of the Super Power to continue to support them.
Radical Islamist terrorists and those nations that aid or support
them are doomed - they are just too stupid to know it yet - but
you can be sure our Soldiers are and will convince them.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 12:38:39 PM |
|
|
DGVREIMAN wrote:
Ignoring the evil
radical Islam is perpetrating on the world while "protesting"
America and Israel's defensive retaliations against the wanton
and murderous attacks by the terrorists is what proves
irrefutably those that "march" and "post" for "peace" are really
clandestinely supporting terrorism and unprovoked religious
genocide.
Bull *****..Youre' with me or 'aggin me... the old Hatfiled and McCoy
fued all over again.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 09:39:47 PM |
|
|
WAR FABLES
© Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled by
the pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that "march"
to help Saddam and the terrorists, yet ignore the 500,000 people
massacred by radical Muslims in the Sudan, ignore the increasing
amount of Iraqis being murdered by the Iranian backed terrorists,
and ignore the butchery and the murder radical Islam is
perpetrating on the entire world in general. Ignoring the evil
radical Islam is perpetrating on the world while "protesting"
America and Israel's defensive retaliations against the wanton
and murderous attacks by the terrorists is what proves
irrefutably those that "march" and "post" for "peace" are really
clandestinely supporting terrorism and unprovoked religious
genocide. It is high time to expose just some of the ridiculous
lies coming from these pro-terrorists:
The Iraqi People Are Resisting the Coalition Fable
In truth, based upon the last AP poll, 83% of all Iraqis do not
want a theocracy in their country. Considering that is precisely
what the Iranian backed terrorists like Zargowai and his ilk are
trying to shove down the throats of the Iraqi people with wanton
butchery and murder, it is clear the majority of the "Iraqi
People" are supporting their Government and they want the
terrorists out just as much as the US led coalition does. I
should also mention that for every Policeman or Iraqi Solider the
goons murder, ten are standing in line to take their fallen
comrade's place. So are the terrorists going to run out of
supplies and moron suicide bombers before Iraq runs out of loyal
citizens - you bet! It is just a matter of time. Moreover, if the
Shiites gain a majority in the new Iraqi Government that will not
produce a de facto theocracy like some of the TP's are trying to
claim. The reason is the approved Iraqi Constitution requires all
three Iraqi factions (the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds) to agree
before any major legislation can be passed - especially any
modification of the Iraqi Constitution. The terrorists and Bid
Laden are desperate to stop the election as they know once it
occurs the UN and all of its member nations will recognize the
new Iraqi Government. That means support will pour in from all
over the world against the terrorists. So the goons are desperate
to discredit or stop the forthcoming Iraqi elections. No doubt
they will be able to intimidate some Iraqis on election day, but
I am told the election may span months if necessary to allow all
Iraqis the opportunity to vote without any intimidation from any
source, including the US led coalition - and the UN observers
will be in Iraq to make sure that happens.
The War in Iraq is Not Justified Fable
In October 2001, our Congress voted unanimously to wage war on
all international terrorists and all those that aid or support
them. Contrary to what the TP's want people to believe, that
resolution of war was NOT restricted just to Al Qaeda. That
resolution of war included all terrorists and all those that aid
or support them. Saddam was not only aiding and supporting
terrorism outside of Iraq, but he was building his own terrorist
army in Iraq! We all have seen the film of the Saddam Fedayeen,
dressed in white Martyr uniforms replete with ski masks, AK -47's
and suicide belts full of explosives high stepping on parade for
Saddam. Those masked goons were not a "girl scout" troop folks.
The TP's want all to ignore the fact that Saddam was building his
own terrorist army and our resolution of war in October 2001
provided complete and unabridged authority for President Bush to
invade Iraq on that basis alone.
Moreover, UN Resolution 1441 called for any or all member nations
to "use all necessary means" to force Saddam to comply with the
provisions of resolution 1441. Saddam was in violation of
resolution 1441 in at least a dozen different ways even if he had
already sent his WMD out of Iraq.
Although the TP's will tell you "there is no evidence of Saddam
and Al Qaeda cooperatively launching attacks" the TP's like to
ignore the fact that our intelligence community has released
evidence of not less than seven high level meetings between
Saddam's intelligence officers and Al Qaeda operatives. So
although we do not possess any "smoking gun" (yet) connecting
Saddam and Al Qaeda with attacks on the free world, we must
wonder if there were no cooperative operations between Saddam's
regime and Al Qaeda then why did they meet together not less than
seven times? If they were not going to work together one meeting
would have sufficed. So what were they doing together those other
six meetings - baking cookies for Uday?
Saddam Never Possessed WMD
In 1998 the UN inspectors cataloged and tagged tons of WMD in
Iraq, and tagged proscribed missiles and Biological Weapon Labs
as well. So Saddam clearly possessed WMD as late as 1998 and what
he did with them will soon be revealed by some of Saddam's
cabinet. The CIA released hard evidence that right before the war
Saddam moved his WMD into Syria and Lebanon via ambulances and
other vehicles. We shall soon find out if that report is
corroborated by Teric Aziz - who is making a deal for his life
and will (has already) spill the beans on WMD.
President Bush Lied About Saddam's Threat Fable
One of the most hilarious and outright lies coming from the TP's
is the one that claims President Bush said we needed to liberate
Iraq because Saddam represented an imminent threat due to his
WMD. Nothing could be further from the truth. In truth, what
President Bush said precisely in his speech advocating the
removal of Saddam and the liberation of the Iraqi people, was
that "we want to remove Saddam *before* he becomes an imminent
threat." President Bush clearly said that Saddam WAS NOT an
imminent threat, but because of his history, and his building of
a terrorist army, and his support of terrorism outside of Iraq,
he would become an imminent threat to the free world if Saddam
was allowed to continue his normal course of policy. President
Bush did not want to wait for another 911-type attack or Mushroom
clouds to start to appear over US Cities before he removed a
sworn enemy, who, by the way, openly and publicly declared war on
the USA, Britain and Israel on December 27, 2000, just ten short
months prior to the 911 massacres and long before President Bush
finally took Congress's direction to remove Saddam from power.
(Congress originally approved the removal of Saddam by military
force in 1998 under Bill Clinton. The Iraqi Liberation Act was
passed by a Democrat Congress, YEARS before President Bush took
office - so much for those lies that President Bush had ulterior
motives to remove Saddam, or that the removal of Saddam was based
upon faulty intelligence. If the intelligence was faulty on Iraq,
it was faulty initially during the Clinton administration).
Iraq is a Quagmire Fable
Before the liberation of Iraq experts forecasted that we would
lose at least ten thousand dead soldiers just to take Baghdad
(upwards to 100,000 dead if Saddam used Chemical or Biological
weapons) and another 5000 dead soldiers *per month* just to hold
Iraq until new elections could be held. Instead, President Bush
liberated 50 million people, turned two hostile nations into
allies (Afghanistan and Iraq) and he did it all with fewer than
1500 KIA and accident casualties combined. In contrast, when the
Democrats were running the Vietnam war, they managed to lose much
more than 1500 dead *per week!* Not to mention all previous wars
in which such a small amount of expected casualties suffered was
hailed as a great victory. General Eisenhower, as an example, was
expected to lose 70% of his invading force during the Normandy
Invasion, but instead he only lost about 25%. His 25% casualties
were hailed by the allies and the American people as the greatest
victory ever in the history of modern warfare. But that
Eisenhower victory shrinks to mere insignificance compared to the
Bush accomplishments. So far, President Bush has achieved the
greatest military victories with the fewest casualties (both
military and civilian) than any other war, president, or general
in the history of war involving the United Sates. And that is
what the Bush detractors call a "Quagmire?"
Moreover, during each war there are setbacks and enemy victories.
When we were surprised by the Battle of the Bulge, did everyone
call for the resignation of General Eisenhower, or the
impeachment of President Roosevelt? When the Japanese killed
20,000 Americans when we tried to take a single Island, did
anyone say General MacArthur should resign and that our war in
the Pacific was a "Quagmire?" When the Chinese invaded North
Korea and sent our forces in full retreat, did anyone ask for
President Truman's resignation or demand that General MacArthur
be fired? When General Montgomery failed to take Cahn as
promised, or launched his infamous invasion failure in Holland
dubbed "Market Garden," did the Brits call his failures a
"Quagmire?" When President Lincoln suffered the defeat at
Fredericksburg, did the American people call for his resignation
and call the war of the rebellion a "Quagmire?" True American and
Brit patriots already know it is resolve that wins wars, and some
defeats are inevitable regardless of how many capable or
intelligent Generals we might have.
War is a work in progress. Its events are fluid, and the enemy
might do anything and will always attempt to do what is
unexpected. It is impossible to fight a defensive war and win.
When we defend without counter attacking we will automatically
lose the battle and eventually the war - we cannot circle our
HumVees and hide in compounds. There will always be setbacks and
surprises in war especially when we are on the offensive. No
General in history has been able to consult a crystal ball and
thereby know in advance which or what tactics the enemy is going
to use in the future. The TP's demand that Secretary Rumsfield
must know in advance what the enemy might or might not do or
perpetrate is utterly ridiculous. We must realize that all we can
hope to accomplish in war is to win more battles than we lose -
yes we will lose some battles, and losing battles and suffering
casualties is as much a part of war as is the slinking shadow of
utter brutality that follows war closely.
Voting Machines Were Rigged Fable
How do you rig a simple calculator? DUH! Voting machines are
simple calculators, when a red button is pushed as an example, a
vote is cast for the red side. When a blue button is pushed or a
blue lever is pulled, a vote is cast for the blue side. The
calculators are not programable outside of their prime functions,
not connected to the internet, and both Democrats and Republican
representatives collectively inspected each voting machine and
signed off on an inspection document certifying the machine
worked as represented. In many cases' hundreds of trial votes
were tested on each machine, and those that failed to record or
malfunctioned were taken off line and repaired. Moreover, unless
someone had a crystal ball and knew how many votes would be cast
for each candidate, it would be impossible to rig a calculator to
malfunction in anyone's favor. I should also mention that
hundreds of Congresspersons, Governors, and dozens of lesser
politicians were also elected from these very simple machines and
not one loser has contested the results in the entire nation!
Even John Kerry and the Democrats are not claiming any rigged
voting machines! Since none of those that are trying their best
to further the fable the voting machines were rigged can produce
even a single rigged machine, or explain how a simple calculator
can be rigged, only the drooling idiots of the world are stupid
enough to believe such obvious hype coming from the likes of
those that are just trying to find excuses for their failure to
muster enough votes to elect the traitor Hanoi John Kerry.
John Kerry Told the Truth in the Debates Fable
In truth, if you bother to check factscheck.org, *everything*
Kerry claimed and promised was a bald face lie! I cannot find a
single promise or statement made by Hanoi John Kerry that was
true. If you can find *any* truth Kerry told during the recent
campaign, please post it here and I will prove it was a lie.
President Bush is Stupid Fable
President Bush is a graduate from Yale and Harvard, and his
military IQ test produced a much higher score than John Kerry's
IQ score. Moreover, President Bush's IQ results scored in the top
5% of all that ever took those tests IN THE WORLD! Based upon
President Bush's IQ scores, apparently, President Bush is the
smartest President in our history (his test scores far exceed
Bill Clinton's, Carter's, Regan's and especially exceed by far
John Kennedy's). People do have a history of underestimating
President Bush, and that is just one of the reasons he keeps
winning.
Americans are Stupid Fable
Americans possess college degrees at a 3 to 1 margin over
Europeans. I lived in Europe for seven years and I assure you
that in general Americans are far more intelligent, creative,
ambitious and resourceful in comparison to Europeans. In fact
most Americans that have lived in Europe find many Europeans lazy
and quite misinformed about America and Americans. No wonder all
the smart Europeans, Asians and Africans send their sons and
daughters to American universities.
The Entire Muslim World will Rise Up Against America Fable
When President Bush invaded Afghanistan, the radical Muslim
clerics howled and screamed for "martyrs" to come forth and
commit suicide to kill Americans. The same howling occurred when
President Bush liberated Iraq. Yet all terrorists, including the
crazies that are willing to butcher themselves just to murder,
number only about 20,000 - and those numbers are dwindling fast
thanks to the US forces. In addition, radical Muslim clerics are
finally being arrested in their native lands for advocating
murder and sedition, and Madrases that teach "murder all
non-Muslims" are being shut down, and terrorist funding is
disappearing faster than a Palestinian leader's bank account.
What most that spins this fable do not want their readers to know
is even if millions of Muslims did rise up to fight against the
free world, who would feed or arm them? The only two rogue
nations left that are stupid enough to support radical Islam are
Iran and Syria, and they can barely feed their own populations,
not to mention support an army in the field for any length of
time, especially against a modern American Army. North Korea is
another example. North Korea is reported to have the third
largest standing Army in the world, but North Korea does not have
the food nor other supplies to support that Army in the field for
more than one single week! The USA on the other hand, under a
national emergency edict, could muster at least a 30 million man
Army, and not only feed them, but equip each soldier with state
of the art equipment and supplies. Simply put, Radical Islam does
not have a chance. It is just a matter of time before terrorism
as we know it is defeated.
Terrorist Armies Cannot Be Defeated Fable
In truth, history proves just the opposite is true! Even during
the American Revolution our militias lost every battle against
the British until General Von Stuben was hired by General
Washington to turn our rabble into a Regular Army. The Mexican
Bandits/Terrorists never won their revolution, the Bolo Bolo and
Huk terrorists lost their war, the Confederate Guerillas,
Quantrel and his ilk were destroyed or captured, the American
Indians lost all of their wars and they were perhaps the best
raiders or terrorists the world had ever seen at that time, the
Werewolves Nazi terrorists that continued to use Guerrilla
attacks on the allies after Nazi Germany surrendered were all
destroyed or captured, the Basque, IRA, and their ilk have never
accomplished their goals in the past 80 years of murder, the Viet
Cong, although 500,000 strong and supplied by the USSR were all
but annihilated after the 1968 Tet offensive by the US led allied
forces, the Mafia in the USA has been all but turned into the
Girl Scouts, etc . . . etc . . .
Without the complete and total backing of a super power Guerrilla
tactics are doomed to failure, and even with the backing of the
super power the Guerillas are only as successful as the resolve
of the Super Power to continue to support them.
Radical Islamist terrorists and those nations that aid or support
them are doomed - they are just too stupid to know it yet - but
you can be sure our Soldiers are and will convince them.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Danzig" <tyatcak@telus.net> wrote in message
news:PQCAd.28877$KO5.19848@clgrps13...
DGVREIMAN wrote:
Ignoring the evil radical Islam is perpetrating on the world
while "protesting" America and Israel's defensive retaliations
against the wanton and murderous attacks by the terrorists is
what proves irrefutably those that "march" and "post" for
"peace" are really clandestinely supporting terrorism and
unprovoked religious genocide.
Bull *****..Youre' with me or 'aggin me... the old Hatfiled and
McCoy fued all over again.
Doug says: Read above, if protesters are really against war they
would be against all war, not just against defensive wars
launched by America and Israel.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 09:52:32 PM |
|
|
Doug says: Read above, if protesters are really against war they
would be against all war, not just against defensive wars
launched by America and Israel.
Doug Grant (Tm)
defensive wars???what a bundle of horse manure that is!
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 10:21:34 PM |
|
|
WAR FABLES
© Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled by
the pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that "march"
to help Saddam and the terrorists, yet ignore the 500,000 people
massacred by radical Muslims in the Sudan, ignore the increasing
amount of Iraqis being murdered by the Iranian backed terrorists,
and ignore the butchery and the murder radical Islam is
perpetrating on the entire world in general. Ignoring the evil
radical Islam is perpetrating on the world while "protesting"
America and Israel's defensive retaliations against the wanton
and murderous attacks by the terrorists is what proves
irrefutably those that "march" and "post" for "peace" are really
clandestinely supporting terrorism and unprovoked religious
genocide. It is high time to expose just some of the ridiculous
lies coming from these pro-terrorists:
The Iraqi People Are Resisting the Coalition Fable
In truth, based upon the last AP poll, 83% of all Iraqis do not
want a theocracy in their country. Considering that is precisely
what the Iranian backed terrorists like Zargowai and his ilk are
trying to shove down the throats of the Iraqi people with wanton
butchery and murder, it is clear the majority of the "Iraqi
People" are supporting their Government and they want the
terrorists out just as much as the US led coalition does. I
should also mention that for every Policeman or Iraqi Solider the
goons murder, ten are standing in line to take their fallen
comrade's place. So are the terrorists going to run out of
supplies and moron suicide bombers before Iraq runs out of loyal
citizens - you bet! It is just a matter of time. Moreover, if the
Shiites gain a majority in the new Iraqi Government that will not
produce a de facto theocracy like some of the TP's are trying to
claim. The reason is the approved Iraqi Constitution requires all
three Iraqi factions (the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds) to agree
before any major legislation can be passed - especially any
modification of the Iraqi Constitution. The terrorists and Bid
Laden are desperate to stop the election as they know once it
occurs the UN and all of its member nations will recognize the
new Iraqi Government. That means support will pour in from all
over the world against the terrorists. So the goons are desperate
to discredit or stop the forthcoming Iraqi elections. No doubt
they will be able to intimidate some Iraqis on election day, but
I am told the election may span months if necessary to allow all
Iraqis the opportunity to vote without any intimidation from any
source, including the US led coalition - and the UN observers
will be in Iraq to make sure that happens.
The War in Iraq is Not Justified Fable
In October 2001, our Congress voted unanimously to wage war on
all international terrorists and all those that aid or support
them. Contrary to what the TP's want people to believe, that
resolution of war was NOT restricted just to Al Qaeda. That
resolution of war included all terrorists and all those that aid
or support them. Saddam was not only aiding and supporting
terrorism outside of Iraq, but he was building his own terrorist
army in Iraq! We all have seen the film of the Saddam Fedayeen,
dressed in white Martyr uniforms replete with ski masks, AK -47's
and suicide belts full of explosives high stepping on parade for
Saddam. Those masked goons were not a "girl scout" troop folks.
The TP's want all to ignore the fact that Saddam was building his
own terrorist army and our resolution of war in October 2001
provided complete and unabridged authority for President Bush to
invade Iraq on that basis alone.
Moreover, UN Resolution 1441 called for any or all member nations
to "use all necessary means" to force Saddam to comply with the
provisions of resolution 1441. Saddam was in violation of
resolution 1441 in at least a dozen different ways even if he had
already sent his WMD out of Iraq.
Although the TP's will tell you "there is no evidence of Saddam
and Al Qaeda cooperatively launching attacks" the TP's like to
ignore the fact that our intelligence community has released
evidence of not less than seven high level meetings between
Saddam's intelligence officers and Al Qaeda operatives. So
although we do not possess any "smoking gun" (yet) connecting
Saddam and Al Qaeda with attacks on the free world, we must
wonder if there were no cooperative operations between Saddam's
regime and Al Qaeda then why did they meet together not less than
seven times? If they were not going to work together one meeting
would have sufficed. So what were they doing together those other
six meetings - baking cookies for Uday?
Saddam Never Possessed WMD
In 1998 the UN inspectors cataloged and tagged tons of WMD in
Iraq, and tagged proscribed missiles and Biological Weapon Labs
as well. So Saddam clearly possessed WMD as late as 1998 and what
he did with them will soon be revealed by some of Saddam's
cabinet. The CIA released hard evidence that right before the war
Saddam moved his WMD into Syria and Lebanon via ambulances and
other vehicles. We shall soon find out if that report is
corroborated by Teric Aziz - who is making a deal for his life
and will (has already) spill the beans on WMD.
President Bush Lied About Saddam's Threat Fable
One of the most hilarious and outright lies coming from the TP's
is the one that claims President Bush said we needed to liberate
Iraq because Saddam represented an imminent threat due to his
WMD. Nothing could be further from the truth. In truth, what
President Bush said precisely in his speech advocating the
removal of Saddam and the liberation of the Iraqi people, was
that "we want to remove Saddam *before* he becomes an imminent
threat." President Bush clearly said that Saddam WAS NOT an
imminent threat, but because of his history, and his building of
a terrorist army, and his support of terrorism outside of Iraq,
he would become an imminent threat to the free world if Saddam
was allowed to continue his normal course of policy. President
Bush did not want to wait for another 911-type attack or Mushroom
clouds to start to appear over US Cities before he removed a
sworn enemy, who, by the way, openly and publicly declared war on
the USA, Britain and Israel on December 27, 2000, just ten short
months prior to the 911 massacres and long before President Bush
finally took Congress's direction to remove Saddam from power.
(Congress originally approved the removal of Saddam by military
force in 1998 under Bill Clinton. The Iraqi Liberation Act was
passed by a Democrat Congress, YEARS before President Bush took
office - so much for those lies that President Bush had ulterior
motives to remove Saddam, or that the removal of Saddam was based
upon faulty intelligence. If the intelligence was faulty on Iraq,
it was faulty initially during the Clinton administration).
Iraq is a Quagmire Fable
Before the liberation of Iraq experts forecasted that we would
lose at least ten thousand dead soldiers just to take Baghdad
(upwards to 100,000 dead if Saddam used Chemical or Biological
weapons) and another 5000 dead soldiers *per month* just to hold
Iraq until new elections could be held. Instead, President Bush
liberated 50 million people, turned two hostile nations into
allies (Afghanistan and Iraq) and he did it all with fewer than
1500 KIA and accident casualties combined. In contrast, when the
Democrats were running the Vietnam war, they managed to lose much
more than 1500 dead *per week!* Not to mention all previous wars
in which such a small amount of expected casualties suffered was
hailed as a great victory. General Eisenhower, as an example, was
expected to lose 70% of his invading force during the Normandy
Invasion, but instead he only lost about 25%. His 25% casualties
were hailed by the allies and the American people as the greatest
victory ever in the history of modern warfare. But that
Eisenhower victory shrinks to mere insignificance compared to the
Bush accomplishments. So far, President Bush has achieved the
greatest military victories with the fewest casualties (both
military and civilian) than any other war, president, or general
in the history of war involving the United Sates. And that is
what the Bush detractors call a "Quagmire?"
Moreover, during each war there are setbacks and enemy victories.
When we were surprised by the Battle of the Bulge, did everyone
call for the resignation of General Eisenhower, or the
impeachment of President Roosevelt? When the Japanese killed
20,000 Americans when we tried to take a single Island, did
anyone say General MacArthur should resign and that our war in
the Pacific was a "Quagmire?" When the Chinese invaded North
Korea and sent our forces in full retreat, did anyone ask for
President Truman's resignation or demand that General MacArthur
be fired? When General Montgomery failed to take Cahn as
promised, or launched his infamous invasion failure in Holland
dubbed "Market Garden," did the Brits call his failures a
"Quagmire?" When President Lincoln suffered the defeat at
Fredericksburg, did the American people call for his resignation
and call the war of the rebellion a "Quagmire?" True American and
Brit patriots already know it is resolve that wins wars, and some
defeats are inevitable regardless of how many capable or
intelligent Generals we might have.
War is a work in progress. Its events are fluid, and the enemy
might do anything and will always attempt to do what is
unexpected. It is impossible to fight a defensive war and win.
When we defend without counter attacking we will automatically
lose the battle and eventually the war - we cannot circle our
HumVees and hide in compounds. There will always be setbacks and
surprises in war especially when we are on the offensive. No
General in history has been able to consult a crystal ball and
thereby know in advance which or what tactics the enemy is going
to use in the future. The TP's demand that Secretary Rumsfield
must know in advance what the enemy might or might not do or
perpetrate is utterly ridiculous. We must realize that all we can
hope to accomplish in war is to win more battles than we lose -
yes we will lose some battles, and losing battles and suffering
casualties is as much a part of war as is the slinking shadow of
utter brutality that follows war closely.
Voting Machines Were Rigged Fable
How do you rig a simple calculator? DUH! Voting machines are
simple calculators, when a red button is pushed as an example, a
vote is cast for the red side. When a blue button is pushed or a
blue lever is pulled, a vote is cast for the blue side. The
calculators are not programable outside of their prime functions,
not connected to the internet, and both Democrats and Republican
representatives collectively inspected each voting machine and
signed off on an inspection document certifying the machine
worked as represented. In many cases' hundreds of trial votes
were tested on each machine, and those that failed to record or
malfunctioned were taken off line and repaired. Moreover, unless
someone had a crystal ball and knew how many votes would be cast
for each candidate, it would be impossible to rig a calculator to
malfunction in anyone's favor. I should also mention that
hundreds of Congresspersons, Governors, and dozens of lesser
politicians were also elected from these very simple machines and
not one loser has contested the results in the entire nation!
Even John Kerry and the Democrats are not claiming any rigged
voting machines! Since none of those that are trying their best
to further the fable the voting machines were rigged can produce
even a single rigged machine, or explain how a simple calculator
can be rigged, only the drooling idiots of the world are stupid
enough to believe such obvious hype coming from the likes of
those that are just trying to find excuses for their failure to
muster enough votes to elect the traitor Hanoi John Kerry.
John Kerry Told the Truth in the Debates Fable
In truth, if you bother to check factscheck.org, *everything*
Kerry claimed and promised was a bald face lie! I cannot find a
single promise or statement made by Hanoi John Kerry that was
true. If you can find *any* truth Kerry told during the recent
campaign, please post it here and I will prove it was a lie.
President Bush is Stupid Fable
President Bush is a graduate from Yale and Harvard, and his
military IQ test produced a much higher score than John Kerry's
IQ score. Moreover, President Bush's IQ results scored in the top
5% of all that ever took those tests IN THE WORLD! Based upon
President Bush's IQ scores, apparently, President Bush is the
smartest President in our history (his test scores far exceed
Bill Clinton's, Carter's, Regan's and especially exceed by far
John Kennedy's). People do have a history of underestimating
President Bush, and that is just one of the reasons he keeps
winning.
Americans are Stupid Fable
Americans possess college degrees at a 3 to 1 margin over
Europeans. I lived in Europe for seven years and I assure you
that in general Americans are far more intelligent, creative,
ambitious and resourceful in comparison to Europeans. In fact
most Americans that have lived in Europe find many Europeans lazy
and quite misinformed about America and Americans. No wonder all
the smart Europeans, Asians and Africans send their sons and
daughters to American universities.
The Entire Muslim World will Rise Up Against America Fable
When President Bush invaded Afghanistan, the radical Muslim
clerics howled and screamed for "martyrs" to come forth and
commit suicide to kill Americans. The same howling occurred when
President Bush liberated Iraq. Yet all terrorists, including the
crazies that are willing to butcher themselves just to murder,
number only about 20,000 - and those numbers are dwindling fast
thanks to the US forces. In addition, radical Muslim clerics are
finally being arrested in their native lands for advocating
murder and sedition, and Madrases that teach "murder all
non-Muslims" are being shut down, and terrorist funding is
disappearing faster than a Palestinian leader's bank account.
What most that spins this fable do not want their readers to know
is even if millions of Muslims did rise up to fight against the
free world, who would feed or arm them? The only two rogue
nations left that are stupid enough to support radical Islam are
Iran and Syria, and they can barely feed their own populations,
not to mention support an army in the field for any length of
time, especially against a modern American Army. North Korea is
another example. North Korea is reported to have the third
largest standing Army in the world, but North Korea does not have
the food nor other supplies to support that Army in the field for
more than one single week! The USA on the other hand, under a
national emergency edict, could muster at least a 30 million man
Army, and not only feed them, but equip each soldier with state
of the art equipment and supplies. Simply put, Radical Islam does
not have a chance. It is just a matter of time before terrorism
as we know it is defeated.
Terrorist Armies Cannot Be Defeated Fable
In truth, history proves just the opposite is true! Even during
the American Revolution our militias lost every battle against
the British until General Von Stuben was hired by General
Washington to turn our rabble into a Regular Army. The Mexican
Bandits/Terrorists never won their revolution, the Bolo Bolo and
Huk terrorists lost their war, the Confederate Guerillas,
Quantrel and his ilk were destroyed or captured, the American
Indians lost all of their wars and they were perhaps the best
raiders or terrorists the world had ever seen at that time, the
Werewolves Nazi terrorists that continued to use Guerrilla
attacks on the allies after Nazi Germany surrendered were all
destroyed or captured, the Basque, IRA, and their ilk have never
accomplished their goals in the past 80 years of murder, the Viet
Cong, although 500,000 strong and supplied by the USSR were all
but annihilated after the 1968 Tet offensive by the US led allied
forces, the Mafia in the USA has been all but turned into the
Girl Scouts, etc . . . etc . . .
Without the complete and total backing of a super power Guerrilla
tactics are doomed to failure, and even with the backing of the
super power the Guerillas are only as successful as the resolve
of the Super Power to continue to support them.
Radical Islamist terrorists and those nations that aid or support
them are doomed - they are just too stupid to know it yet - but
you can be sure our Soldiers are and will convince them.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Danzig" <tyatcak@telus.net> wrote in message
news:4YKAd.25398$Y72.10411@edtnps91...
Doug says: Read above, if protesters are really against war
they would be against all war, not just against defensive wars
launched by America and Israel.
Doug Grant (Tm)
defensive wars???what a bundle of horse manure that is!
Doug Says: Perhaps you have not heard, the goons attacked
America and its interests not less than ten times before we
retaliated - Israel was attacked by the Arab nations not less
than five times in a full scale war, and suffered its citizens
wantonly murdered for decades before it finally started to fight
back.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 11:12:59 PM |
|
|
Doug Says: Perhaps you have not heard, the goons attacked
America and its interests not less than ten times before we
retaliated - Israel was attacked by the Arab nations not less
than five times in a full scale war, and suffered its citizens
wantonly murdered for decades before it finally started to fight
back.
Saudi Arabians directed from Afghanistan attacked the U.S.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
31 Dec 2004 02:40:42 PM |
|
|
"Danzig" <tyatcak@telus.net> wrote in message
news:v7MAd.25884$Y72.21493@edtnps91...
Doug Says: Perhaps you have not heard, the goons attacked
America and its interests not less than ten times before we
retaliated - Israel was attacked by the Arab nations not less
than five times in a full scale war, and suffered its citizens
wantonly murdered for decades before it finally started to
fight back.
Saudi Arabians directed from Afghanistan attacked the U.S.
Doug Says: Please Danzig, the Saudi Government was not involved
in attacking the USA - no more than the Jordanian Government is
involved with the Jordanian goon Zargowi. Where a terrorist was
born has nothing to do with his acts of terrorism. DUH!
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
31 Dec 2004 05:43:18 PM |
|
|
D
Doug Says: Perhaps you have not heard, the goons attacked
America and its interests not less than ten times before we
retaliated - Israel was attacked by the Arab nations not less
than five times in a full scale war, and suffered its citizens
wantonly murdered for decades before it finally started to
fight back.
Saudi Arabians directed from Afghanistan attacked the U.S.
Doug Says: Please Danzig, the Saudi Government was not involved
in attacking the USA - no more than the Jordanian Government is
involved with the Jordanian goon Zargowi. Where a terrorist was
born has nothing to do with his acts of terrorism. DUH!
Doug Grant (Tm)
NIETHER WAS IRAQ..never said theri government was just that is where the
folks were from!
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
01 Jan 2005 11:15:10 AM |
|
|
"Danzig" <tyatcak@telus.net> wrote in message
news:qulBd.36170$KO5.7378@clgrps13...
D
Doug Says: Perhaps you have not heard, the goons attacked
America and its interests not less than ten times before we
retaliated - Israel was attacked by the Arab nations not less
than five times in a full scale war, and suffered its
citizens wantonly murdered for decades before it finally
started to fight back.
Saudi Arabians directed from Afghanistan attacked the U.S.
Doug Says: Please Danzig, the Saudi Government was not
involved in attacking the USA - no more than the Jordanian
Government is involved with the Jordanian goon Zargowi. Where
a terrorist was born has nothing to do with his acts of
terrorism. DUH!
Doug Grant (Tm)
NIETHER WAS IRAQ..never said theri government was just that is
where the folks were from!
Doug Says: Saddam was building his own terrorist Army, and we
have all seen it on film parading for Saddam. Our Congress
declared war on all international terrorists and all those that
aid or harbor them - Saddam fit that description to a tee.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "NotHimAgain" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 09:57:09 PM |
|
|
There are "just wars" and there are "unjust" wars. There's a big difference
between them.
"DGVREIMAN" <DGVREIMAN@COMCAST.NET> wrote in message
news:c-udnZcwK4kd5U7cRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
WAR FABLES
© Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled by
the pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that "march"
to help Saddam and the terrorists, yet ignore the 500,000 people
massacred by radical Muslims in the Sudan, ignore the increasing
amount of Iraqis being murdered by the Iranian backed terrorists,
and ignore the butchery and the murder radical Islam is
perpetrating on the entire world in general. Ignoring the evil
radical Islam is perpetrating on the world while "protesting"
America and Israel's defensive retaliations against the wanton
and murderous attacks by the terrorists is what proves
irrefutably those that "march" and "post" for "peace" are really
clandestinely supporting terrorism and unprovoked religious
genocide. It is high time to expose just some of the ridiculous
lies coming from these pro-terrorists:
The Iraqi People Are Resisting the Coalition Fable
In truth, based upon the last AP poll, 83% of all Iraqis do not
want a theocracy in their country. Considering that is precisely
what the Iranian backed terrorists like Zargowai and his ilk are
trying to shove down the throats of the Iraqi people with wanton
butchery and murder, it is clear the majority of the "Iraqi
People" are supporting their Government and they want the
terrorists out just as much as the US led coalition does. I
should also mention that for every Policeman or Iraqi Solider the
goons murder, ten are standing in line to take their fallen
comrade's place. So are the terrorists going to run out of
supplies and moron suicide bombers before Iraq runs out of loyal
citizens - you bet! It is just a matter of time. Moreover, if the
Shiites gain a majority in the new Iraqi Government that will not
produce a de facto theocracy like some of the TP's are trying to
claim. The reason is the approved Iraqi Constitution requires all
three Iraqi factions (the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds) to agree
before any major legislation can be passed - especially any
modification of the Iraqi Constitution. The terrorists and Bid
Laden are desperate to stop the election as they know once it
occurs the UN and all of its member nations will recognize the
new Iraqi Government. That means support will pour in from all
over the world against the terrorists. So the goons are desperate
to discredit or stop the forthcoming Iraqi elections. No doubt
they will be able to intimidate some Iraqis on election day, but
I am told the election may span months if necessary to allow all
Iraqis the opportunity to vote without any intimidation from any
source, including the US led coalition - and the UN observers
will be in Iraq to make sure that happens.
The War in Iraq is Not Justified Fable
In October 2001, our Congress voted unanimously to wage war on
all international terrorists and all those that aid or support
them. Contrary to what the TP's want people to believe, that
resolution of war was NOT restricted just to Al Qaeda. That
resolution of war included all terrorists and all those that aid
or support them. Saddam was not only aiding and supporting
terrorism outside of Iraq, but he was building his own terrorist
army in Iraq! We all have seen the film of the Saddam Fedayeen,
dressed in white Martyr uniforms replete with ski masks, AK -47's
and suicide belts full of explosives high stepping on parade for
Saddam. Those masked goons were not a "girl scout" troop folks.
The TP's want all to ignore the fact that Saddam was building his
own terrorist army and our resolution of war in October 2001
provided complete and unabridged authority for President Bush to
invade Iraq on that basis alone.
Moreover, UN Resolution 1441 called for any or all member nations
to "use all necessary means" to force Saddam to comply with the
provisions of resolution 1441. Saddam was in violation of
resolution 1441 in at least a dozen different ways even if he had
already sent his WMD out of Iraq.
Although the TP's will tell you "there is no evidence of Saddam
and Al Qaeda cooperatively launching attacks" the TP's like to
ignore the fact that our intelligence community has released
evidence of not less than seven high level meetings between
Saddam's intelligence officers and Al Qaeda operatives. So
although we do not possess any "smoking gun" (yet) connecting
Saddam and Al Qaeda with attacks on the free world, we must
wonder if there were no cooperative operations between Saddam's
regime and Al Qaeda then why did they meet together not less than
seven times? If they were not going to work together one meeting
would have sufficed. So what were they doing together those other
six meetings - baking cookies for Uday?
Saddam Never Possessed WMD
In 1998 the UN inspectors cataloged and tagged tons of WMD in
Iraq, and tagged proscribed missiles and Biological Weapon Labs
as well. So Saddam clearly possessed WMD as late as 1998 and what
he did with them will soon be revealed by some of Saddam's
cabinet. The CIA released hard evidence that right before the war
Saddam moved his WMD into Syria and Lebanon via ambulances and
other vehicles. We shall soon find out if that report is
corroborated by Teric Aziz - who is making a deal for his life
and will (has already) spill the beans on WMD.
President Bush Lied About Saddam's Threat Fable
One of the most hilarious and outright lies coming from the TP's
is the one that claims President Bush said we needed to liberate
Iraq because Saddam represented an imminent threat due to his
WMD. Nothing could be further from the truth. In truth, what
President Bush said precisely in his speech advocating the
removal of Saddam and the liberation of the Iraqi people, was
that "we want to remove Saddam *before* he becomes an imminent
threat." President Bush clearly said that Saddam WAS NOT an
imminent threat, but because of his history, and his building of
a terrorist army, and his support of terrorism outside of Iraq,
he would become an imminent threat to the free world if Saddam
was allowed to continue his normal course of policy. President
Bush did not want to wait for another 911-type attack or Mushroom
clouds to start to appear over US Cities before he removed a
sworn enemy, who, by the way, openly and publicly declared war on
the USA, Britain and Israel on December 27, 2000, just ten short
months prior to the 911 massacres and long before President Bush
finally took Congress's direction to remove Saddam from power.
(Congress originally approved the removal of Saddam by military
force in 1998 under Bill Clinton. The Iraqi Liberation Act was
passed by a Democrat Congress, YEARS before President Bush took
office - so much for those lies that President Bush had ulterior
motives to remove Saddam, or that the removal of Saddam was based
upon faulty intelligence. If the intelligence was faulty on Iraq,
it was faulty initially during the Clinton administration).
Iraq is a Quagmire Fable
Before the liberation of Iraq experts forecasted that we would
lose at least ten thousand dead soldiers just to take Baghdad
(upwards to 100,000 dead if Saddam used Chemical or Biological
weapons) and another 5000 dead soldiers *per month* just to hold
Iraq until new elections could be held. Instead, President Bush
liberated 50 million people, turned two hostile nations into
allies (Afghanistan and Iraq) and he did it all with fewer than
1500 KIA and accident casualties combined. In contrast, when the
Democrats were running the Vietnam war, they managed to lose much
more than 1500 dead *per week!* Not to mention all previous wars
in which such a small amount of expected casualties suffered was
hailed as a great victory. General Eisenhower, as an example, was
expected to lose 70% of his invading force during the Normandy
Invasion, but instead he only lost about 25%. His 25% casualties
were hailed by the allies and the American people as the greatest
victory ever in the history of modern warfare. But that
Eisenhower victory shrinks to mere insignificance compared to the
Bush accomplishments. So far, President Bush has achieved the
greatest military victories with the fewest casualties (both
military and civilian) than any other war, president, or general
in the history of war involving the United Sates. And that is
what the Bush detractors call a "Quagmire?"
Moreover, during each war there are setbacks and enemy victories.
When we were surprised by the Battle of the Bulge, did everyone
call for the resignation of General Eisenhower, or the
impeachment of President Roosevelt? When the Japanese killed
20,000 Americans when we tried to take a single Island, did
anyone say General MacArthur should resign and that our war in
the Pacific was a "Quagmire?" When the Chinese invaded North
Korea and sent our forces in full retreat, did anyone ask for
President Truman's resignation or demand that General MacArthur
be fired? When General Montgomery failed to take Cahn as
promised, or launched his infamous invasion failure in Holland
dubbed "Market Garden," did the Brits call his failures a
"Quagmire?" When President Lincoln suffered the defeat at
Fredericksburg, did the American people call for his resignation
and call the war of the rebellion a "Quagmire?" True American and
Brit patriots already know it is resolve that wins wars, and some
defeats are inevitable regardless of how many capable or
intelligent Generals we might have.
War is a work in progress. Its events are fluid, and the enemy
might do anything and will always attempt to do what is
unexpected. It is impossible to fight a defensive war and win.
When we defend without counter attacking we will automatically
lose the battle and eventually the war - we cannot circle our
HumVees and hide in compounds. There will always be setbacks and
surprises in war especially when we are on the offensive. No
General in history has been able to consult a crystal ball and
thereby know in advance which or what tactics the enemy is going
to use in the future. The TP's demand that Secretary Rumsfield
must know in advance what the enemy might or might not do or
perpetrate is utterly ridiculous. We must realize that all we can
hope to accomplish in war is to win more battles than we lose -
yes we will lose some battles, and losing battles and suffering
casualties is as much a part of war as is the slinking shadow of
utter brutality that follows war closely.
Voting Machines Were Rigged Fable
How do you rig a simple calculator? DUH! Voting machines are
simple calculators, when a red button is pushed as an example, a
vote is cast for the red side. When a blue button is pushed or a
blue lever is pulled, a vote is cast for the blue side. The
calculators are not programable outside of their prime functions,
not connected to the internet, and both Democrats and Republican
representatives collectively inspected each voting machine and
signed off on an inspection document certifying the machine
worked as represented. In many cases' hundreds of trial votes
were tested on each machine, and those that failed to record or
malfunctioned were taken off line and repaired. Moreover, unless
someone had a crystal ball and knew how many votes would be cast
for each candidate, it would be impossible to rig a calculator to
malfunction in anyone's favor. I should also mention that
hundreds of Congresspersons, Governors, and dozens of lesser
politicians were also elected from these very simple machines and
not one loser has contested the results in the entire nation!
Even John Kerry and the Democrats are not claiming any rigged
voting machines! Since none of those that are trying their best
to further the fable the voting machines were rigged can produce
even a single rigged machine, or explain how a simple calculator
can be rigged, only the drooling idiots of the world are stupid
enough to believe such obvious hype coming from the likes of
those that are just trying to find excuses for their failure to
muster enough votes to elect the traitor Hanoi John Kerry.
John Kerry Told the Truth in the Debates Fable
In truth, if you bother to check factscheck.org, *everything*
Kerry claimed and promised was a bald face lie! I cannot find a
single promise or statement made by Hanoi John Kerry that was
true. If you can find *any* truth Kerry told during the recent
campaign, please post it here and I will prove it was a lie.
President Bush is Stupid Fable
President Bush is a graduate from Yale and Harvard, and his
military IQ test produced a much higher score than John Kerry's
IQ score. Moreover, President Bush's IQ results scored in the top
5% of all that ever took those tests IN THE WORLD! Based upon
President Bush's IQ scores, apparently, President Bush is the
smartest President in our history (his test scores far exceed
Bill Clinton's, Carter's, Regan's and especially exceed by far
John Kennedy's). People do have a history of underestimating
President Bush, and that is just one of the reasons he keeps
winning.
Americans are Stupid Fable
Americans possess college degrees at a 3 to 1 margin over
Europeans. I lived in Europe for seven years and I assure you
that in general Americans are far more intelligent, creative,
ambitious and resourceful in comparison to Europeans. In fact
most Americans that have lived in Europe find many Europeans lazy
and quite misinformed about America and Americans. No wonder all
the smart Europeans, Asians and Africans send their sons and
daughters to American universities.
The Entire Muslim World will Rise Up Against America Fable
When President Bush invaded Afghanistan, the radical Muslim
clerics howled and screamed for "martyrs" to come forth and
commit suicide to kill Americans. The same howling occurred when
President Bush liberated Iraq. Yet all terrorists, including the
crazies that are willing to butcher themselves just to murder,
number only about 20,000 - and those numbers are dwindling fast
thanks to the US forces. In addition, radical Muslim clerics are
finally being arrested in their native lands for advocating
murder and sedition, and Madrases that teach "murder all
non-Muslims" are being shut down, and terrorist funding is
disappearing faster than a Palestinian leader's bank account.
What most that spins this fable do not want their readers to know
is even if millions of Muslims did rise up to fight against the
free world, who would feed or arm them? The only two rogue
nations left that are stupid enough to support radical Islam are
Iran and Syria, and they can barely feed their own populations,
not to mention support an army in the field for any length of
time, especially against a modern American Army. North Korea is
another example. North Korea is reported to have the third
largest standing Army in the world, but North Korea does not have
the food nor other supplies to support that Army in the field for
more than one single week! The USA on the other hand, under a
national emergency edict, could muster at least a 30 million man
Army, and not only feed them, but equip each soldier with state
of the art equipment and supplies. Simply put, Radical Islam does
not have a chance. It is just a matter of time before terrorism
as we know it is defeated.
Terrorist Armies Cannot Be Defeated Fable
In truth, history proves just the opposite is true! Even during
the American Revolution our militias lost every battle against
the British until General Von Stuben was hired by General
Washington to turn our rabble into a Regular Army. The Mexican
Bandits/Terrorists never won their revolution, the Bolo Bolo and
Huk terrorists lost their war, the Confederate Guerillas,
Quantrel and his ilk were destroyed or captured, the American
Indians lost all of their wars and they were perhaps the best
raiders or terrorists the world had ever seen at that time, the
Werewolves Nazi terrorists that continued to use Guerrilla
attacks on the allies after Nazi Germany surrendered were all
destroyed or captured, the Basque, IRA, and their ilk have never
accomplished their goals in the past 80 years of murder, the Viet
Cong, although 500,000 strong and supplied by the USSR were all
but annihilated after the 1968 Tet offensive by the US led allied
forces, the Mafia in the USA has been all but turned into the
Girl Scouts, etc . . . etc . . .
Without the complete and total backing of a super power Guerrilla
tactics are doomed to failure, and even with the backing of the
super power the Guerillas are only as successful as the resolve
of the Super Power to continue to support them.
Radical Islamist terrorists and those nations that aid or support
them are doomed - they are just too stupid to know it yet - but
you can be sure our Soldiers are and will convince them.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Danzig" <tyatcak@telus.net> wrote in message
news:PQCAd.28877$KO5.19848@clgrps13...
DGVREIMAN wrote:
Ignoring the evil radical Islam is perpetrating on the world
while "protesting" America and Israel's defensive retaliations
against the wanton and murderous attacks by the terrorists is
what proves irrefutably those that "march" and "post" for
"peace" are really clandestinely supporting terrorism and
unprovoked religious genocide.
Bull *****..Youre' with me or 'aggin me... the old Hatfiled and
McCoy fued all over again.
Doug says: Read above, if protesters are really against war they
would be against all war, not just against defensive wars
launched by America and Israel.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 01:57:34 PM |
|
|
DGVREIMAN wrote:
WAR FABLES
© Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled by
the pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that "march"
to help Saddam and the terrorists,
That's Doug BLACK and WHITE...nothing in between!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tiny" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 02:17:09 PM |
|
|
There is only good and evil, there is nothing in between.
--
Tiny
=================================================
The biggest troublemaker you'll probably ever have to deal with watches you
shave his face in the mirror every morning.
=================================================
"Danzig" <tyatcak@telus.net> wrote in message
news:O_DAd.35101$dv1.33103@edtnps89...
DGVREIMAN wrote:
WAR FABLES
© Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled by the
pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that "march" to help
Saddam and the terrorists,
That's Doug BLACK and WHITE...nothing in between!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 09:41:41 PM |
|
|
WAR FABLES
© Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled by
the pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that "march"
to help Saddam and the terrorists, yet ignore the 500,000 people
massacred by radical Muslims in the Sudan, ignore the increasing
amount of Iraqis being murdered by the Iranian backed terrorists,
and ignore the butchery and the murder radical Islam is
perpetrating on the entire world in general. Ignoring the evil
radical Islam is perpetrating on the world while "protesting"
America and Israel's defensive retaliations against the wanton
and murderous attacks by the terrorists is what proves
irrefutably those that "march" and "post" for "peace" are really
clandestinely supporting terrorism and unprovoked religious
genocide. It is high time to expose just some of the ridiculous
lies coming from these pro-terrorists:
The Iraqi People Are Resisting the Coalition Fable
In truth, based upon the last AP poll, 83% of all Iraqis do not
want a theocracy in their country. Considering that is precisely
what the Iranian backed terrorists like Zargowai and his ilk are
trying to shove down the throats of the Iraqi people with wanton
butchery and murder, it is clear the majority of the "Iraqi
People" are supporting their Government and they want the
terrorists out just as much as the US led coalition does. I
should also mention that for every Policeman or Iraqi Solider the
goons murder, ten are standing in line to take their fallen
comrade's place. So are the terrorists going to run out of
supplies and moron suicide bombers before Iraq runs out of loyal
citizens - you bet! It is just a matter of time. Moreover, if the
Shiites gain a majority in the new Iraqi Government that will not
produce a de facto theocracy like some of the TP's are trying to
claim. The reason is the approved Iraqi Constitution requires all
three Iraqi factions (the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds) to agree
before any major legislation can be passed - especially any
modification of the Iraqi Constitution. The terrorists and Bid
Laden are desperate to stop the election as they know once it
occurs the UN and all of its member nations will recognize the
new Iraqi Government. That means support will pour in from all
over the world against the terrorists. So the goons are desperate
to discredit or stop the forthcoming Iraqi elections. No doubt
they will be able to intimidate some Iraqis on election day, but
I am told the election may span months if necessary to allow all
Iraqis the opportunity to vote without any intimidation from any
source, including the US led coalition - and the UN observers
will be in Iraq to make sure that happens.
The War in Iraq is Not Justified Fable
In October 2001, our Congress voted unanimously to wage war on
all international terrorists and all those that aid or support
them. Contrary to what the TP's want people to believe, that
resolution of war was NOT restricted just to Al Qaeda. That
resolution of war included all terrorists and all those that aid
or support them. Saddam was not only aiding and supporting
terrorism outside of Iraq, but he was building his own terrorist
army in Iraq! We all have seen the film of the Saddam Fedayeen,
dressed in white Martyr uniforms replete with ski masks, AK -47's
and suicide belts full of explosives high stepping on parade for
Saddam. Those masked goons were not a "girl scout" troop folks.
The TP's want all to ignore the fact that Saddam was building his
own terrorist army and our resolution of war in October 2001
provided complete and unabridged authority for President Bush to
invade Iraq on that basis alone.
Moreover, UN Resolution 1441 called for any or all member nations
to "use all necessary means" to force Saddam to comply with the
provisions of resolution 1441. Saddam was in violation of
resolution 1441 in at least a dozen different ways even if he had
already sent his WMD out of Iraq.
Although the TP's will tell you "there is no evidence of Saddam
and Al Qaeda cooperatively launching attacks" the TP's like to
ignore the fact that our intelligence community has released
evidence of not less than seven high level meetings between
Saddam's intelligence officers and Al Qaeda operatives. So
although we do not possess any "smoking gun" (yet) connecting
Saddam and Al Qaeda with attacks on the free world, we must
wonder if there were no cooperative operations between Saddam's
regime and Al Qaeda then why did they meet together not less than
seven times? If they were not going to work together one meeting
would have sufficed. So what were they doing together those other
six meetings - baking cookies for Uday?
Saddam Never Possessed WMD
In 1998 the UN inspectors cataloged and tagged tons of WMD in
Iraq, and tagged proscribed missiles and Biological Weapon Labs
as well. So Saddam clearly possessed WMD as late as 1998 and what
he did with them will soon be revealed by some of Saddam's
cabinet. The CIA released hard evidence that right before the war
Saddam moved his WMD into Syria and Lebanon via ambulances and
other vehicles. We shall soon find out if that report is
corroborated by Teric Aziz - who is making a deal for his life
and will (has already) spill the beans on WMD.
President Bush Lied About Saddam's Threat Fable
One of the most hilarious and outright lies coming from the TP's
is the one that claims President Bush said we needed to liberate
Iraq because Saddam represented an imminent threat due to his
WMD. Nothing could be further from the truth. In truth, what
President Bush said precisely in his speech advocating the
removal of Saddam and the liberation of the Iraqi people, was
that "we want to remove Saddam *before* he becomes an imminent
threat." President Bush clearly said that Saddam WAS NOT an
imminent threat, but because of his history, and his building of
a terrorist army, and his support of terrorism outside of Iraq,
he would become an imminent threat to the free world if Saddam
was allowed to continue his normal course of policy. President
Bush did not want to wait for another 911-type attack or Mushroom
clouds to start to appear over US Cities before he removed a
sworn enemy, who, by the way, openly and publicly declared war on
the USA, Britain and Israel on December 27, 2000, just ten short
months prior to the 911 massacres and long before President Bush
finally took Congress's direction to remove Saddam from power.
(Congress originally approved the removal of Saddam by military
force in 1998 under Bill Clinton. The Iraqi Liberation Act was
passed by a Democrat Congress, YEARS before President Bush took
office - so much for those lies that President Bush had ulterior
motives to remove Saddam, or that the removal of Saddam was based
upon faulty intelligence. If the intelligence was faulty on Iraq,
it was faulty initially during the Clinton administration).
Iraq is a Quagmire Fable
Before the liberation of Iraq experts forecasted that we would
lose at least ten thousand dead soldiers just to take Baghdad
(upwards to 100,000 dead if Saddam used Chemical or Biological
weapons) and another 5000 dead soldiers *per month* just to hold
Iraq until new elections could be held. Instead, President Bush
liberated 50 million people, turned two hostile nations into
allies (Afghanistan and Iraq) and he did it all with fewer than
1500 KIA and accident casualties combined. In contrast, when the
Democrats were running the Vietnam war, they managed to lose much
more than 1500 dead *per week!* Not to mention all previous wars
in which such a small amount of expected casualties suffered was
hailed as a great victory. General Eisenhower, as an example, was
expected to lose 70% of his invading force during the Normandy
Invasion, but instead he only lost about 25%. His 25% casualties
were hailed by the allies and the American people as the greatest
victory ever in the history of modern warfare. But that
Eisenhower victory shrinks to mere insignificance compared to the
Bush accomplishments. So far, President Bush has achieved the
greatest military victories with the fewest casualties (both
military and civilian) than any other war, president, or general
in the history of war involving the United Sates. And that is
what the Bush detractors call a "Quagmire?"
Moreover, during each war there are setbacks and enemy victories.
When we were surprised by the Battle of the Bulge, did everyone
call for the resignation of General Eisenhower, or the
impeachment of President Roosevelt? When the Japanese killed
20,000 Americans when we tried to take a single Island, did
anyone say General MacArthur should resign and that our war in
the Pacific was a "Quagmire?" When the Chinese invaded North
Korea and sent our forces in full retreat, did anyone ask for
President Truman's resignation or demand that General MacArthur
be fired? When General Montgomery failed to take Cahn as
promised, or launched his infamous invasion failure in Holland
dubbed "Market Garden," did the Brits call his failures a
"Quagmire?" When President Lincoln suffered the defeat at
Fredericksburg, did the American people call for his resignation
and call the war of the rebellion a "Quagmire?" True American and
Brit patriots already know it is resolve that wins wars, and some
defeats are inevitable regardless of how many capable or
intelligent Generals we might have.
War is a work in progress. Its events are fluid, and the enemy
might do anything and will always attempt to do what is
unexpected. It is impossible to fight a defensive war and win.
When we defend without counter attacking we will automatically
lose the battle and eventually the war - we cannot circle our
HumVees and hide in compounds. There will always be setbacks and
surprises in war especially when we are on the offensive. No
General in history has been able to consult a crystal ball and
thereby know in advance which or what tactics the enemy is going
to use in the future. The TP's demand that Secretary Rumsfield
must know in advance what the enemy might or might not do or
perpetrate is utterly ridiculous. We must realize that all we can
hope to accomplish in war is to win more battles than we lose -
yes we will lose some battles, and losing battles and suffering
casualties is as much a part of war as is the slinking shadow of
utter brutality that follows war closely.
Voting Machines Were Rigged Fable
How do you rig a simple calculator? DUH! Voting machines are
simple calculators, when a red button is pushed as an example, a
vote is cast for the red side. When a blue button is pushed or a
blue lever is pulled, a vote is cast for the blue side. The
calculators are not programable outside of their prime functions,
not connected to the internet, and both Democrats and Republican
representatives collectively inspected each voting machine and
signed off on an inspection document certifying the machine
worked as represented. In many cases' hundreds of trial votes
were tested on each machine, and those that failed to record or
malfunctioned were taken off line and repaired. Moreover, unless
someone had a crystal ball and knew how many votes would be cast
for each candidate, it would be impossible to rig a calculator to
malfunction in anyone's favor. I should also mention that
hundreds of Congresspersons, Governors, and dozens of lesser
politicians were also elected from these very simple machines and
not one loser has contested the results in the entire nation!
Even John Kerry and the Democrats are not claiming any rigged
voting machines! Since none of those that are trying their best
to further the fable the voting machines were rigged can produce
even a single rigged machine, or explain how a simple calculator
can be rigged, only the drooling idiots of the world are stupid
enough to believe such obvious hype coming from the likes of
those that are just trying to find excuses for their failure to
muster enough votes to elect the traitor Hanoi John Kerry.
John Kerry Told the Truth in the Debates Fable
In truth, if you bother to check factscheck.org, *everything*
Kerry claimed and promised was a bald face lie! I cannot find a
single promise or statement made by Hanoi John Kerry that was
true. If you can find *any* truth Kerry told during the recent
campaign, please post it here and I will prove it was a lie.
President Bush is Stupid Fable
President Bush is a graduate from Yale and Harvard, and his
military IQ test produced a much higher score than John Kerry's
IQ score. Moreover, President Bush's IQ results scored in the top
5% of all that ever took those tests IN THE WORLD! Based upon
President Bush's IQ scores, apparently, President Bush is the
smartest President in our history (his test scores far exceed
Bill Clinton's, Carter's, Regan's and especially exceed by far
John Kennedy's). People do have a history of underestimating
President Bush, and that is just one of the reasons he keeps
winning.
Americans are Stupid Fable
Americans possess college degrees at a 3 to 1 margin over
Europeans. I lived in Europe for seven years and I assure you
that in general Americans are far more intelligent, creative,
ambitious and resourceful in comparison to Europeans. In fact
most Americans that have lived in Europe find many Europeans lazy
and quite misinformed about America and Americans. No wonder all
the smart Europeans, Asians and Africans send their sons and
daughters to American universities.
The Entire Muslim World will Rise Up Against America Fable
When President Bush invaded Afghanistan, the radical Muslim
clerics howled and screamed for "martyrs" to come forth and
commit suicide to kill Americans. The same howling occurred when
President Bush liberated Iraq. Yet all terrorists, including the
crazies that are willing to butcher themselves just to murder,
number only about 20,000 - and those numbers are dwindling fast
thanks to the US forces. In addition, radical Muslim clerics are
finally being arrested in their native lands for advocating
murder and sedition, and Madrases that teach "murder all
non-Muslims" are being shut down, and terrorist funding is
disappearing faster than a Palestinian leader's bank account.
What most that spins this fable do not want their readers to know
is even if millions of Muslims did rise up to fight against the
free world, who would feed or arm them? The only two rogue
nations left that are stupid enough to support radical Islam are
Iran and Syria, and they can barely feed their own populations,
not to mention support an army in the field for any length of
time, especially against a modern American Army. North Korea is
another example. North Korea is reported to have the third
largest standing Army in the world, but North Korea does not have
the food nor other supplies to support that Army in the field for
more than one single week! The USA on the other hand, under a
national emergency edict, could muster at least a 30 million man
Army, and not only feed them, but equip each soldier with state
of the art equipment and supplies. Simply put, Radical Islam does
not have a chance. It is just a matter of time before terrorism
as we know it is defeated.
Terrorist Armies Cannot Be Defeated Fable
In truth, history proves just the opposite is true! Even during
the American Revolution our militias lost every battle against
the British until General Von Stuben was hired by General
Washington to turn our rabble into a Regular Army. The Mexican
Bandits/Terrorists never won their revolution, the Bolo Bolo and
Huk terrorists lost their war, the Confederate Guerillas,
Quantrel and his ilk were destroyed or captured, the American
Indians lost all of their wars and they were perhaps the best
raiders or terrorists the world had ever seen at that time, the
Werewolves Nazi terrorists that continued to use Guerrilla
attacks on the allies after Nazi Germany surrendered were all
destroyed or captured, the Basque, IRA, and their ilk have never
accomplished their goals in the past 80 years of murder, the Viet
Cong, although 500,000 strong and supplied by the USSR were all
but annihilated after the 1968 Tet offensive by the US led allied
forces, the Mafia in the USA has been all but turned into the
Girl Scouts, etc . . . etc . . .
Without the complete and total backing of a super power Guerrilla
tactics are doomed to failure, and even with the backing of the
super power the Guerillas are only as successful as the resolve
of the Super Power to continue to support them.
Radical Islamist terrorists and those nations that aid or support
them are doomed - they are just too stupid to know it yet - but
you can be sure our Soldiers are and will convince them.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"Danzig" <tyatcak@telus.net> wrote in message
news:O_DAd.35101$dv1.33103@edtnps89...
DGVREIMAN wrote:
WAR FABLES
© Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled
by the pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that
"march" to help Saddam and the terrorists,
That's Doug BLACK and WHITE...nothing in between!
Doug Says: Define in between.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Danzig" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 09:54:08 PM |
|
|
I am constantly amazed at the outright lies and myths howled
by the pro-terrorists. Especially those pro-terrorists that
"march" to help Saddam and the terrorists,
That's Doug BLACK and WHITE...nothing in between!
Doug Says: Define in between.
middle ground ....sometning about which you have NO idea
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR FABLES |
29 Dec 2004 10:22:16 PM |
| | | | |
