| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"EL_FLOJO" |
| Date: |
06 Oct 2003 03:01:16 AM |
| Object: |
WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
If case you haven't heard, Israel is trying to provoke Syria into a War.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_syria&cid=540&ncid=716
This was ALL Planned out beforehand, and you can read the actual plans in
the following paper, written for the Israeli Prime Minister in 1996!!
"A clean break: a new strategy for securing the realm"
http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm
Here's a summary>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"The paper set out a plan by which Israel would "shape its strategic
environment", beginning with the removal of Saddam Hussein and the
installation of a Hashemite monarchy in Baghdad. With Saddam out of the way
and Iraq thus brought under Jordanian Hashemite influence, Jordan and Turkey
would form an axis along with Israel to weaken and "roll back" Syria.
Jordan, it suggested, could also sort out Lebanon by "weaning" the Shia
Muslim population away from Syria and Iran, and re-establishing their former
ties with the Shia in the new Hashemite kingdom of Iraq. "Israel will not
only contain its foes; it will transcend them", the paper concluded. "
The neo-con hawks are behind this, actually Richard Pearle authored that
paper at the link above, which spells out an ultra-right policy for the
region. and now it seems they are pushing for 'A CLEAN
BREAK' --------remember those words ----regarding Syria, a baathist state
like Iraq. The title of the Paper "a clean break" was actually used by the
WhiteHouse folks Yesterday when referring to this attack on Syria. Spooky
Eh...??
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4493638,00.html
We need to STOP Bush and his Masters, this ***** has to End!
These neo-cons are Traitors!
.
|
|
| User: "John Starrett" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
07 Oct 2003 11:39:26 AM |
|
|
EL_FLOJO wrote:
If case you haven't heard, Israel is trying to provoke Syria into a War.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_syria&cid=540&ncid=716
<snip>
A war against Syria would be a good campaign strategy for Bush just
before the election. Time it right and we will get fireworks, but few
deaths before November 4.
--
John Starrett
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Macho Milquetoast" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
07 Oct 2003 07:10:22 PM |
|
|
"John Starrett" <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote in message
news:3f82ec90$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
EL_FLOJO wrote:
If case you haven't heard, Israel is trying to provoke Syria into a War.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_syria&cid=540&ncid=716
<snip>
A war against Syria would be a good campaign strategy for Bush just
before the election. Time it right and we will get fireworks, but few
deaths before November 4.
We can't pull it off. Our troops will still be in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Public reports on PBS "The New Hour" stated that there were three divisions
available. Subsequent report on broadcast news said another division was
activated. So, as far as we can tell, there are only two Army divisions to
be deployed in a presumptive war on Syria. This doesn't take into account
the necessary support forces. If anything, we'd need the full support of
the Israeli forces to pull it off, but even Bush isn't stupid enough to do
that - then again...
James
.
|
|
|
| User: "EL_FLOJO" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
07 Oct 2003 10:31:54 PM |
|
|
No, not Our troops
If you read the paper that I linked to by Uber-Hawk Richard Pearle, the
Israelis will fight this little dust up, and we will Fully support anything
they do to oust the ruling party from Syria, and Lebanon as well.
Dont ya just love these Chicken-Hawks that have never fired a weapon in
their lives!
They are so pumped that Stage 1, (Iraq) is nearing completion, and Stage 2
is coming!!!
Read the Project for a New American Century's papers.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/defensenationalsecurity.htm
It is all laid out...
--
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only
unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public."
--- President Teddy Roosevelt
"The Macho Milquetoast" <jwa1968@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:OBIgb.5116$mQ2.4127@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"John Starrett" <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote in message
news:3f82ec90$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
EL_FLOJO wrote:
If case you haven't heard, Israel is trying to provoke Syria into a
War.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_syria&cid=540&ncid=716
<snip>
A war against Syria would be a good campaign strategy for Bush just
before the election. Time it right and we will get fireworks, but few
deaths before November 4.
We can't pull it off. Our troops will still be in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Public reports on PBS "The New Hour" stated that there were three
divisions
available. Subsequent report on broadcast news said another division was
activated. So, as far as we can tell, there are only two Army divisions
to
be deployed in a presumptive war on Syria. This doesn't take into account
the necessary support forces. If anything, we'd need the full support of
the Israeli forces to pull it off, but even Bush isn't stupid enough to do
that - then again...
James
.
|
|
|
| User: "John R. Strohm" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
08 Oct 2003 07:43:10 AM |
|
|
Flo, maybe you haven't been reading the newspapers for the last, oh, say, 30
years, but Israel and Syria have NEVER been friendly. The closest they ever
got to friendly status was a brief period in 1983 or so, when they were BOTH
shooting at Yasser Arafat. See, Arafat was almost ready to try to find a
political accomodation with Israel, having gotten his ***** kicked enough
times to get his attention, and Syria was having NONE of that, but
meanwhile, Arafat had not figured out that Israel might be a bit nicer to
him if he reigned in his PLO teddy-boys, and so Israel was none too friendly
toward him either...
As long as Syria has sponsored the "Palestinian" "resistance", and aided
Palestinian terrorism, it is to be expected that Israel would EVENTUALLY get
fed up and say "ENOUGH!", and then do something drastic and permanent about
it.
Incidentally, Syria knows all about doing drastic and permanent things. Do
a Google search on "Hama Rules".
"EL_FLOJO" <gologa123@no_spam_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:KyLgb.1250$tk1.808@twister.austin.rr.com...
No, not Our troops
If you read the paper that I linked to by Uber-Hawk Richard Pearle, the
Israelis will fight this little dust up, and we will Fully support
anything
they do to oust the ruling party from Syria, and Lebanon as well.
Dont ya just love these Chicken-Hawks that have never fired a weapon in
their lives!
They are so pumped that Stage 1, (Iraq) is nearing completion, and Stage 2
is coming!!!
Read the Project for a New American Century's papers.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/defensenationalsecurity.htm
It is all laid out...
--
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only
unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public."
--- President Teddy Roosevelt
"The Macho Milquetoast" <jwa1968@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:OBIgb.5116$mQ2.4127@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"John Starrett" <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote in message
news:3f82ec90$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
EL_FLOJO wrote:
If case you haven't heard, Israel is trying to provoke Syria into a
War.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea/is
rael_syria&cid=540&ncid=716
<snip>
A war against Syria would be a good campaign strategy for Bush just
before the election. Time it right and we will get fireworks, but few
deaths before November 4.
We can't pull it off. Our troops will still be in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Public reports on PBS "The New Hour" stated that there were three
divisions
available. Subsequent report on broadcast news said another division
was
activated. So, as far as we can tell, there are only two Army divisions
to
be deployed in a presumptive war on Syria. This doesn't take into
account
the necessary support forces. If anything, we'd need the full support
of
the Israeli forces to pull it off, but even Bush isn't stupid enough to
do
that - then again...
James
.
|
|
|
| User: "EL_FLOJO" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
08 Oct 2003 11:46:03 AM |
|
|
DID YOU BOTHER TO READ THE FRIGGAN PAPER BY RICHARD PEARLE.???
http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm
Obviously not, from reading your half-informed, poor summary of the regional
conflict, you don't seen to grasp the long term intent of the hawks...of
re-shaping the region, through provoked response war.
Do your homework first Please.
--
"John R. Strohm" <strohm@airmail.net> wrote in message
news:bm10ui$ko8@library1.airnews.net...
Flo, maybe you haven't been reading the newspapers for the last, oh, say,
30
years, but Israel and Syria have NEVER been friendly. The closest they
ever
got to friendly status was a brief period in 1983 or so, when they were
BOTH
shooting at Yasser Arafat. See, Arafat was almost ready to try to find a
political accomodation with Israel, having gotten his ***** kicked enough
times to get his attention, and Syria was having NONE of that, but
meanwhile, Arafat had not figured out that Israel might be a bit nicer to
him if he reigned in his PLO teddy-boys, and so Israel was none too
friendly
toward him either...
As long as Syria has sponsored the "Palestinian" "resistance", and aided
Palestinian terrorism, it is to be expected that Israel would EVENTUALLY
get
fed up and say "ENOUGH!", and then do something drastic and permanent
about
it.
Incidentally, Syria knows all about doing drastic and permanent things.
Do
a Google search on "Hama Rules".
"EL_FLOJO" <gologa123@no_spam_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:KyLgb.1250$tk1.808@twister.austin.rr.com...
No, not Our troops
If you read the paper that I linked to by Uber-Hawk Richard Pearle, the
Israelis will fight this little dust up, and we will Fully support
anything
they do to oust the ruling party from Syria, and Lebanon as well.
Dont ya just love these Chicken-Hawks that have never fired a weapon in
their lives!
They are so pumped that Stage 1, (Iraq) is nearing completion, and Stage
2
is coming!!!
Read the Project for a New American Century's papers.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/defensenationalsecurity.htm
It is all laid out...
--
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that
we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only
unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American
public."
--- President Teddy Roosevelt
"The Macho Milquetoast" <jwa1968@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:OBIgb.5116$mQ2.4127@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
"John Starrett" <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote in message
news:3f82ec90$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
EL_FLOJO wrote:
If case you haven't heard, Israel is trying to provoke Syria into
a
War.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea/is
rael_syria&cid=540&ncid=716
<snip>
A war against Syria would be a good campaign strategy for Bush just
before the election. Time it right and we will get fireworks, but
few
deaths before November 4.
We can't pull it off. Our troops will still be in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
Public reports on PBS "The New Hour" stated that there were three
divisions
available. Subsequent report on broadcast news said another division
was
activated. So, as far as we can tell, there are only two Army
divisions
to
be deployed in a presumptive war on Syria. This doesn't take into
account
the necessary support forces. If anything, we'd need the full support
of
the Israeli forces to pull it off, but even Bush isn't stupid enough
to
do
that - then again...
James
.
|
|
|
| User: "cory" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
08 Oct 2003 01:37:19 PM |
|
|
EL_FLOJO wrote:
DID YOU BOTHER TO READ THE FRIGGAN PAPER BY RICHARD PEARLE.???
http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm
Obviously not, from reading your half-informed, poor summary of the regional
conflict, you don't seen to grasp the long term intent of the hawks...of
re-shaping the region, through provoked response war.
Do your homework first Please.
I read that paper, and I don't think it supports what you're claiming.
If you've read my earlier posts, you'd know I'm the last person to
defend Israel's actions. But this attack is exactly the sort of measured
response that a nation should make in order to exercise its right to
self-defense. What would you have Israel do, dissolve itself?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "LarryG" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
07 Oct 2003 04:20:22 PM |
|
|
"John Starrett" <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote in message
news:3f82ec90$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
EL_FLOJO wrote:
If case you haven't heard, Israel is trying to provoke Syria into a War.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea/israel_syria&cid=540&ncid=716
<snip>
A war against Syria would be a good campaign strategy for Bush just
before the election. Time it right and we will get fireworks, but few
deaths before November 4.
With as much heat as the administration is getting for cost overruns in Iraq
I would think that the American people would not fall for the same
pseudo-patriotic rhetoric to justify a war with Syria.
Cheers,
Larry G.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
10 Oct 2003 07:37:48 PM |
|
|
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065559534.678481@backup.vvm.com:
"John Starrett" <jstarret@nmt.edu> wrote in message
news:3f82ec90$1_4@corp.newsgroups.com...
EL_FLOJO wrote:
If case you haven't heard, Israel is trying to provoke Syria into a
War.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031006/ap_on_re_mi_ea
/israel_syria&cid=540&ncid=716
<snip>
A war against Syria would be a good campaign strategy for Bush just
before the election. Time it right and we will get fireworks, but few
deaths before November 4.
With as much heat as the administration is getting for cost overruns in
Iraq I would think that the American people would not fall for the same
pseudo-patriotic rhetoric to justify a war with Syria.
Cheers,
Larry G.
Nope...they'll just use their middle eastern attack proxy (NOT "poxy"!) dog,
Israel.
We got to get SOMETHING back for that 10 billion we give them each year.
War u bean, son?
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LarryG" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
10 Oct 2003 09:39:31 PM |
|
|
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9410C9B44BC56fakeeamilwhoknowscom@63.223.5.254...
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065559534.678481@backup.vvm.com:
With as much heat as the administration is getting for cost overruns in
Iraq I would think that the American people would not fall for the same
pseudo-patriotic rhetoric to justify a war with Syria.
Cheers,
Larry G.
Nope...they'll just use their middle eastern attack proxy (NOT "poxy"!)
dog,
Israel.
We got to get SOMETHING back for that 10 billion we give them each year.
An Aggie walks into a bar with a pig under his arm.
The bartender looks at 'em and says, "Where the hell did you
get that thing?"
The pig replies, "I won him at a raffle!"
In any puppet show where ventriloquism is part of the act,
you'd do well to know who's the master, and who's the
dummy. [Hint: Jar Jar Bush ain't all that bright. And Israel
is full of some really smart people.]
America has been used as Israel's puppet and patsy for decades,
not the other way around, as much as some might wish to believe.
War u bean, son?
Relocatin' near the beautiful "crime free, God fearing, commie-hating"
city of Wacko, uh . . . WACO!
FYI, this may not make the Austin news channels, but Waco is
just as fucked up as Austin, -- they're just more hypocritical about
it.
Though I was never successful at it, I do miss frog hunting.
Cheers,
Larry G.
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
11 Oct 2003 01:37:01 AM |
|
|
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065838423.52049@backup.vvm.com:
In any puppet show where ventriloquism is part of the act,
you'd do well to know who's the master, and who's the
dummy. [Hint: Jar Jar Bush ain't all that bright. And Israel
is full of some really smart people.]
And I thought you liberals hated the idea of racist stereo types...so those
wily hebes are really crafty, eh?
I heard they're really good at money to!
America has been used as Israel's puppet and patsy for decades,
not the other way around, as much as some might wish to believe.
War u bean, son?
Relocatin' near the beautiful "crime free, God fearing, commie-hating"
city of Wacko, uh . . . WACO!
You know what Whacky Wacoites do to liberals up in them thar teeny little
hills, doncha?
Hint: It's not pretty.
Hint#2: You DID see Texas Chainsaw Massacre, right? Remember, humans were
called Long pig by the south sea islanders, another "culture" the liberals
all want us to respect, along with fathers introducing their virgin 11 year
old daughers into sex and selling their wive's favors to seamen.
Yup, those happy micronesians and Yap islanders and bongo thumping frolicking
much culturally superior-to-us old western white mens, yup, they's fly!
FYI, this may not make the Austin news channels, but Waco is
just as fucked up as Austin, -- they're just more hypocritical about
it.
I'm surprised they even have internet service...but then again, I guess all
those baptists must have found out that they can pray online a lot easier
than going to church.
Though I was never successful at it, I do miss frog hunting.
Thinking of doing some more night hunting soon and eating their little deep
fried legs and washing them down with good beer.
You know where I hand upside down at night, so, if in town, poop on my head
and I'll wake up.
Cheers,
Larry G.
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "LarryG" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
11 Oct 2003 06:41:38 PM |
|
|
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote in message
news:Xns941112937992Bfakeeamilwhoknowscom@63.223.5.254...
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065838423.52049@backup.vvm.com:
In any puppet show where ventriloquism is part of the act,
you'd do well to know who's the master, and who's the
dummy. [Hint: Jar Jar Bush ain't all that bright. And Israel
is full of some really smart people.]
And I thought you liberals hated the idea of racist stereo types...so
those
wily hebes are really crafty, eh?
I heard they're really good at money to!
I keep telling you, I AM NOT A LIBERAL! Many of my ideals are embraced
by liberals, but that is a sign of their intelligence, not my lack thereof.
; - )
Like you, I tend to agree that cultures affect intellectual ability,
emotional
temperment, and general success in life. And I agree that Jewish culture
is among the best in the world at promoting these attributes. (The "cost",
if there is any, is a cultural tendency to neurosis, arrogance and
ethnocentrism.)
As for money, there was a recent article (somewhere) relating success
(with money) with an active religious life. And there is a cultural
emphasis
on work and money in the lives of many Jews.
FYI, this may not make the Austin news channels, but Waco is
just as fucked up as Austin, -- they're just more hypocritical about
it.
I'm surprised they even have internet service...but then again, I guess
all
those baptists must have found out that they can pray online a lot easier
than going to church.
Little Known History: Waco lead the nation in public promotion of energy
efficiency during the first Oil Embargo. They paved huge parking lots onto
which everyone would park (mostly Buicks and Oldsmobiles). Then a
variety of portable buildings would be driven onto the perimeter, according
to
the day and time. On workdays, places of employment would show up about
8:00am. Then about 5:00pm, they would all disappear, and a bunch of bars
would take their place. About midnight, the drunks would stumble out of
the mobile bars, along with their dates, and walk over to the by-the-hour
motels. When they had done, they'd be sober enough to drive home to their
spouses. On Sundays, of course, all of this was replaced by churches,
mostly
Baptist, after the sermons let out, folks would stand around and socialize
until the mobile Luby's and KFC parked, where they'd all have Sunday
dinner together.
It worked fine. They saved millions of gallons of gas every month, and
had fewer drunk drivers. Just as many hypocrites as ever, but think of
all the oil and souls they saved.
Cheers,
Larry G.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
12 Oct 2003 11:14:45 PM |
|
|
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065914347.340477@backup.vvm.com:
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote in message
news:Xns941112937992Bfakeeamilwhoknowscom@63.223.5.254...
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065838423.52049@backup.vvm.com:
In any puppet show where ventriloquism is part of the act,
you'd do well to know who's the master, and who's the
dummy. [Hint: Jar Jar Bush ain't all that bright. And Israel
is full of some really smart people.]
And I thought you liberals hated the idea of racist stereo types...so
those
wily hebes are really crafty, eh?
I heard they're really good at money to!
I keep telling you, I AM NOT A LIBERAL! Many of my ideals are embraced
by liberals, but that is a sign of their intelligence, not my lack thereof.
; - )
Like you, I tend to agree that cultures affect intellectual ability,
emotional
temperment, and general success in life. And I agree that Jewish culture
is among the best in the world at promoting these attributes. (The "cost",
if there is any, is a cultural tendency to neurosis, arrogance and
ethnocentrism.)
As for money, there was a recent article (somewhere) relating success
(with money) with an active religious life. And there is a cultural
emphasis
on work and money in the lives of many Jews.
I saw that article...it was cleverly put in the paper as a real story but if
you looked closely at the sunday paper heading that it was in the tiny header
at the top said "religion".
I can take a poll myself that will prove than anyone with any religion is a
child molester.
The most active rich jews are non-orthodox. Being part of the Synagogue is
just a good way of keeping the "good old boys" network alive and kicking.
In small Texas towns it used to be the Rotary club; that was where all the
intelligent people went and the dumbasses all went into the elks, that
catholic club and others and wore little red fezs and made asses of
themselves.
There is a cultural emphisis on saving, working hard and achieving success
through education in WESTERN CIVILIZATION and it has nothing to do about
religion.
The vast superiority of white western civ is beyond arguement when compared
to the rest of the world...and most of the Jews in Israel are the result of
the giant culling by Hitler and are of the white northern European ancestry.
They got a double whammy which leads to their clear superiority in just about
everything over the arabs; mental achievments, science, technology, farming,
ranching, fighting, industry, literature, government, computers etc.
This is why the average Isreali is way above the mental and physical norm
compared to the average arab and even average American.
They are a vastly superior people and it shows..which is why the arabs, the
French and Germans hate them.
Cheers,
Larry G.
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "God Bless Texas" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
13 Oct 2003 09:15:05 AM |
|
|
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote
the Jews in Israel are the result of
the giant culling by Hitler and are of the white northern European
ancestry.
They got a double whammy which leads to their clear superiority in just
about
everything over the arabs; mental achievments, science, technology,
farming,
ranching, fighting, industry, literature, government, computers etc.
Don't leave out the part about their cultural insistence on success. That
not only carried them through some very hard times, but has made them climb
back onto the horse and ride back to the front of the pack.
You could cull almost any other social/cultural group, even Northern
Europeans, in a similar way and produce nowhere near the same result.
And if the NE aspect is so important, why are some of the most ridiculously
socialist states in the Scandanavian peninsula?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
14 Oct 2003 10:33:27 PM |
|
|
"God Bless Texas"
<no.how.no.one@no.where.com>news:Jryib.28877$592.16490@twister.austin.rr.com:
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote
the Jews in Israel are the result of
the giant culling by Hitler and are of the white northern European
ancestry.
They got a double whammy which leads to their clear superiority in just
about
everything over the arabs; mental achievments, science, technology,
farming,
ranching, fighting, industry, literature, government, computers etc.
Don't leave out the part about their cultural insistence on success. That
not only carried them through some very hard times, but has made them climb
back onto the horse and ride back to the front of the pack.
You could cull almost any other social/cultural group, even Northern
Europeans, in a similar way and produce nowhere near the same result.
And if the NE aspect is so important, why are some of the most ridiculously
socialist states in the Scandanavian peninsula?
An aberation of local politics, that only lasted maybe 20 or 30 years, and
most of those socialist countries are back into the capitalist fold after
destroying their economies and falling behind the rest of the world for a
pace.
Finland, with very limited resouces, much less than Mexico, or Colombia or
Indonesia, have some of the highest literacy rates, lowest death rates,
longevity and health rates and per capita income.
And how to do they accomplish this? The general population is stable,
healthy, superior in intellect, health and ability and they have strict
immigration controls.
We here in USA played at socialism for 30 years with the disaterous results
of a 3 world school system, 2nd world health and mortality and infant deaths,
poverty, we are a debtor nation and the average american is worth less than a
penny.
We are now slowly, slowly turning around but for us, for Germany and France,
for Sweden and Holland it's too late.
For Australia, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, they might be ok, IF they tread a
very thin line in the coming years.
They're already talking about closing their borders to immigration and Poland
has already done so...intelligent people are forcing the needed reforms upon
the people slowly, but for many countries it's too late.
During the good years of the 10's to the 80's, the world had a chance to
prosper for everyone, to have no starvation, to have basic medical care and
such; but two world wars where the world lost the cream of the crop of the
white civilization's best and brightest people and de-populated nothern
europe 3 times while the rest of the world was breeding like crazy; the
infrastructure, money and ability was lost until the 60's and 70's and it was
sustainable but by the 80's Indians, Chinese, Pakis and Bangladeshian were
starving to death by the millions and most of Africa was starting to collapse
after the last colonial powers left the poor blacks all by themselves to kill
and eat each other.
By the 80's overpopulation and no central world government meant that the
world was doomed and the chances of world peace and prosperity was wasted in
the 2 world wars and the cold war with trillions wasted on ***** when we
should have instead been nuetering most poeple around the world and the
average indian in India today would be driving a nice little car and living
in polution free air and eating fresh fish caught in the ocean daily.
It's too late. We squandered our resources and no matter how many hybrid
rices we invent or even if solar power was .000004c a watt, it's too late.
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Grumpy au Contraire" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
10 Oct 2003 10:25:05 PM |
|
|
LarryG wrote:
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9410C9B44BC56fakeeamilwhoknowscom@63.223.5.254...
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065559534.678481@backup.vvm.com:
With as much heat as the administration is getting for cost overruns in
Iraq I would think that the American people would not fall for the same
pseudo-patriotic rhetoric to justify a war with Syria.
Cheers,
Larry G.
Nope...they'll just use their middle eastern attack proxy (NOT "poxy"!)
dog,
Israel.
We got to get SOMETHING back for that 10 billion we give them each year.
An Aggie walks into a bar with a pig under his arm.
The bartender looks at 'em and says, "Where the hell did you
get that thing?"
The pig replies, "I won him at a raffle!"
In any puppet show where ventriloquism is part of the act,
you'd do well to know who's the master, and who's the
dummy. [Hint: Jar Jar Bush ain't all that bright. And Israel
is full of some really smart people.]
America has been used as Israel's puppet and patsy for decades,
not the other way around, as much as some might wish to believe.
War u bean, son?
Relocatin' near the beautiful "crime free, God fearing, commie-hating"
city of Wacko, uh . . . WACO!
FYI, this may not make the Austin news channels, but Waco is
just as fucked up as Austin, -- they're just more hypocritical about
it.
Though I was never successful at it, I do miss frog hunting.
Cheers,
Larry G.
You in big trouble son... They's hate liberals in Waco. String some of
'em up I hear...
--
JT
Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4
.
|
|
|
| User: "LarryG" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
11 Oct 2003 06:03:27 PM |
|
|
"Grumpy au Contraire" <Grumpy@doofis.FAKEcom> wrote in message
news:3F877946.F1FA9EA1@doofis.FAKEcom...
LarryG wrote:
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9410C9B44BC56fakeeamilwhoknowscom@63.223.5.254...
War u bean, son?
Relocatin' near the beautiful "crime free, God fearing, commie-hating"
city of Wacko, uh . . . WACO!
FYI, this may not make the Austin news channels, but Waco is
just as fucked up as Austin, -- they're just more hypocritical about
it.
You in big trouble son... They's hate liberals in Waco. String some of
'em up I hear...
Youz might be thinkin' a' negroes. Skin color is about the only criterion
Central Texans are good at discriminatin'. Figuring out who's a liberal
would take too much thinking, something the local schools don't teach.
[They do tend to specialize in beer drinking and high schools sports,
sortof in preparation for U.T. Austin.]
Cheers,
Larry G.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cory" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
10 Oct 2003 11:57:24 PM |
|
|
LarryG wrote:
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9410C9B44BC56fakeeamilwhoknowscom@63.223.5.254...
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065559534.678481@backup.vvm.com:
With as much heat as the administration is getting for cost overruns in
Iraq I would think that the American people would not fall for the same
pseudo-patriotic rhetoric to justify a war with Syria.
Cheers,
Larry G.
Nope...they'll just use their middle eastern attack proxy (NOT "poxy"!)
dog,
Israel.
We got to get SOMETHING back for that 10 billion we give them each year.
An Aggie walks into a bar with a pig under his arm.
The bartender looks at 'em and says, "Where the hell did you
get that thing?"
The pig replies, "I won him at a raffle!"
In any puppet show where ventriloquism is part of the act,
you'd do well to know who's the master, and who's the
dummy. [Hint: Jar Jar Bush ain't all that bright. And Israel
is full of some really smart people.]
America has been used as Israel's puppet and patsy for decades,
not the other way around, as much as some might wish to believe.
It's an intoxicating idea, but I don't buy it. The US and Israel have a
symbiotic relationship centered on a common need to stifle power in the
Middle East. Israel needs land and security, and the US needs cheap oil.
Both will go to extremes to accomplish these ends.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
11 Oct 2003 01:46:31 AM |
|
|
cory
<postmaster@hotmail.com>news:U4Mhb.181$8x2.115285@newssrv26.news.prodigy.com:
LarryG wrote:
"Mapanari" <Fakeaddress@nonexistant.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9410C9B44BC56fakeeamilwhoknowscom@63.223.5.254...
"LarryG" <no.return.addr@none.com>news:1065559534.678481@backup.vvm.com:
With as much heat as the administration is getting for cost overruns in
Iraq I would think that the American people would not fall for the same
pseudo-patriotic rhetoric to justify a war with Syria.
Cheers,
Larry G.
Nope...they'll just use their middle eastern attack proxy (NOT "poxy"!)
dog,
Israel.
We got to get SOMETHING back for that 10 billion we give them each year.
An Aggie walks into a bar with a pig under his arm.
The bartender looks at 'em and says, "Where the hell did you
get that thing?"
The pig replies, "I won him at a raffle!"
In any puppet show where ventriloquism is part of the act,
you'd do well to know who's the master, and who's the
dummy. [Hint: Jar Jar Bush ain't all that bright. And Israel
is full of some really smart people.]
America has been used as Israel's puppet and patsy for decades,
not the other way around, as much as some might wish to believe.
It's an intoxicating idea, but I don't buy it. The US and Israel have a
symbiotic relationship centered on a common need to stifle power in the
Middle East. Israel needs land and security, and the US needs cheap oil.
Both will go to extremes to accomplish these ends.
You're forgetting another critical compenent....Israelis are western cultured
civilized people who can speak english and come from Europe and think, act
and behave like normal human beings and have our same superior culture.
This is why the lazy, stupid, torturing, murdering arab is insanely jealous
of them and wants to rape, murder and kill every Jew in the world.
The westerners (who happen to be jews) took a destitute land, bought all of
it fair and square from lazy stupid arabs and turks, turned Isreal into a
garden of eden and now the lazy arabs want it back, by any means they can.
America and Israel are connected by culture, and our culutures are the most
superiour cultures this world has ever seen.
To let Isreal fall under as burning murdering hordes of ravening lice-ridden
arabs is to let the light die out in that whole part of the world.
Remember, this has never been a war about religion; religion is always an
excuse for people to behave badly.
It's about a clash of cultures; one is vastly superior and has kicked arab
***** every time they poke their dirty faces up, and the other fucks little
boys, tortures animals for fun, backstabs and accomplishes exactly nothing.
Btw...there is no "arab" civiliation...all the great "arab" civilizations
were either Kurdish (El Sah La Din..Saladin) Byzantine, Greek, Roman, Persian
or Viking. No Arab has ever had a great civilization unless you want to go
back 20,000 years, and remember, the ancient Egyptians weren't arabs, and
they wern't black, they were mostly white.
Funny how american negroes can go to an egyptian museaum, see thousands of
caucasoid chareteristic statues of ancient egyptians, and then still make
pathetic fools out of themselves by saying "oh, we're egyptians!".
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "cory" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
11 Oct 2003 04:02:36 PM |
|
|
Mapanari wrote:
<racist rant snipped>
The westerners (who happen to be jews) took a destitute land, bought all of
it fair and square from lazy stupid arabs and turks, turned Isreal into a
garden of eden and now the lazy arabs want it back, by any means they can.
When did the act of buying land grant one sovereign power over it? If
the Japanese who own much of Hawaii declared a portion of it as a new
sovereign homeland for Japanese, would you accept that?
Btw...there is no "arab" civiliation...all the great "arab" civilizations
were either Kurdish (El Sah La Din..Saladin) Byzantine, Greek, Roman, Persian
You're misinformed. Simply perusing the Brittanica, one will find that
there is a long history of Arabic civilizations. And what makes you
think Saladin wasn't an Arab? He was born in Tikrit, was Muslim, and
spoke Arabic. What more do you need?
.
|
|
|
| User: "God Bless Texas" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
12 Oct 2003 09:43:59 PM |
|
|
"cory" <postmaster@hotmail.com> wrote
You're misinformed. Simply perusing the Brittanica, one will find that
there is a long history of Arabic civilizations. And what makes you
think Saladin wasn't an Arab? He was born in Tikrit, was Muslim, and
spoke Arabic. What more do you need?
A little research will tell you that Salah Al-Din Youssef Ibn Ayyub
(Saladin) was the son of the Kurdish military governor (Ayyub) of Takrit in
Upper Mesopotamia.
He inherited his father's career in the service of the Turkish ruler of
Syria, and then found himself ruler of Egypt when the last Fatimid Shi'ite
caliph died in 1171, having been sent to the country as head of a Syrian
army bent on restoring Sunni Islam.
That's not Arabic, although it is someone who follows the Arabic religion.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
12 Oct 2003 11:07:02 PM |
|
|
"God Bless Texas"
<no.how.no.one@no.where.com>news:Pjoib.26607$592.9985@twister.austin.rr.com:
"cory" <postmaster@hotmail.com> wrote
You're misinformed. Simply perusing the Brittanica, one will find that
there is a long history of Arabic civilizations. And what makes you
think Saladin wasn't an Arab? He was born in Tikrit, was Muslim, and
spoke Arabic. What more do you need?
A little research will tell you that Salah Al-Din Youssef Ibn Ayyub
(Saladin) was the son of the Kurdish military governor (Ayyub) of Takrit in
Upper Mesopotamia.
He inherited his father's career in the service of the Turkish ruler of
Syria, and then found himself ruler of Egypt when the last Fatimid Shi'ite
caliph died in 1171, having been sent to the country as head of a Syrian
army bent on restoring Sunni Islam.
That's not Arabic, although it is someone who follows the Arabic religion.
BTW...another small addition: Look up "Seljuk Turkomen" in the Britanica.
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
12 Oct 2003 11:06:28 PM |
|
|
"God Bless Texas"
<no.how.no.one@no.where.com>news:Pjoib.26607$592.9985@twister.austin.rr.com:
"cory" <postmaster@hotmail.com> wrote
You're misinformed. Simply perusing the Brittanica, one will find that
there is a long history of Arabic civilizations. And what makes you
think Saladin wasn't an Arab? He was born in Tikrit, was Muslim, and
spoke Arabic. What more do you need?
A little research will tell you that Salah Al-Din Youssef Ibn Ayyub
(Saladin) was the son of the Kurdish military governor (Ayyub) of Takrit in
Upper Mesopotamia.
He inherited his father's career in the service of the Turkish ruler of
Syria, and then found himself ruler of Egypt when the last Fatimid Shi'ite
caliph died in 1171, having been sent to the country as head of a Syrian
army bent on restoring Sunni Islam.
That's not Arabic, although it is someone who follows the Arabic religion.
Substitute "Turkish" for "Byzantine and you've got it right.
And "Syrian" is a misnomer used by public school teachers to give their
students a faint idea of what they're talking about. There was no Syria
until Britain carved up the Ottoman empire after WWI which has led to all the
problems in the middle east since.
Hint: Saddam Hussien really did have a legitimate gripe saying that Kuwait
belongs to Iraq.
What he didn't say was the most of the rest of Iraq should belong to Iran,
Turkey, Armenia and Kurdistan. He kind of left that out in his speeches!
<s>
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
12 Oct 2003 11:01:56 PM |
|
|
cory
<postmaster@hotmail.com>news:Md_hb.341$8x2.276806@newssrv26.news.prodigy.co
m:
Mapanari wrote:
<racist rant snipped>
The westerners (who happen to be jews) took a destitute land, bought
all of it fair and square from lazy stupid arabs and turks, turned
Isreal into a garden of eden and now the lazy arabs want it back, by
any means they can.
When did the act of buying land grant one sovereign power over it? If
the Japanese who own much of Hawaii declared a portion of it as a new
sovereign homeland for Japanese, would you accept that?
Uh, using your logic the Israelis should give back all that land to the
English.
Btw...there is no "arab" civiliation...all the great "arab"
civilizations were either Kurdish (El Sah La Din..Saladin) Byzantine,
Greek, Roman, Persian
You're misinformed. Simply perusing the Brittanica, one will find that
there is a long history of Arabic civilizations. And what makes you
think Saladin wasn't an Arab? He was born in Tikrit, was Muslim, and
spoke Arabic. What more do you need?
He was Kurdish, which is a race of people....oh, do your own research.
Been reading a lot of arab propaganda recently have we?
Are you one of those arabs that slinks around like the indians and muslims do
on this newsgroup with an american sounding name so they'll be taken
seriously?
Long History of Arabs? You must be joking.
Most of the great history of the "arabs" was not arabic to begin with.
We'll start with the Persians, then go to the Greeks, then the Pathans and
the Synthians and the Romans and the Vikings who founded the royal families
of most of the rulers in Arabia to this day (Look up Hassimite/Hashimite in
your Brittanica son) then look up "Mameluks" and then "Varengian Guard" and
then look up....oh well, take a few history course taught by real teachers
and not liberal palestinian democrats who are mainly anti-semitic.
I really can't think of one, not one single solitary great civilization
founded and started by any of these "arabs" that you so love.
I'd be willing to bet you can tell me all about the great black cities and
civilizations of Egypt and Africa too and how Cleopatria really was a Zulu
warrioress, eh?
Lets move north east and now you can tell me about the great Moroccan and
Algerian civilizations of arabs....hint: Study up on Vandels, Visigoths etc.
You might even want to go back into Carthaginian history and explain to me
these "Arabs" who almost conquered Rome and where they came from, and lets go
back even a bit further to the Phoenicians who founded the Mayan dynsaties
and put cities all around the med and african coasts and how these "arabs"
were so succcesful.
This is fun...can we play some more?
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "cory" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
13 Oct 2003 09:00:32 AM |
|
|
Mapanari wrote:
cory
<postmaster@hotmail.com>news:Md_hb.341$8x2.276806@newssrv26.news.prodigy.co
m:
Mapanari wrote:
<racist rant snipped>
The westerners (who happen to be jews) took a destitute land, bought
all of it fair and square from lazy stupid arabs and turks, turned
Isreal into a garden of eden and now the lazy arabs want it back, by
any means they can.
When did the act of buying land grant one sovereign power over it? If
the Japanese who own much of Hawaii declared a portion of it as a new
sovereign homeland for Japanese, would you accept that?
Uh, using your logic the Israelis should give back all that land to the
English.
No. I simply stated that merely purchasing land does not add to one's
claim of sovereignty over it. However, holding land and being able to
defend it physically does give Israel legitimate claim to it, in my book.
Btw...there is no "arab" civiliation...all the great "arab"
civilizations were either Kurdish (El Sah La Din..Saladin) Byzantine,
Greek, Roman, Persian
You're misinformed. Simply perusing the Brittanica, one will find that
there is a long history of Arabic civilizations. And what makes you
think Saladin wasn't an Arab? He was born in Tikrit, was Muslim, and
spoke Arabic. What more do you need?
He was Kurdish, which is a race of people....oh, do your own research.
Been reading a lot of arab propaganda recently have we?
If you think that Kurds are not Arabs, then you and I have different
definitions of Arabic. I consider any culture that speaks Arabic and is
Muslim to be Arabic. Perhaps you use a stricter definition, that only
the indigenous people of the Arabian peninsula are Arabic. Would English
civilization have accomplished what it did, if not for the influence of
the Romans? Anyway, you proffered the initial claim, so I won't redefine
"arab" for you.
However, you can't say that there was _no_ "arab" civilization. There
were in fact indigenous people in the Arabian peninsula, and they did
have civilization. There were many independent civilizations in that
area, all of which can be called Arabic, in the strict sense.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
14 Oct 2003 10:22:12 PM |
|
|
cory
<postmaster@hotmail.com>news:4eyib.763$915.445@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com:
If you think that Kurds are not Arabs, then you and I have different
definitions of Arabic. I consider any culture that speaks Arabic and is
Muslim to be Arabic. Perhaps you use a stricter definition, that only
the indigenous people of the Arabian peninsula are Arabic. Would English
civilization have accomplished what it did, if not for the influence of
the Romans? Anyway, you proffered the initial claim, so I won't redefine
"arab" for you.
However, you can't say that there was _no_ "arab" civilization. There
were in fact indigenous people in the Arabian peninsula, and they did
have civilization. There were many independent civilizations in that
area, all of which can be called Arabic, in the strict sense.
I speak Arabic and I like drinking coffee and watching Lawrence of Arabia.
Does that make me arab?
I don't like little boys and I don't torture animals for fun and I don't have
this burning desire to rape and kill nubile young beautiful blue eyed blonde
haired fair skinned slim and snooty and harolot upity and pridefull spawn of
the devil Israeli girls.
Insh a allah!
The "indigenous" poeple of the arabian pensisula have moved all over africa
and the middle east, but the so called people of the arabian penisula are
only noteworthy in the grand scheme of things since the 1950s and the rise of
the house of Saud. Before that they were smelly nomadic herdsmen who
liked fucking little boys, periodically went on rampages killing and raping
everything that moved including donkeys and camels and then went back to
their skin tents when rightously wrathful superior peoples like Persians,
Levantines, Turks, Englishmen or others would chase them back into the desert
and hang the few they caught.
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "cory" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
14 Oct 2003 10:42:00 PM |
|
|
Mapanari wrote:
cory
<postmaster@hotmail.com>news:4eyib.763$915.445@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com:
If you think that Kurds are not Arabs, then you and I have different
definitions of Arabic. I consider any culture that speaks Arabic and is
Muslim to be Arabic. Perhaps you use a stricter definition, that only
the indigenous people of the Arabian peninsula are Arabic. Would English
civilization have accomplished what it did, if not for the influence of
the Romans? Anyway, you proffered the initial claim, so I won't redefine
"arab" for you.
However, you can't say that there was _no_ "arab" civilization. There
were in fact indigenous people in the Arabian peninsula, and they did
have civilization. There were many independent civilizations in that
area, all of which can be called Arabic, in the strict sense.
I speak Arabic and I like drinking coffee and watching Lawrence of Arabia.
Does that make me arab?
Read my post again. You're not a culture. You're not even *cultured*.
I don't like little boys and I don't torture animals for fun and I don't have
this burning desire to rape and kill nubile young beautiful blue eyed blonde
haired fair skinned slim and snooty and harolot upity and pridefull spawn of
the devil Israeli girls.
Insh a allah!
The "indigenous" poeple of the arabian pensisula have moved all over africa
and the middle east, but the so called people of the arabian penisula are
only noteworthy in the grand scheme of things since the 1950s and the rise of
the house of Saud. Before that they were smelly nomadic herdsmen who
liked fucking little boys, periodically went on rampages killing and raping
everything that moved including donkeys and camels and then went back to
their skin tents when rightously wrathful superior peoples like Persians,
Levantines, Turks, Englishmen or others would chase them back into the desert
and hang the few they caught.
Do you know how silly you sound? When civilization was first taking root
in this region, the Europeans were still huddled in caves.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
15 Oct 2003 01:54:20 PM |
|
|
cory
<postmaster@hotmail.com>news:cm3jb.557$MM7.96@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com:
I speak Arabic and I like drinking coffee and watching Lawrence of
Arabia. Does that make me arab?
Read my post again. You're not a culture. You're not even *cultured*.
Do you know how silly you sound? When civilization was first taking root
in this region, the Europeans were still huddled in caves.
You're absoluty right. You won.
I bow to your superior education and end this thread.
EOT
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "cory" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
13 Oct 2003 09:35:42 AM |
|
|
Mapanari wrote:
You're forgetting another critical compenent....Israelis are western cultured
civilized people who can speak english and come from Europe and think, act
and behave like normal human beings and have our same superior culture.
I assume you realize that Jews are historically a Semitic people,
genetically indistinguishable from their Arabic neighbors. I assume you
also realize that Jews have adopted the methods of Western civilization
because of IMMIGRATION to Europe. What I'm guessing that you don't
realize, is that you have TOTALLY UNHINGED your arguments about white
superiority and the need for ethnic cleansing.
If a Semitic people immigrating into a white-dominated western culture
can coexist peacefully, adopt the culture, and spread it further, then
you have completely lost your argument that "meskins" or any other
non-white immigrant group must be purged. Give them time, say a few
hundred years like the Jews had, and they will have totally absorbed our
culture, and will likely have improved it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Mapanari" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
14 Oct 2003 10:36:42 PM |
|
|
cory
<postmaster@hotmail.com>news:2Lyib.75$HP5.25@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com:
Mapanari wrote:
You're forgetting another critical compenent....Israelis are western
cultured civilized people who can speak english and come from Europe
and think, act and behave like normal human beings and have our same
superior culture.
I assume you realize that Jews are historically a Semitic people,
genetically indistinguishable from their Arabic neighbors. I assume you
also realize that Jews have adopted the methods of Western civilization
because of IMMIGRATION to Europe. What I'm guessing that you don't
realize, is that you have TOTALLY UNHINGED your arguments about white
superiority and the need for ethnic cleansing.
You really don't know anything about history do you?
Hint: How long have jews been in Spain and England?
Hint #2: How many jews did Hitler kill in Germany?
Hint #3: " "" Salin """""in Russia?
All those semetic, swarthy jews, going to the gas chambers. Horrible!
Shuffling along, drinking their harsh coffee, dragging their hookahs with
them and wearing little slippers and wailing that they had to leave their
camels behind when they went into the showers.
Do you ever stop to think about what you post before you post it?
If a Semitic people immigrating into a white-dominated western culture
can coexist peacefully, adopt the culture, and spread it further, then
you have completely lost your argument that "meskins" or any other
non-white immigrant group must be purged. Give them time, say a few
hundred years like the Jews had, and they will have totally absorbed our
culture, and will likely have improved it.
You arguement is invalid becuase for the most part, jews are not semetic
peoples and haven't been so since the hagira, whenver the ***** that was,
which is debatable, but boy, dat wus a looooong time ago.
Shhh....don't look around, but those wily jews are all around you even now as
you sit at your keyboard!
Why, you can't even tell them anymore becuase they straighten that kinky
black hair and dye it, and try and marrry upstanding aryan white boys like
yourself to "pass" so there children can get into country western bars and
drink Pearl beer and do regimented military line "dancing" like a herd of
clomping buffalo jess like you!
--
-Mapi
The Mapanari of Usenet.
.
|
|
|
| User: "cory" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR in SYRIA, SOON! |
14 Oct 2003 10:52:24 PM |
|
|
Mapanari wrote:
cory
<postmaster@hotmail.com>news:2Lyib.75$HP5.25@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com:
Mapanari wrote:
You're forgetting another critical compenent....Israelis are western
cultured civilized people who can speak english and come from Europe
and think, act and behave like normal human beings and have our same
superior culture.
I assume you realize that Jews are historically a Semitic people,
genetically indistinguishable from their Arabic neighbors. I assume you
also realize that Jews have adopted the methods of Western civilization
because of IMMIGRATION to Europe. What I'm guessing that you don't
realize, is that you have TOTALLY UNHINGED your arguments about white
superiority and the need for ethnic cleansing.
You really don't know anything about history do you?
Hint: How long have jews been in Spain and England?
Hint #2: How many jews did Hitler kill in Germany?
Hint #3: " "" Salin """""in Russia?
All those semetic, swarthy jews, going to the gas chambers. Horrible!
Shuffling along, drinking their harsh coffee, dragging their hookahs with
them and wearing little slippers and wailing that they had to leave their
camels behind when they went into the showers.
Do you ever stop to think about what you post before you post it?
If a Semitic people immigrating into a white-dominated western culture
can coexist peacefully, adopt the culture, and spread it further, then
you have completely lost your argument that "meskins" or any other
non-white immigrant group must be purged. Give them time, say a few
hundred years like the Jews had, and they will have totally absorbed our
culture, and will likely have improved it.
You arguement is invalid becuase for the most part, jews are not semetic
peoples and haven't been so since the hagira, whenver the ***** that was,
which is debatable, but boy, dat wus a looooong time ago.
Shhh....don't look around, but those wily jews are all around you even now as
you sit at your keyboard!
Why, you can't even tell them anymore becuase they straighten that kinky
black hair and dye it, and try and marrry upstanding aryan white boys like
yourself to "pass" so there children can get into country western bars and
drink Pearl beer and do regimented military line "dancing" like a herd of
clomping buffalo jess like you!
It is at this point where you're simply descending into lunacy. You're
just so deluded, I can't stand it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
