| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"DGVREIMAN" |
| Date: |
25 May 2004 12:51:15 PM |
| Object: |
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
The Kerry camp (which of course has and is using the value of
hindsight) is claiming the Bush administration made mistakes in
respect to the Iraqi war aftermath.
Although the Generals (from 21 nations) in charge in Iraq say
everything is going generally as planned, and we do not need any
more troops, the Kerryites are howling that Bush made terrible
mistakes in Iraq and we need to send tens of thousands of more
troops! The Kerryites are also, unbelievably, claiming that we
should turn everything over to the United Nations regardless of
the emerging fact the United Nation's officers have been taking
bibles from Saddam for decades, and have been helping Saddam
oppress the Iraqi people in return for those bribes.
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to turn over the control of Iraq
to a known corrupt and inept entity like the so-called "United
Nations (a.k.a. "Useless Nations")?
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to almost guarantee that Iraq
will turn out to be a miserable failure by inviting the United
Nations to take control of that country? Probably for the same
reason Hanoi John Kerry traveled to Paris to work with the
Communist delegation so as to try to force the U.S. Military to
lose its war in Vietnam.
Kerry wanted the USA to lose in Vietnam and he now wants the USA
to lose in Iraq. It is clear that anything to make the Republican
party look bad, regardless of the consequences to the American
people, is the mantra and objective of Hanoi John Kerry. (Most
Americans do not know that when the American delegation showed up
to negotiate the Paris Peace Accords with the North Vietnamese
Communists to end the Vietnam war, Hanoi John Kerry had traveled
to Paris on his own and was working directly with the Communist
delegation . . . that's right - sitting directly across from
Secretary Kissinger during those negotiations were the Communist
leaders, and of course, Hanoi John Kerry sitting right next to
them helping them to win points in the Paris Peace Accords. Does
the word "traitor" come to anyone's mind?)
In respect to Iraq, it also should be noted the Brits, Aussies,
Italians, Americans and the rest of the military commanders are
directly contradicting the Kerryites in every press conference.
They say everything is going fine, on schedule, and we do not
need any more troops. I wonder, should we listen to what our
Generals and our Joint Chief's of Staff say about war, and all of
their allied Generals, or should our military commanders do what
anti-military, anti-defense, "New Left" communist types like
Hanoi John Kerry want our military to do?
Can you imagine Hanoi John Kerry leading a rifle platoon in Iraq?
How could he claim medals he did not deserve and murder innocent
people and expect to get away with it in Iraq - which are the
hallmarks of Hanoi John Kerry's entire four months of military
service in Vietnam? (Remember what Admiral Zumwalt said about
Kerry? He said; that; "he almost had to straightjacket Kerry
because he was killing so many innocent civilians," and General
Patton III said of Kerry's "military service" that; "Kerry gave
aid and comfort to the enemy!" Even all of Kerry's commanders in
Vietnam got together and said "Kerry is not fit to be a commander
in chief of the military" and if that is not enough, 85% of those
Vietnam vets Kerry was photographed within Vietnam (the
photograph Kerry has the audacity to use in his campaign
advertisements) say they support President Bush!
How about Nancy Peloso leading a squad of infantry on patrol?
Snivel, whine, cry and blubber, hell the goons will hear her
squad coming for ten miles!
Our Generals have degrees in military science and tactics. Most
of them have their PhD's, and they have been involved in Vietnam
and other wars for decades. Our Generals and Admirals study
battle tactics every day of their lives and they know in detail
all of the tiny elements contained our massive war machine, and
how to use all of those elements in concert.
In contrast, Hanoi John Kerry and Nancy Peloso are fundamentally
communists, they know only how to lie about President Bush, lie
about our war on terrorism, lie about economics, lie about lost
jobs, and of course, they also know how to be obstructionists in
respect to the interests of the American people. (They blocked
the appointment of Judges, blocked oil drilling, blocked energy
packages, blocked tax rebates, blocked anything that would help
the American people that might also simultaneously make President
Bush look good).
Most people with an IQ above 12 know that war is a fluid
undertaking. No one has a crystal ball that will tell them every
possible contingency in respect to what our enemy may or may not
do during war.
As an example, who knew in advance that Iran would be willing to
spend 100 million dollars a day to send their suicide bombers and
goons from Afghanistan and Iran into Iraq? Did Kerry or the dems
even warn about that possibility? Naw, they did not mention it
nor foresee it either . . . so why are they snipping at President
Bush for not knowing what Iran would do in advance?
The Kerryites did say we would lose 10,000 men just to take
Baghdad and we would kill 500,000 civilians in the process . . .
so I wonder, has anyone mentioned their glaring and preposterous
incorrect projections about the Iraqi war? If they are going to
criticize President Bush should they also not mention their
incredible false military projections as well? Naw, asking Kerry
not to be a hypocrite is akin to asking him to tell the truth,
don't hold your breath.
It is clear Iran is desperate to keep our troops busy while they
hurriedly finish their nuclear bomb programs. Iran is afraid that
if we have it easy in Iraq, then they will not have enough time
to build their nukes before we force the government of Iran to
surrender . . . ergo the big money and big effort to attack
coalition forces in Iraq by Syria and Iran.
Moreover, people with an IQ of 12 or higher also know that we are
not fighting Girl Scouts in the Middle East. The terrorist goons
we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan represent the filth of
the earth and the scourge of the human race. These goons are
interloping into Iraq from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, and if we
were not fighting them in Iraq we would be fighting them in
Afghanistan or somewhere else, maybes even in Ohio or Nevada.
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about. And
at least in Iraq there will be soon hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi soldiers, mercenaries and police on our side. That is why
the goons are murdering as fast as they can. They know when the
Iraqi and coalition forces unite, and it will start to happen on
June 30, 2004, that event will spell a victory for Iraq, the
Middle East in general, the USA led coalition forces, and of
course will represent yet another victory for the Bush
administration.
No wonder Kerry is lying almost as fast as the goons are
murdering. They both seem to have a mutual objective to destroy
the Bush administration. And they both seem to not care about the
unethical means they employ to try to achieve that objective.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
| User: "John Agosta" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
25 May 2004 02:33:39 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:nILsc.27165$fF3.697053@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about.
Every single rationalization for the Iraqi war has been proven to be false.
Each argument has proved to be either an outright lie, hearsay, or
exaggeration of the truth. Iraq part of the "war on terror?" Not before
we created the current mess. Maybe now, however. The SINGLE thing
Bush has done with this misadventure is make this country less secure
than it was before the war. For that alone, Bush should be put out
to pasture.
More idiotic drivel from the Bewildered Herd and it's leader, DouglASS.
Hey DouglASS, just WHO are we handing Iraq Sovereignty over to on June 30 ?
Do you know ? Does anyone know ? What a frickin joke !
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
28 May 2004 10:29:15 AM |
|
|
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
The Kerry camp (which of course has and is using the value of
hindsight) is claiming the Bush administration made mistakes in
respect to the Iraqi war aftermath.
Although the Generals (from 21 nations) in charge in Iraq say
everything is going generally as planned, and we do not need any
more troops, the Kerryites are howling that Bush made terrible
mistakes in Iraq and we need to send tens of thousands of more
troops! The Kerryites are also, unbelievably, claiming that we
should turn everything over to the United Nations regardless of
the emerging fact the United Nation's officers have been taking
bibles from Saddam for decades, and have been helping Saddam
oppress the Iraqi people in return for those bribes.
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to turn over the control of Iraq
to a known corrupt and inept entity like the so-called "United
Nations (a.k.a. "Useless Nations")?
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to almost guarantee that Iraq
will turn out to be a miserable failure by inviting the United
Nations to take control of that country? Probably for the same
reason Hanoi John Kerry traveled to Paris to work with the
Communist delegation so as to try to force the U.S. Military to
lose its war in Vietnam.
Kerry wanted the USA to lose in Vietnam and he now wants the USA
to lose in Iraq. It is clear that anything to make the Republican
party look bad, regardless of the consequences to the American
people, is the mantra and objective of Hanoi John Kerry. (Most
Americans do not know that when the American delegation showed up
to negotiate the Paris Peace Accords with the North Vietnamese
Communists to end the Vietnam war, Hanoi John Kerry had traveled
to Paris on his own and was working directly with the Communist
delegation . . . that's right - sitting directly across from
Secretary Kissinger during those negotiations were the Communist
leaders, and of course, Hanoi John Kerry sitting right next to
them helping them to win points in the Paris Peace Accords. Does
the word "traitor" come to anyone's mind?)
In respect to Iraq, it also should be noted the Brits, Aussies,
Italians, Americans and the rest of the military commanders are
directly contradicting the Kerryites in every press conference.
They say everything is going fine, on schedule, and we do not
need any more troops. I wonder, should we listen to what our
Generals and our Joint Chief's of Staff say about war, and all of
their allied Generals, or should our military commanders do what
anti-military, anti-defense, "New Left" communist types like
Hanoi John Kerry want our military to do?
Can you imagine Hanoi John Kerry leading a rifle platoon in Iraq?
How could he claim medals he did not deserve and murder innocent
people and expect to get away with it in Iraq - which are the
hallmarks of Hanoi John Kerry's entire four months of military
service in Vietnam? (Remember what Admiral Zumwalt said about
Kerry? He said; that; "he almost had to straightjacket Kerry
because he was killing so many innocent civilians," and General
Patton III said of Kerry's "military service" that; "Kerry gave
aid and comfort to the enemy!" Even all of Kerry's commanders in
Vietnam got together and said "Kerry is not fit to be a commander
in chief of the military" and if that is not enough, 85% of those
Vietnam vets Kerry was photographed within Vietnam (the
photograph Kerry has the audacity to use in his campaign
advertisements) say they support President Bush!
How about Nancy Peloso leading a squad of infantry on patrol?
Snivel, whine, cry and blubber, hell the goons will hear her
squad coming for ten miles!
Our Generals have degrees in military science and tactics. Most
of them have their PhD's, and they have been involved in Vietnam
and other wars for decades. Our Generals and Admirals study
battle tactics every day of their lives and they know in detail
all of the tiny elements contained our massive war machine, and
how to use all of those elements in concert.
In contrast, Hanoi John Kerry and Nancy Peloso are fundamentally
communists, they know only how to lie about President Bush, lie
about our war on terrorism, lie about economics, lie about lost
jobs, and of course, they also know how to be obstructionists in
respect to the interests of the American people. (They blocked
the appointment of Judges, blocked oil drilling, blocked energy
packages, blocked tax rebates, blocked anything that would help
the American people that might also simultaneously make President
Bush look good).
Most people with an IQ above 12 know that war is a fluid
undertaking. No one has a crystal ball that will tell them every
possible contingency in respect to what our enemy may or may not
do during war.
As an example, who knew in advance that Iran would be willing to
spend 100 million dollars a day to send their suicide bombers and
goons from Afghanistan and Iran into Iraq? Did Kerry or the dems
even warn about that possibility? Naw, they did not mention it
nor foresee it either . . . so why are they snipping at President
Bush for not knowing what Iran would do in advance?
The Kerryites did say we would lose 10,000 men just to take
Baghdad and we would kill 500,000 civilians in the process . . .
so I wonder, has anyone mentioned their glaring and preposterous
incorrect projections about the Iraqi war? If they are going to
criticize President Bush should they also not mention their
incredible false military projections as well? Naw, asking Kerry
not to be a hypocrite is akin to asking him to tell the truth,
don't hold your breath.
It is clear Iran is desperate to keep our troops busy while they
hurriedly finish their nuclear bomb programs. Iran is afraid that
if we have it easy in Iraq, then they will not have enough time
to build their nukes before we force the government of Iran to
surrender . . . ergo the big money and big effort to attack
coalition forces in Iraq by Syria and Iran.
Moreover, people with an IQ of 12 or higher also know that we are
not fighting Girl Scouts in the Middle East. The terrorist goons
we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan represent the filth of
the earth and the scourge of the human race. These goons are
interloping into Iraq from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, and if we
were not fighting them in Iraq we would be fighting them in
Afghanistan or somewhere else, maybes even in Ohio or Nevada.
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about. And
at least in Iraq there will be soon hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi soldiers, mercenaries and police on our side. That is why
the goons are murdering as fast as they can. They know when the
Iraqi and coalition forces unite, and it will start to happen on
June 30, 2004, that event will spell a victory for Iraq, the
Middle East in general, the USA led coalition forces, and of
course will represent yet another victory for the Bush
administration.
No wonder Kerry is lying almost as fast as the goons are
murdering. They both seem to have a mutual objective to destroy
the Bush administration. And they both seem to not care about the
unethical means they employ to try to achieve that objective.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:KJudnSoFvuwIAi7dRVn-ug@wideopenwest.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:nILsc.27165$fF3.697053@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about.
Every single rationalization for the Iraqi war has been proven
to be false.
Each argument has proved to be either an outright lie,
hearsay, or
exaggeration of the truth.
Doug Says: Now John you know what you are saying is a lie. Not
only a lie, but a flagrant idiotic lie. If you would like to
post some specifics, (which you always are afraid of doing) I
will be more than happy to prove your claims are not only false,
but reflect what is mostly wrong with the Kerry supporters - they
lie so much and so often they actually start believing their
idiotic claims.
Iraq part of the "war on terror?" Not before
we created the current mess. Maybe now, however.
Doug Says: John, duh, Saddam not only was supporting terrorism
all over the world, he had created his own suicide terrorist
organization...the Saddam Fedayeen. We all have seen the film of
the Fedayeen, replete with ski masks and suicide belts high
stepping for Saddam on parade....stop lying John, you are making
a fool out of yourself again. Of course Saddam's terrorists had
to be eliminated, and who do you think is interloping into Iraq
from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, Girl Scouts? We had to fight
them eventually John, Iraq is a much better choice for a
battlefield than Ohio, don't you think?
Also, when the goons are defeated in Iraq that defeat will send a
message to the rest of the rogue nations that support
terrorism...their days are numbered. You should send a telegram
to President Bush thanking him and PM Blair for having the
resolve to defy the corrupt UN and the goofy screaming liberals
like Kerry that want people like Saddam to remain in power at the
expense of the American people.
The SINGLE thing
Bush has done with this misadventure is make this country less
secure
than it was before the war. For that alone, Bush should be put
out
to pasture.
Doug Says: Less secure? Are you nuts? We were attacked not less
than nine times during the Clinton administration, and Clinton
did nothing substantive in return to stop terrorism. Our
Congress declared war on terrorism and declared war on Saddam
YEARS before president Bush was even elected...moron. If
President Bush and our Congress had continued to appease the
radical Muslim goons then we would have been attacked at least
five more times since 911. You need to send President Bush a
note of thanks for keeping you safe all these years.
More idiotic drivel from the Bewildered Herd and it's leader,
DouglASS.
Hey DouglASS, just WHO are we handing Iraq Sovereignty over to
on June 30 ?
Do you know ? Does anyone know ? What a frickin joke !
Doug Says: Yes I know, don't you? You should not post about a
subject unless you at least try and find out something about it
John.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Agosta" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
28 May 2004 02:43:40 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:fVItc.3778$_k3.83237@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
The Kerry camp (which of course has and is using the value of
hindsight) is claiming the Bush administration made mistakes in
respect to the Iraqi war aftermath.
Although the Generals (from 21 nations) in charge in Iraq say
everything is going generally as planned, and we do not need any
more troops, the Kerryites are howling that Bush made terrible
mistakes in Iraq and we need to send tens of thousands of more
troops! The Kerryites are also, unbelievably, claiming that we
should turn everything over to the United Nations regardless of
the emerging fact the United Nation's officers have been taking
bibles from Saddam for decades, and have been helping Saddam
oppress the Iraqi people in return for those bribes.
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to turn over the control of Iraq
to a known corrupt and inept entity like the so-called "United
Nations (a.k.a. "Useless Nations")?
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to almost guarantee that Iraq
will turn out to be a miserable failure by inviting the United
Nations to take control of that country? Probably for the same
reason Hanoi John Kerry traveled to Paris to work with the
Communist delegation so as to try to force the U.S. Military to
lose its war in Vietnam.
Kerry wanted the USA to lose in Vietnam and he now wants the USA
to lose in Iraq. It is clear that anything to make the Republican
party look bad, regardless of the consequences to the American
people, is the mantra and objective of Hanoi John Kerry. (Most
Americans do not know that when the American delegation showed up
to negotiate the Paris Peace Accords with the North Vietnamese
Communists to end the Vietnam war, Hanoi John Kerry had traveled
to Paris on his own and was working directly with the Communist
delegation . . . that's right - sitting directly across from
Secretary Kissinger during those negotiations were the Communist
leaders, and of course, Hanoi John Kerry sitting right next to
them helping them to win points in the Paris Peace Accords. Does
the word "traitor" come to anyone's mind?)
In respect to Iraq, it also should be noted the Brits, Aussies,
Italians, Americans and the rest of the military commanders are
directly contradicting the Kerryites in every press conference.
They say everything is going fine, on schedule, and we do not
need any more troops. I wonder, should we listen to what our
Generals and our Joint Chief's of Staff say about war, and all of
their allied Generals, or should our military commanders do what
anti-military, anti-defense, "New Left" communist types like
Hanoi John Kerry want our military to do?
Can you imagine Hanoi John Kerry leading a rifle platoon in Iraq?
How could he claim medals he did not deserve and murder innocent
people and expect to get away with it in Iraq - which are the
hallmarks of Hanoi John Kerry's entire four months of military
service in Vietnam? (Remember what Admiral Zumwalt said about
Kerry? He said; that; "he almost had to straightjacket Kerry
because he was killing so many innocent civilians," and General
Patton III said of Kerry's "military service" that; "Kerry gave
aid and comfort to the enemy!" Even all of Kerry's commanders in
Vietnam got together and said "Kerry is not fit to be a commander
in chief of the military" and if that is not enough, 85% of those
Vietnam vets Kerry was photographed within Vietnam (the
photograph Kerry has the audacity to use in his campaign
advertisements) say they support President Bush!
How about Nancy Peloso leading a squad of infantry on patrol?
Snivel, whine, cry and blubber, hell the goons will hear her
squad coming for ten miles!
Our Generals have degrees in military science and tactics. Most
of them have their PhD's, and they have been involved in Vietnam
and other wars for decades. Our Generals and Admirals study
battle tactics every day of their lives and they know in detail
all of the tiny elements contained our massive war machine, and
how to use all of those elements in concert.
In contrast, Hanoi John Kerry and Nancy Peloso are fundamentally
communists, they know only how to lie about President Bush, lie
about our war on terrorism, lie about economics, lie about lost
jobs, and of course, they also know how to be obstructionists in
respect to the interests of the American people. (They blocked
the appointment of Judges, blocked oil drilling, blocked energy
packages, blocked tax rebates, blocked anything that would help
the American people that might also simultaneously make President
Bush look good).
Most people with an IQ above 12 know that war is a fluid
undertaking. No one has a crystal ball that will tell them every
possible contingency in respect to what our enemy may or may not
do during war.
As an example, who knew in advance that Iran would be willing to
spend 100 million dollars a day to send their suicide bombers and
goons from Afghanistan and Iran into Iraq? Did Kerry or the dems
even warn about that possibility? Naw, they did not mention it
nor foresee it either . . . so why are they snipping at President
Bush for not knowing what Iran would do in advance?
The Kerryites did say we would lose 10,000 men just to take
Baghdad and we would kill 500,000 civilians in the process . . .
so I wonder, has anyone mentioned their glaring and preposterous
incorrect projections about the Iraqi war? If they are going to
criticize President Bush should they also not mention their
incredible false military projections as well? Naw, asking Kerry
not to be a hypocrite is akin to asking him to tell the truth,
don't hold your breath.
It is clear Iran is desperate to keep our troops busy while they
hurriedly finish their nuclear bomb programs. Iran is afraid that
if we have it easy in Iraq, then they will not have enough time
to build their nukes before we force the government of Iran to
surrender . . . ergo the big money and big effort to attack
coalition forces in Iraq by Syria and Iran.
Moreover, people with an IQ of 12 or higher also know that we are
not fighting Girl Scouts in the Middle East. The terrorist goons
we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan represent the filth of
the earth and the scourge of the human race. These goons are
interloping into Iraq from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, and if we
were not fighting them in Iraq we would be fighting them in
Afghanistan or somewhere else, maybes even in Ohio or Nevada.
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about. And
at least in Iraq there will be soon hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi soldiers, mercenaries and police on our side. That is why
the goons are murdering as fast as they can. They know when the
Iraqi and coalition forces unite, and it will start to happen on
June 30, 2004, that event will spell a victory for Iraq, the
Middle East in general, the USA led coalition forces, and of
course will represent yet another victory for the Bush
administration.
No wonder Kerry is lying almost as fast as the goons are
murdering. They both seem to have a mutual objective to destroy
the Bush administration. And they both seem to not care about the
unethical means they employ to try to achieve that objective.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:KJudnSoFvuwIAi7dRVn-ug@wideopenwest.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:nILsc.27165$fF3.697053@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about.
Every single rationalization for the Iraqi war has been proven
to be false.
Each argument has proved to be either an outright lie,
hearsay, or
exaggeration of the truth.
Doug Says: Now John you know what you are saying is a lie. Not
only a lie, but a flagrant idiotic lie. If you would like to
post some specifics, (which you always are afraid of doing) I
will be more than happy to prove your claims are not only false,
but reflect what is mostly wrong with the Kerry supporters - they
lie so much and so often they actually start believing their
idiotic claims.
Doug, it's you who is the only proven liar among us.
It's all in the record.
Iraq part of the "war on terror?" Not before
we created the current mess. Maybe now, however.
Doug Says: John, duh, Saddam not only was supporting terrorism
all over the world, he had created his own suicide terrorist
organization...the Saddam Fedayeen. We all have seen the film of
the Fedayeen, replete with ski masks and suicide belts high
stepping for Saddam on parade....stop lying John, you are making
a fool out of yourself again. Of course Saddam's terrorists had
to be eliminated, and who do you think is interloping into Iraq
from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, Girl Scouts? We had to fight
them eventually John, Iraq is a much better choice for a
battlefield than Ohio, don't you think?
All Bush did was creat a haven for terrorists in a place that
was no threat to us. You suck up the lies like an alchoholic sucks up the
booze.
Also, when the goons are defeated in Iraq that defeat will send a
message to the rest of the rogue nations that support
terrorism...their days are numbered. You should send a telegram
to President Bush thanking him and PM Blair for having the
resolve to defy the corrupt UN and the goofy screaming liberals
like Kerry that want people like Saddam to remain in power at the
expense of the American people.
The SINGLE thing
Bush has done with this misadventure is make this country less
secure
than it was before the war. For that alone, Bush should be put
out
to pasture.
Doug Says: Less secure? Are you nuts? We were attacked not less
than nine times during the Clinton administration, and Clinton
did nothing substantive in return to stop terrorism. Our
Congress declared war on terrorism and declared war on Saddam
YEARS before president Bush was even elected...moron. If
President Bush and our Congress had continued to appease the
radical Muslim goons then we would have been attacked at least
five more times since 911. You need to send President Bush a
note of thanks for keeping you safe all these years.
More idiotic drivel from the Bewildered Herd and it's leader,
DouglASS.
Hey DouglASS, just WHO are we handing Iraq Sovereignty over to
on June 30 ?
Do you know ? Does anyone know ? What a frickin joke !
Doug Says: Yes I know, don't you? You should not post about a
subject unless you at least try and find out something about it
John.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Who then, DouglASS ?
Because Bush sure didn't have a clue in his speech.
Unless you can cite in his speech just who the hell he is talking about.
You've just proved how much of a liar you are, on the record, one more time.
Neither you nor Bush have a clue as to what is going on in Iraq,
and the only reason Bush insists on a June 30 "hand over" date
is because he wants to divest himself of the mess he has created.
He doesn't even know who will be assuming leadership, for heaven's sake,
and he expects us to buy it ? You're a moron for accepting this man's
baloney.
What is he planning on doing, DouglASS ?
Going door to door selling raffle coupons?
The grand prize being new Iraqi President?
I can see it now: "The more you buy, the better chance you have of
winning."
How many books do you plan on buying?
You've already bought everything else this moron is selling you.
DOLT !
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "John Agosta" |
|
| Title: DOUG LIES - was Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
30 May 2004 11:11:52 AM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:fVItc.3778$_k3.83237@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
Hey DouglASS, just WHO are we handing Iraq Sovereignty over to
on June 30 ?
Do you know ? Does anyone know ? What a frickin joke !
Doug Says: Yes I know, don't you? You should not post about a
subject unless you at least try and find out something about it
John.
Ok Doug, tell us !
Let us all in on your secret !!!
You lying *****.
.
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Transfer of Power In Iraq (was Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
01 Jun 2004 09:24:20 AM |
|
|
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:X6ednQ-h-PlXmifdRVn-tw@wideopenwest.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:fVItc.3778$_k3.83237@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
Hey DouglASS, just WHO are we handing Iraq Sovereignty over
to
on June 30 ?
Do you know ? Does anyone know ? What a frickin joke !
Doug Says: Yes I know, don't you? You should not post about
a
subject unless you at least try and find out something about
it
John.
Ok Doug, tell us !
Let us all in on your secret !!!
You lying *****.
Doug Says: "Lying *****?" HAHAHAHHAHAHA...You are going off the
deep end John. In fact just today the Iraqi Provisional Council
resigned so the new Iraqi Government can prepare to take over.
They have agreed to a Constitution, and it DOES NOT allow your
chums the radical Muslims to run the country.
The USA led coalition forces will be backing up the new 400,000
man Iraqi Army and Police force. It seems the USA just gained a
new ally, one that is committing 400,000 troops to the
reconstruction of Iraq....now *that's* an ally! I wonder how
many troops the French would have provided? Six, seven perhaps?
President Bush has managed to not only eliminate Saddam, he has
already built a new nation that not only will support America and
Israel, it will help the American troops kill goons as well!
The Bush administration obviously had this Iraqi liberation and
reconstruction well-planned almost to a degree it will go down in
American history as perhaps the most successful military
enterprise ever.
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Agosta" |
|
| Title: Re: Transfer of Power In Iraq (was Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
01 Jun 2004 10:19:50 AM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:ok0vc.108897$hH.1909729@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
"John Agosta" <j_agosta@remove_wideopenwest.kom> wrote in message
news:X6ednQ-h-PlXmifdRVn-tw@wideopenwest.com...
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:fVItc.3778$_k3.83237@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
Hey DouglASS, just WHO are we handing Iraq Sovereignty over
to
on June 30 ?
Do you know ? Does anyone know ? What a frickin joke !
Doug Says: Yes I know, don't you? You should not post about
a
subject unless you at least try and find out something about
it
John.
Ok Doug, tell us !
Let us all in on your secret !!!
You lying *****.
Doug Says: "Lying *****?" HAHAHAHHAHAHA...You are going off the
deep end John. In fact just today the Iraqi Provisional Council
resigned so the new Iraqi Government can prepare to take over.
They have agreed to a Constitution, and it DOES NOT allow your
chums the radical Muslims to run the country.
The USA led coalition forces will be backing up the new 400,000
man Iraqi Army and Police force. It seems the USA just gained a
new ally, one that is committing 400,000 troops to the
reconstruction of Iraq....now *that's* an ally! I wonder how
many troops the French would have provided? Six, seven perhaps?
President Bush has managed to not only eliminate Saddam, he has
already built a new nation that not only will support America and
Israel, it will help the American troops kill goons as well!
The Bush administration obviously had this Iraqi liberation and
reconstruction well-planned almost to a degree it will go down in
American history as perhaps the most successful military
enterprise ever.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Not hardly going off the deep end.
You say you 'know' who will be assuming control.
The fact is, no one knows.
You were directly challenged to tell us all WHO will be running the show in
Iraq,
but you can not do this, because neither Bush nor any one else - including
YOU
has an answer !
So, more proof that you lie. Unless you can back up your statement that you
made on 5/28/2004
JA says:
"> Hey DouglASS, just WHO are we handing Iraq Sovereignty over to
on June 30 ?
Do you know ? Does anyone know ? What a frickin joke !
Doug Says: Yes I know, don't you? "
So Who Dougie? Just who is it ?
Like the coward you are, you will either: ignore the challenge to back up
your own words,
try to change the subject entirely, or try to change what you said when you
said it.
You will evade answering the question until, someday, there actually is a
person with a name and face
running the show. Then, you will tell us who the guy is. Then you will try
to say "See? I knew all the time!"
You lie so often, we can see the ones coming around the corner that you
haven't even made up yet.
So, yeah. Lying *****.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "abracadabra" |
|
| Title: Re: Doug, go eat a crow. |
25 May 2004 10:09:18 PM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:nILsc.27165$fF3.697053@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
The Kerry camp (which of course has and is using the value of
hindsight) is claiming the Bush administration made mistakes in
respect to the Iraqi war aftermath.
Nope
Plenty of people said BEFORE THE WAR STARTED that it was a bad idea.
The war has now been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have been a bad
idea.
The planning for the war was poor. The execution of the occupation has been
a disaster.
It's not "with hindsight" that we say these things - many of us oppsed the
war all along, and we have been proven right.
Go eat your crow.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "In The Darkness" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
25 May 2004 03:45:48 PM |
|
|
The shill is back at work...
How is it going Doug ?
Isn't it nice to collect a paycheck, and all
you have to do is lie and distort for your master ?
DGVREIMAN wrote:
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
The Kerry camp (which of course has and is using the value of
hindsight) is claiming the Bush administration made mistakes in
respect to the Iraqi war aftermath.
Although the Generals (from 21 nations) in charge in Iraq say
everything is going generally as planned,
So, tell that to Berg.
and we do not need any
more troops, the Kerryites are howling that Bush made terrible
mistakes in Iraq and we need to send tens of thousands of more
troops! The Kerryites are also, unbelievably, claiming that we
should turn everything over to the United Nations regardless of
the emerging fact the United Nation's officers have been taking
bibles from Saddam for decades, and have been helping Saddam
oppress the Iraqi people in return for those bribes.
Lets see, turn it over to the UN, or turn it over to an
Iraqi ad hoc Regime....
I can kind of see his point.
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to turn over the control of Iraq
to a known corrupt and inept entity like the so-called "United
Nations (a.k.a. "Useless Nations")?
They have _nothing_ on the Iraqi regimes corruption...
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to almost guarantee that Iraq
will turn out to be a miserable failure by inviting the United
Nations to take control of that country? Probably for the same
reason Hanoi John Kerry traveled to Paris to work with the
Communist delegation so as to try to force the U.S. Military to
lose its war in Vietnam.
Oh, so now we lost Vietnam....
My, how you contradict yourself.
Kerry wanted the USA to lose in Vietnam and he now wants the USA
to lose in Iraq. It is clear that anything to make the Republican
party look bad, regardless of the consequences to the American
people, is the mantra and objective of Hanoi John Kerry. (Most
Americans do not know that when the American delegation showed up
to negotiate the Paris Peace Accords with the North Vietnamese
Communists to end the Vietnam war, Hanoi John Kerry had traveled
to Paris on his own and was working directly with the Communist
delegation . . . that's right - sitting directly across from
Secretary Kissinger during those negotiations were the Communist
leaders, and of course, Hanoi John Kerry sitting right next to
them helping them to win points in the Paris Peace Accords. Does
the word "traitor" come to anyone's mind?)
Did you know that Kerry was in Paris on his Honeymoon,
he didn't go there just to meet these people.
And, BTW, that "traitor" actually fought in that war, while
the "W" was downing six packs, and snorting coke off under
age girls belly's....
In respect to Iraq, it also should be noted the Brits, Aussies,
Italians, Americans and the rest of the military commanders are
directly contradicting the Kerryites in every press conference.
They say everything is going fine, on schedule, and we do not
need any more troops. I wonder, should we listen to what our
Generals and our Joint Chief's of Staff say about war, and all of
their allied Generals, or should our military commanders do what
anti-military, anti-defense, "New Left" communist types like
Hanoi John Kerry want our military to do?
Yeah, after all, we listened to them with respect the
"imminent WMD's deployable in 45 minutes".
And what a _great_ plan they had
for Iraq after they liberated it...
Can you imagine Hanoi John Kerry leading a rifle platoon in Iraq?
How about "W" ?
The man has _never_ seen action, other than under age girls
on drugs, that is....
What was it he called his "little problem", a womb ***** ?
How could he claim medals he did not deserve and murder innocent
people and expect to get away with it in Iraq - which are the
hallmarks of Hanoi John Kerry's entire four months of military
service in Vietnam? (Remember what Admiral Zumwalt said about
Kerry? He said; that; "he almost had to straightjacket Kerry
because he was killing so many innocent civilians," and General
Patton III said of Kerry's "military service" that; "Kerry gave
aid and comfort to the enemy!" Even all of Kerry's commanders in
Vietnam got together and said "Kerry is not fit to be a commander
in chief of the military" and if that is not enough, 85% of those
Vietnam vets Kerry was photographed within Vietnam (the
photograph Kerry has the audacity to use in his campaign
advertisements) say they support President Bush!
People who support Bush, are about as trustworthy as Bush.
I think _that_ says it all.
How about Nancy Peloso leading a squad of infantry on patrol?
Snivel, whine, cry and blubber, hell the goons will hear her
squad coming for ten miles!
How about "W" ?
"Now, (hic), you guys go on up ahead, I'll hang here
in the back......"
"Hey guys, where did "W" go ?"
"I don't know Sarge, but I found his medical records...."
Our Generals have degrees in military science and tactics. Most
of them have their PhD's, and they have been involved in Vietnam
and other wars for decades. Our Generals and Admirals study
battle tactics every day of their lives and they know in detail
all of the tiny elements contained our massive war machine, and
how to use all of those elements in concert.
And they _still_ screwed the pooch in Iraq, huh ?
In contrast, Hanoi John Kerry and Nancy Peloso are fundamentally
communists, they know only how to lie about President Bush, lie
about our war on terrorism, lie about economics, lie about lost
jobs, and of course, they also know how to be obstructionists in
respect to the interests of the American people. (They blocked
the appointment of Judges, blocked oil drilling, blocked energy
packages, blocked tax rebates, blocked anything that would help
the American people that might also simultaneously make President
Bush look good).
Sure they did... I saw them block some of the most corrupt
bills that have ever been entered into the American Congress...
Next thing you will accuse them of being polluters because
they blocked the clear sky initiative....
The catch with these Bills Dougie, they are misnomered
deceptive legislation, often doing the exact opposite
of what they claim to do...
Just like "Clear Skies".
And with respect to lies ?
Your Con in Chief just had his _intentional_ lies and propaganda
declared _ILLEGAL_....
Yes, just like Hitler, "W" was creating fake news reports that
were really propaganda, for his Medicare Con^^^Bill.
http://www.hillnews.com/news/052004/medicare.aspx
"The investigative arm of Congress has found that parts of a
Bush administration video explaining changes to Medicare violate
the government ban on publicity and propaganda."
Bush not only lies, he uses the Government Machine to lie.
Now, about that traitor word.... looking pretty much like
projection, to me.....
Most people with an IQ above 12 know that war is a fluid
undertaking. No one has a crystal ball that will tell them every
possible contingency in respect to what our enemy may or may not
do during war.
As an example, who knew in advance that Iran would be willing to
spend 100 million dollars a day to send their suicide bombers and
goons from Afghanistan and Iran into Iraq? Did Kerry or the dems
even warn about that possibility? Naw, they did not mention it
nor foresee it either . . . so why are they snipping at President
Bush for not knowing what Iran would do in advance?
So, you are not claiming that Iran is the basis for the Iraqi
resistance ?
The same Iran you claimed we would be in a all out nuclear
war with, in under 10 years ?
The Kerryites did say we would lose 10,000 men just to take
Baghdad and we would kill 500,000 civilians in the process . . .
so I wonder, has anyone mentioned their glaring and preposterous
incorrect projections about the Iraqi war? If they are going to
criticize President Bush should they also not mention their
incredible false military projections as well? Naw, asking Kerry
not to be a hypocrite is akin to asking him to tell the truth,
don't hold your breath.
Well, you are right about one thing... we didn't lose as
many as expected. On the other hand, we haven't exactly beaten
them yet.... just chased them into hiding, and into using
guerilla techniques.
It is clear Iran is desperate to keep our troops busy while they
hurriedly finish their nuclear bomb programs. Iran is afraid that
if we have it easy in Iraq, then they will not have enough time
to build their nukes before we force the government of Iran to
surrender . . . ergo the big money and big effort to attack
coalition forces in Iraq by Syria and Iran.
Oh, now here comes the Iran Nuke thing....
You also implicated Saudi's in your last propaganda post,
what happened, they resign or something ? Oh, that's
right, the Bush-Saudi connection is exposed, now , suddenly
they are our friends.
Moreover, people with an IQ of 12 or higher also know that we are
not fighting Girl Scouts in the Middle East. The terrorist goons
we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan represent the filth of
the earth and the scourge of the human race. These goons are
interloping into Iraq from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, and if we
were not fighting them in Iraq we would be fighting them in
Afghanistan or somewhere else, maybes even in Ohio or Nevada.
No, these are people trying to protect their _own_ land, not
standard Al Quaida fundamental loons....
They may be scum, but you aren't going to see them on our
soil. An Al Quaida cell, maybe, but not them.
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about.
No, that was Al Quaida, Iraq wasn't implicated in any way.
More Ari Fleishers "Saddam Bin Laden", fallacy.
And
at least in Iraq there will be soon hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi soldiers, mercenaries and police on our side. That is why
the goons are murdering as fast as they can. They know when the
Iraqi and coalition forces unite, and it will start to happen on
June 30, 2004, that event will spell a victory for Iraq, the
Middle East in general, the USA led coalition forces, and of
course will represent yet another victory for the Bush
administration.
You make it sounds sucesfull, instead of the royal fuckup
it has been... and the economy is going great too...
Suuuuuure it is Doug, Suuuuure.
No wonder Kerry is lying almost as fast as the goons are
murdering. They both seem to have a mutual objective to destroy
the Bush administration. And they both seem to not care about the
unethical means they employ to try to achieve that objective.
Speaking of Unethical, how much you getting for lying to
your own country, Doug (Tm) , Hrmmmm ?
"Tokyo" Doug ?
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "What War?" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
25 May 2004 04:43:48 PM |
|
|
Reading your reichwing post is a work in progress.
You sainted republicunts are losing losing losing.
"In The Darkness" <north@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:c90bj0$6t2$1@news.onecall.net...
The shill is back at work...
How is it going Doug ?
Isn't it nice to collect a paycheck, and all
you have to do is lie and distort for your master ?
DGVREIMAN wrote:
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
The Kerry camp (which of course has and is using the value of
hindsight) is claiming the Bush administration made mistakes in
respect to the Iraqi war aftermath.
Although the Generals (from 21 nations) in charge in Iraq say
everything is going generally as planned,
So, tell that to Berg.
and we do not need any
more troops, the Kerryites are howling that Bush made terrible
mistakes in Iraq and we need to send tens of thousands of more
troops! The Kerryites are also, unbelievably, claiming that we
should turn everything over to the United Nations regardless of
the emerging fact the United Nation's officers have been taking
bibles from Saddam for decades, and have been helping Saddam
oppress the Iraqi people in return for those bribes.
Lets see, turn it over to the UN, or turn it over to an
Iraqi ad hoc Regime....
I can kind of see his point.
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to turn over the control of Iraq
to a known corrupt and inept entity like the so-called "United
Nations (a.k.a. "Useless Nations")?
They have _nothing_ on the Iraqi regimes corruption...
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to almost guarantee that Iraq
will turn out to be a miserable failure by inviting the United
Nations to take control of that country? Probably for the same
reason Hanoi John Kerry traveled to Paris to work with the
Communist delegation so as to try to force the U.S. Military to
lose its war in Vietnam.
Oh, so now we lost Vietnam....
My, how you contradict yourself.
Kerry wanted the USA to lose in Vietnam and he now wants the USA
to lose in Iraq. It is clear that anything to make the Republican
party look bad, regardless of the consequences to the American
people, is the mantra and objective of Hanoi John Kerry. (Most
Americans do not know that when the American delegation showed up
to negotiate the Paris Peace Accords with the North Vietnamese
Communists to end the Vietnam war, Hanoi John Kerry had traveled
to Paris on his own and was working directly with the Communist
delegation . . . that's right - sitting directly across from
Secretary Kissinger during those negotiations were the Communist
leaders, and of course, Hanoi John Kerry sitting right next to
them helping them to win points in the Paris Peace Accords. Does
the word "traitor" come to anyone's mind?)
Did you know that Kerry was in Paris on his Honeymoon,
he didn't go there just to meet these people.
And, BTW, that "traitor" actually fought in that war, while
the "W" was downing six packs, and snorting coke off under
age girls belly's....
In respect to Iraq, it also should be noted the Brits, Aussies,
Italians, Americans and the rest of the military commanders are
directly contradicting the Kerryites in every press conference.
They say everything is going fine, on schedule, and we do not
need any more troops. I wonder, should we listen to what our
Generals and our Joint Chief's of Staff say about war, and all of
their allied Generals, or should our military commanders do what
anti-military, anti-defense, "New Left" communist types like
Hanoi John Kerry want our military to do?
Yeah, after all, we listened to them with respect the
"imminent WMD's deployable in 45 minutes".
And what a _great_ plan they had
for Iraq after they liberated it...
Can you imagine Hanoi John Kerry leading a rifle platoon in Iraq?
How about "W" ?
The man has _never_ seen action, other than under age girls
on drugs, that is....
What was it he called his "little problem", a womb ***** ?
How could he claim medals he did not deserve and murder innocent
people and expect to get away with it in Iraq - which are the
hallmarks of Hanoi John Kerry's entire four months of military
service in Vietnam? (Remember what Admiral Zumwalt said about
Kerry? He said; that; "he almost had to straightjacket Kerry
because he was killing so many innocent civilians," and General
Patton III said of Kerry's "military service" that; "Kerry gave
aid and comfort to the enemy!" Even all of Kerry's commanders in
Vietnam got together and said "Kerry is not fit to be a commander
in chief of the military" and if that is not enough, 85% of those
Vietnam vets Kerry was photographed within Vietnam (the
photograph Kerry has the audacity to use in his campaign
advertisements) say they support President Bush!
People who support Bush, are about as trustworthy as Bush.
I think _that_ says it all.
How about Nancy Peloso leading a squad of infantry on patrol?
Snivel, whine, cry and blubber, hell the goons will hear her
squad coming for ten miles!
How about "W" ?
"Now, (hic), you guys go on up ahead, I'll hang here
in the back......"
"Hey guys, where did "W" go ?"
"I don't know Sarge, but I found his medical records...."
Our Generals have degrees in military science and tactics. Most
of them have their PhD's, and they have been involved in Vietnam
and other wars for decades. Our Generals and Admirals study
battle tactics every day of their lives and they know in detail
all of the tiny elements contained our massive war machine, and
how to use all of those elements in concert.
And they _still_ screwed the pooch in Iraq, huh ?
In contrast, Hanoi John Kerry and Nancy Peloso are fundamentally
communists, they know only how to lie about President Bush, lie
about our war on terrorism, lie about economics, lie about lost
jobs, and of course, they also know how to be obstructionists in
respect to the interests of the American people. (They blocked
the appointment of Judges, blocked oil drilling, blocked energy
packages, blocked tax rebates, blocked anything that would help
the American people that might also simultaneously make President
Bush look good).
Sure they did... I saw them block some of the most corrupt
bills that have ever been entered into the American Congress...
Next thing you will accuse them of being polluters because
they blocked the clear sky initiative....
The catch with these Bills Dougie, they are misnomered
deceptive legislation, often doing the exact opposite
of what they claim to do...
Just like "Clear Skies".
And with respect to lies ?
Your Con in Chief just had his _intentional_ lies and propaganda
declared _ILLEGAL_....
Yes, just like Hitler, "W" was creating fake news reports that
were really propaganda, for his Medicare Con^^^Bill.
http://www.hillnews.com/news/052004/medicare.aspx
"The investigative arm of Congress has found that parts of a
Bush administration video explaining changes to Medicare violate
the government ban on publicity and propaganda."
Bush not only lies, he uses the Government Machine to lie.
Now, about that traitor word.... looking pretty much like
projection, to me.....
Most people with an IQ above 12 know that war is a fluid
undertaking. No one has a crystal ball that will tell them every
possible contingency in respect to what our enemy may or may not
do during war.
As an example, who knew in advance that Iran would be willing to
spend 100 million dollars a day to send their suicide bombers and
goons from Afghanistan and Iran into Iraq? Did Kerry or the dems
even warn about that possibility? Naw, they did not mention it
nor foresee it either . . . so why are they snipping at President
Bush for not knowing what Iran would do in advance?
So, you are not claiming that Iran is the basis for the Iraqi
resistance ?
The same Iran you claimed we would be in a all out nuclear
war with, in under 10 years ?
The Kerryites did say we would lose 10,000 men just to take
Baghdad and we would kill 500,000 civilians in the process . . .
so I wonder, has anyone mentioned their glaring and preposterous
incorrect projections about the Iraqi war? If they are going to
criticize President Bush should they also not mention their
incredible false military projections as well? Naw, asking Kerry
not to be a hypocrite is akin to asking him to tell the truth,
don't hold your breath.
Well, you are right about one thing... we didn't lose as
many as expected. On the other hand, we haven't exactly beaten
them yet.... just chased them into hiding, and into using
guerilla techniques.
It is clear Iran is desperate to keep our troops busy while they
hurriedly finish their nuclear bomb programs. Iran is afraid that
if we have it easy in Iraq, then they will not have enough time
to build their nukes before we force the government of Iran to
surrender . . . ergo the big money and big effort to attack
coalition forces in Iraq by Syria and Iran.
Oh, now here comes the Iran Nuke thing....
You also implicated Saudi's in your last propaganda post,
what happened, they resign or something ? Oh, that's
right, the Bush-Saudi connection is exposed, now , suddenly
they are our friends.
Moreover, people with an IQ of 12 or higher also know that we are
not fighting Girl Scouts in the Middle East. The terrorist goons
we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan represent the filth of
the earth and the scourge of the human race. These goons are
interloping into Iraq from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, and if we
were not fighting them in Iraq we would be fighting them in
Afghanistan or somewhere else, maybes even in Ohio or Nevada.
No, these are people trying to protect their _own_ land, not
standard Al Quaida fundamental loons....
They may be scum, but you aren't going to see them on our
soil. An Al Quaida cell, maybe, but not them.
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about.
No, that was Al Quaida, Iraq wasn't implicated in any way.
More Ari Fleishers "Saddam Bin Laden", fallacy.
And
at least in Iraq there will be soon hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi soldiers, mercenaries and police on our side. That is why
the goons are murdering as fast as they can. They know when the
Iraqi and coalition forces unite, and it will start to happen on
June 30, 2004, that event will spell a victory for Iraq, the
Middle East in general, the USA led coalition forces, and of
course will represent yet another victory for the Bush
administration.
You make it sounds sucesfull, instead of the royal fuckup
it has been... and the economy is going great too...
Suuuuuure it is Doug, Suuuuure.
No wonder Kerry is lying almost as fast as the goons are
murdering. They both seem to have a mutual objective to destroy
the Bush administration. And they both seem to not care about the
unethical means they employ to try to achieve that objective.
Speaking of Unethical, how much you getting for lying to
your own country, Doug (Tm) , Hrmmmm ?
"Tokyo" Doug ?
Doug Grant (Tm)
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.690 / Virus Database: 451 - Release Date: 5/22/2004
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "DGVREIMAN" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
28 May 2004 11:14:53 AM |
|
|
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
The Kerry camp (which of course has and is using the value of
hindsight) is claiming the Bush administration made mistakes in
respect to the Iraqi war aftermath.
Although the Generals (from 21 nations) in charge in Iraq say
everything is going generally as planned, and we do not need any
more troops, the Kerryites are howling that Bush made terrible
mistakes in Iraq and we need to send tens of thousands of more
troops! The Kerryites are also, unbelievably, claiming that we
should turn everything over to the United Nations regardless of
the emerging fact the United Nation's officers have been taking
bibles from Saddam for decades, and have been helping Saddam
oppress the Iraqi people in return for those bribes.
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to turn over the control of Iraq
to a known corrupt and inept entity like the so-called "United
Nations (a.k.a. "Useless Nations")?
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to almost guarantee that Iraq
will turn out to be a miserable failure by inviting the United
Nations to take control of that country? Probably for the same
reason Hanoi John Kerry traveled to Paris to work with the
Communist delegation so as to try to force the U.S. Military to
lose its war in Vietnam.
Kerry wanted the USA to lose in Vietnam and he now wants the USA
to lose in Iraq. It is clear that anything to make the Republican
party look bad, regardless of the consequences to the American
people, is the mantra and objective of Hanoi John Kerry. (Most
Americans do not know that when the American delegation showed up
to negotiate the Paris Peace Accords with the North Vietnamese
Communists to end the Vietnam war, Hanoi John Kerry had traveled
to Paris on his own and was working directly with the Communist
delegation . . . that's right - sitting directly across from
Secretary Kissinger during those negotiations were the Communist
leaders, and of course, Hanoi John Kerry sitting right next to
them helping them to win points in the Paris Peace Accords. Does
the word "traitor" come to anyone's mind?)
In respect to Iraq, it also should be noted the Brits, Aussies,
Italians, Americans and the rest of the military commanders are
directly contradicting the Kerryites in every press conference.
They say everything is going fine, on schedule, and we do not
need any more troops. I wonder, should we listen to what our
Generals and our Joint Chief's of Staff say about war, and all of
their allied Generals, or should our military commanders do what
anti-military, anti-defense, "New Left" communist types like
Hanoi John Kerry want our military to do?
Can you imagine Hanoi John Kerry leading a rifle platoon in Iraq?
How could he claim medals he did not deserve and murder innocent
people and expect to get away with it in Iraq - which are the
hallmarks of Hanoi John Kerry's entire four months of military
service in Vietnam? (Remember what Admiral Zumwalt said about
Kerry? He said; that; "he almost had to straightjacket Kerry
because he was killing so many innocent civilians," and General
Patton III said of Kerry's "military service" that; "Kerry gave
aid and comfort to the enemy!" Even all of Kerry's commanders in
Vietnam got together and said "Kerry is not fit to be a commander
in chief of the military" and if that is not enough, 85% of those
Vietnam vets Kerry was photographed within Vietnam (the
photograph Kerry has the audacity to use in his campaign
advertisements) say they support President Bush!
How about Nancy Peloso leading a squad of infantry on patrol?
Snivel, whine, cry and blubber, hell the goons will hear her
squad coming for ten miles!
Our Generals have degrees in military science and tactics. Most
of them have their PhD's, and they have been involved in Vietnam
and other wars for decades. Our Generals and Admirals study
battle tactics every day of their lives and they know in detail
all of the tiny elements contained our massive war machine, and
how to use all of those elements in concert.
In contrast, Hanoi John Kerry and Nancy Peloso are fundamentally
communists, they know only how to lie about President Bush, lie
about our war on terrorism, lie about economics, lie about lost
jobs, and of course, they also know how to be obstructionists in
respect to the interests of the American people. (They blocked
the appointment of Judges, blocked oil drilling, blocked energy
packages, blocked tax rebates, blocked anything that would help
the American people that might also simultaneously make President
Bush look good).
Most people with an IQ above 12 know that war is a fluid
undertaking. No one has a crystal ball that will tell them every
possible contingency in respect to what our enemy may or may not
do during war.
As an example, who knew in advance that Iran would be willing to
spend 100 million dollars a day to send their suicide bombers and
goons from Afghanistan and Iran into Iraq? Did Kerry or the dems
even warn about that possibility? Naw, they did not mention it
nor foresee it either . . . so why are they snipping at President
Bush for not knowing what Iran would do in advance?
The Kerryites did say we would lose 10,000 men just to take
Baghdad and we would kill 500,000 civilians in the process . . .
so I wonder, has anyone mentioned their glaring and preposterous
incorrect projections about the Iraqi war? If they are going to
criticize President Bush should they also not mention their
incredible false military projections as well? Naw, asking Kerry
not to be a hypocrite is akin to asking him to tell the truth,
don't hold your breath.
It is clear Iran is desperate to keep our troops busy while they
hurriedly finish their nuclear bomb programs. Iran is afraid that
if we have it easy in Iraq, then they will not have enough time
to build their nukes before we force the government of Iran to
surrender . . . ergo the big money and big effort to attack
coalition forces in Iraq by Syria and Iran.
Moreover, people with an IQ of 12 or higher also know that we are
not fighting Girl Scouts in the Middle East. The terrorist goons
we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan represent the filth of
the earth and the scourge of the human race. These goons are
interloping into Iraq from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, and if we
were not fighting them in Iraq we would be fighting them in
Afghanistan or somewhere else, maybes even in Ohio or Nevada.
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about. And
at least in Iraq there will be soon hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi soldiers, mercenaries and police on our side. That is why
the goons are murdering as fast as they can. They know when the
Iraqi and coalition forces unite, and it will start to happen on
June 30, 2004, that event will spell a victory for Iraq, the
Middle East in general, the USA led coalition forces, and of
course will represent yet another victory for the Bush
administration.
No wonder Kerry is lying almost as fast as the goons are
murdering. They both seem to have a mutual objective to destroy
the Bush administration. And they both seem to not care about the
unethical means they employ to try to achieve that objective.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"In The Darkness" <north@onecall.net> wrote in message
news:c90bj0$6t2$1@news.onecall.net...
The shill is back at work...
How is it going Doug ?
Isn't it nice to collect a paycheck, and all
you have to do is lie and distort for your master ?
Doug Says: Be specific if you wish to attack me, only you know
what the hell you are talking about above dummy.
DGVREIMAN wrote:
WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS
The Kerry camp (which of course has and is using the value of
hindsight) is claiming the Bush administration made mistakes
in
respect to the Iraqi war aftermath.
Although the Generals (from 21 nations) in charge in Iraq say
everything is going generally as planned,
So, tell that to Berg.
Doug Says: The murder of Mr. Berg has nothing to do with more
troops moron. Stay focused on the subject.
and we do not need any
more troops, the Kerryites are howling that Bush made
terrible
mistakes in Iraq and we need to send tens of thousands of
more
troops! The Kerryites are also, unbelievably, claiming that
we
should turn everything over to the United Nations regardless
of
the emerging fact the United Nation's officers have been
taking
bibles from Saddam for decades, and have been helping Saddam
oppress the Iraqi people in return for those bribes.
Lets see, turn it over to the UN, or turn it over to an
Iraqi ad hoc Regime....
I can kind of see his point.
Doug Says: The UN is corrupt, and will get thousands of Iraqis
killed (unless they bribe the UN officers of course) and this is
Kerry's solution?
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to turn over the control of
Iraq
to a known corrupt and inept entity like the so-called
"United
Nations (a.k.a. "Useless Nations")?
They have _nothing_ on the Iraqi regimes corruption...
Doug Says: Really? Please provide us with some basis for that
idiotic claim. The UN has admitted their corruption.
Why would Hanoi John Kerry want to almost guarantee that Iraq
will turn out to be a miserable failure by inviting the
United
Nations to take control of that country? Probably for the
same
reason Hanoi John Kerry traveled to Paris to work with the
Communist delegation so as to try to force the U.S. Military
to
lose its war in Vietnam.
Oh, so now we lost Vietnam....
My, how you contradict yourself.
Doug Says: Dummy, read my paragraph again - the key word is
'TRY" - Kerry worked with the communists to help them kill
American GI's and he worked with them to try to get their "nine
points" into the Paris Peace Accords. Kerry failed, as usual.
But that does not discount the fact that Kerry turned his coat
and actually sat on the side of the Communists negotiators and
he advised them in respect to how they could kill more Americans.
So now, the Kerry moveon.org website is advertising for "foreign
money" which of course is coming from terrorists, and Kerry wants
to be the "Commander in Chief" of the men he tried so hard to get
killed during the Vietnam war, and will get killed if he is
elected with all that terrorist support, yet you do not find this
travesty important?
Kerry wanted the USA to lose in Vietnam and he now wants the
USA
to lose in Iraq. It is clear that anything to make the
Republican
party look bad, regardless of the consequences to the
American
people, is the mantra and objective of Hanoi John Kerry.
(Most
Americans do not know that when the American delegation
showed up
to negotiate the Paris Peace Accords with the North
Vietnamese
Communists to end the Vietnam war, Hanoi John Kerry had
traveled
to Paris on his own and was working directly with the
Communist
delegation . . . that's right - sitting directly across from
Secretary Kissinger during those negotiations were the
Communist
leaders, and of course, Hanoi John Kerry sitting right next
to
them helping them to win points in the Paris Peace Accords.
Does
the word "traitor" come to anyone's mind?)
Did you know that Kerry was in Paris on his Honeymoon,
he didn't go there just to meet these people.
Doug Says: HAHAHHAHAHA! So when Kerry was sitting at the table
on the Communist side, day in and day out, trying his best to get
American GI's killed, and trying his best to get the communist
points inserted into the Paris Peace Accords, that was a
"honeymoon" and not the traitorous act we all know it was? Is
this the latest lie coming from the Kerry camp? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Please show us where Kerry made that claim. I have so much
evidence to the contrary I can't wait...but I suspect you are
just lying again.
And, BTW, that "traitor" actually fought in that war, while
the "W" was downing six packs, and snorting coke off under
age girls belly's....
Doug Says: Kerry fought al right, he fought and attacked our
allies and innocent civilians. Kerry had to be straightjacketed
to stop him from killing innocent and unarmed civilians. Even
Kerry's own men tell stories of Kerry ordering them to fire on
unarmed civilians. Kerry did not fight, he went to Vietnam with
political support to get medals he did not deserve so he could
come back and help the communists kill Americans.
Also please post some evidence in respect to your coke lies.
In respect to Iraq, it also should be noted the Brits,
Aussies,
Italians, Americans and the rest of the military commanders
are
directly contradicting the Kerryites in every press
conference.
They say everything is going fine, on schedule, and we do not
need any more troops. I wonder, should we listen to what our
Generals and our Joint Chief's of Staff say about war, and
all of
their allied Generals, or should our military commanders do
what
anti-military, anti-defense, "New Left" communist types like
Hanoi John Kerry want our military to do?
Yeah, after all, we listened to them with respect the
"imminent WMD's deployable in 45 minutes".
Doug Says: Of course, and they were right. And they are right
now.
And what a _great_ plan they had
for Iraq after they liberated it...
Doug Says: You know of a better plan? The accomplishments in
Iraq by our military thus far will go down in history as one of
the most efficient and productive occupation plans ever devised
or executed in the history of modern warfare.
Can you imagine Hanoi John Kerry leading a rifle platoon in
Iraq?
How about "W" ?
Doug Says: At least President Bush would not turn around and
shoot his own men like Kerry did.
The man has _never_ seen action, other than under age girls
on drugs, that is....
Doug Says: Duh, President Bush has been the commander in chief
of our entire military for the past three years...and he has
never lost a major battle, and he has accomplished every
objective. Kerry managed to kill civlians and then turned on his
own men.
What was it he called his "little problem", a womb ***** ?
How could he claim medals he did not deserve and murder
innocent
people and expect to get away with it in Iraq - which are the
hallmarks of Hanoi John Kerry's entire four months of
military
service in Vietnam? (Remember what Admiral Zumwalt said about
Kerry? He said; that; "he almost had to straightjacket Kerry
because he was killing so many innocent civilians," and
General
Patton III said of Kerry's "military service" that; "Kerry
gave
aid and comfort to the enemy!" Even all of Kerry's commanders
in
Vietnam got together and said "Kerry is not fit to be a
commander
in chief of the military" and if that is not enough, 85% of
those
Vietnam vets Kerry was photographed within Vietnam (the
photograph Kerry has the audacity to use in his campaign
advertisements) say they support President Bush!
People who support Bush, are about as trustworthy as Bush.
Doug Says: Typical statement from a traitor backing moron. You
obviously do not want to be confused with facts, lies suit you
and yours well.
I think _that_ says it all.
How about Nancy Peloso leading a squad of infantry on patrol?
Snivel, whine, cry and blubber, hell the goons will hear her
squad coming for ten miles!
How about "W" ?
"Now, (hic), you guys go on up ahead, I'll hang here
in the back......"
"Hey guys, where did "W" go ?"
"I don't know Sarge, but I found his medical records...."
Doug Says: President Bush will go down in history as one of the
most effective and capable commander's in chief we have ever had.
He never loses a major battle or operation. Kerry not only
murders nothing but civilians, he helps the enemy kill his own
men!
Our Generals have degrees in military science and tactics.
Most
of them have their PhD's, and they have been involved in
Vietnam
and other wars for decades. Our Generals and Admirals study
battle tactics every day of their lives and they know in
detail
all of the tiny elements contained our massive war machine,
and
how to use all of those elements in concert.
And they _still_ screwed the pooch in Iraq, huh ?
Doug Says: Iraq is nothing but a success story moron. Perhaps
one of the best and most efficient in our history. Please
provide any past war that can even compare to the successes our
military has accomplished in Afghanistan and Iraq. Compared to
past wars, this action will go down in history as one that
accomplished the most with the least amount of casualties, both
military and civilian.
You clearly are not aware of the typical cost of war. We have
lost less causalities than we lost in a single week in Vietnam
even with Kerry working for the enemy, and we have lost less
casualties than we lost in a single week in Korea, and we have
lost less casualties than we lost in a single hour during WWII or
WWI. Yet we have deposed two totalitarian nations, and all we
are doing now is mopping up the standard guerillas that exist
after a nation is defeated. We fought guerillas after WWI,
WWII, Korea and Vietnam -for years after those nations were
liberated. So please, stop the Kerry "doom and gloom" *****.
We all know that Iraq and Afghanistan, in comparison to what
Kerry and Peloso predicted before this war, and in comparison to
all previous wars, is the greatest success story ever told in
respect to modern warfare.
In contrast, Hanoi John Kerry and Nancy Peloso are
fundamentally
communists, they know only how to lie about President Bush,
lie
about our war on terrorism, lie about economics, lie about
lost
jobs, and of course, they also know how to be obstructionists
in
respect to the interests of the American people. (They
blocked
the appointment of Judges, blocked oil drilling, blocked
energy
packages, blocked tax rebates, blocked anything that would
help
the American people that might also simultaneously make
President
Bush look good).
Sure they did... I saw them block some of the most corrupt
bills that have ever been entered into the American Congress...
Doug Says: I agree, especially Kerry who backed Banking bills
right after they contributed to his senatorial campaign.
Your Con in Chief just had his _intentional_ lies and
propaganda
declared _ILLEGAL_....
Yes, just like Hitler, "W" was creating fake news reports
that
were really propaganda, for his Medicare Con^^^Bill.
"The investigative arm of Congress has found that parts of a
Bush administration video explaining changes to Medicare
violate
the government ban on publicity and propaganda."
Bush not only lies, he uses the Government Machine to lie.
Doug Says: The Medicare perscription bill is the best thing that
ever happened to our seniors. Kerry is trying to lie about that
bill, and President Bush has the right to reveal the truth about
this bill. Nothing has been *proved* illegal moron, the higher
courts need to rule first.
Now, about that traitor word.... looking pretty much like
projection, to me.....\\
Doug Says: John Kerry is an American traitor. He tried his best
to get American soldiers killed in Vietnam, and he is trying his
best to get American soldiers killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Kerry's spots have not changed.
Most people with an IQ above 12 know that war is a fluid
undertaking. No one has a crystal ball that will tell them
every
possible contingency in respect to what our enemy may or may
not
do during war.
As an example, who knew in advance that Iran would be willing
to
spend 100 million dollars a day to send their suicide bombers
and
goons from Afghanistan and Iran into Iraq? Did Kerry or the
dems
even warn about that possibility? Naw, they did not mention
it
nor foresee it either . . . so why are they snipping at
President
Bush for not knowing what Iran would do in advance?
So, you are not claiming that Iran is the basis for the Iraqi
resistance ?
The same Iran you claimed we would be in a all out nuclear
war with, in under 10 years ?
Doug Says: You need a reading comprehension lesson. Read what I
said above again. I said Iran was behind most of the
terrorism---learn to read. Moreover, your claim that I said
anything is always a lie, and the above is no exception.
The Kerryites did say we would lose 10,000 men just to take
Baghdad and we would kill 500,000 civilians in the process .
.. .
so I wonder, has anyone mentioned their glaring and
preposterous
incorrect projections about the Iraqi war? If they are going
to
criticize President Bush should they also not mention their
incredible false military projections as well? Naw, asking
Kerry
not to be a hypocrite is akin to asking him to tell the
truth,
don't hold your breath.
Well, you are right about one thing... we didn't lose as
many as expected. On the other hand, we haven't exactly beaten
them yet.... just chased them into hiding, and into using
guerilla techniques.
Doug Says: Dummy, mopping up guerillas happens after we defeat
any nation. It is common, not unexpected and not hard to defeat.
The only unknown factor in respect to this undertaking is how
much money Iran and Syria would be furnishing the terrorists.
But even with such support the guerillas are nothing more than
guerilla goons, and they are running out of men and supplies.
They are moribund...it is just a matter of time. Further, once
President Bush is re-elected, then we will address the Iranian
problem, and when Iran is defeated, then all support for Muslim
goons will dry up.
It is clear Iran is desperate to keep our troops busy while
they
hurriedly finish their nuclear bomb programs. Iran is afraid
that
if we have it easy in Iraq, then they will not have enough
time
to build their nukes before we force the government of Iran
to
surrender . . . ergo the big money and big effort to attack
coalition forces in Iraq by Syria and Iran.
Oh, now here comes the Iran Nuke thing....
You also implicated Saudi's in your last propaganda post,
what happened, they resign or something ? Oh, that's
right, the Bush-Saudi connection is exposed, now , suddenly
they are our friends.
Doug Says: Once again, as usual, you are lying about what I
said. You fabricate nonsense, then reply to your own nonsense,
pathetic.
Moreover, people with an IQ of 12 or higher also know that we
are
not fighting Girl Scouts in the Middle East. The terrorist
goons
we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan represent the filth
of
the earth and the scourge of the human race. These goons are
interloping into Iraq from Afghanistan, Syria and Iran, and
if we
were not fighting them in Iraq we would be fighting them in
Afghanistan or somewhere else, maybes even in Ohio or Nevada.
No, these are people trying to protect their _own_ land, not
standard Al Quaida fundamental loons....
Doug Says: Duh, these goons are coming in from Iran and Syria,
and they are trying to protect the Butcher of Baghdad and radical
Muslim genocide against all that is not radical Muslim. No land
is involved.
They may be scum, but you aren't going to see them on our
soil. An Al Quaida cell, maybe, but not them.
Doug Says: Thanks to President Bush. But where does our soil
end?
Our war on terror is what the fighting in Iraq is all about.
No, that was Al Quaida, Iraq wasn't implicated in any way.
Doug Says: Wrong again. Saddam was involved with radical Islam
and he created his own terrorist organization, and our Congress
voted three times to remove Saddam, once even before President
Bush took office, and that Clinton vote was based upon Saddam (1)
proliferating WMD, and (2) supporting terrorism. Learn to read
and then read our Congressional resolutions in respect to Iraq
before you continue to make such a fool out of yourself over this
issue.
And
at least in Iraq there will be soon hundreds of thousands of
Iraqi soldiers, mercenaries and police on our side. That is
why
the goons are murdering as fast as they can. They know when
the
Iraqi and coalition forces unite, and it will start to happen
on
June 30, 2004, that event will spell a victory for Iraq, the
Middle East in general, the USA led coalition forces, and of
course will represent yet another victory for the Bush
administration.
You make it sounds sucesfull, instead of the royal fuckup
it has been... and the economy is going great too...
Suuuuuure it is Doug, Suuuuure.
Doug Says: All of the statistics agree with me, and make your
claims appear idiotic. Of course of economy is going great, and
of course Iraq is a great victory. See above for the proof.
No wonder Kerry is lying almost as fast as the goons are
murdering. They both seem to have a mutual objective to
destroy
the Bush administration. And they both seem to not care about
the
unethical means they employ to try to achieve that objective.
Speaking of Unethical, how much you getting for lying to
your own country, Doug (Tm) , Hrmmmm ?
"Tokyo" Doug ?
Doug Says: Once again, only your pea brain knows what the hell
you are taking about again.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Doug Grant (Tm)
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kel" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
30 May 2004 03:19:44 AM |
|
|
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:1AJtc.3893$_k3.85824@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Doug Says: You know of a better plan? The accomplishments in
Iraq by our military thus far will go down in history as one of
the most efficient and productive occupation plans ever devised
or executed in the history of modern warfare.
In a lifetime of insane postings, Doug will never top what he has written
above. He truly is the saddest man alive.
.
|
|
|
| User: "vonroach" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
30 May 2004 07:01:09 AM |
|
|
On Sun, 30 May 2004 09:19:44 +0100, "Kel"
<ostermanuk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:1AJtc.3893$_k3.85824@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Doug Says: You know of a better plan? The accomplishments in
Iraq by our military thus far will go down in history as one of
the most efficient and productive occupation plans ever devised
or executed in the history of modern warfare.
In a lifetime of insane postings, Doug will never top what he has written
above. He truly is the saddest man alive.
On the contrary, Kelbaby, you and your islamic extremist allies who
seek to kill or convert the rest of us to your own beliefs have earned
that title. You are an inmate of Allah's insane asylum.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kel" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
31 May 2004 01:01:09 AM |
|
|
"vonroach" <hadrainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:14jjb0lnru689q54o509d053sndakudoab@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 May 2004 09:19:44 +0100, "Kel"
<ostermanuk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:1AJtc.3893$_k3.85824@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Doug Says: You know of a better plan? The accomplishments in
Iraq by our military thus far will go down in history as one of
the most efficient and productive occupation plans ever devised
or executed in the history of modern warfare.
In a lifetime of insane postings, Doug will never top what he has written
above. He truly is the saddest man alive.
On the contrary, Kelbaby, you and your islamic extremist allies who
seek to kill or convert the rest of us to your own beliefs have earned
that title. You are an inmate of Allah's insane asylum.
Ah, we can always trust Doug's bumboy to slide out of the sewer and back his
mentor no matter how insane his mentor's posting was. If you truly believe
that Iraq is "the most efficient and productive occupation plan EVER
devised" I suggest you buy a TV and switch it on to any channel other than
Fox News. The occupation is a disaster.
.
|
|
|
| User: "In The Darkness" |
|
| Title: Re: WAR IS A WORK IN PROGRESS |
31 May 2004 10:50:00 AM |
|
|
Kel wrote:
"vonroach" <hadrainc@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:14jjb0lnru689q54o509d053sndakudoab@4ax.com...
On Sun, 30 May 2004 09:19:44 +0100, "Kel"
<ostermanuk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
"DGVREIMAN" <dggrant@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:1AJtc.3893$_k3.85824@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Doug Says: You know of a better plan? The accomplishments in
Iraq by our military thus far will go down in history as one of
the most efficient and productive occupation plans ever devised
or executed in the history of modern warfare.
In a lifetime of insane postings, Doug will never top what he has written
above. He truly is the saddest man alive.
On the contrary, Kelbaby, you and your islamic extremist allies who
seek to kill or convert the rest of us to your own beliefs have earned
that title. You are an inmate of Allah's insane asylum.
Ah, we can always trust Doug's bumboy to slide out of the sewer and back his
mentor no matter how insane his mentor's posting was. If you truly believe
that Iraq is "the most efficient and productive occupation plan EVER
devised" I suggest you buy a TV and switch it on to any channel other than
Fox News. The occupation | | | | | | |
