WHERE IS A PROSECUTOR WHEN YOU REALLY NEED ONE?

(C) Copyright 2004 by DGVReiman, all rights reserved.


The so-called American "war-protesters", although relatively few
in number, purposefully blocked the roads and strung tape across
the road to force vehicles to crash and injure the occupants and
bystanders. The "protesters" also purposefully blocked bridges by
blocking all lanes of traffic, and they did the same on busy
streets in four major U.S. cities. They publicly acknowledged
their intent was to force the Police to divert from looking for
terrorists by controlling them and arresting them.

The "war protesters" also confronted and assaulted citizens that
disagreed with them, and even removed citizens that disagreed
with them from their vehicles and collectively beat them with
clubs.

These marches have become nothing more than terrorist diversions
or sabotage. The "war protesters" are clearly working directly to
support and abet terrorists that wish to murder Americans.
Moreover, the "war protesters" are violating several key statutes
of U.S. laws. The actions of these "war protesters" represent a
violation of several legal statutes (including riot statutes) and
my constitutional rights and the constitutional rights of those
people that wish to travel without arrest or abridgement by
others. Not to mention our right to be protected and served by
our Police. The actions of these "war protesters" may also
conform to the statutes of the Federal Racketeering Statutes.

I believe the U.S. Federal Government must start to become
involved in prosecuting these "war protesters" for their obvious
and flagrant violations of our laws, not to mention aiding and
abetting terrorists.

How many ambulances were blocked during these protests? How many
Fire Engines? How many Police were taken away from protecting
citizens from terrorists to deal with these "war protesters?" How
many businesses lost their livelihood during the period of "war
protest?" How many City dollars that normally would go to help
the citizenry went to control, arrest or jail these "war
protesters?" How many people missed their flights or other key
appointments because their rights to free access to public
streets were denied by these so-called "war protesters?"

Whatever amount this purposeful and wanton disruption cost the
American taxpayers, the cities involved, and those in which their
lives and businesses were disrupted should represent the amount
of damages demanded in a Federal Lawsuit directed against all
participants, organizers and associations that enacted or
sponsored these "war protests. Since many were arrested, the
names and addresses of the "war protesters" are public knowledge.

Are there any lawyers out there that would like to take this case
Pro Bono? I know a group of people that will do all of the
administrative work for cost. Please email me if you are
interested. Openly supporting the enemies of the USA with the use
of riots and personal attacks on citizens, and the purposeful
disruption of Government services, is analogous to Nazism, and I
do not agree such attacks represent acts that are protected under
the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Doug Grant (Tm)