| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Sam Sloan" |
| Date: |
27 Apr 2006 07:22:49 PM |
| Object: |
Was this a gaffe by Wolf Blitzer, or was it deliberate? |
Was this a gaffe by Wolf Blitzer, or was it deliberate?
On CNN News just now, Newscaster Paula Zahn said:
"This woman gets calls all night long because pornographic pictures of
her were posted on the Internet. It could happen to anybody. It could
happen to you."
To this, Wolf Blitzer replied." Right Paula. We will be looking for
you there."
Did Wolfe Blitzer really mean that? Did he realize what he said?
I think he really did mean that.
Sam Sloan
.
|
|
| User: "Phil Innes" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this a gaffe by Wolf Blitzer, or was it deliberate? |
27 Apr 2006 08:00:49 PM |
|
|
Sam, you're a very sick man.
Phil
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Historian" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this a gaffe by Wolf Blitzer, or was it deliberate? |
27 Apr 2006 08:11:58 PM |
|
|
Phil Innes wrote:
Sam, you're a very sick man.
Phil
For once Phil and I agree. Now if we can only get him to stop
pretending to be a moron and a dung-beetle.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this a gaffe by Wolf Blitzer, or was it deliberate? |
27 Apr 2006 09:31:01 PM |
|
|
HISTORIAN RESPONDS TO FAKE INNES
Check the header, Neil!
<Phil Innes wrote: Sam, you're a very sick man.
For once Phil and I agree. Now if we can only get him to stop
pretending to be a moron and a dung-beetle.> Neil Brennen
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chess One" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this a gaffe by Wolf Blitzer, or was it deliberate? |
28 Apr 2006 07:15:47 AM |
|
|
<parrthenon@cs.com> wrote in message
news:1146191461.813229.295650@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
HISTORIAN RESPONDS TO FAKE INNES
Check the header, Neil!
<Phil Innes wrote: Sam, you're a very sick man.
For once Phil and I agree. Now if we can only get him to stop
pretending to be a moron and a dung-beetle.> Neil Brennen
Five years ago I thought some of the abuse coincidences innocent.
More recently we have seen revolving anon addresses, proxy political agents,
a vampirarchy of 'representatives', with supplied material to excite the
baser tastes among us; for those in desperate need to belong to absolutely
anything at all, except to themselves, and who don't care the cost paid by
other people for their blind grasping ambition.
It is hard to tell where their talents begin. Its not hard to feel a
compassion for these lost souls and their devil's-deal, since what they want
will not deliver them what they think it will.
Incidis in Scyllam cupiens vitare Charybdim.
The insufferable [without whiskey] Scottish poet said, "A man's a man for a'
that." Which means that there is a level of reduction of human beings which
is not possible. He also meant that no one should be excused the
responsibilities of existence as a human being, in an expression which
claims the democracy of the spirit.
Phil Innes
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
