| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
28 Dec 2003 01:25:55 PM |
| Object: |
Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ? |
Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ?
____________________________________________________________________
Some say the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq was to give the oppressed
Iraqi people democracy.
When did the Bush Administration on the job of Amnesty International ?
Does the Bush Administration intend to apply these noble humanitarian
principles to a wide variety of countries ?
And in all those liberated countries, will the Bush Administration establish
the right to vote and freedom from crooked elections ?
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ? |
28 Dec 2003 03:09:30 PM |
|
|
And here's yet ANOTHER ignorant leftist with yet another silly conspiracy
theory.
How stupid do you people think we are? As dum as you?
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ihbuuvcjbo7lngsiibln27dienn6fl8drc@4ax.com...
Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ?
____________________________________________________________________
Some say the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq was to give the oppressed
Iraqi people democracy.
When did the Bush Administration on the job of Amnesty International ?
Does the Bush Administration intend to apply these noble humanitarian
principles to a wide variety of countries ?
And in all those liberated countries, will the Bush Administration
establish
the right to vote and freedom from crooked elections ?
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tempest" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ? |
29 Dec 2003 11:50:00 AM |
|
|
<nshinede@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message news:<eEHHb.36674$ms2.34655@fe2.columbus.rr.com>...
And here's yet ANOTHER ignorant leftist with yet another silly conspiracy
theory.
How stupid do you people think we are? As dum as you?
Obviously no one is as "dum" as you.
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ihbuuvcjbo7lngsiibln27dienn6fl8drc@4ax.com...
Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ?
____________________________________________________________________
Some say the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq was to give the oppressed
Iraqi people democracy.
When did the Bush Administration on the job of Amnesty International ?
Does the Bush Administration intend to apply these noble humanitarian
principles to a wide variety of countries ?
And in all those liberated countries, will the Bush Administration
establish
the right to vote and freedom from crooked elections ?
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eltanin" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ? |
30 Dec 2003 11:53:58 PM |
|
|
Keeping those big cars running off the assembly line with cheap fuel.
Yeah we've heard that over and over but it's just so blatently
true.....
In article <2df29c5c.0312290950.4cef99c0@posting.google.com>, Tempest
<mordacpreventor@hotmail.com> wrote:
<nshinede@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:<eEHHb.36674$ms2.34655@fe2.columbus.rr.com>...
And here's yet ANOTHER ignorant leftist with yet another silly conspiracy
theory.
How stupid do you people think we are? As dum as you?
Obviously no one is as "dum" as you.
<grub@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:ihbuuvcjbo7lngsiibln27dienn6fl8drc@4ax.com...
Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ?
____________________________________________________________________
Some say the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq was to give the oppressed
Iraqi people democracy.
When did the Bush Administration on the job of Amnesty International ?
Does the Bush Administration intend to apply these noble humanitarian
principles to a wide variety of countries ?
And in all those liberated countries, will the Bush Administration
establish
the right to vote and freedom from crooked elections ?
____________________________________________________________________
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "InsuranceBroker" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ? |
28 Dec 2003 08:38:51 PM |
|
|
Subject: Re: Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ?
From:
Date: 12/28/2003 4:09 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <eEHHb.36674$ms2.34655@fe2.columbus.rr.com>
And here's yet ANOTHER ignorant leftist with yet another silly conspiracy
theory.
I know. It is getting difficult to figure out who is the rabid right and who
is the conspiracy with all the different new reasons for starting the war.
How stupid do you people think we are? As dum as you?
It is pretty clear that a lot of republicans think the public is pretty dumb.
I guess you rabid right will buy all the air time so no one can hear what you
actually stated prior to the start of the war.
Doing Insurance business in the Garden State
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Roedy Green" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ? |
28 Dec 2003 06:02:26 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:09:30 GMT, <nshinede@columbus.rr.com> wrote or
quoted :
And here's yet ANOTHER ignorant leftist with yet another silly conspiracy
theory.
How stupid do you people think we are? As dum as you?
You would have better luck accusing others of stupidity if you ran
your posts through a spell checker first.
You have said absolutely nothing to counter the information in the
post. That makes YOU look very "dum".
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
.
|
|
|
| User: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Karl_Sigerist_Sr=A9?=" |
|
| Title: Re: Was this really the #1 reason for the invasion of Iraq ? |
29 Dec 2003 03:15:02 PM |
|
|
"Roedy Green" <look-at-the-website-for-actual-Roedy@mindprod.com> wrote in
message news:qlruuvgd8tq3civoh5i209fa333ulke36h@4ax.com...
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:09:30 GMT, <nshinede@columbus.rr.com> wrote or
quoted :
And here's yet ANOTHER ignorant leftist with yet another silly conspiracy
theory.
How stupid do you people think we are? As dum as you?
You would have better luck accusing others of stupidity if you ran
your posts through a spell checker first.
You have said absolutely nothing to counter the information in the
post. That makes YOU look very "dum".
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
Coaching, problem solving, economical contract programming.
See http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jgloss.html for The Java Glossary.
_________________________________________________________
This post is only only for people who can read and understand what they
read.
Just a reminder, WMD was the main reason to invade Iraq,
the "Liberation Iraq" BS came later after they could not back up
the claim of the many thousands of tons of WMD.
Neither could they prove any significant Al Qaeda - Iraq.connection
The war was and is based on lies.
It's amazing the last straw the Neo-cons desperately hang on to
is the "Bush Hating" or "America Hating" mantra, this is a very lousy
and hollow defence.
Well, sorry folks, some people and Nations take lies not lightly,
especially not from the President of the USA, the greatest nation on earth.
The President with the "God called me" excuse,
KarlSr©
________________________________________________________
Source of the Radio Address
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/print/20030208.html
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
February 8, 2003
President's Radio Address
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. On Wednesday, Secretary of State Powell briefed
the United Nations Security Council on Iraq's illegal weapons program, its
attempts to hide those weapons, and its links to terrorist groups.
The Iraqi regime's violations of Security Council Resolutions are evident,
they are dangerous to America and the world, and they continue to this hour.
The regime has never accounted for a vast arsenal of deadly, biological and
chemical weapons. To the contrary, the regime is pursuing an elaborate
campaign to conceal its weapons materials and to hide or intimidate key
experts and scientists. This effort of deception is directed from the
highest levels of the Iraqi regime, including Saddam Hussein, his son,
Iraq's vice president and the very official responsible for cooperating with
inspectors.
The Iraqi regime has actively and secretly attempted to obtain equipment
needed to produce chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Firsthand
witnesses have informed us that Iraq has at least seven mobile factories for
the production of biological agents -- equipment mounted on trucks and rails
to evade discovery.
The Iraqi regime has acquired and tested the means to deliver weapons of
mass destruction. It has never accounted for thousands of bombs and shells
capable of delivering chemical weapons. It is actively pursuing components
for prohibited ballistic missiles. And we have sources that tell us that
Saddam Hussein recently authorized Iraqi field commanders to use chemical
weapons -- the very weapons the dictator tells us he does not have.
One of the greatest dangers we face is that weapons of mass destruction
might be passed to terrorists who would not hesitate to use those weapons.
Saddam Hussein has longstanding, direct and continuing ties to terrorist
networks. Senior members of Iraqi intelligence and al Qaeda have met at
least eight times since the early 1990s. Iraq has sent bomb-making and
document forgery experts to work with al Qaeda. Iraq has also provided al
Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons training. And an al Qaeda
operative was sent to Iraq several times in the late 1990s for help in
acquiring poisons and gases.
We also know that Iraq is harbouring a terrorist network headed by a senior
al Qaeda terrorist planner. This network runs a poison and explosive
training camp in northeast Iraq, and many of its leaders are known to be in
Baghdad.
This is the situation as we find it -- 12 years after Saddam Hussein agreed
to disarm and more than 90 days after the Security Council passed Resolution
1441 by a unanimous vote. Saddam Hussein was required to make a full
declaration of his weapons programs. He has not done so. Saddam Hussein was
required to fully cooperate in the disarmament of his regime. He has not
done so. Saddam Hussein was given a final chance. He is throwing away that
chance.
Having made its demands, the Security Council must not back down when those
demands are defied and mocked by a dictator. The United States would welcome
and support a new resolution making clear that the Security Council stands
behinds its previous demands. Yet, resolutions mean little without resolve.
And the United States, along with a growing coalition of nations, will take
whatever action is necessary to defend ourselves and disarm the Iraqi
regime.
Thank you for listening.
END
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/02/20030208.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
