| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Harry Hope" |
| Date: |
22 Dec 2004 09:20:55 PM |
| Object: |
Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-governor-recount-summary-box,0,1845869.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
Summary Box: Wash. Governor's Race Turns
By The Associated Press
DEMOCRATS CELEBRATE: Democratic gubernatorial candidate Christine
Gregoire won two victories in her fight to emerge victorious after an
extraordinarily close election.
COURT RULES: The state's Supreme Court ruled that more than 700
belatedly discovered ballots from Democratic-leaning King County
should be counted.
COUNTY RECOUNT: A hand recount of King County ballots made Gregoire
the apparent but unofficial statewide winner, even without counting
the overlooked King County ballots. Supporters of Republican Dino
Rossi say the race isn't over.
_____________________________________________________
Harry
.
|
|
| User: "George Johnson" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
23 Dec 2004 11:13:31 AM |
|
|
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
|
| From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
|
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-governor-recount-summary
-box,0,1845869.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
|
| Summary Box: Wash. Governor's Race Turns
|
| By The Associated Press
|
| DEMOCRATS CELEBRATE: Democratic gubernatorial candidate Christine
| Gregoire won two victories in her fight to emerge victorious after an
| extraordinarily close election.
|
| COURT RULES: The state's Supreme Court ruled that more than 700
| belatedly discovered ballots from Democratic-leaning King County
| should be counted.
|
| COUNTY RECOUNT: A hand recount of King County ballots made Gregoire
| the apparent but unofficial statewide winner, even without counting
| the overlooked King County ballots. Supporters of Republican Dino
| Rossi say the race isn't over.
|
| _____________________________________________________
|
| Harry
And the anti-American Satanist Republican DEATHCULT has enacted several
FEDERAL CRIMES in denying Americans their Constitutionally protected right
to vote.
Here is another listed example about the criminal activities of the
Republican DEATHCULT in their continual "War Against America".
http://marcrios.typepad.com/distraction/2004/week32/
August 06, 2004
Banana Republic
The author of the following quote stumbled onto a disturbing method to
disenfranchise people (or at least many of them): send change of address
cards in their names.
Apparently there are groups out there who buy copies of the voter
registration rolls, then send in new registrations for registered voters
giving them a new address. It's really a more sophisticated version of the
whole thing with the felony lists in Florida in the last election - however,
people aren't being REMOVED from the voting rolls, and hence there's no red
flag being raised. After all, people DO move and send in change of address,
so there's no reason for them to suspect voter fraud. And there's really no
way to trace this, so there's really no way to detect this. But in effect
what it means is voters are removed from the rolls - after all, if you're
unknowingly registered in another precinct, how can you vote at yours? I was
lucky...I have the job flexibility and transportation to go down to the
election board and find out the problems, but I'm betting a lot of the other
people with the same problems don't. And there are a lot - at my precinct,
during the period we were at the polls, which was pretty slow, there were
only about five or six people in and out, including us. And of those, me and
one other guy found ourselves off the rolls, and one woman said she'd had
the same thing happen to her during the 2000 presidential election and had
to spend the entire day down at the election board.
By the way, I'll just say that I think it's significant that I happen to
live in a largely minority, heavily Democratic district in a swing state.
You can draw your own conclusions from that. But I'll add that I've recently
been reading Bush's Brain, a book about the INCREDIBLY FUCKING SCARY Karl
Rove, and this scheme has a distinct Rovian stench to it. (Three guesses who
masterminded the similar scheme in Florida for Bush? And the first two don't
count.)
Epilogue: the author had his precinct changed by mistake. Although this
means no one attempted to disenfranchise him specifically, this story is
noteworthy because he learned about a devious scheme to impede voters
without actually removing them from the rolls.
Posted by Marc Rios on August 06, 2004 at 12:25 AM in Bush | Permalink |
Comments (0) | TrackBack
********************
The Republican Anti-American DEATHCULT has filed FRAUDULENT "Change of
Address" forms to the Voter Registration List to again remove Americans from
their God-given right to vote.
The Republican Satanic DEATHCULT Party should be arrested and executed
for their relentless sinister "War Against America". They are Godless
wretched sick imitations of human beings skulking around in darkness to
unleash their Satan-born urges.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
23 Dec 2004 11:20:33 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to be found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat _before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
23 Dec 2004 04:19:18 PM |
|
|
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to be found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat _before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Jim E
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now the entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
This scam could go on for months
Welcome to Cook county.
There are NO blue states, just blue counties in Red States.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Larry Hewitt" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
23 Dec 2004 08:15:15 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:330uj3F3reqalU1@individual.net...
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the
election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to be
found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat _before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Jim E
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now the
entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
This scam could go on for months
Not keeping up, are you. The entire state has already been hand recounted.
Larry
Welcome to Cook county.
There are NO blue states, just blue counties in Red States.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
23 Dec 2004 05:42:56 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to be found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat _before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now the entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
That is not in the court's decision:
http://www.king5.com/sharedcontent/northwest/specialreport/stories/NW_122204WABsupcourtruling.35e95cee.html
This scam could go on for months
Welcome to Cook county.
There are NO blue states, just blue counties in Red States.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
23 Dec 2004 05:56:43 PM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41CB5800.98A0492D@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the
election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to be
found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat
_before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now the
entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
That is not in the court's decision:
That's how it will all shake out in the end.
The lawyers aren't done yet.
All the courts in the state, however, can't defeat the ingrained dem bias in
King county.
The fix is in.
The blue county in the RED state.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puddy" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
23 Dec 2004 08:36:11 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33149pF3qt50pU1@individual.net...
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41CB5800.98A0492D@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the
election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to be
found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat
_before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now the
entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
That is not in the court's decision:
That's how it will all shake out in the end.
The lawyers aren't done yet.
The Lawyers have virtually no case to do anything. It's up to the
county's discression whether to recanvas or not. Most county auditors
have made clear they will not reconsider any rejected votes, as the votes
that Rossi wants reconsidered went through the whole process, were properly
considered and rejected. Plus state law does not allow recanvassing of
votes in counties which have already certified their results.
All the courts in the state, however, can't defeat the ingrained dem bias
in
King county.
The fix is in.
The blue county in the RED state.
You can't call a state in which democrats outnumber republicans by quite
a large number a red state.
Jeremy Olson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
24 Dec 2004 09:40:01 AM |
|
|
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqfvar$4oa$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33149pF3qt50pU1@individual.net...
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41CB5800.98A0492D@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the
election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to be
found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat
_before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now the
entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
That is not in the court's decision:
That's how it will all shake out in the end.
The lawyers aren't done yet.
The Lawyers have virtually no case to do anything. It's up to the
county's discression whether to recanvas or not. Most county auditors
have made clear they will not reconsider any rejected votes, as the votes
that Rossi wants reconsidered went through the whole process, were
properly
considered and rejected. Plus state law does not allow recanvassing of
votes in counties which have already certified their results.
All the courts in the state, however, can't defeat the ingrained dem bias
in
King county.
The fix is in.
The blue county in the RED state.
You can't call a state in which democrats outnumber republicans by
quite
a large number a red state.
Jeremy Olson
You can if the vast majority of them live in only one county of the state.
That county , coincidentally, being the only major urban county, and the
most dependant on entitlement programs.
It seems to be this way in all states.
Duh.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puddy" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
24 Dec 2004 07:29:49 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332rikF3tdla2U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqfvar$4oa$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33149pF3qt50pU1@individual.net...
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41CB5800.98A0492D@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the
election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to
be
found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat
_before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now the
entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
That is not in the court's decision:
That's how it will all shake out in the end.
The lawyers aren't done yet.
The Lawyers have virtually no case to do anything. It's up to the
county's discression whether to recanvas or not. Most county auditors
have made clear they will not reconsider any rejected votes, as the
votes
that Rossi wants reconsidered went through the whole process, were
properly
considered and rejected. Plus state law does not allow recanvassing
of
votes in counties which have already certified their results.
All the courts in the state, however, can't defeat the ingrained dem
bias
in
King county.
The fix is in.
The blue county in the RED state.
You can't call a state in which democrats outnumber republicans by
quite
a large number a red state.
Jeremy Olson
You can if the vast majority of them live in only one >county of the
state.
And that vast majority is made up of mostly democrats, making it a blue
state. The winner gets more votes, not more land mass.
Jeremy Olson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
25 Dec 2004 08:35:23 AM |
|
|
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqifqe$p80$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332rikF3tdla2U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqfvar$4oa$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33149pF3qt50pU1@individual.net...
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41CB5800.98A0492D@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the
election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to
be
found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat
_before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now
the
entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
That is not in the court's decision:
That's how it will all shake out in the end.
The lawyers aren't done yet.
The Lawyers have virtually no case to do anything. It's up to
the
county's discression whether to recanvas or not. Most county
auditors
have made clear they will not reconsider any rejected votes, as the
votes
that Rossi wants reconsidered went through the whole process, were
properly
considered and rejected. Plus state law does not allow recanvassing
of
votes in counties which have already certified their results.
All the courts in the state, however, can't defeat the ingrained dem
bias
in
King county.
The fix is in.
The blue county in the RED state.
You can't call a state in which democrats outnumber republicans by
quite
a large number a red state.
Jeremy Olson
You can if the vast majority of them live in only one >county of the
state.
And that vast majority is made up of mostly democrats, making it a blue
state. The winner gets more votes, not more land mass.
Jeremy Olson
You will have to note that Those areas of states that make them blew, are
always congested,
urban enclaves dependant on entitlement programs to keep the lid on.
Gee wonder why that is???
Bailing out NY was one of the worst mistakes of the century.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puddy" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
25 Dec 2004 11:20:34 AM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:335c5dF3turi4U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqifqe$p80$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332rikF3tdla2U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqfvar$4oa$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33149pF3qt50pU1@individual.net...
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41CB5800.98A0492D@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the
election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting
to
be
found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat
_before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now
the
entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
That is not in the court's decision:
That's how it will all shake out in the end.
The lawyers aren't done yet.
The Lawyers have virtually no case to do anything. It's up to
the
county's discression whether to recanvas or not. Most county
auditors
have made clear they will not reconsider any rejected votes, as the
votes
that Rossi wants reconsidered went through the whole process, were
properly
considered and rejected. Plus state law does not allow
recanvassing
of
votes in counties which have already certified their results.
All the courts in the state, however, can't defeat the ingrained dem
bias
in
King county.
The fix is in.
The blue county in the RED state.
You can't call a state in which democrats outnumber republicans by
quite
a large number a red state.
Jeremy Olson
You can if the vast majority of them live in only one >county of the
state.
And that vast majority is made up of mostly democrats, making it a
blue
state. The winner gets more votes, not more land mass.
Jeremy Olson
You will have to note that Those areas of states that make them blew, are
always congested,
urban enclaves dependant on entitlement programs to >keep the lid on.
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
26 Dec 2004 12:58:16 AM |
|
|
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the panhandlers, and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puddy" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
26 Dec 2004 08:12:36 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Of course at 8.4% King county has one of the lower poverty rates in the
state. Much, much lower than just about any eastern Washington county
which vote Republican every year.
Of course don't let facts get in the way of your preconceived notions.
Jeremy Olson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
26 Dec 2004 10:28:36 PM |
|
|
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqnr2k$igs$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Of course at 8.4% King county has one of the lower poverty rates in
the
state. Much, much lower than just about any eastern Washington county
which vote Republican every year.
Of course don't let facts get in the way of your preconceived notions.
Reading comprehension problems ??
SEATTLE you libloon, I said that Seattle was a welfare hovel, and you start
talking about the hundreds of square miles AROUND Seattle.
Typical libloon lying stunt.
Why is it that the dems only win in urban areas?
Why do they always lose in non urban areas.
The only part of Wash that Chrissy the Pretender won was the urban slums.
No connection with welfare I suppose. <snicker>
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puddy" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 07:42:57 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:339hbkF3svh3lU1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqnr2k$igs$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the
panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Of course at 8.4% King county has one of the lower poverty rates in
the
state. Much, much lower than just about any eastern Washington
county
which vote Republican every year.
Of course don't let facts get in the way of your preconceived notions.
Reading comprehension problems ??
SEATTLE you libloon, I said that Seattle was a welfare hovel, and you
start
talking about the hundreds of square miles AROUND Seattle.
Typical libloon lying stunt.
Jim E:
"You can if the vast majority of them live in only one county of the state.
That county , coincidentally, being the only major urban county, and the
most dependant on entitlement programs."
Don't try and spin you're way out of it. It won't work. Typical
republican. Lie in order to accuse your opponent of lying.
Why is it that the dems only win in urban areas?
Why do Republicans only win in uneducated rural towns? We can ask
these questions until the end of the world.
Why do they always lose in non urban areas.
Why do they always win educated voters? Any more questions you want
to ask?
The only part of Wash that Chrissy the Pretender won was the urban slums.
No connection with welfare I suppose. <snicker>
You can suppose all you want, but it doesn't make it true.
Jeremy Olson
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 08:19:33 PM |
|
|
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Why is it that the dems only win in urban areas?
Why do Republicans only win in uneducated rural towns?
So all those who live outside the urban blight area are uneducated.
Prove it
You are sounding like an elitist snob (liberal)
We can ask
these questions until the end of the world.
Why do they always lose in non urban areas.
Why do they always win educated voters?
All those people who live in the central district, they are the well
educated hope of the future ??
Those winos in pioneer square?
Perhaps that eclectic crowd on first ave?
Trying to promote a big city living on entitlements as the enclave of the
higher educated part of society is just rediculous.
What you actually have is a match between maps of high crime urban areas,
and blue areas.
Imagine that.
Jim E
Jim E
Any more questions you want
to ask?
The only part of Wash that Chrissy the Pretender won was the urban slums.
No connection with welfare I suppose. <snicker>
You can suppose all you want, but it doesn't make it true.
Jeremy Olson
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 10:46:15 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqnr2k$igs$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Of course at 8.4% King county has one of the lower poverty rates in
the
state. Much, much lower than just about any eastern Washington county
which vote Republican every year.
Of course don't let facts get in the way of your preconceived notions.
Reading comprehension problems ??
SEATTLE you libloon, I said that Seattle was a welfare hovel, and you start
talking about the hundreds of square miles AROUND Seattle.
Welfare hovel? Cite?
Typical libloon lying stunt.
Why is it that the dems only win in urban areas?
Why do they always lose in non urban areas.
Why can't the cons win where the people are?
The only part of Wash that Chrissy the Pretender won was the urban slums.
No connection with welfare I suppose. <snicker>
Nope. Unless you can back up your mouth that it was...
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 11:07:27 PM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0E517.8673AC6C@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqnr2k$igs$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the
panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Of course at 8.4% King county has one of the lower poverty rates in
the
state. Much, much lower than just about any eastern Washington
county
which vote Republican every year.
Of course don't let facts get in the way of your preconceived notions.
Reading comprehension problems ??
SEATTLE you libloon, I said that Seattle was a welfare hovel, and you
start
talking about the hundreds of square miles AROUND Seattle.
Welfare hovel? Cite?
Typical libloon lying stunt.
Why is it that the dems only win in urban areas?
Why do they always lose in non urban areas.
Why can't the cons win where the people are?
The only part of Wash that Chrissy the Pretender won was the urban slums.
No connection with welfare I suppose. <snicker>
Nope. Unless you can back up your mouth that it was...
Not necessary, Big City = welfare , axiomatic.
If you overlay a map of blue voters with a map of high crime areas, guess
what you find??
They match pretty darn well.
Wonder why that is? The civilizing effect of the big city?
LOL
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 11:15:13 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0E517.8673AC6C@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqnr2k$igs$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the
panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Of course at 8.4% King county has one of the lower poverty rates in
the
state. Much, much lower than just about any eastern Washington
county
which vote Republican every year.
Of course don't let facts get in the way of your preconceived notions.
Reading comprehension problems ??
SEATTLE you libloon, I said that Seattle was a welfare hovel, and you
start
talking about the hundreds of square miles AROUND Seattle.
Welfare hovel? Cite?
Typical libloon lying stunt.
Why is it that the dems only win in urban areas?
Why do they always lose in non urban areas.
Why can't the cons win where the people are?
The only part of Wash that Chrissy the Pretender won was the urban slums.
No connection with welfare I suppose. <snicker>
Nope. Unless you can back up your mouth that it was...
Not necessary, Big City = welfare , axiomatic.
Yes, necessary. Cite required.
If you overlay a map of blue voters with a map of high crime areas, guess
what you find??
They match pretty darn well.
Wonder why that is? The civilizing effect of the big city?
Cite required. Prove it.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 11:40:04 PM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0EBE1.1AA85060@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0E517.8673AC6C@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqnr2k$igs$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do.
Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the
panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Of course at 8.4% King county has one of the lower poverty rates
in
the
state. Much, much lower than just about any eastern Washington
county
which vote Republican every year.
Of course don't let facts get in the way of your preconceived
notions.
Reading comprehension problems ??
SEATTLE you libloon, I said that Seattle was a welfare hovel, and you
start
talking about the hundreds of square miles AROUND Seattle.
Welfare hovel? Cite?
Typical libloon lying stunt.
Why is it that the dems only win in urban areas?
Why do they always lose in non urban areas.
Why can't the cons win where the people are?
The only part of Wash that Chrissy the Pretender won was the urban
slums.
No connection with welfare I suppose. <snicker>
Nope. Unless you can back up your mouth that it was...
Not necessary, Big City = welfare , axiomatic.
Yes, necessary. Cite required.
If you overlay a map of blue voters with a map of high crime areas, guess
what you find??
They match pretty darn well.
Wonder why that is? The civilizing effect of the big city?
Cite required. Prove it.
NO I don't play that game.
Even if I provided you would ignore.
Anybody who would deny that big cities are the highest concentration of
welfare dependency and crime, is self deluded, or a liberal idiot.
Oh, I repeat myself.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
29 Dec 2004 10:18:23 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0EBE1.1AA85060@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0E517.8673AC6C@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqnr2k$igs$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do.
Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the
panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
Of course at 8.4% King county has one of the lower poverty rates
in
the
state. Much, much lower than just about any eastern Washington
county
which vote Republican every year.
Of course don't let facts get in the way of your preconceived
notions.
Reading comprehension problems ??
SEATTLE you libloon, I said that Seattle was a welfare hovel, and you
start
talking about the hundreds of square miles AROUND Seattle.
Welfare hovel? Cite?
Typical libloon lying stunt.
Why is it that the dems only win in urban areas?
Why do they always lose in non urban areas.
Why can't the cons win where the people are?
The only part of Wash that Chrissy the Pretender won was the urban
slums.
No connection with welfare I suppose. <snicker>
Nope. Unless you can back up your mouth that it was...
Not necessary, Big City = welfare , axiomatic.
Yes, necessary. Cite required.
If you overlay a map of blue voters with a map of high crime areas, guess
what you find??
They match pretty darn well.
Wonder why that is? The civilizing effect of the big city?
Cite required. Prove it.
NO I don't play that game.
Even if I provided you would ignore.
Anybody who would deny that big cities are the highest concentration of
welfare dependency and crime, is self deluded, or a liberal idiot.
Oh, I repeat myself.
Noted: You can't back up your mouth.
You've made it up again.
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 02:29:09 AM |
|
|
Since the recount is reported by county rather than by city
I don't see your point. Most of the population of King county
falls outside of Seattle. Some of the most expensive housing
in the county fall inside Seattle. Gentrification has change
the landscape. One has to look hard to find cheap housing
inside the city. I live in Federal Way and communte to north
Seattle to work. Do you think I would do this if housing was
cheaper inside the city than down south?
Here's an interesting map:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/homes/income/income_king.html
Look at Seattle and the rest of the county. I used to live in area 38.
I like living below my means. Now I live in area 78.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Puddy" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
26 Dec 2004 07:45:34 PM |
|
|
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3375o9F3semc1U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.........
Jeremy Olson
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 10:45:11 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the panhandlers, and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
If only we had a reputable source to check that, besides you just
claiming it...
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 11:15:58 PM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0E4D7.BD8AE371@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
If only we had a reputable source to check that, besides you just
claiming it...
Who but a local would know.
Eastmont is also known as the Boeing interchange.
See if you can figure out why.
Guess what big gray boat is home ported here.
We also have that ugly moron in tennis shoes
We have Baghdad Jim McStupid from Seattle.
Isn't that enough influential stupid for one state.
Oh ya, I live here all right.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 11:20:40 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0E4D7.BD8AE371@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
If only we had a reputable source to check that, besides you just
claiming it...
Who but a local would know.
Eastmont is also known as the Boeing interchange.
See if you can figure out why.
Guess what big gray boat is home ported here.
We also have that ugly moron in tennis shoes
We have Baghdad Jim McStupid from Seattle.
Isn't that enough influential stupid for one state.
Oh ya, I live here all right.
Reputable source required. Your saying so doesn't cut it.
RT
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim E" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 11:40:50 PM |
|
|
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0ED28.8AA6D19B@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0E4D7.BD8AE371@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the
panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
If only we had a reputable source to check that, besides you just
claiming it...
Who but a local would know.
Eastmont is also known as the Boeing interchange.
See if you can figure out why.
Guess what big gray boat is home ported here.
We also have that ugly moron in tennis shoes
We have Baghdad Jim McStupid from Seattle.
Isn't that enough influential stupid for one state.
Oh ya, I live here all right.
Reputable source required. Your saying so doesn't cut it.
Then FOAD, trust me nobody cares.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
29 Dec 2004 10:18:37 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0ED28.8AA6D19B@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41D0E4D7.BD8AE371@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:
LOL! You obviously dont' live in Washington. I do. Nice
try
though. Wait, no it wasn't.
Jeremy Olson
You are as usual , wrong.
South of Everett here, a little place called Silver lk. I
i 5 @ Evt mall exit.
Seattle is as I described, except I left out the winos, the
panhandlers,
and
all the other local color.
Place is a welfare hovel.
If only we had a reputable source to check that, besides you just
claiming it...
Who but a local would know.
Eastmont is also known as the Boeing interchange.
See if you can figure out why.
Guess what big gray boat is home ported here.
We also have that ugly moron in tennis shoes
We have Baghdad Jim McStupid from Seattle.
Isn't that enough influential stupid for one state.
Oh ya, I live here all right.
Reputable source required. Your saying so doesn't cut it.
Then FOAD, trust me nobody cares.
Noted: You can't back up your mouth.
You've made it up again.
RT
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
26 Dec 2004 09:08:17 AM |
|
|
You are sadly mistaken.
You must get your view of Seattle from
the waterfront and Denny Regrade areas.
Gentrification has been going on for years.
I doubt you could afford to live in Seattle.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Rich Travsky" |
|
| Title: Re: Wash. state supreme court rules found ballots should be counted |
27 Dec 2004 10:44:24 PM |
|
|
Jim E wrote:
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqifqe$p80$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:332rikF3tdla2U1@individual.net...
"Puddy" <Faceplant_04@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cqfvar$4oa$1@nwnexus-news.nwnexus.com...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33149pF3qt50pU1@individual.net...
"Rich Travsky" <traRvEsky@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:41CB5800.98A0492D@hotmMOVEail.com...
Jim E wrote:
"Larry Hewitt" <larryhewi@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:cqeu8k$dibu$1@news3.infoave.net...
"Jim E" <fatboy-plonker-@aol.com> wrote in message
news:32v97pF3qrh57U1@individual.net...
"Harry Hope" <rivrvu@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:7ceks0prpni1bsookofq0o0cpteng94rbh@4ax.com...
From The Associated Press, 12/22/04:
Let us know when they have *found* enough ballots to swing the
election.
Funny how the only county with ballots lying all over waiting to
be
found
is
the states demoshit bastion.
Not keeping up, are we??
The hand recount has already given the election to the democrat
_before_
these 700 ballots were counted.
Larry
Daily would be proud !
Not keeping up are you.
The court just said that the found votes must be counted, so now
the
entire
state must be re canvassed for uniformity.
That is not in the court's decision:
That's how it will all shake out in the end.
The lawyers aren't done yet.
The Lawyers have virtually no case to do anything. It's up to
the
county's discression whether to recanvas or not. Most county
auditors
have made clear they will not reconsider any rejected votes, as the
votes
that Rossi wants reconsidered went through the whole process, were
properly
considered and rejected. Plus state law does not allow recanvassing
of
votes in counties which have already certified their results.
All the courts in the state, however, can't defeat the ingrained dem
bias
in
King county.
The fix is in.
The blue county in the RED state.
You can't call a state in which democrats outnumber republicans by
quite
a large number a red state.
Jeremy Olson
You can if the vast majority of them live in only one >county of the
state.
And that vast majority is made up of mostly democrats, making it a blue
state. The winner gets more votes, not more land mass.
Jeremy Olson
You will have to note that Those areas of states that make them blew, are
always congested,
urban enclaves dependant on entitlement programs to keep the lid on.
Cite?
Gee wonder why that is???
Bailing out NY was one of the worst mistakes of the century.
Jim E
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
