| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"LaffsAtTheLaffer" |
| Date: |
17 Aug 2004 09:05:41 PM |
| Object: |
Washington Post can't handle the truth |
The Washington Post is AWOL:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4933509.html
.
|
|
| User: "ZenIsWhen" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
17 Aug 2004 10:34:21 PM |
|
|
--
-
"LaffsAtTheLaffer" <LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs@rightwingers.com> wrote in message
news:LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs-DB0255.22054117082004@v1gc.ha-net.ptd.net...
The Washington Post is AWOL:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4933509.html
"John H. Hinderaker and Scott W. Johnson are Minneapolis attorneys and
proprietors of the Web log "Power Line" (www.powerlineblog.com), one of 13
Web sites given credentials to cover the Republican convention in New York
later this month."
IOW ............. republican shills!
.
|
|
|
| User: "LaffsAtTheLaffer" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
18 Aug 2004 08:05:20 AM |
|
|
In article <10i5jhtjhbee2cd@corp.supernews.com>,
"ZenIsWhen" <ZenIsWhen@anywhere.com> wrote:
"John H. Hinderaker and Scott W. Johnson are Minneapolis attorneys and
proprietors of the Web log "Power Line" (www.powerlineblog.com), one of 13
Web sites given credentials to cover the Republican convention in New York
later this month."
IOW ............. republican shills!
New York Times - refuses to report on Kerry's proven lie of claiming to
be in Cambodia
Washington Post - refuses to report on Kerry's proven lie of claiming to
be in Cambodia
IOW.........democrat shills!
Even the Kerry campaign can't get two non-contradictory stories
together on this subject:
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/tonyblankley/tb20040818.shtml
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Warren Stupidity" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
18 Aug 2004 06:19:30 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:05:41 -0400, LaffsAtTheLaffer
<LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs@rightwingers.com> wrote:
The Washington Post is AWOL:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4933509.html
Here is a clue:
http://www.mekongsources.com/MkRegion.asp
===
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country
and our people, and neither do we."
GW Bush, President by appointment 2001-2004.
The Washington NeoClowns can't even get their clown
shoes on right, and there is no wrong way to do that.
==
Mark Roddy
"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event like a
new Pearl Harbor."
-- Project for a New American Century,
-- the neocon cabal's blueprint for world empire.
http://www.newamericancentury.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Prophet Bush" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
18 Aug 2004 09:25:10 AM |
|
|
In article <epe6i0928jrlnglsoe2rchjbsuoare4rs9@4ax.com>, says...
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:05:41 -0400, LaffsAtTheLaffer
<LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs@rightwingers.com> wrote:
The Washington Post is AWOL:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4933509.html
Here is a clue:
http://www.mekongsources.com/MkRegion.asp
===
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country
and our people, and neither do we."
GW Bush, President by appointment 2001-2004.
The Washington NeoClowns can't even get their clown
shoes on right, and there is no wrong way to do that.
==
Mark Roddy
"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event like a
new Pearl Harbor."
-- Project for a New American Century,
-- the neocon cabal's blueprint for world empire.
http://www.newamericancentury.org
Yeah, imagine all the votes he would have gotten if he
had pulled that one off. I mean, the only reason I was
going to vote for Kerry was because he was in Cambodia.
Now, come to find out he was 50 miles away! That
sneaky little *****. At least when Bush lies, it's
about something trivial, like why we are attacked Iraq.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Warren Stupidity" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
18 Aug 2004 10:14:27 PM |
|
|
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:25:10 GMT, The Prophet Bush
<god_speaks_thru_me@rnc.org> wrote:
In article <epe6i0928jrlnglsoe2rchjbsuoare4rs9@4ax.com>, says...
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:05:41 -0400, LaffsAtTheLaffer
<LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs@rightwingers.com> wrote:
The Washington Post is AWOL:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4933509.html
Here is a clue:
http://www.mekongsources.com/MkRegion.asp
===
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country
and our people, and neither do we."
GW Bush, President by appointment 2001-2004.
The Washington NeoClowns can't even get their clown
shoes on right, and there is no wrong way to do that.
==
Mark Roddy
"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event like a
new Pearl Harbor."
-- Project for a New American Century,
-- the neocon cabal's blueprint for world empire.
http://www.newamericancentury.org
Yeah, imagine all the votes he would have gotten if he
had pulled that one off. I mean, the only reason I was
going to vote for Kerry was because he was in Cambodia.
Now, come to find out he was 50 miles away! That
sneaky little *****. At least when Bush lies, it's
about something trivial, like why we are attacked Iraq.
I think it is entirely reasonable that in fact he was in Cambodia. The
Mekong patrols were trying to cut off the supply routes going down the
Mekong from Cambodia. I realize that officially we were hardly ever in
Cambodia except once, if I remember correctly, but I also think that
official reality wrt the vietnam war and actual reality were two very
different things.
===
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we.
They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country
and our people, and neither do we."
GW Bush, President by appointment 2001-2004.
The Washington NeoClowns can't even get their clown
shoes on right, and there is no wrong way to do that.
==
Mark Roddy
"Further, the process of transformation,
even if it brings revolutionary change, is
likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event like a
new Pearl Harbor."
-- Project for a New American Century,
-- the neocon cabal's blueprint for world empire.
http://www.newamericancentury.org
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Joe S." |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
17 Aug 2004 09:24:09 PM |
|
|
There's a major fallacy in this article: Everyone is talking about "secret
missions" into Cambodia.
There was nothing secret about it. The border was ill-defined. The little
dashed line on the maps we carried was not laid out on the ground. I was a
ground-pounder in Vietnam and we were in and out of Cambodia because that's
where operations took us -- nothing secret, nothing covert, no CIA
involvement. Just an infantry company following trails, setting ambushes,
chasing snipers, smelling cooking fires and heading in that direction. When
we realized we were in Cambodia we finished what we were about and moved out
but incursions across the border were nothing unusual, nor was it unusual to
remain overnight. No one intentionally said, *****, let's go screw around
inside Cambodia -- call it hot pursuit or whatever -- it happened.
--
-----
Joe S.
"LaffsAtTheLaffer" <LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs@rightwingers.com> wrote in message
news:LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs-DB0255.22054117082004@v1gc.ha-net.ptd.net...
The Washington Post is AWOL:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4933509.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "LaffsAtTheLaffer" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
18 Aug 2004 08:13:05 AM |
|
|
In article <cfuek501ar3@news3.newsguy.com>,
"Joe S." <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:
There's a major fallacy in this article: Everyone is talking about "secret
missions" into Cambodia.
Bzzzzt. WRONG!
EVEN KERRY NOW ADMITS he was not in Cambodia on Christmas eve!
He had to. It was too evident that he lied.
The major fallacy is that Kerry has claimed to be in Cambodia
on Christmas eve 1968 many time and even his own biography
contradicts this story. It says he was 50 miles away.
The men who were with him on Christmas eve say they were 50 miles away.
His division never even patrolled the Mekong river near Cambodia.
Kerry was in the COASTAL DIVISION. The area near Cambodia was
patrolled by the RIVER DIVISION. Kerry tries to obscure this
fact pretending that 50 miles away is "close." It depends on
what the definition of "close" is.
NOBODY can back up Kerry on this story.
There was nothing secret about it. The border was ill-defined.
Bzzzzt. WRONG AGAIN!
The river border was guarded and lined with cement pylons which made
it physically impossible for a swift boat to pass.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dkat" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
19 Aug 2004 09:53:07 AM |
|
|
"LaffsAtTheLaffer" <LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs@rightwingers.com> wrote in message
news:LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs-A2F2FD.09130518082004@v1gc.ha-net.ptd.net...
In article <cfuek501ar3@news3.newsguy.com>,
"Joe S." <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:
There's a major fallacy in this article: Everyone is talking about
"secret
missions" into Cambodia.
Bzzzzt. WRONG!
EVEN KERRY NOW ADMITS he was not in Cambodia on Christmas eve!
He had to. It was too evident that he lied.
The major fallacy is that Kerry has claimed to be in Cambodia
on Christmas eve 1968 many time and even his own biography
contradicts this story. It says he was 50 miles away.
The men who were with him on Christmas eve say they were 50 miles away.
His division never even patrolled the Mekong river near Cambodia.
Kerry was in the COASTAL DIVISION. The area near Cambodia was
patrolled by the RIVER DIVISION. Kerry tries to obscure this
fact pretending that 50 miles away is "close." It depends on
what the definition of "close" is.
NOBODY can back up Kerry on this story.
There was nothing secret about it. The border was ill-defined.
Bzzzzt. WRONG AGAIN!
The river border was guarded and lined with cement pylons which made
it physically impossible for a swift boat to pass.
So I take it you were there?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dave Cook" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
19 Aug 2004 02:18:58 PM |
|
|
"dkat" <dkat@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<n93Vc.28896$vc4.12641482@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
"LaffsAtTheLaffer" <LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs@rightwingers.com> wrote in message
news:LaffsAtTheGuyWhoLaffs-A2F2FD.09130518082004@v1gc.ha-net.ptd.net...
In article <cfuek501ar3@news3.newsguy.com>,
"Joe S." <nobody@nowhere.net> wrote:
There's a major fallacy in this article: Everyone is talking about
"secret
missions" into Cambodia.
Bzzzzt. WRONG!
EVEN KERRY NOW ADMITS he was not in Cambodia on Christmas eve!
He had to. It was too evident that he lied.
The major fallacy is that Kerry has claimed to be in Cambodia
on Christmas eve 1968 many time and even his own biography
contradicts this story. It says he was 50 miles away.
The men who were with him on Christmas eve say they were 50 miles away.
His division never even patrolled the Mekong river near Cambodia.
Kerry was in the COASTAL DIVISION. The area near Cambodia was
patrolled by the RIVER DIVISION. Kerry tries to obscure this
fact pretending that 50 miles away is "close." It depends on
what the definition of "close" is.
NOBODY can back up Kerry on this story.
There was nothing secret about it. The border was ill-defined.
Bzzzzt. WRONG AGAIN!
The river border was guarded and lined with cement pylons which made
it physically impossible for a swift boat to pass.
So I take it you were there?
His point is still important. Kerry lied about many things involving
Vietnam, from his stuff about baby killers, and massacres that hurt
our soldiers, their families, and the war effort, to stories of his
trips to Cambodia, to heroic actions under fire, and wounds that
deserve a purple heart. Is there any truth in the man?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Prophet Bush" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post can't handle the truth |
17 Aug 2004 10:45:34 PM |
|
|
In article <cfuek501ar3@news3.newsguy.com>, says...
There's a major fallacy in this article: Everyone is talking about "secret
missions" into Cambodia.
There was nothing secret about it. The border was ill-defined. The little
dashed line on the maps we carried was not laid out on the ground. I was a
ground-pounder in Vietnam and we were in and out of Cambodia because that's
where operations took us -- nothing secret, nothing covert, no CIA
involvement. Just an infantry company following trails, setting ambushes,
chasing snipers, smelling cooking fires and heading in that direction. When
we realized we were in Cambodia we finished what we were about and moved out
but incursions across the border were nothing unusual, nor was it unusual to
remain overnight. No one intentionally said, *****, let's go screw around
inside Cambodia -- call it hot pursuit or whatever -- it happened.
It's pretty clear where the border is, just look for
the "Welcome to Cambodia" sign.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
