| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"John Kerry, Horses Ass" |
| Date: |
22 Aug 2004 06:14:42 AM |
| Object: |
Washington Post Kisses Kerry's ***** |
Once again, another "investigative" newspaper kisses up to John Forbes
Kerry. Why? Because of their bias. Because they want him elected.
Because they inherently trust everything he says, even while disputing
everything the President says and grill the President every time he says
anything.
Here's the Washington Post subheadline:
"Critics Fail to Disprove Kerry's Version of Vietnam War Episode"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21239-2004Aug21.html
Note - that subheadline could just as honestly and accurately read:
"Kerry and His Small Group of Supporters Fail to Prove Kerry's Version of
Vietnam War Episode"
There are MORE veterans who DISPUTE Kerry's account than who support it.
And if it were Bush making the claims Kerry made, the Washington Post
reporters would be all over him, groping and grabbing and tearing at him
like it was a gang rape. But because it is Kerry, their hero, the Post
ASSUMES Kerry is telling the truth, and the Post attempts to impose the
burden of proof on OTHERS, rather than on Kerry!
Kerry is a fraud, and the Washington Post is functioning as his shill, his
527, his coordinated little helper, trying to move him towards his election
goal.
Shame on the liar John Kerry, and shame on the "investigative" Washington
Post.
.
|
|
| User: "InsuranceBroker" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post Kisses Kerry's ***** |
22 Aug 2004 06:24:02 AM |
|
|
Subject: Washington Post Kisses Kerry's *****
From: "John Kerry, Horse's *****"
Date: 8/22/2004 7:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <Ce%Vc.9545$3O3.6798@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Once again, another "investigative" newspaper kisses up to John Forbes
Kerry. Why? Because of their bias. Because they want him elected.
Because they inherently trust everything he says, even while disputing
everything the President says and grill the President every time he says
anything.
Here's the Washington Post subheadline:
"Critics Fail to Disprove Kerry's Version of Vietnam War Episode"
I know that you are pissed especially since everyone proved the George W. Bush
was awol and possible deserted in time of war but get over it. Do you know how
bad you will feel when that idiot bush is fired in november.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21239-2004Aug21.html
Note - that subheadline could just as honestly and accurately read:
"Kerry and His Small Group of Supporters Fail to Prove Kerry's Version of
Vietnam War Episode"
There are MORE veterans who DISPUTE Kerry's account than who support it.
And if it were Bush making the claims Kerry made, the Washington Post
reporters would be all over him, groping and grabbing and tearing at him
like it was a gang rape. But because it is Kerry, their hero, the Post
ASSUMES Kerry is telling the truth, and the Post attempts to impose the
burden of proof on OTHERS, rather than on Kerry!
Kerry is a fraud, and the Washington Post is functioning as his shill, his
527, his coordinated little helper, trying to move him towards his election
goal.
Shame on the liar John Kerry, and shame on the "investigative" Washington
Post.
Doing Insurance business in the Garden State
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Kerry, Horses Ass" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post Kisses Kerry's ***** |
22 Aug 2004 06:40:43 AM |
|
|
Once again, "Insurance Broker" proves himself unable to deal with the
obvious bias of the Washington Post.
"InsuranceBroker" <insurancenj@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040822072402.22153.00002072@mb-m07.aol.com...
Subject: Washington Post Kisses Kerry's *****
From: "John Kerry, Horse's *****"
Date: 8/22/2004 7:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <Ce%Vc.9545$3O3.6798@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Once again, another "investigative" newspaper kisses up to John Forbes
Kerry. Why? Because of their bias. Because they want him elected.
Because they inherently trust everything he says, even while disputing
everything the President says and grill the President every time he says
anything.
Here's the Washington Post subheadline:
"Critics Fail to Disprove Kerry's Version of Vietnam War Episode"
I know that you are pissed especially since everyone proved the George W.
Bush
was awol and possible deserted in time of war but get over it. Do you
know how
bad you will feel when that idiot bush is fired in november.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21239-2004Aug21.html
Note - that subheadline could just as honestly and accurately read:
"Kerry and His Small Group of Supporters Fail to Prove Kerry's Version of
Vietnam War Episode"
There are MORE veterans who DISPUTE Kerry's account than who support it.
And if it were Bush making the claims Kerry made, the Washington Post
reporters would be all over him, groping and grabbing and tearing at him
like it was a gang rape. But because it is Kerry, their hero, the Post
ASSUMES Kerry is telling the truth, and the Post attempts to impose the
burden of proof on OTHERS, rather than on Kerry!
Kerry is a fraud, and the Washington Post is functioning as his shill,
his
527, his coordinated little helper, trying to move him towards his
election
goal.
Shame on the liar John Kerry, and shame on the "investigative" Washington
Post.
Doing Insurance business in the Garden State
.
|
|
|
| User: "Parsifal" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post Kisses Kerry's ***** |
22 Aug 2004 10:55:11 AM |
|
|
"John Kerry, Horse's *****" <> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:%C%Vc.9553$3O3.7073@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Once again, "Insurance Broker" proves himself unable to deal with the
obvious bias of the Washington Post.
How about you? You repeat everything Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are
saying...
Gee, babs, stop embarassing yourself like this...
"InsuranceBroker" <insurancenj@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040822072402.22153.00002072@mb-m07.aol.com...
Subject: Washington Post Kisses Kerry's *****
From: "John Kerry, Horse's *****"
Date: 8/22/2004 7:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <Ce%Vc.9545$3O3.6798@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Once again, another "investigative" newspaper kisses up to John Forbes
Kerry. Why? Because of their bias. Because they want him elected.
Because they inherently trust everything he says, even while disputing
everything the President says and grill the President every time he
says
anything.
Here's the Washington Post subheadline:
"Critics Fail to Disprove Kerry's Version of Vietnam War Episode"
I know that you are pissed especially since everyone proved the George
W.
Bush
was awol and possible deserted in time of war but get over it. Do you
know how
bad you will feel when that idiot bush is fired in november.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21239-2004Aug21.html
Note - that subheadline could just as honestly and accurately read:
"Kerry and His Small Group of Supporters Fail to Prove Kerry's Version
of
Vietnam War Episode"
There are MORE veterans who DISPUTE Kerry's account than who support
it.
And if it were Bush making the claims Kerry made, the Washington Post
reporters would be all over him, groping and grabbing and tearing at
him
like it was a gang rape. But because it is Kerry, their hero, the
Post
ASSUMES Kerry is telling the truth, and the Post attempts to impose the
burden of proof on OTHERS, rather than on Kerry!
Kerry is a fraud, and the Washington Post is functioning as his shill,
his
527, his coordinated little helper, trying to move him towards his
election
goal.
Shame on the liar John Kerry, and shame on the "investigative"
Washington
Post.
Doing Insurance business in the Garden State
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven Hunter" |
|
| Title: Re: Washington Post Kisses Kerry's ***** |
22 Aug 2004 02:00:01 PM |
|
|
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 Horse's ***** wrote:
Once again, another "investigative" newspaper kisses up to John Forbes
Kerry. Why? Because of their bias. Because they want him elected.
Because they inherently trust everything he says, even while disputing
everything the President says and grill the President every time he says
anything.
Since you are setting out to "shoot the messengers", perhaps you
shouldconsider loading up on ammo...
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
