| Topic: |
Politics > Politics-USA |
| User: |
"Mike Hunt" |
| Date: |
01 Mar 2007 11:40:30 AM |
| Object: |
WASHINGTON TIMES....Not a very Credible media.... |
The Washington Times is hardly a credible newspaper.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times
The Times was founded in 1982 by Sun Myung Moon, leader of the
Unification Church and the Family Federation for World Peace and
Unification, to be a conservative alternative to the larger Washington
Post. The Times is widely perceived as maintaining a strongly right-
leaning editorial stance. By 2002, the Unification Church had spent
about $1.7 billion in subs idies for the Times.
Question is...Can it be trusted ?
.
|
|
| User: "can_o_worms" |
|
| Title: Re: WASHINGTON TIMES....Not a very Credible media.... |
01 Mar 2007 08:46:02 PM |
|
|
On 1 Mar 2007 09:40:30 -0800, "Mike Hunt" <allahu@personal.ro> wrote:
The Washington Times is hardly a credible newspaper.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times
The Times was founded in 1982 by Sun Myung Moon, leader of the
Unification Church and the Family Federation for World Peace and
Unification, to be a conservative alternative to the larger Washington
Post. The Times is widely perceived as maintaining a strongly right-
leaning editorial stance. By 2002, the Unification Church had spent
about $1.7 billion in subs idies for the Times.
Question is...Can it be trusted ?
Paul Craig Roberts has it right when he lists the
following shills for wars in our Israel centered
war on terrrorrrism:
Weekly Standard, National Review, Fox News, New York Times,
CNN, and the Wall Street Journal editorial page
I might add the Lefty New Republic who likes wars
they percieve to be in Israel's better interest, then
abandon them when they go wrong.
If your looking for a principled conservative rag , you
could do no better than the "American Conservative"
www.amconmag.com
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: WASHINGTON TIMES....Not a very Credible media.... |
01 Mar 2007 01:59:36 PM |
|
|
On Mar 1, 12:40 pm, "Mike Hunt" <all...@personal.ro> wrote:
The Washington Times is hardly a credible newspaper.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Washington_Times
The Times was founded in 1982 by Sun Myung Moon, leader of the
Unification Church and the Family Federation for World Peace and
Unification, to be a conservative alternative to the larger Washington
Post. The Times is widely perceived as maintaining a strongly right-
leaning editorial stance. By 2002, the Unification Church had spent
about $1.7 billion in subs idies for the Times.
Question is...Can it be trusted ?
I know a consultant who has worked for the Washington Times and I have
asked him that same question. He said you probably won't believe me
but the Rev. Moon does not in any way, shape, or form dictate content
or views at the paper. A while ago he came to the paper to try and do
just that, and the staff just said good luck in writing the paper
yourself. He has not tried to dictate content since.
Now the real question is can the Washington Post be trusted to tell
the truth in their paper? The fact is that the Washington Post is so
far politically left that their liberal blindness prevents them from
telling the whole truth about pretty much anything. I say "whole
truth" because there are always two sides of a story; yet, we only
seem to get the left side or "no side" from the Post. What I mean by
"no side" is that when a story comes out that contradicts the Post's
position on an issue, unless that story is a national headline, the
post ignores it.
What this all boils down to is that you are more likely to get the
whole story and thereby the truth from the Washington Times as opposed
to; you can't believe anything printed in the Washington Post as being
the "whole truth".
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
