We Are Living in a State of Anarchy



 Politics > Politics-USA > We Are Living in a State of Anarchy

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Politics > Politics-USA
User: "Joe Blowtowski"
Date: 29 Aug 2004 04:02:19 PM
Object: We Are Living in a State of Anarchy
===============================================
“We Are Living in a State of Anarchy”:
Radical Assessments and Agendas in theYear 1968
Protests against party leadership and policies during the
1968 Democratic Party National Convention, held in Chicago,
exploded into violent street confrontations.
The 10,000 protesters faced more than 20,000 army troops and
police officers. The Walker Report, a federal investigation of the
incident, characterized the conflict as “a police riot” and blamed
Mayor Richard J. Daley in part for the
“unrestrained and indiscriminate police violence.”
While only seven police officers faced dismissal proceedings, eight
leaders of protesting organizations were indicted for conspiring to
violate the 1968 Anti-Riot Act. Documents from the National
Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam (or Mobe)
and the Youth International Party (or “Yippies,”)— two groups
central in organizing the protest—appeared in the following
testimony of activist Tom Hayden at a House Committee on
Un-American Activities hearing to investigate
“subversive involvement” in the disruption. Hayden co-authored
the Port Huron Statement, the founding document of Students
for a Democratic Society (SDS), the leading New Left coalition,
in 1962.
Despite outrage at the current “state of anarchy,” he remained
devoted to participatory democracy. Although Hayden and four
others were convicted of various charges in the sensationalist
Chicago Conspiracy trial, an appeals court reversed the verdicts.
see: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6464
--------------------------------------
“Identify them by their garb.”
--------------------------------------
The Democratic party arrived at its 1968 convention in Chicago
torn apart by the Vietnam war and the assassinations of Robert
Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. As delegates and protestors
arrived in Chicago in late August 1968, the Chicago American
newspaper published a guide to the “cast of characters” converging
on the city.
(see image) http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mpimages/mp261.jpg
Illustrating student supporters of Eugene McCarthy, activists
identified with the National Mobilization Against the War (the
“Mobe”), liberal Democrats opposed to the Johnson Administration,
hippies, Yippies, apolitical greasers, and outlaw bikers, the guide
identified political attitudes through stereotypes of dress and hair
style. The American failed to note any African Americans among
the dissenting delegates and demonstrators.
see: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6798
see image at
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mpimages/mp261.jpg
============================================ end
OK Folks..
now while there was all of this 'Lib' PROTEST (which is OK)
in 1968
and all of this Anarchy...
were the Radical Left then,
was acting much as they are [still] today..
could you please explain this to me
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election%2C_1968
and this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ElectoralCollege1968-Large.png
what other conclusion can you come to?
America rejected Radical Liberalism!
Whenever Extreme Liberalism shows it's ugly Face
mainstream America rejects it
NEXT:
Then after, "FOUR MORE YEARS of HELL"
after a few more years of Radical Extremist Liberalism that far
exceded the previous years..
When the Liberals went completely out of their minds
INSANE, while they were being LED by Lt. John Forbes Kerry
on his private JIHAD against America and it's Soldiers..
Look what happened
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election%2C_1972
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ElectoralCollege1972-Large.png
Can you explain that to me?
Once again: America rejected Radical Liberalism!
Extreme Liberalism showed it's ugly Face
and mainstream America rejected it.
They rejected it in a Landslide Defeat!
520 electoral votes to 17 votes
49 states to 1 state
America rejected Radical Liberalism in 1968
America rejected Radical Liberalism in 1972
America rejected Radical Liberalism in 1980
America rejected Radical Liberalism in 1984
History shows that whenever Radical Extremist Liberalism
emerges.. a Landslide Victory goes to the Republicans..
America Rejected this Radical form of Extremist Liberalism
in the past, and they will again...
"...this is all part of the Master Plan, so BILL CLINTON can
become the Saviour to the Democratic party. He is their God,
and they worship him..."
- pg. 336 'Bill Clinton - Magical Man of Mystery'
.

User: "R*G*B+L*A*B color-pro"

Title: Re: We Are Living in a State of Anarchy 29 Aug 2004 04:51:15 PM
Joe you just dying for the good old days of the 60's ain't ya
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:02:19 -0700, Joe Blowtowski
<Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote:

===============================================
“We Are Living in a State of Anarchy”:
Radical Assessments and Agendas in theYear 1968

Protests against party leadership and policies during the
1968 Democratic Party National Convention, held in Chicago,
exploded into violent street confrontations.

Well sure ain't going to be any Republicans rioting in NYC at this
one, that's for sure. That's too much against the grain of the
Republican "heel boy!" mentality ha ha ha
.
User: "Joe Blowtowski"

Title: Re: We Are Living in a State of Anarchy 29 Aug 2004 04:55:58 PM
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:51:15 -0700, R*G*B+L*A*B <color-pro> wrote:

Joe you just dying for the good old days of the 60's ain't ya

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:02:19 -0700, Joe Blowtowski
<Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote:

===============================================
“We Are Living in a State of Anarchy”:
Radical Assessments and Agendas in theYear 1968

Protests against party leadership and policies during the
1968 Democratic Party National Convention, held in Chicago,
exploded into violent street confrontations.


Well sure ain't going to be any Republicans rioting in NYC at this
one, that's for sure. That's too much against the grain of the
Republican "heel boy!" mentality ha ha ha

I noticed that you ignored the TRUTH
Whenever Extreme Liberalism shows it's ugly Face
mainstream America rejects it
.


User: "Roger"

Title: Re: We Are Living in a State of Anarchy 30 Aug 2004 07:58:08 AM
Small child.
Very small.
"Joe Blowtowski" <Joe_Blow@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:pcf4j09ie2dnp63e4fdj5o5gsqi9utp4cr@4ax.com...


===============================================
"We Are Living in a State of Anarchy":
Radical Assessments and Agendas in theYear 1968

Protests against party leadership and policies during the
1968 Democratic Party National Convention, held in Chicago,
exploded into violent street confrontations.

The 10,000 protesters faced more than 20,000 army troops and
police officers. The Walker Report, a federal investigation of the
incident, characterized the conflict as "a police riot" and blamed
Mayor Richard J. Daley in part for the
"unrestrained and indiscriminate police violence."

While only seven police officers faced dismissal proceedings, eight
leaders of protesting organizations were indicted for conspiring to
violate the 1968 Anti-Riot Act. Documents from the National
Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam (or Mobe)
and the Youth International Party (or "Yippies,")- two groups
central in organizing the protest-appeared in the following
testimony of activist Tom Hayden at a House Committee on
Un-American Activities hearing to investigate
"subversive involvement" in the disruption. Hayden co-authored
the Port Huron Statement, the founding document of Students
for a Democratic Society (SDS), the leading New Left coalition,
in 1962.

Despite outrage at the current "state of anarchy," he remained
devoted to participatory democracy. Although Hayden and four
others were convicted of various charges in the sensationalist
Chicago Conspiracy trial, an appeals court reversed the verdicts.

see: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6464


--------------------------------------
"Identify them by their garb."
--------------------------------------
The Democratic party arrived at its 1968 convention in Chicago
torn apart by the Vietnam war and the assassinations of Robert
Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. As delegates and protestors
arrived in Chicago in late August 1968, the Chicago American
newspaper published a guide to the "cast of characters" converging
on the city.
(see image) http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mpimages/mp261.jpg


Illustrating student supporters of Eugene McCarthy, activists
identified with the National Mobilization Against the War (the
"Mobe"), liberal Democrats opposed to the Johnson Administration,
hippies, Yippies, apolitical greasers, and outlaw bikers, the guide
identified political attitudes through stereotypes of dress and hair
style. The American failed to note any African Americans among
the dissenting delegates and demonstrators.

see: http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6798

see image at
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mpimages/mp261.jpg

============================================ end



OK Folks..
now while there was all of this 'Lib' PROTEST (which is OK)
in 1968
and all of this Anarchy...

were the Radical Left then,
was acting much as they are [still] today..


could you please explain this to me

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election%2C_1968
and this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ElectoralCollege1968-Large.png


what other conclusion can you come to?
America rejected Radical Liberalism!

Whenever Extreme Liberalism shows it's ugly Face
mainstream America rejects it




NEXT:

Then after, "FOUR MORE YEARS of HELL"

after a few more years of Radical Extremist Liberalism that far
exceded the previous years..

When the Liberals went completely out of their minds
INSANE, while they were being LED by Lt. John Forbes Kerry
on his private JIHAD against America and it's Soldiers..


Look what happened
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election%2C_1972
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ElectoralCollege1972-Large.png


Can you explain that to me?

Once again: America rejected Radical Liberalism!

Extreme Liberalism showed it's ugly Face
and mainstream America rejected it.

They rejected it in a Landslide Defeat!
520 electoral votes to 17 votes
49 states to 1 state

America rejected Radical Liberalism in 1968
America rejected Radical Liberalism in 1972
America rejected Radical Liberalism in 1980
America rejected Radical Liberalism in 1984

History shows that whenever Radical Extremist Liberalism
emerges.. a Landslide Victory goes to the Republicans..


America Rejected this Radical form of Extremist Liberalism
in the past, and they will again...




"...this is all part of the Master Plan, so BILL CLINTON can
become the Saviour to the Democratic party. He is their God,
and they worship him..."
- pg. 336 'Bill Clinton - Magical Man of Mystery'










.

User: "Joe Blowtowski"

Title: Re: We Are Living in a State of Anarchy 29 Aug 2004 04:46:35 PM
Think of it this way..
have you ever had a friend that was in trouble?
A good friend, but one that just went (Temporarily) insane?
That is what the Democratic Party is today..
the Democratic Party has problems!
It needs to go through TREATMENT just like a
Heroin addict needs to go through TREATMENT
in able recover from his/her addiction.
The Democratic party need to heal. It needs to get well!
and it will..
But first it will have to hit ROCK BOTTOM.
They have to and will Bottom out. All the way.
And we, as Democrats (and republicans) will have to VOTE
the Radical Extremist Liberal-ists out of Office at the State and
Local levels. It is our Duty as Americans.
Tom Daschell - has to be gone or the Democratic Party can't heal
Ted Kennedy - has to be gone or the Democratic Party can't heal
Charley Rangel - has to be gone or the Democratic Party can't heal
Nancy Pelozi - has to be gone or the Democratic Party can't heal
Jim McDermott - has to be gone or the Democratic Party can't heal
John Kerry - has to be gone or the Democratic Party can't heal
lots more - have to be gone or the Democratic Party can't heal
and Hillary...
- she should be gone, but she is also important..
BILL CLINTON
will be the one to Heal
all of the ill's of the Democratic Party
and Hillary.. she will just go along for the ride
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
Ohio has become the most corrupt state in the nation. Even lobbyists are gagging at its sleaze.
Why are the steps of the state capitol not filled with angry mothersand fathers demanding accountability by the Legislature, the governor andthe leaders of the state Department of Social and Health Services?
White House: Cheney Visitor Logs Are State Secrets
Are Republican Leaders Leaking State Secrets?
More illegal immigrants are pouring into the state to give birth
"Trouble, I Say There's Trouble Right Here In River City" and in every State, County, City and Town in America: WHAT ARE YOU VOTERS GONNA DO ABOUT IT?
Bush's Former Secretary of State Says "We Are Losing the War"
Sharon: NO Palestinian State Unless Five Specific Conditions Are Met.
Conservatives are divided, even in President Bush's home state
Injection wells accepting toxins-State says it had little choicebut to approve the license; Wayne County residents are not happy.
Major drug makers are sued by Ky. Attorney General for cheating state.
The terminally ill Washington State Republicans are at it again
Are the Neo-Cons Pursuing a Failed Nation-State Policy in the Middle East?
Liberalism Is a Mental Disorder ==> It's Over for Kerry in Louisiana; Are Other State Democrat Hopefuls Next?
Phony 'Red States are the majority of voters in U.S.' argument ( Re: What 's the problem with these Red State Hillbillys?)
 

NEWER

pg.3585     pg.2749     pg.2106     pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER